ME: Credit where credit’s due. The appointment of a minister for the South Island is a really great move!
FRIEND: How so?
ME: Well, he’s a Minister, he’ll advocate strongly for the South Island. Think about it, now we’ll get a complete Dunedin Hospital rebuild, now we’ll get modern, up to date ferries, and by 2026, now Nelson hospital will get . . .
FRIEND: Hold on, hold on. How’s this mearger man going to achieve all this?
ME: He’s a Minister, he’ll have a say . . .
FRIEND: But he’s not in Cabinet! He’ll have no say in any decisions made!
ME: What, he’s not in Cabinet? Then WTF use is he to anyone?
FRIEND: Perhaps he’s just a PR exercise! Y'know, window dressing to make it appear the CoC even knows where the South Island is!
Given that a large chunk of south islanders would hate them Māori s have wards and special seats I reckon it's just national sucking up to there base , hypocrisy rite large!
I would prefer that every region defined by a Regional Council boundary had 1 MP in Parliament.
Regional representation would be better than this half-assed approach, and because it represented governance boundaries it would also be better than Maori seats.
Depends on how it would change the number of List seats.
If you subtracted them off List seats it would at least give 11 Regional MPs something useful to do, namely to represent the needs of Regions and Councils,
It's got to be a topic for a pre-2040 constitutional discussion.
The final dangerous act of a senile old fruit and nut case.
Preemptive pardons, what the hell is that?
To protect his family and associates and senior Justice officials and politicians from Trump's threatened illegal unconstitutional acts of vengeance, outgoing US President Joe Biden has issued preemptive pardons for those in the political elite who have been threatened by Trump.
Of all the American democratic institutions and legal and justice systems being targeted by Trump, America's political elites are the best able to defend, themselves, publicly and in court.
To protect his own, the American justice and democratic institutions has been short circuited by Joe Biden.
As Biden and his family and associates clamber aboard a presidential pardon lifeboat, Biden's message to Americans is clear, 'You are on your own'
By pre-emptively removing themselves from the front line of Trump's unconstitutional attacks, Biden has invited attack on every other American institution and civil society organisation next on Trump's hit list..
At the very least this doddery old fool makes these law makers and government officials he has pardoned look guilty, (of something). This is raw meat to Trump's feral base that feed off conspiracy theories.
A genuine democratic leader with faith in the system would have challenged Trump to do his worst, and instead of short circuiting the system, relied on the American democratic institutions and legal system of checks and balances backed up by the American constitution to defend against Trump's attacks. For the political elite shielded by these pardons, the chance to defend themselves and their actions in court and in public, as they are able to do, more than most, has been lost.
Denying Trump's detractors and accusers their chance to be vindicated in the eyes of the public and on the record and by history, is a gutless surrender to Trump, and another monumental failure by the Biden administration. Possibly to be proved one of their worst.
You give pardons after someone has been tried and found guilty, not before.
Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Preemptive pardons presumes preemptive guilt.
A presidential pardon is supposed to be a show of mercy granted to the convicted and not a determination of guilt or innocence.
Finally; What sort of precedent is this setting for Trump?. to preemptively pardon himself for crimes he hasn't committed yet?
Surely the far centre extremists trying to protect themselves at everyone' else's expense are the hand maidens of the far right.
Biden issues preemptive pardons for Trump critics and Biden family members
By Kevin Liptak and Arlette Saenz , CNN
7 minute read
Updated 2:48 PM EST, Mon January 20, 2025
Tapper: "Biden’s preemptive pardons start of ‘crappy day’ for Department of Justice officials"
Washington CNN —
President Joe Biden on Monday issued an extraordinary slate of preemptive pardons for prominent critics of President-elect Donald Trump and members of his own family, using executive prerogative as a shield against revenge by his incoming successor….
,,,,,,Clemency for Gen. Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci and members of Congress who served on the committee investigating the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, was announced early Monday morning. Later, minutes before Trump was to be inaugurated as the nation’s 47th president, Biden also issued pardons for members of his family: his brothers James and Frank, his sister Valerie, and their respective spouses.
The pardons, coming in the final hours of Biden’s presidency, amount to a stunning flex of presidential power that is unprecedented in recent presidential history…..
Because Trump has said he will pursue those who did things that he personally disapproved of. I think it's an astute political move. It underlines the hijacking of proper judicial process that happens when Trump openly says he'll force legal proceedings to hunt his 'enemies'.
Well there's one thing: however far Mr Biden's actions may have strayed outside of "due process" (whatever that might be, now), he can't be charged with anything – the SCOTUS sez so.
I think Biden is being more cowardly and self serving than astute.
What about all the people Trump will go after that Biden hasn't given preemptive pardons to?
Rather than go through the proper legal channels to fight Trump's persecution of top officials, (on behalf of everyone else, especially those who will be next), Biden takes the coward's way out.
In 2020 Joe Biden said that preemptive pardons "set a horrible precedent"
From the Jake Tapper Transcript:
We should note, for career officials at the Justice Department this is a really crappy day, because it starts with these sweeping pardons….
And to a lot of people –
This did not go through the regular pardon attorney, the pardon process. And Biden when I interviewed him in 2020, right after he has been elected, had some very harsh things to say about the idea of Trump giving preemptive pardons to his family members. He said, 'It would set a horrible precedent.'
Overlooking Biden's sheer hypocrisy, if Biden has no confidence in the US legal and justice system to protect his family members or even justice department officials, how confident in the US legal and justice system can anyone else be, targeted by Trump and not protected by a preemptive pardon?
If the leadership won't stand up to defend themselves, the very least this will do is have is a chilling effect on the rest of the civil administration officials not protected by pardons to stand up to whatever excesses and abuse of civil liberties Trump has in mind
It was getting a bit late, in 2020 to be talking about preemptive pardons where there was no identified crime having been committed as setting some sort of precedent.
After all, the greatest of all US Presidents, Lincoln offered pardons to any member of the Confederacy and restoration of all their rights, except for the ownership of slaves to anyone who would swear an oath of allegiance to the United States. This was part of Lincoln's plans for the future of the South after the war and Congress wouldn't go along with them.
Then, on Christmas Day 1968 Lincoln's successor Andrew Johnson pardoned every soldier who had served in the Confederate forces. He could do it and he did. How about that for a pre-emptive strike.
We can go on all day about how the law is always right and useful.
Actually between Biden and Trump what they should have done is pardoned the entire lot who invaded the capital on July 6th, as well as all those who examined the breakdown afterwards.
There is now simply too much division within the United States to just keep jailing people for everything around January 6th whether you are Democrat or Republican.
Pretty much the same applies to New Zealand, and all the people that invaded the Parliament grounds.
A good NZ bipartisan review would say that the GG should pardon all those who were charged and convicted in Wellington as well. Those massive state interventions in vaccine mandates may have felt justified at the time, but in this cold light of day they were a massive overreach of state power.
Punishment is just endless in this case and the nations won't heal.
Those massive state interventions in vaccine mandates may have felt justified at the time, but in this cold light of day they were a massive overreach of state power.
Have you read the Phase One report of the NZ Royal Commission COVID-19 Lessons Learned?
Agreed, if Biden had any sense he would of pardoned Trump for crimes relating to his presidency instead of eventually starting investigations and various court cases.
Would have likely meant that Trump slowly faded from the headlines and I suspect wouldnt have run again. Instead the court cases provided a platform and the motivation given winning the election was the only way to save himself.
His claimed he won the election in 2020, then used of money from supporters to favour GOP loyalists over rivals. This was to maintain his control over the party and win the nomination for 2024.
Those massive state interventions in vaccine mandates may have felt justified at the time, but in this cold light of day they were a massive overreach of state power.
An overreach because of the backlash and political fallout, or an overreach because it's just fundamentally wrong for the state to do such a thing?
Bullshit! The govt. of the day saved thousands of lives or maybe you don't think that should have been a priority. We only did the same as almost every other country in the world with the partial exception of Trump's America and look what a massive cost in lives they paid.
Maybe you believe no country should have used mandatory isolation rules, leading to a global figure of a billion plus lives lost.
Um we did very different things to many countries. Sweden, Japan and plenty of others.
The mandates did very little apart from drive a big enough wedge in society that we have the current govt. They were a nonsense couldn't work plenty of jobs due to risk but could go and stand in line at the supermarket. The extra couple of percent vax rate they gained on a vaccination that didnt stop transmission was a massive over reach. The lives saved were down to the early lockdowns.
I also think it's a hindsight view. The variants before omicron were brutal, and there are people still not recovered from those infections.
Maybe there is a criticism of Labour for not adapting sooner, but I think many people fail to understand just how difficult it is to change policy fast in a crisis and do that well. Plus everyone was burnt out by then.
If you look back it's a view I exposed when the widespread mandates were announced. Cutting 5% or so of the population from society was always going to have some pretty severe and very long term consequences. Whilst small percentage wise it was actually a group of roughly 200000 people which became a significant and motivated voting block against Labour who essentially propelled NZ1st and Act into Govt.
I'd say by the time they are done whether one term or two the damage done will be far worse than Covid in it's entirety.
as is often the case, the real comparison is forgotten. It wasn't a choice between mandates and the covid we had. It was a choice between mandates and more people dying and becoming disabled. What's the cost of that?
While I agree that the mandates were a factor in the swing away from Labour, I think there would have been a swing away from Nat if they had been in charge. It's probably a natural consequence of being the government in power during a long emergency when there are no good outcomes, just less bad ones.
But Labour did make mistakes, and the degree to which some on the left still won't have that conversation is concerning.
There definitly would have been a swing away from Labour but I doubt nz1st would have made the threshold and lijely a point or 2 off Act as well which makes a Lab Green Tpm govt far more likely
"The lives saved were down to the early lockdowns."
Right you are. What did you think I was referring to? They went too long but its easy to criticise with the benefit of hindsight. At the time new mutations were appearing at regular intervals and nobody back then knew the effect they would have, so they erred on the side of caution. So convenient for critics like yourself to forget all of that.
As for the "wedge" created in society. That was caused by mischievous and vexatious outpourings of mis and disinformation… most of which came from hard-right American fake actors. It was picked up by our homegrown disinformation miscreants, and unfortunately believed by people who should have known better.
10min? My local Countdown inside the mall had lines that were often 1 hour long just to get in the store which was pretty at capacity for most of the day so accounting for the enclosed enviroment and shear number of people through a store in a day it would actually be far more likely to spread in the supermarket than a properly manage work place maintaining distance and rapid testing.
the solution to that problem is better supermarket systems during an emergency. It's not to increase general exposure to a serious viral illness.
I agree about the properly managed work place, I just don't think that's what was happening.
But also, I agree that the mandates weren't done very well and came with a hefty dose of ideological shunning (and not just from the government). IMO, that's why we have the social problem now. I think the mandates were a necessary evil given what they knew about Delta at the time. But the two NZs thing was incredibly stupid and made Labour hypocrites given their wellbeing/kindness rhetoric elsewhere. Be kind, but only to the people you agree with.
The mandates encouraged/forced many people to get vaccinated, to the point where 95% were vaccinated. This and the lockdowms saved around 18000 lives compared with the UK'S approach.
The mandates added maybe 5 percent to the total vaccination effort at tremendous cost. We wouldn't be dealing with the the current mob in power if we hadn't mandated.
fair enough. They did have the tone of 'fuck off, you're a terrible person'. Extraordinary to see a government do that, but then Mallard and others did the same at the occupation of parliament grounds.
I think this is why the whole kindness thing just fell over. Ardern should have been ushering in a new social standard of connection and tolerance, and in the end she botched.
It was botched the minute she did that two classes of people interview.
Not to mention the various ministers making ill advised comments. The KFC worker, the two woman that crossed the Auckland border spring to mind. Sent the signal it was ok to have a pile on essentially.
I’m a fan of using failures to inform good change. I think the issue here is twofold. Are we on the left willing to admit to our mistakes? And what do we do when those mistakes are ideologically driven?
Are we on the left willing to admit to our mistakes?
Some on the left are (sometimes) and some aren't. Incumbent politicians in particular are typically reluctant to admit to their mistakes (ideological and otherwise), for obvious reasons. If NZ's politics of kindness was a short-lived departure from the norm, then imagine how long the politics of admitting mistakes would last.
Imho, the decision to cancel the iRex project was a mistake, and an ideological swish of a new broom at that, but how would it serve Willis (or anyone) to admit that a year after the fact. We can only hope that as the costs of on-again off-again infrastructure tussles mount, greater consideration will be given to lasting bipartisan agreements about the infrastructure Kiwis need and how to fund it.
Dreams are free – for the many, not the few.
The problem is that to do what’s good for New Zealanders and New Zealand’s businesses would come at the cost of a reputationally bruising backdown from the Finance Minister. As much as I would hope she will, I don’t think she’ll put New Zealand’s wellbeing ahead of her pride.
agreed, the current system makes if very hard for politicians to be honest. I don’t really expect Ardern to address this even if she did have a change of heart, anymore than I expect Clark to. But it would be amazing if they did now that they are out of politics.
I was thinking of the left more broadly. Can we discuss the mistakes that Labour or the Greens or TPM have made, in a way that takes us somewhere useful rather than going round and round in the same old circles?
Can we discuss the mistakes that Labour or the Greens or TPM have made, in a way that takes us somewhere useful rather than going round and round in the same old circles?
Possibly, if the broad left can arrive at a consensus about what those mistakes are/were. Imho, it's best to focus on (big) issues for which a broad consensus exists, but we can't even agree on tax reform, six years after the Tax Working Group made its recommendations.
The right, otoh, are ruthless – the consensus of Mammon (the worship of material wealth) rules.
Yes, that's right, but one pivital error was not to guarantee jobs once the mandates were lifted. In the same vein, the temporary nature of the mandates needed to be hammered home.
The final dangerous act of a senile old fruit and nut case….
,,,,,Of all the American democratic institutions and legal and justice systems being targeted by Trump, America's political elites are the best able to defend, themselves, publicly and in court…..
We can go on all day about how the law is always right and useful…..
Whether, the law is always right and useful, or not, people and institutions attacked by Trump, who don't have the benefit of a pardon to hide behind, will have no choice but to use the law to challenge Trump's attacks.
Few if any of these institutions and individuals will have the resources and platform available to America's liberal political elite.
That of course is precisely why Biden had to pre-emptively pardon his family, key officials, and the whole of the Bipartisan Committee that investigated the Jan 6 insurrection.
He claimed he won the election in 2020 and formed a PAC to contest the result, but instead used the money to favour GOP loyalists over others. This was to maintain control over the party and win the nomination for 2024.
Pretty serious stuff from Anne Salmond on Newsroom. Terrifying?
Peter Thiel. “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”
A grim warning for what is happening via the Regulatory Standards Bill.
The question is, how can Act, a very small libertarian party, get away with such sweeping, quasi-constitutional initiatives in a liberal democracy like New Zealand?
According to the advance publicity, Slobodian’s new book, Hayek’s Bastards, traces ways in which neo-liberal ideas are merging with populist attacks on democracy, civil rights, feminism, the environment and climate change.
the thing that has changed is that protofascist libertarians are now emboldened to say this stuff out loud. Thanks Trump voters. And useless left wing parties who've been dithering over neoliberal power.
It is scary, and it's more scary now because they are saying it out loud. This means the culture has shifted enough for this to be acceptable.
The reason ACT are getting away with it is because the liberals have fucked up. Instead of presenting a comprehensive vision and policy approach that is an attractive alternative to the right, they've been making a hash of solidarity politics and rejecting anything that isn't neoliberal centrism.
People don't like being told they're bad/wrong. So of course they're going to look to populist parties that welcome them in. It blows my mind that the left doesn't get this. Better right than elected. Look how that's turning out.
It's not too late in NZ. But Labour simply winning the next election won't be enough. We, the left, have to change.
A NZ Labour party that can't formally acknowledge the harm done by Rogernomics is a party I can't vote for – heck, even Jim Bolger said neoliberalism had failed NZ.
Not sure if 'the left' in NZ is claiming they're "perfect and never get anything wrong"…
true, the NZ left isn't claiming that. I was taking a poke at certain lefties like MB who had literally just said the left don't have to change. The hubris in that position.
I also think the liberal left in particular have a political process position that we're the good ones and others should think like us. That's probably less of a problem that our inability to self reflect and talk about it. MB's statement just epitomised this, hence my sarcastic response.
Hoping you're not vegan, but one area outside of conventional politics where it's easy to see purity spirals is in parts of the vegan movement. I've known people in their 20s especially who've been vegan and want to start eating animal products again for health reasons, but they face immense social pressure from their vegan friends and peers.
The purity spiral is where it's not enough to be semi vegan or even to have doubts, and people would rather lose friends than allow others to differ from them. It's not just the eat animals or not thing, it's a whole set of prescribed behaviours and beliefs that get enforced through social sanctions (and increasingly through work sanctions). You have to believe all the things or you are morally bankrupt.
I haven't seen purity spirals in politics discussed in quite a while, but I remember the pile ons on NZ pol twitter where people would get destroyed for saying the wrong thing. It was terrible to watch. We can blame twitter platform for that, but that was NZ progressives doing it.
I think part of what we are seeing now is a result of the liberal left going too far and making belief politics more important than relationships. The people without such super strong convictions find it really off putting. Why would you want to vote for someone who is saying believe the same as me or you will be shunned? At the least, this was a massive own goal for the left, giving the right ammunition to portray us as removing freedoms.
Obviously there are other serious dynamics at play, including the manipulation of social media and mainstream media.
That’s ideology and ideological (and other) bias dominating discourse. Sounds to me this is a communication issue, not a fundamental political/philosophical difference of views & opinions. Language and framing are critically important in political discourse but they’re not the goal per se; fact-checking is a useful tool to gain understanding and make well-informed evidence-based arguments, choices, and decisions – PC is a (minor) distraction. The Right, particularly, has learned this and applies it very well to hijack the media with their Orwellian tricks such as double-speak. They are doing it so well that they have turned the tables and use the Left’s own values against itself – the Left has a tendency to kill its own as much as the Right does.
That’s ideology and ideological (and other) bias dominating discourse.
exactly. This is the general point I am making when I critique the left. But while I think it's a communication issue, I also think it's about fundamental positions. Or it looks that way, maybe someone can point out if that's not true.
For instance, vegans believe that killing or using animals is always wrong. That's a philosophical position.
Where vegans believe that everyone should be vegan, that's a political position.
Where vegans believe that the way to make everyone vegan is to shun people who stray from the first two, that's the ideological position. Not of veganism, but that it's valid to force people to think and act a certain way.
When I critique the liberal left, I am saying that all those things are happening, but it's really the last one that is the problem, and a particular problem for the left because the position that people in society can be forced to think something is antithetical to leftist positions of collective good.
It's also a problem for libertarians and I wonder if this is why the conversation can't be had. People react to the critique because it sounds like the RW libertarian critique. But thinking it is valid to force people to become leftist undermines progressive concepts of wellbeing for all. It's really hard for me to understand why this isn't recognised by many.
I think the progressive Left intrinsically have a harder job at coming up with compelling arguments and persuading others to join them and ‘existing members’ to stay in the tent. This can cause frustration and anger, obviously. But the underlying issue is that there’s no viable alternative yet or at least one that can be explained easily in relatively simple compelling terms that appeal and resonate enough for people to adopt it. At the moment, and at best, it appears to be a swirl of good ideas and vibes that feel disjointed.
As evolution has shown us, there are many distinct advantages of unicellular organism organising into multicellular ones at the costs of energy input required. I think that this same principle (biological law?) also applies to higher levels of life as well, including mankind, but this doesn’t provide a blueprint of what it could (not should) look like.
I think the progressive Left intrinsically have a harder job at coming up with compelling arguments and persuading others to join them and ‘existing members’ to stay in the tent
How come intrinsically?
But the underlying issue is that there’s no viable alternative yet or at least one that can be explained easily in relatively simple compelling terms that appeal and resonate enough for people to adopt it. At the moment, and at best, it appears to be a swirl of good ideas and vibes that feel disjointed.
Maybe. I think Corbyn made a good job of it but was stymied by the reactionary forces against him, most damaging were the ones inside his own party. I would count this as the central problem (in NZ too), but it’s true that modern humans are losing our creative imagination to see how things are being done differently.
As evolution has shown us, there are many distinct advantages of unicellular organism organising into multicellular ones at the costs of energy input required. I think that this same principle (biological law?) also applies to higher levels of life as well, including mankind, but this doesn’t provide a blueprint of what it could (not should) look like.
very cool. I’ve seen this used as a framework for understanding change by those insisting we can create a better world while in the polycrisis. Intervening at tipping points so we tip in the good direction not the bad one (to put is simplistically).
The exchange that is under Mickey's post on Luxon's reshuffle is a good example of folk being more correct, purer and (dare I say it) woke.
The original point was that it was poor form to comment on Simeon Brown's appearance/stature.
This led to whom the comment 'When they go low we go high' is attributed to'.
Then that morphed into the (politically) correct terminology for an American person of colour.
So far so tedious, but coz it's lefties involved there are the unnecessary barbs- "decent people", "do all black people look alike" etc.
All of which detracts from the original and important point, because having a crack at someone's appearance is dirty pool and a distraction from their political short-comings.
After all, we (the royal we that is) weren't impressed with the horse comparisons to a recent PM.
Plus, as this thread started out, I was tautoko weka's observation that the left needs to unify a truckload more especially if we really want this to be a one term government.
I tend to struggle (i.e. I get confused) with criticisms of alleged ‘pure/purity’ of the Left as being a root-cause for ‘something bad’. Ironically, the Left (or rather, Labour) weren’t so ideologically pure when they enabled Roger Douglas to introduce (unleash) neoliberalism here in NZ.
Unfortunately, this thread and Post have descended into rabbit holes such as PC, mockery (aka body-shaming), belief politics, and so on, none of this points or leads to unity.
FWIW, say what you mean, mean what you say, and without causing deliberate offence, but stick to evidence as much as is realistic and warranted under the circumstances and context, guided by firm but not rigid values & principles. I believe this is as useful a guide as any for robust constructive debate.
Yes, especially to last paragraph and drop the snark.
I don't think people are fully aware of the damage, distrust and disconnect done by the Covid response. Very much so those on the dissenting side.
Dissenters weren't all cookers, right wing, conspiracy theorists or unhinged. I feel the disconnect felt by many is also an overlooked aspect to the last election result. Less about 'punishing Labour, more Labour weren't or forgot to talk to them.
Is your or Weka’s argument that the government response to Covid-19 somehow is an example of what the (NZ) Left are doing ‘wrong’? Somewhere early on in this thread it went off track onto criticisms of PC-pure language and being, or not being, ‘pure’ enough for some dogmatic Lefties. Meanwhile, the Coalition is continuing its blitzkrieg of dismantling the State as we know it and replacing it with a new regime of libertarian and neo-liberal rules & regulations that will last beyond the next change of government in similar ways as did Rogernomics.
Not sure how to reply to yr last comment, the Reply tag isn't there.
"Is your or Weka’s argument that the government response to Covid-19 somehow is an example of what the (NZ) Left are doing ‘wrong’?"
No, not from where I am at.
The reason I bought up Covid response was that it had done huge damage- socially and politically. With the notion that the left needs to organise (work out what it stands for), coalesce around certain issues and unite. The uniting and coalescing becomes difficult if one is scorned or shunned for minor perceived infractions. Mislabelling a caramel coloured person for example.
All the more important for the reasons you point out.
Got it, and I’m happy to leave aside a discussion of Covid-19.
The uniting and coalescing becomes difficult if one is scorned or shunned for minor perceived infractions. Mislabelling a caramel coloured person for example.
Uniting and coalescing take effort and energy – the Right has got a much easier job in fragmenting and atomising society.
Is that mislabelling and the corresponding reaction, silly as it is, a cause or a symptom of the ‘disease’ that’s affecting the Left, in your opinion?
Mislabelling a caramel coloured person for example.
When, where and how?
Both African American and black American terms are in common use and without any PC issue. And most do not quibble about the amount of colour involved.
Is your or Weka’s argument that the government response to Covid-19 somehow is an example of what the (NZ) Left are doing ‘wrong’?
it wasn't my argument either, but to put it in that context, my view on the government response is that we were incredibly fortunate to have that government at that time, that they did very important things in managing a very difficult situation, *and* there were areas where they fucked up. How they handled the mandates was one of them. I don't mean the mandates were wrong (I think they were a necessary evil), but I agree with gsays that the way they were done caused a lot of resentment and Labour were largely unable to address that ever since (for lots of reasons, including ideology, but also pandemic burnout).
Somewhere early on in this thread it went off track onto criticisms of PC-pure language and being, or not being, ‘pure’ enough for some dogmatic Lefties.
I think gsays was saying that tone policing is not a priority given everything else that is going on, and that a big emphasis on it is part of the problem the left has. It's not a minor issue, it's part of the core dynamic of we're right and everyone should agree with us.
Meanwhile, the Coalition is continuing its blitzkrieg of dismantling the State as we know it and replacing it with a new regime of libertarian and neo-liberal rules & regulations that will last beyond the next change of government in similar ways as did Rogernomics.
I think it's worse than that. I think they are doing the next iteration of setting NZ up for fascism or authoritarianism (FJK's government was the first iteration). Unless the left/progressives come up with an attractive and viable alternative, I think NZ is heading down our own version of what is happening in the US and the UK. We're lucky that we still have time to change.
I agree that ‘tone policing’ is relatively unimportant in the greater scheme of things although being civil and respectful don’t take much effort and go a long way – some people like to be rude a-holes to others they disagree with.
I don’t accept the accusation that the ‘core dynamic’ or ‘core problem’ of the Left is “we’re right and everyone should agree with us” – there are certainly a few hardline dogmatic Lefties (as there are on the Right) around but I’d argue that they’re a minority. In other words, I think this is an annoying meme that seems to have taken hold on both sides of the spectrum with the Left being the main loser.
I have labelled this Coalition neo-authoritarian from the early days and indeed there are growing signs of proto-fascism. As I just wrote in another comment (https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-21-01-2025/#comment-2021913), TINA, for all intents and purposes.
"Is that mislabelling and the corresponding reaction, silly as it is, a cause or a symptom of the ‘disease’ that’s affecting the Left, in your opinion?"
A symptom. Loads of reasons we had for coming together either don't exist or there are other priorities.
Couple that with consumerism spending billions telling us how important we are. We can look past wee indiscretions if there is a larger cause in play.
Our politicians are more like managers than leaders. No vision or bigger picture for us to aspire to.
I think it started there, but it's not that straightforward right? Important progressive politics got labelled PC. But yeah, in hindsight it looks like the merging of liberal politics and neoliberalism and the dropping of class politics.
Somehow in that, progressive politics got lost and this neoliberal hybrid emerged that was more about the pressure to be pure. I remember early debates on TS about sexism and racism, but the point of that wasn't to frame white men as bad, it was to talk about the systems and to change them.
The current push to say white men are evil is fucked up and I don't understand why so many liberals cannot see the problem. Especially in country like NZ where Māori have a culture of care and respect for people (he tangata etc, and giving mana). That the left can't even have this conversation is very troubling.
don't have the energy to go get specific, cited examples, but the whole 'Karen' phenomenon is another example. What started out as a genuine political critique of how some groups of white women behave in relation to black people (specifically in the US context), morphed into trying to make out that white women as a class are bad/wrong, and then also became a handy stick legitimising sexists (some of whom are liberals).
Hardly anyone says all white men are evil. But the framing has shifted from white men have privilege in society because of structural issues, to white men have privilege in society, to white men are a problem.
When white men try to talk about that, they get shut down. By that stage we are a very long way from being able to talk about both how the patriarchal system privileging some groups means oppressing others (and what to do about that system) and from being able to talk about the specific problems that working class white men have under the same system.
It's not a coincidence that that happened during neoliberalism that has stripped Labour from its working class roots and seen voters and supporters abandon it en masse. But how often does the left talk about working class white men now?
do you think Labour has abandoned class politics? I'm asking because you appear to have just invoked a prominent racist activist male as a way of avoiding class analysis. It makes me think you don't understand the argument here.
Probably, gsays, people called out offensiveness without being 'nice' about it. Remember, you're free to say anything you want. But of course then you must face the consequences of using abusive language, even if you as speaker don't perceive it that way.
If some 'lefties' 'policed' your language on others' behalf, then I don't think you understand how much micro-agression women used to, and minorities still do, suffer in NZ. Hidden under 'just joshing around'.
The sticks&stones chant is wrong: being constantly sledged in the workplace, for example, can drive people to suicide.
PC language training is quite similar to sexual consent training. You have to step into other peoples’ shoes, and understand that what seems harmless and apparently consensual to you is not so to them, if they feel powerless to object.
FYi, not being exposed to social media pile-ons much myself, at least one can disengage from that easily enough by using the off-switch, unless doxed.
And it happens in the other direction as well, see poorly chosen wording of Marama Davidson at Posie Parker debacle. And often with greater consequence for the speaker.
self isolating while useful in protecting oneself from bullying mobs, doesn't actually stop bullying mobs. On twitter for instance, someone using the off switch tends to give the mob a sense of power and they move on to the next one.
So Elmo is mask off, just blatantly giving n@zi salutes on live international tv. Super. Just fantastic. I couldn't enough to vomit as much as I would like.
Of course the apologists will be along soon to say that the guy who reinstated nazis on his platform, amplified nazi ideas and antisemitic conspiracies and endorsed the neo-nazi AfD was actually throwing a Bellamy salute.
Let’s not play into Seymour’s hands [20 Nov 2024]
The message against the coalition Treaty Principles Bill should be simple: the Treaty protects all New Zealanders from corporate exploitation
NAct MPs offering a tribute to their deity. Aotearoa New Zealand on sale – again
I think that an enquiry of the Stats. Department actions, set up and given its terms of reference by the Department, rather deserve the immortal comment by Mandy Rice-Davies when told that Lord Astor denied any affair with her said "Well he would, wouldn't he"
Of course this enquiry found a result that was what was wanted.
So lying for finical gain is all good with you alwyn?
Because you have a real case of missing the point here. Say what you want about the greens, labour, national, act or who ever. The point here though, is they lied for finical gain, with the bonus that it was a political hit job.
As such let me ask again – is lying for finical gain enough for you, for them to lose their tax free status or not? Which is the appropriate punishment for this type of crime.
Please tell me what crime you believe the Destiny Church has committed? And what evidence do you have for your claim? And who, exactly is supposed to have lied?
And before you do any of that. Answer the question I asked you.
Destiny Church in New Zealand lost its tax-free charity status in 2022. The Auckland Trust was removed from the Charities Register because it failed to file Annual Returns.
Yes, Destiny Church in New Zealand has charitable status with the Department of Internal Affairs. The Destiny International Trust, which is part of the Destiny International Group, is also registered as a charity.
Sounds like the usual ditch and restart musical chairs that the Companies Act allows for dropping debts in receivership and liquidations. Obviously the Charities Acts do as well.
I look for that practice when I am looking for 'legitimate' scam artists. Legal, but indicates an untrustworthy intent.
The report said allegations were made against Manurewa Marae from “whistleblowers” but the report does not go into details about the claims. The report refers this matter to the Privacy Commissioner.
In a separate report from Dr Rawiri Taonui, he said one of the whistleblowers was from Oranga Tamariki, another from the Ministry of Social Development, and four from Manurewa Marae, but none of them still work at the respective organisations. Taonui said they all had links to the Destiny Church.
That does read like standard dirty politics tactics. Probably legal. A waste of everyone's time.
Reports by “whistleblowers” in June 2023 revealed $100 kai vouchers were being given to whānau who completed a Census form.
The Stats NZ report confirms this was a contractual term in the signed agreement between Stats NZ and WOCA.
“Under the contract this was described as a ‘whānau contribution’ to encourage and support whānau to participate. The contract stated this ‘could include the use of grocery vouchers’.” Up to $1 million from the $5m contract could be set aside for incentives.
and
It also states: “By July 13, 2023, the engagement was deemed a success, with Stats NZ providing the Minister of Statistics with the following as part of a suggested response to a Parliamentary Question.
“Regarding achieved outcomes, I am advised that as of May 4, just before WOCA field activities began, Auckland North had an estimated individual return rate for the Māori descent population of 82%, with Auckland South at 64.7%.
“WOCA exceeded their target of reaching 10,000 non-responding and partially responding dwellings across Auckland, which contributed to an increase in return rates from Māori. As of June 30, 2023, the estimated individual return rate for the Māori descent population in Auckland North was 87.3%, and Auckland South was 70.3%.”
However as you implicitly point out, there is nothing unlawful in being a lying sack of shit, and there was no actual evidence that the Density Church are a cause of them being lying sacks of shit
I'd happily publish the names of the lying arseholes who just wasted a lot of taxpayers money time with what is pretty obviously a spurious claim released as part of a dirty politics move. Anyone know what their names are?
Your last paragraph illustrates why people may be very loath to come forward with a complaint.
"I'd happily publish the names of the lying arseholes who just wasted a lot of taxpayers money time with what is pretty obviously a spurious claim released as part of a dirty politics move. Anyone know what their names are?"
People who bring forward claims like this can sometimes suffer attacks that sound a bit like that. Is it any wonder that they are unwilling to speak up?
It may seem to you that it is "pretty obviously a spurious claim" but the people to whom it was made, and who required some sort of investigation don't appear to have been quite so sure.
Did you read this comment by MS about the time Cameron Slater tried to hack The Standard?
I'm no IT expert, but if that hack was successful your details could have been in the hands of an extremist vigilante who has dreams of being above the law. This was your guy doing the hacking, but still something for you to think about.
Well number one. It doesn't appear to have been a hack by anybody. It was a complaint by a number of people about activities that went on at the Manurewa marae.
Number two. It doesn't seem to have had anything to do with Cameron Slater.
Number three. What do you mean "your guy"? Why do you feel the need to smear me as well as the people who were whistle blowers by linking us all to Slater who appears, from what I have read about him, to be some sort of a creep.
The complaints appear to have been politically motivated because they were both complaints against an already approved process, and also complaints by people affiliated with Density Church, a political opponent of TPM.
You brought up the reluctance people might have in making complaints in a political environment. Just saying that we kind of do that here every time we comment and despite the pseudonyms and the burner emails we might employ, IP addresses are traceable to those who might want to use them. Cameron Slater is one of those people.
It's convenient you now distance yourself from Slater, but in reality he is your guy because you share politics with him. You always have.
Sure. But the counter argument is about spurious complaints that look like they have been essentially fabricated for political effect or for defamatory purposes – like these ones appear to have been. This clearly wasn’t whistle blowing. This was a deliberate attempt to spread misinformation. It is no different to what that sack of shit Cameron Slater was paid to do when he defamed Matthew Blomfield and others. Such actions should carry consequences.
The claims that I read in the news reports were
That the census collected data was being used for canvassing by the local TPM candidate.
That local TPM candidate via the organisation was ‘treating’.
Both are clearly refuted by this report. Both would have been criminal offences.
It was used for the contracted purpose – to increase uptake of Maori in the census. As contracted to Stats for the census- who ultimately provide the information that is used for the electoral bounds (mesh blocks).
I have never been in favour of whistle blowing being a pain-free activity, and in practice it usually often isn’t. Whistle blowing protections shouldn’t be there for deliberate malicious misinformation.
That should be treated exactly the same turning in a malicious complaint or report to the police – s24 of the Summary Offences Act
24 False allegation or report to Police
Every person is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months or a fine not exceeding $2,000 who,—
(a) contrary to the fact and without a belief in the truth of the statement, makes or causes to be made to any Police employee any written or verbal statement alleging that an offence has been committed; or
(b) with the intention of causing wasteful deployment, or of diverting deployment, of Police personnel or resources, or being reckless as to that result,—
(i) makes a statement to any person that gives rise to serious apprehension for his own safety or the safety of any person or property, knowing that the statement is false; or
(ii) behaves in a manner that is likely to give rise to such apprehension, knowing that such apprehension would be groundless.
People who bring forward claims like this can sometimes suffer attacks that sound a bit like that. Is it any wonder that they are unwilling to speak up?
Ok – so where exactly did these people make a ‘claim’ to? They apparently didn’t make it to any responsible authority. Not to the police. Not to the organisation. Not to the contracting agency – Stats. Not to a legal representative or a MP.
Perhaps you can enlighten us before making dickhead comments like that.
but the people to whom it was made,
So who were they? Did they make a complaint or report to a responsible authority? Enlighten me…. If I had to bet and based on the report, we’d find the the irresponsible arseholes who made these claims never went near anyone responsible.
It sounds like they or some activists that they talked to just leaked it to a journalist. Any triggering official complaint or whistle blowing was at least 3rd or 4th hand.
… and who required some sort of investigation don’t appear to have been quite so sure.
The people who required some investigation and who did it were the Stats department. Who it appears had never been contacts with these claims, but were a organisation who had a unsubstantiated accusation in the news
I can’t see how the claimants should have protection as a ‘whistle blower’. As far as I can see they acted without any responsibility based on nothing more than gossip.
Sure we have a legal avenue for dealing with that. But it is a civil case. In effect it is defamation – which is exactly what these irresponsible arseholes relied on. They didn’t make a claim to responsible authorities and get protected under whistle blower protections. They appear to have deliberately avoided criminal consequences and just lied to a reporter instead.
This is exactly the playbook of dirty politics. It is what Cameron Slater and Dermot Nottingham routinely did. What I think that Jordan Williams has done a lot of, most notably by betraying a friend. Sure it causes inordinate amounts of time in civil court. Frequently losing. It is why Slater and Nottingham have been bankrupted by court ordered costs and judgements.
It is dirty politics and doesn’t need whistle blower protections. What it needs is a law of malicious criminal defamation.
In the absence of that, public identification should be required. As far as I can tell, many of the people who make this style of irresponsible claims are serial offenders – certainly all of the ones I have ever looked at are. A public record would be a good deterrent against repeated spurious claims.
The Salvation Army’s State of the Nation report shows worsening food poverty and housing shortages mean more than 400,000 people now need welfare support, the highest level since the 1990s. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in our political economy around housing, climate and ...
You're just too too obscure for meOh you don't really get through to meAnd there's no need for you to talk that wayIs there any less pessimistic things to say?Songwriters: Graeme DownesToday, I thought we’d take a look at some of the most cringe-inducing moments from last week, but don’t ...
Please note: I’ve delayed my “What can we do?” article for this video.The video above shows Destiny Church members assaulting staff and librarians as they pushed through to a room of terrified parents and young children.It was posted to social media last night.But if you read Sinead Boucher’s Stuff, you ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is sea level rise exaggerated? Sea levels are rising at an accelerating rate, not stagnating or decreasing. Warming global temperatures cause land ice ...
Here is a scenario, but first a historical parallel. Hitler and the Nazis could well have accomplished everything that they wanted to do within German borders, including exterminating Jews, so long as they confined their ambitious to Germany itself. After all, the world pretty much sat and watched as the ...
I’ve spent the last couple of days in Hamilton covering Waikato University’s annual NZ Economics Forum, where (arguably) three of the most influential people in our political economy right now laid out their thinking in major speeches about the size and role of Government, their views on for spending, tax ...
Simeon Brown’s Ideology BentSimeon Brown once told Kiwis he tries to represent his deep sense of faith by interacting “with integrity”.“It’s important that there’s Christians in Parliament…and from my perspective, it’s great to be a Christian in Parliament and to bring that perspective to [laws, conversations and policies].”And with ...
Severe geological and financial earthquakes are inevitable. We just don’t know how soon and how they will play out. Are we putting the right effort into preparing for them?Every decade or so the international economy has a major financial crisis. We cannot predict exactly when or exactly how it will ...
Questions1. How did Old Mate Grabaseat describe his soon-to-be-Deputy-PM’s letter to police advocating for Philip Polkinghorne?a.Ill-advisedb.A perfect letterc.A letter that will live in infamyd.He had me at hello2. What did Seymour say in response?a.What’s ill-advised is commenting when you don’t know all the facts and ...
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff has called on OJI Fibre Solutions to work with the government, unions, and the community before closing the Kinleith Paper Mill. “OJI has today announced 230 job losses in what will be a devastating blow for the community. OJI needs to work with ...
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff is sounding the alarm about the latest attack on workers from Minister of Workplace Relations and Safety Brooke van Velden, who is ignoring her own officials to pursue reckless changes that would completely undermine the personal grievance system. “Brooke van Velden’s changes will ...
Hi,When I started writing Webworm in 2020, I wrote a lot about the conspiracy theories that were suddenly invading our Twitter timelines and Facebook feeds. Four years ago a reader, John, left this feedback under one of my essays:It’s a never ending labyrinth of lunacy which, as you have pointed ...
And if you said this life ain't good enoughI would give my world to lift you upI could change my life to better suit your moodBecause you're so smoothAnd it's just like the ocean under the moonOh, it's the same as the emotion that I get from youYou got the ...
Aotearoa remains the minority’s birthright, New Zealand the majority’s possession. WAITANGI DAY commentary see-saws manically between the warmly positive and the coldly negative. Many New Zealanders consider this a good thing. They point to the unexamined patriotism of July Fourth and Bastille Day celebrations, and applaud the fact that the ...
The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-hosts & talking about the week’s news with regular and special guests, including: and on the week in geopolitics, including the latest from Donald Trump’s administration over Gaza and Ukraine; on the ...
Up until now, the prevailing coalition view of public servants was that there were simply too many of them. But yesterday the new Public Service Commissioner, handpicked by the Luxon Government, said it was not so much numbers but what they did and the value they produced that mattered. Sir ...
In a moment we explore the question: What is Andrew Bayly wanting to tell ACC, and will it involve enjoying a small wine tasting and then telling someone to fuck off? But first, for context, a broader one: What do we look for in a government?Imagine for a moment, you ...
As expected, Donald Trump just threw Ukraine under the bus, demanding that it accept Russia's illegal theft of land, while ruling out any future membership of NATO. Its a colossal betrayal, which effectively legitimises Russia's invasion, while laying the groundwork for the next one. But Trump is apparently fine with ...
This is a guest post by George Weeks, reviewing a book called ‘How to Fly a Horse’ by Kevin AshtonBook review: ‘How to Fly a Horse’ by Kevin Ashton (2015) – and what it means for Auckland. The title of this article might unnerve any Greater Auckland ...
This story was originally published by Capital & Main and is part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story. Within just a week, the sheer devastation of the Los Angeles wildfires has pushed to the fore fundamental questions about the impact of the climate crisis that have been ...
In this world, it's just usYou know it's not the same as it wasSongwriters: Harry Edward Styles / Thomas Edward Percy Hull / Tyler Sam JohnsonYesterday, I received a lovely message from Caty, a reader of Nick’s Kōrero, that got me thinking. So I thought I’d share it with you, ...
In past times a person was considered “unserious” or “not a serious” person if they failed to grasp, behave and speak according to the solemnity of the context in which they were located. For example a serious person does not audibly pass gas at Church, or yell “gun” at a ...
Long stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, February 13 are:The coalition Government’s early 2024 ‘fiscal emergency’ freeze on funding, planning and building houses, schools, local roads and hospitals helped extend and deepen the economic and jobs recession through calendar ...
For obvious reasons, people feel uneasy when the right to be a citizen is sold off to wealthy foreigners. Even selling the right to residency seems a bit dubious, when so many migrants who are not millionaires get turned away or are made to jump through innumerable hoops – simply ...
A new season of White Lotus is nearly upon us: more murder mystery, more sumptuous surroundings, more rich people behaving badly.Once more we get to identify with the experience of the pampered tourist or perhaps the poorly paid help; there's something in White Lotus for all New Zealanders.And unlike the ...
In 2016, Aotearoa shockingly plunged to fourth place in the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index. Nine years later, and we're back there again: New Zealand has seen a further slip in its global ranking in the latest Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). [...] In the latest CPI New Zealand's score ...
1. You’ve started ranking your politicians on how much they respect the rule of law2. You’ve stopped paying attention to those news publications3. You’ve developed a sudden interest in a particular period of history4. More and more people are sounding like your racist, conspiracist uncle.5. Someone just pulled a Nazi ...
Transforming New Zealand: Brian EastonBrian Easton will discuss the above topic at 2/57 Willis Street, Wellington at 5:30pm on Tuesday 26 February at 2/57 Willis Street, WellingtonThe sub-title to the above is "Why is the Left failing?" Brian Easton's analysis is based on his view that while the ...
Salvation Army’s State of the Nation 2025 report highlights falling living standards, the highest unemployment rates since the 1990s and half of all Pacific children going without food. There are reports of hundreds if not thousands of people are applying for the same jobs in the wake of last year’s ...
Mountain Tui is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Correction: On the article The Condundrum of David Seymour, Luke Malpass conducted joint reviews with Bryce Wilkinson, the architect of the Regulatory Standards Bill - not Bryce Edwards. The article ...
Tomorrow the council’s Transport, Resilience and Infrastructure Committee meet and agenda has a few interesting papers. Council’s Letter of Expectation to Auckland Transport Every year the council provide a Letter of Expectation to Auckland Transport which is part of the process for informing AT of the council’s priorities and ...
All around in my home townThey're trying to track me down, yeahThey say they want to bring me in guiltyFor the killing of a deputyFor the life of a deputySongwriter: Robert Nesta Marley.Support Nick’s Kōrero today with a 20% discount on a paid subscription to receive all my newsletters directly ...
Hi,I think all of us have probably experienced the power of music — that strange, transformative thing that gets under our skin and helps us experience this whole life thing with some kind of sanity.Listening and experiencing music has always been such a huge part of my life, and has ...
Business frustration over the stalled economy is growing, and only 34% of voters are confidentNicola Willis can deliver. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Wednesday, February 12 are:Business frustration is growing about a ...
I have now lived long enough to see a cabinet minister go both barrels on their Prime Minister and not get sacked.It used to be that the PM would have a drawer full of resignations signed by ministers on the day of their appointment, ready for such an occasion. But ...
This session will feature Simon McCallum, Senior Lecturer in Engineering and Computer Science (VUW) and recent Labour Party candidate in the Southland Electorate talking about some of the issues around AI and how this should inform Labour Party policy. Simon is an excellent speaker with a comprehensive command of AI ...
The proposed Waimate garbage incinerator is dead: The company behind a highly-controversial proposal to build a waste-to-energy plant in the Waimate District no longer has the land. [...] However, SIRRL director Paul Taylor said the sales and purchase agreement to purchase land from Murphy Farms, near Glenavy, lapsed at ...
The US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act has been a vital tool in combatting international corruption. It forbids US companies and citizens from bribing foreign public officials anywhere in the world. And its actually enforced: some of the world's biggest companies - Siemens, Hewlett Packard, and Bristol Myers Squibb - have ...
December 2024 photo - with UK Tory Boris Johnson (Source: Facebook)Those PollsFor hours, political poll results have resounded across political hallways and commentary.According to the 1News Verizon poll, 50% of the country believe we are heading in the “wrong direction”, while 39% believe we are “on the right track”.The left ...
A Tai Rāwhiti mill that ran for 30 years before it was shut down in late 2023 is set to re-open in the coming months, which will eventually see nearly 300 new jobs in the region. A new report from Massey University shows that pensioners are struggling with rising costs. ...
As support continues to fall, Luxon also now faces his biggest internal ructions within the coalition since the election, with David Seymour reacting badly to being criticised by the PM. File photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate ...
Not since 1988 when Richard Prebble openly criticised David Lange have we seen such a challenge to a Prime Minister as that of David Seymour to Christopher Luxon last night. Prebble suggested Lange had mental health issues during a TV interview and was almost immediately fired. Seymour hasn’t gone quite ...
Three weeks in, and the 24/7 news cycle is not helping anyone feel calm and informed about the second Trump presidency. One day, the US is threatening 25% trade tariffs on its friends and neighbours. The reasons offered by the White House are absurd, such as stopping fentanyl coming in ...
This video includes personal musings and conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Adam Levy. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). Wherever you look, you'll hear headlines claiming we've passed 1.5 degrees of global warming. And while 2024 saw ...
Photo by Heather M. Edwards on UnsplashHere’s the key news, commentary, reports and debate around Aotearoa’s politics and economy in the week to Feb 10 below. That’s ahead of live chats on the Substack App and The Kākā’s front page on Substack at 5pm with: on his column in The ...
Is there anyone in the world the National Party loves more than a campaign donor? Why yes, there is! They will always have the warmest hello and would you like to slip into something more comfortable for that great god of our age, the High Net Worth Individual.The words the ...
Waste and fraud certainly exist in foreign aid programs, but rightwing celebration of USAID’s dismantling shows profound ignorance of the value of soft power (as opposed to hard power) in projecting US influence and interests abroad by non-military/coercive means (think of “hearts and minds,” “hugs, not bullets,” “honey versus vinegar,” ...
Health New Zealand is proposing to cut almost half of its data and digital positions – more than 1000 of them. The PSA has called on the Privacy Commissioner to urgently investigate the cuts due to the potential for serious consequences for patients. NZNO is calling for an urgent increase ...
We may see a few more luxury cars on Queen Street, but a loosening of rules to entice rich foreigners to invest more here is unlikely to “turbocharge our economic growth”. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate ...
Let us not dance daintily around the elephant in the room. Our politicians who serve us in the present are not honest, certainly not as honest as they should be, and while the right are taking out most of the trophies for warping narratives and literally redefining “facts”, the kiwi ...
A few weeks ago I took a look at public transport ridership in 2024. In today’s post I’m going to be looking a bit deeper at bus ridership. Buses make up the vast majority of ridership in Auckland with 70 million boardings last year out of a total of 89.4 ...
Oh, you know I did itIt's over and I feel fineNothing you could say is gonna change my mindWaited and I waited the longest nightNothing like the taste of sweet declineSongwriters: Chris Shiflett / David Eric Grohl / Nate Mendel / Taylor Hawkins.Hindsight is good, eh?The clarity when the pieces ...
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on UnsplashHere’s what we’re watching in the week to February 16 and beyond in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty:Monday, February 10The Kākā’s weekly wrap-up of news about politics and the economy is due at midday, followed by webinar for paying subscribers in Substack’s ...
A listing of 23 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, February 2, 2025 thru Sat, February 8, 2025. This week's roundup is again published soleley by category. We are still interested in feedback to hone the categorization, so if ...
Today, I stumbled across a Twitter Meme: the ending of The Lord of the Rings as a Chess scenario: https://x.com/mellon_heads/status/1887983845917564991 It gets across the basic gist. Aragorn and Gandalf offering up ‘material’ at the Morannon allows Frodo and Samwise to catch Sauron unawares – fair enough. But there are a ...
Last week, Kieran McAnulty called out Chris Bishop and Nicola Willis for their claims that Kāinga Ora’s costs were too high.They had claimed Kāinga Ora’s cost were 12% higher than market i.e. private devlopersBut Kāinga Ora’s Chair had already explained why last year:"We're not building to sell, so we'll be ...
Stuff’s Political Editor Luke Malpass - A Fellow at New Zealand IniativeLast week I half-joked that Stuff / The Post’s Luke Malpass1 always sounded like he was auditioning for a job at the New Zealand Initiative.Mountain Tui is a reader-supported publication. For a limited time, subscriptions are 20% off. Thanks ...
At a funeral on Friday, there were A4-sized photos covering every wall of the Dil’s reception lounge. There must have been 200 of them, telling the story in the usual way of the video reel but also, by enlargement, making it more possible to linger and step in.Our friend Nicky ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park from the Gigafact team in collaboration with members from our team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is methane the ...
The Government’s idea is that the private sector and Community Housing Providers will fund, build and operate new affordable housing to address our housing crisis. Meanwhile, the Government does not know where almost half of the 1,700 children who left emergency housing actually went. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong ...
Oh, home, let me come homeHome is wherever I'm with youOh, home, let me come homeHome is wherever I'm with youSongwriters: Alexander Ebert / Jade Allyson CastrinosMorena,I’m on a tight time frame this morning. In about an hour and a half, I’ll need to pack up and hit the road ...
This is a post about the Mountain Tui substack, and small tweaks - further to the poll and request post the other day. Please don’t read if you aren’t interested in my personal matters. Thank you all.After oohing-and-aahing about how to structure the Substack model since November, including obtaining ...
This transcript of a recent conversation between the Prime Minister and his chief economic adviser has not been verified.We’ve announced we are the ‘Yes Government’. Do you like it?Yes, Prime Minister.Dreamed up by the PR team. It’s about being committed to growth. Not that the PR team know anything about ...
The other day, Australian Senator Nick McKim issued a warning in the Australian Parliement about the US’s descent into fascim.And of course it’s true, but I lament - that was true as soon as Trump won.What we see is now simply the reification of the intention, planning, and forces behind ...
Among the many other problems associated with Musk/DOGE sending a fleet of teenage and twenty-something cultists to remove, copy and appropriate federal records like social security, medicaid and other supposedly protected data is the fact that the youngsters doing the data-removal, copying and security protocol and filter code over-writing have ...
Jokerman dance to the nightingale tuneBird fly high by the light of the moonOh, oh, oh, JokermanSong by Bob Dylan.Morena folks, I hope this fine morning of the 7th of February finds you well. We're still close to Paihia, just a short drive out of town. Below is the view ...
It’s been an eventful week as always, so here’s a few things that we have found interesting. We also hope everyone had a happy and relaxing Waitangi Day! This week in Greater Auckland We’re still running on summer time, but provided two chewy posts: On Tuesday, a guest ...
Queuing on Queen St: the Government is set to announce another apparently splashy growth policy on Sunday of offering residence visas to wealthy migrants. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in our political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Friday, February 7:PM Christopher ...
The fact that Waitangi ended up being such a low-key affair may mark it out as one of the most significant Waitangi Days in recent years. A group of women draped in “Toitu Te Tiriti” banners who turned their backs on the politicians’ powhiri was about as rough as it ...
National’s cuts to disability support funding and freezing of new residential placements has resulted in significant mental health decline for intellectually disabled people. ...
The hundreds of jobs lost needlessly as a result of the Kinleith Mill paper production closure will have a devastating impact on the Tokoroa community - something that could have easily been avoided. ...
Today Te Pāti Māori MP for Te Tai Tokerau, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, released her members bill that will see the return of tamariki and mokopuna Māori from state care back to te iwi Māori. This bill will establish an independent authority that asserts and protects the rights promised in He Whakaputanga ...
The Whangarei District Council being forced to fluoridate their local water supply is facing a despotic Soviet-era disgrace. This is not a matter of being pro-fluoride or anti-fluoride. It is a matter of what New Zealanders see and value as democracy in our country. Individual democratically elected Councillors are not ...
Nicola Willis’ latest supermarket announcement is painfully weak with no new ideas, no real plan, and no relief for Kiwis struggling with rising grocery costs. ...
Half of Pacific children sometimes going without food is just one of many heartbreaking lowlights in the Salvation Army’s annual State of the Nation report. ...
The Salvation Army’s State of the Nation report is a bleak indictment on the failure of Government to take steps to end poverty, with those on benefits, including their children, hit hardest. ...
New Zealand First has today introduced a Member’s Bill which would restore decision-making power to local communities regarding the fluoridation of drinking water. The ‘Fluoridation (Referendum) Legislation Bill’ seeks to repeal the Health (Fluoridation of Drinking Water) Amendment Act 2021 that granted centralised authority to the Direct General of Health ...
New Zealand First has introduced a Member’s Bill aimed at preventing banks from refusing their services to businesses because of the current “Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Framework”. “This Bill ensures fairness and prevents ESG standards from perpetuating woke ideology in the banking sector being driven by unelected, globalist, climate ...
Erica Stanford has reached peak shortsightedness if today’s announcement is anything to go by, picking apart immigration settings piece by piece to the detriment of the New Zealand economy. ...
Our originating document, theTreaty of Waitangi, was signed on February 6, 1840. An agreement between Māori and the British Crown. Initially inked by Ngā Puhi in Waitangi, further signatures were added as it travelled south. The intention was to establish a colony with the cession of sovereignty to the Crown, ...
Te Whatu Ora Chief Executive Margie Apa leaving her job four months early is another symptom of this government’s failure to deliver healthcare for New Zealanders. ...
The Green Party is calling for the Prime Minister to show leadership and be unequivocal about Aotearoa New Zealand’s opposition to a proposal by the US President to remove Palestinians from Gaza. ...
The latest unemployment figures reveal that job losses are hitting Māori and Pacific people especially hard, with Māori unemployment reaching a staggering 9.7% for the December 2024 quarter and Pasifika unemployment reaching 10.5%. ...
Waitangi 2025: Waitangi Day must be community and not politically driven - Shane Jones Our originating document, theTreaty of Waitangi, was signed on February 6, 1840. An agreement between Māori and the British Crown. Initially inked by Ngā Puhi in Waitangi, further signatures were added as it travelled south. ...
Despite being confronted every day with people in genuine need being stopped from accessing emergency housing – National still won’t commit to building more public houses. ...
The Green Party says the Government is giving up on growing the country’s public housing stock, despite overwhelming evidence that we need more affordable houses to solve the housing crisis. ...
Before any thoughts of the New Year and what lies ahead could even be contemplated, New Zealand reeled with the tragedy of Senior Sergeant Lyn Fleming losing her life. For over 38 years she had faithfully served as a front-line Police officer. Working alongside her was Senior Sergeant Adam Ramsay ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson will return to politics at Waitangi on Monday the 3rd of February where she will hold a stand up with fellow co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick. ...
Te Pāti Māori is appalled by the government's blatant mishandling of the school lunch programme. David Seymour’s ‘cost-saving’ measures have left tamariki across Aotearoa with unidentifiable meals, causing distress and outrage among parents and communities alike. “What’s the difference between providing inedible food, and providing no food at all?” Said ...
The Government is doubling down on outdated and volatile fossil fuels, showing how shortsighted and destructive their policies are for working New Zealanders. ...
Green Party MP Steve Abel this morning joined Coromandel locals in Waihi to condemn new mining plans announced by Shane Jones in the pit of the town’s Australian-owned Gold mine. ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to strengthen its just-announced 2030-2035 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement and address its woeful lack of commitment to climate security. ...
Today marks a historic moment for Taranaki iwi with the passing of the Te Pire Whakatupua mō Te Kāhui Tupua/Taranaki Maunga Collective Redress Bill in Parliament. "Today, we stand together as descendants of Taranaki, and our tūpuna, Taranaki Maunga, is now formally acknowledged by the law as a living tūpuna. ...
Labour is relieved to see Children’s Minister Karen Chhour has woken up to reality and reversed her government’s terrible decisions to cut funding from frontline service providers – temporarily. ...
It is the first week of David Seymour’s school lunch programme and already social media reports are circulating of revolting meals, late deliveries, and mislabelled packaging. ...
The Green Party says that with no-cause evictions returning from today, the move to allow landlords to end tenancies without reason plunges renters, and particularly families who rent, into insecurity and stress. ...
The Government’s commitment to get New Zealand’s roads back on track is delivering strong results, with around 98 per cent of potholes on state highways repaired within 24 hours of identification every month since targets were introduced, Transport Minister Chris Bishop says. “Increasing productivity to help rebuild our economy is ...
The former Cadbury factory will be the site of the Inpatient Building for the new Dunedin Hospital and Health Minister Simeon Brown says actions have been taken to get the cost overruns under control. “Today I am giving the people of Dunedin certainty that we will build the new Dunedin ...
From today, Plunket in Whāngarei will be offering childhood immunisations – the first of up to 27 sites nationwide, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. The investment of $1 million into the pilot, announced in October 2024, was made possible due to the Government’s record $16.68 billion investment in health. It ...
New Zealand’s strong commitment to the rights of disabled people has continued with the response to an important United Nations report, Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston has announced. Of the 63 concluding observations of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), 47 will be progressed ...
Resources Minister Shane Jones has launched New Zealand’s national Minerals Strategy and Critical Minerals List, documents that lay a strategic and enduring path for the mineral sector, with the aim of doubling exports to $3 billion by 2035. Mr Jones released the documents, which present the Coalition Government’s transformative vision ...
Firstly I want to thank OceanaGold for hosting our event today. Your operation at Waihi is impressive. I want to acknowledge local MP Scott Simpson, local government dignitaries, community stakeholders and all of you who have gathered here today. It’s a privilege to welcome you to the launch of the ...
Racing Minister, Winston Peters has announced the Government is preparing public consultation on GST policy proposals which would make the New Zealand racing industry more competitive. “The racing industry makes an important economic contribution. New Zealand thoroughbreds are in demand overseas as racehorses and for breeding. The domestic thoroughbred industry ...
Business confidence remains very high and shows the economy is on track to improve, Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis says. “The latest ANZ Business Outlook survey, released yesterday, shows business confidence and expected own activity are ‘still both very high’.” The survey reports business confidence fell eight points to +54 ...
Enabling works have begun this week on an expanded radiology unit at Hawke’s Bay Fallen Soldiers’ Memorial Hospital which will double CT scanning capacity in Hawke’s Bay to ensure more locals can benefit from access to timely, quality healthcare, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. This investment of $29.3m in the ...
The Government has today announced New Zealand’s second international climate target under the Paris Agreement, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand will reduce emissions by 51 to 55 per cent compared to 2005 levels, by 2035. “We have worked hard to set a target that is both ambitious ...
Nine years of negotiations between the Crown and iwi of Taranaki have concluded following Te Pire Whakatupua mō Te Kāhui Tupua/the Taranaki Maunga Collective Redress Bill passing its third reading in Parliament today, Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “This Bill addresses the historical grievances endured by the eight iwi ...
As schools start back for 2025, there will be a relentless focus on teaching the basics brilliantly so all Kiwi kids grow up with the knowledge, skills and competencies needed to grow the New Zealand of the future, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. “A world-leading education system is a key ...
Housing Minister Chris Bishop and Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson have welcomed Kāinga Ora’s decision to re-open its tender for carpets to allow wool carpet suppliers to bid. “In 2024 Kāinga Ora issued requests for tender (RFTs) seeking bids from suppliers to carpet their properties,” Mr Bishop says. “As part ...
Associate Education Minister David Seymour has today visited Otahuhu College where the new school lunch programme has served up healthy lunches to students in the first days of the school year. “As schools open in 2025, the programme will deliver nutritious meals to around 242,000 students, every school day. On ...
Minister for Children Karen Chhour has intervened in Oranga Tamariki’s review of social service provider contracts to ensure Barnardos can continue to deliver its 0800 What’s Up hotline. “When I found out about the potential impact to this service, I asked Oranga Tamariki for an explanation. Based on the information ...
A bill to make revenue collection on imported and exported goods fairer and more effective had its first reading in Parliament, Customs Minister Casey Costello said today. “The Customs (Levies and Other Matters) Amendment Bill modernises the way in which Customs can recover the costs of services that are needed ...
Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says the Department of Internal Affairs [the Department] has achieved significant progress in completing applications for New Zealand citizenship. “December 2024 saw the Department complete 5,661 citizenship applications, the most for any month in 2024. This is a 54 per cent increase compared ...
Reversals to Labour’s blanket speed limit reductions begin tonight and will be in place by 1 July, says Minister of Transport Chris Bishop. “The previous government was obsessed with slowing New Zealanders down by imposing illogical and untargeted speed limit reductions on state highways and local roads. “National campaigned on ...
Finance Minister Nicola Willis has announced Budget 2025 – the Growth Budget - will be delivered on Thursday 22 May. “This year’s Budget will drive forward the Government’s plan to grow our economy to improve the incomes of New Zealanders now and in the years ahead. “Budget 2025 will build ...
For the Government, 2025 will bring a relentless focus on unleashing the growth we need to lift incomes, strengthen local businesses and create opportunity. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon today laid out the Government’s growth agenda in his Statement to Parliament. “Just over a year ago this Government was elected by ...
Associate Education Minister David Seymour welcomes students back to school with a call to raise attendance from last year. “The Government encourages all students to attend school every day because there is a clear connection between being present at school and setting yourself up for a bright future,” says Mr ...
The Government is relaxing visitor visa requirements to allow tourists to work remotely while visiting New Zealand, Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis, Immigration Minister Erica Stanford and Tourism Minister Louise Upston say. “The change is part of the Government’s plan to unlock New Zealand’s potential by shifting the country onto ...
Hundreds of engineers are losing their jobs and leaving our shores due to infrastructure project delays, creating "significant" risk to our nation's development, says the head of New Zealand's engineering body. ...
By Caleb Fotheringham, RNZ Pacific journalist Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown says the deal with China “complements, not replaces” the relationship with New Zealand after signing it yesterday. Brown said “The Action Plan for Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP) 2025-2030” provides a structured framework for engagement between the Cook Islands ...
The government should not set military style academies into youth justice law, the children's commissioner says, despite its first bootcamp getting a glowing report. ...
The infamous over-the-suit T-shirt worn by the PM at a Parliament barbecue has gone on sale to raise funds for children living in poverty, in a TradeMe auction. ...
MONDAYSheriff Seymour rode slowly down the main street of Dodge on his faithful white horse Atlas Network.He liked what he saw.Children were being fed free lunches prepared by kind people who collected the scraps from an offal rendering plant.“Very strongly flavoured liver, such as ox liver, can be soaked overnight ...
Once upon a time it was all about being an astronaut, a firefighter or doctor; but these days kids have their sights set on becoming vloggers or YouTubers.That’s according to a 2019 study by Lego that surveyed 3000 children between the ages of eight to 12 from the US, the ...
Madeleine Chapman reflects on the week that was. From the moment I started high school and realised almost every other girl in my year was at least partially interested in what the boys were up to, I realised that I would be single for life. The feeling wasn’t one of ...
The Pacific profiles series shines a light on Pacific people in Aotearoa doing interesting and important work in their communities, as nominated by members of the public. Today, Selina Alesana Alefosio.All photos by Geoffery Matautia.On a bright Sunday morning from her grandparent’s home in Pito-one, I spoke with ...
The White Lotus star reflects on her life in TV, including the local ad reference that doesn’t work in Australia, and her bananas co-star on Neighbours.Morgana O’Reilly was scrolling her phone next to her sleeping son on an idle Saturday morning when she got the call confirming that she ...
Claire Mabey explores the pros and cons of puff quotes on book covers.In January, Publishers Weekly put out an article by Sean Manning – publisher of Simon & Schuster’s flagship US imprint – in which he said he’d “no longer require authors to obtain blurbs for their books”.The ...
New Zealand’s Entomological Society is hosting its annual bug of the year contest. Here are some of the insects in the running. For some reason – perhaps humans’ inherent competitiveness, the idealisation of democracy, the need to demarcate winners and losers – one of the best ways to get people ...
A journey along the border, with words and illustrations by Bob Kerr.The Spinoff Essay showcases the best essayists in Aotearoa, on topics big and small. Made possible by the generous support of our members.The Sunset Limited leaves Union Station New Orleans on time at nine in the morning. We ...
Neville Peat is the 2024 recipient of the Prime Minister’s Award for Literary Achievement in nonfiction. He’s written 56 books, mostly on natural history; this excerpt is from The Falcon and the Lark: A New Zealand High Country Journal, first published in 1992. The falcon wintering on the Rock and ...
It was a light-hearted gesture Greta Pilkington will be forever grateful for – thanks to an Aussie rival who jumped in when the Olympic sailor couldn’t be at her own graduation.Pilkington, then 20, had been leading a double life – while qualifying for the 2024 Paris Olympics in the ILCA ...
I was born in the back of my grandfather’s ute, by an overgrown windbreak in a remote place called Wahi-Rakauyou can’t find on a map. I was born a girl but given the man’s name Harvey, as my dad always wanted a violent-minded boy to one day help him ...
“We’re not here to interfere in people’s property rights,” Ngāi Tahu’s Te Maire Tau has told the High Court.Tau, a historian, Upoko (traditional leader) of Ngāi Tūāhuriri, and a university professor of history, is the lead witness in a case designed to force the Crown to recognise the tribe’s rangatiratanga ...
Pacific Media Watch Trump administration officials barred two Associated Press (AP) reporters from covering White House events this week because the US-based independent news agency did not change its style guide to align with the president’s political agenda. The AP is being punished for using the term “Gulf of Mexico,” ...
By Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific Presenter/Bulletin editor France’s top diplomat in the Pacific region says talks around the “unfreezing” of New Caledonia’s highly controversial electoral roll are back on the table. The French government intended to make a constitutional amendment that would lift restrictions prescribed under the Nouméa Accord, which ...
By bringing these global voices to the fight for free expression in New Zealand, we’ll continue to protect and expand our culture of free speech, says Nathan Seiuli, the Free Speech Union's Events Manager. ...
The issue is no longer a hypothetical one. US President Donald Trump will not explicitly suggest death camps, but he has already consented to Israel’s continuing a war that is not a war but rather a barbaric assault on a desolate stretch of land. From there, the road to annihilation is ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Cecelia Cmielewski, Research Fellow, Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney University To be selected as the artist and curator team to represent Australia at the Venice Biennale is considered the ultimate exhibition for an artistic team. To have your selection rescinded, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Steve Turton, Adjunct Professor of Environmental Geography, CQUniversity Australia Severe Tropical Cyclone Zelia is bearing down on the northwest coast of Australia and is likely to make landfall early Friday evening. It’s a monster storm of great concern to Western Australia. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Danielle Ireland-Piper, Associate Professor, ANU National Security College, Australian National University A Victorian government decision to allow dingo culling in the state’s east until 2028 has reignited debate over what has been dubbed Australia’s most controversial animal. Animals Australia, an animal welfare ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hassan Vally, Associate Professor, Epidemiology, Deakin University Overnight, Robert F. Kennedy Jr was confirmed as the secretary of the US Health and Human Services Department. Put simply, this makes him the most influential figure in overseeing the health and wellbeing of more ...
Everything you missed from day five of the Treaty principles bill hearings, when the Justice Committee heard eight hours of submissions.Read our recaps of the previous hearings here.It was another work from home day for the Justice Committee, the only people in Room 3 being security guards, committee ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Milad Haghani, Associate Professor & Principal Fellow in Urban Risk & Resilience, The University of Melbourne Juris Teivans/Shutterstock In Australia, fatal road crashes are climbing again, especially since the pandemic, and despite years of attempts to reduce road trauma, the numbers ...
In its eagerness to appease supporters of Israel, the media is happy to ride roughshod over due process and basic rights. It’s damaging Australia’s (and New Zealand’s?) democracy.COMMENTARY:By Bernard Keane Two moments stand out so far from the Federal Court hearings relating to Antoinette Lattouf’s sacking by the ...
ME: Credit where credit’s due. The appointment of a minister for the South Island is a really great move!
FRIEND: How so?
ME: Well, he’s a Minister, he’ll advocate strongly for the South Island. Think about it, now we’ll get a complete Dunedin Hospital rebuild, now we’ll get modern, up to date ferries, and by 2026, now Nelson hospital will get . . .
FRIEND: Hold on, hold on. How’s this mearger man going to achieve all this?
ME: He’s a Minister, he’ll have a say . . .
FRIEND: But he’s not in Cabinet! He’ll have no say in any decisions made!
ME: What, he’s not in Cabinet? Then WTF use is he to anyone?
FRIEND: Perhaps he’s just a PR exercise! Y'know, window dressing to make it appear the CoC even knows where the South Island is!
Excellent TV.
Given that a large chunk of south islanders would hate them Māori s have wards and special seats I reckon it's just national sucking up to there base , hypocrisy rite large!
Gee. Nice generalisation there. Thanks.
Large chunk doesn't mean all
I would prefer that every region defined by a Regional Council boundary had 1 MP in Parliament.
Regional representation would be better than this half-assed approach, and because it represented governance boundaries it would also be better than Maori seats.
how would that change the NI/SI ratio?
Depends on how it would change the number of List seats.
If you subtracted them off List seats it would at least give 11 Regional MPs something useful to do, namely to represent the needs of Regions and Councils,
It's got to be a topic for a pre-2040 constitutional discussion.
I'd go further and have rural seats stop at the 50 kmph sign of rural towns , different electorate for vastly different needs
sounds true. Same with the hunting and fishing minister. My guess, these are Peters' ideas, because he knows how to ensure his next election victory.
The final dangerous act of a senile old fruit and nut case.
Preemptive pardons, what the hell is that?
To protect his family and associates and senior Justice officials and politicians from Trump's threatened illegal unconstitutional acts of vengeance, outgoing US President Joe Biden has issued preemptive pardons for those in the political elite who have been threatened by Trump.
Of all the American democratic institutions and legal and justice systems being targeted by Trump, America's political elites are the best able to defend, themselves, publicly and in court.
To protect his own, the American justice and democratic institutions has been short circuited by Joe Biden.
As Biden and his family and associates clamber aboard a presidential pardon lifeboat, Biden's message to Americans is clear, 'You are on your own'
By pre-emptively removing themselves from the front line of Trump's unconstitutional attacks, Biden has invited attack on every other American institution and civil society organisation next on Trump's hit list..
At the very least this doddery old fool makes these law makers and government officials he has pardoned look guilty, (of something). This is raw meat to Trump's feral base that feed off conspiracy theories.
A genuine democratic leader with faith in the system would have challenged Trump to do his worst, and instead of short circuiting the system, relied on the American democratic institutions and legal system of checks and balances backed up by the American constitution to defend against Trump's attacks. For the political elite shielded by these pardons, the chance to defend themselves and their actions in court and in public, as they are able to do, more than most, has been lost.
Denying Trump's detractors and accusers their chance to be vindicated in the eyes of the public and on the record and by history, is a gutless surrender to Trump, and another monumental failure by the Biden administration. Possibly to be proved one of their worst.
You give pardons after someone has been tried and found guilty, not before.
Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Preemptive pardons presumes preemptive guilt.
A presidential pardon is supposed to be a show of mercy granted to the convicted and not a determination of guilt or innocence.
Finally; What sort of precedent is this setting for Trump?. to preemptively pardon himself for crimes he hasn't committed yet?
Surely the far centre extremists trying to protect themselves at everyone' else's expense are the hand maidens of the far right.
Wonder why?
https://x.com/SawyerHackett/status/1881437127889793099
That is not a Nazi salute
Check it out , the palm is not downward and the arm should be directly in front , and if you were emulating Hitler , at a lower angle
We have a new kind of oligarchic fascism ahead of us and it pays to be alert, not fall back on worn out tropes
Ok, we'll take some points off for form, but I'm pretty sure the rest of us know a dog whistle with deniable culpability when we see one.
And this is some obscure goth font that just happens to resemble fraktur, right?
/
https://www.msn.com/en-in/lifestyle/whats-hot/did-elon-musk-wear-a-maga-hat-with-nazi-font-at-a-trump-rally/ar-AA1t6WcM
Because Trump has said he will pursue those who did things that he personally disapproved of. I think it's an astute political move. It underlines the hijacking of proper judicial process that happens when Trump openly says he'll force legal proceedings to hunt his 'enemies'.
Well there's one thing: however far Mr Biden's actions may have strayed outside of "due process" (whatever that might be, now), he can't be charged with anything – the SCOTUS sez so.
I think Biden is being more cowardly and self serving than astute.
What about all the people Trump will go after that Biden hasn't given preemptive pardons to?
Rather than go through the proper legal channels to fight Trump's persecution of top officials, (on behalf of everyone else, especially those who will be next), Biden takes the coward's way out.
In 2020 Joe Biden said that preemptive pardons "set a horrible precedent"
From the Jake Tapper Transcript:
Overlooking Biden's sheer hypocrisy, if Biden has no confidence in the US legal and justice system to protect his family members or even justice department officials, how confident in the US legal and justice system can anyone else be, targeted by Trump and not protected by a preemptive pardon?
If the leadership won't stand up to defend themselves, the very least this will do is have is a chilling effect on the rest of the civil administration officials not protected by pardons to stand up to whatever excesses and abuse of civil liberties Trump has in mind
It was getting a bit late, in 2020 to be talking about preemptive pardons where there was no identified crime having been committed as setting some sort of precedent.
After all, the greatest of all US Presidents, Lincoln offered pardons to any member of the Confederacy and restoration of all their rights, except for the ownership of slaves to anyone who would swear an oath of allegiance to the United States. This was part of Lincoln's plans for the future of the South after the war and Congress wouldn't go along with them.
Then, on Christmas Day 1968 Lincoln's successor Andrew Johnson pardoned every soldier who had served in the Confederate forces. He could do it and he did. How about that for a pre-emptive strike.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/25/this-day-in-politics-dec-25-1868-1074077
"Everyone else" is utterly irrelevant.
Trump will avenge against Biden as the true antichrist Trump believes he is.
In 6 months people like you will wonder how far and fast Trump brings this world down.
Totally agree Jenny
It's now carte blanche for Trump and a further weakening of due process
So disagree.
We can go on all day about how the law is always right and useful.
Actually between Biden and Trump what they should have done is pardoned the entire lot who invaded the capital on July 6th, as well as all those who examined the breakdown afterwards.
There is now simply too much division within the United States to just keep jailing people for everything around January 6th whether you are Democrat or Republican.
Pretty much the same applies to New Zealand, and all the people that invaded the Parliament grounds.
A good NZ bipartisan review would say that the GG should pardon all those who were charged and convicted in Wellington as well. Those massive state interventions in vaccine mandates may have felt justified at the time, but in this cold light of day they were a massive overreach of state power.
Punishment is just endless in this case and the nations won't heal.
Have you read the Phase One report of the NZ Royal Commission COVID-19 Lessons Learned?
Yes.
Clearly not deeply enough.
Agreed, if Biden had any sense he would of pardoned Trump for crimes relating to his presidency instead of eventually starting investigations and various court cases.
Would have likely meant that Trump slowly faded from the headlines and I suspect wouldnt have run again. Instead the court cases provided a platform and the motivation given winning the election was the only way to save himself.
His claimed he won the election in 2020, then used of money from supporters to favour GOP loyalists over rivals. This was to maintain his control over the party and win the nomination for 2024.
Not the path of someone who was going away.
An overreach because of the backlash and political fallout, or an overreach because it's just fundamentally wrong for the state to do such a thing?
At this point under Luxon it doesn't matter.
Ad @ 2.4
Bullshit! The govt. of the day saved thousands of lives or maybe you don't think that should have been a priority. We only did the same as almost every other country in the world with the partial exception of Trump's America and look what a massive cost in lives they paid.
Maybe you believe no country should have used mandatory isolation rules, leading to a global figure of a billion plus lives lost.
Um we did very different things to many countries. Sweden, Japan and plenty of others.
The mandates did very little apart from drive a big enough wedge in society that we have the current govt. They were a nonsense couldn't work plenty of jobs due to risk but could go and stand in line at the supermarket. The extra couple of percent vax rate they gained on a vaccination that didnt stop transmission was a massive over reach. The lives saved were down to the early lockdowns.
That is mainly a hindsight view methinks. Nobody really knew at that stage what impact the mutated variants would have.
My mother recalls being out of school for three months when the polio epidemic occurred.
I also think it's a hindsight view. The variants before omicron were brutal, and there are people still not recovered from those infections.
Maybe there is a criticism of Labour for not adapting sooner, but I think many people fail to understand just how difficult it is to change policy fast in a crisis and do that well. Plus everyone was burnt out by then.
If you look back it's a view I exposed when the widespread mandates were announced. Cutting 5% or so of the population from society was always going to have some pretty severe and very long term consequences. Whilst small percentage wise it was actually a group of roughly 200000 people which became a significant and motivated voting block against Labour who essentially propelled NZ1st and Act into Govt.
I'd say by the time they are done whether one term or two the damage done will be far worse than Covid in it's entirety.
as is often the case, the real comparison is forgotten. It wasn't a choice between mandates and the covid we had. It was a choice between mandates and more people dying and becoming disabled. What's the cost of that?
While I agree that the mandates were a factor in the swing away from Labour, I think there would have been a swing away from Nat if they had been in charge. It's probably a natural consequence of being the government in power during a long emergency when there are no good outcomes, just less bad ones.
But Labour did make mistakes, and the degree to which some on the left still won't have that conversation is concerning.
There definitly would have been a swing away from Labour but I doubt nz1st would have made the threshold and lijely a point or 2 off Act as well which makes a Lab Green Tpm govt far more likely
"The lives saved were down to the early lockdowns."
Right you are. What did you think I was referring to? They went too long but its easy to criticise with the benefit of hindsight. At the time new mutations were appearing at regular intervals and nobody back then knew the effect they would have, so they erred on the side of caution. So convenient for critics like yourself to forget all of that.
As for the "wedge" created in society. That was caused by mischievous and vexatious outpourings of mis and disinformation… most of which came from hard-right American fake actors. It was picked up by our homegrown disinformation miscreants, and unfortunately believed by people who should have known better.
We chose vaccination mandates to maintain safety post opening up borders.
The alternative, evidence of infection, was only available to some because of the closed borders.
The irony of the protests, was that a month or so later, the point of them was overtaken by omicron.
Standing in line for ten minutes with a mask on and spacing, compared to working an 8 hour shift, these are not comparable.
The problem wasn't the mandates, it was not looking after the people affected by the mandates.
10min? My local Countdown inside the mall had lines that were often 1 hour long just to get in the store which was pretty at capacity for most of the day so accounting for the enclosed enviroment and shear number of people through a store in a day it would actually be far more likely to spread in the supermarket than a properly manage work place maintaining distance and rapid testing.
the solution to that problem is better supermarket systems during an emergency. It's not to increase general exposure to a serious viral illness.
I agree about the properly managed work place, I just don't think that's what was happening.
But also, I agree that the mandates weren't done very well and came with a hefty dose of ideological shunning (and not just from the government). IMO, that's why we have the social problem now. I think the mandates were a necessary evil given what they knew about Delta at the time. But the two NZs thing was incredibly stupid and made Labour hypocrites given their wellbeing/kindness rhetoric elsewhere. Be kind, but only to the people you agree with.
Rewriting history yet again Crick.
The mandates encouraged/forced many people to get vaccinated, to the point where 95% were vaccinated. This and the lockdowms saved around 18000 lives compared with the UK'S approach.
The mandates added maybe 5 percent to the total vaccination effort at tremendous cost. We wouldn't be dealing with the the current mob in power if we hadn't mandated.
The lockdowns are what made the difference.
the mandates also removed unvaccinated people from key positions like hospitals. It's hard to argue that that was a bad thing.
My issue sits with the widespread mandates not the more targeted mandates in the health system and other senstive areas.
fair enough. They did have the tone of 'fuck off, you're a terrible person'. Extraordinary to see a government do that, but then Mallard and others did the same at the occupation of parliament grounds.
I think this is why the whole kindness thing just fell over. Ardern should have been ushering in a new social standard of connection and tolerance, and in the end she botched.
It was botched the minute she did that two classes of people interview.
Not to mention the various ministers making ill advised comments. The KFC worker, the two woman that crossed the Auckland border spring to mind. Sent the signal it was ok to have a pile on essentially.
It was what it was – like our PM's frank 'bottom feeder' comment
and Clark’s haters and wreckers comment.
it was what it was, but I hope the left can learn from our mistakes.
Failure is the mother of success. A fall into a pit, a gain in your wit
I’m a fan of using failures to inform good change. I think the issue here is twofold. Are we on the left willing to admit to our mistakes? And what do we do when those mistakes are ideologically driven?
Some on the left are (sometimes) and some aren't. Incumbent politicians in particular are typically reluctant to admit to their mistakes (ideological and otherwise), for obvious reasons. If NZ's politics of kindness was a short-lived departure from the norm, then imagine how long the politics of admitting mistakes would last.
Imho, the decision to cancel the iRex project was a mistake, and an ideological swish of a new broom at that, but how would it serve Willis (or anyone) to admit that a year after the fact. We can only hope that as the costs of on-again off-again infrastructure tussles mount, greater consideration will be given to lasting bipartisan agreements about the infrastructure Kiwis need and how to fund it.
Dreams are free – for the many, not the few.
agreed, the current system makes if very hard for politicians to be honest. I don’t really expect Ardern to address this even if she did have a change of heart, anymore than I expect Clark to. But it would be amazing if they did now that they are out of politics.
I was thinking of the left more broadly. Can we discuss the mistakes that Labour or the Greens or TPM have made, in a way that takes us somewhere useful rather than going round and round in the same old circles?
Possibly, if the broad left can arrive at a consensus about what those mistakes are/were. Imho, it's best to focus on (big) issues for which a broad consensus exists, but we can't even agree on tax reform, six years after the Tax Working Group made its recommendations.
The right, otoh, are ruthless – the consensus of Mammon (the worship of material wealth) rules.
Yes, that's right, but one pivital error was not to guarantee jobs once the mandates were lifted. In the same vein, the temporary nature of the mandates needed to be hammered home.
both good points.
He mentioned vaccine mandates. Not border quarantine and home isolation when infected.
An infection provide as much protection as a vaccine dose.
Jenny @2
21 January 2025 at 10:03 am
The final dangerous act of a senile old fruit and nut case….
,,,,,Of all the American democratic institutions and legal and justice systems being targeted by Trump, America's political elites are the best able to defend, themselves, publicly and in court…..
Whether, the law is always right and useful, or not, people and institutions attacked by Trump, who don't have the benefit of a pardon to hide behind, will have no choice but to use the law to challenge Trump's attacks.
Few if any of these institutions and individuals will have the resources and platform available to America's liberal political elite.
That of course is precisely why Biden had to pre-emptively pardon his family, key officials, and the whole of the Bipartisan Committee that investigated the Jan 6 insurrection.
How much of trumps motivation to get re-elected do you think comes from his ability to dodge jail because he won?
He claimed he won the election in 2020 and formed a PAC to contest the result, but instead used the money to favour GOP loyalists over others. This was to maintain control over the party and win the nomination for 2024.
Any candidate is in it to win.
100%
Pretty serious stuff from Anne Salmond on Newsroom. Terrifying?
A grim warning for what is happening via the Regulatory Standards Bill.
https://newsroom.co.nz/2025/01/21/anne-salmond-hayeks-bastards/?utm_source=Newsroom&utm_campaign=dab0ac5ba2-Daily_Briefing+21.01.2025&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_71de5c4b35-dab0ac5ba2-95522477&mc_cid=dab0ac5ba2&mc_eid=88a3081e75
the thing that has changed is that protofascist libertarians are now emboldened to say this stuff out loud. Thanks Trump voters. And useless left wing parties who've been dithering over neoliberal power.
It is scary, and it's more scary now because they are saying it out loud. This means the culture has shifted enough for this to be acceptable.
The reason ACT are getting away with it is because the liberals have fucked up. Instead of presenting a comprehensive vision and policy approach that is an attractive alternative to the right, they've been making a hash of solidarity politics and rejecting anything that isn't neoliberal centrism.
People don't like being told they're bad/wrong. So of course they're going to look to populist parties that welcome them in. It blows my mind that the left doesn't get this. Better right than elected. Look how that's turning out.
It's not too late in NZ. But Labour simply winning the next election won't be enough. We, the left, have to change.
"We, the left, have to change."
Amen to that.
We have so, so far to go if the squabble about terms for American caramel coloured people, in Mickey's 'Luxon Reshuffle' post is anything to go by.
Weeell, it was a self-described libertarian who brought "American caramel coloured people" into it.
If the left have to change into that, then I'm out.
And the left wonders why it's losing.
because of course, we're perfect and never get anything wrong.
And the left wonders why increasing numbers of people think we're tossers, or just outright hate us.
Not sure if 'the left' in NZ is claiming they're "perfect and never get anything wrong", but such claims don't seem to hurt certain populist pollies.
Being Trump, for example, means never having to say you're sorry
Otoh, 'apology' may be Lux's secret weapon – best used sparingly, naturally.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/nov/12/new-zealand-apology-chrisopher-luxon-abuse-in-religious-care-institutions
https://nzhistory.govt.nz/te-akomanga/contexts-activties/government-apologies-to-teach-learn-history
A NZ Labour party that can't formally acknowledge the harm done by Rogernomics is a party I can't vote for – heck, even Jim Bolger said neoliberalism had failed NZ.
true, the NZ left isn't claiming that. I was taking a poke at certain lefties like MB who had literally just said the left don't have to change. The hubris in that position.
I also think the liberal left in particular have a political process position that we're the good ones and others should think like us. That's probably less of a problem that our inability to self reflect and talk about it. MB's statement just epitomised this, hence my sarcastic response.
MB didn’t say that, neither literally nor implicitly.
weka: the left have to change
MB: if the left have to change, I'm out.
How is that not MB saying the left don't have to change?
MB said this:
It was a conditional rejection/refusal, not an absolute one.
change into what?
Ironically the point, I thought, being made was not attacking people for their appearance.
Hence the we go high when they go low comment.
I don't know of anyone that enjoys being corrected, even less by a 'comrade'.
But the left is more concerned with being correct rather than appropriate.
Change into what?
that unfortunately is the nature of social media. The ones who think point scoring is more important than political solutions.
I would suggest social media is just another means to do this.
I'm picking you remember the '80s and the rise and rise of political correctness.
Sure, in comedy like lots of other realms, change was needed ( mother in law and my wife is so fat… jokes).
But- folks of a certain inclination (lefties)took it too far. Being more pure than thou and being barbed with it.
A kind of Purity Olympics.
I've also noticed how the left hates being outflanked on the left by others. This would be part of the driving force of the holier than thou attitude.
Being politically correct and fact-checking are different things that have different purposes.
When you refer to ‘pure’, what exactly do you mean? I think one easily strays into straw men.
Hoping you're not vegan, but one area outside of conventional politics where it's easy to see purity spirals is in parts of the vegan movement. I've known people in their 20s especially who've been vegan and want to start eating animal products again for health reasons, but they face immense social pressure from their vegan friends and peers.
The purity spiral is where it's not enough to be semi vegan or even to have doubts, and people would rather lose friends than allow others to differ from them. It's not just the eat animals or not thing, it's a whole set of prescribed behaviours and beliefs that get enforced through social sanctions (and increasingly through work sanctions). You have to believe all the things or you are morally bankrupt.
I haven't seen purity spirals in politics discussed in quite a while, but I remember the pile ons on NZ pol twitter where people would get destroyed for saying the wrong thing. It was terrible to watch. We can blame twitter platform for that, but that was NZ progressives doing it.
I think part of what we are seeing now is a result of the liberal left going too far and making belief politics more important than relationships. The people without such super strong convictions find it really off putting. Why would you want to vote for someone who is saying believe the same as me or you will be shunned? At the least, this was a massive own goal for the left, giving the right ammunition to portray us as removing freedoms.
Obviously there are other serious dynamics at play, including the manipulation of social media and mainstream media.
That’s ideology and ideological (and other) bias dominating discourse. Sounds to me this is a communication issue, not a fundamental political/philosophical difference of views & opinions. Language and framing are critically important in political discourse but they’re not the goal per se; fact-checking is a useful tool to gain understanding and make well-informed evidence-based arguments, choices, and decisions – PC is a (minor) distraction. The Right, particularly, has learned this and applies it very well to hijack the media with their Orwellian tricks such as double-speak. They are doing it so well that they have turned the tables and use the Left’s own values against itself – the Left has a tendency to kill its own as much as the Right does.
exactly. This is the general point I am making when I critique the left. But while I think it's a communication issue, I also think it's about fundamental positions. Or it looks that way, maybe someone can point out if that's not true.
For instance, vegans believe that killing or using animals is always wrong. That's a philosophical position.
Where vegans believe that everyone should be vegan, that's a political position.
Where vegans believe that the way to make everyone vegan is to shun people who stray from the first two, that's the ideological position. Not of veganism, but that it's valid to force people to think and act a certain way.
When I critique the liberal left, I am saying that all those things are happening, but it's really the last one that is the problem, and a particular problem for the left because the position that people in society can be forced to think something is antithetical to leftist positions of collective good.
It's also a problem for libertarians and I wonder if this is why the conversation can't be had. People react to the critique because it sounds like the RW libertarian critique. But thinking it is valid to force people to become leftist undermines progressive concepts of wellbeing for all. It's really hard for me to understand why this isn't recognised by many.
Yes, that makes sense, thank you.
I think the progressive Left intrinsically have a harder job at coming up with compelling arguments and persuading others to join them and ‘existing members’ to stay in the tent. This can cause frustration and anger, obviously. But the underlying issue is that there’s no viable alternative yet or at least one that can be explained easily in relatively simple compelling terms that appeal and resonate enough for people to adopt it. At the moment, and at best, it appears to be a swirl of good ideas and vibes that feel disjointed.
As evolution has shown us, there are many distinct advantages of unicellular organism organising into multicellular ones at the costs of energy input required. I think that this same principle (biological law?) also applies to higher levels of life as well, including mankind, but this doesn’t provide a blueprint of what it could (not should) look like.
How come intrinsically?
Maybe. I think Corbyn made a good job of it but was stymied by the reactionary forces against him, most damaging were the ones inside his own party. I would count this as the central problem (in NZ too), but it’s true that modern humans are losing our creative imagination to see how things are being done differently.
very cool. I’ve seen this used as a framework for understanding change by those insisting we can create a better world while in the polycrisis. Intervening at tipping points so we tip in the good direction not the bad one (to put is simplistically).
I'm not talking about fact checking.
The exchange that is under Mickey's post on Luxon's reshuffle is a good example of folk being more correct, purer and (dare I say it) woke.
The original point was that it was poor form to comment on Simeon Brown's appearance/stature.
This led to whom the comment 'When they go low we go high' is attributed to'.
Then that morphed into the (politically) correct terminology for an American person of colour.
So far so tedious, but coz it's lefties involved there are the unnecessary barbs- "decent people", "do all black people look alike" etc.
All of which detracts from the original and important point, because having a crack at someone's appearance is dirty pool and a distraction from their political short-comings.
After all, we (the royal we that is) weren't impressed with the horse comparisons to a recent PM.
Plus, as this thread started out, I was tautoko weka's observation that the left needs to unify a truckload more especially if we really want this to be a one term government.
Ok, thanks.
I tend to struggle (i.e. I get confused) with criticisms of alleged ‘pure/purity’ of the Left as being a root-cause for ‘something bad’. Ironically, the Left (or rather, Labour) weren’t so ideologically pure when they enabled Roger Douglas to introduce (unleash) neoliberalism here in NZ.
Unfortunately, this thread and Post have descended into rabbit holes such as PC, mockery (aka body-shaming), belief politics, and so on, none of this points or leads to unity.
FWIW, say what you mean, mean what you say, and without causing deliberate offence, but stick to evidence as much as is realistic and warranted under the circumstances and context, guided by firm but not rigid values & principles. I believe this is as useful a guide as any for robust constructive debate.
Yes, especially to last paragraph and drop the snark.
I don't think people are fully aware of the damage, distrust and disconnect done by the Covid response. Very much so those on the dissenting side.
Dissenters weren't all cookers, right wing, conspiracy theorists or unhinged. I feel the disconnect felt by many is also an overlooked aspect to the last election result. Less about 'punishing Labour, more Labour weren't or forgot to talk to them.
Is your or Weka’s argument that the government response to Covid-19 somehow is an example of what the (NZ) Left are doing ‘wrong’? Somewhere early on in this thread it went off track onto criticisms of PC-pure language and being, or not being, ‘pure’ enough for some dogmatic Lefties. Meanwhile, the Coalition is continuing its blitzkrieg of dismantling the State as we know it and replacing it with a new regime of libertarian and neo-liberal rules & regulations that will last beyond the next change of government in similar ways as did Rogernomics.
Not sure how to reply to yr last comment, the Reply tag isn't there.
"Is your or Weka’s argument that the government response to Covid-19 somehow is an example of what the (NZ) Left are doing ‘wrong’?"
No, not from where I am at.
The reason I bought up Covid response was that it had done huge damage- socially and politically. With the notion that the left needs to organise (work out what it stands for), coalesce around certain issues and unite. The uniting and coalescing becomes difficult if one is scorned or shunned for minor perceived infractions. Mislabelling a caramel coloured person for example.
All the more important for the reasons you point out.
Got it, and I’m happy to leave aside a discussion of Covid-19.
Uniting and coalescing take effort and energy – the Right has got a much easier job in fragmenting and atomising society.
Is that mislabelling and the corresponding reaction, silly as it is, a cause or a symptom of the ‘disease’ that’s affecting the Left, in your opinion?
When, where and how?
Both African American and black American terms are in common use and without any PC issue. And most do not quibble about the amount of colour involved.
this conversation,
https://thestandard.org.nz/luxons-panicked-reshuffle/#comment-2021739
it wasn't my argument either, but to put it in that context, my view on the government response is that we were incredibly fortunate to have that government at that time, that they did very important things in managing a very difficult situation, *and* there were areas where they fucked up. How they handled the mandates was one of them. I don't mean the mandates were wrong (I think they were a necessary evil), but I agree with gsays that the way they were done caused a lot of resentment and Labour were largely unable to address that ever since (for lots of reasons, including ideology, but also pandemic burnout).
I think gsays was saying that tone policing is not a priority given everything else that is going on, and that a big emphasis on it is part of the problem the left has. It's not a minor issue, it's part of the core dynamic of we're right and everyone should agree with us.
I think it's worse than that. I think they are doing the next iteration of setting NZ up for fascism or authoritarianism (FJK's government was the first iteration). Unless the left/progressives come up with an attractive and viable alternative, I think NZ is heading down our own version of what is happening in the US and the UK. We're lucky that we still have time to change.
I agree that ‘tone policing’ is relatively unimportant in the greater scheme of things although being civil and respectful don’t take much effort and go a long way – some people like to be rude a-holes to others they disagree with.
I don’t accept the accusation that the ‘core dynamic’ or ‘core problem’ of the Left is “we’re right and everyone should agree with us” – there are certainly a few hardline dogmatic Lefties (as there are on the Right) around but I’d argue that they’re a minority. In other words, I think this is an annoying meme that seems to have taken hold on both sides of the spectrum with the Left being the main loser.
I have labelled this Coalition neo-authoritarian from the early days and indeed there are growing signs of proto-fascism. As I just wrote in another comment (https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-21-01-2025/#comment-2021913), TINA, for all intents and purposes.
@ Incog
"Is that mislabelling and the corresponding reaction, silly as it is, a cause or a symptom of the ‘disease’ that’s affecting the Left, in your opinion?"
A symptom. Loads of reasons we had for coming together either don't exist or there are other priorities.
Couple that with consumerism spending billions telling us how important we are. We can look past wee indiscretions if there is a larger cause in play.
Our politicians are more like managers than leaders. No vision or bigger picture for us to aspire to.
I think it started there, but it's not that straightforward right? Important progressive politics got labelled PC. But yeah, in hindsight it looks like the merging of liberal politics and neoliberalism and the dropping of class politics.
Somehow in that, progressive politics got lost and this neoliberal hybrid emerged that was more about the pressure to be pure. I remember early debates on TS about sexism and racism, but the point of that wasn't to frame white men as bad, it was to talk about the systems and to change them.
The current push to say white men are evil is fucked up and I don't understand why so many liberals cannot see the problem. Especially in country like NZ where Māori have a culture of care and respect for people (he tangata etc, and giving mana). That the left can't even have this conversation is very troubling.
Weka, talking about facts, WHO is saying white men are evil in today's NZ?
don't have the energy to go get specific, cited examples, but the whole 'Karen' phenomenon is another example. What started out as a genuine political critique of how some groups of white women behave in relation to black people (specifically in the US context), morphed into trying to make out that white women as a class are bad/wrong, and then also became a handy stick legitimising sexists (some of whom are liberals).
Hardly anyone says all white men are evil. But the framing has shifted from white men have privilege in society because of structural issues, to white men have privilege in society, to white men are a problem.
When white men try to talk about that, they get shut down. By that stage we are a very long way from being able to talk about both how the patriarchal system privileging some groups means oppressing others (and what to do about that system) and from being able to talk about the specific problems that working class white men have under the same system.
It's not a coincidence that that happened during neoliberalism that has stripped Labour from its working class roots and seen voters and supporters abandon it en masse. But how often does the left talk about working class white men now?
WHEN are white men 'shut down'? Challenged, maybe. But Julian Batchelar, etc, etc still get to say what they want, in a thousand forums.
do you think Labour has abandoned class politics? I'm asking because you appear to have just invoked a prominent racist activist male as a way of avoiding class analysis. It makes me think you don't understand the argument here.
Probably, gsays, people called out offensiveness without being 'nice' about it. Remember, you're free to say anything you want. But of course then you must face the consequences of using abusive language, even if you as speaker don't perceive it that way.
If some 'lefties' 'policed' your language on others' behalf, then I don't think you understand how much micro-agression women used to, and minorities still do, suffer in NZ. Hidden under 'just joshing around'.
The sticks&stones chant is wrong: being constantly sledged in the workplace, for example, can drive people to suicide.
PC language training is quite similar to sexual consent training. You have to step into other peoples’ shoes, and understand that what seems harmless and apparently consensual to you is not so to them, if they feel powerless to object.
FYi, not being exposed to social media pile-ons much myself, at least one can disengage from that easily enough by using the off-switch, unless doxed.
And it happens in the other direction as well, see poorly chosen wording of Marama Davidson at Posie Parker debacle. And often with greater consequence for the speaker.
self isolating while useful in protecting oneself from bullying mobs, doesn't actually stop bullying mobs. On twitter for instance, someone using the off switch tends to give the mob a sense of power and they move on to the next one.
It's a feature, not a bug, of such SM platforms.
Alexi Sayle sums it up well here in less than a minute.
😆
So Elmo is mask off, just blatantly giving n@zi salutes on live international tv. Super. Just fantastic. I couldn't enough to vomit as much as I would like.
Of course the apologists will be along soon to say that the guy who reinstated nazis on his platform, amplified nazi ideas and antisemitic conspiracies and endorsed the neo-nazi AfD was actually throwing a Bellamy salute.
While ignoring that the Bellamy salute fell out of fashion because it looked too much like the version that became popular in 1930s Germany.
heh, someone did that above, "that's not a real Nazi salute, palm down, etc…"
The Bellamy Salute history – to pledge allegiance to the US flag. It's palm upwards. It was replaced by the hand over the heart after the Nazis used a similar salute, but with palm facing down.
Musk's salute does look very much like a Nazi one on a video, especially the way he slaps his chest.
>30 years too late.
Joe Biden Grants Clemency To Leonard Peltier
The ailing Native American rights activist has been in prison for nearly 50 years after the U.S. government lied to put him there.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/joe-biden-leonard-peltier-clemency_n_67608b04e4b0d06419ec6367
https://web.archive.org/web/20181201005042/https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/letters/ct-leonard-peltier-should-be-released-in-the-interest-of-justice-20170117-story.html
Youre right. But better late than never. Thats awesome news for him.
Excellent news.
Enrique Tarrio is next – and he wasn't in a gunfight that saw two FBI agents shot in the head after being wounded.
NAct MPs offering a tribute to their deity. Aotearoa New Zealand on sale – again
We need 'NZ not for sale' hats and tshirts, like the Canadians.
Take a look at the expression on the faces of Biden, Harris and the Clintons. Gold!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-e9bb4f21-518d-4242-a1b1-71250990e639
Chewie and Pat back at Big Hairy News. They evicerate Luxon's chair-shuffling.
So is destiny church going to lose it's charity status for bearing false witness?
Is the dirty politics crowd ever going to face justice?
Nothing wrong so far.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/stats-nz-inquiry-clears-whanau-ora-of-2023-census-data-breach/MSHXHJ7HUFGDLO3D7UEU54XWGI/
I think that an enquiry of the Stats. Department actions, set up and given its terms of reference by the Department, rather deserve the immortal comment by Mandy Rice-Davies when told that Lord Astor denied any affair with her said "Well he would, wouldn't he"
Of course this enquiry found a result that was what was wanted.
I think most of us know about one particular enquiry (in the early 80s) which didn't deliver the desired result. There were "consequences".
So do you agree or disagree that Destiny Church Should be punished?
Suppose you were a member of the Green Party.
Then suppose you made a comment that was insulting to a member of the Government.
Should the joint leaders of the Green party be jailed because of your action?
But the outcome of Destiny losing its charitable status is a financial outcome, not a physical punishment, surely?
So lying for finical gain is all good with you alwyn?
Because you have a real case of missing the point here. Say what you want about the greens, labour, national, act or who ever. The point here though, is they lied for finical gain, with the bonus that it was a political hit job.
As such let me ask again – is lying for finical gain enough for you, for them to lose their tax free status or not? Which is the appropriate punishment for this type of crime.
Please tell me what crime you believe the Destiny Church has committed? And what evidence do you have for your claim? And who, exactly is supposed to have lied?
And before you do any of that. Answer the question I asked you.
I assume you mean "financial" by the way.
From google AI…
Umm https://register.charities.govt.nz/Charity/CC29039
They apparently
And google AI again
Sounds like the usual ditch and restart musical chairs that the Companies Act allows for dropping debts in receivership and liquidations. Obviously the Charities Acts do as well.
I look for that practice when I am looking for 'legitimate' scam artists. Legal, but indicates an untrustworthy intent.
Ok – I finally managed to read the article past the paywall and saw the Density Church reference
That does read like standard dirty politics tactics. Probably legal. A waste of everyone's time.
and
However as you implicitly point out, there is nothing unlawful in being a lying sack of shit, and there was no actual evidence that the Density Church are a cause of them being lying sacks of shit
I'd happily publish the names of the lying arseholes who just wasted a lot of taxpayers money time with what is pretty obviously a spurious claim released as part of a dirty politics move. Anyone know what their names are?
Your last paragraph illustrates why people may be very loath to come forward with a complaint.
"I'd happily publish the names of the lying arseholes who just wasted a lot of taxpayers money time with what is pretty obviously a spurious claim released as part of a dirty politics move. Anyone know what their names are?"
People who bring forward claims like this can sometimes suffer attacks that sound a bit like that. Is it any wonder that they are unwilling to speak up?
It may seem to you that it is "pretty obviously a spurious claim" but the people to whom it was made, and who required some sort of investigation don't appear to have been quite so sure.
Did you read this comment by MS about the time Cameron Slater tried to hack The Standard?
I'm no IT expert, but if that hack was successful your details could have been in the hands of an extremist vigilante who has dreams of being above the law. This was your guy doing the hacking, but still something for you to think about.
Well number one. It doesn't appear to have been a hack by anybody. It was a complaint by a number of people about activities that went on at the Manurewa marae.
Number two. It doesn't seem to have had anything to do with Cameron Slater.
Number three. What do you mean "your guy"? Why do you feel the need to smear me as well as the people who were whistle blowers by linking us all to Slater who appears, from what I have read about him, to be some sort of a creep.
The complaints appear to have been politically motivated because they were both complaints against an already approved process, and also complaints by people affiliated with Density Church, a political opponent of TPM.
You brought up the reluctance people might have in making complaints in a political environment. Just saying that we kind of do that here every time we comment and despite the pseudonyms and the burner emails we might employ, IP addresses are traceable to those who might want to use them. Cameron Slater is one of those people.
It's convenient you now distance yourself from Slater, but in reality he is your guy because you share politics with him. You always have.
Sure. But the counter argument is about spurious complaints that look like they have been essentially fabricated for political effect or for defamatory purposes – like these ones appear to have been. This clearly wasn’t whistle blowing. This was a deliberate attempt to spread misinformation. It is no different to what that sack of shit Cameron Slater was paid to do when he defamed Matthew Blomfield and others. Such actions should carry consequences.
The claims that I read in the news reports were
Both are clearly refuted by this report. Both would have been criminal offences.
It was used for the contracted purpose – to increase uptake of Maori in the census. As contracted to Stats for the census- who ultimately provide the information that is used for the electoral bounds (mesh blocks).
I have never been in favour of whistle blowing being a pain-free activity, and in practice it usually often isn’t. Whistle blowing protections shouldn’t be there for deliberate malicious misinformation.
That should be treated exactly the same turning in a malicious complaint or report to the police – s24 of the Summary Offences Act
Ok – so where exactly did these people make a ‘claim’ to? They apparently didn’t make it to any responsible authority. Not to the police. Not to the organisation. Not to the contracting agency – Stats. Not to a legal representative or a MP.
Perhaps you can enlighten us before making dickhead comments like that.
So who were they? Did they make a complaint or report to a responsible authority? Enlighten me…. If I had to bet and based on the report, we’d find the the irresponsible arseholes who made these claims never went near anyone responsible.
It sounds like they or some activists that they talked to just leaked it to a journalist. Any triggering official complaint or whistle blowing was at least 3rd or 4th hand.
The people who required some investigation and who did it were the Stats department. Who it appears had never been contacts with these claims, but were a organisation who had a unsubstantiated accusation in the news
I can’t see how the claimants should have protection as a ‘whistle blower’. As far as I can see they acted without any responsibility based on nothing more than gossip.
Sure we have a legal avenue for dealing with that. But it is a civil case. In effect it is defamation – which is exactly what these irresponsible arseholes relied on. They didn’t make a claim to responsible authorities and get protected under whistle blower protections. They appear to have deliberately avoided criminal consequences and just lied to a reporter instead.
This is exactly the playbook of dirty politics. It is what Cameron Slater and Dermot Nottingham routinely did. What I think that Jordan Williams has done a lot of, most notably by betraying a friend. Sure it causes inordinate amounts of time in civil court. Frequently losing. It is why Slater and Nottingham have been bankrupted by court ordered costs and judgements.
It is dirty politics and doesn’t need whistle blower protections. What it needs is a law of malicious criminal defamation.
In the absence of that, public identification should be required. As far as I can tell, many of the people who make this style of irresponsible claims are serial offenders – certainly all of the ones I have ever looked at are. A public record would be a good deterrent against repeated spurious claims.
The USA joins the opt off the planet earth group.
https://bsky.app/profile/briantylercohen.bsky.social/post/3lg7kt5eu4225
First the Paris Accord and now WHO.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c391j738rm3o
Trump intends to deny the children of undocumented migrants living in the US status as citizens.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyjqgl2erzo
Same rules as here right?
If supported by two thirds of Congress – that is going to be some transactional agreement process.
They also have to get it approved by the legislatures in three-quarters (currently 38) of the States.
Extra detail. We allow permanent residents to vote – this is not so in the USA.
https://www.aila.org/files/o-files/view-file/90A4956C-43D0-4674-86A0-60FF66994CD6
And ours since 2006.
https://www.govt.nz/browse/passports-citizenship-and-identity/nz-citizenship/types-of-citizenship-grant-birth-and-descent/
More general practice story.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7vdnlmgyndo
This government?
구더기 무서워 장 못 담그랴
gu-deo-gi mu-seo-weo jang mot dam-geu-rya
Yes, I see how this could be an apt comparison, except in this case our government and the 굼벵이 are one and the same.