Open mike 09/05/2025

Written By: - Date published: 6:00 am, May 9th, 2025 - 32 comments
Categories: open mike - Tags:


Open mike is your post.

For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Step up to the mike …

32 comments on “Open mike 09/05/2025 ”

  1. gsays 1

    Taking my lunch break late and in town.

    Going to congregate outside Suze Redmayne's electorate office in Feilding.

    Fortunately I have a sympathetic supervisor and an agent understanding boss.

    • Res Publica 1.1

      She has to be the most useless MP in Rangitikei's history. She hasn't even managed a single cattle rustling bill.

      She's also never had the courage nor the grace to respond to any of the emails I've sent her.

    • gsays 1.2

      Standing room only in a rainy Feilding day.

      Great turnout.

      • Drowsy M. Kram 1.2.1

        And great speeches. Nat MP Suze Redmayne – Absent. Green MP Teanau Tuiono spoke about the "nasty" way the Equal Pay Amendment Bill was introduced to parliament, the "glee" on the faces of 'our' ACT MPs as the bill was voted on under urgency, and that "the ACT party tail is wagging the [willing?] National party dog."

        STAND UP – FIGHT BACK!
        For the MANY, not the moneyed.

        • gsays 1.2.1.1

          He also mentioned the manner in which the house found out about the law.

          Dropped right after question time. No time to research or analyze it.

          His description of its introduction and intent is nasty.

          Big shout out to Union boffins in Wellys who, at no notice, had a protest on Parliament steps 2 hours later.

          C'mon Labour, where are the snappy phrases and sound bites. We need to know this mongrel legislation is going to be repealed immediately after the election.
          One sign was “National Wahine Disaster”.

  2. Jilly Bee 2

    I'm going to stand outside Tim van der Molen's office in Matamata. I'm retired and a superannuitant, but I need to make a stand over the injustice of this rotten legislation – I have a sneaky suspicion that I may be a lone voice in the wilderness. Shame on Brooke van Velden and David Seymour and double shame on Christopher Luxon for just standing by and letting this happen.

    • gsays 2.1

      Well done Jilly.

      I was just thinking about a few of the ECEs I know. Unfortunately they won't be there. Unable to get the time off and can't afford the leave.

      That's where folk like you come in. To make yr presence felt on their behalf.

  3. aj 3

    Dame Anne Salmond has written a fantastic article on where we are at.

    In the Great Chain of Being, a medieval idea, God sits at the top followed by archangels and angels, a divine sovereign (the origin of sovereignty), the ranks of aristocrats and commoners, with men over women, and civilised people over barbarians and savages, followed by sentient and non-sentient animals, fish, insects, plants and rocks. Everything further down the Great Chain is a ‘lower’ form of life, and expected to offer up tribute and service to everything higher up.

    https://newsroom.co.nz/2025/05/09/anne-salmond-she-wont-be-right-mate/

    • Incognito 3.1

      Yes, excellent piece.

      And what about the female MPs who supported this bill? Do none of them remember those who fought for the privileges they now enjoy? Why are they unwilling to extend these privileges to others?

      Indeed, how would Brooke van Velden and her fellow Coalition Sisters (Nicola Willis, Erica Stanford, Louise Upston, Judith Collins, Penny Simmonds, Nicola Grigg, Nicole McKee, Karen Chhour, Casey Costello, and Jenny Marcroft) and the other female MPs of the coalition parties feel if they were paid 20% or so less than their male counterparts?

      I wonder what the women mentioned in this article would say about Brooke’s sexist move?

      https://www.parliament.nz/en/get-involved/features/parliament-becoming-more-family-friendly/

      • aj 3.1.1

        National party MPs of all genders have a history of climbing ladders then removing them for those who want to follow. It's in their DNA.

        • Incognito 3.1.1.1

          I’m more fascinated by the DNA of the people who vote for National, ACT, or NZF and continue to do so. In terms of Darwinian evolution, this behaviour must provide demonstrable survival advantages to them.

          • aj 3.1.1.1.1

            Or imaginary advantages? or an irrational belief that despite apparently voting against their own interests they will lift themselves into a different socio-economic class? I suspect many of us know people who fit into those categories.

          • weka 3.1.1.1.2

            Honestly, I'm not sure most people think about it that much. Would love to see some research on how well informed people are when they vote.

  4. Obtrectator 4

    How the hell has this other shocker seemingly managed to fly below the radar?

    In the 3-9 May issue of NZ Listener, Danyl McLauchlan tells how a bill was introduced to Parliament on 31 March to amend the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act.

    The article is too long and complicated to summarise or quote from, but what this bill will achieve, if passed into law, is to retrospectively protect the ANZ and ASB banks from the legal consequences of charging excess fees. In effect (as a letter-writer in the following issue points out) the government proposes to intervene in a legal case to ensure victory for the defendants (those banks), who have doubtless been lobbying long and hard for just such an action.

    • joe90 4.1

      How the hell has this other shocker seemingly managed to fly below the radar?

      /

      Because once again the arseholes deliberately misled the electorate by hiding their intentions.

      When did the Government start work to scale back the pay equity law, and why was that work kept secret?

      Using information gleaned from interviews, redacted Government documents, and debate in Parliament, political reporter Glenn McConnell has pieced together a timeline of the pay equity reform.

      It took less than two days for the Government to reveal its plan to limit pay equity claims, and then change the law.

      https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360682026/when-government-started-work-limit-pay-equity-claims-and-why-public-wasnt-informed

      Nikki Chamberlain is a Senior Lecturer (Torts, Complex Litigation & Family Property) at University of Auckland Law School

      OPINION: There are certain principles in law that are sacrosanct. One of these is that the Government should not interfere with the independence of the courts and in particular, should not use its power to interfere with active litigation pending before the courts.

      Alarmingly, National MP and Minister for Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Scott Simpson, has recently tabled a Bill in Parliament that runs afoul of these basic principles.

      The Bill contains a retrospective law that would impact the rights of some 170,000 customers and their litigation funders currently taking a class action – that has been in train since 2021 – against two Australian-owned banks, ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited and ASB Bank Limited, and who reported profits of approximately $2.1 billion and $1.4 billion last year alone respectively (and, whose parent companies recorded profits of AUD$6.5 billion and AUD$9.5 billion respectively).

      The reasons for tabling this Bill are not convincing and the collateral consequences are grave. Let me unpack this in detail – and, please bear with me as we are about to get slightly technical.

      https://www.thepost.co.nz/business/360654387/alarm-sounded-over-proposed-law-change-benefiting-two-australian-banks

      archivedotli

      Of course the top end of town loves it.

      On 31 March 2025, the Government introduced a package of bills that will effect major changes to New Zealand’s financial services landscape. In particular, the changes include material simplifications to the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA), which will offer relief to lenders and should address longstanding concerns about the complexity, compliance burden, and unintended consequences of previous reforms.

      The changes will be broadly welcomed by lenders, with a shift toward a more pragmatic and proportionate regulatory framework. However, the package of reforms also introduces new risks to consider, particularly in relation to the expanded regulatory enforcement powers under the new oversight of the Financial Markets Authority (FMA).

      https://www.bellgully.com/insights/cccfa-cofi-update-major-reforms-offer-simplification-and-a-few-new-challenges/

      • joe90 4.1.1

        Astonishing dishonesty from these pricks.

        /

        Soon after the coalition Government formed, in November 2023, Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden says she pitched the idea of pay equity reform to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon.

        […]

        Asked when she first looked into changing the Equal Pay Act, van Velden told Stuff: “This is a policy programme I told the prime minister I was interested in doing right at the start of the term.”

        […]

        DECEMBER 2024: Cabinet investigates pay equity change

        A committee of senior ministers, led by Luxon, met in December to consider whether to change the Equal Pay Act.

        Van Velden says it was at this point that work started to amend the Equal Pay Act.

        While she said she’d raised the idea with Luxon in 2023, telling him it would be a good idea “if we’ve got the resources”, she said she started working to make it happen at this Cabinet meeting.

        “I didn't do work on that for a little while, not until really, when I went to Cabinet at the end of last year,” van Velden told Stuff

        […]

        MARCH 31, 2025: Cabinet agrees to change the Equal Pay Act

        After Cabinet’s Strategy Committee tasked van Velden with looking at how to amend the Equal Pay Act in December, Cabinet agreed to make changes on March 31.

        […]

        APRIL 7, 2025: Luxon releases his ‘quarterly plan’

        Ahead of a post-Cabinet press conference, Luxon releases a quarterly plan. These plans, which the prime minister’s office writes every three months, had been promoted as a guide to boost transparency and display the coalition’s priorities.

        But this plan makes no mention of the Government’s plan to amend the Equal Pay Act.

        Asked why, van Velden told Stuff: “Because I don’t put everything I do in the quarterly plan.”

        @thetasalmon.bsky.social‬

        Yep… “We planned this for two months, then deliberately avoided the proper process of expert assessment and public feedback and shoved it through in an afternoon, so no-one could stop us.” Not really “Urgent” then… was it. More “Anti-Democratic”… amirite?

        https://bsky.app/profile/thetasalmon.bsky.social/post/3loosbfgvf22n

    • gsays 4.2

      ".. under the radar"

      There was more than likely a distraction issue at the same time, eg Trump brain fart, tolling Turanga Te Aha proposal etc.

  5. Adrian 5

    It does seem to be that the modus operandi of right wing women and men on achieving power is to do all that is possible to deny that very opportunity to others. It seems to be part of that type of character traits of greed, veneality, sneering arrogance, nastiness and strong sense of entitlement of a large portion of their ilk.

  6. Incognito 6

    Profit is the leitmotif of Luxon’s Coalition and everything else must be subservient to this, e.g., the environment, workers, and the NZ science sector.

    https://newsroom.co.nz/2025/05/08/dairy-dominates-science-panel-as-govt-milks-research-for-profit/

    Luxon barely hides it:

    I also expect them to provide bold and courageous advice about those areas that aren’t delivering value for New Zealanders and may need to be deprioritised. It’s about making sure we are investing in what will have the greatest impact profit for New Zealanders. [FIFY]

    https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/pm%E2%80%99s-science-council-set-direction-science

    It’s impossible to escape the conclusion that this Council will take on the role of razor gang and cut, remove, and amputate everything and anything that does not give a clear line of low-risk profit to the bean counters in the Beehive.

    The first steps have already been made at cutting “baseline or ‘fundamental’ research” (aka basic or blue-sky).

    Peter Gluckman may want to repeat his words from 15 years ago:

    The other point I want to make is that we have to get beyond simplistic definitions of the types of science; how science gets applied can be quite unpredictable – that is the history of innovation. In the words of Lord Porter, a former president of the Royal Society – there are only two types of science, applied and not yet applied.

    https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/SC1010/S00035/gluckman-wider-roles-of-science-and-innovation.htm

    But I suspect that it will fall on deaf ears.

    • SPC 6.1

      Does capitalism hold up the world, like Atlas?

      And then in plain sight commits a highway robbery until the few have the wealth of the many.

    • SPC 6.2

      National once opposed R and D tax incentives.

      Recently they dismissed many involved in research and told them to re-apply for jobs months later. Some left overseas to better paid jobs than available here (end of loyalty)

      They re-organised research into a fewer number of amalgamated bodies (with less specialisation), so they could cut spending and employ a smaller number of research scientists (and not necessarily the best as they had overseas options).

      That was a deliberate reduction of long term capability, which they try and sell as a new focus on profit to business. As a service to business at a lower cost to well to do tax payers, their voters.

      In the end they betray all, in service to short term greed.

      National in all areas, a danger to our nation state.

      • Incognito 6.2.1

        Quite simply, National has no interest [no pun] in building a better New Zealand and a better place for New Zealanders to live, they’re only interested in growing the economy, which is an output captured in a spreadsheet. This amoral focus is a hallmark of neo-liberal capitalism and pays only lip service to people and their sense of meaning and belonging and as such it is inhuman – nobody really cares about others, only about themselves. The unstoppable march of AI is the next step along this trajectory.

  7. SPC 7

    The Prime Minister made assurances last year, he has now broken, as to setting up a new agency for compensation to those in state care.

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/560463/watch-live-no-new-compensation-scheme-for-abuse-survivors-more-funds-for-current-system

  8. aj 8

    I fear the worst but all power to this guy and the search team.

    British man Eli Sweeting failed to return from a day trip to climb Mitre Peak on Sunday.The search was called off on Thursday due to bad weather, but police said their efforts would resume on Friday, with fine conditions forecast.

    And the weather is fine.

    https://images-webcams.windy.com/public/76/1572407376/current/full/1572407376.jpg?token=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJ3ZWJjYW1faWQiOjE1NzI0MDczNzYsInVzZXJfdHlwZSI6MSwiYXZhaWxhYmxlX3NpemVzIjoidGVhc2VyYmcsaWNvbix0aHVtYm5haWwscHJldmlldyxub3JtYWwsZnVsbCxwYW5vcmFtYSIsImlhdCI6MTc0Njc1NTMyNywiZXhwIjoxNzQ2ODQxNzI3fQ.t7spuoO8f0TD72xl7zsK8HcMfoYPHkO1csU-mLr7Eq8

  9. Stephen D 9

    Can these pricks get any worse?

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/560498/government-announces-review-into-waitangi-tribunal-seymour-calls-it-

    "Act supports the completion of full and final historic Treaty settlements as a pragmatic way to resolve past injustices, but the Waitangi Tribunal has gone well beyond its brief and has become increasingly activist.

    "It's tried to become a source of authority in its own right and appears to regard itself as a parallel government that can intervene in the democratically elected government's policymaking process – like during the Treaty Principles Bill debate."

    He said it was time to put the Tribunal "in its place".

  10. Stephen D 10

    The more we can promote archive.li the better.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/360684052/battle-control-nzme-over

    “The battle for control of NZME’s board appears to be over, with former National MP and minister Stephen Joyce set to take up the role of board chair of the media company.”

Leave a Comment