I trusted you so much, had so much hope you would work for a real change and address the injustices, mean ness and crime that are committed by this government!@
I am disappointed with you and Labour.
In other countries with a Labour history things are dealt with more resolutely. I hope you learn, and I share with yo u this vide:
Xtasy, (plus Robert and Paddy), is this blog a bit like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic? Fiddling whilst Rome burns? Discussing arcane ideological theories like bishops questioning how many saints can dance on the head of a needle?
Fekk I am so bored by the politics of our opposition parties, the stupidity of trying to change the status quo for the same staus quo (lite). Time for Jacinda et al to go forth permanently, they have outlived their usefulness, their current paradigm is passe, finito.
–Ill assume you were not being serious X – Jacinda is a product of the system, and has been playing politics for well more than half her adult life already, aty the age of just over 30.
Not even a spoonful of sugar could help
By Guy McPherson August 10, 2012
Television anchor Edward R. Murrow is credited with this expression: “Just because your voice reaches halfway around the world doesn’t mean you are wiser than when it reached only to the end of the bar.”
Murrow understood the power of television to misinform the masses. This strategy has worked brilliantly on every front, but none more pronounced than the all-important issue of global climate change. Seeking “balance” on the idiot box has meant presenting two sides to a one-sided issue until it’s become too late to address the crisis.
Extinction by 2030? Not likely. Unless by “our extinction” he means industrialised society, which I’d give 50/50 odds by 2030. But humans will live for at least a century or two more, easily.
We’re headed for extinction via nuclear meltdown
Safely shuttering a nuclear power plant requires a decade or two of careful planning. Far sooner, we’ll complete the ongoing collapse of the industrial economy. This is a source of my nuclear nightmares.
When the world’s 443 nuclear power plants melt down catastrophically, we’ve entered an extinction event. Think clusterfukushima, times 400 or so. Ionizing radiation could, and probably will, destroy every terrestrial organism and, therefore, every marine and freshwater organism. That, by the way, includes the most unique, special, intelligent animal on Earth.
Living in areas far away from the nuclear contaminants should be fairly doable. Higher risk of cancer and such but humans have survived with far higher mortality rates than the present.
yeah – people have moved (illegally) back into the chernobyl exclusion zone.
Another reason tobacco should be fine – it only knocks years off your life if you were going to live past 50 without getting terminal thyroid cancer anyway 🙂
Are they able to grow all their own food there? ‘Cos that’s the scenario that McPherson is on about. We have to live in the radiation soup, and grow all our food there. Not much left in the way of modern medicine either presumably.
I’d like to see someone knowledgeable compare Chernobyl to what McPherson is suggesting in terms of radiation levels, exposures over time, multiple events over time etc.
It was a documentary on chernobyl a few years back – an old couple in particular had moved back in and were whiling away their days with vege gardens and home-distilled potato vodka 🙂
The Japanese studied butterflies near the nuclear contamination sites. In the first generation 10% had smaller wings. The second generation 33% mutations and many of them didn’t get to grow up. Report I caught on news this morning on Radionz.
That’s a nice little Pollyanna approach Lan…unfortunately there are such nasty little things as weather patterns, ocean currents, eroded sediments, airborne dusts etc, not to mention organic things like birds moving about. Takes time, but hey, radiation generally lasts a fair while (multiple millenia), and will get spread everywhere.
Good example is Iraq: from all accounts the Iraq area is so poisoned by particulates from depleted uranium ammunition that the population will probably die off in a generation or two from birth deformities. And the area become uninhabitable for ,000s years. The radiation has already spread via carbon based life forms (Gulf War Veterans) back to the Good Ol’ USA.
“from all accounts the Iraq area is so poisoned by particulates from depleted uranium ammunition that the population will probably die off in a generation or two from birth deformities.”
For better links Google iraq radiation poisoning….you will get a whole heap of alternate sites whose reputability varies (remembering of course that the institutions of our power structures from the MSM, Pentagon down don’t want to hear or publicise this). What is striking is the number of Vets sites where US servicemen are on record as having related health issues…its Agent Orange and Vietnam all over again.
Except the mechanism of action with depleted uranium is via heavy metal poisoning via soluble oxides, though I’m unsure of the mechanism of action via inhalation or ingestion of dust*. Why? Because the half-life is so fucking large that the REM’s given off are actually pretty close to background, i.e. you’ll get a higher dosage from a cigarette or tritium paint than from DU. Which makes me very suspicious of the Geiger counter “tests” used by the radiation brigade.
Refined yellowcake is more of an issue, but that’s dosage dependant, as as far as the science available, radiation damage scales lineally to dosage, and probably the main divers are organic solvent and dioxin contamination, which is known to have major developmental biology effects and raise cancer rates very significantly.
As for long term habitability, dioxins will have the longest effect, as they’re notoriously chemically stable in the environment and frankly are best removed from ecosystems via high temperature cremation of dead keystone predators, like humans. Or high temperature baking of contaminated soils and sediments. Uranium however will likely become locked up in the sediment in clays or blown out to sea and removed via locking up of biomass in deep sea sediments. But frankly, the current issues of increasing acidification of the ocean presents a much, much, much bigger issue than highly diluted uranium contamination.
_____________________________________
*short story – lots of loosely bound outer shell electrons = very sticky molecule, and uranium has plenty of spare electrons so will form co-ordination bonds to just about anything. Which in biological organisms will gum up the works, but more so with soluble uranium ions/oxides. Dust inhalation I’m not sure about, probably causes inflammation and scaring though, but unsure if carcinogenic like asbestos.
All sounds very nasty when explained at the molecular level, somewhat reassuring that deep sea deposits tie up uranium…..and agree that its a (very) minor issue compared to ocean acidification and tundra methane release.
Bored, there is no doubt that the DU situation in Iraq is incredibly bad. But there is nothing in that Guardian article that says the population will die off withing a generation or two.
I heard the die off comment on radio (probably Ecoshock) and find it plausible if not (yet) proven. For my misdeeds and bad judgement I once did a pile of stat analysis on demographics and population decline, you can kill off an entire population in a remarkably short generational time with significant causes of mortality and non replacement etc. I was hoping we could apply this principle to possums as opposed to Iraqis…
I do take your point, I must not postulate until proven… nor predict dire outcomes on the precautionary principle even when they are extremely likely or obvious. Foresight… that’s right out. Intuitive conclusions, forget it.
I read these links well prior and was somewhat alarmed. So I checked out more links and got thoroughly depressed. If it was worth a bet (i.e I could collect from you as opposed to demand something from your corpse among-st the methane cloud)…I would bet that 2035 may see the end of all we know. I am getting sick of mindless optimism, and nice little plays around soon to be defunct political parties and their machinery. We drive, the ocean dies, get the picture?
Well you’ll be even more alarmed and depressed when you read that, according to the loons at Natural News, Bill Gates plans on eugenically culling 90% of the world’s population through the use of deadly vaccines and birth control
The world is under extreme threat. Arctic ice is disappearing faster than scientists thought it would. The possibility of trapped methane being released and triggering a run away feed back process is becoming a nightmare.
Now is the time to put away ideas of triangulating issues to gain a smaller and smaller share of the middle. Now is the time to be brave and talk about the real issues, to educate the population rather than pander to their prejudices. Now is the time to show you are ready to lead.
Now is the time to put away ideas of triangulating issues to gain a smaller and smaller share of the middle. Now is the time to be brave and talk about the real issues, to educate the population rather than pander to their prejudices.
Yes, indeed!
That NZ Herald article looks like a shortened version of this article:
The reason all this climate change is happening is partly due to our striving for full employment with a growing population.
Even the IEA have said something like BAU (full employment) = +6c by 2050 ?? it could have been 2100, whatever??, above about +1.5c – 2c = runaway, take the particulates out of the atmosphere (which industrial collapse may bring about) and we are at runaway now.
The very best we can all hope for from our near future is that New Zealand maintains a degree of law and order, and ‘humanity’ (which is a bullshit word as humans are the least ‘humane’) if we are lucky the fuckwits in Wellington have a plan B, one that gets food to the soon to be rioting masses, I wounder if anyone has done a study of how much food would be needed?
We should aim for 80% unemployment now, after all that is where we are going, so why not get use to it, if we can set up a social structure where everyone is happy doing nothing, except maybe gardening and volunteer stuff? sort of based on Cuba, then maybe we could be last ‘nation’ standing.
We would need some way of repelling refugees, and that would include all the rellys out there = 1.5 – 2 million.
Full employment = getting a payout from Kiwi Saver – an illusion
“Dr. Evelyn Forget [for-ZHAY] has conducted analysis of the research. She found that only new mothers and teenagers worked less. Mothers with newborns stopped working because they wanted to stay at home longer with their babies, and teenagers worked less because they weren’t under as much pressure to support their families, which resulted in more teenagers graduating. In addition, those who continued to work were given more opportunities to choose what type of work they did. In addition, Forget finds that in the period that Mincome was administered, hospital visits dropped 8.5 per cent, with fewer incidences of work-related injuries, and fewer emergency room visits from car accidents and domestic abuse.[1]”.
We should aim for 80% unemployment now, after all that is where we are going, so why not get use to it, if we can set up a social structure where everyone is happy doing nothing, except maybe gardening and volunteer stuff?
That’s exactly what we should be aiming for but people won’t be doing nothing. Think art, crafts, culture research and development. The stuff that progresses a society without destroying the environment.
It’s curious that both Stuff and the Herald have articles this morning focusing on the dire state of employment opportunities in NZ, though each article takes a different angle.
Stuff focuses on a couple of recently graduated individuals, with masters degrees who can’t find employment, indicating that this is the case for many graduates with more than one degree:
A double degree or even a masters may not be enough for university students to break into a job in their chosen fields as the job market worsens, long after the recession officially ended.
…
Some university graduates say they have spent months looking for work, after years in study, but have given up and returned to get higher degrees to improve their chances. The jobless rate for those aged 20 to 24 is improving, but remains high at 12 per cent.
…
“People said why don’t you work in McDonald’s or as a labourer, but I haven’t spent five years studying to do work I could have done straight out of high school,” Mr Fanselow said.
“It’s a catch-22. People want you to have experience, but no-one wants to give you a chance to get experience.”
The Herald article focuses on the occupations that are diminishing in NZ due to taking jobs offshore, or businesses using the internet or IT in order to cut back on the costs of employing actual people in NZ:
If you’re a travel agent or an accountant, you could be facing “extinction” by 2017.
Car manufacturers, retail and IT workers may also need to start thinking about a new career path as consumers increasingly turn to the internet for services and employers outsource for cheaper labour.
…
The jobs that will survive were those that required a human touch such as hospitality workers, tourism operators, tradesmen, logistics workers, aged and health care and government workers including politicians.
Oh, look, government workers, which the government is trying to cut back on, could be a sustainable employment area….. ????!!
Maybe more of the unemployed should seek to become politicians? Could they do worse than the current lot?
But, seriously, NZ’s whole approach to employment needs a big overhaul, with the aim of keeping Kiwis employed in NZ….. and jobs with a human touch are jobs for the future of a healthy and sustainable society.
It’s not just employment but the entire economy. Doing things with less people is good. Having the wealth then go only to the few while denigrating those that can’t find work (because there isn’t any due to the capitalists accumulating the wealth) is bad.
On the education issue – It’s why if I get back to uni (damn thee depression, again) I’ll be aiming for a Masters of Science and then fucking off overseas if I can. Unless you’re lucky and know the right people, you oft need to have prior experience.
On the job extinction issue – ironically outsourcing will probably cost more in the long term due to distance issues. Particularly with IT, where there’s only so much you can do remotely vis troubleshooting over the phone, where it’s a lot faster to do everything you need to if the computer is actually in front of you. And frankly, the only remote management you should have is that for the server, and it needs to be locked up tight, otherwise you’ve got even more means for arse-hats to gain access. As for outsourcing programming etc, ye gads, it’s straight economic exploitation, and if you’re going to pay peanuts, expect issues a plenty arising with complex code bases and applications.
As for retail – you still need people for the backend with internet stores, as failure to respond to customer issues and returns in a humane fashion* results in a drop off in business or extinction. Also, people will pay premiums for staff help on a variety of products, so I don’t see retail dying off completely anytime soon.
Actually, I’m wondering just what teh fuck Balance Recruitment is basing these claims on, and if they’ll stand up to critical investigation…
_____________________________________________
*Yes, customers can be arsehats in the extreme, but those ones you can have “fun” with, however ignorance is not a reason to treat customers like crap and doing so will cause your business to start flagging
NZ’s whole approach to employment needs a big overhaul
I commented on another thread about differences in employment support where I live. Essentially:
– Unions are voluntary, but with high membership rates
– however belonging to the Chamber of Labour, a policy think tank for employees, is compulsory.
– long-term unemployed are re-trained – quickly.
– government policy is analysed for impacts on employment and adjusted if needs be.
– job subsidisation as required
– collectively agreed (not legislated) minimum wages cover 98% of the workforce
– technical training
– support for small industries and little outsourcing
Point to note – all employment policy is consensus-driven agreements between government, employers and employees. Effect on jobs is a priority consideration in legislation. This sort of policy equates to a 4.5% unemployment rate in the centre of the Eurozone. I’m trying not to harp on – but it’s all so damn do-able. There are a couple of links on the other comment, if you’re interested.
John Ansell is proposing a “Colourblind’ campaign to address “Treatygate”, including an advertising campaign and petition in the hopes of getting a CIR.
It explains the double-pronged campaign I’m planning to end the Treaty Grievance Industry.
But What Can We Do?
It will take money, but I believe the secret of success is a powerful public education campaign using the plainest of English, rolling out one fascinating fact, one ad or poster at a time.
The goal is to get sheepish Kiwis, ‘the Passionless People’, to understand what has been done to them, and to tell their politicians, “We’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take it any more!”
If we can make Treatygate a Top Three issue when the big parties do their polling, then our leaders will have no choice but to listen and act.
Here’s the plan…
How to Defeat the Con
1. Launch Colourblind New Zealand, and set a goal to lock in one law for all by December 2014.
2. Raise a $2 million fighting fund so the politicians know we’re able to embarrass them.
3. Petition for a referendum at the 2014 election. Question: “Do you want New Zealand to be a Colourblind State, with one law for all, and no racial favouritism of any kind?”
4. How to make the PM obey the referendum result? Run lots of bold Treatygate ads telling voters just who has been conning them, and how.
5. If media refuse to run these ads, use rival media to expose them as part of the con.
6. Bombard government MPs with instructions from their voters to obey their will.
7. Support local body campaigns on Maori wards (typically attracting an 80% NO vote).
With your support I hope to work full-time on this project until we achieve a Colourblind New Zealand.
The racially-rigged Constitutional Advisory Panel has already begun the process of changing the constitution by stealth, meeting mainly with Maori groups in contravention of its pledge to meet a wide range of New Zealanders.
Ansell might get a bit of suport on the right fringe but mainstream New Zealand is unlikely to buy into his extreme dream.
He will have a lot of trouble raising money for this, and even more trouble getting enough people to volunteer their time to get signatures. But even proposing this he is going to get a bit of attention, the problem (for him) is it is most is likely to be negative.
you’ll be in won’t you pete – fits in with your attitude and position of creating hostility between people. Ansell is so broken I’m sure other broken people will love him and his racism.
The only thing I’ve supported Ansell on in the past is his campaign for a decent New Zealand flag – something highlighted at the olympics where the blag flag with silver fern was far more distinctive than a look-alike with another country’s flag in the corner.
I don’t support this campaign in any way. Ansell is over the top and divisive, and has nutty ideas about the history of our country.
You will get an automatic reaction of disgust. Of course lefties hate this sort of thing. The treaty is not a con, it is the founding document for our nation. And this one law for all shyte really gets my goat. When people like Ansell advocate that rich people should at the same time lose their excessive privilege it may then be a subject to discuss but not before.
But your post has no style. It is like showing up to a wedding and passing around nude photos of the bride.
You’re wasting your time, Paddy. Pete is a lying racist who’s own site has many posts about bloody maari’s (myself included, weirdly) and he loves this kind of divisive claptrap. You’ll have noticed he claims to not support Ansell, but he has spread this filth as widely as possible. Just a linkwhoring t 🙄
+ 1 yes pete is the lowest racist scum around – that’s why he puts it there – to anger people, agitate them, create division – he gets physically excited by it – really makes his day.
I used to think that Pete was just stupid and dull, but I agree with you now marty (and you’ve been saying this for some time). He really is a nasty piece of work, made worse because he is wrapped up in middle of the road crap. At least with people like Ansell and Crimp everyone can see what arseholes they are.
But it is hardly surprising that these issues keep arising. They represent unresolved issues around race in aotearoa and the inappropriate form of the treaty, as I keep suggesting from time to time.
Until these issues are resolved these things will keep coming up. Long time yet methinks.
I don’t want to get into a big thing with you vto but consider your comment – “they represent unresolved issues around race in Aotearoa” and who is raising this – the supporters. They have issues and they are, as you say, “fucken ignorant”. I have been trying for (it seems like) years to get you to see this point.
” They represent unresolved issues around race in aotearoa and the inappropriate form of the treaty”
No they don’t. They represent the very small minority of people in NZ who think that Maori shouldn’t exist. That is what Ansell is talking about – he’s a white supremacist who wants Maori to become white (but poor and white no doubt) or just disappear altogether. ‘Colourblindness’ is code for making everyone white.
Why you would want to align yourself with the likes of him and Crimp is beyond me.
The difference between the Neo-Liberals and the Left is their perceptions of the seriousness of our economic problems.
If this is just a recession like all others, the Neo-Liberals can argue for tinkering while the economy fixes itself.
If this is much worse, a deflationary depression, the state MUST intervene by employing people rather than laying them off. It must take control of the banking and credit system. It must structurally change the system as was done by Micky Savage and FDR.
The 1930’s Great Depression led to dramatic state changes in every country. In countries where the state did not intervene to re-distribute opportunities, violent revolutions led to dictatorships. That will soon be our choice: make peaceful changes which will piss off the rich and powerful OR descend into anarchy.
Well, after 5 years its clearly not a recession like all others. It also is not a classic deflationary depression as the cost of living has been going up not down – however income deflation is certainly occurring.
One difference to the 1930’s – we no longer have mass organisations representing workers and the unemployed who can bring extreme pressure to bear on political leaders.
This is a famous story:
Go Ahead, Make Me
“I agree with you, I want to do it, now make me do it.”
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Comment to a group of reformers. His point: Until they lead the way, they shouldn’t expect political leaders to follow.
“Five years on from what is considered the start of the credit crunch – dubbed “the day the world changed” by the former boss of Northern Rock … On 9 August 2007, the final wake-up call to the world’s banking system occurred after many early warnings over the toxic nature of high-risk mortgage debt. “Sub-prime” was about to enter the vocabulary. … Since the crunch, house prices have fallen, consumer confidence has plummeted and prices and unemployment have risen. … the economy continues to falter …”
I’m not sure that it’s as simple as suggesting that the “Left” don’t espouse Neo-Liberal values (ie. there’s a difference) unless of course there is a belief that there is not a true Left leaning party currently in NZ?
Whilst not with the ideological fervour of NACT, both Labour and the Greens still advocate a perpetuation of the existing economic direction that characterises what has been popularised as “Neo-Liberal”. Granted there are some differences around the fringes but there is nothing that I have seen in their economic policies that I would consider revolutionary nor a step away from neo-liberalism.
Undoubtedly its an oversimplification but I view modern Labour and National as two sides of the same coin. Perhaps this is due to the focus on the centrist vote and the continual move of what society would consider “centre” in a rightward direction?
AmaKiwi
While the right were putting up state rents and decreasing everything else decades ago, and there was an effort to protest against loss of jobs there was very little response from the NZ public. Affordable housing is essential but there was little reaction against market rents by the RWNJs back then. Jobs, oh well. If you’ve got what you want it’s all SEP (someone elses problem).
The retired need to push the government to keep the business market going so there is employment available and tax to pay old age pensions which are like PAYE but more truly PATE (the t being they, the others) despite the lovely fantasy that paying 8% of 1950’s wages set up a pension fund now worth billions. Fantasy but that idea still floats.
The young need to claim their birthright – a job which will enable them to earn and live with comfort and be regarded as an integral part of a clever flourishing nation. Everyone has a skill and needs to be doing something. That old saying that idle hands mean trouble wasn’t wrong.
The rest of NZ should be looking at the health of our economy, at the waste of lives and potential if the economy isn’t run properly to keep it ticking during the worst times. Whether anyone can be bothered till confronted with disaster I don’t know. I do a little myself and should do more, and some never do anything. Short sighted to let this slide continue though.
There was an interview about recidivist drinking drivers this morning on Radionz. A statistic that $1 million is being allocated this year for the 30,000 people convicted of this, and the 10,000 approx recidivists. Just how much money does government rake in from alcohol tax??
And the judges do not generally include treatment and education about alcohol in their decisions when convicting, one because our justice system concentrates on the punitive and secondly, because there aren’t enough treatment facilities anyway. A really vicious circle. The saying that if you don’t change anything then you’ll always get the same result rules.
No wonder we are a small country that couldn’t. Because we don’t (think, make a plan, act to pilot it, monitor efficacy and then embody in law what works best and fairly). So we don’t get off our arses and do something, just use the opportunity of failure somewhere to criticise and fault the perpetrator (if it isn’t one of our social class or schoolmates from the ‘right’ background.)
Then we don’t have to work for a better system WE JUST BLAME THE INDIVIDUAL and do bloody nothing of any rational worth.
Recidivist drink drivers are a major danger on the roads according to statistics.
High-risk drink-drivers cause almost two-thirds of fatal crashes where alcohol is a contributing factor and new figures on the country’s recidivist drivers do “not make pretty reading”, a top road policing manager says.
A Ministry of Transport report shows that between 2006 and 2010, there were 576 deaths in crashes where alcohol was a contributing factor.
The majority of those deaths – 364 (63%) – were in crashes caused by a high-risk driver who had either a blood-alcohol level at least 50% over the adult legal limit or a prior alcohol offence.
So – I am in moderation for 😀 ? What the frak, seriously?
Having read the explanation that it’s because I am on dial up, I started using my son’s vodem, and am now on broadband.
So, what the frak. seriously?
You’ll find that there is a auto-moderation discrimination against anything that gets a new IP number virtually everytime that they connect. That includes most ways of accessing the 3G networks that give a different IP each connection. I refer to all of those as dial up.
ADSL and most continuous broad band wireless will have only a single IP number for weeks at a time if you aren’t powering them down. Consequently there is less chance that it’s IP or IP range has recently been used by a spammer.
If you think of it from a spammers viewpoint, they prefer to have a different IP all the time – it makes blocking them harder. But it also means that they coat all dial up IP ranges with anti spam auto moderation.
The only time I get moderation on sites that allow comments without logins like ours is when I am using my cell phone as a wireless access point. My own mail server regularly requires a higher verification from me before it will accept my mail fom my phone…
But I see that r0b located a local moderation match – hopefully for the vodem.
The only time I get moderation on sites that allow comments without logins
Two things – I am always logged in (I don’t post if I am not) and also, basically, what you say, is that your moderation system discriminates against people who can’t afford “ADSL and most continuous broad band wireless”!
My choices are dial up ($9.95 a month) or the Vodafone vodem (paid for by someone else).
This really tells me a lot about the SES of Standardistas! I assume those on UB/SB nevertheless have family/spouses who help support them, or are actually on National Super. ADSL and most continuous broad band wirelessis at least $80.00 a month, which is more than my usual power bill, so is right out of the question.
Vicky, I’ve no idea how much your paying for your phone line and so on. But Orcon has broadband that includes your phone and free national calls for $75 per month on a 12 month contract with 2 months free service to new customers.
So with the two free months, it equates to something just below $65 per month for phone + broadband? I don’t know – maybe still beyond you financially.
( 🙄 Can’t believe I essentially advertised. Must never happen again! )
And $5 per month less if you use your own phone with it which is to be recommended – I didn’t like their phone at all.
You probably need a cell though, because (and I don’t know if there is some reason peculiar to me) the “naked” phone goes down about once every couple of months. If the internet is down at the same time you need to be able to contact faults.
But Orcon has broadband that includes your phone and free national calls for $75 per month on a 12 month contract with 2 months free service to new customers.
That sounds good, but I would not want to commit to that until/unless I have permanent work. As it is, I pay around $45 a month for my phone and $9.95 for dial up, (I have my own phone) and I do have a mobile… )
The reason I wouldn’t want to commit to something like that, is that presently, I can juggle if necessary – but with a firm contract, I couldn’t juggle…. F’r instance, at present, if I am better off than usual, that is, I’ve just had work, I prepay 3 months dial up, but if I haven’t had work, I can find $9.95 down the back of the couch, essentially! Thanks for letting me know, anyway…
I don’t. The automatic systems do. However they prevent massive numbers of spam here.
You are confusing an explanation with a choice… Tell you what. I could probably divert all of the spam to you to sort through manually? At present I think we’re dumping between 10 and 20k comments a month, all except less than 1% happens automatically using our systems. It is fascinating stuff to read for the first day..
/sarc
It isn’t about you, so please stop doing the victim silliness. It is about protecting the site. You and everyone else who gets caught in moderation just get caught in the crossfire. It isn’t going to change because the alternates are a damn sight worse.
I am tired of explaining this to you via the site and via email…
It isn’t about you, so please stop doing the victim silliness. It is about protecting the site. You and everyone else who gets caught in moderation just get caught in the crossfire.
Eseentially, whatever!
If you accuse me of silliness, well I might as well be silly, right? If you think what I was doing was claiming victimhood, then there’s nothing I can do. Think as you choose. You will note, I hope (but also doubt) that I never said I believed it was ‘all about me’.
A large segment of Al Jazeera’s and Al Arabiya’s audiences, appalled by the Syrian regime’s brutality, no doubt genuinely believes that this is strictly a battle of good versus evil. For the Saudi and Qatari governments, however, Syria’s fate directly affects their political future — they want to see the fall of the regime for either personal or strategic reasons.
Al Jazeera had all the beginnings of becoming a decent, mostly independent news source in the Middle East that you could rely on somewhat to provide the raw story on the ground and has done a string of brilliant new-docus on social issues around the world and in the ME. Yet we see Qatar thinks they can push a particular editorial line and get away with it and influence public opinion, despite the fact that a lot of opposition organisation in the region occurs via grass-roots social networks, which due to their very nature are somewhat difficult to manipulate into pulling the party line. And tend to spread their views around.
As for why they don’t want to mention the issues with foreign Jihadi’s, it comes down to the simple fact these foreign fighters get their money for weapons etc from Gulf State “charitable” organisations. Despite being oft complete fucking monsters who care not for civilian causalities and ironically what to be rid of the Saudi and Gulf state governments.
Time to leave, just get the hell out, there’s nothing there for NZ, hell we barely even trade with them. Now I know we originally went in to help with the rebuild, then Key and Co sent in the SAS so then all NZ soldiers became targets of revenge. And now we lose 2 more young men, sent to a war for what? an ideal? nope a lie, a great big fat American lie. and now the man who sends them off to die in the name of this lie doesn’t even attend their funerals
And the Yanks are losing men at a great rate it’s the same as in Iraq one huge army up against a lot of little factions who won?? Have you ever seen footage of a Lion trying to defend a Kill? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p1cVZprJMw
The Americans are the Lions.
Well it was nice while it lasted. I see we’re now back in full Pete George thread hog mode. 9 instances of ‘pete’ in 33 posts = 27%. Still, it’s only just morning tea time.
They should send Curiosity back to Earth, arriving in 2035 or there abouts to record what a methane planet looks like. When intelligent life re-emerges from the primordial ooze in a few million years they can review the strange ape animals demise, as recorded by Curiosity.
have to laugh at petey’s support of ansell over replacing the new zealand flag.
a clear case of external referencing.
its not what the damn flag looks like, it is what it stands for that counts.
You lot were mentioned on Radio NZ National this morning. You must be pleased. Of course your views were largely dissmissed as having no real importance. At least you were mentioned though.
Hey, TS got a mention on RNZ, by Mathew Hooten 🙄 (a la generic truck driver voter isn’t reading thestandard.org).
The ‘left’ commentator, Josie Pagani just defended Shearer’s comments about the SB guy painting his roof, on the basis that Labour can’t stand up for valid beneficiaries unless it also talks about responsibilities 🙄 :roll:, thus completely missing the point and affirming bene and disability bashing as fair sport on the left.
A tad late there weka and also you have seemingly missed the entire point that was being made about The Standard by both Pagani and Hooten. But no worries I’ll paraphrase it for you . Most of you lot are too extreme and keeping you lot happy doesn’t win elections. The people who do make a difference in elections don’t tend to read The Standard.
I’ve never doubted that when it comes to elections I’m not really in the mix for determining the outcome. I am pretty much a given in the right column. It is the undecideds in the middle that really count. People who flip flop from left to right and back again. Pagani pointed out this mythical hard left non-voter that some here, (and on other left wing blog sites), hope to inspire doesn’t really exist. Most of the non-voters are centrists.
Grosman
Most of the Non Voters (ENVs) are uninspired by centrists. That is why they are not voting.
Yes, most are not doctrinaire left-wing chatting about the dialectic over a Tui. They are Kiwi’s who feel disenfranchised by the current centrist politics. Their number is substantially larger that the swingers who went for John Keys’s BS. They feel rooted and dis-owned by National and Labour: they would prefer to vote for Winston or an anarchist than come out to vote for a centrist.
The message for swinging centrist middle-classes is very different from the message for the ENVs. Their needs are so different.
Real Labour value should and can connect with these potential voters, without alienating the far smaller group of swingers.
Gosman, I’m fairly sure that I was the first person to post on the RNZ reference to TS and say something of actual substance.
I got the point. But it wasn’t what you said. Both Hooten and Pagani were dismissing the left blogosphere because what it was saying didn’t support their views. Obviously lots of things influence voters, but to say that the political discourse (of which TS is part) in this country is irrelevant is pretty stupid. It would be like saying that RNZ’s political commentator spot is irrelevant.
Besides, I was specifically commenting on Pagani’s defense of bene/disability bashing.
Do you disagree that both commentators on that show dissmissed The Standard as having no real sway over the key voters for determining the outcome of elections in NZ?
I’m saying it was a strawman argument on their part.
Personally I think in tight elections (like the last one), the polls and media have the most influence over which way elections go, which is a fucking anti-democratic travesty.
Personally I think in tight elections (like the last one), the polls and media have the most influence over which way elections go, which is a fucking anti-democratic travesty.
I think this is a big issue, and a few tweaks to how we do MMP won’t change this. It’s how we (MPS, media and voters) use MMP that matters.
Once the MMP review is complete we should be looking at how the eventual system can best 9and most democratically) be utilised.
Thinking we can somehow get an ‘independent’ media is as much a fool’s game. We have many types of media with many degrees of independence.
Most mainstream media is commercial so can be influenced by consumers, if they choose. And social media is has an increrasing influence on people in general and on MSM.
We can hope that one day we might get a government that might change the media mix a bit. Or we can look at how to work with the media we have.
Pete drove UF’s vote down to 183. His own showing was even worse, 176. Mind you the 7 vote difference can be partially explained by him not voting for himself anyway! I’m looking forward to him reducing National’s vote in a similar way next election, if he ever gets his fantasy fulfilled by that nice John Key 🙄 .
Most mainstream media is commercial so can be influenced by consumers, if they choose.
No it can’t. The commercial MSM is run by the rich to benefit the rich. Being influenced by the consumer won’t benefit the rich. That is also the reason why we have representative democracy.
Hooters loves the Standard, mainly because he gets taken seriously here. And at least he was upfront yesterday on the telly about the end of United Future and ACT and the need for Key to dickylick Winston for the next two years. Top bloke!
I’d disagree that the people who decide elections don’t visit the Standard. Where else are the political media going to get their stories from?
+1 People would be surprised at how influential a blog can be, not only on the public but on the media and politicians as well…. Mainly because most of them cannot think for themselves.
Where else are the political media going to get their stories from?
They certainly seem to be somewhat interested in the site.
Gosman: Do you disagree that both commentators on that show dissmissed The Standard as having no real sway over the key voters for determining the outcome of elections in NZ?
We have something in the order of 30 to 40 thousand people reading the site every month. Of course we don’t have a real sway over voters because there are 3 million voters. Nor do any of the political blogs in NZ or anywhere else that I’m aware of. The readerships are simply too small. For that matter you could as easily argue that editorials in newspapers and opinion pieces in newspapers have an small influence as well. The readers of those are pretty small in terms of voters as well. Same for radio and almost every current affairs programme.
About the only ones that have a widespread audience are the TV news programmes. Of course those are so mindlessly soundbitten that they really offer little of substance.
But all of these provide material for voters to talk to each other. That is usually the only thing that significantly influences voters.
Rather pointless assertion. As TRP said, any influence this site has on voters is exerted through journalists and activists rather than direct to voters. Most voters haven’t even been on a blog
Take your concerns up with Matthew Hooten and Josie Pagani then. I think their point is this site tends to attract the hard core left activists rather than the moderate center of the road voter who might be tempted to vote National as well as Labour. Certainly I haven’t seen anybody making a comment here that fits that description. Not to state that they don’t browse the site from time to time.
I’ve voted National and Labour and could be in a situation to consider either again in the future. I’m variously labeled (here) as anywhere from centre to hard right. That’s just relative to the labeller, I agree that most active commenters here appear to be more hard core left activists.
It occurs to me that it would probably never occur to Gosman that a political and/or idealogical blog/discussion board/opinion-site/whatever can exist simply for the purpose of providing and facilitating a place where that discussion happens. Most right-leaning individuals of my acquaintance seem particularly ‘results-oriented’ and would probably conclude that “if their is no voter gain or profit then what is the point, why would you get involved”
It must of taken alot of brains to work that out pete.
Its better than being a hard core w$$$e like you and your hard core neo liboral paid for by the giant corporations that rip the lungs out of economies .
Vampire capitalism.
Led by Mitt the Twit at the moment.
The werewolf of London.He will rip the lungs out of the us economy.
Bain capital A predatory corporate that asset stripped good American businesses for quick dollars.
I’m not against business, unbridled capitalism it ruins good business by creating global monopolies!
that’s not what Adam Smith said either,he was anti monopoly as well, healthy competition is a good thing
Just about all the countries we trade with Are ruining our economy with some sort of tariff, money printing (devaluing),Subsidies, Huge military spending ,Corruption!
So we are the only mugs on the planet by playing to all the rules when no one else is .
Amusingly, the take-away from this morning’s chat is that the political media and the Labour and National PR people who presumably do have some sort of influence do pay close attention to this blog and others.
It takes a special kind of dullness of the mind to be able to have that conversation on National Radio and not pick up on the inherent irony of the situation, but I suppose they only need to be as smart as each other.
Amusingly, the take-away from this morning’s chat is that the political media and the Labour and National PR people who presumably do have some sort of influence do pay close attention to this blog and others.
And how impressed do you think they’ll be with the standard of discourse here? It more often resembles Mallard’s political kindergarten than a flagship think tank of the left.
As lprent intimates, this is only a very small bubble in the whole scheme of things, and one that’s often unattractive to the outside.
You may not have noticed but the overwhelming majority of flame wars that occur here have one common feature, you.
Others here are obviously convinced that you are here only to make trouble and disrupt with your passive aggressive and snidely rascist comments. For example have a look at the way you posted Ansell’s comments this morning.
Rather than continuing to blame the very solid leftys that comment here perhaps your search for someone to blame should be more inwardly focussed.
micky, you may not have noticed but the overwhelming majority of flame wars are one sided attempts, and often with only one aim, to attack me regardless of what I post. If you look just below here I posted something and the usual trolls attacked, and the exact same topic was deliberately re-raised and discussed.
If you want to be an exclusive club of hard lefties that harrasses off anyone you take a dislike to then you need to be more upfront.
Why “The Standard”?
The Standard newspaper – from where our masthead comes – was founded by labour movement activists in the 1930s. They used it as a vehicle to share their views with a broader audience – a perspective they felt the mainstream media was representing poorly. We think the same is true today.
Maybe the blog has evolved since that ideal. If you want to be narrow minded and nasty don’t try and pretend to yourselves you ‘re a flagship for the broad left.
Much of the active comment here would not appeal to most potential Labour or Green voters. Nor would the behaviour.
Negative attack politics seems to be the core activity, in posts and comments. I just happen to attract some of it, but it’s far more pervasive than that. If that’s how you want to be then fair enough, but it doesn’t seem to satisfy many of you, this place oozes discontent and bitterness.
You’ll attract better if you act better. If that’s what you want.
[lprent: Re-read what you quoted. Even after all of this time and for that matter bans for it, you appear to be trying to spin what this site is about.
We’re not trying to talk to “potential Labour or Green voters”. We are trying to spread the perspective of “labour movement activists”. You appear to be such a political newbie that you have not realized that these are two radically different things.
We simply don’t care except in general terms about getting the voters voting because we’re not a political party and that isn’t our task. Sure some of us do that in other roles. But this site is here to allow people on the left to play with ideas and argue. We make it public so that people can see what we’re interested in and are arguing about. We rather enjoy having people of other political bents coming in and arguing provided that they can argue and follow our site rules.
What you seem to fail to understand is that as well as putting up ideas for criticism, there are objectives of the site includes pointing out the flaws of political policies, flawed economics, political idiots, brown-nosing journos, and outright thickheads like yourself. This is because those are also part of the political process, which is something that you seem to prefer that others do not do. Most people around here have long since concluded that is because you hate mirrors….
I’d ask if you get the point, but it is quite apparent that you never do think on what others say. For some reason you appear to think that examining and expressing your own unthinking and often bigoted ideas about the left is a preferable technique to listening to others or actually thinking.
Permanent ban for yet again trying to tell us what we should be doing with the site. I’m tired of it and I really don’t think you’re capable of either learning or holding your end up in any kind of discussion. ]
Have you ever thought of applying any of your very helpful advice to your own behaviour? Cos seriously mate, your comments lately are reading like the notes from a therapy session.
Have you ever countenanced the slightest possibility that your commenting habits may in the slightest way contributes to the opprobrium that you experience?
Ever had that nagging doubt?
Ever thought the passive aggressive racist dog whistling might actually upset many?
Ever thought that the snide holier than thou retorts on how terrible we all are you then come out with might actually harden attitudes?
I never thought it would happen to me. I was t:roll:ing away as usual, when all of a sudden I received a permanent ban! Oh wow, I felt so proud! I thought I was really sticking it to those lefties, ramming my point home again and again, paying close attention over hours, days, even weeks, and finally they said they couldn’t take it any more! I feel so proud – I immediately came! Here! And the best thing is, it makes me an oppressed mass, and bad boys are cool. I’m just like Mr Fifty Cents. More at yourpimpingNZ.cum.
Negative attack politics seems to be the core activity, in posts and comments. I just happen to attract some of it, but it’s far more pervasive than that. If that’s how you want to be then fair enough, but it doesn’t seem to satisfy many of you, this place oozes discontent and bitterness.
Sadly true!
Going to permaban me, then? Go ahead, make my point!
As it seems I am on permanent moderation, what difference will it actually make?
Vicky the thing is that Petey does not “happen to attract some of it”, he sets out with the intent of, if at all possible, getting negative comments. It is a real wankfest for him. The rest of us hate it, we would prefer to debate the issues. He then does this passive aggressive stuff and suggests he is the victim. He is not. He is a silly person who does not realise that if he wants a debate he will get one but if he wants to tr0ll he will get dumped on.
And how impressed do you think they’ll be with the standard of discourse here? It more often resembles Mallard’s political kindergarten than a flagship think tank of the left.
As lprent intimates, this is only a very small bubble in the whole scheme of things, and one that’s often unattractive to the outside.
Yeah. I mean he’s a reactionary self-obsessed bigot who displays an embarrassing lack of comprehensive ability while trying to present himself as the lone voice of sensibility in a world gone mad, whereas you’re not like that at all.
Ummm I am only intimate with Lyn and my family. There are very few other people who have met me, even fewer who know that they have, and not many people who aren’t programmers who know much about me (code is an extremely effective mechanism at reading core personality).
Most of the authors have met me only a few times at best and bugger all commentators ever have. Virtually everything that most people here know about me is visible on the web, and most of any perceived favoritism is purely accidental (apart from authors) as I haven’t found anything to be savage to them about.
Possibly, but I bet some of them also keep a close eye on midget porn and George W. Bush Supporter Blogs but that doesn’t mean they take them seriously.
It would be, at this stage with all evidence pointing to the contrary, quite a large hubris on the part of people at The Standard to consider themselves anything other than a weird microcosm of what the (mostly) far left get up to when the have the run of the coop.
But whatever, be what you want, little man. Never give up!
Frankly they’d be crazy not to keep an eye on midget porn. And yeah I understand that the fact that things are read doesn’t necessarily equate to them being taken seriously, and it would take a very naive person to believe otherwise.
But it would be just as naive to say that professional lobbyists, PR people working for political parties, and high-profile mainstream journalists are regularly reading The Standard but only for amusement.
Wouldn’t you say?
ps I’m assuming “midget porn and George W. Bush Supporter Blogs” refers to two things, not one.
I’d disagree that the people who decide elections don’t visit the Standard. Where else are the political media going to get their stories from?
Well, I hope they have a high tolerance for sweary ad hominens and juvenile abuse…
Personally, I’d lift my game and stop being such a self-loving boy, were I some of the most-loved posters here, and wanted to be taken seriously by the genuinely uncommitted.
Well, it was more or less the same anecdote that she put up on her facebook page. Her’s didn’t have a roof in it, but the thrust was identical – decent hard working kiwis resenting anyone defending bludgers.
You got a link for that? Just having a look at her FB page and can’t find it.
She’s got from pretty unintelligent stabs at the Greens though. I don’t know much about her, but she doesn’t come across as too bright. ‘We can dismiss everything Gordon Campbell says because he’s a Green’ kind of thing.
Pagani wants to emulate the “success” of the UK Labour Party, begun with Kinnock (she claims) and culminating in Blair and his destruction of grass-roots democracy in the UK Labour Party? Really?
And times have changed since Kinnock’s days at the early period in the rise of neoliberalism.
As someone somewhere in TS comments pointed out, the line Shearer used was then same one Josie Pagani had used in her blog some tme back. So, of course she would defend it seeing as how Shearer was spoon fed the line by her dipshit sidekick on the grounds it was a good strategic position to take.
edit Sorry Olwyn. Didn’t see you’d re-highlighted the fact
Nah, I think Olwyn meant the piece I linked to, which was in the Herald, not fb. It got a good going over here at TS at the time. There is simply no similarity to what Shearer said, so those commenters who claimed that Shearer has nicked her story are wrong.
This appeals to the same sentiment, even if the details and benefit are different:
“The hardest week to door-knock was when we were telling people – who had just come home from a day’s work earning the minimum wage – that it was a great idea to extend their Working for Families tax credit to beneficiaries. “So what’s the point of working my guts out all week while someone sitting at home on the dole gets the same tax credit as me?”
I guess it depends on whether she was reporting a fact or advocating a position based on that fact. The quote suggests the former, but there seems to be a lean toward the latter on the RNZ segment.
This is something I also find worrying, and apparently it is coming up in England as well. It is the shift in focus from “those who must sell their labour to live” to “those who work.” And when the speaker smells a challenge coming up, they add something along the lines of “Of course we care about unemployment and we intend to grow the economy.”
Step one, the shift of focus, deftly slices off those who must sell their labour in a market with few buyers. Step two pretends that growing the economy is automatically a response to unemployment, when it is not. What is called growth now is normally the concentration of wealth into fewer hands, with no substantial employment prospects attached, except perhaps in the designing, building and furnishing of McMansions in ex-working class areas.
If you read the rest of the article that Olwyn linked above/below (?), you will see Pagani is advocating a position – and, most disgustingly one that claims the Labour Party are for working people, and, thus, the plight of unemployed beneficiaries, are really not what Labour’s about….although she does confuse the issue a bit by saying that Labour will always be there for working people when the jobs disappear.
Pagani kept going on about a truck driver she talked to who said that National was for the rich and Labour was for beneficiaries, and nobody’s there for him…. so Pagani takes this as fact? Instead of challenging such false perceptions? She then says Shearer’s reference to the roof-painting beneficiary was to assure the truck driver, that beneficiaries have also to show some responsibility…?
I would have thought the first thing Labour (or an opposition) should do, is challenge the Truck-driver’s false perceptions, and look wider at the perceptions of diverse people. Labour is hardly being the champion of beneficiaries – more it’s been targeting the middleclasses.
At least the truck driver has a job, that pays reasonably well.
Pagani’s constant repetition of the truck driver anecdote was just plain irritating in so many ways.
And the dismissal of TS participants as the extreme of the left that few ordinary Kiwis take note of, just shows how both Pagani & Hooten are positioned more to the (mythical, or socially-constructed notion of) the “center”. These days that “centre” is the position of the MSM and leans to the neoliberal/neocon version of the “right”.
I agree Carol. I would really prefer that Labour campaigns on reality rather than feeds what are often wrong perceptions.
And as for TS participants as being described as “far left” I suggest that we should adopt that particular badge with pride! If being of the far left means dealing with reality and refusing to pander to the prejudices of the ill informed then so be it.
sheesh If TS is generally ‘far left’, then where does that leave the likes of myself and a wee few of the commentators here? ‘Outside left’ and falling off the side of Pagani’s imaginary wee flat earth?
Yeah I have a tendency to view myself as rather right in most things. But after looking at the National for a few decades, I am starting to view myself as merely a hopeless bigot against stupidity.
I’m wondering if they get all this middle class and centre rubbish from the US and A. The stories certainly sound like they’ve come from an American neocon think tank, with a few adjustments for local conditions.
Having managed to pull the plug on RadioNZ’s nine to noon i had the delight of totally missing what was said about the Standard this morning,
You can bet tho, that the weekends posts and comments had at least someone(s) sit up and take notice, (otherwise there would have been no comment made on a nation-wide radio broadcast),
What is noticeable from the Pagani’s of this world is any attempt to move the discourse away from the supposed ‘sickness beneficiary cheat’ versus the ‘heroic worker’,
It’s there that Labour want the debate held, not where it should be, the ‘real cheats’ to be found in the 7 billion dollars of due taxation criminally evaded every year in New Zealand,
Neither do Labour wish to have a conversation about the other arm of ‘tax cheating’, avoidance, where another approx: 7 billion dollars of tax is ‘legally evaded’ by the use of ‘smart’ Lawyers and accountants to manage their clients earnings in such a way as to make it ‘legal’ for them to avoid paying the due taxation,
i don’t think we, as in the broad left, should for one moment allow the Shearers, Pagani’s or anyone else the luxury and the lies of making the conversation about whether the beneficiaries are deserving of the crumbs that are swept off of the table in their direction,
What we all should be doing is keeping the pressure up on the likes of Shearer/Pagani until such time as THEY change their attitudes and begin to defend those reliant upon benefits,
The Standard tho has obviously struck a chord in at least part of the Labour Caucus, whether that chord has caused enough disquiet in ‘their’ comfortable realm to have ‘them’ re-examine ‘their’ attitude only time will tell,
i don’t believe tho, that our criticisms/critiques of where we see the Labour Caucus as having the wrong focus should be lessened nor softened…
A Christchurch “start-up” promises to mbillable fortune out of “omission free car running on compressed air”, Mesh-computing and an innovative Solar Tech. Snake-oil. It is called IndraNet.
The professionals of Christchurch gets paid hansomely to put prospectus together.
The gullibles of Christchurch put in $19m. All gone in fees and salaries to the chosen few. And $2m in debts.
Who was the advisor “in a professional legal capacity”?
Amy Adams, John Keys pick for Minister for Communications and Information Technology.
I see they think they can do broadband over power-lines…
Which is a massive pipedream due to mains power being rather “noisy”, leading to very high information loss compared to standard telephony or cat-cable connections, which have noise filtering and spike management built into the network infrastructure.
Hell, you’d be better of using Wi-Fi repeating stations, but CHCH doesn’t have the density outside of the CBD to make them economically effective for a mesh network at present.
A Christchurch “start-up” promises to make a fortune out of “omission free car running on compressed air”, Mesh-computing and an innovative Solar Tech. Snake-oil. It is called IndraNet.
The professionals of Christchurch gets paid hansomely to put prospectus together.
The gullibles of Christchurch put in $19m. All gone in fees and salaries to the chosen few. And $2m in debts.
Who was the advisor “in a professional legal capacity”? Amy Adams, John Keys pick for Minister for Communications and Information Technology.
That is interesting.
I looked at Indranet, back when it started. The concept looked sort of sound BUT there was too much hype in the prospectus and too make it work you needed a lot of buy in.
What is your source for Amy Adams involvement? (I could find any on a quick search)
In 2005 these were the parties involved in the company:
Major shareholders: Managing director Louis Arnoux with 21.76 per cent (assuming the $5 million is raised), a trust associated with director Dan Hilgendorf with 11.47 per cent, a company associated with alternate director Peter Mcaulay with 11.47 per cent, a trust associated with director Andrew McGregor with 11.18 per cent and a trust associated with chairman Russell Fitts with 9.17 per cent.
* Key executives: Managing director Louis Arnoux, chief executive John King and commercial development manager Richard Punter.
Bill O’Rees and DV 21 and 21 1
This sounded interesting so I looked up Amy Adams in wikipedia and about her there is little. She is in her forties, she went to Rangitoto College, she got her lawyer’s degree and her house was on a fault line but after the earthquake was judged fit to live in. She is married and has two children so that’s all we know.
I looked up The Press for IndraNet and Amy Adams but she was absent. But stuff had lots on IndraNet Technologies – fascinating and tied up with Hubbards wonderful investments, ie full of wonder. I supply the links below.
This coment from report on Hubbard’s dealings refers to IndraNet.
6/10/2010 Statutory report reveals risk investing in Hubbard funds Companies Office records show HMF as being a shareholder in mobile mass spectrometer company Syft, headphone noise reduction company Phitek and IT Mainland, an associate of the infamous Indranet which now describes itself as a “green energy” company.
IT Mainland and Syft are close to investment wipeouts, while Phitek’s published accounts still show losses.
And while I was looking at reports of Hubbards financial dealings I read this other item from business journalist Chalkie who has a bright and informative style. ‘Accounting rules muddy the waters.’ A warning from the end of the piece –
“The episode sadly reinforces the pitfalls for investors in our sharemarket. These days, accounting standards are so complex that a keen private investor needs the instincts of a predator, the suspicion of a police officer and the analytical skills of Sherlock Holmes.” http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/opinion-analysis/7452876/Accounting-rules-muddy-the-waters
He has just released a press release suggesting that the Labour Party caucus has met and he is satisfied with the behaviour of his MPs.
Two tiny problems:
1. Caucus has not met recently and does not meet until tomorrow.
2. If he is satisfied with the behaviour of his MPs I would hate to see the day where he was dissatisifed with their behaviour.
I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt. But he apparently said
“we’ve had a discussion incaucus (and with) the caucus members and (it’s) behind us now”.
This reads like the transcript of something he said rather than a press release. There might be enough wriggle room to get out of that but the meaning seems pretty clear to me.
hmm. Maybe go to the link and take a squiz at the picture inset to the right of the main story? That’d my punt for one of who the ‘them’ are. And it seems you could even call in and ask him! Wouldn’t expect any kind of straight answer, mind. That’s if there’s any answer at all….
edit. It’s a historical link. Probably the response then?
I suspect Shearer will be dissatisfied with their behaviour on the day they promote policy that challenges the status quo. None of the rest seems to matter, as long as neoliberal dogma isn’t challenged.
I doubt Shearer would deliberately mislead. I suspect something is lost in translation. And the useless Labour press people (who might be complicit in the Garner screw-up) probably twisted it.
I can’t imaging him leaving himself open to criticism by the vast majority of the Causus. But it is getting worse. Someone has to tell Shearer, that when you are in a hole you should stop digging.
I wonder if the whole thing of becomming Leader before one has decided that Parliament is really the great life had overwhelmed him. He is acting like someone who is bewildered or punch-drunk. He needs a Holiday!
sad, mad or bad news from radionz or maybe all three methinks…
Researchers in Japan say radioactive fallout from the Fukushima meltdown have created abnormalities among the nation’s butterfly species.
The researchers collected hundreds of butterflies in the weeks and months after the disaster at the nuclear plant in northern Japan following the earthquake and tsunami of 11 March 2011.
They found abnormalities in more than 10%, including unusually small wings.
The rate of abnormalities then rose to more than a third with the second generation, with some butterflies dying before reaching adulthood.
The scientists have called for further research into other animal species.
Global corporations like Dow Chemical, Adidas, and McDonald’s are paying upwards of $100 million USD to sponsor the 2012 London games and associate themselves with the Olympic brand — but with their brands already well-established, what do corporations get in exchange for these expensive sponsorship deals?
According to Dave Zirin, sportswriter and columnist for The Nation, the payoff comes through “corporate sin-washing.”
Carol, you can hardly blame the corporations, which only to what they are “in business” to do, exploit!
If you want to look in the direction of the IOC, then you will be closer to mark of finding where the sell out really happens, although do not be surpirsed when links between the corporate worls, and the sporting committees are closer than might be desireable.
Both the IOC and corporates influence each other, muzza. The professionalisation of sport, along with corporate sponsorship has occured over time, witht he main impetus coming from corporates., and the Murdoch-style corporate media. Now the IOC has made themselves dependent on corporates in order to keep reproducing the kind of event that the private TV companies will televise.
Now watch the rot set in at the village…. All those flash video presentations of its future will fall flat, there is to much depravation in the surrounding area, plus the UK Government has failed to address any of the structural problems with the economy.
Why with these Olympics (and other flashy events) am I reminded of the Roman Emperors putting on gladiatorial games to sate the masses. Times really have not changed.
Agreed entirely. In Auckland in 20 (or 10?) years time our next generation will praise us for building the inner city loop. Or curse us for continuing to build motorways.
Because when oil starts to run out there will be a stampede towards a transport system that does not rely on petroleum. I hope we have made the electric rail system robust enough to manage.
I hope we have made the electric rail system robust enough to manage.
We won’t have as the RWNJs will be there complaining about doing so every step of the way. Then, when it becomes obvious that cars are no longer viable, they’ll immediately blame the left for preventing the building of the necessary infrastructure.
I know you think the Standard comments are just a bunch of ultra-lefties, who can be ignored. You’re wrong. I haven’t been “radical” since my hair started to disappear, a long time ago. I’m a soggy centre-left liberal. I *heart* Clark and Cullen. Like many Labour voters, I don’t ask for a Socialist Utopia tomorrow … I just want a better country, bit by bit. I thought you did too.
But you are incredibly, staggeringly incompetent. I am no “insider”, so I have no idea why you are so hopeless – but you are. And it’s high time you faced up to it.
Here is one very small example, from today. Multiply it many times over, every day, and you have Labour’s performance, not just this week, but for years now.
Today – MMP review.
Therefore – Politicians respond to MMP review. As of 3 pm, parties such as NZ First, ACT and the Greens had put out a press statement.
Meanwhile, a whole bunch of interested parties (academics, pressure groups etc) had put out their statements. They had analysed the report and commented on it, in detail.
This is not surprising. The MMP review was a scheduled event, in the diary. So anybody with any interest in this important issue was ready for its release.
NONE of these people or parties have the resources available to the Labour caucus/leadership. So why are you always the slowest? Not just today … every day.
Why does nothing ever change? What is going on? Please, explain. Engage with us. Talk to us. Do you have any idea how frustrating it is – day after day after day – to wait for Labour and/or Shearer to say something – and then to hear that something is barely incoherent.
Please don’t say “it’s the media”. We’re not stupid. We can read Scoop, or Red Alert, or twitter or any of the umpteen DIRECT channels to communicate with us. But – day after day – there’s nothing. Or there’s flannel. It’s so disheartening. It really is.
Usually people sign off a rant like this with “I’m not voting for you!”. And right now I feel like I won’t. But here’s the thing … I want to vote Labour. I always have.
Do you want my vote, or have you just given up? Because it really feels like you have. Please prove me wrong.
Well, it seems that within the last hour or so, Labour (Dalziel) has posted a comment on the MMP review (time recorded 15.19). When I looked an hour or two ago, the other 2 articles posted today were at the top of this page:
Well, he’s certainly not on the TV news. Unlike Peters, Dunne and Banks – who were also on the radio, several different stations, earlier today, all talking about the major story – MMP.
It was entirely predictable that it would be the big story, so Shearer … disappeared.
Genuine question: What was the Labour leader’s diary today?
More importantly: What will his diary be during an election campaign?
Maybe Shearer did get shoulder-tapped by National when he got back to NZ, and they said “the Labour party are going to offer you a job. We want you to take it.”
gobsmacked
I’ve noticed that there is often a mixup in the words diary and dairy. Perhaps Shearer is down at the dairy having a thickshake – unfortunately at the wrong place at the wrong time. Thickshakes take a lot of sucking to get through. You would be right to say – the situation really sucks.
The last of the parties to put out a press release, three hours after I wrote one for them on the other thread. In my lunch break.
Which pretty much tells us clear as day that it wasn’t a big issue to them. I guess some very clever person in the leader’s office decided that it didn’t fit the heart-warming heartland narrative of the week, never mind that no one gives a fuck about that.
The other day I suggested there were two sides to every story and there always is… Some people interpreted the comment the wrong way but maybe that was my fault. I should have been clearer what I meant.
The fact is, some of us have been saying much the same sort of thing within our local electorate Labour structures for the past 3 to 4 years, but to little avail. I don’t really know why, but have to assume the hierarchy are still listening to the wrong people.
Anyway it was a succinct post and came from the heart. That is what Labour should be about! Thanks gobsmacked.
Felix Marwick, Newstalk ZB August 13, 2012, 12:45 pm
“Labour’s leader is satisfied with the behaviour of his MPs.
It follows a number of distractions for the party that went public last week including speculation about David Cunliffe’s popularity with his colleagues, and Sua William Sio’s warning that Louisa Wall’s Marriage Amendment Bill would cost Labour the next election.”
“Labour leader David Shearer says he’s happy with the discipline of his caucus.”
“Yes I am, we’ve had a discussion in caucus (and with) the caucus members and (it’s) behind us now.”
Mr Shearer says they’re determined to stay focused on the issues that matter.
it is much easier to be a tory than a committed labour voter.all you have to do to be a tory is have an unquenchable desire to rule over others and the smarts to use a system that is designed to favour anal retentives in their strivings to dominate the poor and weak ( its much harder to dominate the strong and mighty).
thus to be a labour supporter is to have the desire to help your brother with no questions asked.
so who here who claims to be a labour supporter belongs to a branch or has done any work for the party in the last year.
thats the acid test.
it is much easier to be a tory than a committed labour voter.all you have to do to be a tory is have an unquenchable desire to rule over others and the smarts to use a system that is designed to favour anal retentives in their strivings to dominate the poor and weak
Hmmm, an oversimplification and somewhat off-target. Its easy to be a committed National voter because National consistently and always looks after its core voters. Even in the face of significant electoral disapproval over individual policies.
This piece of shite has been posted to Facebook, as an example of the ‘debate’ on The Standard:
”
Dear KB Forum,
I never thought it would happen to me. I was t:roll:ing away as usual, when all of a sudden I received a permanent ban! Oh wow, I felt so proud! I thought I was really sticking it to those lefties, ramming my point home again and again, paying close attention over hours, days, even weeks, and finally they said they couldn’t take it any more! I feel so proud – I immediately came! Here! And the best thing is, it makes me an oppressed mass, and bad boys are cool. I’m just like Mr Fifty Cents. More at yourpimpingNZ.cum.
Yours,
Pete-Diddy. ”
As I am on permanent moderation, the perpetrator won’t know that his laboured attempt at humour is famous, for days!
Ahh, Vicky, the IP address that you’re currently using is in the same domain as one blocked because of another user. I’ll look in to this further and see if the block can be removed.
So do I! Lyn is in pain as she cuts stuff out to it the new smaller space. I on the other hand are estatic because with epubs I we able to offload my entire book collection to someone else (and keep growing my library)
because I can’t reply to the original, I will add my reply here (re your post above which Vicky quoted): GOLD. Thank you for the best laugh I’ve had in ages.
Shane Jones was on Native Affairs, representing Labour in a kind of “Leader’s Debate” on current issues like also the recommendations by the commission on MMP.
Hone Harawira, Winston Peters, Metiria Turei and Flavell (for the Maori Party) were present.
I presume that Shane Jones was the preferred Maori member from Labour to appear there. He did disagree with Hone on the richer paying their share (e.g. more tax), saying that Labour did not see that as a kind of right step, they would rather want to grow the economy.
So do I take it then, that Labour is happy with the top income tax rate of only 33 percent (for those earning over 70 k p.a.)?
Just more proof of where Labour now stands, right?
At least a positive news to night, Valerie Adams is now being warded the gold medal, after the Belorussian who won the competition at the Olympics has retrospectively been disqualified, due to having used performance enhancing steroids or the likes.
The Ministry of Social Development’s and Work and Income’s ‘Principal Health Advisor’ – in charge of managing, mentoring, instructing and supervision Regional Health Advisors, Regional Disability Advisors and also in charge of “training” their “designated doctors”, has a number of “presentations” he likes to show, two of which can be found via these links:
That reads like something produced by a libertarian circle jerk posing as a policy think tank. A few weeks of hunger always does wonders to make people decide to stop being paralysed or have cancer? These people are dangerous psychos.
Thank you for your excellent links. Having read the presentations of Dr Bratt I would have to say he is completely moronic. Why even pretend that the Ministry of Social Development even cares about the plight of beneficiaries. To attempt to rationalise their efforts towards beneficiaries as somehow morally just and therefore justifiable is beyond condemnation.
These people care about beneficiaries like ACT cares about humanity. In other words, they don’t care one iota about the future prospects of the marginalised and dis-enfranchised. They just simply want them off their books.
Of course the hand wringing politically left-leaning middle class bureaucrat may well think that their motives are pure and beyond reproach – I can tell you this, they are simply being delusional with a twist of sanctimony. I regard Dr Bratt in this capacity.
No doubt he will bring out some heart wrenching tale about his mum raising him as a solo parent – after his Dad was killed saving a bus-load of toddlers from certain death. No doubt he will say that he was raised in a state-home with bare cupboards and in a poor neighbourhood – surrounded by brown people. They were the only pākehā family in the street.
And there is absolutely no doubt that this marginalised tale of woe will justify, to the ruling class, all manner of abuses towards beneficiaries – because it comes with the attitude “that if I can do it so can you – let me encourage you by making you starve.” Hardly a moral stance. I say to Dr Bratt revisit that hypocratic oath – you’re sounding more like a hypocrit.
It is also highly probable that Dr Bratt was born to professional people therefore has a refined sense of self importance to which I then would say, “is this the best that can be done by the more refined?
Its moronic and it comes across as an indoctrination into the third reich.
This is a re-post from the Climate Brink by Andrew DesslerAs readers of this Substack will know, I've been increasingly concerned about the destruction of one of America’s greatest competitive advantages: our university research system. Recently, the Trump administration announced that they were going to cut university overhead rates to ...
Indonesia’s low-key rejection of reported Russian interest in military basing in Papua says more than it appears to. While Jakarta’s response was measured, it was deliberate—a calculated expression of Indonesia’s foreign policy doctrine of non-alignment, ...
In the week of Australia’s 3 May election, ASPI released Agenda for Change 2025: preparedness and resilience in an uncertain world, a report developed for the next government and to promote public debate and understanding ...
On 27 January 1973, the conflict in Vietnam was brought to an end with the formal signing in Paris of the Agreement on Ending the War and Restoring the Peace in Vietnam by four parties: ...
Back in 2018, Aotearoa was in the midst of the Operation Burnham inquiry. During this, it emerged that key evidence was subject to a US veto under an obscure and secret treaty. Part of the Five Eyes arrangement, this treaty was referred to by a number of different names in ...
I hate to sound the alarm, but New Zealand’s economy is teetering on the edge, and Finance Minister Nicola Willis is wielding her austerity axe with a reckless abandon that could plunge us into a prolonged recession. The 2025 Budget, with its brutal $1.1 billion reduction in baseline spending, is ...
I hate to sound the alarm, but New Zealand’s economy is teetering on the edge, and Finance Minister Nicola Willis is wielding her austerity axe with a reckless abandon that could plunge us into a prolonged recession. The 2025 Budget, with its brutal $1.1 billion reduction in baseline spending, is ...
Crime Pays for the PoliticiansThis morning, Paul Goldsmith, the Minister who wants Te Reo Maori scrubbed, announced that prisoners who are serving terms of less than 3 years be barred from voting. From left, Police Minister Mark Mitchell, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith & Mental Health Minister Matt DooceyNZ’s Electoral Review ...
Well, I can't see and I can't hearThey've burnt out all the feelingsAnd I never been so crazy, and it's just my second yearFour walls, wash basinFour walls, wash basinFour walls, wash basin, prison bedSongwriter: Don Walker.The coalition parties are mulling the austerity budget they will soon put to the ...
First, hats off to Tory Whanau. Her decision to bow out and run for the Māori ward instead, putting the city’s future above her personal ambition, is commendable. Facing a torrent of personal abuse and a council mired in chaos, she still delivered on water investment, cycleways, and housing reforms. ...
Trump Kills A Sure-ThingIn Canada, the Conservatives fell from a 21 point lead a few months ago to a decisive loss yesterday. The Canadian Liberals are ~ 2 to 3 seats short of a majority, which means PM Mark Carney but will still need to work through opposition parties ...
Australia’s cost-of-living election has a khaki tinge and an uneasy international tone. You know defence is having an impact when a political party promises to raise taxes to buy more military kit, and makes defence ...
The Waitākere Ranges, a stunning natural taonga west of Auckland, are at the heart of a brewing controversy that’s exposing the ugly underbelly of New Zealand’s political discourse. A proposed deed of acknowledgement, grounded in the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act 2008, aims to establish a joint decision-making committee with ...
I spoke last night with Simplicity Chief Economist and Head of Policy about the Government's latest budget policy tightening, the risks for infrastructure investment and a potential dampening of GDP growth.He points out that the Government has cut capital expenditure so far in the current financial year, rather than ...
The Ukrainian air force went to war against invading Russian forces in February 2022 with just 125 combat aircraft concentrated at around a dozen large bases. Given Russia’s overwhelming deep-strike advantage—hundreds of deployed warplanes and ...
Briefly this morning: Nicola Willis rules out charities tax or any tax hike to reduce budget deficit. She’s focused instead on spending cuts. There are 1,000 at-risk kids without a social worker, NZ Herald reports.Housing shortages are a factor in high-risk sex offenders being put out early into uncontrolled community ...
Truly, these are tough times for our nation’s leaders. In future, how on earth are they going to find the sort of money they’ve been happy to throw at landlords, tobacco companies, and wealthier New Zealanders ever since they got elected? On Defence, how are they going to find those ...
A couple of months ago now I wrote a post about the new set of discount rates government agencies are supposed to use in undertaking cost-benefit analysis, whether for new spending projects or for regulatory initiatives. The new, radically altered, framework had come into effect from 1 October last year, ...
Huawei dominates Indonesia’s telecommunication network infrastructure. It won over Indonesia mainly through cost competitiveness and by generating favour through capacity-building programs and strategic relationships with the government, and telecommunication operators. But Huawei’s dominance poses risks. ...
Democracy and the liberal tradition have long been seen as among the most basic tenets of the American way of life. They are also the main reason the West has for the past 80 years ...
Nicola Willis continues to compare the economy to a household needing to tighten its belt to survive. Photo: Getty Images The key long stories short in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Tuesday, April 29 are: Nicola Willis today announced a cut in the Government’s new spending ...
The Herald had another announcement today about a new solar farm being officially opened - this time the 63MW Lauriston solar farm in Canterbury. It is of course briefly "NZ’s biggest solar farm", but it will soon be overtaken by Kōwhai park at Christchurch airport (168MW) and Tauhei (202MW), both ...
I woke this morning to the shock news that Tory Whanau was no longer contesting the Wellington mayoralty, having stepped aside to leave the field clear for Andrew Little. Its like a perverse reversal of Little's 2017 decision to step aside for Jacinda - the stale, pale past rudely shoving ...
In a pre-Budget speech this morning the Minister of Finance announced that this year’s operating allowance – the net amount available for new initiatives – was being reduced from $2.4 billion to $1.3 billion (speech here, RNZ story here). Operating allowance numbers in isolation don’t mean a great deal (what ...
Of the two things in life that are certain, defence and national security concern themselves with death but need to pay more attention to taxes. Australia’s national security, defence and domestic policy obligations all need ...
The Coalition of Chaos is at it again with another half-baked underwhelming scheme that smells suspiciously like a rerun of New Zealand’s infamous leaky homes disaster. Their latest brainwave? Letting tradies self-certify their own work on so-called low-risk residential builds. Sounds like a great way to cut red tape to ...
Perfect by natureIcons of self indulgenceJust what we all needMore lies about a world thatNever was and never will beHave you no shame don't you see meYou know you've got everybody fooledSongwriters: Amy Lee / Ben Moody / David Hodges.“Vote National”, they said. The economic managers par excellence who will ...
The Australian Defence Force isn’t doing enough to adopt cheap drones. It needs to be training with these tools today, at every echelon, which it cannot do if it continues to drag its feet. Cheap drones ...
Hi,Just over a year ago — in March of 2024 — I got an email from Jake. He had a story he wanted to tell, and he wanted to find a way to tell it that could help others. A warning, of sorts. And so over the last year, as ...
Back in the dark days of the pandemic, when the world was locked down and businesses were gasping for air, Labour’s quick thinking and economic management kept New Zealand afloat. Under Jacinda Ardern and Grant Robertson, the Wage Subsidy Scheme saved 1.7 million jobs, pumping billions into businesses to stop ...
When I was fifteen I discovered the joy of a free bar. All you had to do was say Bacardi and Coke, thanks to the guy in the white shirt and bow tie. I watched my cousin, all private school confidence, get the drinks in, and followed his lead. Another, ...
The Financial Times reported last week that China’s coast guard has declared China’s sovereignty over Sandy Cay, posting pictures of personnel holding a Chinese flag on a strip of sand. The landing apparently took place ...
You might not know this, but New Zealand’s at the bottom of the global league table for electric vehicle (EV) chargers, and the National government’s policies are ensuring we stay there, choking the life out of our clean energy transition.According to the International Energy Agency’s 2024 Global EV Outlook, we’ve ...
We need more than two Australians who are well-known in Washington. We do have two who are remarkably well-known, but they alone aren’t enough in a political scene that’s increasingly influenced by personal connections and ...
When National embarked on slash and burn cuts to the public service, Prime Minister Chris Luxon was clear that he expected frontline services to be protected. He lied: The government has scrapped part of a work programme designed to prevent people ending up in emergency housing because the social ...
When the Emissions Trading Scheme was originally introduced, way back in 2008, it included a generous transitional subsidy scheme, which saw "trade exposed" polluters given free carbon credits while they supposedly stopped polluting. That scheme was made more generous and effectively permanent under the Key National government, and while Labour ...
In the week of Australia’s 3 May election, ASPI will release Agenda for Change 2025: preparedness and resilience in an uncertain world, a report promoting public debate and understanding on issues of strategic importance to ...
The news of Virginia Giuffre’s untimely death has been a shock, especially for those still seeking justice for Jeffrey Epstein’s victims. Giuffre, a key figure in exposing Epstein’s depraved network and its ties to powerful figures like Prince Andrew, was reportedly struck by a bus in Australia. She then apparently ...
An official briefing to the Health Minister warns “demand for acute services has outstripped hospital capacity”. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāThe key long stories short in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Monday, April 28 are: There’s a nationwide shortage of 500 hospital beds and 200,000 ...
We should have been thinking about the seabed, not so much the cables. When a Chinese research vessel was spotted near Australia’s southern coast in late March, opposition leader Peter Dutton warned the ship was ...
Now that the formalities of saying goodbye to Pope Francis are over, the process of selecting his successor can begin in earnest. Framing the choice in terms of “liberal v conservative” is somewhat misleading, given that all members of the College of Cardinals uphold the core Catholic doctrines – which ...
A listing of 30 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 20, 2025 thru Sat, April 26, 2025. This week's roundup is again published by category and sorted by number of articles included in each. The formatting is a ...
Let’s rip the shiny plastic wrapping off a festering truth: planned obsolescence is a deliberate scam, and governments worldwide, including New Zealand’s, are complicit in letting tech giants churn out disposable junk. From flimsy smartphones that croak after two years to laptops with glued-in batteries, the tech industry’s business model ...
When I first saw press photos of Mr Whorrall, an America PhD entomology student & researcher who had been living out a dream to finish out his studies in Auckland, my first impression, besides sadness, was how gentle he appeared.Press released the middle photo from Mr Whorrall’s Facebook pageBy all ...
It's definitely not a renters market in New Zealand, as reported by 1 News last night. In fact the housing crisis has metastasised into a full-blown catastrophe in 2025, and the National Party Government’s policies are pouring petrol on the flames. Renters are being crushed under skyrocketing costs, first-time buyers ...
Would I lie to you? (oh yeah)Would I lie to you honey? (oh, no, no no)Now would I say something that wasn't true?I'm asking you sugar, would I lie to you?Writer(s): David Allan Stewart, Annie Lennox.Opinions issue forth from car radios or the daily news…They demand a bluer National, with ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Do the 31,000 signatures of the OISM Petition Project invalidate the scientific consensus on climate change? Climatologists made up only 0.1% of signatories ...
In the 1980s and early 1990s when I wrote about Argentine and South American authoritarianism, I borrowed the phrase “cultura del miedo” (culture of fear) from Juan Corradi, Guillermo O’Donnell, Norberto Lechner and others to characterise the social anomaly that exists in a country ruled by a state terror regime ...
In the week of Australia’s 3 May election, ASPI will release Agenda for Change 2025: preparedness and resilience in an uncertain world, a report promoting public debate and understanding on issues of strategic importance to ...
Chris Bishop has unveiled plans for new roads in Tauranga, Auckland and Northland that will cost up to a combined $10 billion. Photo: Lynn GrievesonLong stories short from Aotearoa political economy around housing, poverty and climate in the week to Saturday, April 26:Chris Bishop ploughed ahead this week with spending ...
Unless you've been living under a rock, you would have noticed that New Zealand’s government, under the guise of economic stewardship, is tightening the screws on its citizens, and using debt as a tool of control. This isn’t just a conspiracy theory whispered in pub corners...it’s backed by hard data ...
The budget runup is far from easy.Budget 2025 day is Thursday 22 May. About a month earlier in a normal year, the macroeconomic forecasts would be completed (the fiscal ones would still be tidying up) and the main policy decisions would have been made (but there would still be a ...
On 25 April 2021, I published an internal all-staff Anzac Day message. I did so as the Secretary of the Department of Home Affairs, which is responsible for Australia’s civil defence, and its resilience in ...
You’ve likely noticed that the disgraced blogger of Whale Oil Beef Hooked infamy, Cameron Slater, is still slithering around the internet, peddling his bile on a shiny new blogsite calling itself The Good Oil. If you thought bankruptcy, defamation rulings, and a near-fatal health scare would teach this idiot a ...
The Atlas Network, a sprawling web of libertarian think tanks funded by fossil fuel barons and corporate elites, has sunk its claws into New Zealand’s political landscape. At the forefront of this insidious influence is David Seymour, the ACT Party leader, whose ties to Atlas run deep.With the National Party’s ...
Nicola Willis, National’s supposed Finance Minister, has delivered another policy failure with the Family Boost scheme, a childcare rebate that was big on promises but has been very small on delivery. Only 56,000 families have signed up, a far cry from the 130,000 Willis personally championed in National’s campaign. This ...
This article was first published on 7 February 2025. In January, I crossed the milestone of 24 years of service in two militaries—the British and Australian armies. It is fair to say that I am ...
He shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old.Age shall not weary him, nor the years condemn.At the going down of the sun and in the morningI will remember him.My mate Keith died yesterday, peacefully in the early hours. My dear friend in Rotorua, whom I’ve been ...
The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-hosts & talking about the week’s news with regular and special guests, including: on news New Zealand abstained from a vote on a global shipping levy on climate emissions and downgraded the importance ...
Hi,In case you missed it, New Zealand icon Lorde has a new single out. It’s called “What Was That”, and has a very low key music video that was filmed around her impromptu performance in New York’s Washington Square Park. When police shut down the initial popup, one of my ...
A strategy of denial is now the cornerstone concept for Australia’s National Defence Strategy. The term’s use as an overarching guide to defence policy, however, has led to some confusion on what it actually means ...
Photo by Beth Macdonald on UnsplashKia oraCome and join us for our weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar with paying subscribers to The Kākā for an hour at 5 pm today.Jump on this link on YouTube Livestream for our chat with myself, and regular guests climate correspondent and on climate ...
The IMF’s twice-yearly World Economic Outlook and Fiscal Monitor publications have come out in the last couple of days. If there is gloom in the GDP numbers (eg this chart for the advanced countries, and we don’t score a lot better on the comparable one for the 2019 to ...
For a while, it looked like the government had unfucked the ETS, at least insofar as unit settings were concerned. They had to be forced into it by a court case, but at least it got done, and when National came to power, it learned the lesson (and then fucked ...
The argument over US officials’ misuse of secure but non-governmental messaging platform Signal falls into two camps. Either it is a gross error that undermines national security, or it is a bit of a blunder ...
Cost of living ~1/3 of Kiwis needed help with food as cost of living pressures continue to increase - turning to friends, family, food banks or Work and Income in the past year, to find food. 40% of Kiwis also said they felt schemes offered little or no benefit, according ...
Hi,Perhaps in 2025 it shouldn’t come as a surprise that the CEO and owner of Voyager Internet — the major sponsor of the New Zealand Media Awards — has taken to sharing a variety of Anti-Muslim and anti-Jewish conspiracy theories to his 1.2 million followers.This included sharing a post from ...
In the sprint to deepen Australia-India defence cooperation, navy links have shot ahead of ties between the two countries’ air forces and armies. That’s largely a good thing: maritime security is at the heart of ...
'Cause you and me, were meant to be,Walking free, in harmony,One fine day, we'll fly away,Don't you know that Rome wasn't built in a day?Songwriters: Paul David Godfrey / Ross Godfrey / Skye Edwards.I was half expecting to see photos this morning of National Party supporters with wads of cotton ...
Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Broadcasting, Tākuta Ferris, and MP for Tāmaki Makaurau, Takutai Tarsh Kemp, are demanding the Government significantly increase its investment in Whakaata Māori in Budget 2025. The call comes following the release of the network’s 2025 Social Value Report at an event today, attended by MP ...
The National Party’s announcement to reinstate a total ban on prisoner voting is a shameful step backwards. Denying the right to vote does not strengthen society — it weakens our democracy and breaches Te Tiriti o Waitangi. “Voting is not a privilege to be taken away — it is a ...
Nicola Willis announced that funding for almost every Government department will be frozen in this year’s budget, costing jobs, making access to public services harder, and fuelling an exodus of nurses, teachers, and other public servants. ...
The Government’s Budget looks set to usher in a new age of austerity. This morning, Minister of Finance Nicola Willis said new spending would be limited to $1.4 billion, cut back from the original intended $2.4 billion, which itself was already $100 million below what Treasury said was needed to ...
Right‑wing ministers are waging a campaign to erase Māori health equity by tearing out its very foundations. ACT’s Todd Stephenson dismisses Treaty‑based nursing standards as “off‑track distractions” and insists nurses only need “skill and a kind heart,” despite clear evidence that cultural competence saves lives. Health Minister Simeon Brown’s funding cuts, hiring ...
The Green Party has renewed its call for the Government to ban the use, supply, and manufacture of engineered stone products, as the CTU launches a petition for the implementation of a full ban. ...
Te Pāti Māori are appalled by Cabinet's decision to agree to 15 recommendations to the Early Childhood Education (ECE) sector following the regulatory review by the Ministry of Regulation. We emphasise the need to prioritise tamariki Māori in Early Childhood Education, conducted by education experts- not economists. “Our mokopuna deserve ...
The Government must support Northland hapū who have resorted to rakes and buckets to try to control a devastating invasive seaweed that threatens the local economy and environment. ...
New Zealand First has today introduced a Member’s Bill that would ensure the biological definition of a woman and man are defined in law. “This is not about being anti-anyone or anti-anything. This is about ensuring we as a country focus on the facts of biology and protect the ...
After stonewalling requests for information on boot camps, the Government has now offered up a blog post right before Easter weekend rather than provide clarity on the pilot. ...
More people could be harmed if Minister for Mental Health Matt Doocey does not guarantee to protect patients and workers as the Police withdraw from supporting mental health call outs. ...
The Green Party recognises the extension of visa allowances for our Pacific whānau as a step in the right direction but continues to call for a Pacific Visa Waiver. ...
The Government yesterday released its annual child poverty statistics, and by its own admission, more tamariki across Aotearoa are now living in material hardship. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra It used to be de rigueur for the prime minister and opposition leader to turn up to the National Press Club in the final week of the election campaign. But now Liberal leaders are not ...
Broadcasting Standards Authority New Zealand’s Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA) has upheld complaints about two 1News reports relating to violence around a football match in Amsterdam between local team Ajax and Israel’s Maccabi Tel Aviv. The authority found an item on “antisemitic violence” surrounding the match, and another on heightened security ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ang Li, ARC DECRA and Senior Research Fellow, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Healthy Housing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne Across Australia, communities are grappling with climate disasters that are striking more frequently and with ...
Opposition MPs say the government's plan to remove voting rights for prisoners is "ridiculous", but it has been welcomed by the Sensible Sentencing Trust. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Victoria Cornell, Research Fellow, Flinders University shutterstockbeeboys/Shutterstock It would be impossible at this stage in the election campaign to be unaware that housing is a critical, potentially vote-changing, issue. But the suite of policies being proposed by the major parties largely ...
Unless your workplace is already utopia – and we haven’t come across one yet – there is a good reason for all union members to come to this hui. Union members and delegates from many different unions and workplaces have told us why they and ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra Daria Nipot/Shutterstock Australia’s headline inflation rate held steady at a four-year low of 2.4% in the March quarter, according to official data, adding to the case for ...
Our targets aren’t ambitious enough. Supported by seven independent experts, we’re arguing that the targets are not aligned with what’s required to limit warming to 1.5°C, and the Commission didn’t carry out its analysis in the way the law ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Micah Boerma, Researcher, School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland Nitinai Thabthong/Shutterstock One of the highlights of the school year is an overnight excursion or school camp. These can happen as early as Year 3. While many ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Edwell, Associate Professor in Ancient History, Macquarie University SvetlanaVV/Shutterstock Something tells me US president Donald Trump would love to be a Roman emperor. The mythology of unrestrained power with sycophants doing his bidding would be seductive. But in fact, ...
It is an unjustifiable limit on the electoral rights of New Zealand citizens that will disproportionately harm Māori, writes law lecturer Carwyn Jones.The government has announced that it intends to resurrect the ill-conceived, Bill of Rights-breaching blanket ban on prisoner voting. This policy was previously implemented by a law ...
ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on April 30, 2025. Locked up for life? Unpacking South Australia’s new child sex crime lawsSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Xanthe Mallett, Criminologist, CQUniversity Australia Melnikov Dmitriy/Shutterstock It’s election time, which means the age old ...
“The promise was for this to be revenue neutral, to reduce congestion and improve efficiency. But if the funds can be spent elsewhere, we’ll call it what it is—another tax.” ...
With just a few days to polls-time, Ben McKay joins Toby Manhire to chat about the Albo v Dutto denouement. This Saturday Aussies will (compulsorily) head to the polls. At the start of the year, Labor under Anthony Albanese was staring down the barrel of defeat and the first one-term ...
Palestinians do not have the luxury to allow Western moral panic to have its say or impact. Not caving in to this panic is one small, but important, step in building a global Palestine network that is urgently needed, writes Dr Ilan PappéANALYSIS:By Ilan Pappé Responses in the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Clare Collins, Laureate Professor in Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Newcastle Loquellano/Pexels Did you start 2025 with a promise to eat better but didn’t quite get there? Or maybe you want to branch out from making the same meal every week ...
“New Zealand is now running the worst primary deficit of any advanced economy. Net core Crown debt has exploded from $59 billion in 2017 to a projected $192 billion this year.” ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robert G. Patman, Professor of International Relations, University of Otago GettyImagesGetty Images Is it possible to reconcile increased international support for Ukraine with Donald Trump’s plan to end the war? At their recent meeting in London, Christopher Luxon and his British ...
John Campbell’s new TVNZ+ docuseries is a gripping and unsettling look at how Destiny Church has amassed money and power – and why its growing aggression should alarm us all.As I sat down for dinner with my fiancée last Friday night, we faced the age-old question of deciding what ...
Welcome to The Spinoff Books Confessional, in which we get to know the reading habits of Aotearoa writers, and guests. This week: Graci Kim, author of new middle grade novel, Dreamslinger.On 7 April Graci Kim announced on her social media channels that she wasn’t going to be touring the ...
Access Community Health support workers will strike from 12-2pm on Thursday, 1 May - International Workers’ Day - the same day as senior doctors and Auckland City Hospital’s perioperative nurses will also walk off the job. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Monica Gagliano, Research Associate Professor in Evolutionary Biology, Southern Cross University Zenit Arti Audiovisive Earth’s cycles of light and dark profoundly affect billions of organisms. Events such as solar eclipses are known to bring about marked shifts in animals, but do ...
By Reza Azam Greenpeace has condemned an announcement by The Metals Company to submit the first application to commercially mine the seabed. “The first application to commercially mine the seabed will be remembered as an act of total disregard for international law and scientific consensus,” said Greenpeace International senior campaigner ...
No good thing ever lasts and this week, the Samoan call was lost to the corporate world forever. Everybody’s heard a cheehoo before. Certainly if you’ve ever been in the vicinity of two or more Samoans, you’ll have heard one whether you wanted to or not. It soundtracks every sports ...
The largest iwi in Aotearoa has yet to settle its Treaty claim. As debate continues, Pene Dalton makes the case for clarity and courage. And settlement. Ngāpuhi is the largest iwi in Aotearoa, with over 180,000 people connected by whakapapa – and our population is growing. That growth brings pride ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Clune, Honorary Associate, Government and International Relations, University of Sydney While many Australians have already voted at pre-poll stations and by post, the politicking continues right up until May 3. So what’s happened across the country over the past five weeks? ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Briony Hill, Deputy Head, Health and Social Care Unit and Senior Research Fellow, Monash University Kate Cashin Photography According to a study from the United States, women experience weight stigma in maternity care at almost every visit. We expect this experience ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Magnus Söderberg, Professor & Director, Centre for Applied Energy Economics and Policy Research, Griffith University Christie Cooper/Shutterstock In an otherwise unremarkable election campaign, the major parties are promising sharply different energy blueprints for Australia. Labor is pitching a high-renewables future powered ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Paula McDonald, Professor of Work and Organisation, Queensland University of Technology Pixel-Shot/Shutterstock US President Donald Trump declared earlier this year he would forge a “colour blind and merit-based society”. His executive order was part of a broader policy directing the US ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Matt Garrow, Editorial Web Developer This federal election, both major parties have offered a “grab bag” of policy fixes for Australia’s stubborn housing affordability crisis. But there are still two big policy elephants in the room, which neither side wants to touch. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Scarlette Nhi Do, Sessional Academic, The University of Melbourne Scene from Apocalypse Now (1979)Prime Video The Vietnam War (1955–1975) was more than just a chapter in the Cold War. For some, it was supposed to achieve Vietnam’s right to self-determination. ...
Analysis - Nothing is certain in politics, and Labor could still lose the election as polls are known to get it wrong in Australia, writes Corin Dann. ...
Dear Jacinda
I trusted you so much, had so much hope you would work for a real change and address the injustices, mean ness and crime that are committed by this government!@
I am disappointed with you and Labour.
In other countries with a Labour history things are dealt with more resolutely. I hope you learn, and I share with yo u this vide:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=HBih0c689cI&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=HBih0c689cI&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbROYuEEpYw&feature=related
NO hope for Labour in NZ, maybe the Greens now, learning quickly.
Basta, not enough.
Buenas noches.
Xtasy, (plus Robert and Paddy), is this blog a bit like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic? Fiddling whilst Rome burns? Discussing arcane ideological theories like bishops questioning how many saints can dance on the head of a needle?
Fekk I am so bored by the politics of our opposition parties, the stupidity of trying to change the status quo for the same staus quo (lite). Time for Jacinda et al to go forth permanently, they have outlived their usefulness, their current paradigm is passe, finito.
Yeah pretty much.
“I trusted you so much,”
–Ill assume you were not being serious X – Jacinda is a product of the system, and has been playing politics for well more than half her adult life already, aty the age of just over 30.
Yeah I agree and have blogged as such.
http://nowoccupy.blogspot.com/2012/08/hello-dolly.html
Not even a spoonful of sugar could help
By Guy McPherson August 10, 2012
Television anchor Edward R. Murrow is credited with this expression: “Just because your voice reaches halfway around the world doesn’t mean you are wiser than when it reached only to the end of the bar.”
Murrow understood the power of television to misinform the masses. This strategy has worked brilliantly on every front, but none more pronounced than the all-important issue of global climate change. Seeking “balance” on the idiot box has meant presenting two sides to a one-sided issue until it’s become too late to address the crisis.
It’s now too late.
Feel the burn
http://transitionvoice.com/2012/08/not-even-a-spoonful-of-sugar-could-help/
Extinction by 2030? Not likely. Unless by “our extinction” he means industrialised society, which I’d give 50/50 odds by 2030. But humans will live for at least a century or two more, easily.
One thing I’m worried about is the inability to properly shut down and contain the dozens of nuclear reactors around the world.
If that could be sorted I think humans could carry on for quite a long time. Not multi-billions of us, but certainly up to a billion or so.
me too.
http://transitionvoice.com/2011/11/three-paths-to-near-term-human-extinction/
Anyone care to critique that and offer mitigation scenarios?
Living in areas far away from the nuclear contaminants should be fairly doable. Higher risk of cancer and such but humans have survived with far higher mortality rates than the present.
yeah – people have moved (illegally) back into the chernobyl exclusion zone.
Another reason tobacco should be fine – it only knocks years off your life if you were going to live past 50 without getting terminal thyroid cancer anyway 🙂
Are they able to grow all their own food there? ‘Cos that’s the scenario that McPherson is on about. We have to live in the radiation soup, and grow all our food there. Not much left in the way of modern medicine either presumably.
I’d like to see someone knowledgeable compare Chernobyl to what McPherson is suggesting in terms of radiation levels, exposures over time, multiple events over time etc.
It was a documentary on chernobyl a few years back – an old couple in particular had moved back in and were whiling away their days with vege gardens and home-distilled potato vodka 🙂
And the issue for most short-lived organisms wasn’t radiation, it was people.
The Japanese studied butterflies near the nuclear contamination sites. In the first generation 10% had smaller wings. The second generation 33% mutations and many of them didn’t get to grow up. Report I caught on news this morning on Radionz.
I put the link at the bottom of open mike prism
http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-13082012/comment-page-1/#comment-506457
marty mars
Thanks. You’re a god on earth.
That’s a nice little Pollyanna approach Lan…unfortunately there are such nasty little things as weather patterns, ocean currents, eroded sediments, airborne dusts etc, not to mention organic things like birds moving about. Takes time, but hey, radiation generally lasts a fair while (multiple millenia), and will get spread everywhere.
Good example is Iraq: from all accounts the Iraq area is so poisoned by particulates from depleted uranium ammunition that the population will probably die off in a generation or two from birth deformities. And the area become uninhabitable for ,000s years. The radiation has already spread via carbon based life forms (Gulf War Veterans) back to the Good Ol’ USA.
“from all accounts the Iraq area is so poisoned by particulates from depleted uranium ammunition that the population will probably die off in a generation or two from birth deformities.”
Reputable links please.
Start with the Guardian which is mainline and tries to stay onside with the powers who be http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jan/22/iraq-nuclear-contaminated-sites
For better links Google iraq radiation poisoning….you will get a whole heap of alternate sites whose reputability varies (remembering of course that the institutions of our power structures from the MSM, Pentagon down don’t want to hear or publicise this). What is striking is the number of Vets sites where US servicemen are on record as having related health issues…its Agent Orange and Vietnam all over again.
Except the mechanism of action with depleted uranium is via heavy metal poisoning via soluble oxides, though I’m unsure of the mechanism of action via inhalation or ingestion of dust*. Why? Because the half-life is so fucking large that the REM’s given off are actually pretty close to background, i.e. you’ll get a higher dosage from a cigarette or tritium paint than from DU. Which makes me very suspicious of the Geiger counter “tests” used by the radiation brigade.
Refined yellowcake is more of an issue, but that’s dosage dependant, as as far as the science available, radiation damage scales lineally to dosage, and probably the main divers are organic solvent and dioxin contamination, which is known to have major developmental biology effects and raise cancer rates very significantly.
As for long term habitability, dioxins will have the longest effect, as they’re notoriously chemically stable in the environment and frankly are best removed from ecosystems via high temperature cremation of dead keystone predators, like humans. Or high temperature baking of contaminated soils and sediments. Uranium however will likely become locked up in the sediment in clays or blown out to sea and removed via locking up of biomass in deep sea sediments. But frankly, the current issues of increasing acidification of the ocean presents a much, much, much bigger issue than highly diluted uranium contamination.
_____________________________________
*short story – lots of loosely bound outer shell electrons = very sticky molecule, and uranium has plenty of spare electrons so will form co-ordination bonds to just about anything. Which in biological organisms will gum up the works, but more so with soluble uranium ions/oxides. Dust inhalation I’m not sure about, probably causes inflammation and scaring though, but unsure if carcinogenic like asbestos.
All sounds very nasty when explained at the molecular level, somewhat reassuring that deep sea deposits tie up uranium…..and agree that its a (very) minor issue compared to ocean acidification and tundra methane release.
Bored, there is no doubt that the DU situation in Iraq is incredibly bad. But there is nothing in that Guardian article that says the population will die off withing a generation or two.
Weka, try this link. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=2374 gives an idea of the scale of the issue which is not reported by the msm, nor published by the scientific “establishment”.
I heard the die off comment on radio (probably Ecoshock) and find it plausible if not (yet) proven. For my misdeeds and bad judgement I once did a pile of stat analysis on demographics and population decline, you can kill off an entire population in a remarkably short generational time with significant causes of mortality and non replacement etc. I was hoping we could apply this principle to possums as opposed to Iraqis…
I do take your point, I must not postulate until proven… nor predict dire outcomes on the precautionary principle even when they are extremely likely or obvious. Foresight… that’s right out. Intuitive conclusions, forget it.
Did I say it would be fun, or easy? No.
I read these links well prior and was somewhat alarmed. So I checked out more links and got thoroughly depressed. If it was worth a bet (i.e I could collect from you as opposed to demand something from your corpse among-st the methane cloud)…I would bet that 2035 may see the end of all we know. I am getting sick of mindless optimism, and nice little plays around soon to be defunct political parties and their machinery. We drive, the ocean dies, get the picture?
Puts the Garner/ABCs/Shearer debacles into perspective. Makes me wonder why we’re bothering to talk about anything else.
Nah mate, trust in the slow catabolic collapse of the modern economy.
Well you’ll be even more alarmed and depressed when you read that, according to the loons at Natural News, Bill Gates plans on eugenically culling 90% of the world’s population through the use of deadly vaccines and birth control
/
That guy is a pretty good rationale for letting humans go extinct. So is Gates though.
The cull is going on all around us, has been for an age…
To all Labour MPs.
The world is under extreme threat. Arctic ice is disappearing faster than scientists thought it would. The possibility of trapped methane being released and triggering a run away feed back process is becoming a nightmare.
Now is the time to put away ideas of triangulating issues to gain a smaller and smaller share of the middle. Now is the time to be brave and talk about the real issues, to educate the population rather than pander to their prejudices. Now is the time to show you are ready to lead.
Now is the time to put away ideas of triangulating issues to gain a smaller and smaller share of the middle. Now is the time to be brave and talk about the real issues, to educate the population rather than pander to their prejudices.
Yes, indeed!
That NZ Herald article looks like a shortened version of this article:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/aug/11/arctic-sea-ice-vanishing
The reason all this climate change is happening is partly due to our striving for full employment with a growing population.
Even the IEA have said something like BAU (full employment) = +6c by 2050 ?? it could have been 2100, whatever??, above about +1.5c – 2c = runaway, take the particulates out of the atmosphere (which industrial collapse may bring about) and we are at runaway now.
The very best we can all hope for from our near future is that New Zealand maintains a degree of law and order, and ‘humanity’ (which is a bullshit word as humans are the least ‘humane’) if we are lucky the fuckwits in Wellington have a plan B, one that gets food to the soon to be rioting masses, I wounder if anyone has done a study of how much food would be needed?
We should aim for 80% unemployment now, after all that is where we are going, so why not get use to it, if we can set up a social structure where everyone is happy doing nothing, except maybe gardening and volunteer stuff? sort of based on Cuba, then maybe we could be last ‘nation’ standing.
We would need some way of repelling refugees, and that would include all the rellys out there = 1.5 – 2 million.
Full employment = getting a payout from Kiwi Saver – an illusion
http://www.alternet.org/story/156344/how_less_work_for_everybody_could_solve_a_lot_of_our_economic_turbulence_and_make_life_more_pleasant
Not just to try and avoid AGW.
A minimum income is a requirement so that those not in full employment can survive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mincome
“Dr. Evelyn Forget [for-ZHAY] has conducted analysis of the research. She found that only new mothers and teenagers worked less. Mothers with newborns stopped working because they wanted to stay at home longer with their babies, and teenagers worked less because they weren’t under as much pressure to support their families, which resulted in more teenagers graduating. In addition, those who continued to work were given more opportunities to choose what type of work they did. In addition, Forget finds that in the period that Mincome was administered, hospital visits dropped 8.5 per cent, with fewer incidences of work-related injuries, and fewer emergency room visits from car accidents and domestic abuse.[1]”.
That’s exactly what we should be aiming for but people won’t be doing nothing. Think art, crafts, culture research and development. The stuff that progresses a society without destroying the environment.
Yes Draco, all that stuff, but lets get the 80% first. Then we can start to reduce CO2, and of coarse NO babies
It’s curious that both Stuff and the Herald have articles this morning focusing on the dire state of employment opportunities in NZ, though each article takes a different angle.
Stuff focuses on a couple of recently graduated individuals, with masters degrees who can’t find employment, indicating that this is the case for many graduates with more than one degree:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/money/7450046/Young-gifted-and-jobless
The Herald article focuses on the occupations that are diminishing in NZ due to taking jobs offshore, or businesses using the internet or IT in order to cut back on the costs of employing actual people in NZ:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10826527
Oh, look, government workers, which the government is trying to cut back on, could be a sustainable employment area….. ????!!
Maybe more of the unemployed should seek to become politicians? Could they do worse than the current lot?
But, seriously, NZ’s whole approach to employment needs a big overhaul, with the aim of keeping Kiwis employed in NZ….. and jobs with a human touch are jobs for the future of a healthy and sustainable society.
It’s not just employment but the entire economy. Doing things with less people is good. Having the wealth then go only to the few while denigrating those that can’t find work (because there isn’t any due to the capitalists accumulating the wealth) is bad.
On the education issue – It’s why if I get back to uni (damn thee depression, again) I’ll be aiming for a Masters of Science and then fucking off overseas if I can. Unless you’re lucky and know the right people, you oft need to have prior experience.
On the job extinction issue – ironically outsourcing will probably cost more in the long term due to distance issues. Particularly with IT, where there’s only so much you can do remotely vis troubleshooting over the phone, where it’s a lot faster to do everything you need to if the computer is actually in front of you. And frankly, the only remote management you should have is that for the server, and it needs to be locked up tight, otherwise you’ve got even more means for arse-hats to gain access. As for outsourcing programming etc, ye gads, it’s straight economic exploitation, and if you’re going to pay peanuts, expect issues a plenty arising with complex code bases and applications.
As for retail – you still need people for the backend with internet stores, as failure to respond to customer issues and returns in a humane fashion* results in a drop off in business or extinction. Also, people will pay premiums for staff help on a variety of products, so I don’t see retail dying off completely anytime soon.
Actually, I’m wondering just what teh fuck Balance Recruitment is basing these claims on, and if they’ll stand up to critical investigation…
_____________________________________________
*Yes, customers can be arsehats in the extreme, but those ones you can have “fun” with, however ignorance is not a reason to treat customers like crap and doing so will cause your business to start flagging
NZ’s whole approach to employment needs a big overhaul
I commented on another thread about differences in employment support where I live. Essentially:
– Unions are voluntary, but with high membership rates
– however belonging to the Chamber of Labour, a policy think tank for employees, is compulsory.
– long-term unemployed are re-trained – quickly.
– government policy is analysed for impacts on employment and adjusted if needs be.
– job subsidisation as required
– collectively agreed (not legislated) minimum wages cover 98% of the workforce
– technical training
– support for small industries and little outsourcing
Point to note – all employment policy is consensus-driven agreements between government, employers and employees. Effect on jobs is a priority consideration in legislation. This sort of policy equates to a 4.5% unemployment rate in the centre of the Eurozone. I’m trying not to harp on – but it’s all so damn do-able. There are a couple of links on the other comment, if you’re interested.
John Ansell is proposing a “Colourblind’ campaign to address “Treatygate”, including an advertising campaign and petition in the hopes of getting a CIR.
Critic has an article including Ansell quotes: http://www.critic.co.nz/news/article/2271/treatygate
Ansell might get a bit of suport on the right fringe but mainstream New Zealand is unlikely to buy into his extreme dream.
He will have a lot of trouble raising money for this, and even more trouble getting enough people to volunteer their time to get signatures. But even proposing this he is going to get a bit of attention, the problem (for him) is it is most is likely to be negative.
Linkwhoring T 🙄
Yes very Boresome.
you’ll be in won’t you pete – fits in with your attitude and position of creating hostility between people. Ansell is so broken I’m sure other broken people will love him and his racism.
The only thing I’ve supported Ansell on in the past is his campaign for a decent New Zealand flag – something highlighted at the olympics where the blag flag with silver fern was far more distinctive than a look-alike with another country’s flag in the corner.
I don’t support this campaign in any way. Ansell is over the top and divisive, and has nutty ideas about the history of our country.
🙄 sigh
Beyond being a linkwhore for him of course 🙄
Why print it Pete?
You will get an automatic reaction of disgust. Of course lefties hate this sort of thing. The treaty is not a con, it is the founding document for our nation. And this one law for all shyte really gets my goat. When people like Ansell advocate that rich people should at the same time lose their excessive privilege it may then be a subject to discuss but not before.
But your post has no style. It is like showing up to a wedding and passing around nude photos of the bride.
There are many posts and comments here designed to get “an automatic reaction of disgust”. Do you want to ban them all?
Maybe you only want good news comments here from now on? You’d better spread the word.
🙄
So Pete is not surprised he generated an automatic reaction of disgust with his behaviour 🙄
You’re wasting your time, Paddy. Pete is a lying racist who’s own site has many posts about bloody maari’s (myself included, weirdly) and he loves this kind of divisive claptrap. You’ll have noticed he claims to not support Ansell, but he has spread this filth as widely as possible. Just a linkwhoring t 🙄
+ 1 yes pete is the lowest racist scum around – that’s why he puts it there – to anger people, agitate them, create division – he gets physically excited by it – really makes his day.
True Marty
Yes I think PG gets off his rocks on exciting distaste here. Bit unpleasant really.
It’s obvious where the unpleasantness is coming from here.
Do you think the Standard community should pretend Ansell’s attempted campaign doesn’t exist?
🙄
con-t 🙄
:roll:, :roll:, 🙄 your boat
gently down shit creek…
“pete is the lowest racist scum around”
I used to think that Pete was just stupid and dull, but I agree with you now marty (and you’ve been saying this for some time). He really is a nasty piece of work, made worse because he is wrapped up in middle of the road crap. At least with people like Ansell and Crimp everyone can see what arseholes they are.
Did I see something about colourblind before scrolling down at a pace? I’m colourblind! Can I be El Presidente?
Ansell is fucking ignorant.
But it is hardly surprising that these issues keep arising. They represent unresolved issues around race in aotearoa and the inappropriate form of the treaty, as I keep suggesting from time to time.
Until these issues are resolved these things will keep coming up. Long time yet methinks.
I don’t want to get into a big thing with you vto but consider your comment – “they represent unresolved issues around race in Aotearoa” and who is raising this – the supporters. They have issues and they are, as you say, “fucken ignorant”. I have been trying for (it seems like) years to get you to see this point.
” They represent unresolved issues around race in aotearoa and the inappropriate form of the treaty”
No they don’t. They represent the very small minority of people in NZ who think that Maori shouldn’t exist. That is what Ansell is talking about – he’s a white supremacist who wants Maori to become white (but poor and white no doubt) or just disappear altogether. ‘Colourblindness’ is code for making everyone white.
Why you would want to align yourself with the likes of him and Crimp is beyond me.
Go back to Kiwiblog.
The difference between the Neo-Liberals and the Left is their perceptions of the seriousness of our economic problems.
If this is just a recession like all others, the Neo-Liberals can argue for tinkering while the economy fixes itself.
If this is much worse, a deflationary depression, the state MUST intervene by employing people rather than laying them off. It must take control of the banking and credit system. It must structurally change the system as was done by Micky Savage and FDR.
The 1930’s Great Depression led to dramatic state changes in every country. In countries where the state did not intervene to re-distribute opportunities, violent revolutions led to dictatorships. That will soon be our choice: make peaceful changes which will piss off the rich and powerful OR descend into anarchy.
Well, after 5 years its clearly not a recession like all others. It also is not a classic deflationary depression as the cost of living has been going up not down – however income deflation is certainly occurring.
One difference to the 1930’s – we no longer have mass organisations representing workers and the unemployed who can bring extreme pressure to bear on political leaders.
This is a famous story:
Five years on … from the UK Guardian, 9 Aug 2012:
“Five years on from what is considered the start of the credit crunch – dubbed “the day the world changed” by the former boss of Northern Rock … On 9 August 2007, the final wake-up call to the world’s banking system occurred after many early warnings over the toxic nature of high-risk mortgage debt. “Sub-prime” was about to enter the vocabulary. … Since the crunch, house prices have fallen, consumer confidence has plummeted and prices and unemployment have risen. … the economy continues to falter …”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/aug/09/financial-crisis-anniversary-trust-in-banks
I’m not sure that it’s as simple as suggesting that the “Left” don’t espouse Neo-Liberal values (ie. there’s a difference) unless of course there is a belief that there is not a true Left leaning party currently in NZ?
Whilst not with the ideological fervour of NACT, both Labour and the Greens still advocate a perpetuation of the existing economic direction that characterises what has been popularised as “Neo-Liberal”. Granted there are some differences around the fringes but there is nothing that I have seen in their economic policies that I would consider revolutionary nor a step away from neo-liberalism.
Undoubtedly its an oversimplification but I view modern Labour and National as two sides of the same coin. Perhaps this is due to the focus on the centrist vote and the continual move of what society would consider “centre” in a rightward direction?
AmaKiwi
While the right were putting up state rents and decreasing everything else decades ago, and there was an effort to protest against loss of jobs there was very little response from the NZ public. Affordable housing is essential but there was little reaction against market rents by the RWNJs back then. Jobs, oh well. If you’ve got what you want it’s all SEP (someone elses problem).
The retired need to push the government to keep the business market going so there is employment available and tax to pay old age pensions which are like PAYE but more truly PATE (the t being they, the others) despite the lovely fantasy that paying 8% of 1950’s wages set up a pension fund now worth billions. Fantasy but that idea still floats.
The young need to claim their birthright – a job which will enable them to earn and live with comfort and be regarded as an integral part of a clever flourishing nation. Everyone has a skill and needs to be doing something. That old saying that idle hands mean trouble wasn’t wrong.
The rest of NZ should be looking at the health of our economy, at the waste of lives and potential if the economy isn’t run properly to keep it ticking during the worst times. Whether anyone can be bothered till confronted with disaster I don’t know. I do a little myself and should do more, and some never do anything. Short sighted to let this slide continue though.
There was an interview about recidivist drinking drivers this morning on Radionz. A statistic that $1 million is being allocated this year for the 30,000 people convicted of this, and the 10,000 approx recidivists. Just how much money does government rake in from alcohol tax??
And the judges do not generally include treatment and education about alcohol in their decisions when convicting, one because our justice system concentrates on the punitive and secondly, because there aren’t enough treatment facilities anyway. A really vicious circle. The saying that if you don’t change anything then you’ll always get the same result rules.
No wonder we are a small country that couldn’t. Because we don’t (think, make a plan, act to pilot it, monitor efficacy and then embody in law what works best and fairly). So we don’t get off our arses and do something, just use the opportunity of failure somewhere to criticise and fault the perpetrator (if it isn’t one of our social class or schoolmates from the ‘right’ background.)
Then we don’t have to work for a better system WE JUST BLAME THE INDIVIDUAL and do bloody nothing of any rational worth.
Recidivist drink drivers are a major danger on the roads according to statistics.
It’s easy to see the problem. It’s not as easy to stop regular drunks from driving.
And it’s not a young people problem, I think their stats have improved.
I guess they were young pissheads at one stage.
Now is this not just typical of the short sightedness of this bunch of no hopers in power ?
The best games in god knows how long and the competition is just finishing. And there’s that Meddling seagull Mcully doing this..
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=10826539
Nice job and now we will freeze the funding. Good luck in Rio. How pathetic is this ?
That man deserves a medal for being the Natz party pooper 🙂
Murray McCully………Barry Humphries’ inspiration for the ghastly Sir Les Patterson !
Local Syrians turning against foreign funded and foreign led rebels
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsEkzai2Yuw&feature=g-user-u
disclaimer – Russia has been pushing back on Western/UN efforts to intervene further in Syria.
Hell by scooter, a video tour of Homs
Thanks man. War is bad, really bad. Waiting for Jenny to give it the thumbs up though.
😀
So – I am in moderation for 😀 ? What the frak, seriously?
Having read the explanation that it’s because I am on dial up, I started using my son’s vodem, and am now on broadband.
So, what the frak. seriously?
Ah. A definition problem.
You’ll find that there is a auto-moderation discrimination against anything that gets a new IP number virtually everytime that they connect. That includes most ways of accessing the 3G networks that give a different IP each connection. I refer to all of those as dial up.
ADSL and most continuous broad band wireless will have only a single IP number for weeks at a time if you aren’t powering them down. Consequently there is less chance that it’s IP or IP range has recently been used by a spammer.
If you think of it from a spammers viewpoint, they prefer to have a different IP all the time – it makes blocking them harder. But it also means that they coat all dial up IP ranges with anti spam auto moderation.
The only time I get moderation on sites that allow comments without logins like ours is when I am using my cell phone as a wireless access point. My own mail server regularly requires a higher verification from me before it will accept my mail fom my phone…
But I see that r0b located a local moderation match – hopefully for the vodem.
Two things – I am always logged in (I don’t post if I am not) and also, basically, what you say, is that your moderation system discriminates against people who can’t afford “ADSL and most continuous broad band wireless”!
My choices are dial up ($9.95 a month) or the Vodafone vodem (paid for by someone else).
This really tells me a lot about the SES of Standardistas! I assume those on UB/SB nevertheless have family/spouses who help support them, or are actually on National Super. ADSL and most continuous broad band wirelessis at least $80.00 a month, which is more than my usual power bill, so is right out of the question.
Vicky, I’ve no idea how much your paying for your phone line and so on. But Orcon has broadband that includes your phone and free national calls for $75 per month on a 12 month contract with 2 months free service to new customers.
So with the two free months, it equates to something just below $65 per month for phone + broadband? I don’t know – maybe still beyond you financially.
( 🙄 Can’t believe I essentially advertised. Must never happen again! )
And $5 per month less if you use your own phone with it which is to be recommended – I didn’t like their phone at all.
You probably need a cell though, because (and I don’t know if there is some reason peculiar to me) the “naked” phone goes down about once every couple of months. If the internet is down at the same time you need to be able to contact faults.
That sounds good, but I would not want to commit to that until/unless I have permanent work. As it is, I pay around $45 a month for my phone and $9.95 for dial up, (I have my own phone) and I do have a mobile… )
The reason I wouldn’t want to commit to something like that, is that presently, I can juggle if necessary – but with a firm contract, I couldn’t juggle…. F’r instance, at present, if I am better off than usual, that is, I’ve just had work, I prepay 3 months dial up, but if I haven’t had work, I can find $9.95 down the back of the couch, essentially! Thanks for letting me know, anyway…
Those prices aren’t unusual. Broadband generally starts at around $25 a month if you get your phone line from the same company.
No idea where you got your $80 figure.
I don’t. The automatic systems do. However they prevent massive numbers of spam here.
You are confusing an explanation with a choice… Tell you what. I could probably divert all of the spam to you to sort through manually? At present I think we’re dumping between 10 and 20k comments a month, all except less than 1% happens automatically using our systems. It is fascinating stuff to read for the first day..
/sarc
It isn’t about you, so please stop doing the victim silliness. It is about protecting the site. You and everyone else who gets caught in moderation just get caught in the crossfire. It isn’t going to change because the alternates are a damn sight worse.
I am tired of explaining this to you via the site and via email…
Eseentially, whatever!
If you accuse me of silliness, well I might as well be silly, right? If you think what I was doing was claiming victimhood, then there’s nothing I can do. Think as you choose. You will note, I hope (but also doubt) that I never said I believed it was ‘all about me’.
Like this CV.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/08/02/breaking_the_arab_news?page=full
A large segment of Al Jazeera’s and Al Arabiya’s audiences, appalled by the Syrian regime’s brutality, no doubt genuinely believes that this is strictly a battle of good versus evil. For the Saudi and Qatari governments, however, Syria’s fate directly affects their political future — they want to see the fall of the regime for either personal or strategic reasons.
Flaubert
It’s a massive fucking shame.
Al Jazeera had all the beginnings of becoming a decent, mostly independent news source in the Middle East that you could rely on somewhat to provide the raw story on the ground and has done a string of brilliant new-docus on social issues around the world and in the ME. Yet we see Qatar thinks they can push a particular editorial line and get away with it and influence public opinion, despite the fact that a lot of opposition organisation in the region occurs via grass-roots social networks, which due to their very nature are somewhat difficult to manipulate into pulling the party line. And tend to spread their views around.
As for why they don’t want to mention the issues with foreign Jihadi’s, it comes down to the simple fact these foreign fighters get their money for weapons etc from Gulf State “charitable” organisations. Despite being oft complete fucking monsters who care not for civilian causalities and ironically what to be rid of the Saudi and Gulf state governments.
Senior Afghan commander killed by rogue Afghan police, one day after six US troopers killed by Afghan ‘allies’
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/12/afghan-commander-killed-by-policemen
This, after being in Afghanistan for a decade, it truly is the graveyard of empires. Maybe in another ten years it will be better?
CV
You’re right. Everything will be better in ten years. That’s well known.
Time to leave, just get the hell out, there’s nothing there for NZ, hell we barely even trade with them. Now I know we originally went in to help with the rebuild, then Key and Co sent in the SAS so then all NZ soldiers became targets of revenge. And now we lose 2 more young men, sent to a war for what? an ideal? nope a lie, a great big fat American lie. and now the man who sends them off to die in the name of this lie doesn’t even attend their funerals
And the Yanks are losing men at a great rate it’s the same as in Iraq one huge army up against a lot of little factions who won?? Have you ever seen footage of a Lion trying to defend a Kill?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p1cVZprJMw
The Americans are the Lions.
Well it was nice while it lasted. I see we’re now back in full Pete George thread hog mode. 9 instances of ‘pete’ in 33 posts = 27%. Still, it’s only just morning tea time.
From the Curiosity landing site a panorama of Gale Crater.
beautiful and amazing – thanks joe
#SarcasticRover
@LosAlamosNatLab @guardianscience IF people don’t like MY PICTURES, They can come take SOME OF THEIR OWN!! LOL BUT THEY’D DIE… lucky.
They should send Curiosity back to Earth, arriving in 2035 or there abouts to record what a methane planet looks like. When intelligent life re-emerges from the primordial ooze in a few million years they can review the strange ape animals demise, as recorded by Curiosity.
MMP review proposals released, see post on that topic.
have to laugh at petey’s support of ansell over replacing the new zealand flag.
a clear case of external referencing.
its not what the damn flag looks like, it is what it stands for that counts.
You lot were mentioned on Radio NZ National this morning. You must be pleased. Of course your views were largely dissmissed as having no real importance. At least you were mentioned though.
You lot includes you to ghost right(whing)er
oooo – that must make your comment our first fan mail. 🙄
ooooops.the bad smell has arrived.
Hey, TS got a mention on RNZ, by Mathew Hooten 🙄 (a la generic truck driver voter isn’t reading thestandard.org).
The ‘left’ commentator, Josie Pagani just defended Shearer’s comments about the SB guy painting his roof, on the basis that Labour can’t stand up for valid beneficiaries unless it also talks about responsibilities 🙄 :roll:, thus completely missing the point and affirming bene and disability bashing as fair sport on the left.
A tad late there weka and also you have seemingly missed the entire point that was being made about The Standard by both Pagani and Hooten. But no worries I’ll paraphrase it for you . Most of you lot are too extreme and keeping you lot happy doesn’t win elections. The people who do make a difference in elections don’t tend to read The Standard.
So another own goal goose so why do you bother bothering us.
Stop reading the standard and make a difference goose and don,t be a hypocrite.
I’ve never doubted that when it comes to elections I’m not really in the mix for determining the outcome. I am pretty much a given in the right column. It is the undecideds in the middle that really count. People who flip flop from left to right and back again. Pagani pointed out this mythical hard left non-voter that some here, (and on other left wing blog sites), hope to inspire doesn’t really exist. Most of the non-voters are centrists.
All that proves is both your and Pagani’s disconnect from reality.
If you have evidence to the contrary it would be interesting to see. I suspect you don’t though.
what – we don’t have any evidence to contradict your and Pagani’s evidence-less assertion, so we’re wrong?
I suspect that some people would assert the existence of the mythical right-wing-voter who isn’t a goatfucker. Seems wishful thinking to me.
Don’t be too hard on him; remember that poor little Gossie struggles with the idea that a word such as “right” can have more than one meaning.
Oh, I’m not saying Gos is a goatfucker. Just that I haven’t seen any evidence that there is a tory voter who is not a goatfucker.
I have the evidence you seek…meet me when the moon is full and bring the Jade Monkey.
hope you washed it since last time.
Probably true. Centrists that are disgusted by the hard right turn made by Labour since 1984.
Grosman
Most of the Non Voters (ENVs) are uninspired by centrists. That is why they are not voting.
Yes, most are not doctrinaire left-wing chatting about the dialectic over a Tui. They are Kiwi’s who feel disenfranchised by the current centrist politics. Their number is substantially larger that the swingers who went for John Keys’s BS. They feel rooted and dis-owned by National and Labour: they would prefer to vote for Winston or an anarchist than come out to vote for a centrist.
The message for swinging centrist middle-classes is very different from the message for the ENVs. Their needs are so different.
Real Labour value should and can connect with these potential voters, without alienating the far smaller group of swingers.
Gosman, I’m fairly sure that I was the first person to post on the RNZ reference to TS and say something of actual substance.
I got the point. But it wasn’t what you said. Both Hooten and Pagani were dismissing the left blogosphere because what it was saying didn’t support their views. Obviously lots of things influence voters, but to say that the political discourse (of which TS is part) in this country is irrelevant is pretty stupid. It would be like saying that RNZ’s political commentator spot is irrelevant.
Besides, I was specifically commenting on Pagani’s defense of bene/disability bashing.
Do you disagree that both commentators on that show dissmissed The Standard as having no real sway over the key voters for determining the outcome of elections in NZ?
I’m saying it was a strawman argument on their part.
Personally I think in tight elections (like the last one), the polls and media have the most influence over which way elections go, which is a fucking anti-democratic travesty.
I think this is a big issue, and a few tweaks to how we do MMP won’t change this. It’s how we (MPS, media and voters) use MMP that matters.
Once the MMP review is complete we should be looking at how the eventual system can best 9and most democratically) be utilised.
Nah, CV’s idea about an independent media is better. Thinking the MSM will change is a fool’s game.
Thinking we can somehow get an ‘independent’ media is as much a fool’s game. We have many types of media with many degrees of independence.
Most mainstream media is commercial so can be influenced by consumers, if they choose. And social media is has an increrasing influence on people in general and on MSM.
We can hope that one day we might get a government that might change the media mix a bit. Or we can look at how to work with the media we have.
” Or we can look at how to work with the media we have.”
Yeah, you’re a real expert at that.
And so is everyone else here, aren’t they.
I don’t think they’re frustrated by their relevance.
PG-167 (or was it 162?) 🙄
Pete drove UF’s vote down to 183. His own showing was even worse, 176. Mind you the 7 vote difference can be partially explained by him not voting for himself anyway! I’m looking forward to him reducing National’s vote in a similar way next election, if he ever gets his fantasy fulfilled by that nice John Key 🙄 .
No it can’t. The commercial MSM is run by the rich to benefit the rich. Being influenced by the consumer won’t benefit the rich. That is also the reason why we have representative democracy.
Independent media FTW. Fuck the big companies 🙂
Electoral 🙄
Elect 🙄
Hooters loves the Standard, mainly because he gets taken seriously here. And at least he was upfront yesterday on the telly about the end of United Future and ACT and the need for Key to dickylick Winston for the next two years. Top bloke!
I’d disagree that the people who decide elections don’t visit the Standard. Where else are the political media going to get their stories from?
+1 People would be surprised at how influential a blog can be, not only on the public but on the media and politicians as well…. Mainly because most of them cannot think for themselves.
Where else are the political media going to get their stories from?
They certainly seem to be somewhat interested in the site.
Gosman: Do you disagree that both commentators on that show dissmissed The Standard as having no real sway over the key voters for determining the outcome of elections in NZ?
We have something in the order of 30 to 40 thousand people reading the site every month. Of course we don’t have a real sway over voters because there are 3 million voters. Nor do any of the political blogs in NZ or anywhere else that I’m aware of. The readerships are simply too small. For that matter you could as easily argue that editorials in newspapers and opinion pieces in newspapers have an small influence as well. The readers of those are pretty small in terms of voters as well. Same for radio and almost every current affairs programme.
About the only ones that have a widespread audience are the TV news programmes. Of course those are so mindlessly soundbitten that they really offer little of substance.
But all of these provide material for voters to talk to each other. That is usually the only thing that significantly influences voters.
Rather pointless assertion. As TRP said, any influence this site has on voters is exerted through journalists and activists rather than direct to voters. Most voters haven’t even been on a blog
One night I happened to be watching TVNZ7 news. It was interesting because they had an interview on it.
Remember when TV1 and TV3 used to have 5 minute interviews during their news hours?
I think I remember those. With the questions and such?
Take your concerns up with Matthew Hooten and Josie Pagani then. I think their point is this site tends to attract the hard core left activists rather than the moderate center of the road voter who might be tempted to vote National as well as Labour. Certainly I haven’t seen anybody making a comment here that fits that description. Not to state that they don’t browse the site from time to time.
I’ve voted National and Labour and could be in a situation to consider either again in the future. I’m variously labeled (here) as anywhere from centre to hard right. That’s just relative to the labeller, I agree that most active commenters here appear to be more hard core left activists.
‘ … variously labelled a t 🙄 … ‘
A good example of why people like Pagani and Hooten regard this site as not being very influential on the swing voter.
It doesn’t need to be.
It occurs to me that it would probably never occur to Gosman that a political and/or idealogical blog/discussion board/opinion-site/whatever can exist simply for the purpose of providing and facilitating a place where that discussion happens. Most right-leaning individuals of my acquaintance seem particularly ‘results-oriented’ and would probably conclude that “if their is no voter gain or profit then what is the point, why would you get involved”
It must of taken alot of brains to work that out pete.
Its better than being a hard core w$$$e like you and your hard core neo liboral paid for by the giant corporations that rip the lungs out of economies .
Vampire capitalism.
Led by Mitt the Twit at the moment.
The werewolf of London.He will rip the lungs out of the us economy.
Bain capital A predatory corporate that asset stripped good American businesses for quick dollars.
I’m not against business, unbridled capitalism it ruins good business by creating global monopolies!
that’s not what Adam Smith said either,he was anti monopoly as well, healthy competition is a good thing
Just about all the countries we trade with Are ruining our economy with some sort of tariff, money printing (devaluing),Subsidies, Huge military spending ,Corruption!
So we are the only mugs on the planet by playing to all the rules when no one else is .
Amusingly, the take-away from this morning’s chat is that the political media and the Labour and National PR people who presumably do have some sort of influence do pay close attention to this blog and others.
It takes a special kind of dullness of the mind to be able to have that conversation on National Radio and not pick up on the inherent irony of the situation, but I suppose they only need to be as smart as each other.
Ah, yes. I was thinking something similar, felix @2.45pm
And how impressed do you think they’ll be with the standard of discourse here? It more often resembles Mallard’s political kindergarten than a flagship think tank of the left.
As lprent intimates, this is only a very small bubble in the whole scheme of things, and one that’s often unattractive to the outside.
Pete
You may not have noticed but the overwhelming majority of flame wars that occur here have one common feature, you.
Others here are obviously convinced that you are here only to make trouble and disrupt with your passive aggressive and snidely rascist comments. For example have a look at the way you posted Ansell’s comments this morning.
Rather than continuing to blame the very solid leftys that comment here perhaps your search for someone to blame should be more inwardly focussed.
micky, you may not have noticed but the overwhelming majority of flame wars are one sided attempts, and often with only one aim, to attack me regardless of what I post. If you look just below here I posted something and the usual trolls attacked, and the exact same topic was deliberately re-raised and discussed.
If you want to be an exclusive club of hard lefties that harrasses off anyone you take a dislike to then you need to be more upfront.
Maybe the blog has evolved since that ideal. If you want to be narrow minded and nasty don’t try and pretend to yourselves you ‘re a flagship for the broad left.
Much of the active comment here would not appeal to most potential Labour or Green voters. Nor would the behaviour.
Negative attack politics seems to be the core activity, in posts and comments. I just happen to attract some of it, but it’s far more pervasive than that. If that’s how you want to be then fair enough, but it doesn’t seem to satisfy many of you, this place oozes discontent and bitterness.
You’ll attract better if you act better. If that’s what you want.
[lprent: Re-read what you quoted. Even after all of this time and for that matter bans for it, you appear to be trying to spin what this site is about.
We’re not trying to talk to “potential Labour or Green voters”. We are trying to spread the perspective of “labour movement activists”. You appear to be such a political newbie that you have not realized that these are two radically different things.
We simply don’t care except in general terms about getting the voters voting because we’re not a political party and that isn’t our task. Sure some of us do that in other roles. But this site is here to allow people on the left to play with ideas and argue. We make it public so that people can see what we’re interested in and are arguing about. We rather enjoy having people of other political bents coming in and arguing provided that they can argue and follow our site rules.
What you seem to fail to understand is that as well as putting up ideas for criticism, there are objectives of the site includes pointing out the flaws of political policies, flawed economics, political idiots, brown-nosing journos, and outright thickheads like yourself. This is because those are also part of the political process, which is something that you seem to prefer that others do not do. Most people around here have long since concluded that is because you hate mirrors….
I’d ask if you get the point, but it is quite apparent that you never do think on what others say. For some reason you appear to think that examining and expressing your own unthinking and often bigoted ideas about the left is a preferable technique to listening to others or actually thinking.
Permanent ban for yet again trying to tell us what we should be doing with the site. I’m tired of it and I really don’t think you’re capable of either learning or holding your end up in any kind of discussion. ]
Have you ever thought of applying any of your very helpful advice to your own behaviour? Cos seriously mate, your comments lately are reading like the notes from a therapy session.
Pete
You still don’t get it do you,
Have you ever countenanced the slightest possibility that your commenting habits may in the slightest way contributes to the opprobrium that you experience?
Ever had that nagging doubt?
Ever thought the passive aggressive racist dog whistling might actually upset many?
Ever thought that the snide holier than thou retorts on how terrible we all are you then come out with might actually harden attitudes?
Of course he has, and that’s why he does it.
Right back atcha, trool.
“Permanent ban for yet again trying to tell us what we should be doing with the site. “
A pleasant end to a pleasant day.
🙂
He never did answer those questions …
I’m sure he’ll be frantically answering them all over at the bog as fast as his cold dead fingers can type. 🙂
Dear KB Forum,
I never thought it would happen to me. I was t:roll:ing away as usual, when all of a sudden I received a permanent ban! Oh wow, I felt so proud! I thought I was really sticking it to those lefties, ramming my point home again and again, paying close attention over hours, days, even weeks, and finally they said they couldn’t take it any more! I feel so proud – I immediately came! Here! And the best thing is, it makes me an oppressed mass, and bad boys are cool. I’m just like Mr Fifty Cents. More at yourpimpingNZ.cum.
Yours,
Pete-Diddy.
And a smile just crept across my face.
Applause, the recipient has been begging for it right from the point of arriving back from the previous ‘kick’…
Sadly true!
Going to permaban me, then? Go ahead, make my point!
As it seems I am on permanent moderation, what difference will it actually make?
Vicky the thing is that Petey does not “happen to attract some of it”, he sets out with the intent of, if at all possible, getting negative comments. It is a real wankfest for him. The rest of us hate it, we would prefer to debate the issues. He then does this passive aggressive stuff and suggests he is the victim. He is not. He is a silly person who does not realise that if he wants a debate he will get one but if he wants to tr0ll he will get dumped on.
watching over the years i’ve noticed it’s never a good idea to ask for a ban…
Thank goodness for that.
*whoosh*
And again, I agree with PG! Scary!
Please don’t try and stand in for him. You’re fine as you are.
“And again, I agree with PG! Scary!”
Yeah. I mean he’s a reactionary self-obsessed bigot who displays an embarrassing lack of comprehensive ability while trying to present himself as the lone voice of sensibility in a world gone mad, whereas you’re not like that at all.
So weird.
btoh hvae vrey tniy humour-modes
Sorry, forgot my sarc tags
Ummm I am only intimate with Lyn and my family. There are very few other people who have met me, even fewer who know that they have, and not many people who aren’t programmers who know much about me (code is an extremely effective mechanism at reading core personality).
Most of the authors have met me only a few times at best and bugger all commentators ever have. Virtually everything that most people here know about me is visible on the web, and most of any perceived favoritism is purely accidental (apart from authors) as I haven’t found anything to be savage to them about.
But I suspect it was just a typo?
@Felix (19.1.3.3)
I follow sites like Conservapedia and The Standard for amusement…you never know what the kooky ideologues are going to do next!
It doesn’t mean following them means I regard them as having any influence though.
And that’s fine, but I’m assuming you’re not a mainstream journalist or a PR person working for a political party or a professional lobbyist.
All I was saying is that a lot of people who do play a role in shaping opinions in the wider community do keep a close eye on the arguments here.
Possibly, but I bet some of them also keep a close eye on midget porn and George W. Bush Supporter Blogs but that doesn’t mean they take them seriously.
It would be, at this stage with all evidence pointing to the contrary, quite a large hubris on the part of people at The Standard to consider themselves anything other than a weird microcosm of what the (mostly) far left get up to when the have the run of the coop.
But whatever, be what you want, little man. Never give up!
Frankly they’d be crazy not to keep an eye on midget porn. And yeah I understand that the fact that things are read doesn’t necessarily equate to them being taken seriously, and it would take a very naive person to believe otherwise.
But it would be just as naive to say that professional lobbyists, PR people working for political parties, and high-profile mainstream journalists are regularly reading The Standard but only for amusement.
Wouldn’t you say?
ps I’m assuming “midget porn and George W. Bush Supporter Blogs” refers to two things, not one.
“ps I’m assuming “midget porn and George W. Bush Supporter Blogs” refers to two things, not one.”
Gimmie your email address and I’ll send you some links. It’s pretty filthy.
But maybe not only for amusement but it is rare The Standard ever cited with same amount as gravitas as Kiwiblog for example.
Take that to mean what you will
Well, I hope they have a high tolerance for sweary ad hominens and juvenile abuse…
Personally, I’d lift my game and stop being such a self-loving boy, were I some of the most-loved posters here, and wanted to be taken seriously by the genuinely uncommitted.
Well, it was more or less the same anecdote that she put up on her facebook page. Her’s didn’t have a roof in it, but the thrust was identical – decent hard working kiwis resenting anyone defending bludgers.
That was meant in response to Weka @ 19
You got a link for that? Just having a look at her FB page and can’t find it.
She’s got from pretty unintelligent stabs at the Greens though. I don’t know much about her, but she doesn’t come across as too bright. ‘We can dismiss everything Gordon Campbell says because he’s a Green’ kind of thing.
Sorry I got the facebook bit wrong; it was in the Herald in January. Her response to Chris Trotter was on her facebook page. \
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=10778301
Here’s Trotter’s response as well
http://bowalleyroad.blogspot.co.nz/2012/01/whatever-it-takes.html
Here is the facebook comment
https://www.facebook.com/Josie4Labour/posts/405360552840426
And a further response from Trotter.
Pagani wants to emulate the “success” of the UK Labour Party, begun with Kinnock (she claims) and culminating in Blair and his destruction of grass-roots democracy in the UK Labour Party? Really?
And times have changed since Kinnock’s days at the early period in the rise of neoliberalism.
Not a deep-thinker, then is Ms Pagani.
Thanks for the links, Olwyn.
As someone somewhere in TS comments pointed out, the line Shearer used was then same one Josie Pagani had used in her blog some tme back. So, of course she would defend it seeing as how Shearer was spoon fed the line by her dipshit sidekick on the grounds it was a good strategic position to take.
edit Sorry Olwyn. Didn’t see you’d re-highlighted the fact
Oh ok, her FB post was a while ago. Who is her dipshit sidekick?
Another Pagani.
“Who is her dipshit sidekick?”
As far as I’m aware….policy/strategy advisor to the Labour party. I know, I know…just breath deeply, count to ten and try not to scream too loudly.
Actually, there is no obvious link between Pagani’s comment and Shearer’s. Pagani commented about the difficulty of selling the proposal to extend Working For Families to beneficiaries during the election campaign. Nothing to do with being on a benefit/bludging at all.
Looks like slightly cloaked bene-bashing to me. Besides Olwyn was pointing to FB not the NZH.
Nah, I think Olwyn meant the piece I linked to, which was in the Herald, not fb. It got a good going over here at TS at the time. There is simply no similarity to what Shearer said, so those commenters who claimed that Shearer has nicked her story are wrong.
Ok.
This appeals to the same sentiment, even if the details and benefit are different:
“The hardest week to door-knock was when we were telling people – who had just come home from a day’s work earning the minimum wage – that it was a great idea to extend their Working for Families tax credit to beneficiaries. “So what’s the point of working my guts out all week while someone sitting at home on the dole gets the same tax credit as me?”
I guess it depends on whether she was reporting a fact or advocating a position based on that fact. The quote suggests the former, but there seems to be a lean toward the latter on the RNZ segment.
This is something I also find worrying, and apparently it is coming up in England as well. It is the shift in focus from “those who must sell their labour to live” to “those who work.” And when the speaker smells a challenge coming up, they add something along the lines of “Of course we care about unemployment and we intend to grow the economy.”
Step one, the shift of focus, deftly slices off those who must sell their labour in a market with few buyers. Step two pretends that growing the economy is automatically a response to unemployment, when it is not. What is called growth now is normally the concentration of wealth into fewer hands, with no substantial employment prospects attached, except perhaps in the designing, building and furnishing of McMansions in ex-working class areas.
If you read the rest of the article that Olwyn linked above/below (?), you will see Pagani is advocating a position – and, most disgustingly one that claims the Labour Party are for working people, and, thus, the plight of unemployed beneficiaries, are really not what Labour’s about….although she does confuse the issue a bit by saying that Labour will always be there for working people when the jobs disappear.
Pagani kept going on about a truck driver she talked to who said that National was for the rich and Labour was for beneficiaries, and nobody’s there for him…. so Pagani takes this as fact? Instead of challenging such false perceptions? She then says Shearer’s reference to the roof-painting beneficiary was to assure the truck driver, that beneficiaries have also to show some responsibility…?
I would have thought the first thing Labour (or an opposition) should do, is challenge the Truck-driver’s false perceptions, and look wider at the perceptions of diverse people. Labour is hardly being the champion of beneficiaries – more it’s been targeting the middleclasses.
At least the truck driver has a job, that pays reasonably well.
Pagani’s constant repetition of the truck driver anecdote was just plain irritating in so many ways.
And the dismissal of TS participants as the extreme of the left that few ordinary Kiwis take note of, just shows how both Pagani & Hooten are positioned more to the (mythical, or socially-constructed notion of) the “center”. These days that “centre” is the position of the MSM and leans to the neoliberal/neocon version of the “right”.
I agree Carol. I would really prefer that Labour campaigns on reality rather than feeds what are often wrong perceptions.
And as for TS participants as being described as “far left” I suggest that we should adopt that particular badge with pride! If being of the far left means dealing with reality and refusing to pander to the prejudices of the ill informed then so be it.
Reality has a radical left bias.
Reality is subjective.
Nah mate. Gravity kills.
sheesh If TS is generally ‘far left’, then where does that leave the likes of myself and a wee few of the commentators here? ‘Outside left’ and falling off the side of Pagani’s imaginary wee flat earth?
The show should be renamed “from the centre right and from the far right”.
🙂
Bill, one of the other authors referred to you as the resident radical the other day 🙂
Yeah I have a tendency to view myself as rather right in most things. But after looking at the National for a few decades, I am starting to view myself as merely a hopeless bigot against stupidity.
I’m wondering if they get all this middle class and centre rubbish from the US and A. The stories certainly sound like they’ve come from an American neocon think tank, with a few adjustments for local conditions.
Having managed to pull the plug on RadioNZ’s nine to noon i had the delight of totally missing what was said about the Standard this morning,
You can bet tho, that the weekends posts and comments had at least someone(s) sit up and take notice, (otherwise there would have been no comment made on a nation-wide radio broadcast),
What is noticeable from the Pagani’s of this world is any attempt to move the discourse away from the supposed ‘sickness beneficiary cheat’ versus the ‘heroic worker’,
It’s there that Labour want the debate held, not where it should be, the ‘real cheats’ to be found in the 7 billion dollars of due taxation criminally evaded every year in New Zealand,
Neither do Labour wish to have a conversation about the other arm of ‘tax cheating’, avoidance, where another approx: 7 billion dollars of tax is ‘legally evaded’ by the use of ‘smart’ Lawyers and accountants to manage their clients earnings in such a way as to make it ‘legal’ for them to avoid paying the due taxation,
i don’t think we, as in the broad left, should for one moment allow the Shearers, Pagani’s or anyone else the luxury and the lies of making the conversation about whether the beneficiaries are deserving of the crumbs that are swept off of the table in their direction,
What we all should be doing is keeping the pressure up on the likes of Shearer/Pagani until such time as THEY change their attitudes and begin to defend those reliant upon benefits,
The Standard tho has obviously struck a chord in at least part of the Labour Caucus, whether that chord has caused enough disquiet in ‘their’ comfortable realm to have ‘them’ re-examine ‘their’ attitude only time will tell,
i don’t believe tho, that our criticisms/critiques of where we see the Labour Caucus as having the wrong focus should be lessened nor softened…
A Christchurch “start-up” promises to mbillable fortune out of “omission free car running on compressed air”, Mesh-computing and an innovative Solar Tech. Snake-oil. It is called IndraNet.
The professionals of Christchurch gets paid hansomely to put prospectus together.
The gullibles of Christchurch put in $19m. All gone in fees and salaries to the chosen few. And $2m in debts.
Who was the advisor “in a professional legal capacity”?
Amy Adams, John Keys pick for Minister for Communications and Information Technology.
Links?
/twitch
I see they think they can do broadband over power-lines…
Which is a massive pipedream due to mains power being rather “noisy”, leading to very high information loss compared to standard telephony or cat-cable connections, which have noise filtering and spike management built into the network infrastructure.
Hell, you’d be better of using Wi-Fi repeating stations, but CHCH doesn’t have the density outside of the CBD to make them economically effective for a mesh network at present.
And don’t get me started on compressed air cars.
I loved their computer simulation of the network. Whoever came up with that has to be taking the mickey.
But they’re soooo preeeeetty!
By the elder things it so easy to dupe rich people with pretty graphics O_o
A Christchurch “start-up” promises to make a fortune out of “omission free car running on compressed air”, Mesh-computing and an innovative Solar Tech. Snake-oil. It is called IndraNet.
The professionals of Christchurch gets paid hansomely to put prospectus together.
The gullibles of Christchurch put in $19m. All gone in fees and salaries to the chosen few. And $2m in debts.
Who was the advisor “in a professional legal capacity”? Amy Adams, John Keys pick for Minister for Communications and Information Technology.
That is interesting.
I looked at Indranet, back when it started. The concept looked sort of sound BUT there was too much hype in the prospectus and too make it work you needed a lot of buy in.
What is your source for Amy Adams involvement? (I could find any on a quick search)
NBR, pay-wall content. And article by David Williams today.
In 2005 these were the parties involved in the company:
Major shareholders: Managing director Louis Arnoux with 21.76 per cent (assuming the $5 million is raised), a trust associated with director Dan Hilgendorf with 11.47 per cent, a company associated with alternate director Peter Mcaulay with 11.47 per cent, a trust associated with director Andrew McGregor with 11.18 per cent and a trust associated with chairman Russell Fitts with 9.17 per cent.
* Key executives: Managing director Louis Arnoux, chief executive John King and commercial development manager Richard Punter.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10115833
Indranet looks like 100% scam. There’s absolutely nothing of substance on their website.
I can’t see how anyone got ripped off though.
An “omission free car” by definition would have had full and open disclosure about everything.
Shearer is ‘happy with the behaviour’ of his MPs.
You can forget last week and move on.
PG? Dog 🙄 !
Sausage 🙄
Bill O’Rees and DV 21 and 21 1
This sounded interesting so I looked up Amy Adams in wikipedia and about her there is little. She is in her forties, she went to Rangitoto College, she got her lawyer’s degree and her house was on a fault line but after the earthquake was judged fit to live in. She is married and has two children so that’s all we know.
I looked up The Press for IndraNet and Amy Adams but she was absent. But stuff had lots on IndraNet Technologies – fascinating and tied up with Hubbards wonderful investments, ie full of wonder. I supply the links below.
This is a very incisive report on IndraNet Technologies from Business writer Jenny Ruth in 2006.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10115833
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/blogs/eco-centric/1880269/Running-on-air
http://www.stuff.co.nz/…/Statutory-report-reveals-risk-investing-in-Hubbard-funds
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/3490786/Not-insolvent-says-IndraNet
The link relating to IndraNet and Hubbard sort of vanished. I think this is similar
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/opinion-analysis/4202438/Statutory-report-reveals-risk-investing-in-Hubbard-funds
and this re Hubbards is informative for those who haven’t followed the case.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/business/6962215/Hubbard-accounts-largely-fictional
This coment from report on Hubbard’s dealings refers to IndraNet.
6/10/2010 Statutory report reveals risk investing in Hubbard funds
Companies Office records show HMF as being a shareholder in mobile mass spectrometer company Syft, headphone noise reduction company Phitek and IT Mainland, an associate of the infamous Indranet which now describes itself as a “green energy” company.
IT Mainland and Syft are close to investment wipeouts, while Phitek’s published accounts still show losses.
And while I was looking at reports of Hubbards financial dealings I read this other item from business journalist Chalkie who has a bright and informative style. ‘Accounting rules muddy the waters.’ A warning from the end of the piece –
“The episode sadly reinforces the pitfalls for investors in our sharemarket. These days, accounting standards are so complex that a keen private investor needs the instincts of a predator, the suspicion of a police officer and the analytical skills of Sherlock Holmes.”
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/opinion-analysis/7452876/Accounting-rules-muddy-the-waters
Blow me down.
Shearer needs to do better.
He has just released a press release suggesting that the Labour Party caucus has met and he is satisfied with the behaviour of his MPs.
Two tiny problems:
1. Caucus has not met recently and does not meet until tomorrow.
2. If he is satisfied with the behaviour of his MPs I would hate to see the day where he was dissatisifed with their behaviour.
I guess this is what Anne meant when she said give them a chance to tell their side of the story.
Is it the back side or the front side – I can’t tell.
offside?
The view from the top side of Labour seems startlingly different than from down here.
To be fair, he does not claim that caucus has met.
Clearly though, someone has – I wonder who that/they could be?
Probably happened in a bar late one night, at this rate.
I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt. But he apparently said
“we’ve had a discussion in caucus (and with) the caucus members and (it’s) behind us now”.
This reads like the transcript of something he said rather than a press release. There might be enough wriggle room to get out of that but the meaning seems pretty clear to me.
Those who say “give Shearer time” are really saying “let’s waste time”. More time for what?
The drip-drip-drip of discontent. It’s not as visible as a big fight, but it does far more damage in the long run.
“I wonder who that/they could be?”
hmm. Maybe go to the link and take a squiz at the picture inset to the right of the main story? That’d my punt for one of who the ‘them’ are. And it seems you could even call in and ask him! Wouldn’t expect any kind of straight answer, mind. That’s if there’s any answer at all….
edit. It’s a historical link. Probably the response then?
I suspect Shearer will be dissatisfied with their behaviour on the day they promote policy that challenges the status quo. None of the rest seems to matter, as long as neoliberal dogma isn’t challenged.
I doubt Shearer would deliberately mislead. I suspect something is lost in translation. And the useless Labour press people (who might be complicit in the Garner screw-up) probably twisted it.
I can’t imaging him leaving himself open to criticism by the vast majority of the Causus. But it is getting worse. Someone has to tell Shearer, that when you are in a hole you should stop digging.
I wonder if the whole thing of becomming Leader before one has decided that Parliament is really the great life had overwhelmed him. He is acting like someone who is bewildered or punch-drunk. He needs a Holiday!
Perhaps AWOL!
sad, mad or bad news from radionz or maybe all three methinks…
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/world/113125/abnormalities-found-among-butterflies-since-fukushima
http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/120809/srep00570/full/srep00570.html
Further research sounds like a good idea, a very good idea – maybe we could pull some off weapons development…
I’m just going to post Paddy’s link again, it’s so good (i.e bad). Also means we don’t have to respond to PG … 😉
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/auckland/news/nbpol/439929317-shearer-happy-with-behaviour-of-the-caucus
Apparently the meeting ended with a chorus of “If you’re happy and you know it”, led by the leader on guitar, with Trevor playing bongos on his head.
Thanks goodness the Games have finished.
Well done to all the competitions (and their support teams) who gave it their all to achieve the best they can. Some are pretty inspirational.
Hang your heads in shame all your corporate sponsors who used such competitors’ efforts in bad faith:
http://truth-out.org/news/item/10830-corporate-sin-washing-embracing-the-olympic-brand-pays-off-for-sponsors
Carol, you can hardly blame the corporations, which only to what they are “in business” to do, exploit!
If you want to look in the direction of the IOC, then you will be closer to mark of finding where the sell out really happens, although do not be surpirsed when links between the corporate worls, and the sporting committees are closer than might be desireable.
Both the IOC and corporates influence each other, muzza. The professionalisation of sport, along with corporate sponsorship has occured over time, witht he main impetus coming from corporates., and the Murdoch-style corporate media. Now the IOC has made themselves dependent on corporates in order to keep reproducing the kind of event that the private TV companies will televise.
Now watch the rot set in at the village…. All those flash video presentations of its future will fall flat, there is to much depravation in the surrounding area, plus the UK Government has failed to address any of the structural problems with the economy.
Why with these Olympics (and other flashy events) am I reminded of the Roman Emperors putting on gladiatorial games to sate the masses. Times really have not changed.
Rather than being the transport system of the past, rail is increasingly becoming the transport of the future (something Matthew Hooton fails to appreciate).
http://localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/rail-is-worth-investment.html
Agreed entirely. In Auckland in 20 (or 10?) years time our next generation will praise us for building the inner city loop. Or curse us for continuing to build motorways.
Because when oil starts to run out there will be a stampede towards a transport system that does not rely on petroleum. I hope we have made the electric rail system robust enough to manage.
We won’t have as the RWNJs will be there complaining about doing so every step of the way. Then, when it becomes obvious that cars are no longer viable, they’ll immediately blame the left for preventing the building of the necessary infrastructure.
TO The Labour leadership team (whoever you are)
I know you think the Standard comments are just a bunch of ultra-lefties, who can be ignored. You’re wrong. I haven’t been “radical” since my hair started to disappear, a long time ago. I’m a soggy centre-left liberal. I *heart* Clark and Cullen. Like many Labour voters, I don’t ask for a Socialist Utopia tomorrow … I just want a better country, bit by bit. I thought you did too.
But you are incredibly, staggeringly incompetent. I am no “insider”, so I have no idea why you are so hopeless – but you are. And it’s high time you faced up to it.
Here is one very small example, from today. Multiply it many times over, every day, and you have Labour’s performance, not just this week, but for years now.
Today – MMP review.
Therefore – Politicians respond to MMP review. As of 3 pm, parties such as NZ First, ACT and the Greens had put out a press statement.
Meanwhile, a whole bunch of interested parties (academics, pressure groups etc) had put out their statements. They had analysed the report and commented on it, in detail.
This is not surprising. The MMP review was a scheduled event, in the diary. So anybody with any interest in this important issue was ready for its release.
NONE of these people or parties have the resources available to the Labour caucus/leadership. So why are you always the slowest? Not just today … every day.
Why does nothing ever change? What is going on? Please, explain. Engage with us. Talk to us. Do you have any idea how frustrating it is – day after day after day – to wait for Labour and/or Shearer to say something – and then to hear that something is barely incoherent.
Please don’t say “it’s the media”. We’re not stupid. We can read Scoop, or Red Alert, or twitter or any of the umpteen DIRECT channels to communicate with us. But – day after day – there’s nothing. Or there’s flannel. It’s so disheartening. It really is.
Usually people sign off a rant like this with “I’m not voting for you!”. And right now I feel like I won’t. But here’s the thing … I want to vote Labour. I always have.
Do you want my vote, or have you just given up? Because it really feels like you have. Please prove me wrong.
Cheers.
Well, it seems that within the last hour or so, Labour (Dalziel) has posted a comment on the MMP review (time recorded 15.19). When I looked an hour or two ago, the other 2 articles posted today were at the top of this page:
http://www.labour.org.nz/news
Late for it to surface, though.
And I see no press release from Shearer today re -talking to his caucus about their divisions.
And posted on Scoop at 3.51pm:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1208/S00172/labour-welcomes-mmp-proposals.htm
The last of the parties to put out a press release, three hours after I wrote one for them on the other thread. In my lunch break.
I respect Lianne Dalziel, but the leader should be fronting this. I suppose they couldn’t trust him to get through the sound bite without mangling it.
Shearer reminds me of the Cheech and Chong classic, Dave, Dave who, Nah Dave’s not here…
Well, he’s certainly not on the TV news. Unlike Peters, Dunne and Banks – who were also on the radio, several different stations, earlier today, all talking about the major story – MMP.
It was entirely predictable that it would be the big story, so Shearer … disappeared.
Genuine question: What was the Labour leader’s diary today?
More importantly: What will his diary be during an election campaign?
How the hell is this strategy going to work?
Same way it worked for Goff before him.
Maybe Shearer did get shoulder-tapped by National when he got back to NZ, and they said “the Labour party are going to offer you a job. We want you to take it.”
gobsmacked
I’ve noticed that there is often a mixup in the words diary and dairy. Perhaps Shearer is down at the dairy having a thickshake – unfortunately at the wrong place at the wrong time. Thickshakes take a lot of sucking to get through. You would be right to say – the situation really sucks.
The last of the parties to put out a press release, three hours after I wrote one for them on the other thread. In my lunch break.
Which pretty much tells us clear as day that it wasn’t a big issue to them. I guess some very clever person in the leader’s office decided that it didn’t fit the heart-warming heartland narrative of the week, never mind that no one gives a fuck about that.
Um it was but the stifling system they have put in place means they cannot respond quickly or appropriately. Labour really sucks at social media …
Surely not! They must have people with years of experience posting incredibly boring tweets to @philgoffmp …
Even by traditional means though, they were slower than every other party. Something broke down.
Just “media” would do there micky.
… or just end the sentence at sucks.
Aye
/BashHeadToDeskRepeatedly
Thank you for writing this post gobsmacked.
It is what I have wanted to write…as a long term Labour Party member and former candidate.
+1
The other day I suggested there were two sides to every story and there always is… Some people interpreted the comment the wrong way but maybe that was my fault. I should have been clearer what I meant.
The fact is, some of us have been saying much the same sort of thing within our local electorate Labour structures for the past 3 to 4 years, but to little avail. I don’t really know why, but have to assume the hierarchy are still listening to the wrong people.
Anyway it was a succinct post and came from the heart. That is what Labour should be about! Thanks gobsmacked.
Anne, it’s time we make them listen to the right people.
😈
I did NOT make this up!
“Shearer happy with behaviour of the caucus”
Felix Marwick, Newstalk ZB August 13, 2012, 12:45 pm
“Labour’s leader is satisfied with the behaviour of his MPs.
It follows a number of distractions for the party that went public last week including speculation about David Cunliffe’s popularity with his colleagues, and Sua William Sio’s warning that Louisa Wall’s Marriage Amendment Bill would cost Labour the next election.”
“Labour leader David Shearer says he’s happy with the discipline of his caucus.”
“Yes I am, we’ve had a discussion in caucus (and with) the caucus members and (it’s) behind us now.”
Mr Shearer says they’re determined to stay focused on the issues that matter.
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/auckland/news/nbpol/439929317-shearer-happy-with-behaviour-of-the-caucus
The issues that REALLY matter according to Dave,
*Do sickness Beneficiaries really deserve the crumbs that are swept off of the table in their direction,
*Why can’t the likes of Grey Power see that raising the age of eligibility to 67 is good for them,
*If we grew more apples and got ‘smart’ with them all our problems would be solved…
Shearer is pretending you and I don’t exist! (See 30 above.)
The issues that really matter according to Dave, (part 2),
*The poor love Mango-skins so much that they will engage in violence to secure them,
*There are 4 Dave’s spreading the gospel according to Dave,therefor Dave will rule the world,
*Two of the Daves might really be Ronny’s, it doesn’t seem right tho that the 2 Ronny’s should rule the world…
it is much easier to be a tory than a committed labour voter.all you have to do to be a tory is have an unquenchable desire to rule over others and the smarts to use a system that is designed to favour anal retentives in their strivings to dominate the poor and weak ( its much harder to dominate the strong and mighty).
thus to be a labour supporter is to have the desire to help your brother with no questions asked.
so who here who claims to be a labour supporter belongs to a branch or has done any work for the party in the last year.
thats the acid test.
Hmmm, an oversimplification and somewhat off-target. Its easy to be a committed National voter because National consistently and always looks after its core voters. Even in the face of significant electoral disapproval over individual policies.
+ 1
The borrow and spend days are over. People are insecure, frightened.
Shearer’s denial above (note 30 at 4:59 pm) is lies. Can you trust a person like this to deal with our economic problems?
If he were PM, Shearer would be saying, “Economic problems? What problems? All our problems are behind us.”
Ahh, Vicky, the IP address that you’re currently using is in the same domain as one blocked because of another user. I’ll look in to this further and see if the block can be removed.
Update: You may be clear to comment now?
Ah… Ok I will have to do a cleanout. But after this weekend – moving back to my apartment at last.
Grand. Hope the move goes well!
So do I! Lyn is in pain as she cuts stuff out to it the new smaller space. I on the other hand are estatic because with epubs I we able to offload my entire book collection to someone else (and keep growing my library)
awesome vicky a bit mean whatd pete he ever do to youse
🙂
because I can’t reply to the original, I will add my reply here (re your post above which Vicky quoted): GOLD. Thank you for the best laugh I’ve had in ages.
RIP Greg. You provided plenty of enjoyment and a few stories !!!!!!
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10826526
Shane Jones was on Native Affairs, representing Labour in a kind of “Leader’s Debate” on current issues like also the recommendations by the commission on MMP.
Hone Harawira, Winston Peters, Metiria Turei and Flavell (for the Maori Party) were present.
I presume that Shane Jones was the preferred Maori member from Labour to appear there. He did disagree with Hone on the richer paying their share (e.g. more tax), saying that Labour did not see that as a kind of right step, they would rather want to grow the economy.
So do I take it then, that Labour is happy with the top income tax rate of only 33 percent (for those earning over 70 k p.a.)?
Just more proof of where Labour now stands, right?
At least a positive news to night, Valerie Adams is now being warded the gold medal, after the Belorussian who won the competition at the Olympics has retrospectively been disqualified, due to having used performance enhancing steroids or the likes.
I think getting silver, and hoping gold gets disqualified, is actually Labour’s election strategy.
Doesn’t look like Key’s on steroids, though. On the vino, maybe.
Dr David Bratt –
The Ministry of Social Development’s and Work and Income’s ‘Principal Health Advisor’ – in charge of managing, mentoring, instructing and supervision Regional Health Advisors, Regional Disability Advisors and also in charge of “training” their “designated doctors”, has a number of “presentations” he likes to show, two of which can be found via these links:
http://www.google.co.nz/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=dr%20david%20bratt&source=web&cd=54&ved=0CEoQFjADODI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rgpn.org.nz%2FNetwork%2Fmedia%2Fdocuments%2FConference2011%2FD-Bratt.ppt&ei=9PooUJvEJOqPiAeP7IC4DA&usg=AFQjCNFEdYN_dDW9BAZvZo_cQpC2rFyelg&cad=rja
http://www.gpcme.co.nz/pdf/2012/Fri_DaVinci_1400_Bratt_Medical%20Certificates%20are%20Clinical%20Instruments%20too%20-%20June%202012.pdf
Not much more explaining is needed re what goes on at WINZ. Remember ACC and the scandal?
That reads like something produced by a libertarian circle jerk posing as a policy think tank. A few weeks of hunger always does wonders to make people decide to stop being paralysed or have cancer? These people are dangerous psychos.
Xtasy
Thank you for your excellent links. Having read the presentations of Dr Bratt I would have to say he is completely moronic. Why even pretend that the Ministry of Social Development even cares about the plight of beneficiaries. To attempt to rationalise their efforts towards beneficiaries as somehow morally just and therefore justifiable is beyond condemnation.
These people care about beneficiaries like ACT cares about humanity. In other words, they don’t care one iota about the future prospects of the marginalised and dis-enfranchised. They just simply want them off their books.
Of course the hand wringing politically left-leaning middle class bureaucrat may well think that their motives are pure and beyond reproach – I can tell you this, they are simply being delusional with a twist of sanctimony. I regard Dr Bratt in this capacity.
No doubt he will bring out some heart wrenching tale about his mum raising him as a solo parent – after his Dad was killed saving a bus-load of toddlers from certain death. No doubt he will say that he was raised in a state-home with bare cupboards and in a poor neighbourhood – surrounded by brown people. They were the only pākehā family in the street.
And there is absolutely no doubt that this marginalised tale of woe will justify, to the ruling class, all manner of abuses towards beneficiaries – because it comes with the attitude “that if I can do it so can you – let me encourage you by making you starve.” Hardly a moral stance. I say to Dr Bratt revisit that hypocratic oath – you’re sounding more like a hypocrit.
It is also highly probable that Dr Bratt was born to professional people therefore has a refined sense of self importance to which I then would say, “is this the best that can be done by the more refined?
Its moronic and it comes across as an indoctrination into the third reich.