This will be the third election since the site started. I merely start escalating the length of times for repeat bans as an inducement for people to find their better behaviour in the election year. It is amazing how some of the inter-election bickering diminishes as the ban length steadily rises towards “after the next election”.
I try to go for the whole subtle approach..
lprent
Yeah right
In response to Jono Hutchinson reporting on a comment on mine on this site, Lynn Prentice with the help of others has engaged in a character assassination of myself.
This character assassination probably springs from Lynn’s insecurity that left commentary departing from the Labour Green political script will be picked up by the media.
As part of this character assassination Lynn Prentice has let Qot a poster on this site make comments slandering me as a inveterate liar. Fair enough I suppose. But if I try and defend myself by asking her and others who attack my integrity to provide just one example to back up their accusations. Lynn censors my comment.
It seems that on this site you have the right to be attacked but no right to defend yourself.
This character assassination launched on me is obviously building up to justify a complete ban to prevent me making comments during the run up to the elections next year.
Lynn Prentice himself has called me delusional and accused me of lying. He has also accused me of twisting his words. It is not my fault that he has changed his testimony since I first commented on them.
As it looks likely that I will be banned from commenting on this site during the elections. I have decided to put up the debate here. And let the readers decide whether it is justified, or not.
Lynn. Whether or not it can be proved that Shearer shouted out “We will be having a review”. I know what I heard. (And saw) Your supporters are not even saying that I am mistaken. You let them call me a liar, letting them attack my integrity at will. When I challenge them to show just one example of this, which you know they can’t, you blank it out. In this you are colluding with those who are trying to paint me as a liar. These are the actions of a bully.
I know that you are hostile to my attempt to make climate change an election issue, which by all accounts indicate it will not be. To this end you are trying to use a minor dispute to attack my integrity and ultimately to shut me out, so that you can happily have your election coverage and debate in peace, free to ignore climate change. Don’t deny it you have already expressed this view. It is, “Politics 101″. not to expend political capital on this one issue, you said.
I can see the writing on the wall. Go ahead disgrace yourself.
In my opinion we should be expending every form of capital we have to defeat this menace.
In this ongoing debate between you and me, it doesn’t surprise me that you take David Shearer’s side against David Cunliffe. In my opinion David Cunliffe is the only parliamentarian who has taken climate change seriously.
I thought Cunliffe’s contribution was dignified and sincere while Shearer’s was churlish and uncalled for. You disagree. I suppose we all make our own bed and have to lie in it. Live then, with an administration that will permit the continuation of climate change and the collection of metadata against its citizens, you will have done your part to bring it about.
Now I’m aware that you have been avoiding this next question. There would have been NO reason for him to tell Cunliffe to hew to the party line then – because Cunliffe had already finished doing exactly that. Basically you appear to be both illogical and delusional on this point which has been raised by others and you have not addressed
That’s the crux of the matter TRP. If Shearer was saying exactly what Cunliffe was saying why did he need to so rudely interject it?
And by the way, there were a number of other people who have confirmed they heard David Shearer say “We will be having a review”. Notice the full stop. This was after Cunliffe said our leader has promised a review and “this law must not, will not and can not stand”. Shearer’s unmissable message is “WE WILL BE HAVING A REVIEW’ full stop. And no, heartfelt “this bill cannot stand” nonsense will be tolerated.
It looks to me that we are in line for another tragic sell out.
It is cross over. Takes time to write comments and read other comments. I had the same irritation about telling you repeatably to read the update at the end of my post
The major nuisances imo on The Standard open mike (which users are fortunate to have going by many other blogs) for me are ranked thus:
• over long pieces
• boring others who use some of their valuable time visiting and contributing here
• being at variance with any recognisable version of political reality
• posting the same crappola once too often
So I end up automatically skating over about a dozen regulars but stopping and reading every word from about the same number who write pithy relevant comments.
Tiger Mountain
You could be criticising me I think. So my defence for longer items –
. over long pieces – I will often copy some of a longer piece that makes good points that are relevant, and then I put the links so others can read the rest for themselves, if…
. boring – they don’t think the subject is boring. And not everything can be absorbed on any given day but is still important to others.
. being at variance…with political reality – What is it? Can reality be
definitely established? And could I and others survive the actuality which might
be entirely lacking in hope for something better. Endless chewing of cuds of trivia though just becomes boring when it seems to be fantasy fiction. One hopes of course that it is.
. posting the same crappola once too often.
My thing is that it would be a better world if we applied more carrot and less stick, more
community kindness and less rule-driven judgementalism, more care for parents and help for them so there were less distressing results of wrong doing, and concentrating on happy families working together etc etc I get repetitive about this. But seeing it seems obvious to me and is not a new idea but continues to be resisted by policy makers and policy followers, I think it does need holding up continuously as a worthwhile and achievable goal.
And I don’t think short sharp comments show much thinking. They are more just acknowledgments and reactions from people who know about the matter. Sometimes a mere agreement with a well-written comment, or a pithy, funny, clever, heartfelt or whatever one is good.
But to inform on a thought at least a few words are needed, a bit of explanation to fill out the opinion etc. People who know what they are talking about or trying to present the matter in a new way make the thread interesting. I choose my favourites but also look at the thought lines of others, and soon find those who I consider haven’t got joined up synapses and skip them. And the ones that are obviously RWNJ spoilers I enjoy applying some well-rounded phrases as they usually seem no more than naughty children throwing stones to annoy while at the same time being prepared to impact and hurt.
Boring is in the mind of the interpreter …what bores one will not bore another …and divergence is good ….so bring on all those boring old farts and right wingers and vulgarians and lets have some fun! ( too many smart people can be mind numbing)
Also I like Jenny and what she has to say ….so keep going Jenny ….keep fighting for Cunliffe ….and whatever happened to Xstasy ?
Thanks Chooky
I know I do a few long ones but not all about the same thing though. Jenny is very focussed and long. I have to skip – I haven’t the time. Diversity is good, but focus is important and Jenny’s can be excellent but I like detective stories for a long read.
I like obsessive compulsives myself…and Climate Change is important to be harped on about ( that said I would also be interested in those HAARP conspiracy stories my American friend used to go on and on about until she went off the internet…ha ha) ….Labour Leadership cant be let go of either ….someone has to keep at it like a Rotweiller with a bone!….WATCH DOGS are the answer. I am rather partial to conspiracy theories and Sci fi myself for a longer read.
No, I was asking you to put up evidence, a timeline, anything to examine your claims. After all there were a pile of mics, cameras, and people at that meeting – surely you’d be able to find some kind of support. Something that was so clearly lacking when you made the assertion in the first place and that fool Hutchison wrapped a story around it.
When you did I looked at it with the results I reported. I see you haven’t dealt with that at all in this comment. Have you even listened to that video’s audio track? Or did gathering evidence get lost in your obsessional drive to put your own spin and unsupported assertions on events.
Basically I think that your assertions about what Shearer said are outright fantasy
Jenny, out of mole hills mountains are made, your claims about what Dave,(the incumbent),said or didn’t say to the other Dave,(not the incumbent), and in what manner he said it, including that Dave(the incumbent) was trying to Bully Dave(not the incumbent) have become in terms of what has occurred since farcical,
Having read parts of this ‘debate’ what i have so far ascertained is that you will not answer even the most simple of questions, ‘were you in the hall when the interjection by Dave(the incumbent) was made and if so where in the hall were you’,
Your assertion made here this morning that LPrent is attacking you for sinister reasons, that being ‘your’ attempt to make Climate Change an election issue, have i missed something, can you add a little proof to such an assertion like in what Post and on which days such an attempt has been made,
i can assure you that Climate change is and will be an election issue, do you know why, the Green Party will be standing in that election, full stop,
You don’t seem to accept the criticisms leveled at you, no big thing i certainly struggle to do the same, however this morning’s calling for martyrdom of yourself takes the farce to new heights,
Yeah exactly, the amount of vitriol and invective leveled at Dave(the incumbent), would scorch what remains of the natural hair off of the head of the Slippery little Shyster we have as Prime Minister if leveled at Him,(leaving Him with only a large patch of soft hairs gathered from the anal crevice of a blind donkey called Brucie)…
You do realise that John Key already wears a toupée? All that fretting about who he ripped of as an investment banker I guess. Didn’t realise they made toupées from the “soft hairs gathered from the anal crevice of a blind donkey” though.
Well said. bad12. Her refusal to state whether she was actually there and if so, where in the hall totally undermined her credibility in my eyes.
But re your request that she identify her posts on climate change, Jenny has put up many comments seeking to make climate change the only issue (usually the first post on Open Mike). In many of these posts, Jenny has at the same time claimed that the Greens have sold out on climate change and attacked them for this supposed sell-out. I gave up reading any of Jenny’s comments on this issue long ago.
Yeah i have read a number of these comments from jenny and commented on the odd occasion about Her little obsession,
Read paragraph 2 of Her little effort today and there is a direct accusation that LPrent is attacking Jenny over the ‘Dave interjection’ because LPrent does not like what Jenny has previously commented on about ‘climate change/election issue’, blah blah and on She goes,
Such Machiavellian Bull-s**t simply does my head in where the is no proof offered to back up such an assertion,
i have no reason what-so-ever to be a Dave(the incumbent) supporter, in fact after the ‘sickness bene on the roof speech’ exactly the opposite, but, give the bloke a ‘fair go’, the training wheels will definitely come off if Labour decide to keep Him as leader and He becomes the Prime Minister but it wont be ummmm aaah that he will be roasted over should this occur…
Your assertion made here this morning that LPrent is attacking you for sinister reasons, that being ‘your’ attempt to make Climate Change an election issue, have i missed something, can you add a little proof to such an assertion like in what Post and on which days such an attempt has been made,
That would be the same LPrent who has written and commented extensively on AGW in these very pages, both promoting good science and knowledge of the realities of AGW and combating CC deniers and idiots.
LOLZ weka, it’s probably time to resort to the rolly eyes icon, Jenny seems to formulate Her comments in the same vein as the wing-nuts do except from a left perspective,
i have a giggle reading some of them and occasionally comment to Her but like a lot of others tend to go yawn and keep scrolling when it’s the same thing over and over…
I find all this stuff symptomatic of trying to paint Shearer in a good light.
The guy is not only a total failure as a leader, he also represents the right wing of Labour.
The substantial difference between the two statements on Thurs night is clear go me.
The future leader Cunliffe made a statement that opposed the Bill outright, taking an implicit repeal position (Must not, cannot and will not stand) not dependent on the review.
Shearer understood this challenge and rejected it shouting out ‘we will do a review’.
“Shearer understood this challenge and rejected it shouting out ‘we will do a review’.”
Yeah, nah. Cunliffe said there would be a review, Shearer (allegedly) said there would be a review. That’s it, no contradiction between them at all. Unless, of course, you have the evidence Jenny has failed to provide …
No, of course you don’t have evidence. There were hundreds of people in the hall, a host of big and little cameras and not a single recording of Shearer contradicting Cunliffe. Because it didn’t happen.
I also attended the meeting, and because I was standing on the left hand side and out of view of the stage, spent most of my time watching the crowd.
Posted on the David dynamic on the Daily Blog the next day. Would’ve refrained if I knew what a dissection the interaction would have resulted in.
From my perspective – at the hall – and with full view of all three Davids:
David Cunliffe did not know that David Shearer had arrived, and stood up to speak because the mike and attention were directed to him, as he had been there since the beginning front and centre. He did not appear to be aware of Shearer during his answer, because Shearer was out of direct sightline, and Cunliffe was skillfully addressing the crowd and not the questioner alone.
David Shearer made tentative but silent moves to answer the question, but as usual in a meeting – since attention was already directed to the front – had little chance of being noticed. When a review was mentioned (and I too thought it was Shearer) – the tone seemed supportive rather than corrective or aggressive, but since I don’t know Shearer’s personality and communication skills intimately – my take is completely personal. In the appreciation following Cunliffe’s “it will not stand!” most people missed it – and also – missed the opportunity to notice Shearer and ask for further clarification.
The interaction, while interesting, was typical of what happens during any informal meeting, and happened in the space of a couple of minutes.
red rattler, AND, the next day clarified that interjection by stating that there will be a full review and we will change the legislation based upon that review,
i can assure you that Climate change is and will be an election issue, do you know why, the Green Party will be standing in that election, full stop,
Well said bad12. Despite the mainstream media ignoring anything to do with anthropogenic climate change (that means it’s man made), there has been some recent serious developments that should mean climate change is once again on the agenda.
As much as these current events about who’s the biggest liar in parliament are entertaining, not much of that performance is going to compare when the effects of climate change start costing us the entire worlds GDP.
Ground-breaking analysis has found that the likely cost of methane emissions as Arctic permafrost melts is 60 trillion dollars (39 trillion pounds) globally, nearly equalling the 70 trillion dollar (46 trillion pound) value of the global economy in 2012.
The dire warning of an “economic time-bomb” comes from the first ever calculation of the potential economic impact of a scenario which some scientists consider increasingly likely – that the unprecedented thaw will trigger the release of methane from the East Siberian Sea in the polar region.
Although the sea holds only a fraction of the Arctic’s vast methane reserves, experts from the universities of Cambridge in England and Erasmus in Rotterdam, Holland warned that even the release of that relatively small proportion of the area’s methane could result in climatic catastrophe around the world.
In that case, politics will truly become the entertainment branch of industry, and the politicians “performance” will be all too horribly inadequate.
Pretty good support ratio. And since Labour’s policy is in line with Mana and the Greens a thumbs up for all those parties to continue along this vein.
Given the higher income and asset owning profile of The Herald it seems like Labour has picked the right policy. But they’ve got to get out there and sell it right and sell it hard!
Looks like Granny didn’t like the results of that poll. It’s been replaced with another poll likely to give a more comforting result for their Tory masters..
TV3 News, your pro govt news channel, according to a commenter on this stuffed article says that TV3 did apologise last night for their bold error on Saturday night’s news where they stated that bottles had been thrown at the Palmy GCSB protest when in fact they hadn’t.
I guess if they get their tip off’s from random emails that contain no photographic evidence and they don’t bother to verify the claim, then they are willing to say anything as long as it is sensational and frames the mighty anti GCSB movement as just another flakey protest.
I missed the news last night, did anyone see the apology? Must have been a sheepish one.
Also on that Saturday bulletin they “misrepresented” the truth in regards to the gates at parliament and access for the protesters With repressed mirth they talked about protesters climbing over the closed gates when there was a gate open nearby. The reality was the immediate entrance was closed and 1000’s had to squeeze through the small side gate.
All this on top of the- you-know -what Jonolism story last week (see Jenny at post #1) it looks like they have a real agenda to pursue.
Just as well John Campbell is there to shine a light
Hi, Rosie, I did see it. Very short and a fair way into the bulletin, unlike the original item. Though, to be fair to them, they were pretty open about the nature of the mistake and promised to do better. So I’m confident there will be no more Jonolism on TV3 till, ahhhh, 6 O’clock tonight.
and Anonymous bringing down around 11 National Party websites today, it’s all going off lately. Our voices are getting louder and stronger. Soon the media will have to acknowledge the legitimacy of the grievances of NZ citizens and stop being apologists for the govt………….might be a naive view, but you never know!
That is the thing, generally speaking the Slater/Farrar sewer racism is to loath Polynesians, but worship Chinese. This seems to be because they can only see the the world in terms of fearful, Manichean objectification.
Plus if it wasant for China, neo-liberalism would have fallen over long ago. Capitalists need that huge pool of slave workers in China.
Every boardroom in the world should have a picture of Deng Xiaopeng up in it. He did more than Reagan, Thatcher, Douglas, Hawke, Keating, Mulroney, Tebbit, Lawson, Lamont, Howe, Douglas, Prebble, Lange, Volker, Clinton, Summers, et al ever did for neo-liberal capitalism.
The Labour party if in government will implement a policy of banning sales of residential houses to people who live overseas and not in NZ.
John Key says this will be in breach of a number of free trade agreements.
Therefore the free trade agreements restrict the ability of our Parliament to pass what laws it wishes – i.e. they directly affect our sovereignty.
The people of NZ have never agreed to have our Parliament restricted in such a way.
The free trade agreements are therefore invalid.
This has been apparent for some time but always ignored. NZ’s Parliament has no ability to enter into any FTA which attempts to limit our voting rights or sovereignty.
large areas of China are polluted by industrial and agricultural carcinogens. Avoid. Also China is in the middle of a massive unsustainable debt fuelled residential property bubble.
Two reasons Chinese might want to trade in their local property for NZ property.
No because their local laws don’t allow for private property even for their own citizens. Just the same as our local laws can be whatever we want. Like we insist on clear titles for instance which is a rarity in most countries.
My understanding of it is..
The FTA says (broadly) that kiwis seeking to do doing business in China are treated no worse than any other investor from any other country and not treated any different to their own citizens. There are various exemptions to that.
That means that it is reasonably hard to lease property in China. But that is largely because it is just hard to find suitable places there. It is usually more of a pain getting stuff past border controls or even figuring out how to deal with the distribution networks. At least that is what people I know doing business there say. They often go through distributors in HK even now.
Similarly we can put largely whatever restrictions we want on purchasing property. However we cannot give other citizens from countries better access than we give the Chinese or the aussies and depending on how the FTA’s are written some other countries..
Foreign buyers are not completely banned, from my reading of the policy, and feel free to correct me if i have got this wrong,
Foreign buyers who are not resident in New Zealand can buy land and build upon it within a year, i assume that they then have a year to sell that property or become resident,
i doubt whether any Government we have an FTA with will object to that, the Labour policy simply attempts to shut out foreign speculators buying existing houses…
Yes and there doesn’t seem to be an explanation around that exception. Why would that exemption be any use? I don’t buy the “adds to the housing stock” argument.
vto, but it would add to the housing stock, IF foreign investors are prepared to buy land and build upon it they are entitled to make an amount of profit from selling that house to a person resident in New Zealand,and pay any tax due i might add,
The whole ban on foreign residents buying existing property isn’t a big deal in my opinion and will probably result in demand shrinking by 2-5%, i see no negative in the policy for New Zealands residents and citizens,
The only small niggle i have is that with the Australians being exempt from the proposal we may find that while British and Asian speculators are driven out of the market that the demand from Australian speculators grows as their dollar value and higher wage rates will then make them the ‘wealthiest buyers’ and having British and Asian buyers with more wealth than them may yet prove to have held that Australian speculation in our housing market in check to a certain extent…
Well yes I suppose it could add to the housing stock…. but it kind of defeats the purpose of the policy as foreigners will simply look to get their bolthole by building new rather than buy existing. Overall the effect could be pretty similar to the current result, pre-policy.
2-5% is a significant chunk in my experience. Vary the demand side by that amount and it will have an effect. But also bear in mind that affordable housing requires a multi-pronged solution – this is one of them prongs.
And I have seen with my own few eyes the very real bidding out of young families by a foreign buyer. And this is the other benefit of such a policy…
… it creates more ownership within the community and that makes a community stronger.
The family that was outbid went back to renting, with its attendant greater transience and weaker strength. Eventually they moved away.
The policy has two very positive features;
1. Drives down capital values. High capital values only benefit banks.
2. Leads to stronger ownership etc within the community as opposed to more transient renters.
vto, no not from my reading of the proposal, non residents can buy land and build on it but cannot hold either the built on land or bare land for more than a year,
The only bit of that i am unsure of is the total actual time they can hold the land, i am going to assume that they have just the 1 year to build and sell, that’s more positive ‘investment’ than allowing non-residents to buy existing houses and then hold them until the price has risen to a point where they are happy to sell and take the profit for doing nothing…
“It should be an outright ban on foreign ownership of anything in NZ.”
That really is a brave call. It would be fascinating to try. So you mean literally that New Zealansd would have zero foreign direct investment? That has never been acheived in modern times by any nation. But I guess we could be the first.
OK. If you ban all incoming FDI, won’t you need to ban all New Zealand outgoing FDI because otherwise you will run out of capital?
Nope. Two reasons:
1.) The government can create more money.
2.) I expect other countries to do the same.
Are you going to ban imports too or is that still OK?
I didn’t mention trade but generally I’m supportive of it. It needs regulating of course else we end up with society becoming worse off as we’ve seen over the last few decades.
If Shearer gets into trouble with this housing policy banning foreigners he should not get defensive, rather he should attack harder. Show some mettle, show some aggression, take a fight directly to Key and make it hostile. Accuse Key of being a racist. Accuse Key of being deceptive and a liar. And don’t back down.
Shearer should have done this with the bad man ban too.
sheesh CV, if that is so then he should be outski. Is Shearer scared of everyone and everything? Is the Labour Party similarly scared like scaredy cats?
I don’t buy that if it is the reason for his slipper-wearing approach to every issue. If the right wing media are hostile then he should still stand up and not back down to them too.
Like Irishbill says on that other post, middle NZ are not stupid. And where they go the media will generally go too.
After all, why is Shearer there? He only has one life like most of us (apparently) so why doesn’t he grab it by the balls? To be or not to be …….. surely
sheesh CV, if that is so then he should be outski. Is Shearer scared of everyone and everything? Is the Labour Party similarly scared like scaredy cats?
Not scared of their own dissenting MPs and party members
OK I confess I can’t demonstrate that the MSM is left wing. I take it back.
I am sure that the MSM is stupid, produces mostly rubbish, and is (with a few exceptions) not worth reading. I think because I find it irritating, I have a tendency to assume it is left wing, but I see now that is unfair of me. So I withdraw and apologise.
+1. Your comments are usually worth reading srylands. I may not always agree with them but at least you explain your reasoning well, even when you are taking the piss.
Ah you have just been reading the fools at KiwiBlog and Whaleoil. While some journos may be left leaning, their bosses running the few remaining media companies are most definitely not – they’re mostly interested in money. And generally you make money by sucking up to the lowest possible common denominator.
That lower standard usually equates to talkback, comments on whaleoil, reality TV, paul henry, and seven#. In other words absolutely convinced of their own moral rectitude despite the occasional lapses into fornication, fighting, bigotry, racism, and beating on the missus while absolutely paranoidly certain that everyone else is getting a better deal out of life than they are. And too stupid or lazy to look stuff up.
Seen a mirror lately?
(I do so love it when someone gives me the straight line..)
I listened to a great episode of the Food Programme (mp3, 13MB 28 mins.) from BBC Radio 4 yesterday, covering food poverty. You can read the programme blurb here.
Food insecurity is a growing issue in the UK, linked with inadequate social welfare, lack of transportation and exacerbated by benefit “reforms”. Similar issues are faced by many New Zealanders as we have seen from the food in schools issue in recent months.
Frustrating time listening to a Mr Wall of an Auckland Real Estate firm attacking Shearer on Morning Report, accusing him of racism, xenophobia and basically not having a clue with the new policy for sales of housing to non-resident foreigners..
Mr Wall talked about NZ being built on immigration when he should have known that the Labour policy cøncerned overseas, non-resident owners. He did not know that similar laws were current in several countries but pronounced on how hard the new law would be to enforce “because in most of the cases he dealt with (20 per year, high end sales) he didn’t even know who the parties in the deal were.” Several times he said that he “didn’t know about that” but still continued to make comments.
How did they ever pick him for his ability to add to our sum general knowledge?
Finally there were two good comments from listeners who heard the same self-serving ignorance both of Labour’s policy and the outside world.
My God……..I recognise the guy……..one of those mouthy know it all (according only to blatant self-interest and sense of superiority) yuppie pricks. Vanity !!!!
LOL – thanks for the Denizen link. What a dork! He must have been down on real estate sales and desperate for income.
I initially got angry at that RNZ interview – and then decided that if I was looking to buy real estate in Auckland, Wall would immediately go on my “don’t touch with a barge pole” list – as slimy, ignorant and untrustworthy. Talk about how not to sell yourself!
RNZ pridefully holds itself as the centre of mature, technically informed expression. That is becoming more of a laugh everyday.
Who the hell in RNZ devised to have a Mr Wall from Wall Real Estate vent his self-interested spleen about policy concerned with foreign non-resident buyers ? Any bets that Mr Wall is a mate or a mate of a mate of someone in RNZ who could jack it up for Mr Wall and his ilk ?
His company deals extensively with the very people the policy is concerned about. Oh no, the policy is all racist shit according to the patently self interested Mr Wall. A policy he’d expect to hear from the racist Invercargill taxi rider he spits, in his mock rounded vowels.
RNZ has allowed Mr Wall to publicise himself as the go-to man when/if such a policy is implemented. It is outrageous that RNZ presents that sort of contribution from the likes of Mr Wall as expert, well-informed, uninterested.
Well done RNZ. Dumbing down is the order of the day.
That one is hardly worth the effort of raising the spittle to direct His way, when asked about the fact that Kiwi’s cannot buy property in China the liquid excrement flowed,
”Oh i don’t know what goes on in China” says He, jesus doesn’t such utter sh*t make you see violent shades of red…
North
Don’t concentrate your spleen on our only public broadcasting service that still is standing after the right-wing earthquake. If there’s something wrong mention it but don’t drop s..t from a great height. Someone in government may be listening and the next thing we know, is that Radionz is being downsized because the public find it unsatisfactory – and it’ll all be your fault! Then we’ll all be sorry. I have the feeling that the gubmint often runs on anecdote when it matches the direction they would like to take.
Listen to some other sites (commercial or student) and let us know how they are. That would be interesting as I don’t do that much. By the time that the good vibes from advertisements for elkhorn nostrums or whatever have been heard a few times it’s goodbye from me.
If I don’t like things on Radionz I’ll probably let them know and why. Why don’t you do the same instead of dissing them so strongly.
I CANNOT agree that my comment – “RNZ……becoming more of a laugh everyday” (the wheeling in of sham commentators I mean, obviously), nor my suspicions as to how/why Mr Wall was asked to comment/rant in the first place, nor my sardonic thanks to RNZ for the brilliance of its impartial, informative invitees (not)…..amounts to venting my spleen or dropping shit from a great height.
I AM NOT about to take seriously your fear that my comment may activate the dark forces to cancel RNZ.
I AM NOT about to take your direction to listen to “other sites (commercial or student)” and report back to you, firstly because I can’t handle the constant inane guffawing one finds on such “sites”, and secondly because you don’t seem to have expended the effort to do so yourself.
I AM about to ignore the busybody in you. You who misrepresents how I said what I said, and then, just by the way, fails to venture any view on the question.
If then it’s a case of my styles your riles…….tough. Rile away !
The deadline for submissions re the consitiutional review is the 31st (tomorrow).
Does anyone know for sure, if that means today is the last day to get one in, or tomorrow is the last day to submit?
Really don’t have much time today (shouldn’t be here….)
“Send your submission
Please send us your submission by 5pm 31 July 2013.
You can make a submission in a number of ways:
Make a submission online
Fill out the quick submission form and post it to us.
Email a submission to constitutionalreview@justice.govt.nz with “CAP submission” in the subject line. You can attach documents to your email.
Or you can post a submission to:
Cheers VV.
Youre a champion.
I’ve only got a rough outline and I really need to sit down and spend a couple of hours on it.
Time I’ve got tomorrow but not today.
A Herald-poll shows that the majority of respondents support the children of Beneficiaries being included in the Working for Families Tax Credit scheme,
Admittedly only a small poll of 700 but a small ray of light nonetheless,” If beneficiaries want working for tax credits they can get a job”, those words which finally severed any desire for me to either support or vote for Labour,
Just how much denigration can the children of beneficiaries be expected to weather, tax their meager income for spurious reasons, directly cut their meager income for even more spurious reasons, then deny them income from a government redistribution where hand over heart that government dared suggest that the children of families with $60,000 of income were more deserving,
Indulging in the above doesn’t make ‘bad parents’, indulging in the above makes bad parenting a f**king government policy…
O would go along with that – you just have to recognize that some people are not worth much (professionally) – you have a $1 skill – you can sell it for $1.
Actually you point out a weakness in Lanthanide’s comment. What one is paid is not a reflection on what they are worth. If this is so, the person looking after, for example, your sick mother in hospital, or someone growing food that you eat, would be considered worth less than a lying and cheating fraudster in the financial system commanding oodles of bonuses whilst undermining the entire functioning of our society.
However, is there anyone working who doesn’t deserve to be paid wages or a salary that covers their living costs?
It appears that rather a lot of employers think this is o.k.
O would go along with that – you just have to recognize that some people are not worth much (professionally) – you have a $1 skill – you can sell it for $1.
Sure, as long as you recognise that some employers are so shit, workers should be paid bonuses for putting up with their BS.
Fair enough – I agree on that point. My wife works for the Auckland Council and they are terrible – she deserves more for putting up with them (Not that she will get it mind).
But at lease we have been able to agree that some people simply do not have skills that are worth much and are compensated as such.
You can wish all you like but if workers are paid more than their marginal output value the business goes bust.
You must have no experience in running a business. I can tell you that the equaion is simple. Some workers produce more than otehrs but at the margin there will be a worker who is producing marginally more than his/her wages. If wages are regulated upwards beyond that break even point that worker has to go.
Probably because once you’ve read more than one or two simplistic libertarian Hayek/Friedman internet raves, it becomes hard to go back to such a trite view of the world.
Something is clearly wrong with the way we do things, working out new ways that have better results will never be solved by continuing to believe that old answers are working.
If a country continues to follow rubbish notions of what can and can’t be done, then, Srylands, they go bust like America, Greece, Britain, Ireland and New Zealand (we are all in massive debt are we not?) or become dependant on power-grabbers who have an obsession with gaining materially and whom have very little concern for the wellbeing of people.
If someone is growing carrots, and the owner can’t afford to pay him or her a living wage, then put the price of the carrots up, Noddy.
No, wait, I have an idea, we can’t put the price of carrots up because we have decided we can’t (or people won’t buy them for that price) so we will just put the workers wages down.
…Oh, what? the worker can’t afford to pay rent and food? I know we will give him handouts. Or better yet we will give him a loan to buy his own house. That way the workers will feel wealthier than they really are and won’t complain!
….Oh what? the worker can’t afford to pay back the debt?
~ Oh I know we will just borrow off other countries to cover up the little problem
…Oh What?? That didn’t work?
~Oh I know, we will bundle the debts up into little packages and sell them as AA investments
…Oh What?? people aren’t repaying their mortgages and the banks have gone bust?
~Oh I know, we will get the workers to pay for the bailout ….
The reason that wages are low is because employers want more profit than is possible. Or perhaps technology has lead us into this place of not-enough-profits-for-neccesities. Or perhaps it is that those with capital prefer to speculate on futures markets (thereby raising the prices falsely). Perhaps we need to change the way we organize ourselves.
The invisible hand can go and fuck itself for a start.
“We can’t put the price of carrots up because people won’t buy them for that price.”
Stop growing carrots. Sell house in Levin. Buy vineyard in Martinborough. Make wine. Run cool concerts in summer. Incentivise workers with profit sharing scheme. Everyone is happy.
Import carrots from Tasmania.
All the workers applaud by an invisible hand-clap 🙂
Well I might have agreed with you had you left out the bit about importing the carrots from Tasmania. If people won’t buy the carrots at a decent price and haven’t land to grow them themselves then they can jolly well go without.
I’m unsure what makes you think that the invisible hand has any time for niceties such as applauding…(perhaps the same notion that leads you to believe the invisible hand sorts our organizational problems out for us….)
but…but…Colonial Viper…you missed something there…
People go hungry (or into debt) so that some others may experience the freedom to do what they want regardless [of whether they are screwing anyone else]…especially they should be able to make as big a profit as their heart’s desire, and that is what is really important now, isn’t it?
Self interest properly understood would mean that the wealthy elite would not let things get too out of balance. The example of the French Revolution should not be so far from their minds, for instance. The wealthy elite enabled Roosevelt to act during the Depression, making significant concessions to the masses, while essentially saving the system of capitalism.
Unfortunately what we have now amongst the elite is self interest misunderstood.
They’ll bury themselves and us with them over the next 20-30 years.
PS a lot of these “rich” people are going to find themselves very poor in the coming years, as their paper wealth becomes worthless for exchange for real goods and services.
@ C.V
Although I understand what you are getting at, and the form of self interest you speak of is certainly healthier than the narrow self interest that has come to be the rule of the day, I really don’t think that a society that believes in an organizing principle of self interest is going to get far.
Societies come together for the benefits that mutual help and cooperation provides. Trying to ignore cooperation and turn the main organizing principle into one of self interest is never going to get far because it goes against the reality of why we clump together in the first place (or more scientifically speaking; that we are a ‘social animal’); i.e. working in groups leads to a better quality of life for the whole tribe; if this wasn’t the case, people wouldn’t bother.
Surely a far more productive organizing principle is to focus on the very qualities that leads to the intended aim–a better quality of life–not those that lead us to pull apart?
I really don’t think that a society that believes in an organizing principle of self interest is going to get far.
In olden times people believed that what was good for their nation was good for themselves. Eg. “For King and Country”. In earlier times they believed in the good of their tribe, their clan, etc.
These days the Left has become so intellectually and rationally clever that there is little remaining for people to believe in.
these City bankers are being handsomely rewarded for bringing the global financial system to the brink of collapse. While collecting salaries of between £500,000 and £10 million, leading City bankers to destroy £7 of social value for every pound in value they generate.
For every £1 they are paid, childcare workers generate between £7 and £9.50 worth of benefits to society.
For a salary of between £50,000 and £12 million, top advertising executives destroy £11 of value for every pound in value they generate.
We estimated, however, that for every £1 they are paid [hospital cleaners], over £10 in social value is generated.
For a salary of between £75,000 and £200,000 tax accountants destroy £47 of value for every pound in value they generate.
Our model projects that for every £1 of value spent on wages, £12 of value will be generated.
See, I’m quite happy for people to be paid what they’re worth but the rich won’t like it because they’d owe the rest of us billions of dollars.
+1 all it does is artificially subsidize employers much a like the accomodation supplement subsidizes and therefore inflates rent. I’d imagine that if supplements wern’t propping up the rental market an investment property would become a whole lot more unattractive. I’d dare say it would take more heat out of the housing market than investor retsrictions…
Aha, also interest payments can be deducted from PAYE so why wouldn’t the middle class pile into ‘investment housing’ en masse with such subsidies,
Don’t tho expect Labour to change any of that, they are after-all fighting with National for a slice of that middle classes vote and good luck to them,
National wont touch Working for Families either in spite of the Slippery little Shyster when in opposition venting fit to burst a blood vessel that WfW is ‘Communism’…
This is the real issue; ensuring people are paid a wage they can live on.
I will add though, that if NZ is going to move into supplementing wages with welfare, as it appears to be doing, then NZers need to be clearly informed and realise the extent of this welfare and drop the whole stigma of receiving welfare.
If governments are going to support landlords and employees by supplementing their requirement to charge higher rents than people can afford and wages that people can’t afford, then governments are going to have to quit the whole anti-welfare memes that they consistently encourage in order to get votes.
If governments persist in ensuring that those on welfare are obligated to feel shame for receiving help, (and as Cricklewood pointed out this help immediately transfers into support for businesses and landlords) then governments need to also ensure that employers and landlords are made to feel obligated to provide wages and ask for rents that are affordable without requiring governments to make up the shortfall.
In my opinion the issue of ‘welfare costs’ needs to be transformed into an issue of ensuring good jobs are available to all. This is the most positive and effective way of clearing up the matter for all NZers.
Attended a free New Economics Foundation workshop – run by Auckland Council (believe it or not), and one of their publications deals with the issue of remuneration vs value.
A Bit Rich (2009) compares the anomaly created in valuing different occupations, and the SROI (Social Return on Investment) and community impact of different types of work.
“We have tested our theory by taking a close look at a sample of highly paid and low paid jobs. We found that some of the most highly paid benefit us least, and some of the lowest-paid benefit us most. Although this will not always hold, it does point to a massive flaw in the system and highlights the need for reform. “
Excerpts: “….While collecting salaries of between £500,000 and £10 million, leading City bankers to destroy £7 of social value for every pound in value they generate.”
“…. For every £1 they are paid, childcare workers generate between £7 and £9.50 worth of benefits to society.”
Interesting read, and worth the read – even if only to provide interesting debates on these topics.
I agree thoroughly and have been realising lately that the belief that one is worth more when one is paid more is really a problem for social cohesion. I also think it is hard for humans to not believe that they are worth more when paid a lot more than others.
Trouble is, this is a false belief, noone is worth more just because they are paid more. Every human is worth the same, unless perhaps a human who is doing a great deal of good for others, in which case, perhaps they are worth more…to society at least.
As the information you have shared points out most astutely; some of the people providing the most important services are paid the least and some who are destroying our society are being paid the most. Kind of scuppers the idea that a person is worth more depending on the pay they happen to receive.
Agreed. And part of the problem is the “neoliberal” propaganda that private profit-focused businesses contribute more to society than than public sector work. Also undervalued is most of the work that cares for, educates, helps, heals and nurtures people.
Attended a free New Economics Foundation workshop – run by Auckland Council (believe it or not), and one of their publications deals with the issue of remuneration vs value.
A Bit Rich (2009) compares the anomaly created in valuing different occupations, and the SROI (Social Return on Investment) and community impact of different types of work.
“We have tested our theory by taking a close look at a sample of highly paid and low paid jobs. We found that some of the most highly paid benefit us least, and some of the lowest-paid benefit us most. Although this will not always hold, it does point to a massive flaw in the system and highlights the need for reform. “
Excerpts: “….While collecting salaries of between £500,000 and £10 million, leading City bankers to destroy £7 of social value for every pound in value they generate.”
“…. For every £1 they are paid, childcare workers generate between £7 and £9.50 worth of benefits to society.”
Interesting read, and worth the read – even if only to provide interesting debates on these topics.
Two current issues need a great deal more transparency – the GCSB legislation and the Trans- Pacific Partnership negotiations, writes Gerald McGhie.
[ From an earlier Herald articile : “Gerald McGhie is a former career diplomat who served as ambassador to Moscow and Seoul, High Commissioner to Port Moresby and Commissioner in Hong Kong. Now retired, he is a past director of the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs and was chairman of the New Zealand chapter of Transparency International.”
Penny, i detect from the double post a level of anger, so much so that you have been unable to delete one of them,
Your question is self evident, coz it’s His blog and he can, just as in the final analysis LPrent can give someone a spanking here at the Standard for behavior one day and ignore the same behavior from another the next,
Bomber probably got sick of some of your more Loooooong efforts at posting a comment, i quite often do here on the Standard and simply skim such efforts as i scroll my way down the page…
Question Time today – should be interesting after the two week break and what has happened in that time.
Shearer has his usual – twice (1 and 11) and Peters also has one at Q6. Norman is still on the “Dunne” case(Q2), and Parker is on ‘house price’ duty (Q4). Hipkins is going to give us another’Minister of Education’ moment; and Eugenie Sage is on water safety/quality.
The rest are Nat Patsy questions.
Questions to Ministers
1.DAVID SHEARER to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements?
2.Dr RUSSEL NORMAN to the Prime Minister: Did his Chief of Staff, Wayne Eagleson, advise Parliamentary Service that United Future Leader Hon Peter Dunne had agreed to cooperate with the Henry inquiry and had consented to releasing his electronic phone logs; if so, why?
4.Hon DAVID PARKER to the Minister of Finance: Does he stand by his statement that “High house prices matter because many New Zealanders spend a large portion of their incomes on housing and that has helped fuel household debt and contribute to damaging imbalances in the economy”?
6.Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements?
7.EUGENIE SAGE to the Minister for the Environment: What percentage of sites identified as a river in the Suitability for Swimming indicator report released yesterday were categorised as “Very Good” or “Good” and therefore were safe for swimming?
9.CHRIS HIPKINS to the Minister of Education: Does she agree with the Minister of Finance that “The Government is focusing on ensuring that every teacher put in front of our children is competent”?
11.DAVID SHEARER to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements?
?
Pretty hard hitting stuff all round, but especially from Shearer.
Why is it that the Greens, with far less parliamentary experience, almost always seem to do far better in parliament? Are Labour actually trying?
By bringing up their housing policy, all Shearer and Parker did is open themselves up to Key etc making disparaging remarks, as nice soundbites for the MSM Fran Mold may be back in the fold, but there was so much more they could have been winning hits on but …………………
Alan Ray designer of CTV building has taken legal action to stop surveillance of his professional background. Ask the GCSB they’ll know. What a cheek. Its wonderful how these bare-faced scammers as he was, though within the law, can evade taking responsibility.
I remember that he was known for designing buildings so they just achieved building requirements, therefore being efficient no doubt (utilizing a particular commodity or product with the least waste of resources or effort) which is usually judged in NZ as being cheapest.
A very engaging NZ expert spoke on Radionz this morning. He is into DNA sequencing and tracing evolution through tests that can be done. Very interesting. Says NZ is very important and that we and the Galpagos Islands are important sites in the world. Though he can’t get funding in NZ and we don’t seem enough about our environmental history and present situation to support needed study. So he’s working in Australia. He says that the kiwi is originally Australian!!
Dna sequencing expert interesting insightful http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon
Tuesday 30/7/13
Feature Guest – Professor Alan Cooper (27′ 54″ )
10:07 Director of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA at the University of
Adelaide. Alan’s a former Wellingtonian who is leading groundbreaking research which uses ancient DNA to record and study evolutionary processes in real time, especially those associated with environmental change.
He says that many clever talented people come from NZ but can’t get work or funding. And I started thinking yes, we came, we saw, we conquered the land and over-ran Maori and have settled into taking what we wanted that we could sell. We are pragmatic, we are ‘practical’, we have ‘common sense’.
We don’t have a real love for our country or each other in society or it would pervade government as well. We are happy if we can get lots of money together, live in a gated community and rumble about the lazy b..s unemployed and the over-fertile women looking to the government to carry their responsibilities.
The country was developed as a land speculation scam where people either came out of desperation from a Britain in recession, enticed here with extravagant promises and unreal scenarios of being in the tropics of the South Pacific, or sold land that hadn’t even been made available by Maori, or if it had, had not been formalised and paid for.
And we were unable to find a working system between landowning farmers, business and unions just as we were reaching a more advanced state of development. Which had largely been achieved through the experience overseas from WW2 and the more sophisticated refugees and new wave of immigrants after the war. Then came defensive reaction to Britain joining the EU and fear that we would be locked out of replacement markets for our primary produce. So we dropped all our protections to show our sincerity and determination to have free borders and dropped the country in a huge cow pat.
Along came neo liberalism, the right wing jumped right in and are prepared to go to jackboot stage as they seek to mould a country to their own personal wishes and interests. Now we have dropped our progressive tax system and brought in high GST that impacts on nearly all financial transactions, and apart from the most wealthy, the middle class are squeezed and the poorer get the toothpaste tube when it is almost flat.
And no hope for better economic management from either major political party which would return us to an enterprising nation having employment for us all which would automatically produce better conditions – that is the final nail in the coffin.
Andrea Vance’s phone records were given by Datacom to Henry inquiry without request and Henry sent them back !!! carter apologises … question time in the house in 20 mins shd be fun !!
A new age friend of mine (yeah, I know), made the statement recently that the problem with protesting against something is that it is inherently negative and doesn’t say what one actually wants. I generally find these kinds of statements to be idiotic and existing in a vaccum that is disconnected from political reality, but I do take the point that being anti- something without being pro- something can be a problem sometimes (depending on context). On the other hand, sometimes you just have to stand up and say fuck off.
I was thinking about it more today and realised that most activists I know and follow do seem to know what they want as much as what they trying to stop. And the more I think about it the more I am struggling to see protests that have been important to me where we were fighting against something without there being a clear sense of fighting for something as well.
So I thought I would ask. When you are protesting something are you thinking about what you want as much as what you don’t want? Am particularly interested in how activists have seen this over time as specific issues have been addressed and then things have moved on.
Any examples of purely ‘anti’ protests?
I’d also like to know to what extent the whole negative/positive thing gets discussed as strategy in activist circles. Is the whole anti/pro dichotomy a complete nonsense?
Weka, I think it entirely depends on what the situation is, and that there doesn’t necessarily need to be a flip side, what one desires, as an alternative, to what one doesn’t desire. You talk about a dichotomy and as humans I wonder if we often fall into the trap of dichotomous thinking. If you don’t want this then you must want that, kind of thinking.
Why must we justify our objection to something by introducing a nice and positive counter solution to make others feel better about what we do? (I’m thinking of your new age friend here) Sometimes the only thing that needs to be said is “No”. Of course we always need to fully understand why we fight for a certain outcome otherwise it is a meaningless effort.. I’d be surprised that anyone wouldn’t have a full grasp of the holistic value of what they are objecting to as they are marching along and chanting. But then again I have met serial protesters while out a protest. I was speaking with another woman a couple of years ago who said she hadn’t seen me out before. I replied, that I can’t get to everything and like to save my energy for a real and focused fight. We also have differing empathies and allegiances. I wondered if this person was more like a rent-a-crowd stand in, “what ever’s going, I’m in” kind of thing. Maybe this is an example of being purely “anti” without giving much thought to why, and what is beyond. I believe this example is an exception and most folks out protesting have a firmer grasp of their issue than this.
During some protests the “positive” speaks for itself alongside the “negative” and are interwoven. Oppose the GCSB bill?/ (Negative) You want to retain your most basic right to privacy. (Positive) Look at all the placards in the photo’s online. Those two themes appeared equally in the protesters forms of expression.
Can’t speak for strategy discussion in activists group,(in recent years at least) just my observations. As it is I am unavoidably surrounded by folks not of my ilk, right wingers, non voters and the odd new ager and the odd ultra conservative religious person. I find they will always make the same kind of statement as your friend. I agree that they “exist in a vacuum that is disconnected from political reality” . I find these kinds of statements infuriating for many reasons but the main one is that because this ignorance and judgement about protesting means for they are enabling the “enemy” for want of a better word. Inaction of the masses leads to the loss of democracy. So you know what I reckon, keep doing what you do and don’t be sidetracked by those who would make believe you’re “negative and therefore that’s a problem” because you make a stand.
I was anti-tour and pro-equality, I was anti-foreshore and seabed legislation and pro-Māori rights, I am anti-exploitation and pro-environment. I don’t think the anti bit undermines the pro bit, they both co-exist. They have a relationship and are both entwined and you can’t have one without the other. In other words being anti-something is not possible without being pro-something even if at the time we don’t express it as such or aren’t even conscious of it. For me it is part of the fabric of existence and the dichotomies are inherent within the system, and manifested as a human attribute much like the almost automatic ability to catagorise or anthropomorphise what we experience around us.
Anti-anti democracy – and ‘everything’ that flows from anti democratic tendencies in society. And as two negatives make a positive 🙂
Less trite answer? I think if some future vision isn’t borne in mind and modes of organising built around values of that future vision (eg, always pushing more democratic means of organising while resisting authoritarian habits), then protest becomes (sometimes) winning battles against the backdrop of a war that will inevitability be lost.
(Over 21 ‘dislikes’ – so must have jammed a few buttons on full! 🙂
MEDIA ALERT: Auckland Mayoral candidate Penny Bright:
“Will National Party MP Nikki Kaye do the right thing and vote against the GCSB Bill?
“Over 500 signatures have been collected, in Auckland Central, for a petition to National MP for Auckland Central Nikki Kaye, which says:
“The will of the people is the basis of the authority of Government.”
We, the undersigned, call upon YOU, as an MP, to defend the lawful human rights of New Zealanders to privacy, freedom of association and freedom of expression – that is – to oppose arbitrary search and surveillance by the State over citizens.
If YOU, as an MP, vote for this GCSB Bill, which will allow widespread spying on New Zealanders, we hereby PLEDGE to campaign against your re-election in 2014, and to encourage our families, neighbours and workmates to do the same. ”
“These petitions are now with the overnight courier, destined for Parliament, and should arrive in time for the National caucus meeting, which, as I understand it, should be meeting at 10am, Tuesday 30 July 2013.”
“If there is ONE thing that politicians understand – it is VOTES!
My very strong recommendation is that as many people as possible, email all National MPs, Peter Dunne (now ‘Independent’), and the DEFENDANT – ACT Party Leader and MP for Epsom, John Banks, who supported the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill, at it’s first reading, and urge them NOT to support this Bill, ” says Auckland Mayoral candidate Penny Bright.
A party vote was called for on the question, That the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill be reported back to the House by 26 July 2013, and that the Intelligence and Security Committee have authority to meet at any time while the House is sitting (except during oral questions), during an evening on a day on which there has been a sitting of the House, and on a Friday in a week in which there has been a sitting of the House, despite Standing Orders 188 and 191(1)(b) and (c).
Ayes 61 New Zealand National 59; ACT New Zealand 1; United Future 1.
Noes 57 New Zealand Labour 33; Green Party 13; New Zealand First 7; Maori Party 3; Independent: Horan.
Motion agreed to.
“The will of the people is the basis of the authority of Government.”
I call upon YOU, as an MP, to defend the lawful human rights of New Zealanders to privacy, freedom of association and freedom of expression – that is – to oppose arbitrary search and surveillance by the State over citizens.
If YOU, as an MP, vote for this GCSB Bill, which will allow widespread spying on New Zealanders, I hereby PLEDGE to campaign against your re-election in 2014, and to encourage my family, neighbours and workmates to do the same. ”
It is the result of investigations about the Ahmed Zaoui case, and the background we have never been told. It apparently raises significant questions about our intelligence services:
he documentary feature film Behind The Shroud is scheduled to broadcast for the first time on New Zealand television on FaceTV and Sky channel 83 on Monday August 5 at 8pm.
Behind The Shroud was researched and directed by me [Manning] and was produced over a seven year period.
Behind The Shroud reveals for the first time secret testimonies of witnesses who appeared before the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security’s secret hearings into the Ahmed Zaoui case.
This testimony is highly relevant today as we all debate how we as New Zealanders can all take a role in resisting gross abuses against our civil liberties and the excessive use of the State’s intelligence agency powers.
The frequency of the double saved comments is increasing damnit. I actually have a fix for it (full MD5 to replace the existing check, increased size of the recent comment queue, an increased timeout, and flushing to auto-mod if it times out).
BUT I coded it into a plugin designed for wordpress 3.6 – which last time I looked had just made it to RC2….. Ummm. wait I think..
Can’t find any comment on it above……………Geoffrey Palmer on Campbell Live. A powerful statement. Had “Churchillian” flashing across my head a coupla times. Which surprised me.
So, so significant. He gave a clear, stern admonishment to New Zealand that democracy and our rights are under threat.
Let’s see the ShonKey Python response – the level of response will say SO much.
In a Vaudeville moment I see ShonKeyPython giving Jamie-Lee Ross his next gig ???
Yes. I watched Palmer on Campbell Live. He was very good. Very clear. Good journos everywhere would’ve been nodding their heads in agreement. So would most of the viewers I expect.
His awkward dancing at a Pacific Islands forum did him in. Times have changed. John Key’s awkward dancing just seems to generate smiles, and even his planking probably increased his poll support. 🙂
Some of us have worthless share certificates to remind us.
It begs the question how this individual has been allowed to get near the finance markets since…
Allan Hawkins was apparently sentenced for six (6) years for 7 charges of fraud and conspiracy in 1993.
That’s an example of what I complained of a day or so ago – (I was referring then to ShonKey Python and the MSM, especially television) – they’re fucking around with the nation’s psyche, our democracy, our values.
Sadly that sort of stuff is business as usual in the public sense now. Our morals have been deadened.
Open access notablesIce acceleration and rotation in the Greenland Ice Sheet interior in recent decades, Løkkegaard et al., Communications Earth & Environment:In the past two decades, mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet has accelerated, partly due to the speedup of glaciers. However, uncertainty in speed derived from satellite products ...
Buzz from the Beehive A statement from Children’s Minister Karen Chhour – yet to be posted on the Government’s official website – arrived in Point of Order’s email in-tray last night. It welcomes the High Court ruling on whether the Waitangi Tribunal can demand she appear before it. It does ...
Mr Bombastic:Ironically, the media the academic experts wanted is, in many ways, the media they got. In place of the tyrannical editors of yesteryear, advancing without fear or favour the interests of the ruling class; the New Zealand news media of today boasts a troop of enlightened journalists dedicated to ...
It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...
In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...
Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder.In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére SosouMarket gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...
Buzz from the Beehive Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ...
Morning in London Mother hugs beloved daughter outside the converted shoe factory in which she is living.Afternoon in London Travelling writer takes himself and his wrist down to A&E, just to be sure. Read more ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – The recent announcement of the University Advisory Group, chaired by Sir Peter Gluckman, makes very clear where the Government’s focus and priorities lie. The remit of the Advisory Group is that Group members will consider challenges and opportunities for improvement in the university sector including: ...
Eric Crampton writes – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand desperately wants to find reasons to have workstreams in climate change. It makes little sense. They’ve run another stress test on the banks looking to see if they could find a prudential regulation case. They couldn’t. They ...
Rob MacCullough writes – Pundits from the left and the right are arguing that National’s Fast Track Bill that is designed to speed up infrastructure decisions could end up becoming mired in a cesspool of corruption. Political commentator ...
Looking at the headlines this morning it’s hard to feel anything other than pessimistic about the future of humanity.Note that I’m not speaking about the future of mankind, but the survival of our humanity. The values that we believe in seem to be ebbing away, by the day.Perhaps every generation ...
Swabbing mixed breed baby chicks to test for avian influenzaUh oh. Bird flu – often deadly to humans – is not only being transmitted from infected birds to dairy cows, but is now travelling between dairy cows. As of last Friday, Bloomberg News reports, there were 32 American dairy herds ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
What is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...
Buzz from the Beehive Reactions to news of the government’s readiness to make urgent changes to “the resource management system” through a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) suggest a balanced approach is being taken. The Taxpayers’ Union says the proposed changes don’t go far enough. Greenpeace says ...
I’m starting to wonder if Anna Burns-Francis might be the best political interviewer we’ve got. That might sound unlikely to you, it came as a bit of a surprise to me.Jack Tame can be excellent, but has some pretty average days. I like Rebecca Wright on Newshub, she asks good ...
Chris Trotter writes – Willie Jackson is said to be planning a “media summit” to discuss “the state of the media and how to protect Fourth Estate Journalism”. Not only does the Editor of The Daily Blog, Martyn Bradbury, think this is a good idea, but he has also ...
Graeme Edgeler writes – This morning [April 21], the Wellington High Court is hearing a judicial review brought by Hon. Karen Chhour, the Minister for Children, against a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal. This is unusual, judicial reviews are much more likely to brought against ministers, rather than ...
Both of Parliament’s watchdogs have now ripped into the Government’s Fast-track Approvals Bill. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s political economy and beyond on the morning of Tuesday, April 23 are:The Lead: The Auditor General,John Ryan, has joined the ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah SpengemanPeople wait to board an electric bus in Pune, India. (Image credit: courtesy of ITDP) Public transportation riders in Pune, India, love the city’s new electric buses so much they will actually skip an older diesel bus that ...
The infrastructure industry yesterday issued a “hurry up” message to the Government, telling it to get cracking on developing a pipeline of infrastructure projects.The hiatus around the change of Government has seen some major projects cancelled and others delayed, and there is uncertainty about what will happen with the new ...
Hi,Over the weekend I revisited a podcast I really adore, Dead Eyes. It’s about a guy who got fired from Band of Brothers over two decades ago because Tom Hanks said he had “dead eyes”.If you don’t recall — 2001’s Band of Brothers was part of the emerging trend of ...
Buzz from the Beehive The 180 or so recipients of letters from the Government telling them how to submit infrastructure projects for “fast track” consideration includes some whose project applications previously have been rejected by the courts. News media were quick to feature these in their reports after RMA Reform Minister Chris ...
It would not be a desirable way to start your holiday by breaking your back, your head, or your wrist, but on our first hour in Singapore I gave it a try.We were chatting, last week, before we started a meeting of Hazel’s Enviro Trust, about the things that can ...
Calling all journalists, academics, planners, lawyers, political activists, environmentalists, and other members of the public who believe that the relationships between vested interests and politicians need to be scrutinised. We need to work together to make sure that the new Fast-Track Approvals Bill – currently being pushed through by the ...
Feel worried. Shane Jones and a couple of his Cabinet colleagues are about to be granted the power to override any and all objections to projects like dams, mines, roads etc even if: said projects will harm biodiversity, increase global warming and cause other environmental harms, and even if ...
Bryce Edwards writes- The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. ...
Michael Bassett writes – If you think there is a move afoot by the radical Maori fringe of New Zealand society to create a parallel system of government to the one that we elect at our triennial elections, you aren’t wrong. Over the last few days we have ...
Without a corresponding drop in interest rates, it’s doubtful any changes to the CCCFA will unleash a massive rush of home buyers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate on Monday, April 22 included:The Government making a ...
Sunday was a lazy day. I started watching Jack Tame on Q&A, the interviews are usually good for something to write about. Saying the things that the politicians won’t, but are quite possibly thinking. Things that are true and need to be extracted from between the lines.As you might know ...
In our Weekly Roundup last week we covered news from Auckland Transport that the WX1 Western Express is going to get an upgrade next year with double decker electric buses. As part of the announcement, AT also said “Since we introduced the WX1 Western Express last November we have seen ...
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 29 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Stats NZ releases its statutory report on Census 2023 tomorrow.Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivers a pre-Budget speech at ...
A listing of 29 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 14, 2024 thru Sat, April 20, 2024. Story of the week Our story of the week hinges on these words from the abstract of a fresh academic ...
The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. The Government says this will ...
This is a column to say thank you. So many of have been in touch since Mum died to say so many kind and thoughtful things. You’re wonderful, all of you. You’ve asked how we’re doing, how Dad’s doing. A little more realisation each day, of the irretrievable finality of ...
Identifying the engine type in your car is crucial for various reasons, including maintenance, repairs, and performance upgrades. Knowing the specific engine model allows you to access detailed technical information, locate compatible parts, and make informed decisions about modifications. This comprehensive guide will provide you with a step-by-step approach to ...
Introduction: The allure of racing is undeniable. The thrill of speed, the roar of engines, and the exhilaration of competition all contribute to the allure of this adrenaline-driven sport. For those who yearn to experience the pinnacle of racing, becoming a race car driver is the ultimate dream. However, the ...
Introduction Automobiles have become ubiquitous in modern society, serving as a primary mode of transportation and a symbol of economic growth and personal mobility. With countless vehicles traversing roads and highways worldwide, it begs the question: how many cars are there in the world? Determining the precise number is a ...
Maintaining a safe and reliable vehicle requires regular inspections. Whether it’s a routine maintenance checkup or a safety inspection, knowing how long the process will take can help you plan your day accordingly. This article delves into the factors that influence the duration of a car inspection and provides an ...
Mazda Motor Corporation, commonly known as Mazda, is a Japanese multinational automaker headquartered in Fuchu, Aki District, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The company was founded in 1920 as the Toyo Cork Kogyo Co., Ltd., and began producing vehicles in 1931. Mazda is primarily known for its production of passenger cars, but ...
Your car battery is an essential component that provides power to start your engine, operate your electrical systems, and store energy. Over time, batteries can weaken and lose their ability to hold a charge, which can lead to starting problems, power failures, and other issues. Replacing your battery before it ...
In most states, you cannot register a car without a valid driver’s license. However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. Exceptions to the RuleIf you are under 18 years old: In some states, you can register a car in your name even if you do not ...
Mazda, a Japanese automotive manufacturer with a rich history of innovation and engineering excellence, has emerged as a formidable player in the global car market. Known for its reputation of producing high-quality, fuel-efficient, and driver-oriented vehicles, Mazda has consistently garnered praise from industry experts and consumers alike. In this article, ...
Struts are an essential part of a car’s suspension system. They are responsible for supporting the weight of the car and damping the oscillations of the springs. Struts are typically made of steel or aluminum and are filled with hydraulic fluid. How Do Struts Work? Struts work by transferring the ...
Car registration is a mandatory process that all vehicle owners must complete annually. This process involves registering your car with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and paying an associated fee. The registration process ensures that your vehicle is properly licensed and insured, and helps law enforcement and other authorities ...
Zoom is a video conferencing service that allows you to share your screen, webcam, and audio with other participants. In addition to sharing your own audio, you can also share the audio from your computer with other participants. This can be useful for playing music, sharing presentations with audio, or ...
Building your own computer can be a rewarding and cost-effective way to get a high-performance machine tailored to your specific needs. However, it also requires careful planning and execution, and one of the most important factors to consider is the time it will take. The exact time it takes to ...
Sleep mode is a power-saving state that allows your computer to quickly resume operation without having to boot up from scratch. This can be useful if you need to step away from your computer for a short period of time but don’t want to shut it down completely. There are ...
Introduction Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT) has revolutionized the field of translation by harnessing the power of technology to assist human translators in their work. This innovative approach combines specialized software with human expertise to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of translations. In this comprehensive article, we will delve into the ...
In today’s digital age, mobile devices have become an indispensable part of our daily lives. Among the vast array of portable computing options available, iPads and tablet computers stand out as two prominent contenders. While both offer similar functionalities, there are subtle yet significant differences between these two devices. This ...
A computer is an electronic device that can be programmed to carry out a set of instructions. The basic components of a computer are the processor, memory, storage, input devices, and output devices. The Processor The processor, also known as the central processing unit (CPU), is the brain of the ...
Voice Memos is a convenient app on your iPhone that allows you to quickly record and store audio snippets. These recordings can be useful for a variety of purposes, such as taking notes, capturing ideas, or recording interviews. While you can listen to your voice memos on your iPhone, you ...
Laptop screens are essential for interacting with our devices and accessing information. However, when lines appear on the screen, it can be frustrating and disrupt productivity. Understanding the underlying causes of these lines is crucial for finding effective solutions. Types of Screen Lines Horizontal lines: Also known as scan ...
Right-clicking is a common and essential computer operation that allows users to access additional options and settings. While most desktop computers have dedicated right-click buttons on their mice, laptops often do not have these buttons due to space limitations. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on how to right-click ...
Powering up and shutting down your ASUS laptop is an essential task for any laptop user. Locating the power button can sometimes be a hassle, especially if you’re new to ASUS laptops. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on where to find the power button on different ASUS laptop ...
Dell laptops are renowned for their reliability, performance, and versatility. Whether you’re a student, a professional, or just someone who needs a reliable computing device, a Dell laptop can meet your needs. However, if you’re new to Dell laptops, you may be wondering how to get started. In this comprehensive ...
Two-thirds of the country think that “New Zealand’s economy is rigged to advantage the rich and powerful”. They also believe that “New Zealand needs a strong leader to take the country back from the rich and powerful”. These are just two of a handful of stunning new survey results released ...
In today’s digital world, screenshots have become an indispensable tool for communication and documentation. Whether you need to capture an important email, preserve a website page, or share an error message, screenshots allow you to quickly and easily preserve digital information. If you’re an Asus laptop user, there are several ...
A factory reset restores your Gateway laptop to its original factory settings, erasing all data, apps, and personalizations. This can be necessary to resolve software issues, remove viruses, or prepare your laptop for sale or transfer. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to factory reset your Gateway laptop: Method 1: ...
“You talking about me?”The neoliberal denigration of the past was nowhere more unrelenting than in its depiction of the public service. The Post Office and the Railways were held up as being both irremediably inefficient and scandalously over-manned. Playwright Roger Hall’s “Glide Time” caricatures were presented as accurate depictions of ...
Roger Partridge writes – When the Coalition Government took office last October, it inherited a country on a precipice. With persistent inflation, decades of insipid productivity growth and crises in healthcare, education, housing and law and order, it is no exaggeration to suggest New Zealand’s first-world status was ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – In 2022, the Curriculum Centre at the Ministry of Education employed 308 staff, according to an Official Information Request. Earlier this week it was announced 202 of those staff were being cut. When you look up “The New Zealand Curriculum” on the Ministry of ...
Chris Bishop’s bill has stirred up a hornets nest of opposition. Photo: Lynn Grieveson for The KākāTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate from the last day included:A crescendo of opposition to the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill is ...
Monday left me brokenTuesday, I was through with hopingWednesday, my empty arms were openThursday, waiting for love, waiting for loveThe end of another week that left many of us asking WTF? What on earth has NZ gotten itself into and how on earth could people have voluntarily signed up for ...
Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.State of humanity, 20242024, it feels, keeps presenting us with ever more challenges, ever more dismay.Do you give up yet? It seems to ask.No? How about this? Or this?How about this?Full story Share ...
Determining the hardest sport in the world is a subjective matter, as the difficulty level can vary depending on individual abilities, physical attributes, and experience. However, based on various factors including physical demands, technical skills, mental fortitude, and overall accomplishment, here is an exploration of some of the most challenging ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
The National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...
A significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...
New Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...
Today’s advice from the Climate Change Commission paints a sobering reality of the challenge we face in combating climate change, especially in light of recent Government policy announcements. ...
Minister for Disability Issues Penny Simmonds appears to have delayed a report back to Cabinet on the progress New Zealand is making against international obligations for disabled New Zealanders. ...
The Government’s newly announced review of methane emissions reduction targets hints at its desire to delay Aotearoa New Zealand’s urgent transition to a climate safe future, the Green Party said. ...
Distinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...
The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...
The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...
A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
Refreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...
Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson is speaking at the International Wool Textile Organisation Congress in Adelaide, promoting New Zealand wool, and outlining the coalition Government’s support for the revitalisation the sector. "New Zealand’s wool exports reached $400 million in the year to 30 June 2023, and the coalition Government ...
The Government is making legislative changes to make it easier for new early learning services to be established, and for existing services to operate, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. The changes involve repealing the network approval provisions that apply when someone wants to establish a new early learning service, ...
Asia Pacific Report Chief Mandla Mandela, a member of the National Assembly of South Africa and Nelson Mandela’s grandson, has joined the Freedom Flotilla in istanbul as the ships prepare to sail for Gaza, reports Kia Ora Gaza. Mandela is also the ambassador for the Global Campaign to Return to ...
Pacific Media Watch Journalists who report on environmental issues are encountering growing difficulties in many parts of the world, reports Reporters Without Borders. According to the tally kept by RSF, 200 journalists have been subjected to threats and physical violence, including murder, in the past 10 years because they were ...
Analysis by Dr Bryce Edwards, Democracy Project (https://democracyproject.nz)Political scientist, Dr Bryce Edwards. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has surprised everyone with his ruthlessness in sacking two of his ministers from their crucial portfolios. Removing ministers for poor performance after only five months in the job just doesn’t normally happen in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra BagzhanSadvakassov/Upsplash, CC BY-SA Australia’s inflation rate has fallen for the fifth successive quarter, and it’s now less than half of what it was back in late 2022. ...
ACT's Rural Communities and Veterans spokesman Mark Cameron responds to cancellations and protests of ANZAC Day commemorations in Wellington. He says, "These pitiful attempts to detract from ANZAC Day are not at all indicative of the feelings of mainstream ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Meighen McCrae, Associate Professor of Strategic & Defence Studies, Australian National University American and Australian stretcher bearers working together near the front line during the Battle of Hamel in 1918.Australian War Memorial While the AUKUS alliance is new, the Australian-American partnership ...
Pōneke based peace activists staged a silent protest at the ANZAC day service to highlight New Zealand’s complicity in war and genocide, and urge the government to take concrete steps to stop the genocide in Palestine. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Magdalena M.E. Bunbury, Postdoctoral Researcher, James Cook University Burial with a horse at the Rákóczifalva site, Hungary (8th century AD).Sándor Hegedűs, Hungarian National Museum, CC BY How do we understand past societies? For centuries, our main sources of information have been ...
Amanda Thompson doesn’t really do Anzac Day. But what she does do is remember the people she knew who had a lifetime to remember stuff they didn’t really want to, because of a war they didn’t ask for. And she does make Anzac biscuits.First published in 2021.All my ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kathryn Willis, Postdoctoral Researcher, CSIRO Xavier Boulenger/Shutterstock In the two decades to 2019, global plastic production doubled. By 2040, plastic manufacturing and processing could consume as much as 20% of global oil production and use up 15% of the annual carbon ...
With our collective remembrance, and steadfast belief in our common humanity, we strengthen our hope and resolve to do what we can to foster dialogue and understanding, and to heal divisions in our pursuit of peace. ...
Principal reasons for the opposition is the loss of the public’s democratic right to have “a fair say” and the vital need for a government free from corruption, said Casey Cravens of Dunedin, president of the New Zealand Federation of Freshwater ...
Never mind the scoreboard – in the 2000 Bledisloe Cup decider, the real trans-Tasman battle was won before kickoff.First published in 2016. The dawn of the new millennium was a dark time for the All Blacks. Their final game pre-Y2K was a 22-18 loss to South Africa in the ...
I’m on the wrong side of 40, I never pursued creative work and now my job is killing my soul. Help! Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nzDear Hera,May I start with the least original conversation opener you’re likely to hear around the motu at the moment, particularly in Wellington: ...
“Never again - No AUKUS” was the message of the wreath laid at this morning’s national ANZAC Day commemorative service at Pukeahu National War Memorial Park this morning by the Stop AUKUS group. ...
Until this month, Auckland swimmer Hazel Ouwehand had never met a qualifying time in an Olympic event for a New Zealand team, even as a junior. Now she’s very likely off to the Paris Olympics after swimming well under the qualifying standard in the 100m butterfly twice – both in ...
While Anzac Day has experienced a resurgence in recent years, our other day of remembrance has slowly faded from view.The Sunday Essay is made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand. Original illustrations by Hope McConnell.First published in 2022.The high school’s head girl and ...
Australian and New Zealand volunteers fought together in the Waikato War, yet still its place in the Anzac tradition is unacknowledged by our defence forces or Returned Services Association.First published in 2018.When I was a boy cub I attended Anzac Day services in the South Auckland suburb of ...
A poem by Wellington writer Tayi Tibble.Hoki Mai She kisses him goodbye with her eyes still wet and alight from their last swim in the Awatere river. At the train station celebration, she leads the Kapa Haka but her voice keeps breaking under and over itself like waves. ...
A poem from Bill Manhire’s 2017 book of verse Some Things to Place in a Coffin.My World War I Poem Inside each trench, the sound of prayer. Inside each prayer, the sound of digging. Image courtesy of Auckland War Memorial Museum. ...
There are three books I have wolfed down in one sitting over the last two years. Colleen Maria Lenihan’s gorgeous and sad debut Kōhine, Noelle McCarthy’s memoir Grand about becoming her mother and then unbecoming her, and now Hine Toa, a staunch yet gentle self-portrait by living legend Ngāhuia te ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Thursday 25 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Asia Pacific Report Students and activist staff at Australia’s University of Sydney (USyd) have set up a Gaza solidarity encampment in support of Palestinians and similar student-led protests in the United States. The camp was pitched as mass graves, crippled hospitals, thousands of civilian deaths and the near-total destruction of ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James B. Dorey, Lecturer in Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong Australian teddy bear bees are cute and fluffy, but get a look at that massive (unbarbed) stinger! James Dorey Photography Most of us have been stung by a bee and we ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jen Roberts, Senior Lecturer, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong Aussie~mobs/FlickrVictor Farr, a private in the 1st Infantry Battalion, was among the first to land at Anzac Cove just before dawn on April 25 1915. Victor Farr ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne Gregory Moore I had the good fortune to care for the sugar gum at The University of Melbourne’s Burnley Gardens in Victoria where I worked for ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra BagzhanSadvakassov/Upsplash, CC BY-SA Australia’s inflation rate has fallen for the fifth successive quarter, and it’s now less than half of what it was back in late 2022. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rachel Ong ViforJ, ARC Future Fellow & Professor of Economics, Curtin University Just when we think the price of rentals could not get any worse, this week’s Rental Affordability Snapshot by Anglicare has revealed low-income Australians are facing a housing crisis like ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Meighen McCrae, Associate Professor of Strategic & Defence Studies, Australian National University American and Australian stretcher bearers working together near the front line during the Battle of Hamel in 1918.Australian War Memorial While the AUKUS alliance is new, the Australian-American partnership ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tracey Holmes, Professorial Fellow in Sport, University of Canberra When the news broke last weekend that 23 Chinese swimmers had tested positive to a banned drug in early 2021 and were allowed to compete at the Tokyo Olympic Games six months later ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Cally Jetta, Senior Lecturer and Academic Lead; College for First Nations, University of Southern Queensland Australian War MemorialAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised this article contains names and images of deceased people, as well as sensitive historical information ...
RNZ News Melissa Lee has been ousted from New Zealand’s coalition cabinet and stripped of the Media portfolio, and Penny Simmonds has lost the Disability Issues portfolio in a reshuffle. Climate Change and Revenue Minister Simon Watts will take Lee’s spot in cabinet. Simmonds was a minister outside of cabinet. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Lindenmayer, Professor, Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University laurello/Shutterstock Some reports and popular books, such as Bill Gammage’s Biggest Estate on Earth, have argued that extensive areas of Australia’s forests were kept open through frequent burning by ...
Analysis - Christopher Luxon framing the demotion of two ministers as the portfolios getting "too complex" is a charitable way of saying they weren't up to the job. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra With Jim Chalmers’s third budget on May 14, Australians will be looking for some more cost-of-living relief – beyond the tax cuts – although they have been warned extra measures will be modest. As ...
Analysis: Melissa Lee has lost the media portfolio and her spot in Cabinet after multiple failed attempts to find solutions for a media industry in crisis. On Wednesday, the Prime Minister announced Lee would be losing her spot in Cabinet along with her media and communications ministerial portfolio. The job ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Simon Wilmot, Senior Lecturer, Film, Deakin University Among the many Australian who served during the second world war, there is a small group of people whose stories remain largely untold. These are the Muslim men and women who, while small in number, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kelly Saunders, PhD Candidate, University of Canberra There has been much analysis and praise of Justice Michael Lee’s recent judgement in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case against Channel Ten. Many people were openly relieved to read Lee’s “forensic” and “nuanced” application of law ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kathy Gibbs, Program Director for the Bachelor of Education, Griffith University zEdward_Indy/Shutterstock Around one in 20 people has attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It’s one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood and often continues into adulthood. ADHD is diagnosed ...
The Fairer Future coalition of anti-poverty groups say Whaikaha must be properly funded going forward, and that to argue that poor financial management of the new Ministry is a red herring by the Prime Minister. ...
The Taxpayers’ Union is today congratulating Hon. Paul Goldsmith on his appointment as Minister for Media and Communications and urges him to rule out state intervention in the private media sector. ...
Asia Pacific Report The West Papuan resistance OPM leader has condemned Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Joe Biden, accusing their countries of “six decades of treachery” over Papuan independence. The open letter was released today by OPM chairman Jeffrey P Bomanak on the eve of ANZAC Day ...
Welcome to The Spinoff Books Confessional, in which we get to know the reading habits and quirks of New Zealanders at large. This week: writer and one of Time Magazine’s 100 most influential people of 2024, Lauren Groff.The book I wish I’d writtenIf I wish I’d written a ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Fechner, Research Fellow, Social Marketing, Griffith University mavo/Shutterstock Imagine having dinner at a restaurant. The menu offers plant-based meat alternatives made mostly from vegetables, mushrooms, legumes and wheat that mimic meat in taste, texture and smell. Despite being given that ...
“Three Strikes is a dead-end policy proposed by a dead-end government. The Three Strikes law ignores the causes of crime, instead just brutalising people already crushed by the cost of living.” ...
By Don Wiseman, RNZ Pacific senior journalist An Australian-born judge in Kiribati could well face deportation later this week after a tribunal ruling that he should be removed from his post. The tribunal’s report has just been tabled in the Kiribati Parliament and is due to be debated by MPs ...
With its clear mandate for police use, political nuances, and nuanced public trust, Denmark's insights provide valuable considerations for Australia and New Zealand. ...
Books editor Claire Mabey reviews poet Louise Wallace’s debut novel. A famous poet once said to me that he’s always suspicious when a poet publishes a novel. I never really understood why but maybe it’s something to do with cheating on your first form. Louise Wallace is a poet. She’s ...
For a few months at the turn of the millennium, TrueBliss burned bright as the biggest pop stars in the country. Alex Casey chats to two superfans who still hold the flame. During a humble backyard wedding in Nelson, 1999, one of the cordially invited guests had to excuse themselves ...
How will the recent wave of job cuts impact ethnic diversity in the media? In November last year, I was working a very busy day in the newsroom of a large online news site, interviewing whānau about their concerns over the imminent closure of one of the few puna reo ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ruth Knight, Researcher, Queensland University of Technology Have you ever felt sick at work? Perhaps you had food poisoning or the flu. Your belly hurt, or you felt tired, making it hard to concentrate and be productive. How likely would you be ...
Despite heavy criticism and an ongoing select committee process, the Police Minister says the Government will forge ahead with a ban on gang patches. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sam Whiting, Lecturer – Creative Industries, University of South Australia Shutterstock Everyone has a favourite band, or a favourite composer, or a favourite song. There is some music which speaks to you, deeply; and other music which might be the current ...
A new survey says ‘outlook not great’ for those charged with building infrastructure, while RMA changes delight farmers and depress environmentalists, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. First RMA changes announced ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Olli Hellmann, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Waikato Getty Images When New Zealanders commemorate Anzac Day on April 25, it’s not only to honour the soldiers who lost their lives in World War I and subsequent conflicts, but also ...
A leaked document shows the Canterbury/Waitaha arm of health agency Te Whatu Ora is scurrying to save $13.3 million by July. The “financial sustainability target”, which was “allocated” to Waitaha, is consistent with what’s happening in other districts, says Sarah Dalton, executive director of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists. ...
Yeah right
In response to Jono Hutchinson reporting on a comment on mine on this site, Lynn Prentice with the help of others has engaged in a character assassination of myself.
This character assassination probably springs from Lynn’s insecurity that left commentary departing from the Labour Green political script will be picked up by the media.
As part of this character assassination Lynn Prentice has let Qot a poster on this site make comments slandering me as a inveterate liar. Fair enough I suppose. But if I try and defend myself by asking her and others who attack my integrity to provide just one example to back up their accusations. Lynn censors my comment.
It seems that on this site you have the right to be attacked but no right to defend yourself.
This character assassination launched on me is obviously building up to justify a complete ban to prevent me making comments during the run up to the elections next year.
Lynn Prentice himself has called me delusional and accused me of lying. He has also accused me of twisting his words. It is not my fault that he has changed his testimony since I first commented on them.
As it looks likely that I will be banned from commenting on this site during the elections. I have decided to put up the debate here. And let the readers decide whether it is justified, or not.
Jenny
30 July 2013 at 4:11 am
Lynn. Whether or not it can be proved that Shearer shouted out “We will be having a review”. I know what I heard. (And saw) Your supporters are not even saying that I am mistaken. You let them call me a liar, letting them attack my integrity at will. When I challenge them to show just one example of this, which you know they can’t, you blank it out. In this you are colluding with those who are trying to paint me as a liar. These are the actions of a bully.
I know that you are hostile to my attempt to make climate change an election issue, which by all accounts indicate it will not be. To this end you are trying to use a minor dispute to attack my integrity and ultimately to shut me out, so that you can happily have your election coverage and debate in peace, free to ignore climate change. Don’t deny it you have already expressed this view. It is, “Politics 101″. not to expend political capital on this one issue, you said.
I can see the writing on the wall. Go ahead disgrace yourself.
In my opinion we should be expending every form of capital we have to defeat this menace.
In this ongoing debate between you and me, it doesn’t surprise me that you take David Shearer’s side against David Cunliffe. In my opinion David Cunliffe is the only parliamentarian who has taken climate change seriously.
I thought Cunliffe’s contribution was dignified and sincere while Shearer’s was churlish and uncalled for. You disagree. I suppose we all make our own bed and have to lie in it. Live then, with an administration that will permit the continuation of climate change and the collection of metadata against its citizens, you will have done your part to bring it about.
Jenny
28 July 2013 at 10:06 pm
That’s the crux of the matter TRP. If Shearer was saying exactly what Cunliffe was saying why did he need to so rudely interject it?
And by the way, there were a number of other people who have confirmed they heard David Shearer say “We will be having a review”. Notice the full stop. This was after Cunliffe said our leader has promised a review and “this law must not, will not and can not stand”. Shearer’s unmissable message is “WE WILL BE HAVING A REVIEW’ full stop. And no, heartfelt “this bill cannot stand” nonsense will be tolerated.
It looks to me that we are in line for another tragic sell out.
Oops! I missed the date stamp on Lynn’s comment showing that it was made after I had addressed the question he accuses me of avoiding.
It is cross over. Takes time to write comments and read other comments. I had the same irritation about telling you repeatably to read the update at the end of my post
🙄
Come and see the violence inherent in the system! I’m being repressed!
Popcorn for breakfast!
The major nuisances imo on The Standard open mike (which users are fortunate to have going by many other blogs) for me are ranked thus:
• over long pieces
• boring others who use some of their valuable time visiting and contributing here
• being at variance with any recognisable version of political reality
• posting the same crappola once too often
So I end up automatically skating over about a dozen regulars but stopping and reading every word from about the same number who write pithy relevant comments.
+1
Tiger Mountain
You could be criticising me I think. So my defence for longer items –
. over long pieces – I will often copy some of a longer piece that makes good points that are relevant, and then I put the links so others can read the rest for themselves, if…
. boring – they don’t think the subject is boring. And not everything can be absorbed on any given day but is still important to others.
. being at variance…with political reality – What is it? Can reality be
definitely established? And could I and others survive the actuality which might
be entirely lacking in hope for something better. Endless chewing of cuds of trivia though just becomes boring when it seems to be fantasy fiction. One hopes of course that it is.
. posting the same crappola once too often.
My thing is that it would be a better world if we applied more carrot and less stick, more
community kindness and less rule-driven judgementalism, more care for parents and help for them so there were less distressing results of wrong doing, and concentrating on happy families working together etc etc I get repetitive about this. But seeing it seems obvious to me and is not a new idea but continues to be resisted by policy makers and policy followers, I think it does need holding up continuously as a worthwhile and achievable goal.
And I don’t think short sharp comments show much thinking. They are more just acknowledgments and reactions from people who know about the matter. Sometimes a mere agreement with a well-written comment, or a pithy, funny, clever, heartfelt or whatever one is good.
But to inform on a thought at least a few words are needed, a bit of explanation to fill out the opinion etc. People who know what they are talking about or trying to present the matter in a new way make the thread interesting. I choose my favourites but also look at the thought lines of others, and soon find those who I consider haven’t got joined up synapses and skip them. And the ones that are obviously RWNJ spoilers I enjoy applying some well-rounded phrases as they usually seem no more than naughty children throwing stones to annoy while at the same time being prepared to impact and hurt.
+1 Rosetinted….and I am being supportive of you
Boring is in the mind of the interpreter …what bores one will not bore another …and divergence is good ….so bring on all those boring old farts and right wingers and vulgarians and lets have some fun! ( too many smart people can be mind numbing)
Also I like Jenny and what she has to say ….so keep going Jenny ….keep fighting for Cunliffe ….and whatever happened to Xstasy ?
Thanks Chooky
I know I do a few long ones but not all about the same thing though. Jenny is very focussed and long. I have to skip – I haven’t the time. Diversity is good, but focus is important and Jenny’s can be excellent but I like detective stories for a long read.
Reply Rosetinted
I like obsessive compulsives myself…and Climate Change is important to be harped on about ( that said I would also be interested in those HAARP conspiracy stories my American friend used to go on and on about until she went off the internet…ha ha) ….Labour Leadership cant be let go of either ….someone has to keep at it like a Rotweiller with a bone!….WATCH DOGS are the answer. I am rather partial to conspiracy theories and Sci fi myself for a longer read.
Now, now CV, better watch what you say or you will be next 🙂
Already thought I was 😉
No, I was asking you to put up evidence, a timeline, anything to examine your claims. After all there were a pile of mics, cameras, and people at that meeting – surely you’d be able to find some kind of support. Something that was so clearly lacking when you made the assertion in the first place and that fool Hutchison wrapped a story around it.
When you did I looked at it with the results I reported. I see you haven’t dealt with that at all in this comment. Have you even listened to that video’s audio track? Or did gathering evidence get lost in your obsessional drive to put your own spin and unsupported assertions on events.
Basically I think that your assertions about what Shearer said are outright fantasy
More rope?
and a nice big martyr sign.
Jenny, out of mole hills mountains are made, your claims about what Dave,(the incumbent),said or didn’t say to the other Dave,(not the incumbent), and in what manner he said it, including that Dave(the incumbent) was trying to Bully Dave(not the incumbent) have become in terms of what has occurred since farcical,
Having read parts of this ‘debate’ what i have so far ascertained is that you will not answer even the most simple of questions, ‘were you in the hall when the interjection by Dave(the incumbent) was made and if so where in the hall were you’,
Your assertion made here this morning that LPrent is attacking you for sinister reasons, that being ‘your’ attempt to make Climate Change an election issue, have i missed something, can you add a little proof to such an assertion like in what Post and on which days such an attempt has been made,
i can assure you that Climate change is and will be an election issue, do you know why, the Green Party will be standing in that election, full stop,
You don’t seem to accept the criticisms leveled at you, no big thing i certainly struggle to do the same, however this morning’s calling for martyrdom of yourself takes the farce to new heights,
Take a deep one jenny, let it go…
Fight the real enemies.
Yeah exactly, the amount of vitriol and invective leveled at Dave(the incumbent), would scorch what remains of the natural hair off of the head of the Slippery little Shyster we have as Prime Minister if leveled at Him,(leaving Him with only a large patch of soft hairs gathered from the anal crevice of a blind donkey called Brucie)…
You do realise that John Key already wears a toupée? All that fretting about who he ripped of as an investment banker I guess. Didn’t realise they made toupées from the “soft hairs gathered from the anal crevice of a blind donkey” though.
Well said. bad12. Her refusal to state whether she was actually there and if so, where in the hall totally undermined her credibility in my eyes.
But re your request that she identify her posts on climate change, Jenny has put up many comments seeking to make climate change the only issue (usually the first post on Open Mike). In many of these posts, Jenny has at the same time claimed that the Greens have sold out on climate change and attacked them for this supposed sell-out. I gave up reading any of Jenny’s comments on this issue long ago.
Yeah i have read a number of these comments from jenny and commented on the odd occasion about Her little obsession,
Read paragraph 2 of Her little effort today and there is a direct accusation that LPrent is attacking Jenny over the ‘Dave interjection’ because LPrent does not like what Jenny has previously commented on about ‘climate change/election issue’, blah blah and on She goes,
Such Machiavellian Bull-s**t simply does my head in where the is no proof offered to back up such an assertion,
i have no reason what-so-ever to be a Dave(the incumbent) supporter, in fact after the ‘sickness bene on the roof speech’ exactly the opposite, but, give the bloke a ‘fair go’, the training wheels will definitely come off if Labour decide to keep Him as leader and He becomes the Prime Minister but it wont be ummmm aaah that he will be roasted over should this occur…
Et tu Brute????!
Just kidding mate
Your assertion made here this morning that LPrent is attacking you for sinister reasons, that being ‘your’ attempt to make Climate Change an election issue, have i missed something, can you add a little proof to such an assertion like in what Post and on which days such an attempt has been made,
That would be the same LPrent who has written and commented extensively on AGW in these very pages, both promoting good science and knowledge of the realities of AGW and combating CC deniers and idiots.
LOLZ weka, it’s probably time to resort to the rolly eyes icon, Jenny seems to formulate Her comments in the same vein as the wing-nuts do except from a left perspective,
i have a giggle reading some of them and occasionally comment to Her but like a lot of others tend to go yawn and keep scrolling when it’s the same thing over and over…
I find all this stuff symptomatic of trying to paint Shearer in a good light.
The guy is not only a total failure as a leader, he also represents the right wing of Labour.
The substantial difference between the two statements on Thurs night is clear go me.
The future leader Cunliffe made a statement that opposed the Bill outright, taking an implicit repeal position (Must not, cannot and will not stand) not dependent on the review.
Shearer understood this challenge and rejected it shouting out ‘we will do a review’.
“Shearer understood this challenge and rejected it shouting out ‘we will do a review’.”
Yeah, nah. Cunliffe said there would be a review, Shearer (allegedly) said there would be a review. That’s it, no contradiction between them at all. Unless, of course, you have the evidence Jenny has failed to provide …
No, of course you don’t have evidence. There were hundreds of people in the hall, a host of big and little cameras and not a single recording of Shearer contradicting Cunliffe. Because it didn’t happen.
I also attended the meeting, and because I was standing on the left hand side and out of view of the stage, spent most of my time watching the crowd.
Posted on the David dynamic on the Daily Blog the next day. Would’ve refrained if I knew what a dissection the interaction would have resulted in.
From my perspective – at the hall – and with full view of all three Davids:
David Cunliffe did not know that David Shearer had arrived, and stood up to speak because the mike and attention were directed to him, as he had been there since the beginning front and centre. He did not appear to be aware of Shearer during his answer, because Shearer was out of direct sightline, and Cunliffe was skillfully addressing the crowd and not the questioner alone.
David Shearer made tentative but silent moves to answer the question, but as usual in a meeting – since attention was already directed to the front – had little chance of being noticed. When a review was mentioned (and I too thought it was Shearer) – the tone seemed supportive rather than corrective or aggressive, but since I don’t know Shearer’s personality and communication skills intimately – my take is completely personal. In the appreciation following Cunliffe’s “it will not stand!” most people missed it – and also – missed the opportunity to notice Shearer and ask for further clarification.
The interaction, while interesting, was typical of what happens during any informal meeting, and happened in the space of a couple of minutes.
Thanks Molly.
red rattler, AND, the next day clarified that interjection by stating that there will be a full review and we will change the legislation based upon that review,
Mountains out of molehills…
bad12
Well said bad12. Despite the mainstream media ignoring anything to do with anthropogenic climate change (that means it’s man made), there has been some recent serious developments that should mean climate change is once again on the agenda.
As much as these current events about who’s the biggest liar in parliament are entertaining, not much of that performance is going to compare when the effects of climate change start costing us the entire worlds GDP.
In that case, politics will truly become the entertainment branch of industry, and the politicians “performance” will be all too horribly inadequate.
+1
Reader Poll on Stuff.
Support the Party’s housing policy.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/
48% think it’s a really good idea
24% playing the race card
Another of National’s mouthpieces the Herald is also worried about Labour’s new policy on housing and doing a survey.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/
At 9:46am, 2650-2700 votes.
Support: 60%
No: 34%
I’m not sure: 6%
Pretty good support ratio. And since Labour’s policy is in line with Mana and the Greens a thumbs up for all those parties to continue along this vein.
Given the higher income and asset owning profile of The Herald it seems like Labour has picked the right policy. But they’ve got to get out there and sell it right and sell it hard!
Looks like Granny didn’t like the results of that poll. It’s been replaced with another poll likely to give a more comforting result for their Tory masters..
Whoops, meant Stuff, not Granny Herald.
“Would parties’ policies on home ownership influence you to change your vote?”
Yes
612 votes, 45.1%
No
602 votes, 44.4%
Not sure yet, need to hear more
142 votes, 10.5%
They must be really freaking out now
The rwnjs have asked their editors to run a 3rd poll in a day.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/
TV3 News, your pro govt news channel, according to a commenter on this stuffed article says that TV3 did apologise last night for their bold error on Saturday night’s news where they stated that bottles had been thrown at the Palmy GCSB protest when in fact they hadn’t.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/tv/8977658/GCSB-protesters-lay-TV-complaint
I guess if they get their tip off’s from random emails that contain no photographic evidence and they don’t bother to verify the claim, then they are willing to say anything as long as it is sensational and frames the mighty anti GCSB movement as just another flakey protest.
I missed the news last night, did anyone see the apology? Must have been a sheepish one.
Also on that Saturday bulletin they “misrepresented” the truth in regards to the gates at parliament and access for the protesters With repressed mirth they talked about protesters climbing over the closed gates when there was a gate open nearby. The reality was the immediate entrance was closed and 1000’s had to squeeze through the small side gate.
All this on top of the- you-know -what Jonolism story last week (see Jenny at post #1) it looks like they have a real agenda to pursue.
Just as well John Campbell is there to shine a light
Hi, Rosie, I did see it. Very short and a fair way into the bulletin, unlike the original item. Though, to be fair to them, they were pretty open about the nature of the mistake and promised to do better. So I’m confident there will be no more Jonolism on TV3 till, ahhhh, 6 O’clock tonight.
Thanks TRP. Well, lets see what happens at 6pm then:-) With this nationwide march going on today
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1307/S00373/everyday-kiwisto-march-in-protest-at-12pm.htm
and Anonymous bringing down around 11 National Party websites today, it’s all going off lately. Our voices are getting louder and stronger. Soon the media will have to acknowledge the legitimacy of the grievances of NZ citizens and stop being apologists for the govt………….might be a naive view, but you never know!
The reaction at Labour’s housing policy by the right, only tells me how many people would embrace a full annexation by the Chinese.
That is the thing, generally speaking the Slater/Farrar sewer racism is to loath Polynesians, but worship Chinese. This seems to be because they can only see the the world in terms of fearful, Manichean objectification.
Manichean
Actually, what they worship is wealth and power and it’s obvious that China is becoming very wealthy and powerful.
Plus if it wasant for China, neo-liberalism would have fallen over long ago. Capitalists need that huge pool of slave workers in China.
Every boardroom in the world should have a picture of Deng Xiaopeng up in it. He did more than Reagan, Thatcher, Douglas, Hawke, Keating, Mulroney, Tebbit, Lawson, Lamont, Howe, Douglas, Prebble, Lange, Volker, Clinton, Summers, et al ever did for neo-liberal capitalism.
None of us voted Deng in. We did however vote many of the other pricks in.
The Labour party if in government will implement a policy of banning sales of residential houses to people who live overseas and not in NZ.
John Key says this will be in breach of a number of free trade agreements.
Therefore the free trade agreements restrict the ability of our Parliament to pass what laws it wishes – i.e. they directly affect our sovereignty.
The people of NZ have never agreed to have our Parliament restricted in such a way.
The free trade agreements are therefore invalid.
This has been apparent for some time but always ignored. NZ’s Parliament has no ability to enter into any FTA which attempts to limit our voting rights or sovereignty.
This is a sleeping giant.
Re the FTA agreements
Does that mean nzer can buy and own property in China?
large areas of China are polluted by industrial and agricultural carcinogens. Avoid. Also China is in the middle of a massive unsustainable debt fuelled residential property bubble.
Two reasons Chinese might want to trade in their local property for NZ property.
+1 Colonial Viper
No because their local laws don’t allow for private property even for their own citizens. Just the same as our local laws can be whatever we want. Like we insist on clear titles for instance which is a rarity in most countries.
My understanding of it is..
The FTA says (broadly) that kiwis seeking to do doing business in China are treated no worse than any other investor from any other country and not treated any different to their own citizens. There are various exemptions to that.
That means that it is reasonably hard to lease property in China. But that is largely because it is just hard to find suitable places there. It is usually more of a pain getting stuff past border controls or even figuring out how to deal with the distribution networks. At least that is what people I know doing business there say. They often go through distributors in HK even now.
Similarly we can put largely whatever restrictions we want on purchasing property. However we cannot give other citizens from countries better access than we give the Chinese or the aussies and depending on how the FTA’s are written some other countries..
Foreign buyers are not completely banned, from my reading of the policy, and feel free to correct me if i have got this wrong,
Foreign buyers who are not resident in New Zealand can buy land and build upon it within a year, i assume that they then have a year to sell that property or become resident,
i doubt whether any Government we have an FTA with will object to that, the Labour policy simply attempts to shut out foreign speculators buying existing houses…
Yes and there doesn’t seem to be an explanation around that exception. Why would that exemption be any use? I don’t buy the “adds to the housing stock” argument.
vto, but it would add to the housing stock, IF foreign investors are prepared to buy land and build upon it they are entitled to make an amount of profit from selling that house to a person resident in New Zealand,and pay any tax due i might add,
The whole ban on foreign residents buying existing property isn’t a big deal in my opinion and will probably result in demand shrinking by 2-5%, i see no negative in the policy for New Zealands residents and citizens,
The only small niggle i have is that with the Australians being exempt from the proposal we may find that while British and Asian speculators are driven out of the market that the demand from Australian speculators grows as their dollar value and higher wage rates will then make them the ‘wealthiest buyers’ and having British and Asian buyers with more wealth than them may yet prove to have held that Australian speculation in our housing market in check to a certain extent…
Well yes I suppose it could add to the housing stock…. but it kind of defeats the purpose of the policy as foreigners will simply look to get their bolthole by building new rather than buy existing. Overall the effect could be pretty similar to the current result, pre-policy.
2-5% is a significant chunk in my experience. Vary the demand side by that amount and it will have an effect. But also bear in mind that affordable housing requires a multi-pronged solution – this is one of them prongs.
And I have seen with my own few eyes the very real bidding out of young families by a foreign buyer. And this is the other benefit of such a policy…
… it creates more ownership within the community and that makes a community stronger.
The family that was outbid went back to renting, with its attendant greater transience and weaker strength. Eventually they moved away.
The policy has two very positive features;
1. Drives down capital values. High capital values only benefit banks.
2. Leads to stronger ownership etc within the community as opposed to more transient renters.
It is a no-brainer.
vto, no not from my reading of the proposal, non residents can buy land and build on it but cannot hold either the built on land or bare land for more than a year,
The only bit of that i am unsure of is the total actual time they can hold the land, i am going to assume that they have just the 1 year to build and sell, that’s more positive ‘investment’ than allowing non-residents to buy existing houses and then hold them until the price has risen to a point where they are happy to sell and take the profit for doing nothing…
Yep, the Labour policy doesn’t go anywhere near far enough. It should be an outright ban on foreign ownership of anything in NZ.
“It should be an outright ban on foreign ownership of anything in NZ.”
That really is a brave call. It would be fascinating to try. So you mean literally that New Zealansd would have zero foreign direct investment? That has never been acheived in modern times by any nation. But I guess we could be the first.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_received_FDI
So in 2015 the list of FDI by size might read:
Rank 151 Tajikistan $US million 1,046
Rank 152 New Zealand Nil
Is that what you actually mean?
Yes. We have no need of foreign money to develop our own economy. Thinking that we do is delusional.
That’s not an argument against it no matter what you think.
OK. If you ban all incoming FDI, won’t you need to ban all New Zealand outgoing FDI because otherwise you will run out of capital?
Are you going to ban imports too or is that still OK?
Nope. Two reasons:
1.) The government can create more money.
2.) I expect other countries to do the same.
I didn’t mention trade but generally I’m supportive of it. It needs regulating of course else we end up with society becoming worse off as we’ve seen over the last few decades.
I expect, over time, that trade will minimise.
And you would have this country’s economy 100% owned and controlled by foreign interests, would you not?
If Shearer gets into trouble with this housing policy banning foreigners he should not get defensive, rather he should attack harder. Show some mettle, show some aggression, take a fight directly to Key and make it hostile. Accuse Key of being a racist. Accuse Key of being deceptive and a liar. And don’t back down.
Shearer should have done this with the bad man ban too.
Too scared of the power of the right wing media.
sheesh CV, if that is so then he should be outski. Is Shearer scared of everyone and everything? Is the Labour Party similarly scared like scaredy cats?
I don’t buy that if it is the reason for his slipper-wearing approach to every issue. If the right wing media are hostile then he should still stand up and not back down to them too.
Like Irishbill says on that other post, middle NZ are not stupid. And where they go the media will generally go too.
After all, why is Shearer there? He only has one life like most of us (apparently) so why doesn’t he grab it by the balls? To be or not to be …….. surely
Spark up Shearer, spark up man.
Not scared of their own dissenting MPs and party members
I thought we had a left wing media?
and pissed the bed and thought it was the springs?
What makes you think that?
OK I confess I can’t demonstrate that the MSM is left wing. I take it back.
I am sure that the MSM is stupid, produces mostly rubbish, and is (with a few exceptions) not worth reading. I think because I find it irritating, I have a tendency to assume it is left wing, but I see now that is unfair of me. So I withdraw and apologise.
+1. Your comments are usually worth reading srylands. I may not always agree with them but at least you explain your reasoning well, even when you are taking the piss.
Ah you have just been reading the fools at KiwiBlog and Whaleoil. While some journos may be left leaning, their bosses running the few remaining media companies are most definitely not – they’re mostly interested in money. And generally you make money by sucking up to the lowest possible common denominator.
That lower standard usually equates to talkback, comments on whaleoil, reality TV, paul henry, and seven#. In other words absolutely convinced of their own moral rectitude despite the occasional lapses into fornication, fighting, bigotry, racism, and beating on the missus while absolutely paranoidly certain that everyone else is getting a better deal out of life than they are. And too stupid or lazy to look stuff up.
Seen a mirror lately?
(I do so love it when someone gives me the straight line..)
Can’t have the real poor getting Computers and Internet, they might learn bad stuff about National and vote this time!..
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/budget-2013/8754279/Computer-scheme-funding-halved
I listened to a great episode of the Food Programme (mp3, 13MB 28 mins.) from BBC Radio 4 yesterday, covering food poverty. You can read the programme blurb here.
Food insecurity is a growing issue in the UK, linked with inadequate social welfare, lack of transportation and exacerbated by benefit “reforms”. Similar issues are faced by many New Zealanders as we have seen from the food in schools issue in recent months.
Frustrating time listening to a Mr Wall of an Auckland Real Estate firm attacking Shearer on Morning Report, accusing him of racism, xenophobia and basically not having a clue with the new policy for sales of housing to non-resident foreigners..
Mr Wall talked about NZ being built on immigration when he should have known that the Labour policy cøncerned overseas, non-resident owners. He did not know that similar laws were current in several countries but pronounced on how hard the new law would be to enforce “because in most of the cases he dealt with (20 per year, high end sales) he didn’t even know who the parties in the deal were.” Several times he said that he “didn’t know about that” but still continued to make comments.
How did they ever pick him for his ability to add to our sum general knowledge?
Finally there were two good comments from listeners who heard the same self-serving ignorance both of Labour’s policy and the outside world.
Mr Wall is not above the racism he accuses Shearer of…
http://www.thedenizen.co.nz/wellbeing/on-my-top-shelf-graham-wall/
My God……..I recognise the guy……..one of those mouthy know it all (according only to blatant self-interest and sense of superiority) yuppie pricks. Vanity !!!!
LOL – thanks for the Denizen link. What a dork! He must have been down on real estate sales and desperate for income.
I initially got angry at that RNZ interview – and then decided that if I was looking to buy real estate in Auckland, Wall would immediately go on my “don’t touch with a barge pole” list – as slimy, ignorant and untrustworthy. Talk about how not to sell yourself!
He merely reflects his clientele.
RNZ’s supremely impartial and instructive Mr Wall again……..
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/8981806/Hotchins-mansion-on-brink-of-sale
RNZ’s supremely impartial and instructive Mr Wall again……..
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/8981806/Hotchins-mansion-on-brink-of-sale
RNZ pridefully holds itself as the centre of mature, technically informed expression. That is becoming more of a laugh everyday.
Who the hell in RNZ devised to have a Mr Wall from Wall Real Estate vent his self-interested spleen about policy concerned with foreign non-resident buyers ? Any bets that Mr Wall is a mate or a mate of a mate of someone in RNZ who could jack it up for Mr Wall and his ilk ?
His company deals extensively with the very people the policy is concerned about. Oh no, the policy is all racist shit according to the patently self interested Mr Wall. A policy he’d expect to hear from the racist Invercargill taxi rider he spits, in his mock rounded vowels.
RNZ has allowed Mr Wall to publicise himself as the go-to man when/if such a policy is implemented. It is outrageous that RNZ presents that sort of contribution from the likes of Mr Wall as expert, well-informed, uninterested.
Well done RNZ. Dumbing down is the order of the day.
That one is hardly worth the effort of raising the spittle to direct His way, when asked about the fact that Kiwi’s cannot buy property in China the liquid excrement flowed,
”Oh i don’t know what goes on in China” says He, jesus doesn’t such utter sh*t make you see violent shades of red…
North
Don’t concentrate your spleen on our only public broadcasting service that still is standing after the right-wing earthquake. If there’s something wrong mention it but don’t drop s..t from a great height. Someone in government may be listening and the next thing we know, is that Radionz is being downsized because the public find it unsatisfactory – and it’ll all be your fault! Then we’ll all be sorry. I have the feeling that the gubmint often runs on anecdote when it matches the direction they would like to take.
Listen to some other sites (commercial or student) and let us know how they are. That would be interesting as I don’t do that much. By the time that the good vibes from advertisements for elkhorn nostrums or whatever have been heard a few times it’s goodbye from me.
If I don’t like things on Radionz I’ll probably let them know and why. Why don’t you do the same instead of dissing them so strongly.
A strange response there Rosetinted.
I CANNOT agree that my comment – “RNZ……becoming more of a laugh everyday” (the wheeling in of sham commentators I mean, obviously), nor my suspicions as to how/why Mr Wall was asked to comment/rant in the first place, nor my sardonic thanks to RNZ for the brilliance of its impartial, informative invitees (not)…..amounts to venting my spleen or dropping shit from a great height.
I AM NOT about to take seriously your fear that my comment may activate the dark forces to cancel RNZ.
I AM NOT about to take your direction to listen to “other sites (commercial or student)” and report back to you, firstly because I can’t handle the constant inane guffawing one finds on such “sites”, and secondly because you don’t seem to have expended the effort to do so yourself.
I AM about to ignore the busybody in you. You who misrepresents how I said what I said, and then, just by the way, fails to venture any view on the question.
If then it’s a case of my styles your riles…….tough. Rile away !
Thans for your reply North. A little thought would have made it shorter and sweeter but there you are. It takes all sorts.
Shorter ?………from you ? Hahahahaha.
Styles and riles again methinks. Same answer.
Shorter ?………from you ? Hahahahaha.
Styles and riles again methinks. Same answer.
The deadline for submissions re the consitiutional review is the 31st (tomorrow).
Does anyone know for sure, if that means today is the last day to get one in, or tomorrow is the last day to submit?
Really don’t have much time today (shouldn’t be here….)
Thanks in advance
Hope this helps from http://www.ourconstitution.org.nz/How-to-make-a-Submission
“Send your submission
Please send us your submission by 5pm 31 July 2013.
You can make a submission in a number of ways:
Make a submission online
Fill out the quick submission form and post it to us.
Email a submission to constitutionalreview@justice.govt.nz with “CAP submission” in the subject line. You can attach documents to your email.
Or you can post a submission to:
Submissions
Secretariat, Constitutional Advisory Panel
C/o Ministry of Justice
DX SX10088
Wellington
To make a valid submission you must supply your name. If you are submitting on behalf of an organisation please supply the name of the organisation.
If you have questions about how to make a submission, please call 0508 411 411.”
Cheers VV.
Youre a champion.
I’ve only got a rough outline and I really need to sit down and spend a couple of hours on it.
Time I’ve got tomorrow but not today.
Go well – I am in a good mood today amd knew where to go.
A Herald-poll shows that the majority of respondents support the children of Beneficiaries being included in the Working for Families Tax Credit scheme,
Admittedly only a small poll of 700 but a small ray of light nonetheless,” If beneficiaries want working for tax credits they can get a job”, those words which finally severed any desire for me to either support or vote for Labour,
Just how much denigration can the children of beneficiaries be expected to weather, tax their meager income for spurious reasons, directly cut their meager income for even more spurious reasons, then deny them income from a government redistribution where hand over heart that government dared suggest that the children of families with $60,000 of income were more deserving,
Indulging in the above doesn’t make ‘bad parents’, indulging in the above makes bad parenting a f**king government policy…
WFF should be scrapped and employers should pay people what they’re worth.
OR keep WFF AND make employers pay people what they are worth.
O would go along with that – you just have to recognize that some people are not worth much (professionally) – you have a $1 skill – you can sell it for $1.
Simple.
@ James,
Actually you point out a weakness in Lanthanide’s comment. What one is paid is not a reflection on what they are worth. If this is so, the person looking after, for example, your sick mother in hospital, or someone growing food that you eat, would be considered worth less than a lying and cheating fraudster in the financial system commanding oodles of bonuses whilst undermining the entire functioning of our society.
However, is there anyone working who doesn’t deserve to be paid wages or a salary that covers their living costs?
It appears that rather a lot of employers think this is o.k.
Sure, as long as you recognise that some employers are so shit, workers should be paid bonuses for putting up with their BS.
Fair enough – I agree on that point. My wife works for the Auckland Council and they are terrible – she deserves more for putting up with them (Not that she will get it mind).
But at lease we have been able to agree that some people simply do not have skills that are worth much and are compensated as such.
Not nice – true – but reasonable.
@ James,
So you reckon it is reasonable to have jobs that do not cover the living expenses of the worker?
I don’t.
Hope you don’t expect government welfare costs to go down anytime soon if you think a job needn’t cover living costs.
You can wish all you like but if workers are paid more than their marginal output value the business goes bust.
You must have no experience in running a business. I can tell you that the equaion is simple. Some workers produce more than otehrs but at the margin there will be a worker who is producing marginally more than his/her wages. If wages are regulated upwards beyond that break even point that worker has to go.
How can you not see that?
Probably because once you’ve read more than one or two simplistic libertarian Hayek/Friedman internet raves, it becomes hard to go back to such a trite view of the world.
Something is clearly wrong with the way we do things, working out new ways that have better results will never be solved by continuing to believe that old answers are working.
If a country continues to follow rubbish notions of what can and can’t be done, then, Srylands, they go bust like America, Greece, Britain, Ireland and New Zealand (we are all in massive debt are we not?) or become dependant on power-grabbers who have an obsession with gaining materially and whom have very little concern for the wellbeing of people.
If someone is growing carrots, and the owner can’t afford to pay him or her a living wage, then put the price of the carrots up, Noddy.
No, wait, I have an idea, we can’t put the price of carrots up because we have decided we can’t (or people won’t buy them for that price) so we will just put the workers wages down.
…Oh, what? the worker can’t afford to pay rent and food? I know we will give him handouts. Or better yet we will give him a loan to buy his own house. That way the workers will feel wealthier than they really are and won’t complain!
….Oh what? the worker can’t afford to pay back the debt?
~ Oh I know we will just borrow off other countries to cover up the little problem
…Oh What?? That didn’t work?
~Oh I know, we will bundle the debts up into little packages and sell them as AA investments
…Oh What?? people aren’t repaying their mortgages and the banks have gone bust?
~Oh I know, we will get the workers to pay for the bailout ….
The reason that wages are low is because employers want more profit than is possible. Or perhaps technology has lead us into this place of not-enough-profits-for-neccesities. Or perhaps it is that those with capital prefer to speculate on futures markets (thereby raising the prices falsely). Perhaps we need to change the way we organize ourselves.
The invisible hand can go and fuck itself for a start.
It fails at this point:
“We can’t put the price of carrots up because people won’t buy them for that price.”
Stop growing carrots. Sell house in Levin. Buy vineyard in Martinborough. Make wine. Run cool concerts in summer. Incentivise workers with profit sharing scheme. Everyone is happy.
Import carrots from Tasmania.
All the workers applaud by an invisible hand-clap 🙂
Well I might have agreed with you had you left out the bit about importing the carrots from Tasmania. If people won’t buy the carrots at a decent price and haven’t land to grow them themselves then they can jolly well go without.
I’m unsure what makes you think that the invisible hand has any time for niceties such as applauding…(perhaps the same notion that leads you to believe the invisible hand sorts our organizational problems out for us….)
The srylands market mechanism controls food prices by making people go hungry.
That is what happens in NZ today.
but…but…Colonial Viper…you missed something there…
People go hungry (or into debt) so that some others may experience the freedom to do what they want regardless [of whether they are screwing anyone else]…especially they should be able to make as big a profit as their heart’s desire, and that is what is really important now, isn’t it?
Self interest properly understood would mean that the wealthy elite would not let things get too out of balance. The example of the French Revolution should not be so far from their minds, for instance. The wealthy elite enabled Roosevelt to act during the Depression, making significant concessions to the masses, while essentially saving the system of capitalism.
Unfortunately what we have now amongst the elite is self interest misunderstood.
They’ll bury themselves and us with them over the next 20-30 years.
PS a lot of these “rich” people are going to find themselves very poor in the coming years, as their paper wealth becomes worthless for exchange for real goods and services.
“The srylands market mechanism controls food prices by making people go hungry.”
So why are there so many fat people and most of them are the poor?
@ C.V
Although I understand what you are getting at, and the form of self interest you speak of is certainly healthier than the narrow self interest that has come to be the rule of the day, I really don’t think that a society that believes in an organizing principle of self interest is going to get far.
Societies come together for the benefits that mutual help and cooperation provides. Trying to ignore cooperation and turn the main organizing principle into one of self interest is never going to get far because it goes against the reality of why we clump together in the first place (or more scientifically speaking; that we are a ‘social animal’); i.e. working in groups leads to a better quality of life for the whole tribe; if this wasn’t the case, people wouldn’t bother.
Surely a far more productive organizing principle is to focus on the very qualities that leads to the intended aim–a better quality of life–not those that lead us to pull apart?
@ Srylands,
cos they can’t afford personal trainers, silly.
srylands: you are as ignorant about human nutrition as you are misguided about everything else.
BL: 🙂
In olden times people believed that what was good for their nation was good for themselves. Eg. “For King and Country”. In earlier times they believed in the good of their tribe, their clan, etc.
These days the Left has become so intellectually and rationally clever that there is little remaining for people to believe in.
@CV
lolz (you have to laugh …sometimes…)
Are you sure you’d like that?
See, I’m quite happy for people to be paid what they’re worth but the rich won’t like it because they’d owe the rest of us billions of dollars.
+1 Lol. Brilliant. Cheers for that link.
+1 all it does is artificially subsidize employers much a like the accomodation supplement subsidizes and therefore inflates rent. I’d imagine that if supplements wern’t propping up the rental market an investment property would become a whole lot more unattractive. I’d dare say it would take more heat out of the housing market than investor retsrictions…
Aha, also interest payments can be deducted from PAYE so why wouldn’t the middle class pile into ‘investment housing’ en masse with such subsidies,
Don’t tho expect Labour to change any of that, they are after-all fighting with National for a slice of that middle classes vote and good luck to them,
National wont touch Working for Families either in spite of the Slippery little Shyster when in opposition venting fit to burst a blood vessel that WfW is ‘Communism’…
@Lanthanide
+1
This is the real issue; ensuring people are paid a wage they can live on.
I will add though, that if NZ is going to move into supplementing wages with welfare, as it appears to be doing, then NZers need to be clearly informed and realise the extent of this welfare and drop the whole stigma of receiving welfare.
If governments are going to support landlords and employees by supplementing their requirement to charge higher rents than people can afford and wages that people can’t afford, then governments are going to have to quit the whole anti-welfare memes that they consistently encourage in order to get votes.
If governments persist in ensuring that those on welfare are obligated to feel shame for receiving help, (and as Cricklewood pointed out this help immediately transfers into support for businesses and landlords) then governments need to also ensure that employers and landlords are made to feel obligated to provide wages and ask for rents that are affordable without requiring governments to make up the shortfall.
In my opinion the issue of ‘welfare costs’ needs to be transformed into an issue of ensuring good jobs are available to all. This is the most positive and effective way of clearing up the matter for all NZers.
Attended a free New Economics Foundation workshop – run by Auckland Council (believe it or not), and one of their publications deals with the issue of remuneration vs value.
A Bit Rich (2009) compares the anomaly created in valuing different occupations, and the SROI (Social Return on Investment) and community impact of different types of work.
“We have tested our theory by taking a close look at a sample of highly paid and low paid jobs. We found that some of the most highly paid benefit us least, and some of the lowest-paid benefit us most. Although this will not always hold, it does point to a massive flaw in the system and highlights the need for reform. “
Excerpts:
“….While collecting salaries of between £500,000 and £10 million, leading City bankers to destroy £7 of social value for every pound in value they generate.”
“…. For every £1 they are paid, childcare workers generate between £7 and £9.50 worth of benefits to society.”
Interesting read, and worth the read – even if only to provide interesting debates on these topics.
Thanks for the links Molly,
I agree thoroughly and have been realising lately that the belief that one is worth more when one is paid more is really a problem for social cohesion. I also think it is hard for humans to not believe that they are worth more when paid a lot more than others.
Trouble is, this is a false belief, noone is worth more just because they are paid more. Every human is worth the same, unless perhaps a human who is doing a great deal of good for others, in which case, perhaps they are worth more…to society at least.
As the information you have shared points out most astutely; some of the people providing the most important services are paid the least and some who are destroying our society are being paid the most. Kind of scuppers the idea that a person is worth more depending on the pay they happen to receive.
Agreed. And part of the problem is the “neoliberal” propaganda that private profit-focused businesses contribute more to society than than public sector work. Also undervalued is most of the work that cares for, educates, helps, heals and nurtures people.
@ Karol
Exactly!
I hope we can start to move in a more positive and pragmatic direction than the belief in neoliberal propaganda has been allowing us to.
Attended a free New Economics Foundation workshop – run by Auckland Council (believe it or not), and one of their publications deals with the issue of remuneration vs value.
A Bit Rich (2009) compares the anomaly created in valuing different occupations, and the SROI (Social Return on Investment) and community impact of different types of work.
“We have tested our theory by taking a close look at a sample of highly paid and low paid jobs. We found that some of the most highly paid benefit us least, and some of the lowest-paid benefit us most. Although this will not always hold, it does point to a massive flaw in the system and highlights the need for reform. “
Excerpts:
“….While collecting salaries of between £500,000 and £10 million, leading City bankers to destroy £7 of social value for every pound in value they generate.”
“…. For every £1 they are paid, childcare workers generate between £7 and £9.50 worth of benefits to society.”
Interesting read, and worth the read – even if only to provide interesting debates on these topics.
Wow.
How Serco runs the United Kingdom
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/jul/29/serco-biggest-company-never-heard-of
An excellent Must Read now up on the Herald Online (Opinion) by Gerard McGhie
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=10905042
Two current issues need a great deal more transparency – the GCSB legislation and the Trans- Pacific Partnership negotiations, writes Gerald McGhie.
[ From an earlier Herald articile : “Gerald McGhie is a former career diplomat who served as ambassador to Moscow and Seoul, High Commissioner to Port Moresby and Commissioner in Hong Kong. Now retired, he is a past director of the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs and was chairman of the New Zealand chapter of Transparency International.”
Bomber on “Native Affairs”. Chur Bomber, an excellent spokesperson for the left.(we all have some shortcomings).
+1 RT, got the message across loud and clear without wasting words, UP’s to Bomber it’s nice to know that i aint alone out here…
So – why has ‘Bomber’ banned me from posting comments on his ‘Daily Blog’?
Try asking him and see what he says?
Penny Bright
Penny, i detect from the double post a level of anger, so much so that you have been unable to delete one of them,
Your question is self evident, coz it’s His blog and he can, just as in the final analysis LPrent can give someone a spanking here at the Standard for behavior one day and ignore the same behavior from another the next,
Bomber probably got sick of some of your more Loooooong efforts at posting a comment, i quite often do here on the Standard and simply skim such efforts as i scroll my way down the page…
Question Time today – should be interesting after the two week break and what has happened in that time.
Shearer has his usual – twice (1 and 11) and Peters also has one at Q6. Norman is still on the “Dunne” case(Q2), and Parker is on ‘house price’ duty (Q4). Hipkins is going to give us another’Minister of Education’ moment; and Eugenie Sage is on water safety/quality.
The rest are Nat Patsy questions.
Questions to Ministers
1.DAVID SHEARER to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements?
2.Dr RUSSEL NORMAN to the Prime Minister: Did his Chief of Staff, Wayne Eagleson, advise Parliamentary Service that United Future Leader Hon Peter Dunne had agreed to cooperate with the Henry inquiry and had consented to releasing his electronic phone logs; if so, why?
4.Hon DAVID PARKER to the Minister of Finance: Does he stand by his statement that “High house prices matter because many New Zealanders spend a large portion of their incomes on housing and that has helped fuel household debt and contribute to damaging imbalances in the economy”?
6.Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements?
7.EUGENIE SAGE to the Minister for the Environment: What percentage of sites identified as a river in the Suitability for Swimming indicator report released yesterday were categorised as “Very Good” or “Good” and therefore were safe for swimming?
9.CHRIS HIPKINS to the Minister of Education: Does she agree with the Minister of Finance that “The Government is focusing on ensuring that every teacher put in front of our children is competent”?
11.DAVID SHEARER to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his statements?
?
Pretty hard hitting stuff all round, but especially from Shearer.
Why is it that the Greens, with far less parliamentary experience, almost always seem to do far better in parliament? Are Labour actually trying?
I just despair, MO.
For me, NRT put it quite succinctly in this post http://www.norightturn.blogspot.co.nz/2013/07/oh-ffs.html
By bringing up their housing policy, all Shearer and Parker did is open themselves up to Key etc making disparaging remarks, as nice soundbites for the MSM Fran Mold may be back in the fold, but there was so much more they could have been winning hits on but …………………
I dunno about that. Do you stand by all your statements?
Alan Ray designer of CTV building has taken legal action to stop surveillance of his professional background. Ask the GCSB they’ll know. What a cheek. Its wonderful how these bare-faced scammers as he was, though within the law, can evade taking responsibility.
I remember that he was known for designing buildings so they just achieved building requirements, therefore being efficient no doubt (utilizing a particular commodity or product with the least waste of resources or effort) which is usually judged in NZ as being cheapest.
Joelle Dally wrote an article for stuff in which his name is given as Alan Ray. Other sources spell his name as Alan Reay. Poor journalism on someone’s part.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/christchurch-earthquake/7217699/Engineer-re-lives-inspection-of-CTV-over-and-over
http://www.thecivilian.co.nz/everything-is-fixed-says-key/
ICC says they should open the Cricket World Cup at a ground that doesn’t exist yet and is mired in controversy.
seems lgit
http://rebuildingchristchurch.wordpress.com/2013/07/30/the-icc-bowls-an-underarm-at-the-people-of-christchurch/
Olympic stadiums don’t exist when a city is to host a future olympics either. Yet it all works out in the end.
I’m sure they’ll have deadlines by which time if sufficient progress isn’t made, the match will be moved elsewhere.
“Olympic stadiums don’t exist when a city is to host a future olympics either. Yet it all works out in the end.”
Massive public debt, under used and under maintained facilities, hundreds of millions of tax payer provided corporate subsidies, etc.
Yeah, sure they do but usually the city hasn’t got another ten years or so of recovering from massive earthquake damage to do as well.
We just have to hope that the Black Caps dont get bowled out for -57..
A very engaging NZ expert spoke on Radionz this morning. He is into DNA sequencing and tracing evolution through tests that can be done. Very interesting. Says NZ is very important and that we and the Galpagos Islands are important sites in the world. Though he can’t get funding in NZ and we don’t seem enough about our environmental history and present situation to support needed study. So he’s working in Australia. He says that the kiwi is originally Australian!!
Dna sequencing expert interesting insightful
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon
Tuesday 30/7/13
Feature Guest – Professor Alan Cooper (27′ 54″ )
10:07 Director of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA at the University of
Adelaide. Alan’s a former Wellingtonian who is leading groundbreaking research which uses ancient DNA to record and study evolutionary processes in real time, especially those associated with environmental change.
He says that many clever talented people come from NZ but can’t get work or funding. And I started thinking yes, we came, we saw, we conquered the land and over-ran Maori and have settled into taking what we wanted that we could sell. We are pragmatic, we are ‘practical’, we have ‘common sense’.
We don’t have a real love for our country or each other in society or it would pervade government as well. We are happy if we can get lots of money together, live in a gated community and rumble about the lazy b..s unemployed and the over-fertile women looking to the government to carry their responsibilities.
The country was developed as a land speculation scam where people either came out of desperation from a Britain in recession, enticed here with extravagant promises and unreal scenarios of being in the tropics of the South Pacific, or sold land that hadn’t even been made available by Maori, or if it had, had not been formalised and paid for.
And we were unable to find a working system between landowning farmers, business and unions just as we were reaching a more advanced state of development. Which had largely been achieved through the experience overseas from WW2 and the more sophisticated refugees and new wave of immigrants after the war. Then came defensive reaction to Britain joining the EU and fear that we would be locked out of replacement markets for our primary produce. So we dropped all our protections to show our sincerity and determination to have free borders and dropped the country in a huge cow pat.
Along came neo liberalism, the right wing jumped right in and are prepared to go to jackboot stage as they seek to mould a country to their own personal wishes and interests. Now we have dropped our progressive tax system and brought in high GST that impacts on nearly all financial transactions, and apart from the most wealthy, the middle class are squeezed and the poorer get the toothpaste tube when it is almost flat.
And no hope for better economic management from either major political party which would return us to an enterprising nation having employment for us all which would automatically produce better conditions – that is the final nail in the coffin.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10905495
Andrea Vance’s phone records were given by Datacom to Henry inquiry without request and Henry sent them back !!! carter apologises … question time in the house in 20 mins shd be fun !!
there is a fault in the House system .. no volume being broadcast … not questions time yet as offering congrats to baby george in UK …
Do you know what you are fighting for?
A new age friend of mine (yeah, I know), made the statement recently that the problem with protesting against something is that it is inherently negative and doesn’t say what one actually wants. I generally find these kinds of statements to be idiotic and existing in a vaccum that is disconnected from political reality, but I do take the point that being anti- something without being pro- something can be a problem sometimes (depending on context). On the other hand, sometimes you just have to stand up and say fuck off.
I was thinking about it more today and realised that most activists I know and follow do seem to know what they want as much as what they trying to stop. And the more I think about it the more I am struggling to see protests that have been important to me where we were fighting against something without there being a clear sense of fighting for something as well.
So I thought I would ask. When you are protesting something are you thinking about what you want as much as what you don’t want? Am particularly interested in how activists have seen this over time as specific issues have been addressed and then things have moved on.
Any examples of purely ‘anti’ protests?
I’d also like to know to what extent the whole negative/positive thing gets discussed as strategy in activist circles. Is the whole anti/pro dichotomy a complete nonsense?
Weka, I think it entirely depends on what the situation is, and that there doesn’t necessarily need to be a flip side, what one desires, as an alternative, to what one doesn’t desire. You talk about a dichotomy and as humans I wonder if we often fall into the trap of dichotomous thinking. If you don’t want this then you must want that, kind of thinking.
Why must we justify our objection to something by introducing a nice and positive counter solution to make others feel better about what we do? (I’m thinking of your new age friend here) Sometimes the only thing that needs to be said is “No”. Of course we always need to fully understand why we fight for a certain outcome otherwise it is a meaningless effort.. I’d be surprised that anyone wouldn’t have a full grasp of the holistic value of what they are objecting to as they are marching along and chanting. But then again I have met serial protesters while out a protest. I was speaking with another woman a couple of years ago who said she hadn’t seen me out before. I replied, that I can’t get to everything and like to save my energy for a real and focused fight. We also have differing empathies and allegiances. I wondered if this person was more like a rent-a-crowd stand in, “what ever’s going, I’m in” kind of thing. Maybe this is an example of being purely “anti” without giving much thought to why, and what is beyond. I believe this example is an exception and most folks out protesting have a firmer grasp of their issue than this.
During some protests the “positive” speaks for itself alongside the “negative” and are interwoven. Oppose the GCSB bill?/ (Negative) You want to retain your most basic right to privacy. (Positive) Look at all the placards in the photo’s online. Those two themes appeared equally in the protesters forms of expression.
Can’t speak for strategy discussion in activists group,(in recent years at least) just my observations. As it is I am unavoidably surrounded by folks not of my ilk, right wingers, non voters and the odd new ager and the odd ultra conservative religious person. I find they will always make the same kind of statement as your friend. I agree that they “exist in a vacuum that is disconnected from political reality” . I find these kinds of statements infuriating for many reasons but the main one is that because this ignorance and judgement about protesting means for they are enabling the “enemy” for want of a better word. Inaction of the masses leads to the loss of democracy. So you know what I reckon, keep doing what you do and don’t be sidetracked by those who would make believe you’re “negative and therefore that’s a problem” because you make a stand.
I was anti-tour and pro-equality, I was anti-foreshore and seabed legislation and pro-Māori rights, I am anti-exploitation and pro-environment. I don’t think the anti bit undermines the pro bit, they both co-exist. They have a relationship and are both entwined and you can’t have one without the other. In other words being anti-something is not possible without being pro-something even if at the time we don’t express it as such or aren’t even conscious of it. For me it is part of the fabric of existence and the dichotomies are inherent within the system, and manifested as a human attribute much like the almost automatic ability to catagorise or anthropomorphise what we experience around us.
Anti-anti democracy – and ‘everything’ that flows from anti democratic tendencies in society. And as two negatives make a positive 🙂
Less trite answer? I think if some future vision isn’t borne in mind and modes of organising built around values of that future vision (eg, always pushing more democratic means of organising while resisting authoritarian habits), then protest becomes (sometimes) winning battles against the backdrop of a war that will inevitability be lost.
GOT SOME BIG BITES ON KIWIBLOG OVER THIS POST!!
(Over 21 ‘dislikes’ – so must have jammed a few buttons on full! 🙂
MEDIA ALERT: Auckland Mayoral candidate Penny Bright:
“Will National Party MP Nikki Kaye do the right thing and vote against the GCSB Bill?
“Over 500 signatures have been collected, in Auckland Central, for a petition to National MP for Auckland Central Nikki Kaye, which says:
“The will of the people is the basis of the authority of Government.”
We, the undersigned, call upon YOU, as an MP, to defend the lawful human rights of New Zealanders to privacy, freedom of association and freedom of expression – that is – to oppose arbitrary search and surveillance by the State over citizens.
If YOU, as an MP, vote for this GCSB Bill, which will allow widespread spying on New Zealanders, we hereby PLEDGE to campaign against your re-election in 2014, and to encourage our families, neighbours and workmates to do the same. ”
“These petitions are now with the overnight courier, destined for Parliament, and should arrive in time for the National caucus meeting, which, as I understand it, should be meeting at 10am, Tuesday 30 July 2013.”
“If there is ONE thing that politicians understand – it is VOTES!
My very strong recommendation is that as many people as possible, email all National MPs, Peter Dunne (now ‘Independent’), and the DEFENDANT – ACT Party Leader and MP for Epsom, John Banks, who supported the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill, at it’s first reading, and urge them NOT to support this Bill, ” says Auckland Mayoral candidate Penny Bright.
WHO VOTED FOR THE BILL AT IT’S FIRST READING:
http://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/pb/debates/debates/50HansD_20130508_00000024/government-communications-security-bureau-and-related-legislation
A party vote was called for on the question, That the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill be reported back to the House by 26 July 2013, and that the Intelligence and Security Committee have authority to meet at any time while the House is sitting (except during oral questions), during an evening on a day on which there has been a sitting of the House, and on a Friday in a week in which there has been a sitting of the House, despite Standing Orders 188 and 191(1)(b) and (c).
Ayes 61 New Zealand National 59; ACT New Zealand 1; United Future 1.
Noes 57 New Zealand Labour 33; Green Party 13; New Zealand First 7; Maori Party 3; Independent: Horan.
Motion agreed to.
____________________________________________________________
CONTACT DETAILS for current NZ MPs:
http://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/mpp/mps/current/
_____________________________________________________
THE MESSAGE MPS CANNOT IGNORE:
“The will of the people is the basis of the authority of Government.”
I call upon YOU, as an MP, to defend the lawful human rights of New Zealanders to privacy, freedom of association and freedom of expression – that is – to oppose arbitrary search and surveillance by the State over citizens.
If YOU, as an MP, vote for this GCSB Bill, which will allow widespread spying on New Zealanders, I hereby PLEDGE to campaign against your re-election in 2014, and to encourage my family, neighbours and workmates to do the same. ”
http://www.occupyaucklandvsaucklandcouncilappeal.org.nz
Penny Bright
‘Anti-corruption / anti-privatisation’ campaigner
2013 Auckland Mayoral candidate
+1
An important documentary by Selwyn Manning, to be aired on Face (Sky & analogue TV) on Monday night (5 Aug 8pm)
It is the result of investigations about the Ahmed Zaoui case, and the background we have never been told. It apparently raises significant questions about our intelligence services:
The frequency of the double saved comments is increasing damnit. I actually have a fix for it (full MD5 to replace the existing check, increased size of the recent comment queue, an increased timeout, and flushing to auto-mod if it times out).
BUT I coded it into a plugin designed for wordpress 3.6 – which last time I looked had just made it to RC2….. Ummm. wait I think..
BTW: If anyone is interested. The timeline of revisions is really intense at present. But they’re starting to close more tickets.
http://wordpress.org/news/2013/07/wordpress-3-6-release-candidate-2/
Oops. The momentary outage was my doing a apt-get upgrade rather than a apt-get update….. php upgrade meant the site was off for a minute.
I thought you’d been cyber-bombed by the key gestapo
Ok stopped fiddling. Showing a 12% increase in performance overall.
But I’m getting not enough on the post with 700 comments damnit..
Can’t find any comment on it above……………Geoffrey Palmer on Campbell Live. A powerful statement. Had “Churchillian” flashing across my head a coupla times. Which surprised me.
So, so significant. He gave a clear, stern admonishment to New Zealand that democracy and our rights are under threat.
Let’s see the ShonKey Python response – the level of response will say SO much.
In a Vaudeville moment I see ShonKeyPython giving Jamie-Lee Ross his next gig ???
Yes. I watched Palmer on Campbell Live. He was very good. Very clear. Good journos everywhere would’ve been nodding their heads in agreement. So would most of the viewers I expect.
Despite his impressive calibre, he just wasn’t the right fit as a Labour Leader though 😉
His awkward dancing at a Pacific Islands forum did him in. Times have changed. John Key’s awkward dancing just seems to generate smiles, and even his planking probably increased his poll support. 🙂
These things are clearly important to voters.
Anyone out there remember Equiticorp?
Some of us have worthless share certificates to remind us.
It begs the question how this individual has been allowed to get near the finance markets since…
Allan Hawkins was apparently sentenced for six (6) years for 7 charges of fraud and conspiracy in 1993.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10905449
Or is this just par for the course behaviour of our captains of industry?
OK, I suppose fraud can be considered an “industry” nowadays.
That’s an example of what I complained of a day or so ago – (I was referring then to ShonKey Python and the MSM, especially television) – they’re fucking around with the nation’s psyche, our democracy, our values.
Sadly that sort of stuff is business as usual in the public sense now. Our morals have been deadened.
That would be par for the course.
Of course, he supposed to have paid his debt to society and turned over a new leaf.
Clearly Hawkins needs to be denied access to any more leaves. I never thought we’d hear from him again in the business world.