web analytics

Open mike 31/05/2025

Written By: - Date published: 6:00 am, May 31st, 2025 - 23 comments
Categories: open mike - Tags:


Open mike is your post.

For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Step up to the mike …

23 comments on “Open mike 31/05/2025 ”

  1. Todays Posts 1

    Today's Posts (updated through the day):

  2. dv 2

    https://www.thepress.co.nz/nz-news/360690188/mining-company-granted-exploration-permit-marlboroughs-endeavour-inlet

    Sams Creek Gold Limited, owned by Siren Gold, sought the five-year permit for an operation named Queen Charlotte, to explore the potential for mining in an area from Endeavour Inlet and Resolution Bay north to Port Gore and Titirangi Farm Park, and includes a section of the renowned Te Araroa Trail.

    GEEZ

  3. Drowsy M. Kram 3

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deputy_Prime_Minister_of_New_Zealand

    It is the dawning of the age of Aquarius David Seymour – Seymour is a Cancer.

    What is the regulatory standards bill?

    David Seymour’s Regulatory Standards Bill is a dangerous attack on nature and Te Tiriti. It attempts to lock ACT’s far-right principles into law, making sure that corporate property and profits trump the public good, environmental protection and our founding document.

    https://www.greenpeace.org/aotearoa/story/submission-guide-regulatory-standards-bill/

    https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-29-05-2025/#comment-2035031

    https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-29-05-2025/#comment-2035048

  4. Reality 4

    Given Winston Peters sensitivity at an onlooker shouting at him at Wellington railway station, and Peters reaction, which got some support for Peters in the media, it will be interesting how the media responds to Chris Bishop's ignorant, rude, loudmouth behaviour at the music awards. Why do so many right wing politicians have such a nasty streak?

    • Kay 4.1

      Why do so many right wing politicians have such a nasty streak?

      Because the bulk of them are narcissistic, sociopathic and sadistic.

      A 2017 study, done in Austria, but valid pretty much everywhere:

      Narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and everyday sadism were associated with right-wing political orientation, whereas narcissism and psychopathy were associated with political extremism.

      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5680983/

  5. About time too.

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2025/may/30/imane-khelif-must-undergo-mandatory-sex-testing-world-boxing-says

    "All athletes over 18 wishing to compete in a World Boxing owned or sanctioned event will need to undergo a PCR (polymerase chain reaction) genetic test to determine their sex at birth and their eligibility to compete."

    A simple cheek swab will tell the truth.

  6. Drowsy M. Kram 6

    Kiwis weren't granted the opportunity to make submissions on Van Velden's Equal Pay Amendment Bill – passed under urgency without select committe consideration – but you can submit on Seymour's Regulatory Standards Bill. Make NAct count (your submission.)

    What is the regulatory standards bill?

    David Seymour’s Regulatory Standards Bill is a dangerous attack on nature and Te Tiriti. It attempts to lock ACT’s far-right principles into law, making sure that corporate property and profits trump the public good, environmental protection and our founding document.

    https://www.greenpeace.org/aotearoa/story/submission-guide-regulatory-standards-bill/

    https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-29-05-2025/#comment-2035031

    https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-29-05-2025/#comment-2035048

  7. weka 7

    Useful thread on how NZ dairy pricing is created via legislation and market structures. What I want to know now is when the original bill was written, did they foresee the conflict between farm profits and people being able to afford dairy? Or did they think the market would sort that out?

    https://x.com/dairymanNZ/status/1928601213534179824

      • Matiri 7.1.1

        Before the DIRA 2001, there were also cooperatives of dairy farmers and the NZ Dairy Board handled the export and marketing of all dairy products. The key focus was maximising returns to farmers, just as it is now. The NZ consumer was never a key market as 96% of what was produced was exported, just as it is now.

        The DIRA 2001 merged the Dairy Board with the two largest cooperatives, NZ Dairy Group and Kiwi Cooperative Dairies.

        BTW I worked for NZDG before it was merged, and later for Fonterra after the merger. Also we haven’t eaten any dairy products since then funnily enough.

      • Craig H 7.1.2

        https://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_bill/dirb20011391385/

        Policy statements are at the top of the original Bill.

        Notably, maximising economic performance of the dairy industry was one of the priorities, while consumer affordability was not, but they were cognisant of potential detrimental impacts of a monopoly so the industry was put under the regulatory powers and regime of the Commerce Commission.

        https://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_bill/dirb20011392385/ is the second reading – select committee report is at the top of that. No real consideration of consumer affordability there either – it is all about the impact on farmers.

  8. joe90 8

    Since January Musk and Trump have killed more people than Bush and co killed in ten years during the Iraq war.

    /

    There is an Elon Musk post on X, his social media platform, that should define his legacy. “We spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper,” he wrote on Feb. 3. He could have “gone to some great parties. Did that instead.”

    Musk’s absurd scheme to save the government a trillion dollars by slashing “waste, fraud and abuse” has been a failure. DOGE claims it’s saved $175 billion, but experts believe the real number is significantly lower. Meanwhile, according to the Partnership for Public Service, which studies the federal work force, DOGE’s attacks on government personnel — its firings, re-hirings, use of paid administrative leave and all the associated lack of productivity — could cost the government upward of $135 billion this fiscal year, even before the price of defending DOGE’s actions in court. Musk’s rampage through the bureaucracy may not have created any savings at all, and if it did, they were negligible.

    […]

    There is one place, however, where Musk, with the help of his minions, achieved his goals. He did indeed shred U.S.A.I.D. Though a rump operation is now operating inside the State Department, the administration says that it has terminated more than 80 percent of U.S.A.I.D. grants. Brooke Nichols, an associate professor of global health at Boston University, has estimated that these cuts have already resulted in about 300,000 deaths, most of them of children, and will most likely lead to significantly more by the end of the year. That is what Musk’s foray into politics accomplished.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/opinion/elon-musk-doge-usaid.html

    archivedotli

Leave a Comment