Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
6:00 am, December 13th, 2024 - 27 comments
Categories: open mike -
Tags:
Open mike is your post.
For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.
The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).
Step up to the mike …
Following its harassment and intimidation of Sarah Wilkinson, Asa Winstanley and Richard Medhurst, the U.K. regime continues to crack down on Jewish anti-genocide protestors…
https://skwawkbox.org/2024/12/12/greenstein-to-be-formally-charged-under-terror-act-heres-where-to-be-to-support-him/
No one will be surprised to discover that Greenstein is an ex-member of the UK Labour party and Jewish.
Jewish human rights activists are also being ferociously persecuted in Germany.
https://jacobin.com/2024/06/germany-witch-hunt-jews-pro-palestine/
Sure targeting left wing Jews ex Labour (and others of the left) not part of the bi-partisan pro Israel consensus, but not so much Arabs/Moslems – such is politics.
The police harassment only began after Starmer became PM. Most likely its an initiative of one of his appointments related to police.
It appears to be the 2019 amendment of the 2000 Act – 1B
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/11/section/12#commentary-key-602079289d5d721e06a6ba3e9df0cbf7
In that regard in synch in with developments within the state of Israel.
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/podcasts/2024-11-30/ty-article-podcast/.premium/netanyahus-war-on-the-israeli-media-and-how-it-is-already-affecting-press-freedom/00000193-7e85-d7fe-a393-7f8d17600000
PS. It's a nuisance case, because there is no stated support for a proscribed organisation.
Starmer might use a loss in court to develop a further change to legislation, change a to support of militancy in a cause … that led others to support a proscribed group.
Still no guarantee of convincing a court.
It turns out that if the paper mills had signed long-term contracts for power supply they could have kept the power costs at only 15% of production costs. 85% of costs are labour, raw materials, repairs and maintenance and various overheads.
But Winstone paper mill opted instead to rely on the spot market which fluctuates manically for 50% of its power. This meant that for a very short period (basically August 2024) power costs escalated to 40% of production costs because of the low lake levels and because insufficient coal supplies were immediately available.
https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/08/21/the-power-and-the-story-are-electricity-prices-really-to-blame-for-mill-closures/#:~:text=For%20the%20company%2C%20that%20means,$60%20to%20$100/MWhr.%E2%80%9D
So the closure can't be blamed on power costs, it was just poor management. Shane Jones is wrong to blame power prices for the closure.
As I have posted before, Shane Jones's repeated references to "mountains of Indonesian coal" being used to power NZ is rubbish. Over the last 10 years coal has been responsible for only 7% of NZ's power on average. The need for coal will disappear within 10 years as solar power developments with grid-scale power storage attached (such as the proposal currently going for resource consent in the Maniototo) come on stream.
https://heliosenergy.co.nz/projects/maniototo
Katherine Ryan did an excellent spot this am on the electricity pricing for industry.
The issue is if fixed term contracts come up for renewal in a dry year, plus the cost of electricity futures 'insurance' that can vary from $100-500, depending on when the fixed term finishes.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon/audio/2018968265/energy-crisis-cost-economy-300m-analyst
Big Hairy News interviews Melanie Nelson (from 10 min), who has an opinion piece on the review of the Regulatory Standards Act, which, with the Treaty Principles Bill, she says, directly replace existing collectivist and equity principles in treaty and human rights legislation in government with Libertarian interpretations of private property and 'equal rights'.
A scary, chilling stealth attack by Act on the fundamental principles of our NZ state: stay long enough to listen what the downstream effects will be on protections; this is described 'meta-legislation', creating a libertarian straitjacket for ALL our legislation.
Introduced on the day the Hikoi arrived in Wgtn, and with a VERY short public consultation period. Seymour is Machiavellian, sneaking this stuff in under the radar duirng the holidays, and under the covering fire of the TPB.
Melanie does a great job of explaining, and thanks very much to BHN for helping bring this issue into public view.
To continue a recent discussion thread (starts here: https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-10-12-2024/#comment-2019279), there are compelling arguments not to stop after they let the dogs out and finally (!) banned greyhound racing in NZ.
https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/12/13/the-way-nz-treats-animals-a-race-to-the-bottom/
For several thousands of public servants, next week is their last week.
Many have already flown off of course to Australia and the UK.
But this is a scale of loss that will affect the ability to draft policy, execute policy, draft legislation and enforce regulations, and actually do the work of nursing, teaching, researching, interpreting, processing applications of all kinds, and more, for a generation to come.
No successive government will work as well as it could without them.
So this is my tribute to all the public servants and their families whose professional careers have been terminated by this government.
Thankyou for your service.
Wellington has lost around 11.6% of its employment over the past year.
Auckland is down around 10,000 jobs.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/536622/wellington-loses-11-point-6-percent-of-jobs-in-a-year
Great way to run a country. I thought these "economic genius's" would know about the multiplier effect, and that it works both ways – so if you intentionally decelerate the economy the effect will be an even greater slowing of the economy.
What do you get when you employ over 90 new staff on an average salary of $150k+ looking for a needle in a hairstack? Answer: hairbrained ideas and smoky mirrors.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/536579/hairdressers-say-they-didn-t-know-some-salon-rules-david-seymour-seeks-to-cut-existed-at-all
Seymour will probably discover some obscure forgotten regulation that says it is illegal to walk down the street with a chicken sandwich in your pocket, and then declare himself a hero for abolishing it.
Risky, I think he must have sensibly pocketed the chicken sandwiches at one of his school lunch publicity events. That's also considered best practice for children exposed to Compass lunch products and much safer than eating them.
Chicken sandwiches must be turned off and locked away in sealed lunchboxes and placed into schoolbags outside the classroom just like mobile phones and other risky items that could distract students and affect their performance in class or lead to unruly behaviour that obviously and inevitably leads to a life of youth crime. Any
class managerteacher should know this but it’s helpful that Seymour reminds them and has their backs.Looking forward to all those (very long-haired) people storming the hairdressers around the country after decades of "hair neglect" caused by lack of refreshments and inability to take their dogs along
ACC levies to be increased next year on vehicle registration.
One question not been put to the minister is why EV registration is being increased more than petrol cars.
ACC levies are levied according to how dangerous a particular vehicle is right? For instance motorbikes pay a higher level because the risk of injury is greater, right?
Then why do EVs get a higher increase than petrol cars?
Does the minister get his information from Facebook conspiracy theory pages and believe that EVs are more dangerous than petrol cars?
Or is it just another great opportunity for Simeon Brown and the rest of the CoC to vent their spite on those who chose zero emission transport over diesel guzzling Ford Rangers?
https://www.aa.co.nz/cars/owners/acc/
Obviously, EVs are not paying for petrol, so not being charged this portion of the taxes diverted to ACC.
So, nothing to do with the risk of the different types of vehicles – but to do with at what point the ACC levy is charged.
Yes – it's working as intended. It's a war on the state doing anything much, other than vigorously enhancing and supporting private property rights and running a police force, a justice system and a prison system to enforce them. It's very retrograde and a million miles from the unglamorous slog of public servants trying the get socially useful things done.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/536551/government-goes-back-to-drawing-board-on-holidays-act
Ugh… Not that the existing Holidays Act is simple to apply in practice, but one of the things that makes it complex to apply is wanting to include fairness as part of the minimum standard. Will be interesting to see what comes out of the simplification project, but wouldn't surprise me if some groups of workers end up worse off as a result of this.
NZ workers should be very afraid at this.
ACT wants the minimum 4 week annual leave abolished and this would be the perfect way to do it – all under the guise of simplifying the holidays act, of course.
In my view, it’s a variation of ‘justice delayed is justice denied’. While there’s a cost-of-living crisis and while people are hurting, financially and otherwise, the money that they’re entitled to is not necessarily changing hands. But CoC gave those poor landlords their generous handout.
Paywalled but this is the CoC in a nutshell.
https://www.thepost.co.nz/business/360516512/govt-moves-let-bosses-dock-pay-partial-strikers
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/pay-deductions-partial-strikes-be-reintroduced
1951 here we come again.
It's not new to CoC – having read the Bill, it's basically just a rehash from last time National were in government (much like a lot of their policies…).
That said, I don't agree with deductions for partial strikes since all that happens is unions advise members go on full strikes instead as it costs the same.