[r0b: sorry - you're still serving a ban https://thestandard.org.nz/call-to-teach-consent-in-schools/#comment-1309685 ] [After looking at what you've been up to of late (your submissions dropping into 'pending') I see that you've been actively seeking a ...
HDCA Act s24(5): "An online content host must not disclose any personal information about the complainant or author under privacy principle 11(e)(iv) in section 6 of the Privacy Act 1993, except by order of a District Court Judge or a High Court Judge ...
Not you as you wouldn't do such a thing but there are women and men who have gone out looking for shag, not had much luck, and so settled for the first person who's willing. Did the former give enthusiastic consent? No. But they still consented and ...
Which nonsense? The nonsensical idea about teaching consent in schools. [you've had plenty of time to make an actual case about that and you haven't. You look like an out and out rape apologist. As a moderator I think women, and rape survivors, have more ...
Well since we're talking consent here I'm curious as to how far people think it should go and what people think the definition should be. For example does it need to be explicit? Must it always be enthusiastic? Can it be withdrawn the day after? A week ...
Ask a cop. Generally there are three sorts of rape complaints: 1. Genuine. 2. Revenge. 3. Regret. Here we're talking #3 and fortunately in most cases of #3 it doesn't go much further than the cop noting down the complaint and shaking his head. Not an ...
Fine. I'll rephrase and use fewer words. Do. You. Believe. Con-sent. Can. Be. Ret-ro-act-ive-ly. Withdrawn? [You're the only person running that line here, as a straw man. You've refused to clarify when asked. Stop. trolling. Only. warning. - weka]
So it's ok for someone to have consensual sex with someone (no alcohol or other drugs involved to keep things simple), have a case of regrets the morning after, retroactively withdraw consent, and lay a rape charge?
To be clear we're talking sex here, not taking dirty photos.
It's a simple yes or no question.
I'd like to ask anyone who supports this nonsense one simple question. Do you believe that consent can be withdrawn at any time and for any reason including (and this is the important bit) after the event?
Cops are pretty good at telling fake rape complaints from the real ones. So if a case has made it all the way to trial it's a pretty sure bet the guy is as guilty as sin.
Good grief. Why on earth would you need to do teach consent in schools? Isn't it obvious? For the record in the vast majority of rapes that go to trial consent isn't even an issue. And those rare cases that do go to trial where consent is an issue my guess...
Given the harm that Peter Dunne has caused he doesn't deserve to be listened to. He is an idiot and a disgrace. 1. He allowed far more dangerous synthetic cannabis while keeping real cannabis illegal (his son was/is a lawyer for the synthetic cannabis ...
Saying one nation or protecting our borders or are both racist phrases?
So saying we should be one nation and protect our borders is racist now is it? And for FFS, what are you doing listening to that idiot Peter Dunne? What, is he the Lefts' new hero?
ISIS.
Free speech refers to public speech, not private speech. So a university is entitled to "censor" anybody they want. "Should a university allow a group to have a stall at Orientation that was promoting changes in legislation so that rape is made legal?" Up ...
No, it's a creed founded by a schizophrenic who claimed he talked to angels*. It's only later that it became about eliminating other people. It's why moderates focus on the early verses in the Koran and the extremists focus on the latter verses **. * ...
As Larry Flynt said - you either have free speech or you don't. There is no middle ground.
Obviously it means he's a misogynist.
Out of the 18 deputy pms from 1957 to present only around four have gone on to be pm - most notably Helen Clark and Robert Muldoon. Winston was deputy pm and never got to be pm, same with Anderson and Cullen. Just saying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
'Friendly Troll HUDCAP………you’re showing unusual amount of ‘stuffie’ about Jacinda aren’t you bro’ ?" The convo somehow segwayed into a discussion about "sexism" and "misogyny" because I suggested that Jacinda is only where she is because she has a vagina.
"Probably. Just because you like one woman doesn’t mean that you don’t support the oppression of women in general." That's like me saying because you have a pommie friend doesn't mean that you don't don't like poms in general. "I see you avoided responding...
"As long as we have an old boys network still running the show, voting for vaginas is a valid political act." ie. The same reasoning as positive discrimination. " I’d apply a bit of nuance to that of course. If you have two useless politicians to choose ...
The old schoolboy charm.
Indeed there are. Helen Clark, Hilary Clinton, Gold Meir - to name just a few. But if you don't think Jacinda is where she is because she has a vagina then please tell me how at just 39 years old she's distinguished herself i.e. what has she done? Voting ...
If you think people will vote for her for any reason other than she has a vagina and been on a few womens' magazine covers I have a bridge to sell you.
At least now he can say to her supporters in the Labour party - "Hey, I'm on your side!" Team Andrew and Jacinda. Or "Jandrew" if you prefer.
The identity politics party.
Stab. Stab. Stab. Labour - moving one step closer to being NZ's version of America's Democrat party.
Recent Comments