The Karam defamation case should be a warning to bloggers and other forum hosts, and anyone who uses social media who thinks they can make unprovable and potentially defamatory comments with impunity.
In her ruling, released yesterday, the judge identified about 50 defamatory statements published on Facebook and on a private website by Mr Parker and Mr Purkiss — members of the Justice for Robin Bain group — to which there was no defence.
Mr Karam said the men had made “an all-out assault on me [in] an attempt to show that I’m shonky”.
He and Fairfax NZ had earlier agreed to settle defamation claims, on a confidential basis, arising from articles on stuff.co.nz that drew attention to the websites that contained the defamatory comments by Mr Parker and Mr Purkiss.
People commenting anonymously may think they are immune from defamation but that could be put to the test legally.
And bloggers who allow open slather comments should note that Fairfax NZ has been also held responsible in this case and have settled privately. I frequently see potentially defamatory comments made on a number of blogs.
Most people being attacked online don’t take defamation action and the attackers probably think they are safe from being held to account.
Parker and Purkiss probably thought they were untouchable and could make unsubstantiated claims with impunity. They may have thought they could exploit the power of free speech.
They may have believed their own hype and thought that believing something was sufficient justification for attacking someone’s integrity. This seems have continued “in choosing to use the defence of truth at the trial”.
Perhaps hose who think they are safe attacking and defaming online should have a good look at this case.
[karol: I don’t know why you chose to make this warning on The Standard, Pete. But The Standard Policy is very strong on not allowing comments that are a legal risk. Also, anonymous comments are not allowed.]
Hey George, are you trying to warn off those people who are questioning the ethics of Peter Dunne, Minister for Legal Highs, not disclosing that the person paid for advocating on behalf of the scum who run the Legal High business is his pride and joy, my son James?
Actually i thought the comments were beginning to resemble commenters on WO and kiwiblog.
I dont agree with many things Pete posts but apart from ownering twice if he was being stupid or naive, I have tried not to stoop.
I do want to point out tinfoilhat that it is not just left commenters either. Srylands repeatedly accuses me of being drunk and others on the right get very abusive.
Yes I agree that there are many on the right that are just as bad.
And I’ve been guilty of some bad behaviour myself, i think we’d all be much better behaved towards each other if we met face to face rather than on the internet which does tend to lend itself to bullying and other bad behaviour at times.
This particular issue was particularly pertinent to Kiwiblog because there were extensive Bain /Karam discussions there with a lot of abuse and accusations and probably defamation. That’s why I posted there first and again on today’s General Debate. No reactionary abuse there and there’s been some sensible discussion on it.
After the usual few have calmed down addressing the issue rather than attacking the messenger seems to be taking over here. It’s an important issue for all who comment in social media.
One comment on KB from Nostalgia:
Trade Me have also settled. TM was the nest of this and ignored advice that they were indeed a publisher in the first instance and responsible for third party posts in the second.
Parker now claims that he only had a small membership, that’s irrelevant and in this case his ‘followers’ posted the defamatory material on this blog and else where.
KS is running a good model for a blog to ensure it remains legal – others claim not to have the ‘resources’ to monitor their own boards well, that won’t stand up now, nor should it have in the past.
The Herald report skims the surface of the Judgement, but you are right about things being ‘proveable’ and the test is not that “I read it somewhere, or in a paper,” it’s a satisfactory conclusion reached on facts, not repeated mantras or false assertions.
On this board the history is different. Over here the history is of you clogging up threads with passive aggressive bullshit, and of you making weird arguments about what oppositions ought to able to talk about.
Yes, PG does have a habit of talking baloney and leading a discussion around in circles but that’s not a good enough excuse to attack someone without reading what they’re saying first. In this case it was a reasonable point.
The irony there Tracey is that PG commented on the wrong blog. As Karol pointed out, ts authors are already aware of what the legal situation is, and have been very clear on that. If PG wasn’t implying that this case has implications for ts, then he needs to learn how to communicate better.
I doubt there is a single commenter here who has had the policy explained to him more often than Pete, often in great detail and with enormous patience.
It’s the passive-aggressive thing that Pete does, Tracey. The cumulative body of work.
I’m quite sure that if you had commented first on this we would have had, when taken in the context of your previous comments, and also as a comment that stands alone a reasoned comment that doesn’t put in the judgments that Pete does.
Let’s not pretend that this is anything other than the fact that PG creates a whole bunch of distruption, and then decides that he has a right to continue doing so. And then he plays disingenuous.
It’s obvious here that I didn’t ‘create’ any disruption, rather there’s a few very familiar pseudonyms who chose to disrupt something that should be of interest to anyone using social media.
Typical ignore the issue and attack the messenger. It’s something that’s obviously supported here. And then trying to blame me for it is a common part of the game.
But nothing actually goes into defamation because the owners/moderators look for and remove that type of shit. It was well worth posting but now you’re getting into your usual BS.
I’m not using a pseudonym, Pete, and I’m happy to agree with others that your contributions at The Standard are frequently disruptive and come across as very disingenuous. This is a case in point – you’ve high-handedly warned “[t]hose who think they are safe attacking and defaming online” when you have a lot of history of making rather nasty insinuations about others. This is an example:
Of course, everything you write is carefully vague, or couched as questions. So you ‘get away’ with basically stating in that post that the entire story about Mojo Mathers’ trip to Masterton was deliberately leaked by the Greens to the Herald in order to ‘sting’ the Taxpayers’ Union and smear the government. The whole conspiracy’s laid out there, including your snide comments about Green supporters expressing their contempt for the TU on Twitter.
It’s just as vicious and personal as anything which I’ve ever seen posted at The Standard, but as far as I can tell you think it doesn’t count as long as you can wring your hands and pretend to be distressed by the muckiness of politics.
You’re right – his pattern of commenting shows he’s just a stirrer, and he plays until he gets caught out not having researched the thing he’s talking about, has his own previous comments with a 180 deg different ‘opinion’ quoted back at him, or is proven comprehensively wrong. Then he just refuses to engage at all.
I understand Tracey’s frustration with people who are sick of PG, but jeez – any look back at his commenting will show he does have a pattern of passive aggressive pontificating and then running.
I don’t think you would have couched your comment in such a way as to start a flame war, Tracey.
Once Fairfax settled it was obvious where the case was going. The remaining defendants were mad to continue it; I suspect a retraction and apology even at that late stage might have brought out some of Mr. Karam’s undoubted generosity.
and if a blogger or commenter defames someone who can afford to sue them. this is an important aspect pete cos bringing defamation proceedings is very expensive and most awards are below 50k.
Some comments there already that recognise the potential implications. And I’ll post again there in today’s General debate (it doesn’t start until 8 am).
Odd but perhaps not surprising that some here have taken this as a threat or somehow attacking The Standard. I think anyone commenting online should be aware of the risks.
Interesting responses to felix, he is one person who on at least two suggested people give you a chance at politicheck and has often taking people to task for suggesting someone else, anyone else, shouldn’t post here.
IMO Felix is one of the worst offenders at this site Tracey, just because he says he’s of the left doesn’t mean his bullying and defamation shouldn’t be called out.
wasn’t saying he should be immune to anything. show me where I said he ought to be? no one is immune from responses to their comments. Just cos you are on the right doesn’t mean you only have to comment on the behaviour of those on the left here. Yet you do so discriminate.
I’m not aware we’ve ever met. You’ve made claims that I think are a way off the mark. Either you don’t know me very well or you deliberately make shit up.
Another irony is passive aggressive accusations. Yes Tracey, I agree, there’s different felixes.
mickey accused me of leading a green attack on cunliffe yesterday. its all through the looking glass these past few days on here. I apologise for calling you as one on the right.
Couldnt agree more Tinfoilhat Felix is just an abusive ranting idiot, he may have said he would give Pete a chance but everytime Pete posts you can guarantee Felix is right behind with his crap along with that idiot OAB never any facts or reasoned and balanced arguements just swearing and throwing their toys out of the cot, it disruptive and boring for those that dont comment often but read often
” I agree, there’s different felixes.” from my comment that “he is one person who on at least two suggested people give you a chance at politicheck and has often taking people to task for suggesting someone else, anyone else, shouldn’t post here”
Has been one of the worst there but seems to have toned down, they’ve made an effort to do that. Wanting to be seen as a more serious site.
It was mentioned briefly there this morning there but wasn’t picked up on. I wanted to see if there was a post on it, they cover a of of relevant things but haven’t been pro-Karam what is not said and posted on can say as quite a bit sometimes. There’s plenty of time yet. You could do it if you wanted to see it there.
It doesn’t seem to have been mentioned at The Daily Blog either, it’s a lottery whether comments are allowed through there. Nor on other blogs. It would have been mentioned at Kiwiblog and here regardless of what I did. More general topics covered at the two more moderate political blogs.
The truth is an absolute defence against libel, Petty George, you bland, banal, biased, passive-aggressive incompetent dishonest waste of oxygen.
Anyone employing you as a fact checker needs their head examined. Your continued employment in the role can only lead to the ridicule and contempt that attaches to you rubbing off on your employer and co-workers.
[karol: the “truth” still needs to be tested in court. The moderators here are very strong on not allowing potentially defamatory comments, where there is no public evidecne available as to whether the accusations are true or not. I’d suggest commenters don’t leep rising to the provocation – it leads to a flame war that, among other things, gets boring for other readers.]
Karol, I think this is something all blogs and participants in social media should be aware of. I know what The Standard policies are.
[karol: your intitial comment did come across as a veiled attack on posters and commenters on The Standard. The anonymity of bloggers had nothing at all to do with the Karam case you cited. It was a provocative statement to post here as starkly as you did. It’s bound to wind people up.]
There’s commenters here who take all sorts of things as ‘veiled attacks’. Most of that is imagined or invented, often that seems to be an excuse for them to attack.
Irony abounds.
[karol: The TS policy states clearly that anonymity and legal risks are not allowed. Your comment pontificated as if people here did not know that. I jumped on it quickly hoping to prevent the predictable retaliations and flame war.]
Lolz OAB, my tech ‘savvy-ness’ has just increased this morning by 100%, my self taught computer use has the odd small gap in the teaching side of things…
Don’t fret Pete, as long as you don’t make demands on our politicians whether Left or Right to do something about climate change.
I don’t recall any Right Winger being called a Goebbels by the lprent for demanding that climate change become an election issue so you should be alright.
Am very interested in defamation myself and am considering taking an action. However the expected award is probably 10,000 to 30,000, with only scaled costs (about a third of the costs of a decent lawyer). So, like many who believe they have been defamed and their business and reputation hurt, I am in a position where taking the action will cost me, and I don’t have the money.
I am glad that karam stood up but I know he could afford to. us ordinary folks sometimes have to accept the appalling malice of others,a nd the damage it causes… until they do it to someone who can fight back.
I understand the need to weed out the vexacious litigants. Ms P Bright and many of her group would come into this category. BUT having a panel or a single judge (not able to hear the actual case) read the initial pracey, view supporting evidence, and decide if a prima facie case exists would be a start.
However, if you have a home and any equity, that’s where the attachment order comes in. When you sell your house, the LA group/crown get their money back.
It was a great comment because it encapsulated the issue i have with pete – his sanctimonious, holier than thou persona is not backed up with reality – I find that irritating.
I’m glad you read it – I may, although i’m not worried personally as I’m usually nice to people 🙂 at least to people i think might not be able to take it. Kia kaha.
I read it cos I have a legal background and at the moment a genuine personal interest in defamation law. I don’t expect most people to wade through a 60+ page judgment.
Nothing to see here folks,there’s been the odd comment recently about the corrupting influence big Pharma could have on our medical ‘profession’ with news that staff employed by the DHB’s had reported $170,000 worth of ‘gifts from the drug manufacturers in a year,
Buried in the ‘Economics’ pages of today’s Herald Online version is a little story which states that one of these giant companies,(incidently the worlds biggest enabler of the manufacture of the drug P with its factory in China cranking 24/7 pumping out the main precursor substance used in the manufacture of the illegal drug), GlaxoSmithKline is under investigation in a number of countries for you guessed it ‘Corruption’,
China, Poland, Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon are all apparently investigating the drug maker and in Poland the company is being investigated for allegedly ‘bribing’ doctors to prescribe the companies drugs,
There is no corruption in New Zealand tho right???, or is that simply because we refuse to look with private medical practice having no legal requirement to report all ‘gifts’ it receives from the drug manufacturers…
While the mud flies at Key and Collins concerning the Oravida dinner, etc, I received a note from a friend in China which puts an important perspective:
‘ I’m aware there has been a lot of publicity about the trade with China, especially in the areas of dairy and meat products. One thing that could investigated a bit closer is: who owns the dairy and cattle farms who are sending so much produce to China? I think you will find they are owned by Chinese business-people. Also, at least one of the largest meat-works in NZ is owned by Chinese interests. So – the trade figures look good but where are the profits going? Don’t get me wrong – this is not anti-Chinese. We love the people here. Voters need to be made aware of the full picture, though. Why does NZ allow the sale of key assets? Australia doesn’t allow it; nor do many of our other major trading partners. When Key visited China and made such a big fuss about the show put on for him, he clearly lacked any knowledge of Chinese culture. What the Chinese Government was saying was: this is what we can do for you; what are you going to do for us? Being described as a good friend of China should also raise some concerns. In business here, if you are a good friend, you are expected to lower your price to the extent you are barely making a profit. I don’t think Key understands the cost of being a good friend. “
He’s going to get a bit of a shock next year when the invitations are no longer forthcoming and he figures out that it was “THE PM OF NZ” that played golf with the President, and had tea with the Queen, and sang the national anthem with the All Blacks.
gotta happen though that, like using lippie makes your lips stop producing their own lip protection, he will lose the ability to assess his environment, completely contrary to his stated aim.
Pete George is a Troll who us threatening Standinastas. He is doing the dirty work of Legal High drug pushers, Chen Palmer and the Dunnes, Pere et fils.
”My Daddy was a bank robber but He never hurt no-body”, the tables appear to have turned, in what appears to be a ‘bank robbery’ the Reserve Bank recently raised the Official Cash Rate which in turn had the Trading Banks cranking up their interest rates,
Basing it’s decision on the ‘expected’ rate of inflation the Reserve Bank is said to be again raising the OCR in April and again in June/July, with every .25 rise in the Official Rate translating to an extra 20 bucks on interest paid for every $100,000 of debt,
Spurred on by the cheer-leading Trading Banks in what looks like a major exercise in profit gouging the Reserve Bank is said to be expected to raise the OCR again despite inflation being lower than expectations for the year coming in at an annual rate of 1.5%,
Given that the ‘expectation’,(from the Trading Banks),is that the rises in the OCR in April and June/July will again be .25 basis points each time this will result in an increase in interest payments weekly of $60 a week for every $100,000 of debt owed in the first 6 months of this year alone by individuals and business effectively kneecapping an economy nowhere near the 3% of inflation where the Reserve Bank could be expected to act,
Consumer information from the Consumer Price Index shows across the board from big ticket items, to clothing and food, prices are stable or falling, the exceptions being the 2.9% rise in retail electricity costs(again), and, a 10% rise in Government Taxation of tobacco products,(which makes all those lives ‘saved’,(snigger),by the upward trajectory in tobacco taxation,(when you consider the role this taxation has in inflation and the Reserve Bank’s response to this), an extremely costly exercise for everyone with an iota of debt,
The only winners in this little equation of raising interest rates off of the back of incorrect data, the Trading Banks who get a ‘free’ jump in profits and the Reserve Bank Governor’s ego who gets to be the ‘enabler’ of the trading banks ‘profit gouge’ and kill off any growth in the economy befor it occurs…
slylands will be along presently to tell you that you are
a. wrong
b. paying extra is a good thing, or the fault of those who bought houses
c. it’s not as bad as 2008 (which English banged on about yesterday to blame Labour and ignore the GFC and gouging financial institutions)
he may or may not discuss how landlords with mortgages will raise rentals.
last month the cost of poultry, meat, fruit and vegetables rose.
Ah it all depends on how and what you eat Tracey, poultry and meat are off my menu, as is butter and cheese,
i can get 3 meals out of a $7 Wharehou fillet, and,buying the fruit and vege at the weekend market has allowed me an extra ten(at least)in my pocket at the end of the week while the volume of fruit and vege has risen by at least 50%…
Depends how you look at fish Tracey, ,my $7 fillet turned into two hunks big enough to make two separate meals,(in tinfoil steamed in the juices along with a bed of finely chopped onion and a cap of sliced tomato, an optional squeeze of lemon juice or a dab of honey right in the middle of it to get the mind singing),
Plus a decent enough amount left for a bowl of raw fish saturated with lemon juice which along with the onions and tomatoes soaking in the coconut cream is a good meal,(tonight’s tea),
i can understand the ‘meat-eaters’ comparison tho, i used to ‘judge’ the price of fish against how much fish i could buy measured against how much beef or pork i could get for the same amount of coin,
Sure by volume you get more Pork and Beef for the bucks, but then, the ‘jam tart’ gets a load more bad fats for the sake of being economical…
If you can get a good price on shallots, I find they work better with fish than onions due the milder, almost sweet flavour.
That’s it, I’m going to stop at the fish markets on my way home tonight.
Plus a decent enough amount left for a bowl of raw fish saturated with lemon juice which along with the onions and tomatoes soaking in the coconut cream is a good meal,(tonight’s tea),
I do something similar, soy sauce, cubed hard tofu, chopped onions, finely chopped sweet peppers – leave to marinate for at least 30 mins.
Get a baking dish and place a couple of fish fillets (where the flesh will still hold together), tip the marinade on top of it, spinkle a few breadcrumbs and bake.
Serve with whatever seasonal veges you have on hand.
Hmm, chives have a much sharper flavour than shalotts.
I am lucky enough to have handed down from my grandmother a variety of multiplying leeks that are in size, somewhere between chives and spring onions, and are stronger in flavour than chives.
Fantastic for all sort of dishes, though I find them just a little too strong for scrambled eggs so I tend to go with parsley or garlic chives.
Ode to Money (and John Key)
hat tip owed to Lorde, of course.
Last night she received another award. And prizemoney. She said she doesn need the money as much as others and asked for the prizemoney to be divided amongst the nominees. In sport you constantly hear the refrain “who would turn down a money to break a contract”. In the business world you constantly hear about how |everyone” would do the same (low ethic) thing in that position.
I’ve got many diamonds in the flesh
I cut my teeth on dollar dealing in the trade rooms
And I’m proud of my addresses,
Parnell and Hawaii, livin off dodgy dealins
Cos every speech is like I’m funny, safety’s loose, dyin in the workrooms
Blood stains, wages down, trashin’ all the unions,
We don’t care, we’re driving BMW’s on main streets.
But I just love Cristal, Maybach, diamonds on my timepiece.
Jet planes, islands, bodyguards on a gold leash.
I don’t care, I’m not caught up in your need for welfare.
And I wanna be royal (royals).
I can buy that strain of blood’
That kind of luxe is just for us.
I crave a celebrity sized buzz.
Cos I became your ruler (ruler),
You can call me Lord Key
And stoolies I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule.
Yea, I’m living that fantasy.
[Verse 2]
My friends and I—we’ve cracked the code.
We count our millions at the donor parties.
And everyone who knows us knows that we’re fine with this,
We do anything for money.
Cos every speech is like I’m funny, safety’s loose, dyin in the workrooms
Blood stains, wages down, trashin’ all the unions,
We don’t care, we’re driving BMW’s on main streets.
But I just love Cristal, Maybach, diamonds on your timepiece.
Jet planes, islands, bodyguards on a gold leash.
I don’t care, I’m not caught up in your need for welfare.
And I wanna be royal (royals).
I can buy that strain of blood’
That kind of luxe is just for us.
I crave a celebrity siezed buzz.
Cos I became your ruler (ruler),
You can call me Lord Key
And stoolies I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule.
Yea, I’m living that fantasy.
Ooh ooh oh
I’m bigger than I ever dreamed,
And I’m in love with being Lord.
Ooh ooh oh
Life is great without a care
I’m not caught up in your need for welfare.
And I wanna be royal (royals).
I can buy that strain of blood’
That kind of luxe is just for us.
I crave a celebrity siezed buzz.
Cos I became your ruler (ruler),
You can call me Lord Key
And stoolies I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule.
Yea, I’m living that fantasy.
This needs to be set to music with the backing video of Key wining and dining and living it up with the Royals.
Brought here by Key in election year to epitomise the principal of a glittering born to rule elite, that Key seeks to stamp on the consciousness of this country.
I miss Phil too. Seems even Bad does. I think it is the healthy diet turning Bad into a nice guy, we may have to call him Sweet12 soon. He just needs to drop the fish, too much mercury or it will be Mad12!
Ffffing Mad is an epithet often attached to me round here,(i think there is some documentation in the box under the sink that somewhat supports this allegation, although of the 3 ‘doctors involved there appears to be an inability to reach a consensus)
Mad/bad12 as a handle might have been confusing for those logging on to the Standard in the morning,(especially me, its hard enough coping with being a million different people from one day to the next without having to ascertain my ‘mental’ state every morning, so best stick to bad),
Miss Phill, nah not a bit,(that might provoke his return), in relation to Phill V PG, well yeah Phill was way more fun,(my idea of fun tho having to be tempered against expectations of being caned),
i have it in my mind that i will have to greet Phill’s BS with either ignorance or 🙄 to avoid having myself ‘going down in flames’ upon his return, but, probably wont be able to resist…
Heh, Heh, Heh, certainly ‘counted’ in that little ‘contest of ideas’, Phill only brought one to the debate, idea that is, it encapsulated my impression of the sum total of His intellect and as far as ideas go simply added a No…
Final electoral boundaries are due to be announced today. I am interested in the result as my home is about 50 metres away from the edge of the draft New Lynn electorate boundary and if it moves towards me then John Key may become my local MP …
Due to golfing and drinking considerations this office no longer takes appointments, however Mr Key is always happy to speak with his constituents, hear their concerns, and help where he can. To arrange a meeting, please approach either Antione’s Restaurant or The Northern Club with a minimum of $5000 in cash.
My Mum and Dad aren’t to happy about to electoral boundaries too, they live in a part of Hei Hei that could be a tory seat by tonight and they have in touch with Mike Mora (He and merry bunch are trying to stop the change) to stay in a Labour held electoral seat where their 2 votes will count.
“We’ve had droughts before but the last decade has seen, in my opinion a lot more droughts and coming more frequently and closer together so the impact is huge now….”
Normally speaking anyway, this farm is self sufficient in its milking platform which is 250 cows, that is we make enough feed on farm usually to support stock to supply through dry periods such as this, as long as they are not extensive so long as it is a normal dry summer….
Now we are buying in Palm Kernal…..
Palm kernal prices are over $300 dollars so it is expensive.” Brent Erceg Dairy Farmer, Mata
“Three droughts in four years is not something we would expect the usual is perhaps one maybe two so to have three in four years has placed a huge strain on the Northland economy….
This is our third drought in four years so it’s huge this time and its a little bit later than usual…. Julie Jonker Northland Rural Support co-ordinator
“The speed that it has dried off and the speed that it has disappeared has been the worrying thing for us but in the last three weeks the grass growth has just stopped…
It is not just the farmers who are going to get hammered here it is all of the rural people…..” Bob Campbell Dairy Farmer, Waiharara
Rain is still on track to spread across the country this weekend, bringing much-needed relief to the parched North Island and parts of the South Island heading the same way.
The remnants of Cyclone Sandra and a weather system in the Tasman Sea would move across the New Zealand from late tomorrow, bringing wet weather until Monday, the MetService said.
Severe weather warnings were in place for Westland, Nelson and Buller.
Farmers are experiencing widespread drought from an extended dry spell, with the entire North Island declared a drought zone and parts of the South Island getting drier by the day.
The announcement was made on a Manawatu sheep and beef farm by Primary Industries Minister Nathan Guy this morning.
Northland, Auckland, Waikato, Bay of Plenty and Hawkes Bay have already been declared to be in drought…..
“ACT OF GOD”
Federated Farmers president Bruce Wills said he could not recall a time when the entire North Island had been in drought….
“These are people that are suffering through no fault of their own, through an act of God. We have real concerns about the emotional stress and difficulties that many families are coping with and that’s the predominant benefit that comes from a drought declaration.”
Yup, he will be voting for the climate change deniers again… and asking all of us to subsidise his union members because he thinks his invisible friend in the sky is responsible.
PS I know Act of God is an insurance/legal term, but he is still deliberately framing his comment this way. ie climate change denier and farmers don’t choose where to farm, what to farm, or to stay farming.
“Yup, he will be voting for the climate change deniers again… and asking all of us to subsidise his union members because he thinks his invisible friend in the sky is responsible.” Tracey
Officially only ACT and the Conservatives deny the reality of human induced climate change
“Another week and no drought declaration yet it is the second driest year on record in Waikato, and my has it revealed some peoples true colours! Default settings with graziers contracts are being ignored, and cooperatives are pretending there is no drought.” James Houghton Federated Farmers Waikato provincial president
I don’t think Bruce Wills and the Feds are climate change deniers, and so are unlikely to vote for ACT or the Conservatives. Like the “cooperatives”, (Fonterra?) the Fed and Wills are ignorers.
In this area there is a lot more electoral choice.
In fact there is a whole vipers nest of climate change ignorers, right across the political spectrum it’s a much bigger field with lots to choose from.
“You know what really strikes me about climate change in the election? It’s the absence. It is as if climate change is nearly completely absent from the campaign. When climate change does pop up, it’s portrayed in simplistic soundbites.”
Meanwhile back in the jungle, it appears that the recent trip to China by Slippery the Prime Minister to sort out ‘trust’ issues over the Fonterror false positive whey scare worked so damn well that Fonterror’s whey products are still banned from that country,
Quoted on RadioNZ National news this afternoon the PM claims that there is no ban in place the Fonterror whey products are ”just not allowed into China as the Chinese await a New Zealand Government report on the original ‘contamination”,
i have the impression that inside the mind of our Prime Minister is a cracked CD firmly stuck on BULLSHIT which forces Him to find novel definitions for everything…
Heard about the Oravida expansion into gold mining in NZ on Radio Active this morning, on the regular Thursday morning slot with Redbird, Alistair Thompson and Grant Robertson. Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse……….!
Thompson’s view was that APN and Fairfax haven’t covered the Collins/Oravida saga consistently due to the lack of investigative journalism and that there is much more to uncover. He did suggest however that the story may have reached a tipping point and the MSM would have to start paying more attention. He also suggested that despite Key’s complicity in the saga that it’s possible that her position as Minister may be untenable……
“People commenting anonymously may think they are immune from defamation but that could be put to the test legally.”
Leaving aside the fatuousness of how that comment has been phrased, it’s point is actually wrong. The people that got sued were the people that published the defamation, not that people that made comments ie the website owners and Fairfax. It’s an important distinction.
this is why people need to read the decision before posting it. the decision has all anyone need know. the media will have relied on a press release. I read the decision before coming here to post about it.
its this part of petes posting that bothers me about his new position at politicheck. editor has a skill set and it is disrespectful to those who have these skills and experience to say you can just become one. like slater and the truth.
Haven’t had time to look at the decision. Were commenters mentioned at all? I’m curious at what level FB was accountable. Was FB approached to remove comments?
Agreed about PG/politicheck. That he won’t take feedback about this or his behaviour also is a concern.
+1 and what does it say about politicheck that such a partisan wannabe polly can get such a gig.
PG is part of that CT architected media landscape with a probable mandate to produce as much inconsequential waffle as his copy/paste allows across blogland.
“The people that got sued were the people that published the defamation, not that people that made comments ie the website owners and Fairfax. It’s an important distinction.”
Purkiss was judged against for making comments only.
[3] The second defendant, Victor Purkiss, was a contributor to the Facebook page, Counterspin and other sites. Mr Karam has sued him only in respect of comments that he himself posted.
[232] Although Mr Purkiss was responsible for some egregious remarks, I treat him as less culpable than Mr Parker for two reasons. He is liable only for his own posts and is therefore responsible for much less of the defamatory content than Mr Parker.
Although I understand Mr Purkiss was also an administrator, along with Kevin James. One of Kevin’s statements was found to be defamatory but he didn’t get sued.
[2] The first defendant, Kent Parker, was an administrator of the Facebook page “Justice for Robin Bain” and creator of the Counterspin website. Mr Karam has sued Mr Parker in respect of comments that Mr Parker himself posted on these sites and also as the publisher of comments posted by third parties. Mr Parker denied being the publisher of statements by third parties, relying on the defence of innocent dissemination under s 21 of the Defamation Act 1992.
No, one was sued as a publisher the other as an author. I should add, that some of the defamatory statements were written by named people, and they were not sued.
In my decision in Wishart v Murray & Ors I traced the history of US, UK and
Australian decisions that considered publication via Facebook I concluded that the status of publisher in an internet context depended upon editorial control rather than actual knowledge of the existence of defamatory material. A Facebook page is to be regarded as similar to a noticeboard.
[13]I concluded in Wishart that those who host Facebook pages or similar sites
are to be regarded as publishers of postings made by others in two circumstances.
The first is if they know of the defamatory material and do not remove it within a
reasonable time in circumstances that give rise to an inference that they are taking
responsibility for it. The second is where they do not know of the defamatory
statement but ought, in the circumstances, to know that material being posted is
likely to be defamatory.”
Bagelo v Smith seems to traverse the kind of “cut and thrust” commenting that people make here, WO and KB, to name only a few. Courtenay does, imo, send a warning to people who post, namely, that they are not protected from the law of defamation. I suspect she is saying between the lines, that because people are not being sued on a daily basis doesn’t mean they are not defaming people. For example a comment by Kevin James was found to be defamatory, with parker being held responsible as publisher, but James himself was not sued.
part of the reason for this is that people sue the ones with money (hence fairfax or trademe get sued) and I hope, for karam’s sake, the settlements with them covered his legal costs, permitting him to sue the other two on principle. Without knowing anything about either defendant, I wonder if either can afford to pay out? One made no appearance and the other defended himself.
“Baglow v Smith which distinguished internet fora and blogs from other forms of publication.
This distinction was made on the basis that the context of an ongoing debate would reduce the sting of the defamatory comments as sharp and witty replies are seen merely as part of the ‘parry and thrust’ of the debaters.
[29]
However, there is no principled basis on which internet fora and blogs
should attract a different test for what constitutes a defamatory statement.
There may well be a degree of casualness associated with contributions to online conversations
. In this regard they might be likened to talkback radio. However, the capacity for harm
resulting from the permanent nature of posts means that those posting statements
should not be relieved of the usual constraints imposed at law.”
Her honour usefully goes three each alleged defamatory statement and explains why they are or are not defamatory. Not all were found to be defamatory. It makes useful reading to help understand the distinction.
“No, one was sued as a publisher the other as an author.”
Parker “sued Mr Parker in respect of comments that Mr Parker himself posted on these sites and also as the publisher”:
[2] The first defendant, Kent Parker, was an administrator of the Facebook page “Justice for Robin Bain” and creator of the Counterspin website. Mr Karam has sued Mr Parker in respect of comments that Mr Parker himself posted on these sites and also as the publisher of comments posted by third parties.
Purkiss “only in respect of comments”:
[3] The second defendant, Victor Purkiss, was a contributor to the Facebook page, Counterspin and other sites. Mr Karam has sued him only in respect of comments that he himself posted.
I’ve read parts of it since mid-morning-ish but as I’ve already said I need time over Easter to read it properly. Someone I know advised they had a copy before 7 but I didn’t have the time nor need to get one off them then, I knew it would become available soon enough. I’ve also seen useful comments on it, including from lawyers. And I’m sure there’ll be a lot more to be added to the discussion.
but you felt you could post warningss based on something you hadnt read.
i didnt see your comment about needing time to read it over easter, so i reread your opening post
you dont have to wait for lawyer friends, you can google seach judicial decisions online nz, put in karam and bingo.
a new tool for your fax checking armoury.
i thought you wanted to make change, but posting before reading the crucial favts, when they are available to you, not linking to that document and purporting to give advice on it, isnt really what you are trying to achieve are you?
I haven’t read the full file. However, my understanding is that the “cut and thrust” that happens on the Standard is not defamation.
This is what Karam is stated as being unhappy with at the beginning of the case file:
Mr Karam claims that many of the comments defamed him by conveying, among other things, that he lacked integrity, was dishonest, was motivated to support Mr Bain by the prospect of financial gain and had defrauded the Legal Services Agency (LSA).
I think the discussion here has been confusing ad hominems and general personal abuse of the “you’re a dickhead” kind (basically an opinion), with defamation (something far more specific and stated as fact without any evidence supporting it). A certain amount of abuse is accepted on TS as part of the “robust debate”. Defamation is deleted as soon as, because the trustees of the site regard themselves as being the ones who would be taken to court over it.
So something more general stating someone lacked integrity would be allowed. But something like that quoted above (allegations that Karam “had defrauded the Legal Services Agency”), is getting far more specific and could be supported or not by evidence – without evidence, it could be judged as defamation.
On TS, it’s more usually “pointlesss” abuse that gets moderated, especially if it looks like tr0lling or a deliberate thread derail. But other abuse is often left unmoderated.
In Karam’s case, the complaint was that there had been a concerted attempt to damage his reputation over time. So the general “cut and thrust” on blogs where people abuse each other, probably wouldn’t count.
the comment must lower the persons reputation in the eyes of an ordinary person. that is a very nutshell version of one of the main tests.
hence calling a politician a liar is hard to prove as defamation because politicians are frequently described in surveys and polls and by the public as untrustworthy.
it is wrong to think only public figures or people known to the public can be defamed.
Agreed. Good eg about politicians. I was just thinking why MPs don’t usually pursue defamation – eg Cunliffe could claim Gower had defamed him in repeatedly stating that Cunliffe had attempted a leadership coup. Generally, there is a fair amount of leeway.
it is wrong to think only public figures or people known to the public can be defamed.
I didn’t say that. I said, it’s more likely. But context is very important, I think.
But, if a non-entity felt they had their work reputation defamed, they’d be more likely to take out a complaint.
i think, with respect, you might be confusing being able to sue for defamation and being defamed. most people simply cant afford to sue to redress the damage done to them or their business. public figures tend to have easier access to funds or pro bono lawyers.
i agree entirely, context of a statement is crucial.
i hope you get time to read the decision, and the wishart ruling. i think you will enjoy the analysis of the statements.
at my first law firm patricia courtenayhad just been appointed a partner. an incredibly earnest and intelligent lawyer who cut her teeth on insurance law. i always enjoy reading her decisions even if i dont agree with every point.
Oh, I imagine if it was some smear against a business person they would want to sue for defamation, whether or not they could afford it.
But I was thinking most non-entities don’t have widespread enough reputation to be damaged. And if something was said/publicised about such people, it would mean little to most of the public – unless it was something extremely sensational,
Most people in the public eye don’t sue people for every single public smear or criticism. Someone with a lot of social capital would probably have the power to refute the allegations without having to take it to court.
I note (in the NZ Herald article) in awarding costs for damages to reputation, the judge took into account Karam’s previous good reputation in various realms of activity – ones that would give him a fair amount of standing in certain sections of the community/public sphere:
In awarding costs (yet to be decided) and damages, the judge said Mr Karam had enjoyed a “positive and significant reputation” before becoming involved in the Bain case, with success in sport and business.
She accepted his evidence of the great distress the comments had caused him and Mr Reed’s description of the defamation as a “full-scale assault on Mr Karam’s reputation”.
PS, I’ll read the judgement another day. I’m still recovering from being battered by an extremely strong and wet gale this morning – a total drenching, after a drive though some pretty treacherous conditions.
What a disaster. Govt debt is 60 billion under Key. And now English wants to claim a surplus!
How corrupt is that, its the false belief that cutting taxes would increase govt revenue, that
ideological nonsense of the right, that has cause this disastrous fiscal mess.
yup, the debt that is defended by saying “it would have been higher under labour”… hard to prove or disprove that, which is not the same as it being true.
Means nothing, if the purpose of the dinner was to impress upon a Chinese border official that Oravida is a very important company that owns its own Minister of Corruption Justice, why on Earth would they need to be overt about it? Her presence would be enough.
Just as John Key promotes Oravida when they pay him to model for them, just as Dan Carter promotes that shampoo by walking past a camera with his hand on his head: nothing need be said.
a private dinnerwith friends, but the advisor says it was short cos people there didnt speak the same language. so collins is friends with people who she doesnt understand and dont understand her?
the advisor doesnt say that border control issues werent discussed…
so to summarise collins private dinner with friends included an employee and at least one person she couldnt speak with due to language differences.
Quite! I ask because the dinner was either private, or official, but surely not both. Does Margaret Malcolm accompany Judith Collins to all private dinner engagements? What about the movies?
Heather Simpson attended quite a few things with Helen Clark – people often develop close friendships with the people they rely on. Yes, it does look bad, but not so bad it couldn’t be perfectly innocent. Way too much confirmation bias here.
National 48.5% (+5.5%)
Labour 28.5% (-3.5%)
Greens 11.5% (-1.5%)
NZFirst 5.5% (no change)
Conservatives 2% (-0.5)
Maori Party 1% (-0.5)
Mana 1% (+.5)
Internet Party 1% (+0.5)
Act 0.5% (no change)
Other 0.5%
Keep up the Orivida attack, it’s such a winning strategy.
Idiots.
The only thing that surprises me is that there is 1% and 2% of people dumb enough to say Internet party and conservative party respectively although perhaps like the 0.5% saying ACT they are just taking the piss out of Roy Morgan.
Oh there’s no doubt that Labour’s in tatters and that the hope they had in Cunliffe was seriously misplaced. I think the Greens will do quite well at this election as people who can’t stand the Nats see them as a better option than labour.
What will be interesting is to see who the Nats try and stitch up a deal with as Winston first is a bit like one of those vampires that you can’t seem to kill even with a stake through the heart.
It will also be interesting to see whether the Nats really have jumped 5% in two weeks – apparently at Lab/Greens’ expense – whether the increase in Mana and the IP’s support continues, or whether the whole poll is a bit of an outlier.
I’d doubt this has much to do with the Collins/Oravida scandal and Labour’s pursuit of it. I’d hazard a guess that this poll is a reflection of voters dislike for disagreements between Labour and the Greens over whether or not to outline potential coalition arrangements in the lead up to campaigning.
No I think it’s voters expressing their displeasure at public disagreement between Labour and the Greens over campaign strategy. For what it’s worth my preferred outcome for the General Election is a Coalition Government comprised of Labour and the Greens plus maybe Mana. But I think the Greens tactic of trying to shoehorn Labour into that position before the election was a mistake and this poll, I think, bears that out. By the way BM have you seen today’s ODT editorial? The one that calls on Key to sack Collins? It’s saying something, don’t you think when one of the conservative daily broadsheets calls for a Cabinet Minister’s sacking?
How could I forget McFlock, I got about as close to them as possible while they were here in Queenstown and to be honest, like everybody else (it seems), my anti-monarchist sentiments melted away like ice in the Sahara. She’s that bloody lovely.
Likewise, that story only broke on 9 April and the poll started on 31 March so I don’t think the Labour/Green thing has yet impacted on any published polls.
Also, I doubt any newspaper editorial counts for anything. Sadly, people don’t read them, except for political tragics like all of us here.
Maybe some effect but certainly not all of it.
Polling was carried out from March 31 to April 14, presumably with most calls completed in the first week – seehttp://www.roymorgan.com/findings/5549-new-zealand-voting-intention-april-17-2014-201404170455 (The second week is usually spent doing call backs if they use the same methodology that other polling companies use.)
The royal tour started on 7 April and the cute Plunket thing wasn’t until 9 April – see http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-william-kate-middletons-itinerary-3206058
Put it this way, I think that by now, David Shearer, despite all his faults, would be regarded as the incoming PM and John Key seen as a two-termer. Labour made a terrible mistake going for David Cunliffe.
Hamish (above) – because he was focussing on the median voter and also came across as an “ordinary kiwi bloke” but one with a social conscience and a background in working for the most disadvantaged people in the world, at personal risk to himself.
Hey Matthew I am brimming with ideas about who should be the next National Party leader and I really want to share them with the right wing. Judith Collins has to be your next leader. No ifs no buts she will lead National to a fifth term. After her I think you should go with either Kanwaljit Bakshi or Paul Goldsmith. Both of these candidates would be excellent leaders and would respect National’s traditions.
And by the way I would get rid of John Key as soon as possible. He is obviously a closet socialist and I expect that he will start the socialisation of the means of production any time now …
I know you jest but he does run a left wing, progressive government. That is why he is popular.
And I hope Judith Collins is the next leader. However it is looking increasingly likely that National will get a third and fourth term. So the next New Zealand Prime Minister may not currently be a member of Parliament.
Micky, please ignore these people.They are not interested in debating with you.
They merely want to waste your energy on nonsense and they enjoy making provocative comments to get a reaction.
Paul, some of us really don’t have better things to do with our time and are quite aware of what the motives are of the people we are engaging with. Call it doing it for shits and giggles if you like.
silence means assent to those types and they never shut up plus i can’t stand reading their bullshit cascades where 2 or 3 of them comment to each other – no, much better to slam dunk them (just about) every time and I appreciate those who enjoy doing that and take the time to. If it becomes excessive – just scroll on by.
Ignore him. You have better things to do with your time.
His job is to spin for right wing interests. His job is a create a narrative or meme ; by discussing it with hIm, you amplify it. The MSM will repeat his words and publicise his views anyway.
He is not interested in genuine debate. As a paid opinion maker for the right, he is only here to divert, distract and disrupt.
I don’t support speeding but i’d like to see an increase in the limit in certain areas (SH1 between Oamaru and Christchurch in particular) + an increase in overtaking lanes
@DTB+100…the slower you go the more fuel you conserve….i once drove in the snow/ice between Chch and Arthurs Pass and back again on one tank and one chain ….a lot of the time it was at a crawl no faster than a horse …5-10 k/hr ….but i passed about 40 vehicles that had skidded off the ice road and I got home
….the lesson i learned was that it is possible to go a very very long way on very little fuel if you drive very very slowly…..no faster than a trotting/walking horse and coach…..so there is hope yet…..when the fuel crisis bites we wont have to jump on a horse or donkey as our ancestors did ….just learn to drive very very slowly…like Granny or Grandad….safer too…and better for your health
The only nonsense around here…is your…posts. I stand by my comment that most NZ roads are not good enough to warrant a speed limit of 120km/hr. Cars are safer, yes, but our roads are not.
@ Weepu’s Beard …. i still think what you say is nonsense ..why go 120km/hr?….no point…if you want to be a racing car driver join a racing club and get on the track …or join a rally car club…or go and live in Germany
……i have seen plenty of people drive past me at 120km/hr only to have me catch up at the next major intersection or lights….. and really speeding does not save much time in NZ, the distances for speed are too short
( btw i used drive my Peugeot at 120 km/hr on occasion on the motorway until i suspected cops were watching for me and my partner got on to me about fuel waste….
@ Weepu’s Beard ..re “most NZ roads are not good enough to warrant a speed limit of 120km/hr. Cars are safer, yes, but our roads are not”….
Our young German visitors from Berlin after travelling around NZ for six months think our New Zealand roads are very good and there is no need to speed here
….They say that in Germany ( with a population of 80 million) there is a movement to put in place speed restrictions because of Co2 emissions.
They do not like using the autobahns because they are too fast/ dangerous and not relaxing ….and the difference in time ( saving about 15 minutes) if you go 160km/hr as opposed to 120 km/hr is not worth the effort
They say Germany has a very good public transport rail system and this is the way New Zealand should go…put the motorway money into cheap affordable Public Transport.
Labour and the Left should invest in Public Transport and axe the hugely expensive motorways which no one wants except NACT property developers and their mates who would like to privatise the roads for tolls and further marginalise and exclude the ordinary NZer from free travel
The money should be put into State education , Public Health hospitals , reduced Retirement age to 65, cleaning up the rivers and lakes , Research and Development, support for technology startups and entrepreneurial business development
Shows the Righties are getting very concerned about the issue of motorways under a Cunliffe led coalition government imo
I wish they’d keep to one speed tolerance level and not do these special holiday period deals. I tend to continue to work (part time) through holiday persiods, and forget when traveling to and from work that there’s been a change of approach.
Was Kelston previously part of the Waitakere electorate, and what will the changes mean for Kelston?
I see our electorate of Ohariu has taken on Wadestown as had been suggested. Come on down from those swanky hills Pinot Noir socialists and vote Dunne out!
(PS, saw your reply on yesterdays Open Mike re the you- know -who commenters. Thats an understandable view you have – I just don’t think those who you are replying to are big on logic and evidence. Cognitive dissonance seems to be more their thing. Agree that clarification may be helpful for the silent readers)
There was a good article about politicians not being from the electorate that they represent a few days ago on the Guardian. Paula Bennett is one of those parachuted politicians – going to where the grass is greener, where they’re more likely to be voted in.
Was Kelston previously part of the Waitakere electorate, and what will the changes mean for Kelston?
The new Kelston electorate has parts from New Lynn (Where I was previously), Waitakere and a part of Te Atatu – if I’m reading the map right.
And I really don’t know what that’s going to mean. I have a feeling that it’s probably going to be good for the people here especially if we get a left MP. I’d prefer Greens or Mana or even Alliance but we’ll probably get Labour.
I have a bit of a soft spot for West Akld from the days when I used to visit my friends out west who were of Dalmatian descent. I never forget their their amazing hospitality. I got the feeling that people were more on the level in the West and it didn’t feel like the natural home of Blue to me – I hope it turns shades of red, green and red/black on 20th September, enough to kick out that faux westie, as Tracey points out, comes from Taupo anyway.
I’m in Kelston, too. It goes as far as Sunnyvale, near Henderson, and out onto the North Western – anyone living on the causeway is in Kelston. And includes part of Titirangi.
I’m still in New Lynn … just. Mind you John Key is going to find out that campaigning in the Waitakere Ranges is not a pleasant experience. Too many of the talented educated people there have far too much concern for the environment.
Yes – note the difference between the NSW situation, where the Premier has resigned because he misled the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption.
NSW has an Independent Commission Against Corruption – New Zealand does not.
High time we did – because – in my considered opinion, New Zealand is rotten with corruption, and our ‘perceived status’ as the ‘least corrupt country in the world’ is nothing more than a sick joke.
Please be reminded that on the watch of Minister of Justice Judith Collins – New Zealand STILL has not yet ratified the UN Convention Against Corruption.
Has she even read it?
It would appear that she has not.
Have these mysterious ‘Cabinet officials’ who purportedly give advice on corrupt ‘conflicts of interest’- read it?
It would appear that they have not.
Here – read it for yourselves – and ask how can it be possible for the ‘least corrupt country in the world’ to have not yet ratified the UN Convention Against Corruption?
What’s going on with Labour and welfare fraud? Last month in an interview:
Gordon Campbell: Does Labour oppose the government’s new welfare fraud policy whereby the partners of welfare fraudsters will be criminally liable for the fraud, and for the repayment of the entire amount – and not simply for the amount from which they might have indirectly benefitted. If re-elected will Labour retain this provision or scrap it ?
David Cunliffe: Scrap it.
Today:
Hon Chester Borrows @ChesterBorrows
Welfare fraud bill passed 102 votes to 17. Thanks to my Parliamentary colleagues for such broad support for these fair, sensible reforms.
Greens, Maori Party (2 votes) and Mana voted against it.
Would Labour scrap legislation they’ve just voted for?
We’ve got ten minutes. I haven’t asked about your welfare policy, so I’ll make it specific. We all oppose fraud. Does Labour oppose the government’s new welfare fraud policy whereby the partners of welfare fraudsters will be criminally liable for the fraud, and for the repayment of the entire amount – and not simply for the amount from which they might have indirectly benefitted. If re-elected will Labour retain this provision or scrap it ?
OK. Sue Moroney explains in her speech, why Labour decided to support the Bill. It has to do with submissions to the select committee by many women who felt they were unfairly being left to carry the penalty for relationship fraud. As I understand it, the women’s complaint was, when a woman fraudulently claimed she was a single parent/woman, the partner was complicit in the fraud, and should be penalised as well as the woman.
Sue Moroney’s speech is here in a video. She also slams National’s beneficiary bashing, especially in a time of high unemployment. She also says tax fraud should be dealt with harshly.
Sue Moroney said if the bill was about fairness then it would be talking about dealing with tax fraud on the same basis. The bill was part of the “relentless beating up” of beneficiaries, but Labour would support it because it had some good points.
Well, vote for it and own then, even if there are bigger priorities.
Saying you’ll scrap it once in power, at the same time as supporting it in the House, just makes Labour MPs look like prevaricating prats.
What it really shows is that the right is still firmly in control of caucus. There are other remedies for the scenario outlined in submissions.
Yes. I don’t agree with Labour on this, and am happy to see that Mana and the Greems didn’t support it.
Saying you’ll scrap it once in power, at the same time as supporting it in the House, just makes Labour MPs look like prevaricating prats.
Although, Moroney indicated Labour had changed their minds upon hearing some select committee submissions. So they weren’t sayign scrap it while simultaneoulsy supporting it.
Labour was stating the two positions simultaneously. Gordon Campbell’s interview with Cunliffe was published on the very day Labour voted for the Bill’s second reading (March 18).
Although, Cunliffe was interviewed on March 10 for that Werewolf article – says so at the beginning of the article. He does seem to be saying something different from what Moroney and Jacinda Ardern said later in debating the Bill and supporting it. Their consistent line was that they wanted to see tax fraud treated as strongly as beneficiary fraud. They were concerned about the low level of evidence needed to find someone guilty of relationship fraud and were supporting an amendment to change that – don’t know if the amendment passed.
Labour could still scrap that particular part of the amendment later on, I guess.
I do think Labour could come out more strongly generally in supporting social security, and turning totally away from the punitive beneficiary bashing policies of National. I would have preferred Labour not to support the Bill.
Yep, I said published, rather than when the interview was conducted.
An eight day lag time. Submissions on the Bill were due last October 10, so the concerns were aired well before Cunliffe’s interview.
I agree with your point about social security, but notwithstanding the issues in this particular legislation, its handling feeds into a bigger perception that the party doesn’t know where it stands.
Well. I think the Labour Caucus is pretty consistent in its main lines – including on how they debated the Welfare Fraud Bill. They put primary focus on employment and jobs, and benefits as a back up to that. They also made a big repeated line about there should be as harsh a penalty for tax evasion as for benefit fraud.
They talk about beneficiary bashing in the context of rising unemployment. So, while they pay lip service to challenging bennie bashing, they want to be seen of the party of employment, jobs, and “fairness” for taxpayers.
Sue Moroney seems to be talking sympathy pandering claptrap.
@DavidCunliffeMP
Welfare fraud, $23 million = National obsession. Tax dodging, $6 BILLION = National doing nothing.
@ChesterBorrows
@DavidCunliffeMP Welfare fraud budget flat after 40% up under Lab, tax fraud budget up 40% under Nats. Actions speak louder than words mate.
I haven’t seen Labour try and substantiate their claims that National are doing nothing on tax fraud (and I asked them).
Borrows’ office provided:
The figures on tax fraud use the “Management of Debt and Outstanding Returns (M57)” appropriation, which I was advised was the best measure of spending on combating tax fraud. The figures given were a 2008/09 budget of $89 million, and a 2013/14 budget of $125 million – a 40% percentage change.
The Vote Revenue budgets are on the Treasury website – obviously the 2013/14 figure is appropriated not actual.
I checked the Treasury website and what is claimed stacks up.
Labour are opposing and complaining a lot but they don’t seem to be doing their homework and backing up their claims, hence whenever they release new policy it’s automatically viewed with skepticism. In contrast Greens seem to have a functional and competent research unit and they communicate far more effectively.
I think there may be differences between how the figures are calculated. Deborah Russell talks about tax evasion as a “fraud” – ie people avoiding taxes through doing things that look legal. So they may not show up the Treasury calculations.
The problem is Labour don’t give many details. Cunliffe talked about tax dodging and they published graphics showing $6 billion of dodging, but I haven’t seen them elaborate.
Yes. Also The Greens have published a lot of info on tax evasion and how National has been lax on it… but I’ve had a long day. I don’t have time or inclination right now for further research. PG’s research seems to have been pretty limited. – tweets hardly amount to indepth research.
No quantifying of “put the most effort into to” at all. And it sounds dubious. For example from budgets:
Management of Debt and Outstanding Returns (M57)
Taking follow-up action where returns are outstanding and where payments are overdue, including providing people with assistance on the actions they need to take to meet their obligations.
2012/13 Estimated Actual $116,874,000
2013/14 Budget $124,896,000
They spend five times as much on Management of Debt and Outstanding Returns as they recover on benefit fraud, which is about five times what they spend on it.
But MacLennan seems to be correct on one thing:
“The total amount of unpaid tax not yet detected is unknown.”
You seem to just be looking for some quick to find stuff that will discredit Labour, and aren’t doing any indepth research into National’s claims. But…. that’d take a lot more time and reading than I want to do right now …. I need some down time.
Pete, tell me, what is the definition of benefit fraud being used? Of those numbers, how many were the intentional, I have no right to this so I am going to tell a pack of lies to get it, kind vs my boyfriend has moved in, but isn’t really contributing to the household yet so I won’t notify WINZ yet?
I’d like to know how much of it is just overpayments by WINZ being erroneously classified as fraud to make the numbers look worse in order to justify another kicking.
Yet New Zealand is ‘perceived’ to be ‘the least corrupt country in the world’ (along with Denmark, according to Transparency International’s 2013 ‘Corruption Perception Index’.
The Otago Daily Times publishes a 100 year old ‘from our files’ column, and I did enjoy today’s, a well argued missive about the pressing need for a servants’ union. Especially in the wake of the visit from the royal family, which among many other businesses in the UK, enforce zero hours contracts on domestic staff.
And in a similar announcement today the National Library and Auckland Council have launched a huge new resource – 82 years of New Zealand Herald has been digitised including letters and announcements and advertisements. It’ll be a fantastic resource for progressive bloggers. Any articles with a “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose” flavour you’ll find something suitably pithy in here to suit.
For a taster here’s Michael Joseph Savage on Labour Policy in 1938 – adequate wages, recognition that productivity gains should go to workers, health service, social welfare and pensions policy. http://bit.ly/1ismYcR
Nigel Evans used to be in Parliament. While there he helped cut legal aid. As a result, people who are charged by the government but found innocent can’t recover costs. Mr Evans is now looking at a (UKP) 130,000 legal bill (plus VAT) after defending successfully against an allegation of sexual assault.
Thing is, he’s actually surprised by this:
He said he was stunned to learn he would have to pay his legal fees even if he was acquitted – plus value added tax.
One wonders if he read the bill before voting on it.
Buzz from the Beehive Transport Minister Simeon Brown dutifully issued advice to all road users to keep safe on our roads during the Easter weekend. He encouraged them to stay safe, plan their journeys ahead of time, and be patient with other drivers while travelling around this Easter long weekend. ...
Oliver Hartwich writes – New Zealanders recently learned about a new feature film. It will be about former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern – and taxpayers will subsidise it to the tune of NZ$800,000. Ardern had nothing personally to do with either the film or the subsidy. But her government’s ...
TL;DR: Here’s the top six news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above that was recorded yesterday afternoon above between and The Kākā’s climate correspondent : An independent review panel into the emergency response to Cyclone Gabrielle in Hawkes Bayconcluded “that ...
There are now only a few days left to give feedback on the Draft Government Policy Statement (GPS) on Land Transport 2024-34 (see our earlier post this week on GPS submission guides). As we’ve reported, the GPS is a disaster for Local Government, so we were particularly interested to hear ...
Willis has pledged to go ahead with the debt-funded tax cuts, despite growing opposition from her own supporters worried about appearing fiscally irresponsible. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for ...
Open access notables A survey of interventions to actively conserve the frozen North, van Wijngaarden et al., Climatic Change:The frozen elements of the high North are thawing as the region warms much faster than the global mean. The dangers of sea level rise due to melting glacier ice, increased ...
Bryce Edwards writes – New Zealand’s biggest-ever political donations scandal is finally at an end. But what is the conclusion? No one can really be sure. The Court of Appeal released its judgement on Tuesday about the Serious Fraud Office case against the NZ First Foundation. On ...
In 2015, then-Prime Minister John Key announced plans for a huge ocean sanctuary around the Kermadec Islands, banning fishing and mining from 15% of Aotearoa's EEZ. It was bold, it was ambitious, and it suggested that National might actually care about the environment. Except they fucked it up: Key failed ...
1. Who has just been given the accolade New Zealander of the Year?a. The Kokakob. The Cook Strait Ferryc. Fair God. Dr Jim Salinger 2. Which of these is an affront to decent society?a. Dame Edna Everageb. Mrs Doubtfire c. Dr. Frank-N-Furterd. Brian 3. Who is Penny Simmonds?a. The aspiring actress in Big ...
New Zealand’s biggest-ever political donations scandal is finally at an end. But what is the conclusion? No one can really be sure.The Court of Appeal released its judgement on Tuesday about the Serious Fraud Office case against the NZ First Foundation. On the face of it, the court found ...
Buzz from the Beehive Waves of rain are set to lash much of the North Island during Easter Weekend as a low-pressure system forms east of New Zealand, according to a weather forecast published in the past day or so. Niwa was warning of a “moisture-laden” long weekend, with rain expected ...
Look around us…Nicola Willis’ promises of balancing the books, of cutting spending without reducing services, and of delivering game changing tax cuts are disappearing before her eyes.Everyday we see stories of violent crime ending in horrific injuries, or worse. The cost of living worsens, whereas the PM claimed renters would ...
TL;DR: My top six news of note on the morning of Thursday, March 28 include:The Government will have to borrow between $10 billion to $15 billion more than previously expected in order to make up for a slowing economy and to pay for $14.9 billion of tax cuts, according to ...
This story by Naveena Sadasivam and Kate Yoder was originally published by Grist and is part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story. The long-awaited jobs board for the American Climate Corps, promised early in the Biden administration, will open next month, according to details shared exclusively ...
Should landlords be able to deduct the interest on the loans they take out to bankroll their property speculation? The US Senate Budget Committee and Bloomberg News don’t think this is a good idea, for reasons set out below. Regardless, our coalition government has been burning through a ton of ...
Treasury’s first report on the economy since the change of government presents a damning indictment of Labour’s economic management. The problem for National is that it is so damning that logically, coupled with a rapidly slowing economy, Finance Minister Nicola Willis should respond to it by postponing or even cancelling ...
Budget tensions are becoming evident within the Coalition Government. Winston Peters made numerous political points in his speech to the NZF annual conference. But the attack on his own government’s fiscal policies raised issues of substance. ‘Today in the Sunday Star Times, journalist and former advisor to the Labour ...
Buzz from the Beehive The media – sure enough – have been binging on Finance Minister Nicola Willis’ release of the Budget Policy Statement and a statement headed Government announces Budget priorities This assures us – or rather, this parrots the Luxon team mantra – that the Budget “will deliver ...
The Ides of March brought me COVID followed by a bereavement. No wonder they tell you to be careful of them.I’m home now and have resumed the interrupted recuperation. Very much looking forward to getting back to regular things. Meanwhile, some thoughts…OneThis new Prime Minister guy just keeps getting more dire. ...
News that the Chinese ATP 40 cyber-hacking unit penetrated parliamentary internet networks in 2021 has renewed concerns about the PRC’s malign intentions in Aotearoa. But is the hack that significant given the length of time that has passed since its … Continue reading → ...
When Parliament passed the Intelligence and security Act in 2017, they assured us all that it was full of safeguards. Any intrusive surveillance of New Zealanders would be subject to a "triple lock", requiring the approval of the Minister and (supposedly independent) Commissioner of Intelligence Warrants, as well as post-facto ...
Eric Crampton writes – Richard Harman’s Politik newsletter provides a bit of the context that ought to have been showing up in other media reports on potential reductions in public service staffing. Media has been reporting on staffing cuts on the order of about 7%. Is that ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – It’s becoming increasingly apparent that many perceive free speech to have become the preserve of the politically right wing, the religiously conservative, the libertarian fringe, the anti-trans, the anti-Māori and…. well, just fill in with whatever groups or individuals you don’t like and don’t ...
Don Brash writes – As everybody who is not blind and deaf is aware, there is a huge political preoccupation with climate change at the moment, a widespread (though by no means unanimous) belief that global temperatures are rising mainly as a result of the greenhouse gases created ...
TL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy on Wednesday, March 27 include:Chris Bishop laid out his vision for filling Aotearoa-NZ’s $100 billion infrastructure deficit in a speech yesterday, emphasising user pays and private funding, but failed to say how to achieve bipartisanship on population, public borrowing and ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Former Finance Minister Grant Robertson and former Prime Minister Chris Hipkins have been conveying how unhappy they are with the tax system. Last week in his valedictory speech, Robertson called for the introduction of a wealth or capital gains tax. And this week Hipkins ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Buzz from the Beehive China has loomed large in Beehive considerations over the past 24 hours, largely because of that country’s mischief-making in the cyber espionage department. Two media statements emerged on that subject hard on the heels of the PM baulking at questions put to him on RNZ’s Morning ...
Chris Trotter writes – WHY IS THE NATIONAL PARTY doing so much for landlords, property developers, trucking, and construction companies, and so little for everybody who isn’t already pretty well-off? It’s as if protecting landlords’ investments and building apartments and roads now constitute the whole of National’s ...
Bryce Edwards writes – When she was campaigning to be Minister of Finance last year, Nicola Willis pledged that she would resign from the job if she failed to deliver tax cuts in her first Budget. Now, it’s that pledge, along with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s ...
Robert MacCulloch writes – The Reserve Bank has doubled staff numbers in five years to 510, with personnel costs rising to $80 million in 2023 from $32 million in 2018 – up by a whopping 150%. I guess when you print $50 billion and flood markets with liquidity, ...
The furore. In case you didn’t notice there was a controversy in the weekend involving dolphins in a little town off the South Island. Don’t panic, they haven’t declared independence and resumed whaling, this was simply a sailing event.The problem began when racing was cancelled on the opening day of ...
For 20 years or more, the case for a meaningful capital tax gains has been mulled over and analysed to death, including by the tax working group chaired by Sir Michael Cullen. More than once, the International Monetary Fund has said a CGT would be a good idea for New ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: The Public Health Communications Centre (PHCC) call for urgent preventive action and a risk assessment survey of long covid in this briefing noteLocal scoop: NZ road deaths surpass OECD rates, so why is the govt reversing safety plans? ...
This story was originally published by Grist and is part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story. This story is part of a collaboration with Grist and WABE to demystify the Georgia Public Service Commission, the small but powerful state-elected board that makes critical decisions about everything from raising ...
This is a guest post from Robert McLachlan Global warming is accelerating; 2023 was off the charts. We need to stop burning fossil fuels. In New Zealand, transport accounts for half of all fossil fuels burnt. In the Emissions Reduction Plan, transport emissions fall 41% by 2035. As the ...
Labour productivity has been receding rapidly over the past two years, reversing a post-lockdown rise. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy as at 6:26am on Tuesday, March 26 include:Workers have been treading water in output per hour worked for 12 years, ...
TL;DR: The key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 2 include:Today, Parliament resumes sitting at 2pm for the second week of a two-week session. Officials for SIS and GCSB report their annual reviews in public to the Intelligence and Security Select Committee from 5.10pm.Tomorrow, ...
Faced with a barrage of criticism over the promised tax cuts from usually supportive commentators, Finance Minister Nicola Willis yesterday reaffirmed her intention to include them in this year’s Budget. The Government is up against it over the cuts just about every way it turns. Commentators like Fran O’Sullivan, Matthew ...
Here’s my pick of today’s substack posts as of 6:26pm on Monday, March 25: writes via his substack that Market-rate housing will make your city cheaper writes via his substack about the problems talking to double-cab ute (truck) drivers about their vehicles. today about moments of radicalisation in ...
Buzz from the Beehive Just before Christmas, Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivered something that was pitched as a mini-budget and brayed about the decisive action being taken to repair the Government books and support income tax relief in Budget 2024. In a statement headed Fiscal repair job underway. she introduced ...
My sister Belinda asked Dad yesterday what one word would describe Mum best. He said: vivacious.If you only knew her from the photos on the slideshow we've made for today,you might wonder about that, because the camera tended to lie with Mum.If ever she saw a camera pointed at her, she ...
There are two major public consultations closing in the next week, Auckland Council’s Long Term Plan (LTP), and the draft Government Policy Statement on Land Transport (GPS). Closing dates and times: LTP closes Thursday 28 February, at 11.59pm – a minute to midnight! GPS closes Tuesday 2 April, at 12pm noon – note that’s ...
From Kiwiblog’s David Farrar – Bryce Wilkinson writes: Senior Fellow Bryce Wilkinson’s analysis reveals that since March 2009, New Zealand has spent $158 billion more overseas than it has earned, but its NIIP has only fallen by $32 billion.Statistics New Zealand shows that receipts from overseas reinsurers have ...
Is she hinting that the Coalition Government will have to back down on key promises it made in Opposition? Brian Easton writes – The Minister of Finance, Nicola Willis, is telling an evolving story about her fiscal challenges. In Opposition she was confident that she could ...
Dear Nicola Willis,Right now you’ve probably got lots of competing demands coming at you. Ministers who’ve inherited quite a mess, or so you’ve told us, looking for money in the budget to improve things. I imagine that’s why they came to parliament - to make things better.You’ll have to make ...
The Local Government, Transport and Auckland Minister hasthreatened councils with intervention if they don’t merge water assets to take them off balance sheet, just as the now-repealed Three Waters plan directed. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things of note this morning for Monday, March 25 include:Simeon ...
A listing of 36 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 17, 2024 thru Sat, March 23, 2024. Story of the week Thanks to John Mason having the stamina to sit down to watch "Climate - the Movie" ...
This morning the Q&A programme had Simeon Brown on to talk about National’s replacement for Three Waters. In case anyone’s forgotten the three are - drinking water, waste water, and sewerage. It’s quite important not to get them mixed up. In much the same way that you wouldn’t want to ...
Today’s newsletter comes with a mini-podcast conversation between me and my buddy Liv Tennet, talking about her time as a child actor in Lord of the Rings. It’s a conversation with a lot of giggles as she talks about falling off a horse, and becoming a meme. Read ...
The Desmog Climate Disinformation Database documents, "individuals and organisations that have helped to delay and distract the public and our elected leaders from taking needed action to reduce greenhouse gas pollution and fight global warming." It's a who's who of the organised climate change denial movement, in other words. In ...
Bob Edlin writes – A High Court judge has decided miscreants who have mana – or who claim to have mana – should be treated differently from miscreants who have none. It’s a ruling that suggests indigenous law-breakers have a better chance of securing a discharge without conviction ...
Welcome to the first, and possibly last, edition of Brickbats, Bouquets and Bull’s Wool. In which I’ll take a look at the events of the last week or so, and rate them.In such ratings the numbers usually have more to do with the opinions of the reviewer, than the actual ...
Roger Partridge writes – My earlier column this month, New Zealand’s highest court could be facing a turning point, prompted a flood of feedback from business readers and lawyers alike. A common query was what Parliament can do to restrain an overreaching judiciary. This week I discuss two steps Parliament ...
TL;DR: In today’s ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.16pm on Friday, March 22: writes about New Zealand's Building Boom—And What the World Must Learn From It over at his substack. challenges the Auckland Council’s use of a 3.8 degrees of warming forecast to oppose a wave-park and data centre project ...
Is she hinting that the Coalition Government will have to back down on key promises it made in Opposition?The Minister of Finance, Nicola Willis, is telling an evolving story about her fiscal challenges. In Opposition she was confident that she could deliver her promised income tax cuts. Appointed minister, she ...
Buzz from the Beehive Ministers of the Crown have drawn attention to one sector of the science sector which is unlikely to be subjected to heavy spending cuts, a state-funded broadcaster which is doing nicely, thank you, and a sporting event that had $5.4 million from the public purse puffed ...
Abbott’s Freestyle Libre sensors allow continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The sensor is applied to the back of the patient’s arm, with a thin filament under the skin measuring glucose levels constantly. But it costs around $100 per sensor and must be replaced once every 14 days. Photo by BSIP/Universal Images ...
The Inspector General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) recently released a report in which he exposes the existence of a foreign intelligence partner-controlled technological “capability” inside the headquarters of the GCSB, NZ’s 5 Eyes-affiliated signals intelligence collection and analysis agency. … Continue reading → ...
Peter Dunne writes – Nearly three decades after the introduction of MMP and multiparty governments there should be a greater level of understanding about their finer points than often appears to be the case. The reaction to the despicable outburst from the Deputy Prime Minister at the weekend highlights ...
The sweet kisses from fruit of summerHave slowly been turning dullerYou say, "those times"And "remember the daysWhen we went outside and there still was the shade?"Taking no reason into play…Autumn. Clear, blue days shortening to longer nights, growing colder. Aotearoa.That’s us. The temperature dropping, the looming car crash - so ...
Bryce Edwards writes – “It is often said that behind every great man is a great woman”. This is the pitch by the National Party Botany electorate branch to attend their “Ladies Afternoon Tea with Amanda Luxon”. For $110 including GST, you can turn up on Saturday 20 April ...
David Farrar writes – The Electoral Commission has published the expense returns for political parties for the 2023 election. I’ve put them in a table with how many votes a party got so we can see the spend per vote. National only spent $3.34 for every vote they got, almost ...
Winston Peters’ headline-making actions over the past week may have been a show of political power intended to strengthen his hand in Budget negotiations. It was no accident that his State of the Nation speech was as it was. He made it as New Zealand First Leader, not as Deputy ...
Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for paying subscribers in the last week included:Former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson bowed out of politics this week, giving a series of exit ...
Graham Adams writes — If you love the law or sausages, as the saying goes, best not to look too closely at how they are made. And after watching the orgy of self-pity when Newshub’s closure was announced on February 28, television journalism should definitely be added to the list of those ...
Venerable New Zealand political commentator, Chris Trotter (https://bowalleyroad.blogspot.com/), is a sad creature these days. Once one of the most reliable Leftist writers out there – Economic Left at that – Trotter seems to have absorbed the worldview of Auckland culture-war obsessives. It is not for me to categorise what he ...
The cruelty of short-term memory loss is that each time you ask where she is, you get the fresh shock and grief of the news. That was Dad's day yesterday.Comfortingly, it seems to be less so today. Last night he looked crumpled, today he seems more settled. There's a card ...
The Coalition Government’s plan to ‘get Auckland moving’ is a cuts cover-up that will ultimately cost Aucklanders more to move around the city, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
Slashing the Ministry of Pacific Peoples by 40% will have a devastating impact on pacific communities and further highlights how little this government cares about anything other than cutting taxes for the wealthiest few. ...
Labour has proposed an urgent inquiry to investigate the ever-increasing profits of supermarkets, aiming to lower costs for shoppers and food producers alike, says Labour Spokesperson for Commerce and Consumer Affairs Arena Williams and Primary Production Spokesperson Cushla Tangaere-Manuel. ...
With 14% of jobs on the line at the Ministry for Ethnic Communities, the responsible Minister Melissa Lee is failing to stand up for the very communities she’s meant to be representing. ...
COURT OF APPEAL: TRIFECTA OF VICTORY FOR NZ FIRST, TRIFECTA OF FAILURE FOR OPPONENTS For the third time since April 2020, New Zealand First has defeated the Serious Fraud Office and all those complicit in a malicious attack against a political party going about its lawful business in a lawful ...
The Green Party stands with people who live in public housing, people in dire housing need, experts and advocates in demanding better than the Government’s archaic approach to housing those who need our support the most. ...
New Zealand has recently lost the hosting rights of some major international sporting events including the America’s Cup, the Rugby Championship, Netball World Cup, and the Wellington Sevens. We are now at a huge risk of losing SailGP as well. And it won’t stop there. The recent issues with SailGP ...
A Member’s Bill drawn this week would modernise insurance law and make things fairer and more transparent for consumers, Christchurch Central MP Duncan Webb said. ...
The Minister for Disability Issues has confirmed she was aware of funding issues in mid-December and did nothing to stop it. On 14 March, she signed off on changes that were announced and implemented on 18 March without any consultation with disability communities. ...
Green Party MP Julie Anne Genter says her members' bill is an opportunity for the coalition government to plug the gap in electric vehicle incentives. ...
The National Government continues to talk about irresponsible tax cuts that will only drive up inflation, despite the country entering a technical recession. ...
The Minister for Disability Issues must act urgently to reinstate flexibility around the funding for disability support and apologise to disabled carers. ...
This story has been initiated by a leftie shill reporter who proactively sought to call a member of a former band, which disbanded twelve years ago, give their biased appraisal of what was said in my speech, and concocted a ham-fisted attempt at a story that does nothing but show ...
The Government has accepted Labour’s change to the Road User Charge (RUC) discount for hybrid vehicles, meaning there will still be some incentive for people to buy greener vehicles. ...
Many in the mainstream media have taken what was said in New Zealand First’s State of the Nation Speech in Palmerston North on Sunday and deliberately, deceitfully, and ignorantly misrepresented what I said and why I said it. The headlines and commentary on the news stated that I compared ‘co-governance ...
Kicking the most vulnerable people out of state housing and pushing them towards homelessness will result in a proliferation of poverty and trauma across our most vulnerable communities. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader and MP for Waiariki, Rawiri Waititi has penned a letter asking MPs to support his members bill to remove GST from all food. The bill is expected to go through its first reading in parliament this Wednesday. “I’m calling on all political parties to support my ...
Good afternoon. Thank you for, in your very busy lives, turning up to this meeting today. On October 14th last year New Zealanders overwhelmingly voted for change. That is exactly what this new government is bringing. New Zealand First campaigned to ‘take back our country’ and stop the disastrous economic ...
This year is about getting real with Kiwis and discussing the tough issues, as the National Government exacerbates inequality and divides New Zealand, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said ...
The Government adding Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) to its already roaring environmental policy bonfire is an assault on the future of wildlife that makes Aotearoa unique. ...
After 12 years of fighting to protect our moana we are finding ourselves back at square one and back at court. Today, the Environmental Protection Agency is sitting in Hawera to reconsider an application from Trans-Tasman Resources to dig up 50 million tonnes of the seabed in South Taranaki. This ...
Minister Shane Jones’ decision to step away from a seabed mining project is evidence of the murky waters surrounding the Government’s fast-track legislation. ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The Coalition Government’s miscalculation saga continues as it has forgotten an eyewatering $90 million gap in its interest deductibility cost figures, say Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds and Revenue Spokesperson Deborah Russell. ...
He Pou a Rangi Climate Change Commission has today released advice that says if the Government doesn’t act now New Zealand is at risk of not meeting its climate goals. ...
The Coalition Government has today confirmed it is abandoning first home buyers who are struggling to get ahead, says Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds. ...
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed the passing of legislation to move light electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) into the road user charges system from 1 April. “It was always intended that EVs and PHEVs would be exempt from road user charges until they reached two ...
New Zealand is strengthening its ability to combat illegal fishing outside its domestic waters and beef up regulation for its own commercial fishers in international waters through a Bill which had its first reading in Parliament today. The Fisheries (International Fishing and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 2023 sets out stronger ...
Economists Carl Hansen and Professor Prasanna Gai have been appointed to the Reserve Bank Monetary Policy Committee, Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced today. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is the independent decision-making body that sets the Official Cash Rate which determines interest rates. Carl Hansen, the executive director of Capital ...
Apartment owners and buyers will soon have greater protections as further changes to the law on unit titles come into effect, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “The Unit Titles (Strengthening Body Corporate Governance and Other Matters) Amendment Act had already introduced some changes in December 2022 and May 2023, and ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters will travel to Egypt and Europe from this weekend. “This travel will focus on a range of New Zealand’s traditional diplomatic and security partnerships while enabling broad engagement on the urgent situation in Gaza,” Mr Peters says. Mr Peters will attend the NATO Foreign ...
Transport Minister Simeon Brown is encouraging all road users to stay safe, plan their journeys ahead of time, and be patient with other drivers while travelling around this Easter long weekend. “Road safety is a responsibility we all share, and with increased traffic on our roads expected this Easter we ...
About 1.4 million New Zealanders will receive cost of living relief through increased government assistance from April 1 909,000 pensioners get a boost to Superannuation, including 5000 veterans 371,000 working-age beneficiaries will get higher payments 45,000 students will see an increase in their allowance Over a quarter of New Zealanders ...
Ensuring social housing is being provided to those with the greatest needs is front of mind as the Government restarts social housing tenancy reviews, Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka says. “Our relentless focus on building a strong economy is to ensure we can deliver better public services such as social ...
The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary will not go ahead, with Cabinet deciding to stop work on the proposed reserve and remove the Bill that would have established it from Parliament’s order paper. “The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary Bill would have created a 620,000 sq km economic no-go zone,” Oceans and Fisheries Minister ...
Dam safety regulations are being amended so that smaller dams won’t be subject to excessive compliance costs, Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on reducing costs and removing unnecessary red tape so we can get the economy back on track. “Dam safety regulations ...
The coalition Government is expanding the medium-scale adverse event classification to parts of the North Island as dry weather conditions persist, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced today. “I have made the decision to expand the medium-scale adverse event classification already in place for parts of the South Island to also cover the ...
The passing of legislation giving effect to coalition Government tax commitments has been welcomed by Finance Minister Nicola Willis. “The Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill will help place New Zealand on a more secure economic footing, improve outcomes for New Zealanders, and make our tax system ...
Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Judith Collins and Tertiary Education and Skills Minister Penny Simmonds today announced plans to transform our science and university sectors to boost the economy. Two advisory groups, chaired by Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, will advise the Government on how these sectors can play a greater ...
The Budget will deliver urgently-needed tax relief to hard-working New Zealanders while putting the government’s finances back on a sustainable track, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The Finance Minister made the comments at the release of the Budget Policy Statement setting out the Government’s Budget objectives. “The coalition Government intends ...
The coalition Government will look at options to address a zoning issue that limits how much financial support Queenstown residents can get for accommodation. Cabinet has agreed on a response to the Petitions Committee, which had recommended the geographic information MSD uses to determine how much accommodation supplement can be ...
Cabinet has agreed to a short extension to the final reporting timeframe for the Royal Commission into Abuse in Care from 28 March 2024 to 26 June 2024, Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden says. “The Royal Commission wrote to me on 16 February 2024, requesting that I consider an ...
The coalition Government is delivering an $18 million boost to New Zealanders needing to travel for specialist health treatment, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says. “These changes are long overdue – the National Travel Assistance (NTA) scheme saw its last increase to mileage and accommodation rates way back in 2009. ...
The Government is recognising the innovative and rising talent in New Zealand’s growing space sector, with the Prime Minister and Space Minister Judith Collins announcing the new Prime Minister’s Prizes for Space today. “New Zealand has a growing reputation as a high-value partner for space missions and research. I am ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed New Zealand’s concerns about cyber activity have been conveyed directly to the Chinese Government. “The Prime Minister and Minister Collins have expressed concerns today about malicious cyber activity, attributed to groups sponsored by the Chinese Government, targeting democratic institutions in both New ...
Independent Reviewers appointed for School Property Inquiry Education Minister Erica Stanford today announced the appointment of three independent reviewers to lead the Ministerial Inquiry into the Ministry of Education’s School Property Function. The Inquiry will be led by former Minister of Foreign Affairs Murray McCully. “There is a clear need ...
State Highway 1 across the Brynderwyns will be open for Easter weekend, with work currently underway to ensure the resilience of this critical route being paused for Easter Weekend to allow holiday makers to travel north, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Today I visited the Brynderwyn Hills construction site, where ...
Introduction Good morning to you all, and thanks for having me bright and early today. I am absolutely delighted to be the Minister for Infrastructure alongside the Minister of Housing and Resource Management Reform. I know the Prime Minister sees the three roles as closely connected and he wants me ...
New Zealand stands with the United Kingdom in its condemnation of People’s Republic of China (PRC) state-backed malicious cyber activity impacting its Electoral Commission and targeting Members of the UK Parliament. “The use of cyber-enabled espionage operations to interfere with democratic institutions and processes anywhere is unacceptable,” Minister Responsible for ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Defence Minister Judith Collins today announced New Zealand will provide logistics support for the upcoming Solomon Islands election. “We’re sending a team of New Zealand Defence Force personnel and two NH90 helicopters to provide logistics support for the election on 17 April, at the request ...
The European Union Free Trade Agreement Legislation Amendment Bill received Royal Assent today, completing the process for New Zealand’s ratification of its free trade agreement with the European Union. “I am pleased to announce that today, in a small ceremony at the Beehive, New Zealand notified the European Union ...
Public consultation on the terms of reference for the Royal Commission into COVID-19 Lessons has concluded, Internal Affairs Minister Hon Brooke van Velden says. “I have been advised that there were over 11,000 submissions made through the Royal Commission’s online consultation portal.” Expanding the scope of the Royal Commission of ...
Hardworking families are set to benefit from a new credit to help them meet their early childcare education (ECE) costs, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. From 1 July, parents and caregivers of young children will be supported to manage the rising cost of living with a partial reimbursement of their ...
A specialised Independent Technical Advisory Group (ITAG) tasked with preparing and publishing independent non-binding advice on the design of a "green" (sustainable finance) taxonomy rulebook is being established, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “Comprising experts and market participants, the ITAG's primary goal is to deliver comprehensive recommendations to the ...
Defence Minister Judith Collins has thanked the Chief of Army, Major General John Boswell, DSD, for his service as he leaves the Army after 40 years. “I would like to thank Major General Boswell for his contribution to the Army and the wider New Zealand Defence Force, undertaking many different ...
25 March 2024 Minister to meet Australian counterparts and Manufacturing Industry Leaders Small Business, Manufacturing, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly will travel to Australia for a series of bi-lateral meetings and manufacturing visits. During the visit, Minister Bayly will meet with his Australian counterparts, Senator Tim Ayres, Ed ...
Government commits almost $3 million for period products in schools The Coalition Government has committed $2.9 million to ensure intermediate and secondary schools continue providing period products to those who need them, Minister of Education Erica Stanford announced today. “This is an issue of dignity and ensuring young women don’t ...
Good morning, it’s great to be here. First, I would like to acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of Building Surveyors and thank you for the opportunity to be here this morning. I would like to use this opportunity to outline the Government’s ambitious plan and what we hope to ...
Minister for Pacific Peoples Dr Shane Reti has announced the Government’s commitment to the Auckland Secondary Schools Māori and Pacific Islands Cultural Festival, more commonly known as Polyfest. “The Ministry for Pacific Peoples is a longtime supporter of Polyfest and, as it celebrates 49 years in 2024, I’m proud to ...
Before moving onto the substance of today’s address, I want to recognise the very significant and ongoing contribution the Breast Cancer Foundation makes to support the lives of New Zealand women and their families living with breast cancer. I very much enjoy working with you. I also want to recognise ...
New Zealand has notched up a first with the launch of University of Canterbury research to the International Space Station, Science, Innovation and Technology and Space Minister Judith Collins says. The hardware, developed by Dr Sarah Kessans, is designed to operate autonomously in orbit, allowing scientists on Earth to study ...
Introduction Thank you for inviting me to speak with you today and I’m sorry I can’t be there in person. Yesterday I started in Wellington for Breakfast TV, spoke to a property conference in Auckland, and finished the day speaking to local government in Christchurch, so it would have been ...
The Coalition Government is contributing more than $1 million to support the establishment of an emergency multi-agency coordination centre in Northland. Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell announced the contribution today during a visit of the Whangārei site where the facility will be constructed. “Northland has faced a number ...
New Zealanders have enjoyed a broader range of voices telling the story of Aotearoa thanks to the creation of Whakaata Māori 20 years ago, says Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka. The minister spoke at a celebration marking the national indigenous media organisation’s 20th anniversary at their studio in Auckland on ...
Commercial catch limits for some fisheries have been increased following a review showing stocks are healthy and abundant, Ocean and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The changes, along with some other catch limit changes and management settings, begin coming into effect from 1 April 2024. "Regular biannual reviews of fish ...
COMMENTARY:By Ronny Kareni Since the atrocious footage of the suffering of an indigenous Papuan man reverberates in the heart of Puncak by the brute force of Indonesia’s army in early February, shocking tactics deployed by those in power to silence critics has been unfolding. Nowhere is this more evident ...
Analysis - Nicola Willis is holding firm on tax cuts despite the economic outlook being worse than forecast and critics urging her to wait, writes Peter Wilson for The Week In Politics. ...
Opposition MPs and unions are criticising a proposal by New Zealand’s Ministry of Pacific Peoples to cut staff by 40 percent. The country’s largest trade union — The Public Service Association — says the ministry has informed staff that it is looking to shed 63 of 156 positions. Opposition MPs ...
A poem by Poetry Aotearoa Yearbook 2024 featured poet Carin Smeaton. Daughtr of the 90s when she gets promoted to usherette a baby blu eel carries her all the way up to mothership she’s hovering high she lets the underaged in to see keanu reeves she lets the only lonely ...
Analysis by Keith Rankin. Keith Rankin, trained as an economic historian, is a retired lecturer in Economics and Statistics. He lives in Auckland, New Zealand. My earlier article – Can ‘Good’ be the Greater Evil? – looked at the issue of how wars should end, and how Good versus Evil ...
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington.AUCKLAND1 AMMA by Saraid de Silva (Moa Press, $38)A stunning debut novel reviewed by Brannavan ...
From Steve Martin to Ricky Stanicky, a pick’n’mix of things worth watching and listening to this long weekend. This is an excerpt from our weekly pop culture newsletter Rec Room. Sign up here. If you’re at a loss for something to occupy yourself with this Easter, don’t panic: The Spinoff’s got ...
Jesus had dinner with his 12 disciples right before he died. Noted historian Madeleine Chapman finds out who really deserved to be there.First published in 2018 but let’s be honest, the subject is timeless. As you sit on your couch this Easter Sunday, eating a chocolate egg you know ...
The newly-promoted Northern League club is on a mission to return to the National League for the first time in two decades. Plenty about domestic football in New Zealand has changed in that time – but the sense that this amateur competition is not an entirely level playing field remains. ...
Comment: Every year on February 2, a dozen men in tuxedos and top hats approach the burrow of a groundhog in Gobbler’s Knob, Pennsylvania and entice the beaver-like rodent to emerge and predict the weather. If the groundhog, named Punxsutawney Phil, sees its own shadow when it is summoned, legend ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 29 March appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Auckland Council has put a deadline on new weather-impacted property owners applying for categorisation as government funding looks set to run out. Councillors have voted to support a deadline of September 30 for property owners who haven’t accessed support to come forward and engage with the council’s recovery office. It ...
NONFICTION 1 BBQ Economics by Liam Dann (Penguin Random House, $40) “It’s official,” wrote Dann nine days ago in the Herald, where he works as business editor at large, “we’re in recession.” Yeah, great. He delivered the bad stats: “GDP fell 0.1 percent in the December 2023 quarter, compared with ...
By Anneke Smith, RNZ News political reporter A petition urging the New Zealand government to provide urgent humanitarian assistance to the Palestinian people has been tabled in the House. More than 200 people gathered on Parliament’s forecourt today and they were met by MPs from Labour, the Greens and Te ...
Pacific Media Watch The Paris-based global media freedom watchdog RSF (Reporters Without Borders) has appealed for information about the “disappearance” of Palestinian journalist Bayan Abusultan. She was reportedly last seen on March 19 among people “sequestered” in this week’s raid and siege of Al Shifa hospital by Israeli troops in ...
EDITORIAL:The Jakarta Post It happens again and again; indigenous Papuans fall victim to Indonesian soldiers. This time, we have photographic evidence for the brutality, with videos on social media showing a Papuan man being tortured by a group of plainclothes men alleged to be the Indonesian Military (TNI) members. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robyn J. Whitaker, Director of the Wesley Centre for Theology, Ethics, and Public Policy & Associate Professor, New Testament, Pilgrim Theological College, University of Divinity A strange and eclectic range of activities takes place across these few weeks of the year. Some ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Panizza Allmark, Professor Visual & Cultural Studies, Edith Cowan University It’s Easter weekend, which means many of us will be kicking back with the greatest hits on repeat. But whether you’re a boomer, or an ‘80s or ’90s kid, you might be ...
RNZ Pacific Fiji’s Acting Public Prosecutor has filed an appeal against the sentences of former prime minister Voreqe Bainimarama and suspended police chief Sitiveni Qiliho in their corruption case. Bainimarama was granted an absolute discharge for attempting to pervert the course of justice while Qiliho received a conditional discharge with ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Arosha Weerakoon, Senior Lecturer and General Dentist, School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland Casezy idea/Shutterstock How does toothpaste work? What did people use before toothpaste was invented? – Amelia, age 7, Meanjin (Brisbane) Thanks for your ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Brett Hallam, Associate professor, UNSW Sydney IM Imagery/Shutterstock Solar SunShot is well named. The Australian government announced today it would plough A$1 billion into bringing back solar manufacturing to Australia, boosting energy security, swapping coal and gas jobs for those ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Clare Dix, Research Fellow in Nutrition & Dietetics, The University of Queensland Easter is the time for chocolate. The shops are full of fantastically packaged and shiny chocolates in all shapes and sizes, making trips to the supermarket with children more challenging ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emma Felton, Adjunct Senior Researcher, University of South Australia Even in a stubborn cost-of-living crisis, it seems there’s one luxury most Australians won’t sacrifice – their daily cup of coffee. Coffee sales have largely remained stable, even as financial pressures have ...
Mining company Trans-Tasman Resources has unexpectedly withdrawn its application for a consent to suck the valuable metals vanadium and titanium from the Taranaki seafloor, as it apparently wagers on the Government’s new fast-track process. It had spent two-and-a-half days putting its case to the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision-making committee, at ...
Contrary to the Associate Minister of Education’s claims, analysis of Healthy School Lunches Programme - Ka Ora, Ka Ako assessments has revealed it provides excellent value for the taxpayer dollar, as a groundswell of public opposition to Government ...
Greenpeace says wannabe Taranaki seabed miner Trans-Tasman Resources is likely banking on Christopher Luxon’s fast-track process to side-step proper scrutiny of its Taranaki seabed mining proposal by bailing out of the Environmental Protection Agency hearing ...
Kiwis Against Seabed mining today slammed Australian owned would-be seabed miner Trans Tasman Resources (TTR) for abandoning its application to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to mine the seabed of the South Taranaki Bight. The company ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Katie Attwell, Associate Professor, School of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia Ground Picture/Shutterstock Months after COVID vaccines were introduced in 2021, governments and private organisations mandated them for various groups. Health and aged care workers were among the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Dzurak, Scientia Professor Andrew Dzurak, CEO and Founder of Diraq, UNSW Sydney Diraq For decades, the pursuit of quantum computing has struggled with the need for extremely low temperatures, mere fractions of a degree above absolute zero (0 Kelvin or ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne A national Essential poll, conducted March 20–24 from a sample of 1,150, gave the Coalition a 50–44 lead including undecided, a reversal ...
The Taxpayers’ Union has today made a formal request under the Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Open Government Information () for information held about how New Zealand Members of Parliament are spending taxpayer ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robert Nelson, Honorary Principal Fellow, The University of Melbourne A Byzantine depiction of the Eucharist in Saint Sophia Cathedral, Kyiv.Jacek555/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA A nasty quarrel arose in the 11th century over what kind of bread should be used in holy ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Patrick Hesp, Professor, Flinders University Patrick Hesp In some parts of Australia, coastal dunes are retreating from the ocean at an alarming rate, as waves carve up the beach and wind blows the sand inland. But coastal communities are largely ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Luke Heemsbergen, Senior Lecturer, Digital, Political, Media, Deakin University With an impressive 60% of the US smartphone market, Apple is undeniably big, but not a clear monopoly. Yet, years of innovation by Apple have effectively given the company its own exclusive ...
Whether you’re facing layoffs or are just an emotional junior staffer, it’s always a good idea to scout out a good crying place before you need it. It’s an incredibly hard time for Wellington. Across the city, thousands of public servants are hearing tough news about redundancies and layoffs. Government ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James Miller-Jones, Professor, Curtin University Nuclear explosions on a neutron star feed its jets. Danielle Futselaar and Nathalie Degenaar, Anton Pannekoek Institute, University of Amsterdam, CC BY-SA How fast can a neutron star drive powerful jets into space? The answer, it ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Daryl Adair, Associate Professor of Sport Management, University of Technology Sydney Earlier this week, independent MP Andrew Wilkie accused the AFL of conducting “off the books” illicit drug testing to identify players using substances of abuse, then inappropriately withdrawing them from matches ...
The Government’s announcement that it will scrap plans for a vast marine sanctuary around the Kermadec Islands is ‘shameful’ and will make it impossible for Aotearoa New Zealand to meet its international commitments, says the World Wide Fund for Nature ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Quiggin, Professor, School of Economics, The University of Queensland Shutterstock The federal government has bowed to pressure from the car industry, announcing it will relax proposed emissions rules for utes and vans and delay enforcement of the new standards ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Suzanne Rutland, Professor Emerita, University of Sydney In his latest book, Jewish Life in Medieval Spain, Jonathan Ray focuses on the tumult of the 14th century in Spain – a time of the plague, civil strife and war between the two largest ...
While creating a slate of world-class shows, Whakaata Māori also developed a generation of world-class creatives. Television is an odd word. It mixes the Ancient Greek and Latin languages, and its most literal meaning is “far-off sight”. In the contemporary and living language of te reo Māori, “whakaata” as a ...
Yesterday the UN Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Israel’s war on Gaza. This significant step and the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza prompted an urgent debate in the New Zealand Parliament. Leader ...
The Government’s decision to reduce access to continuous glucose monitors (CGM) not only threatens the lives of children with type 1 diabetes and increases the potential for ‘Dead in Bed’ syndrome, but also threatens the health of their parents an ...
Apples are available year-round, but the wide variety on offer involves intensive scientific research – and large-scale commercialisation. What’s beautiful, red, sweet and crunchy? Tony Martin’s favourite kind of apple: Sassy. The CEO of apple and pear breeding organisation Prevar, Martin’s fondness for Sassy represents professional success as well as ...
Family violence specialist service Shine is calling on employers to stop asking for proof of domestic violence in order for employees to access domestic violence leave. The call comes five years after the introduction of the Domestic Violence ...
The Deputy Chairperson of the Finance and Expenditure Committee is calling for public submissions on the Budget Policy Statement 2024. The Budget Policy Statement 2024 (BPS) sets out the Government's priorities for the 2024 Budget. It explains the approach ...
Brutal government spending cuts that will see the size of the Ministry for Pacific Peoples slashed by 40% will hit Pasifika communities hard, the PSA says. The Ministry has told staff that it is seeking voluntary redundancies, and to redeploy and reassign ...
I live with five people I mostly love, but our different ideas about generosity are starting to really irk me.Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nzDear Hera,This is a bit of a random one but here goes. I’m 22 and work an OK job (OK meaning I get paid ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Maria Nicholas, Senior Lecturer in Language and Literacy Education, Deakin University Earlier this month, the New South Wales government announced it would roll out programs for gifted students in every public school in the state. This comes amid concerns gifted school ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christopher Rudge, Law lecturer, University of Sydney Massachusetts General Hospital In a world first, we heard last week that US surgeons had transplanted a kidney from a gene-edited pig into a living human. News reports said the procedure was a ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Tombs, Howard Paterson Chair of Theology and Public Issues, University of Otago The 5th-century Maskell panel showing Jesus in a loincloth.British Museum, CC BY-NC-SA When Jesus is shown on the cross, he is almost always depicted wearing a loincloth around ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Panizza Allmark, Professor Visual & Cultural Studies, Edith Cowan University Shutterstock When you think about a red object, you might picture a red carpet, or the massive ruby in the Queen’s crown. Indeed, Western monarchies and marketing from brands such ...
COMMENTARY:Jewish Voice for Peace The UN Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza on Monday — and for the first time since the beginning of the Israeli military’s genocide of Palestinians, the United States abstained rather than vetoing it. Security Council resolutions are legally binding, ...
Asia Pacific Report A New Zealand investigative journalist and author says the US spy system hosted by the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) appears to be a controversial intelligence system used in global capture-kill operations. Writing a commentary for RNZ News today, Nicky Hager, author of Secret Power, a 1996 ...
While Nicola Willis wouldn’t give any details on its size, she said a package of tax cuts is definitely still coming in this year’s budget, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. ...
The Taxpayers’ Union is welcoming the investigation into the Department of Internal Affairs after it was revealed that the Department’s Chief Executive personally reached out to expedite a DJs passport application. Taxpayers’ Union Campaigns ...
Finance minister Nicola Willis delivers her first budget statement, and unwittingly helps Joel MacManus save his relationship. Nicola Willis strode into the Beehive Theatrette. Around me, on the green foldout seats, were the country’s top business and political journalists. They were all here to see her announce the Budget Policy ...
Twenty years ago today, Māori Television launched after much controversy. Jamie Tahana looks back on its survival and impact across two decades. Chad Chambers stepped onto the stage, the brim of his cap casting a shadow across his face. His smile beamed as bright as his white freezing works gumboots, ...
Tauranga, Rotorua, Wellsford, Onehunga, Westhaven marina – Gavin Strawhan walks the meanish streets of New Zealand in his entertaining debut novel The Call, almost sure to roar into the number 1 position on the Nielsen bestseller chart, its front cover bearing a rave from somebody: “A really good and genuinely ...
On a Thursday in February, at Wellington’s Conservation House, the Conservation Authority, a statutory body advising the eponymous department and minister, Tama Potaka, opened its 195th meeting. Under consideration that afternoon was an agenda item written by Tim Bamford, chief advisor in the Department of Conservation’s biodiversity, heritage and visitors ...
The Karam defamation case should be a warning to bloggers and other forum hosts, and anyone who uses social media who thinks they can make unprovable and potentially defamatory comments with impunity.
From Karam awarded $535,000 over defamation:
People commenting anonymously may think they are immune from defamation but that could be put to the test legally.
And bloggers who allow open slather comments should note that Fairfax NZ has been also held responsible in this case and have settled privately. I frequently see potentially defamatory comments made on a number of blogs.
Most people being attacked online don’t take defamation action and the attackers probably think they are safe from being held to account.
Parker and Purkiss probably thought they were untouchable and could make unsubstantiated claims with impunity. They may have thought they could exploit the power of free speech.
They may have believed their own hype and thought that believing something was sufficient justification for attacking someone’s integrity. This seems have continued “in choosing to use the defence of truth at the trial”.
Perhaps hose who think they are safe attacking and defaming online should have a good look at this case.
[karol: I don’t know why you chose to make this warning on The Standard, Pete. But The Standard Policy is very strong on not allowing comments that are a legal risk. Also, anonymous comments are not allowed.]
Hey George, are you trying to warn off those people who are questioning the ethics of Peter Dunne, Minister for Legal Highs, not disclosing that the person paid for advocating on behalf of the scum who run the Legal High business is his pride and joy, my son James?
Are you?
I came to post on the finding and found pete had already. what was my ulterior motive?
I am no apologist for pete but the pouncing has become more volumous and less specific to any relevant point recently?
Agreed Tracey the blogs getting more and more like an old boys club to beat up on anyone that they don’t agree with.
Pathetic really.
Actually i thought the comments were beginning to resemble commenters on WO and kiwiblog.
I dont agree with many things Pete posts but apart from ownering twice if he was being stupid or naive, I have tried not to stoop.
I do want to point out tinfoilhat that it is not just left commenters either. Srylands repeatedly accuses me of being drunk and others on the right get very abusive.
Yes I agree that there are many on the right that are just as bad.
And I’ve been guilty of some bad behaviour myself, i think we’d all be much better behaved towards each other if we met face to face rather than on the internet which does tend to lend itself to bullying and other bad behaviour at times.
This particular issue was particularly pertinent to Kiwiblog because there were extensive Bain /Karam discussions there with a lot of abuse and accusations and probably defamation. That’s why I posted there first and again on today’s General Debate. No reactionary abuse there and there’s been some sensible discussion on it.
After the usual few have calmed down addressing the issue rather than attacking the messenger seems to be taking over here. It’s an important issue for all who comment in social media.
One comment on KB from Nostalgia:
So what Pete?
On this board the history is different. Over here the history is of you clogging up threads with passive aggressive bullshit, and of you making weird arguments about what oppositions ought to able to talk about.
Yes, PG does have a habit of talking baloney and leading a discussion around in circles but that’s not a good enough excuse to attack someone without reading what they’re saying first. In this case it was a reasonable point.
The irony there Tracey is that PG commented on the wrong blog. As Karol pointed out, ts authors are already aware of what the legal situation is, and have been very clear on that. If PG wasn’t implying that this case has implications for ts, then he needs to learn how to communicate better.
i suspect he hasnt read the ploicy carefully or reaquainted himself with it. something many here are probably guilty of.
i am working on some stuff and not ignoring your other questions.
I doubt there is a single commenter here who has had the policy explained to him more often than Pete, often in great detail and with enormous patience.
He really has no excuse.
this is my point about his new role. he doesnt seem to read the right stuff before posting, like the actual court decision.
It’s the passive-aggressive thing that Pete does, Tracey. The cumulative body of work.
I’m quite sure that if you had commented first on this we would have had, when taken in the context of your previous comments, and also as a comment that stands alone a reasoned comment that doesn’t put in the judgments that Pete does.
+1 miravox.
Let’s not pretend that this is anything other than the fact that PG creates a whole bunch of distruption, and then decides that he has a right to continue doing so. And then he plays disingenuous.
It’s obvious here that I didn’t ‘create’ any disruption, rather there’s a few very familiar pseudonyms who chose to disrupt something that should be of interest to anyone using social media.
Typical ignore the issue and attack the messenger. It’s something that’s obviously supported here. And then trying to blame me for it is a common part of the game.
That’s right, it’s everyone else’s fault, nothing to do with your ongoing and historical behaviour.
Remind me again why you got banned last time, and what you were doing leading up to that ban?
Check it out. I was suggesting that some of the behaviour here was not a good look, and I was being attacked and abused for doing that. Same old.
Ah, now Pete the Martyr.
But nothing actually goes into defamation because the owners/moderators look for and remove that type of shit. It was well worth posting but now you’re getting into your usual BS.
Now now, pete was only warning folks here of an issue that they were already aware of. He’s a very helpful chap that way.
when did you post your commentary at whaleoil… the publisher there isprobably pretty susceptible
weka
Absolutely.
I’m not using a pseudonym, Pete, and I’m happy to agree with others that your contributions at The Standard are frequently disruptive and come across as very disingenuous. This is a case in point – you’ve high-handedly warned “[t]hose who think they are safe attacking and defaming online” when you have a lot of history of making rather nasty insinuations about others. This is an example:
http://yournz.org/2014/03/03/mathers-story-seems-odd/
Of course, everything you write is carefully vague, or couched as questions. So you ‘get away’ with basically stating in that post that the entire story about Mojo Mathers’ trip to Masterton was deliberately leaked by the Greens to the Herald in order to ‘sting’ the Taxpayers’ Union and smear the government. The whole conspiracy’s laid out there, including your snide comments about Green supporters expressing their contempt for the TU on Twitter.
It’s just as vicious and personal as anything which I’ve ever seen posted at The Standard, but as far as I can tell you think it doesn’t count as long as you can wring your hands and pretend to be distressed by the muckiness of politics.
“And then he plays disingenuous.”
You’re right – his pattern of commenting shows he’s just a stirrer, and he plays until he gets caught out not having researched the thing he’s talking about, has his own previous comments with a 180 deg different ‘opinion’ quoted back at him, or is proven comprehensively wrong. Then he just refuses to engage at all.
I understand Tracey’s frustration with people who are sick of PG, but jeez – any look back at his commenting will show he does have a pattern of passive aggressive pontificating and then running.
You know what he really doesn’t like? Following through to the logical conclusion of his statements.
It’s frequently awful and he has pretty much never thought it through himself.
I don’t think you would have couched your comment in such a way as to start a flame war, Tracey.
Once Fairfax settled it was obvious where the case was going. The remaining defendants were mad to continue it; I suspect a retraction and apology even at that late stage might have brought out some of Mr. Karam’s undoubted generosity.
agreed. Karam said exactly that. A retraction and apology in 2009 would have been enough.
What we do know George is no-one will be attacking your integrity round here right???,
That’s because of despite there being an exhaustive and ongoing search by everyone here we have yet to find it…
As greywarbler pointed out yesterday. It’s often better not to rise to the provocation, and feed the tit for tats.
But we are all anonymous aren’t we karol.
Aren’t we?
oh, except PG Tips and a few other loons
anonymity shouldnt be a shield from unlawful behaviour, which includes defaming people.
of course, just checking on whether the standard thinks we are anonymous or not …
Pseudonymous. It doesn’t think 😉
an anonymous pseudonymite perhaps?
“anonymous pseudonymite” sounds like something banned in Leviticus
snap 😆
understood
“anonymity shouldnt be a shield from unlawful behaviour, which includes defaming people.”
And it’s not. Pete’s comment is ridiculous in its suggestion. Commenting has nothing to do with it. It’s who does the publishing that is at issue.
karol
am appreciating your thoughtful comments on this thread, and responses within pete’s and other’s own posts.
and if a blogger or commenter defames someone who can afford to sue them. this is an important aspect pete cos bringing defamation proceedings is very expensive and most awards are below 50k.
Have you posted this on WhaleOil and KiwiBlog as well? Haven’t got time to look myself.
At Kiwiblog over an hour before here:
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2014/04/general_debate_16_april_2014.html/comment-page-1#comment-1307574
Some comments there already that recognise the potential implications. And I’ll post again there in today’s General debate (it doesn’t start until 8 am).
Also (attracting immediate interest): http://yournz.org/2014/04/17/karam-defamation-case-a-warning-to-blogs/
Odd but perhaps not surprising that some here have taken this as a threat or somehow attacking The Standard. I think anyone commenting online should be aware of the risks.
It’s cowardly to make veiled threats and then deny them.
Cowardly but not at all surprising.
You would know.
Yep I’ve dealt with bullies before. Passive-aggressive dishonest cowardly ones like you are the worst.
Very funny Mr Brave.
🙄
Interesting responses to felix, he is one person who on at least two suggested people give you a chance at politicheck and has often taking people to task for suggesting someone else, anyone else, shouldn’t post here.
IMO Felix is one of the worst offenders at this site Tracey, just because he says he’s of the left doesn’t mean his bullying and defamation shouldn’t be called out.
wasn’t saying he should be immune to anything. show me where I said he ought to be? no one is immune from responses to their comments. Just cos you are on the right doesn’t mean you only have to comment on the behaviour of those on the left here. Yet you do so discriminate.
*shrug
Maybe you don’t know Pete like I know Pete.
You think you know or you say you know?
I’m not aware we’ve ever met. You’ve made claims that I think are a way off the mark. Either you don’t know me very well or you deliberately make shit up.
Another irony is passive aggressive accusations. Yes Tracey, I agree, there’s different felixes.
Not sure why you think i’m on the right Tracey unless you take the rather odd view of DtB that he Green party is centre right. 🙂
mickey accused me of leading a green attack on cunliffe yesterday. its all through the looking glass these past few days on here. I apologise for calling you as one on the right.
Couldnt agree more Tinfoilhat Felix is just an abusive ranting idiot, he may have said he would give Pete a chance but everytime Pete posts you can guarantee Felix is right behind with his crap along with that idiot OAB never any facts or reasoned and balanced arguements just swearing and throwing their toys out of the cot, it disruptive and boring for those that dont comment often but read often
“You think you know or you say you know?
I’m not aware we’ve ever met. “
You’re really not much good at interpreting teh english, Pete. Bit concerning, considering you’re the Factmaster General.
I’ve never said that the Green Party is centre right. I’ve said that about the Labour Party.
@ Mainlander “Couldn’t agree more Tinfoilhat Felix is just an abusive ranting idiot.”
Brighter, more enlightened and more compelling than you’ll ever be, my thoroughly pointless Tory chum.
If you think there are different felixes, Pete, why not just say so?
Instead you pretend Tracey said it. Why?
I don’t know how you got
” I agree, there’s different felixes.” from my comment that “he is one person who on at least two suggested people give you a chance at politicheck and has often taking people to task for suggesting someone else, anyone else, shouldn’t post here”
whaleoil commenters are probably most in need of the warning Pete.
So not on WhaleOil?
Probably the worst offending blog there is.
Has been one of the worst there but seems to have toned down, they’ve made an effort to do that. Wanting to be seen as a more serious site.
It was mentioned briefly there this morning there but wasn’t picked up on. I wanted to see if there was a post on it, they cover a of of relevant things but haven’t been pro-Karam what is not said and posted on can say as quite a bit sometimes. There’s plenty of time yet. You could do it if you wanted to see it there.
It doesn’t seem to have been mentioned at The Daily Blog either, it’s a lottery whether comments are allowed through there. Nor on other blogs. It would have been mentioned at Kiwiblog and here regardless of what I did. More general topics covered at the two more moderate political blogs.
Pete George can fuck off and take his veiled threats with him.
Pretty much this ^^
Pretty much this also
The truth is an absolute defence against libel, Petty George, you bland, banal, biased, passive-aggressive incompetent dishonest waste of oxygen.
Anyone employing you as a fact checker needs their head examined. Your continued employment in the role can only lead to the ridicule and contempt that attaches to you rubbing off on your employer and co-workers.
[karol: the “truth” still needs to be tested in court. The moderators here are very strong on not allowing potentially defamatory comments, where there is no public evidecne available as to whether the accusations are true or not. I’d suggest commenters don’t leep rising to the provocation – it leads to a flame war that, among other things, gets boring for other readers.]
Karol, I think this is something all blogs and participants in social media should be aware of. I know what The Standard policies are.
[karol: your intitial comment did come across as a veiled attack on posters and commenters on The Standard. The anonymity of bloggers had nothing at all to do with the Karam case you cited. It was a provocative statement to post here as starkly as you did. It’s bound to wind people up.]
…I think…
[citation needed]
I know what The Standard policies are … after being banned for breaching them. Fact.
“did come across as a veiled attack”
There’s commenters here who take all sorts of things as ‘veiled attacks’. Most of that is imagined or invented, often that seems to be an excuse for them to attack.
Irony abounds.
[karol: The TS policy states clearly that anonymity and legal risks are not allowed. Your comment pontificated as if people here did not know that. I jumped on it quickly hoping to prevent the predictable retaliations and flame war.]
@Karol, and one could hardly blame you.
I’ll confine myself to rolleyes from here on in.
OAB, how do we produce them again, my short term memory loss seems to have become permanent…
Put a colon at either end of “roll” 🙂
,roll, Tah OAB,(doesn’t want to work for me tho)..
colon not comma bad 😉
:rolleyes:
🙄
:rolleyes:
It ain’t working for me.
Anyway, I would roll my eyes if I could. We’ve gone from Mornings with Phil to Mornings with Pete!
lets try again………..
🙄
?
Lolz Rosie, i am just about ready to join the ‘bring back Phill campaign’…
Lolz Tracey, i ‘think’ i tried colon first but here goes again, ‘rolleyes’ ‘roll’ … :rolleyes:
Just the word “roll” with a colon at each end. You can do it! 😀
Edit: follow the link in my comment above for the whole list 😉
🙄 one last try…YES, i feel like a computer genius, Google this morning is definitely my friend,
Its roll with : befor the roll and : after the roll,(with no spacing)…
Yay!
Lolz OAB, my tech ‘savvy-ness’ has just increased this morning by 100%, my self taught computer use has the odd small gap in the teaching side of things…
took me 3 edits to get mine right!
Don’t fret Pete, as long as you don’t make demands on our politicians whether Left or Right to do something about climate change.
I don’t recall any Right Winger being called a Goebbels by the lprent for demanding that climate change become an election issue so you should be alright.
anyone who wants to read the decision, it is here.
https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/pdf/jdo/58/alfresco/service/api/node/content/workspace/SpacesStore/d2156730-d467-4a54-b8fe-b5d95dce9e3e/d2156730-d467-4a54-b8fe-b5d95dce9e3e.pdf
Am very interested in defamation myself and am considering taking an action. However the expected award is probably 10,000 to 30,000, with only scaled costs (about a third of the costs of a decent lawyer). So, like many who believe they have been defamed and their business and reputation hurt, I am in a position where taking the action will cost me, and I don’t have the money.
I am glad that karam stood up but I know he could afford to. us ordinary folks sometimes have to accept the appalling malice of others,a nd the damage it causes… until they do it to someone who can fight back.
And that really is why we need to have better legal aid.
I understand the need to weed out the vexacious litigants. Ms P Bright and many of her group would come into this category. BUT having a panel or a single judge (not able to hear the actual case) read the initial pracey, view supporting evidence, and decide if a prima facie case exists would be a start.
However, if you have a home and any equity, that’s where the attachment order comes in. When you sell your house, the LA group/crown get their money back.
PG: “Perhaps hose who think they are safe attacking and defaming online should have a good look at this case.””
A timely warning for the likes of WhaleOil and Kiwiblog who overindulge in such practices.
Yes, as has been pointed out this morning at Kiwiblog:
Here’s a PDF of the judgement.
when did you read the judgment?
lol – nice one Tracey
its just that having read it i was going to post the link in my post here. i was surprised pete hadnt.
It was a great comment because it encapsulated the issue i have with pete – his sanctimonious, holier than thou persona is not backed up with reality – I find that irritating.
I’m glad you read it – I may, although i’m not worried personally as I’m usually nice to people 🙂 at least to people i think might not be able to take it. Kia kaha.
I hear you marty.
I read it cos I have a legal background and at the moment a genuine personal interest in defamation law. I don’t expect most people to wade through a 60+ page judgment.
your kia kaha and plus 1.
Nothing to see here folks,there’s been the odd comment recently about the corrupting influence big Pharma could have on our medical ‘profession’ with news that staff employed by the DHB’s had reported $170,000 worth of ‘gifts from the drug manufacturers in a year,
Buried in the ‘Economics’ pages of today’s Herald Online version is a little story which states that one of these giant companies,(incidently the worlds biggest enabler of the manufacture of the drug P with its factory in China cranking 24/7 pumping out the main precursor substance used in the manufacture of the illegal drug), GlaxoSmithKline is under investigation in a number of countries for you guessed it ‘Corruption’,
China, Poland, Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon are all apparently investigating the drug maker and in Poland the company is being investigated for allegedly ‘bribing’ doctors to prescribe the companies drugs,
There is no corruption in New Zealand tho right???, or is that simply because we refuse to look with private medical practice having no legal requirement to report all ‘gifts’ it receives from the drug manufacturers…
they will settle it so as to avoid being found guilty of anything….
While the mud flies at Key and Collins concerning the Oravida dinner, etc, I received a note from a friend in China which puts an important perspective:
‘ I’m aware there has been a lot of publicity about the trade with China, especially in the areas of dairy and meat products. One thing that could investigated a bit closer is: who owns the dairy and cattle farms who are sending so much produce to China? I think you will find they are owned by Chinese business-people. Also, at least one of the largest meat-works in NZ is owned by Chinese interests. So – the trade figures look good but where are the profits going? Don’t get me wrong – this is not anti-Chinese. We love the people here. Voters need to be made aware of the full picture, though. Why does NZ allow the sale of key assets? Australia doesn’t allow it; nor do many of our other major trading partners. When Key visited China and made such a big fuss about the show put on for him, he clearly lacked any knowledge of Chinese culture. What the Chinese Government was saying was: this is what we can do for you; what are you going to do for us? Being described as a good friend of China should also raise some concerns. In business here, if you are a good friend, you are expected to lower your price to the extent you are barely making a profit. I don’t think Key understands the cost of being a good friend. “
key only cares that they made HIM feel special.
He’s going to get a bit of a shock next year when the invitations are no longer forthcoming and he figures out that it was “THE PM OF NZ” that played golf with the President, and had tea with the Queen, and sang the national anthem with the All Blacks.
Plus 1
Interesting observation by your friend there Dan1.
Look at this looney …. all wired and dataed up to 700 gadgets …..
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/9950896/Personal-informatics-trends-tracked
what a laugh that is
gotta happen though that, like using lippie makes your lips stop producing their own lip protection, he will lose the ability to assess his environment, completely contrary to his stated aim.
foolish methinks, foolish
Pete George is a Troll who us threatening Standinastas. He is doing the dirty work of Legal High drug pushers, Chen Palmer and the Dunnes, Pere et fils.
Ban him, after telling him to go fuck himself.
”My Daddy was a bank robber but He never hurt no-body”, the tables appear to have turned, in what appears to be a ‘bank robbery’ the Reserve Bank recently raised the Official Cash Rate which in turn had the Trading Banks cranking up their interest rates,
Basing it’s decision on the ‘expected’ rate of inflation the Reserve Bank is said to be again raising the OCR in April and again in June/July, with every .25 rise in the Official Rate translating to an extra 20 bucks on interest paid for every $100,000 of debt,
Spurred on by the cheer-leading Trading Banks in what looks like a major exercise in profit gouging the Reserve Bank is said to be expected to raise the OCR again despite inflation being lower than expectations for the year coming in at an annual rate of 1.5%,
Given that the ‘expectation’,(from the Trading Banks),is that the rises in the OCR in April and June/July will again be .25 basis points each time this will result in an increase in interest payments weekly of $60 a week for every $100,000 of debt owed in the first 6 months of this year alone by individuals and business effectively kneecapping an economy nowhere near the 3% of inflation where the Reserve Bank could be expected to act,
Consumer information from the Consumer Price Index shows across the board from big ticket items, to clothing and food, prices are stable or falling, the exceptions being the 2.9% rise in retail electricity costs(again), and, a 10% rise in Government Taxation of tobacco products,(which makes all those lives ‘saved’,(snigger),by the upward trajectory in tobacco taxation,(when you consider the role this taxation has in inflation and the Reserve Bank’s response to this), an extremely costly exercise for everyone with an iota of debt,
The only winners in this little equation of raising interest rates off of the back of incorrect data, the Trading Banks who get a ‘free’ jump in profits and the Reserve Bank Governor’s ego who gets to be the ‘enabler’ of the trading banks ‘profit gouge’ and kill off any growth in the economy befor it occurs…
slylands will be along presently to tell you that you are
a. wrong
b. paying extra is a good thing, or the fault of those who bought houses
c. it’s not as bad as 2008 (which English banged on about yesterday to blame Labour and ignore the GFC and gouging financial institutions)
he may or may not discuss how landlords with mortgages will raise rentals.
last month the cost of poultry, meat, fruit and vegetables rose.
Ah it all depends on how and what you eat Tracey, poultry and meat are off my menu, as is butter and cheese,
i can get 3 meals out of a $7 Wharehou fillet, and,buying the fruit and vege at the weekend market has allowed me an extra ten(at least)in my pocket at the end of the week while the volume of fruit and vege has risen by at least 50%…
seafood not caught yourself in auckland… simple fish is v expensive. im glad you are finding ways. milk and cheese and nuts and bread went down.
before christmas coke was being sold at countdown . 8 1.5 ltr for $15. crazy shit
Depends how you look at fish Tracey, ,my $7 fillet turned into two hunks big enough to make two separate meals,(in tinfoil steamed in the juices along with a bed of finely chopped onion and a cap of sliced tomato, an optional squeeze of lemon juice or a dab of honey right in the middle of it to get the mind singing),
Plus a decent enough amount left for a bowl of raw fish saturated with lemon juice which along with the onions and tomatoes soaking in the coconut cream is a good meal,(tonight’s tea),
i can understand the ‘meat-eaters’ comparison tho, i used to ‘judge’ the price of fish against how much fish i could buy measured against how much beef or pork i could get for the same amount of coin,
Sure by volume you get more Pork and Beef for the bucks, but then, the ‘jam tart’ gets a load more bad fats for the sake of being economical…
Mmm, sounds delish.
If you can get a good price on shallots, I find they work better with fish than onions due the milder, almost sweet flavour.
That’s it, I’m going to stop at the fish markets on my way home tonight.
I do something similar, soy sauce, cubed hard tofu, chopped onions, finely chopped sweet peppers – leave to marinate for at least 30 mins.
Get a baking dish and place a couple of fish fillets (where the flesh will still hold together), tip the marinade on top of it, spinkle a few breadcrumbs and bake.
Serve with whatever seasonal veges you have on hand.
or grow chives
Hmm, chives have a much sharper flavour than shalotts.
I am lucky enough to have handed down from my grandmother a variety of multiplying leeks that are in size, somewhere between chives and spring onions, and are stronger in flavour than chives.
Fantastic for all sort of dishes, though I find them just a little too strong for scrambled eggs so I tend to go with parsley or garlic chives.
use fewer of them 😉
joking aside my chives last for month sand months and nothing seems to kill them… take up less space than shallots too
Ode to Money (and John Key)
hat tip owed to Lorde, of course.
Last night she received another award. And prizemoney. She said she doesn need the money as much as others and asked for the prizemoney to be divided amongst the nominees. In sport you constantly hear the refrain “who would turn down a money to break a contract”. In the business world you constantly hear about how |everyone” would do the same (low ethic) thing in that position.
Well done Lorde.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/music/9950870/Lorde-wins-Taite-award-for-Pure-Heroine
I’ve got many diamonds in the flesh
I cut my teeth on dollar dealing in the trade rooms
And I’m proud of my addresses,
Parnell and Hawaii, livin off dodgy dealins
Cos every speech is like I’m funny, safety’s loose, dyin in the workrooms
Blood stains, wages down, trashin’ all the unions,
We don’t care, we’re driving BMW’s on main streets.
But I just love Cristal, Maybach, diamonds on my timepiece.
Jet planes, islands, bodyguards on a gold leash.
I don’t care, I’m not caught up in your need for welfare.
And I wanna be royal (royals).
I can buy that strain of blood’
That kind of luxe is just for us.
I crave a celebrity sized buzz.
Cos I became your ruler (ruler),
You can call me Lord Key
And stoolies I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule.
Yea, I’m living that fantasy.
[Verse 2]
My friends and I—we’ve cracked the code.
We count our millions at the donor parties.
And everyone who knows us knows that we’re fine with this,
We do anything for money.
Cos every speech is like I’m funny, safety’s loose, dyin in the workrooms
Blood stains, wages down, trashin’ all the unions,
We don’t care, we’re driving BMW’s on main streets.
But I just love Cristal, Maybach, diamonds on your timepiece.
Jet planes, islands, bodyguards on a gold leash.
I don’t care, I’m not caught up in your need for welfare.
And I wanna be royal (royals).
I can buy that strain of blood’
That kind of luxe is just for us.
I crave a celebrity siezed buzz.
Cos I became your ruler (ruler),
You can call me Lord Key
And stoolies I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule.
Yea, I’m living that fantasy.
Ooh ooh oh
I’m bigger than I ever dreamed,
And I’m in love with being Lord.
Ooh ooh oh
Life is great without a care
I’m not caught up in your need for welfare.
And I wanna be royal (royals).
I can buy that strain of blood’
That kind of luxe is just for us.
I crave a celebrity siezed buzz.
Cos I became your ruler (ruler),
You can call me Lord Key
And stoolies I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule, I’ll rule.
Yea, I’m living that fantasy.
This needs to be set to music with the backing video of Key wining and dining and living it up with the Royals.
Brought here by Key in election year to epitomise the principal of a glittering born to rule elite, that Key seeks to stamp on the consciousness of this country.
Yup, and don’t forget his hollywood friends… he does like to celebrity it up
Speaking of Odes
Where is our Philip Ure?!…..come in Philip Ure and your Vegan Sausage(s)….we miss you ( that is everyone except bad12 and he does not count)
…we miss you odes and witticisms…stop sulkiing!
Agreed Chooky, I know many don’t like Phillip’s writing style but having met him once in person I can say he is a lovely guy and I miss his musings.
I miss Phil too. Seems even Bad does. I think it is the healthy diet turning Bad into a nice guy, we may have to call him Sweet12 soon. He just needs to drop the fish, too much mercury or it will be Mad12!
Ffffing Mad is an epithet often attached to me round here,(i think there is some documentation in the box under the sink that somewhat supports this allegation, although of the 3 ‘doctors involved there appears to be an inability to reach a consensus)
Mad/bad12 as a handle might have been confusing for those logging on to the Standard in the morning,(especially me, its hard enough coping with being a million different people from one day to the next without having to ascertain my ‘mental’ state every morning, so best stick to bad),
Miss Phill, nah not a bit,(that might provoke his return), in relation to Phill V PG, well yeah Phill was way more fun,(my idea of fun tho having to be tempered against expectations of being caned),
i have it in my mind that i will have to greet Phill’s BS with either ignorance or 🙄 to avoid having myself ‘going down in flames’ upon his return, but, probably wont be able to resist…
Heh, Heh, Heh, certainly ‘counted’ in that little ‘contest of ideas’, Phill only brought one to the debate, idea that is, it encapsulated my impression of the sum total of His intellect and as far as ideas go simply added a No…
Final electoral boundaries are due to be announced today. I am interested in the result as my home is about 50 metres away from the edge of the draft New Lynn electorate boundary and if it moves towards me then John Key may become my local MP …
You can make appointments with his office and see who actually turns up.
Due to golfing and drinking considerations this office no longer takes appointments, however Mr Key is always happy to speak with his constituents, hear their concerns, and help where he can. To arrange a meeting, please approach either Antione’s Restaurant or The Northern Club with a minimum of $5000 in cash.
mr key is unavailable today, unless thats you Wills?
Lucky you!
could be worse, you could be in the 3 legged pig with lipstick electorates of Oahariu and Epsom
My Mum and Dad aren’t to happy about to electoral boundaries too, they live in a part of Hei Hei that could be a tory seat by tonight and they have in touch with Mike Mora (He and merry bunch are trying to stop the change) to stay in a Labour held electoral seat where their 2 votes will count.
The drought has broken, (this time).
Drought: ‘The impact is huge’
Drought: Rain still on track for weekend
“through an act of God. ”
Yup, he will be voting for the climate change deniers again… and asking all of us to subsidise his union members because he thinks his invisible friend in the sky is responsible.
PS I know Act of God is an insurance/legal term, but he is still deliberately framing his comment this way. ie climate change denier and farmers don’t choose where to farm, what to farm, or to stay farming.
Officially only ACT and the Conservatives deny the reality of human induced climate change
DROUGHT GREAT TIME TO SHOW SOME COMPASSION
I don’t think Bruce Wills and the Feds are climate change deniers, and so are unlikely to vote for ACT or the Conservatives. Like the “cooperatives”, (Fonterra?) the Fed and Wills are ignorers.
In this area there is a lot more electoral choice.
In fact there is a whole vipers nest of climate change ignorers, right across the political spectrum it’s a much bigger field with lots to choose from.
The snakes that ate the elephant in the room
you dont think a chunk of acts low polling is farmers?
nationals actions and inactions speak volumes on their attitude to climate implications and the environment.
john key reminds me of slampacker from the stark novel by ben elton… buying his way to a new home on the moon once hes shat all over earth.
Meanwhile back in the jungle, it appears that the recent trip to China by Slippery the Prime Minister to sort out ‘trust’ issues over the Fonterror false positive whey scare worked so damn well that Fonterror’s whey products are still banned from that country,
Quoted on RadioNZ National news this afternoon the PM claims that there is no ban in place the Fonterror whey products are ”just not allowed into China as the Chinese await a New Zealand Government report on the original ‘contamination”,
i have the impression that inside the mind of our Prime Minister is a cracked CD firmly stuck on BULLSHIT which forces Him to find novel definitions for everything…
not banned but not allowed in…
jeshus!!
oh my 🙂
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/auckland/news/nbbus/266137544-oravida-expanding-into-gold-mining-
Conflicts anyone? No ,no?
nothing to see here
Heard about the Oravida expansion into gold mining in NZ on Radio Active this morning, on the regular Thursday morning slot with Redbird, Alistair Thompson and Grant Robertson. Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse……….!
Thompson’s view was that APN and Fairfax haven’t covered the Collins/Oravida saga consistently due to the lack of investigative journalism and that there is much more to uncover. He did suggest however that the story may have reached a tipping point and the MSM would have to start paying more attention. He also suggested that despite Key’s complicity in the saga that it’s possible that her position as Minister may be untenable……
Sorry, no link to that interview.
Thanks Rosie for that info. Much appreciated.
judith can hear the jug boiling from her office
“People commenting anonymously may think they are immune from defamation but that could be put to the test legally.”
Leaving aside the fatuousness of how that comment has been phrased, it’s point is actually wrong. The people that got sued were the people that published the defamation, not that people that made comments ie the website owners and Fairfax. It’s an important distinction.
this is why people need to read the decision before posting it. the decision has all anyone need know. the media will have relied on a press release. I read the decision before coming here to post about it.
its this part of petes posting that bothers me about his new position at politicheck. editor has a skill set and it is disrespectful to those who have these skills and experience to say you can just become one. like slater and the truth.
Haven’t had time to look at the decision. Were commenters mentioned at all? I’m curious at what level FB was accountable. Was FB approached to remove comments?
Agreed about PG/politicheck. That he won’t take feedback about this or his behaviour also is a concern.
+1 and what does it say about politicheck that such a partisan wannabe polly can get such a gig.
PG is part of that CT architected media landscape with a probable mandate to produce as much inconsequential waffle as his copy/paste allows across blogland.
“The people that got sued were the people that published the defamation, not that people that made comments ie the website owners and Fairfax. It’s an important distinction.”
Purkiss was judged against for making comments only.
Although I understand Mr Purkiss was also an administrator, along with Kevin James. One of Kevin’s statements was found to be defamatory but he didn’t get sued.
Parker for both commenting and publishing.
No, one was sued as a publisher the other as an author. I should add, that some of the defamatory statements were written by named people, and they were not sued.
Below she succinctly outlines the status of publisher for the purposes of the law (and her decision) and refers to Wishart, (which can be found here http://www.buddlefindlay.com/static/Wishart_v_Murray.pdf (46 pages))
In my decision in Wishart v Murray & Ors I traced the history of US, UK and
Australian decisions that considered publication via Facebook I concluded that the status of publisher in an internet context depended upon editorial control rather than actual knowledge of the existence of defamatory material. A Facebook page is to be regarded as similar to a noticeboard.
[13]I concluded in Wishart that those who host Facebook pages or similar sites
are to be regarded as publishers of postings made by others in two circumstances.
The first is if they know of the defamatory material and do not remove it within a
reasonable time in circumstances that give rise to an inference that they are taking
responsibility for it. The second is where they do not know of the defamatory
statement but ought, in the circumstances, to know that material being posted is
likely to be defamatory.”
Bagelo v Smith seems to traverse the kind of “cut and thrust” commenting that people make here, WO and KB, to name only a few. Courtenay does, imo, send a warning to people who post, namely, that they are not protected from the law of defamation. I suspect she is saying between the lines, that because people are not being sued on a daily basis doesn’t mean they are not defaming people. For example a comment by Kevin James was found to be defamatory, with parker being held responsible as publisher, but James himself was not sued.
part of the reason for this is that people sue the ones with money (hence fairfax or trademe get sued) and I hope, for karam’s sake, the settlements with them covered his legal costs, permitting him to sue the other two on principle. Without knowing anything about either defendant, I wonder if either can afford to pay out? One made no appearance and the other defended himself.
“Baglow v Smith which distinguished internet fora and blogs from other forms of publication.
This distinction was made on the basis that the context of an ongoing debate would reduce the sting of the defamatory comments as sharp and witty replies are seen merely as part of the ‘parry and thrust’ of the debaters.
[29]
However, there is no principled basis on which internet fora and blogs
should attract a different test for what constitutes a defamatory statement.
There may well be a degree of casualness associated with contributions to online conversations
. In this regard they might be likened to talkback radio. However, the capacity for harm
resulting from the permanent nature of posts means that those posting statements
should not be relieved of the usual constraints imposed at law.”
Her honour usefully goes three each alleged defamatory statement and explains why they are or are not defamatory. Not all were found to be defamatory. It makes useful reading to help understand the distinction.
“No, one was sued as a publisher the other as an author.”
Parker “sued Mr Parker in respect of comments that Mr Parker himself posted on these sites and also as the publisher”:
Purkiss “only in respect of comments”:
yes, Pete, I know that. Thanks for fact checking me.
when did you read the decision pete
I’ve read parts of it since mid-morning-ish but as I’ve already said I need time over Easter to read it properly. Someone I know advised they had a copy before 7 but I didn’t have the time nor need to get one off them then, I knew it would become available soon enough. I’ve also seen useful comments on it, including from lawyers. And I’m sure there’ll be a lot more to be added to the discussion.
Blogs are for initiating discussion aren’t they?
🙄
but you felt you could post warningss based on something you hadnt read.
i didnt see your comment about needing time to read it over easter, so i reread your opening post
you dont have to wait for lawyer friends, you can google seach judicial decisions online nz, put in karam and bingo.
a new tool for your fax checking armoury.
i thought you wanted to make change, but posting before reading the crucial favts, when they are available to you, not linking to that document and purporting to give advice on it, isnt really what you are trying to achieve are you?
I haven’t read the full file. However, my understanding is that the “cut and thrust” that happens on the Standard is not defamation.
This is what Karam is stated as being unhappy with at the beginning of the case file:
I think the discussion here has been confusing ad hominems and general personal abuse of the “you’re a dickhead” kind (basically an opinion), with defamation (something far more specific and stated as fact without any evidence supporting it). A certain amount of abuse is accepted on TS as part of the “robust debate”. Defamation is deleted as soon as, because the trustees of the site regard themselves as being the ones who would be taken to court over it.
So something more general stating someone lacked integrity would be allowed. But something like that quoted above (allegations that Karam “had defrauded the Legal Services Agency”), is getting far more specific and could be supported or not by evidence – without evidence, it could be judged as defamation.
On TS, it’s more usually “pointlesss” abuse that gets moderated, especially if it looks like tr0lling or a deliberate thread derail. But other abuse is often left unmoderated.
Defamation in the US also takes into account a person’s public reputation, and whether that has been damaged. A well known person is more likely to be able to prove defamation than a non-entity. ie they need to show their reputation has been publicly damaged.
In Karam’s case, the complaint was that there had been a concerted attempt to damage his reputation over time. So the general “cut and thrust” on blogs where people abuse each other, probably wouldn’t count.
the comment must lower the persons reputation in the eyes of an ordinary person. that is a very nutshell version of one of the main tests.
hence calling a politician a liar is hard to prove as defamation because politicians are frequently described in surveys and polls and by the public as untrustworthy.
it is wrong to think only public figures or people known to the public can be defamed.
Agreed. Good eg about politicians. I was just thinking why MPs don’t usually pursue defamation – eg Cunliffe could claim Gower had defamed him in repeatedly stating that Cunliffe had attempted a leadership coup. Generally, there is a fair amount of leeway.
it is wrong to think only public figures or people known to the public can be defamed.
I didn’t say that. I said, it’s more likely. But context is very important, I think.
But, if a non-entity felt they had their work reputation defamed, they’d be more likely to take out a complaint.
i think, with respect, you might be confusing being able to sue for defamation and being defamed. most people simply cant afford to sue to redress the damage done to them or their business. public figures tend to have easier access to funds or pro bono lawyers.
i agree entirely, context of a statement is crucial.
i hope you get time to read the decision, and the wishart ruling. i think you will enjoy the analysis of the statements.
at my first law firm patricia courtenayhad just been appointed a partner. an incredibly earnest and intelligent lawyer who cut her teeth on insurance law. i always enjoy reading her decisions even if i dont agree with every point.
Oh, I imagine if it was some smear against a business person they would want to sue for defamation, whether or not they could afford it.
But I was thinking most non-entities don’t have widespread enough reputation to be damaged. And if something was said/publicised about such people, it would mean little to most of the public – unless it was something extremely sensational,
Most people in the public eye don’t sue people for every single public smear or criticism. Someone with a lot of social capital would probably have the power to refute the allegations without having to take it to court.
I note (in the NZ Herald article) in awarding costs for damages to reputation, the judge took into account Karam’s previous good reputation in various realms of activity – ones that would give him a fair amount of standing in certain sections of the community/public sphere:
PS, I’ll read the judgement another day. I’m still recovering from being battered by an extremely strong and wet gale this morning – a total drenching, after a drive though some pretty treacherous conditions.
The flowerbeds and duckponds of Auckland’s Domain look innocently picturesque – but they tell a strange story about imperialism and war: http://readingthemaps.blogspot.co.nz/2014/04/gardening-and-imperialism.html
Karol/Lyn
Has The Standard been contacted by Chen Palmer in the past 36 hours?
What a disaster. Govt debt is 60 billion under Key. And now English wants to claim a surplus!
How corrupt is that, its the false belief that cutting taxes would increase govt revenue, that
ideological nonsense of the right, that has cause this disastrous fiscal mess.
yup, the debt that is defended by saying “it would have been higher under labour”… hard to prove or disprove that, which is not the same as it being true.
Can’t have a surplus until the borrowings are paid back. Probably need to have that written into Law.
Just a helpful hint for the Standardistas.
When reading Pete George, I find it best to think of him as a backwater tram conductor who aspires to one day be like Stephen Franks.
Then you’ll just chortle and ignore him.
Where is Lynne….been quiet for afew days/
Rushing to get a build finished before easter. Work sometimes gets in the way of blogging
Something that might bring a smile to you lefties:
http://imperatorfish.com/2014/04/15/a-statement-from-david-cunliffe/
and just to let you know its not that bad:
http://imperatorfish.com/2014/04/02/chin-up/
-David Bennett MP, NZ National Party.
And all the Natz are living up to that promise!!
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/9951066/Adviser-steps-forward-in-defence-of-Collins
Well there we go
😆
Means nothing, if the purpose of the dinner was to impress upon a Chinese border official that Oravida is a very important company that owns its own Minister of
CorruptionJustice, why on Earth would they need to be overt about it? Her presence would be enough.Just as John Key promotes Oravida when they pay him to model for them, just as Dan Carter promotes that shampoo by walking past a camera with his hand on his head: nothing need be said.
a private dinnerwith friends, but the advisor says it was short cos people there didnt speak the same language. so collins is friends with people who she doesnt understand and dont understand her?
the advisor doesnt say that border control issues werent discussed…
so to summarise collins private dinner with friends included an employee and at least one person she couldnt speak with due to language differences.
What was her adviser doing at a private dinner with close personal friends, and their close personal friends?
having dinner ?
Quite! I ask because the dinner was either private, or official, but surely not both. Does Margaret Malcolm accompany Judith Collins to all private dinner engagements? What about the movies?
Heather Simpson attended quite a few things with Helen Clark – people often develop close friendships with the people they rely on. Yes, it does look bad, but not so bad it couldn’t be perfectly innocent. Way too much confirmation bias here.
Not looking good chaps
Latest Roy Morgan
National 48.5% (+5.5%)
Labour 28.5% (-3.5%)
Greens 11.5% (-1.5%)
NZFirst 5.5% (no change)
Conservatives 2% (-0.5)
Maori Party 1% (-0.5)
Mana 1% (+.5)
Internet Party 1% (+0.5)
Act 0.5% (no change)
Other 0.5%
Keep up the Orivida attack, it’s such a winning strategy.
Idiots.
Meh I don’t think much has really changed.
The only thing that surprises me is that there is 1% and 2% of people dumb enough to say Internet party and conservative party respectively although perhaps like the 0.5% saying ACT they are just taking the piss out of Roy Morgan.
Labour dropping significantly into the 20% zone ain’t good.
I’m predicting it to go quite a bit lower.
Oh there’s no doubt that Labour’s in tatters and that the hope they had in Cunliffe was seriously misplaced. I think the Greens will do quite well at this election as people who can’t stand the Nats see them as a better option than labour.
What will be interesting is to see who the Nats try and stitch up a deal with as Winston first is a bit like one of those vampires that you can’t seem to kill even with a stake through the heart.
It will also be interesting to see whether the Nats really have jumped 5% in two weeks – apparently at Lab/Greens’ expense – whether the increase in Mana and the IP’s support continues, or whether the whole poll is a bit of an outlier.
A Royal blip, I’d say.
In relation to National’s support it looks like they’re just back to where they were in late Feb/early March (48 & 48.5).
Just had a look at Roy Morgan specifically. In 2012 National averaged 45.5% in all RM polls, 44.4% in 2013 and so far this year it’s 46.3%.
They will be comfortable where they’re at.
What did they average in 2011?
Ha, now that has made my day.
But but but the trend is looking upwards according to Mickey Comical ali savage so its nothing to worry about
[Snip – free speech is wasted on some people. BTW I only said that I hopelessly partisan – MS]
Hey now cut that out, he says Cunliffe doesn’t want just yes men in his team so that proves hes no fanboi 🙂
http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-14112011/#comment-400632 (self admitted partisan hack)\
[And? I agree I said that I was hopelessly partisan. I have never described myself in the other term you used – MS]
I’d doubt this has much to do with the Collins/Oravida scandal and Labour’s pursuit of it. I’d hazard a guess that this poll is a reflection of voters dislike for disagreements between Labour and the Greens over whether or not to outline potential coalition arrangements in the lead up to campaigning.
So you think Labour dropped because they won’t commit to the greens and this is voters punishing them for not making that obvious choice?
No I think it’s voters expressing their displeasure at public disagreement between Labour and the Greens over campaign strategy. For what it’s worth my preferred outcome for the General Election is a Coalition Government comprised of Labour and the Greens plus maybe Mana. But I think the Greens tactic of trying to shoehorn Labour into that position before the election was a mistake and this poll, I think, bears that out. By the way BM have you seen today’s ODT editorial? The one that calls on Key to sack Collins? It’s saying something, don’t you think when one of the conservative daily broadsheets calls for a Cabinet Minister’s sacking?
don’t forget the royal visit 🙂
How could I forget McFlock, I got about as close to them as possible while they were here in Queenstown and to be honest, like everybody else (it seems), my anti-monarchist sentiments melted away like ice in the Sahara. She’s that bloody lovely.
A similar tactic is used to sell sports cars to midlife-crisis males 🙂
Likewise, that story only broke on 9 April and the poll started on 31 March so I don’t think the Labour/Green thing has yet impacted on any published polls.
Also, I doubt any newspaper editorial counts for anything. Sadly, people don’t read them, except for political tragics like all of us here.
Presuming it is valid, and RM does bounce around, it seems that the Royal Tour has had the desired effect …
Roy Morgan call cellphones and therefore doesn’t have that anti-Labour / pro-National “landline bias” we hear so much about.
So Matthew do you think the royal tour has had an effect? Anne’s cartoon (linked below) sums things up!
Maybe some effect but certainly not all of it.
Polling was carried out from March 31 to April 14, presumably with most calls completed in the first week – seehttp://www.roymorgan.com/findings/5549-new-zealand-voting-intention-april-17-2014-201404170455 (The second week is usually spent doing call backs if they use the same methodology that other polling companies use.)
The royal tour started on 7 April and the cute Plunket thing wasn’t until 9 April – see http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-william-kate-middletons-itinerary-3206058
Yep,Cunliffe dorky comment about not getting enough face time with the royals no doubt contributed to the poor poll result.
No, that happened after most of the polling was completed.
So it was just Cunliffes natural drag factor?
You’ve been around a while, how would you rate Cunnliffe, Bob Jones said he’s never heard a politician talk so much shit, would you agree?
Put it this way, I think that by now, David Shearer, despite all his faults, would be regarded as the incoming PM and John Key seen as a two-termer. Labour made a terrible mistake going for David Cunliffe.
🙄
Why do you think David Shearer would have beaten John Key?
He doesn’t, he thinks if Shearer was still there then National would definitely be in next term. As it is, Labour could lead the next government.
Please ignore, Micky.
Hamish (above) – because he was focussing on the median voter and also came across as an “ordinary kiwi bloke” but one with a social conscience and a background in working for the most disadvantaged people in the world, at personal risk to himself.
But he stammered in front of the cameras. Don’t you think that John Key would have easily beaten him in a debate?
Hamish, please ignore the bait.
You have better things to do with your time.
Yes, but the expectations would have been so low, the MSM would have called it a “draw”.
Plus, you have to consider that Cunliffe will also be a disaster in the debates, but the MSM expectations for him are much higher.
How does the MSM’s take on it come into it?
Hey Matthew I am brimming with ideas about who should be the next National Party leader and I really want to share them with the right wing. Judith Collins has to be your next leader. No ifs no buts she will lead National to a fifth term. After her I think you should go with either Kanwaljit Bakshi or Paul Goldsmith. Both of these candidates would be excellent leaders and would respect National’s traditions.
And by the way I would get rid of John Key as soon as possible. He is obviously a closet socialist and I expect that he will start the socialisation of the means of production any time now …
I know you jest but he does run a left wing, progressive government. That is why he is popular.
And I hope Judith Collins is the next leader. However it is looking increasingly likely that National will get a third and fourth term. So the next New Zealand Prime Minister may not currently be a member of Parliament.
Key runs a progressive left wing government? If that is where he occupies the political spectrum the world is doomed …
Micky, please ignore these people.They are not interested in debating with you.
They merely want to waste your energy on nonsense and they enjoy making provocative comments to get a reaction.
Paul, some of us really don’t have better things to do with our time and are quite aware of what the motives are of the people we are engaging with. Call it doing it for shits and giggles if you like.
It makes for very dull reading on this blog and it gives those people a sense of importance.
In your opinion.
Anyway…
Have you considered writing a guest post for TS?
Paul, what is your end game with this campaign of non-engagement?
How do you imagine the blog will be better to read if it is just wall-to-wall right wing propaganda?
Or do you suffer from the delusion that these people will stop posting if they don’t get a response?
silence means assent to those types and they never shut up plus i can’t stand reading their bullshit cascades where 2 or 3 of them comment to each other – no, much better to slam dunk them (just about) every time and I appreciate those who enjoy doing that and take the time to. If it becomes excessive – just scroll on by.
Yes and in today’s world Labour voters are too busy making ends meet to shoot the breeze of an afternoon with a pollster.
The Royal Effect
Edit: Oh #^*% – off Matthew. You’re like a school kid with a lollypop sometimes.
Ignore him. You have better things to do with your time.
His job is to spin for right wing interests. His job is a create a narrative or meme ; by discussing it with hIm, you amplify it. The MSM will repeat his words and publicise his views anyway.
He is not interested in genuine debate. As a paid opinion maker for the right, he is only here to divert, distract and disrupt.
😉
And just to piss off the drivers:
It seems that less and less people are supporting speeding.
I don’t support speeding but i’d like to see an increase in the limit in certain areas (SH1 between Oamaru and Christchurch in particular) + an increase in overtaking lanes
Agree, I’d like to see the speed limit raised to 120kph in certain areas.
100kph speed limit in modern vehicles is just ridiculous.
you passed your drivers test??
Why’s that?
i shudder to think of you or puckish behind the wheel of a car, at any speed let alone 120.
watching people on the roads today was an advertisement for public transport.
BM is a bus driver
Please ignore these people.
i know paul, you have sagely advised me before…
Actually, anything above 80km/h is ridiculous as it exponentially increases fuel consumption.
We really should be developing transport that runs on our own poo.
bm and puckish would have an endless free supply
@DTB+100…the slower you go the more fuel you conserve….i once drove in the snow/ice between Chch and Arthurs Pass and back again on one tank and one chain ….a lot of the time it was at a crawl no faster than a horse …5-10 k/hr ….but i passed about 40 vehicles that had skidded off the ice road and I got home
….the lesson i learned was that it is possible to go a very very long way on very little fuel if you drive very very slowly…..no faster than a trotting/walking horse and coach…..so there is hope yet…..when the fuel crisis bites we wont have to jump on a horse or donkey as our ancestors did ….just learn to drive very very slowly…like Granny or Grandad….safer too…and better for your health
It’s the roads that are the problem. They are for the most part not modern.
nonsense…the problem is in people’s heads…like yours
The only nonsense around here…is your…posts. I stand by my comment that most NZ roads are not good enough to warrant a speed limit of 120km/hr. Cars are safer, yes, but our roads are not.
You’re probably right about that. The big problem though is that speeds over 80km/h aren’t rational as it uses up more resources.
Yes I think I know you. Do you drive a smoky Mazda Familia with “No Fracking” stickers on the rear bumper?
Trying to guess who I am is against site policy.
Please ignore him. You have better things to do with your time.
@ Weepu’s Beard …. i still think what you say is nonsense ..why go 120km/hr?….no point…if you want to be a racing car driver join a racing club and get on the track …or join a rally car club…or go and live in Germany
……i have seen plenty of people drive past me at 120km/hr only to have me catch up at the next major intersection or lights….. and really speeding does not save much time in NZ, the distances for speed are too short
( btw i used drive my Peugeot at 120 km/hr on occasion on the motorway until i suspected cops were watching for me and my partner got on to me about fuel waste….
Speed Kills even on the autobahns
http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/may/13/speed-limits-reduce-number-road-deaths
@ Weepu’s Beard ..re “most NZ roads are not good enough to warrant a speed limit of 120km/hr. Cars are safer, yes, but our roads are not”….
Our young German visitors from Berlin after travelling around NZ for six months think our New Zealand roads are very good and there is no need to speed here
….They say that in Germany ( with a population of 80 million) there is a movement to put in place speed restrictions because of Co2 emissions.
They do not like using the autobahns because they are too fast/ dangerous and not relaxing ….and the difference in time ( saving about 15 minutes) if you go 160km/hr as opposed to 120 km/hr is not worth the effort
They say Germany has a very good public transport rail system and this is the way New Zealand should go…put the motorway money into cheap affordable Public Transport.
Hopefully over the next 30 years we can invest in better roads so we can have higher speed limits. A motorway from Wellington to Auckland for a start.
Labour and the Left should invest in Public Transport and axe the hugely expensive motorways which no one wants except NACT property developers and their mates who would like to privatise the roads for tolls and further marginalise and exclude the ordinary NZer from free travel
The money should be put into State education , Public Health hospitals , reduced Retirement age to 65, cleaning up the rivers and lakes , Research and Development, support for technology startups and entrepreneurial business development
Shows the Righties are getting very concerned about the issue of motorways under a Cunliffe led coalition government imo
you can use your genesis dividends and start building them yourself
I wish they’d keep to one speed tolerance level and not do these special holiday period deals. I tend to continue to work (part time) through holiday persiods, and forget when traveling to and from work that there’s been a change of approach.
Very quiet out there today. Down to running two webservers, something that usually only happens in the middle of the night after the backups are done.
Easter break early eh?
our rightwingers all get extra days around public holidays 😉
Nah, we are put off by the return of Pete George.
Probably power problems, ours was off for 7 hours on the North Shore!
Internet was down in West Auckland for the entire morning and into the afternoon. Came back on around 14:00
Urggh.
It was a freaking nightmare on the motorway this morning – rain, gales, and early holiday traffic heading for the hills.
possibly related to the panic-buying queues in the supermarket this evening.
Apparently one day without supermarkets is a cause for stocking up.
New electorate boundaries out. I’ve shifted in to Kelston as expected.
Thanks Drax.
Was Kelston previously part of the Waitakere electorate, and what will the changes mean for Kelston?
I see our electorate of Ohariu has taken on Wadestown as had been suggested. Come on down from those swanky hills Pinot Noir socialists and vote Dunne out!
(PS, saw your reply on yesterdays Open Mike re the you- know -who commenters. Thats an understandable view you have – I just don’t think those who you are replying to are big on logic and evidence. Cognitive dissonance seems to be more their thing. Agree that clarification may be helpful for the silent readers)
fascinating how quickly bennett abandoned the west
There was a good article about politicians not being from the electorate that they represent a few days ago on the Guardian. Paula Bennett is one of those parachuted politicians – going to where the grass is greener, where they’re more likely to be voted in.
bennett is from taupo and schooled there but a “westie”
bridges is from auckland and educated there but describes himself as a “tauranga boy”
knowing how it will be heard by their electorates
The new Kelston electorate has parts from New Lynn (Where I was previously), Waitakere and a part of Te Atatu – if I’m reading the map right.
And I really don’t know what that’s going to mean. I have a feeling that it’s probably going to be good for the people here especially if we get a left MP. I’d prefer Greens or Mana or even Alliance but we’ll probably get Labour.
Ta Drax. All the best for a Left win for Kelston.
I have a bit of a soft spot for West Akld from the days when I used to visit my friends out west who were of Dalmatian descent. I never forget their their amazing hospitality. I got the feeling that people were more on the level in the West and it didn’t feel like the natural home of Blue to me – I hope it turns shades of red, green and red/black on 20th September, enough to kick out that faux westie, as Tracey points out, comes from Taupo anyway.
If its Carmel Sepuloni then you should be right. She’s impressive in every way.
I’m in Kelston, too. It goes as far as Sunnyvale, near Henderson, and out onto the North Western – anyone living on the causeway is in Kelston. And includes part of Titirangi.
I was previously in New Lynn.
I’m still in New Lynn … just. Mind you John Key is going to find out that campaigning in the Waitakere Ranges is not a pleasant experience. Too many of the talented educated people there have far too much concern for the environment.
what makes you think he will go there at all?
He would be well advised to steer clear!
Did he ever visit the existing Helensville electorate?
Lols. Seen this?
http://www.greenpeace.org/new-zealand/en/take-action/Take-action-online/sack-simon-bridges/?utm_source=scoop&utm_medium=banner&utm_term=sacksimon&utm_campaign=sacksimon
Sorry about the massively long link. Haven’t mastered writing over a link yet. Have only just mastered rolly eyes, today!
Anyway, no harm in trying eh? Over 17,300 signatures already.
thanks rosie
i started my letter by asking the pm if he can confirm that mr bridges reads documents before he signs them off.
Excellent Tracey 😀
ttp://www.nbr.co.nz/article/opposition-damages-public-morality-oravida-claims-dc-154962
(My comment – yet to be published)
Yes – note the difference between the NSW situation, where the Premier has resigned because he misled the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption.
NSW has an Independent Commission Against Corruption – New Zealand does not.
High time we did – because – in my considered opinion, New Zealand is rotten with corruption, and our ‘perceived status’ as the ‘least corrupt country in the world’ is nothing more than a sick joke.
http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/results/
Please be reminded that on the watch of Minister of Justice Judith Collins – New Zealand STILL has not yet ratified the UN Convention Against Corruption.
Has she even read it?
It would appear that she has not.
Have these mysterious ‘Cabinet officials’ who purportedly give advice on corrupt ‘conflicts of interest’- read it?
It would appear that they have not.
Here – read it for yourselves – and ask how can it be possible for the ‘least corrupt country in the world’ to have not yet ratified the UN Convention Against Corruption?
http://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNCAC/Publications/Convention/08-50026_E.pdf
What a CROCK.
Penny Bright
+100 Penny
What’s going on with Labour and welfare fraud? Last month in an interview:
Today:
Would Labour scrap legislation they’ve just voted for?
Labour Pains
Your fact-checking still needs work.
Isn’t that the same thing that PG quoted?
Yeah, multi-tasking not working.
Sorry PG.
OK. Sue Moroney explains in her speech, why Labour decided to support the Bill. It has to do with submissions to the select committee by many women who felt they were unfairly being left to carry the penalty for relationship fraud. As I understand it, the women’s complaint was, when a woman fraudulently claimed she was a single parent/woman, the partner was complicit in the fraud, and should be penalised as well as the woman.
Sue Moroney’s speech is here in a video. She also slams National’s beneficiary bashing, especially in a time of high unemployment. She also says tax fraud should be dealt with harshly.
Well, vote for it and own then, even if there are bigger priorities.
Saying you’ll scrap it once in power, at the same time as supporting it in the House, just makes Labour MPs look like prevaricating prats.
What it really shows is that the right is still firmly in control of caucus. There are other remedies for the scenario outlined in submissions.
Yes. I don’t agree with Labour on this, and am happy to see that Mana and the Greems didn’t support it.
Saying you’ll scrap it once in power, at the same time as supporting it in the House, just makes Labour MPs look like prevaricating prats.
Although, Moroney indicated Labour had changed their minds upon hearing some select committee submissions. So they weren’t sayign scrap it while simultaneoulsy supporting it.
Labour was stating the two positions simultaneously. Gordon Campbell’s interview with Cunliffe was published on the very day Labour voted for the Bill’s second reading (March 18).
Although, Cunliffe was interviewed on March 10 for that Werewolf article – says so at the beginning of the article. He does seem to be saying something different from what Moroney and Jacinda Ardern said later in debating the Bill and supporting it. Their consistent line was that they wanted to see tax fraud treated as strongly as beneficiary fraud. They were concerned about the low level of evidence needed to find someone guilty of relationship fraud and were supporting an amendment to change that – don’t know if the amendment passed.
Labour could still scrap that particular part of the amendment later on, I guess.
I do think Labour could come out more strongly generally in supporting social security, and turning totally away from the punitive beneficiary bashing policies of National. I would have preferred Labour not to support the Bill.
Yep, I said published, rather than when the interview was conducted.
An eight day lag time. Submissions on the Bill were due last October 10, so the concerns were aired well before Cunliffe’s interview.
I agree with your point about social security, but notwithstanding the issues in this particular legislation, its handling feeds into a bigger perception that the party doesn’t know where it stands.
Well. I think the Labour Caucus is pretty consistent in its main lines – including on how they debated the Welfare Fraud Bill. They put primary focus on employment and jobs, and benefits as a back up to that. They also made a big repeated line about there should be as harsh a penalty for tax evasion as for benefit fraud.
They talk about beneficiary bashing in the context of rising unemployment. So, while they pay lip service to challenging bennie bashing, they want to be seen of the party of employment, jobs, and “fairness” for taxpayers.
Sue Moroney seems to be talking sympathy pandering claptrap.
I haven’t seen Labour try and substantiate their claims that National are doing nothing on tax fraud (and I asked them).
Borrows’ office provided:
I checked the Treasury website and what is claimed stacks up.
Labour are opposing and complaining a lot but they don’t seem to be doing their homework and backing up their claims, hence whenever they release new policy it’s automatically viewed with skepticism. In contrast Greens seem to have a functional and competent research unit and they communicate far more effectively.
I think there may be differences between how the figures are calculated. Deborah Russell talks about tax evasion as a “fraud” – ie people avoiding taxes through doing things that look legal. So they may not show up the Treasury calculations.
The problem is Labour don’t give many details. Cunliffe talked about tax dodging and they published graphics showing $6 billion of dodging, but I haven’t seen them elaborate.
http://yournz.org/2014/04/04/labours-fraudulent-claim/
Have you heard of this thing I like to call Google?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=10871292
Labour’s numbers are probably based on the research of Victoria University lecturer Dr Lisa Marriott.
Yes. Also The Greens have published a lot of info on tax evasion and how National has been lax on it… but I’ve had a long day. I don’t have time or inclination right now for further research. PG’s research seems to have been pretty limited. – tweets hardly amount to indepth research.
That is vague and lacks a lot of details.
No quantifying of “put the most effort into to” at all. And it sounds dubious. For example from budgets:
They spend five times as much on Management of Debt and Outstanding Returns as they recover on benefit fraud, which is about five times what they spend on it.
But MacLennan seems to be correct on one thing:
“The total amount of unpaid tax not yet detected is unknown.”
Try some more Googling.
Well, of course, any newspaper report is going to be fairly general. So, instead you could try looking for some actual research papers by the likes of Lisa Marriott.
Do you think someone doing scholarly research in such an area is not going to have detailed stats to back their arguments?
Treasuries stats are part of the problem. They are not looking so much at tax avoidance.
Russell Norman has also pointed to stuff like the tax working group, and cuts at IRD, etc.
You seem to just be looking for some quick to find stuff that will discredit Labour, and aren’t doing any indepth research into National’s claims. But…. that’d take a lot more time and reading than I want to do right now …. I need some down time.
Try some more Googling.
Pete George YOU are the one claiming Labour is being fraudulent, how about YOU back up your own claims?!
Unbelievable.
Pete, tell me, what is the definition of benefit fraud being used? Of those numbers, how many were the intentional, I have no right to this so I am going to tell a pack of lies to get it, kind vs my boyfriend has moved in, but isn’t really contributing to the household yet so I won’t notify WINZ yet?
I’d like to know how much of it is just overpayments by WINZ being erroneously classified as fraud to make the numbers look worse in order to justify another kicking.
Poor Pete. The fuckwit factchecker can’t tell the difference between a Bill and a provision in that Bill.
“If re-elected will Labour retain this provision or scrap it ?
David Cunliffe: Scrap it.”
EVIDENCE that New Zealand has yet to ratify the UN Convention Against Corruption:
https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/signatories.html
Yet New Zealand is ‘perceived’ to be ‘the least corrupt country in the world’ (along with Denmark, according to Transparency International’s 2013 ‘Corruption Perception Index’.
http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/results/
If New Zealand was genuinely the ‘least corrupt country’ – shouldn’t we be the MOST transparent?
If New Zealand was genuinely the ‘least corrupt’ and most ‘transparent’ – then arguably – shouldn’t we be the least financially secretive?
So – how then is New Zealand ranked the 48th most secretive out of 82 nations, in the 2013 Tax Justice Network ‘Financial Secrecy Index’?
http://www.financialsecrecyindex.com/introduction/fsi-2013-results
File (again) under ‘You Couldn’t Make This Sh*t Up’?
Want to see a ONE page ACTION PLAN which would establish a genuine, meaningful framework for transparency and accountability in New Zealand?
Try this:
http://www.pennybright4mayor.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ANTI-CORRUPTION-WHITE-COLLAR-CRIME-CORPORATE-WELFARE-ACTION-PLAN-Ak-Mayoral-campaign-19-July-2013-2.pdf
‘Where the people lead – the politicians will follow …..?”
Kind regards,
Penny Bright
So did the GCSB hack into the Roy Morgan website to change the latest findings?
Maybe it was the SIS?
http://www.roymorgan.com/morganpoll/new-zealand/voting-intention-summary
Must be because David Cunliffe didn’t get enough face time with Prince Willy?
28% = bummer…..
It must be a rogue poll surely. National’s polling puts Labour at 26%
http://www.elections.org.nz/voting-system/mmp-voting-system/mmp-seat-allocation-calculator?asPercentage=1&partyName_0=ACT+New+Zealand&partyVote_0=0.5&electorateSeats_0=1&partyName_1=Alliance&partyVote_1=0&electorateSeats_1=0&partyName_2=Aotearoa+Legalise+Cannabis+Party&partyVote_2=0&electorateSeats_2=0&partyName_3=Conservative+Party&partyVote_3=2&electorateSeats_3=0&partyName_4=Democrats+for+Social+Credit&partyVote_4=0&electorateSeats_4=0&partyName_5=Green+Party&partyVote_5=11.5&electorateSeats_5=0&partyName_6=Labour+Party&partyVote_6=28.5&electorateSeats_6=0&partyName_7=Libertarianz&partyVote_7=0&electorateSeats_7=0&partyName_8=Mana&partyVote_8=1&electorateSeats_8=1&partyName_9=M%C4%81ori+Party&partyVote_9=1&electorateSeats_9=2&partyName_10=National+Party&partyVote_10=48.5&electorateSeats_10=0&partyName_11=New+Zealand+First+Party&partyVote_11=5.5&electorateSeats_11=0&partyName_12=United+Future&partyVote_12=0&electorateSeats_12=1&partyName_opt_0=Internet&partyVote_opt_0=1&electorateSeats_opt_0=0&partyName_opt_1=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_1=0.5&electorateSeats_opt_1=0&partyName_opt_2=Other+Party&partyVote_opt_2=0&electorateSeats_opt_2=0&partyCount=13&optPartyCount=3&action=Calculate+parliamentary+seats
The Otago Daily Times publishes a 100 year old ‘from our files’ column, and I did enjoy today’s, a well argued missive about the pressing need for a servants’ union. Especially in the wake of the visit from the royal family, which among many other businesses in the UK, enforce zero hours contracts on domestic staff.
http://www.odt.co.nz/opinion/100-years-ago/299228/servants-union-needed
And in a similar announcement today the National Library and Auckland Council have launched a huge new resource – 82 years of New Zealand Herald has been digitised including letters and announcements and advertisements. It’ll be a fantastic resource for progressive bloggers. Any articles with a “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose” flavour you’ll find something suitably pithy in here to suit.
For a taster here’s Michael Joseph Savage on Labour Policy in 1938 – adequate wages, recognition that productivity gains should go to workers, health service, social welfare and pensions policy.
http://bit.ly/1ismYcR
UK Tory MP who helped kill Legal Aid is wiped out by defending himself
Thing is, he’s actually surprised by this:
One wonders if he read the bill before voting on it.
Disciples of Ayn Rand only care about 1 person.
Anyone following Laudafinem on the Blomfield stuff ?
Haka law passed
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11240050
Seems like a very good thing 🙂
Protects existing common use of Kamate while providing recognition to Ngati Toa.
Granny Herald hasn’t even managed to find anything to maori bash about it which itself is cause for minor celebration O_O