Power and Knowledge.

Written By: - Date published: 12:36 pm, October 25th, 2018 - 54 comments
Categories: Economy, Environment, International, science - Tags: , ,

There are no neonicotinoids in the jungle of Puerto Rico.

There are no fertilisers in the jungle of Puerto Rico.

There are no swathes of cleared land.

As the Washington Post writes – (here’s a non-Washington Post link for the same article)

If Puerto Rico is the island of enchantment – “la isla del encanto” – then its rain forest is “the enchanted forest on the enchanted isle”, [Bradford Lister – biologist at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute] said.

Birds and coqui frogs trill beneath a 50-foot-tall (15 metre tall) emerald canopy. The forest, named El Yunque, is well-protected. Spanish King Alfonso XII claimed the jungle as a 19th-century royal preserve. Decades later, Theodore Roosevelt made it a national reserve, and El Yunque remains the only tropical rain forest in the National Forest system.

Except that, nice as it looks, it’s dying.

2 trillion tonnes of CO2 dumped into the atmosphere over the course of the Industrial Revolution, that we’re adding to every day, is causing a radical change in the chemical composition of plants. The studies have been done. The results are in. The effects are known.

The carbohydrate to protein content of plants is all ‘up the wop’ due to an increased rate in growth caused by higher CO2 levels. And life depending on plants for sustenance…well, there’s been a 60 fold drop in general bug and insect numbers recorded/trapped in “the enchanted forest on the enchanted isle” between the years 1977 and 2013. What numbers were like prior to 1977 is anyone’s guess.

Precipitous drops in insect numbers, and of anything that subsists on those insects are being catalogued in study after study all over the world. And it’s all down to emissions of carbon dioxide. So, there you go.

Now, what are you going to do with this knowledge?

54 comments on “Power and Knowledge. ”

  1. RedLogix 1

    For the first time Australian company directors have nominated climate change as the number one issue they want the federal government to address in the long term, according to a survey of more than 1,200 company directors.

    The Australian Institute of Company Directors’ (AICD) biannual Director Sentiment Index — based on a survey of 1,252 public and private company directors undertaken between September 13 and 27 — shows directors are heeding warnings from regulators about the risks of climate change and the fact that they may, in future, be held liable for failing to act.

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-25/why-company-directors-have-started-caring-about-climate-change/10423658

    • AB 1.1

      Odds on of course that those company directors want the issue ‘addressed’ in a way that leaves both their companies, and their directorships of them, still intact.

    • Bill 1.2

      So company directors want the Federal Govt to address climate change in the long term?

      That’s nice.

      You get that the post is highlighting the fact that the current 2 trillion tonnes of CO2 that’s swilling around the atmosphere is killing shit at an alarming rate, yes? And you also get that we are adding to the total of CO2 with every passing day, yes?

      Meaning that some company director (or who-ever) talking about the long term serves as much purpose as looking up the arse of dead horse.

      • RedLogix 1.2.1

        It signals a change of attitude that might not mean much today, but could easily become more significant soon enough.

        Or we could just shit on it.

        • Bill 1.2.1.1

          It signals something much worse than “might not mean much today“.

          It signals full blown adherence to a “pretend and extend” mentality that… given they’re talking about “long term” just doesn’t stack up with your suggestion that their attitude “could easily” become significant “soon enough

          Today is (maybe) soon enough – though, given what is being observed and what is known about why those things are being observed, certainly isn’t “soon enough” with regards population drops and extinctions.

          I mean, it’s not as though we get to reverse out of this and set everything back to what it was before. Further, I’d suggest that much of what we’re seeing is not unlike a car smashing through a china shop – a lot of stuff is in the air. Being in the air, it’s still in one piece.

          • RedLogix 1.2.1.1.1

            Ultimately it will be the directors of these companies who will make decisions that will have more beneficial impact on AGW than anyone else.

  2. Stuart Munro 2

    The Washington Post piece refers to this Science article:

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264247848_Defaunation_in_the_Anthropocene

  3. Stuart Munro 3

    The subsequent article on reversing defaunation might be worth a look also.

    • Bill 3.1

      You got a link, or a run down on the thinking?

      Because once it’s acknowledged that the elevated level of CO2 in the atmosphere is the underlying cause of mass die off – and that other phenomena like pesticides or land clearance, though important, are secondary – then the only possibility for any kind of ‘reversal’ comes with a drop in atmospheric concentration of CO2.

      There is little point to (say) reafforestation as a solution if the forest can’t sustain the essential forms of life that form the base of the food chain because of elevated CO2 levels.

      Banning pesticides might slow declines, insofar as malnutrition means various populations/species are perhaps more susceptible to levels of pesticide toxins. But again, and like land reclamation, banning pesticides won’t halt this in its tracks.

      And we don’t know how to suck CO2 from the atmosphere in anything like the quantity that would be required to bring CO2 levels down.

      The best we can do right now, is to stop making the situation worse – which means not adding any more CO2 to the 2 trillion tonnes already there.

      • Stuart Munro 3.1.1

        https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264196235_Reversing_defaunation_Restoring_species_in_a_changing_world

        Not sure that their take is ideal – they’re not the authors of the previous piece so they define the problem somewhat differently.

        Robert Guyton’s diversity and regreening efforts are probably a better approach than single species based approaches in any case – the loss of insect populations is an indicator of broader systemic health problems at the micro level – protists and all that, which are even harder to assay in bulk.

        And of course it’s not coincidental I’ve been beating the algal drum – as a fast CO2 soak not much can beat it, though kudzu might come close, and restoring our coastal macrocystis ‘forest’ would soak up quite a bit.

        These issues don’t interest our politicians much however – I recall trying to interest Pete Hodgson in solar back 2002 – fund a few masters projects I suggested – he sneered at me. And then he blew most of a million on a vanity solar roof for a primary school.

        • Bill 3.1.1.1

          Algae. Well, how much of 5 – 10 billion tonnes of CO2 every year can they absorb? (5 – 10 Gt being a kind of yearly minimum required for decreasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations in a scenario where we weren’t adding anything by way of further emissions).

          And what happens to the CO2 in the algae when it dies?

          Same questions for trees or any other biological ‘sink’.

          We can’t stay at 2 trillion tonnes – it’s quite literally killing life on this planet. We can kill things faster if we emit more I guess (though who knows, there may be an upper limit on any plant growth/CO2 concentration relationship).

          All things being equal, that 2 trillion tonnes will take hundreds upon hundreds of years to begin falling back. Can we do anything beyond stop, and try to deal with what we’ve already created? And (rhetorical) why aren’t we taking even that minimum course of action?

          • Stuart Munro 3.1.1.1.1

            Algae grows faster than any other CO2 soak. And it depends on how much you grow – but the wet area of the globe is greater than the dry, so it starts ahead of some options.

            Stopping isn’t really an option – all we can do is divert to more sustainable models reasonably quickly. Of course governments aren’t doing that for the same reason we can’t get a CGT passed. They’re not as dedicated to public welfare as they like to pretend.

          • Incognito 3.1.1.1.2

            And what happens to the CO2 in the algae when it dies?

            Same questions for trees or any other biological ‘sink’.

            Do you think all CO2 will be released back into the atmosphere? Surely, this would depend on how and where they decay, the decay process? And there will be a time lag?

            • patricia bremner 3.1.1.1.2.1

              Apparently bamboo is great for carbon sequestering, and is useful and non toxic.

              • Incognito

                I believe the thinking is that the sequestering of carbon by plants, etc., is only temporary till they decay or get burnt and release all the CO2 back into the atmosphere. The other part seems to be that the CO2 output is and has been exceeding the natural sequestration process with the resulting increase in atmospheric CO2 levels.

                • KJT

                  Not correct as plants are always growing, multiplying and renewing in nature. True for individual plants, but not for a forest

                  For example. If we had left the Amazon rain forests in their natural State they would be absorbing a magnitude more carbon.

                  If we grew trees, and burn them without replanting, then the carbon is re released.

                  If the timber is used for housing, then the carbon is not released for decades.

                  • Bill

                    For example. If we had left the Amazon rain forests in their natural State they would be absorbing a magnitude more carbon.

                    There is currently 2 trillion tonnes of excess CO2 in our atmosphere and we’re stacking about 40 billion tonnes on top of that every year. (About 20x what the amazon absorbs every year)

                    Which, to offer some perspective –

                    Asner surveyed the Amazon rainforest of southern Peru – an area about the size of Switzerland – to figure out the exact amount of carbon locked up in its trees. Asner used lasers from above and also ground observations to create a 3-D map. He discovered this particular area of the Amazon stored 395 million metric tonnes of carbon. That’s a lot – but about 20-25% less carbon than scientists previously estimated.

                    https://earthsky.org/earth/greg-asner-on-carbon-in-the-amazon-rainforest

  4. WeTheBleeple 4

    No Bill. What are YOU going to do with this knowledge.

    You are the one sharing it. What is your point?

    Do you think we don’t know of climate change and mass extinction and, and, and….

    What are YOU hoping to achieve?

    Gee, thanks for dropping the knowledge bombs on us ignorant peasants.

    • Bill 4.1

      I think I might follow your lead and shoot the messenger or messengers, as I retreat into some kind of hopeless angry denial.

      • patricia bremner 4.1.1

        Don’t do that BILL. Your posts are always thought provoking and require more personal research. Thanks.

  5. Yep that jungle is fucked.

    I assume equatorial regions will suffer the most but I’m not sure why I think that? Probably irrelevant in the larger picture.

    I already miss those squashed bugs on the windscreen. We’ve really stuffed so much up.

  6. WeTheBleeple 6

    Same shit different day. What are you going to do Bill?

    Is it not OK for us to challenge you but you can guilt trip your readers and regurgitate whatever climate cause of the day you’ve been reading.

    You’re the one who threw out the challenge.

    So put up or shut up.

    What are you doing?

    • Bill 6.1

      Be more precise.

      Because if you simply mean not driving, not flying and being conscious of the carbon consequences of my actions, habits and decisions, then quite a lot – but in the full knowledge those things all amount to nothing because the problem is structural.

      If you mean bailing up politicians and/or policy makers when they spout bullshit, then I do that as the opportunity arises.

      If you mean constantly seeking to inform myself and then trying to disseminate useful information, or exploring better ways to make things more understandable, then I do that.

      If you mean exploring ideas and/or scenarios that would kill our use of fossil, and talking about those things, then I do that.

      If you mean giving a flying fuck about your feelings (and let’s face it, that’s what your comments here are about) then you got me. I don’t care.

      What you do with the knowledge you have is your affair. If you’d rather wrap yourself in a blanket of ignorant bliss…well, sorry, (no I’m not) but you can’t unknow stuff.

  7. WeTheBleeple 7

    But ‘wrapping myself in a blanket of ignorance’ is so cosy.

    I’m not calling you on imaginary shit mate, I’m calling you on pumping out consternation with no regards to offering solutions in any form.

    And when people try to offer ideas, you and your ‘burn it all down’ mates leap on them. Because you don’t want solutions do you. You want to ‘bring down the system’ like some anarchic teen.

    Or have you moved on from that now.

    But I am the man with a problem, cos I think it’s posturing BS.

    Scare mongering, and climbing on your high horse.

  8. WeTheBleeple 8

    OK I cede my approach is a bit shit.

    I dont think this article is helping anyone. Let alone the insects.

    You tell people their efforts are pointless e.g. planting trees, why do you bother watching how you travel etc then?

    We all need to do these little bits. Waiting for the governments to do big bits is folly. We can pressure, we can hope…

    All the small things are what killed the insects. Cutting down the trees. Depleting the top soils. Introducing the cides. Knocking the biodiversity…

    All the small things need to be addressed.

    You throw hope out with your attitude to others contributions. Nihilistic almost.

    Like you are the only guy who knows whats up.

    It’s a bit off. If you’re the ex-notley st Bill, for you, it seems a lot off.

    • Bill 8.1

      So, we agree that pressuring government might be worthwhile?

      Okay. But to pressure them into replanting trees (say), even if successful, isn’t going to stop or alleviate global warming or its effects.

      And yes, we should ban the insecticides and build up diversity and all the rest of it. But again, it’s not going to stop or alleviate global warming or its effects.

      There is one thing we can do. We can stop putting CO2 from fossil fuels and bio fuels into the atmosphere. That won’t reverse the damage that’s been done. I doubt it would halt the decline across species or in species numbers, or halt any number of other negative things immediately.

      But unless we do that one thing, then everything from extinction rates to sea level rise to utterly devastating weather events and broader climatic conditions will continue to worsen.

      Unfortunately, right now we have politicians and policy makers who have a greater concern for the impacts of different carbon scenarios on economics than they have for the impacts on any non-economic front.

      When that last IPCC report revised carbon budgets upwards in line with empirical measurements, the clock essentially got wound back. A little. So now we are back to the situation that scientists and their prescriptions from unrevised IPCC carbon budgets were at 10 years ago – we cut emissions by 11% per year until we get to zero emissions from energy, or we create an environment that much now crawling, running or flying on this planet won’t survive.

      Thankfully, it seems as though growing numbers of scientists are now being vocal in calling out the IPCC and the effect that economists have been allowed to wield on reports.

      And it seems, also thankfully, that we also have growing numbers of scientists doing the studies and calling bullshit on idiot notions like Green Growth and economic driven fixes like carbon taxes/prices.

      That and more can lead to pressure on government.

      But it also means that people like you and me are going to have to give it up, where ‘it’ is the personal and intergenerational expectations that have flowed from doing things in a particular way.

      Will anyone ‘give it up’ if we kid ourselves that a solution lies in some accumulation of planting trees, going vegan, or changing a light bulb or shower head?

      Or will we only ‘give it up’ when we acknowledge that it’s not really a choice; that no matter how many of those “small things” we address (and they should be addressed) that unless we dump fossil and all other carbon emitting sources and forms of energy as fast as we can regardless of mere economic consequences, then we’re done for?

      All those “small things” , no matter how numerous or widespread, will be undone or neutralised by rising CO2 levels. That’s the deal we”re dealing in. And yes, it’s kind of shite, but hey.

  9. WeTheBleeple 9

    I guess I’m one of those scientists calling BS. Economists are a bunch of self important tea leavers inconsequential to helping in any real way.

    I apologise for getting antsy with you, it’s more I was antsy about the message being vital yet ineffective. You’d share a similar frustration, 100’s of comments for JLR… Nobody knows what to say here, bar a few die-hard faithful.

    You have a platform. I thank you for having a go. Go harder. 😀

    To help the insects plant some damn trees, and shrubs, and grass, and smoke the grass and meditate on nature, and make some wild spots, and stop spraying shit, and don’t drive over the trees in your damn SUV, and stop sniffing petrol, and, and, and…

    I can’t comment well on Puerto Rico I have not studied that environment. I’d hazard a guess the areas surrounding the rainforest are disturbed. Biodiversity is correlated with area (Species area relationship) so as the rainforest area entire diminishes so does the diversity. The area is now a source surrounded by sinks (Source sink theory). Insects fly out, but they are no longer flying in. This exacerbates already declining rates from other factors e.g. climate change. Being an island I’d hazard a guess it relies on imported propagules for genetic continuation (Theory of Island Biogeography).

    In addition to this, smaller populations have slower rates of micro-evolution. So as with many other things, there is likely an unknown tipping point at which a population might decline – they no longer have enough genetic material to adapt – Environmental change (biotic) is constant and in a community very dynamic. One doesn’t even need a catalyst like climate change, insofar as evolution goes, we’re all running on the spot just to keep up (Red Queen Effect). So you get the area decline, surrounded by sinks, as populations dwindle to ecological and genetic insignificance forcing more pressure on themselves, and adjacent organisms – then add the CO2 altering plant physiology…

    A giant clusterfuck. To put it scientifically.

    Again, I had a point but was a bit blunt. We can’t throw our hands up in despair. We can’t treat tree planting like a futile affair. I was mirroring your attitude to other folks efforts/suggestions when I lambasted yours.

    It all counts. And in a world of disinformation, hammer that home. Every little bit you can, let’s do this. HA!

    Today I’ve been converting dumb-ass lawn to awesome permaculture. Go team!

    I’m an Aspie, that excuses everything.

    • Bill 9.1

      Just going to say that El Yunque is the same size now as it was in the 70s (it was designated as a Royal Preserve in the 1800s) and sure, it’s not the largest at just under 30 000 acres.

      On the pesticide front, it’s use throughout Puerto Rico has fallen by more than 80% since 1969.

      And to repeat, in article after study, biologists are fairly up front on the fact they are clutching at straws and casting around to explain decline – whether in N Europe, Puerto Rico, Africa….

      And the one condition that applies to every single location of study is elevated CO2 levels. The studies have been done on the effects of boosting growth rates in plants (through CO2) and in phytoplankton (extra light).

      The consequences are known. They have been measured and are the same in both scenarios (there’s a crash in nutritional value). The knock on effects have been scientifically evaluated and measured in the instance of phytoplankton and zoo plankton (easily isolated and gathered for analysis) – the zoo plankton struggles and dies because of the nutrient crash within the phytoplankton.

      Meanwhile, apart from the goldenrod study that measured nutrient levels going all the way back to 1845(?) (they dropped in line with rising CO2), the intro to that paper begins – As has been observed in nearly a 100 individual studies and several meta-analyses, as atmospheric carbon dioxide (Ca) increases, nitrogen (protein) concentration declines in a wide range of plant species

      I’m not throwing my hands up in despair. I want that politicians and policy makers get real and get in behind getting rid of carbon. And the easier it is to smack a succinct and effective 2×4 across their mealy chops when they splab nonsense, the better. And the more other people around who are aware of precisely what’s what, the better too 😉

      • RedLogix 9.1.1

        And they way they will get rid of carbon is a step change of our systems from a carbon basis to a whole raft of new non-carbon technologies.

        Certainly there is the opportunity for the developed world to step back from the excessive consumption that an unconstrained, untrammeled materialism has evoked in the decades since the end of WW2. We probably could scale back our energy consumption to say 1950’s levels without much impact on our modern lives … and we’d likely be personally better off for it.

        But that only works for the golden billion or so who live in the developed world. It still leaves the other 6 billion hovering uncertainly just out of absolute poverty, but still not yet past that U$10k pa level which gets them over the threshold of scarcity, and participating in the modern world. And if they all come online as it where, at the current energy and resource intensity of the rest of the world … we know it’s entirely impossible.

        The only way this can work, the only path out of mass inequality, is this technological transition. And we stand on the cusp of it. The Oil Age was a stepping stone, oil gave us cheap easy access to enough energy to develop a high enough tech to move past it. And it is happening even if it is going to be a close run thing. The outcome is not clear at all; we do stand a real chance of hitting the wall badly; but what other bet do we have?

      • WeTheBleeple 9.1.2

        Absolutely. I agree. CO2 is the Elephant in the room.

        Some of your reply there was more succinct than the article. You have a pertinent message.

        I appreciate any efforts by any to talk to politicians. I guess in that regard I have largely given up. The last lot could turn a thinking person into a wrecker and hater.

        Rolling our sleeves up is the obvious (only real) choice. It would be great to have governments of the world on board, someone’s gotta bludgeon em. I’m not holding my breath they’ll do so much but every bit counts there too.

        Building sustainability and resilience into systems where we can. That’s my cup of tea. Adaptation. Where I can pitch in. I had a conversation tonight as we surveyed adjoining sections and what varieties of trees and this years veg would go in across the area entire to service both households. And what a mate was growing round the corner. Imagine streets like that… Actual planned urban agriculture creating beautiful edible landscapes en masse. A whole industry springs up with ecologist/permie gardeners taking our food to the next level. Nice.

        Food miles mostly gone in a few short years. But you know how well things could be done, I bet. Can’t take food security off the chemists job description though, what would they do with nitrate then, back to bombs?

        All this oil to divest from, who’re the biggest players.

        1. Agriculture. 2. Alcohol and Tobacco. 3. Pharmaceuticals.

        Right there you can see huge changes could be wrought by cleaning up agriculture, and the agriculture supporting alcohol and tobacco…

        And we could grow a shit ton of weed to reduce all the damn pills and poisons and concrete and artificial cloth and…

        These three culprits. They’re prime for picking on.

        But after all that. Who doesn’t need a drink and an aspirin?

  10. SPC 10

    This sort of refutes the claim of some that global warming is good for growth … but not all growth is good …

    Its like people eating more food but getting less nutrition.

  11. Ed 11

    What are YOU going to do with this knowledge.

    I stopped eating meat.
    And get pilloried on this site for trying to encourage other people to follow suit.

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/may/31/avoiding-meat-and-dairy-is-single-biggest-way-to-reduce-your-impact-on-earth

    However, the main thing that has to happen is the ending of capitalism.
    It is the system that is killing the planet.

    https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/jul/10/100-fossil-fuel-companies-investors-responsible-71-global-emissions-cdp-study-climate-change

    • RedLogix 11.1

      The ‘end of capitalism’ … is a murderous fantasy. For better or worse it’s the foundation of our economic system, upon which most of 7 billion lives depend. Kicking it over, without any sense of some proven system that might replace it would result in mass chaos, starvation and death on an unthinkable scale.

      Actually it’s probably not all that unthinkable … I suspect it’s quite a common dark fantasy.

      • adam 11.1.1

        And your option, is to let everyone and everything die, because you can’t think of a system other than Liberalism – is that called right thinking is it?

        • RedLogix 11.1.1.1

          Why reduce this to two choices? Why do we have to choose between the ‘end of capitalism’ and ‘business as usual’?

          Of course there are alternatives to Liberalism, but all of them are either historic failures we’ve tried and been burnt by, or untested ideologies with even bleaker prospects of success. But neither does this mean that we are stuck with unconstrained neo-liberal capitalism forever, it too will evolve and change.

          Progress is incremental, you take what works now and you improve on it. Centuries of painstaking, painfully slow progress, with many brutal mistakes along the way. This is life; there are no easy shortcuts.

          And then every now and then something emerges, some an idea, technology or shift in consciousness changes everything within decades, the new arising, subjugating and replacing the old with remarkable energy and speed.

          • Bill 11.1.1.1.1

            Couple of points here Red.

            Liberal capitalism has sent billions into poverty, not raised billions out as commonly accepted myth would have us believe.

            BAU is growth. Capitalism depends on growth. But we don’t need growth to satisfy our needs – we just need to share what we have in a better fashion and everyone will be fine.

            And I’d argue to your supposedly “common dark fantasy” … growth and a finite planet is what will inevitably lead to a murderous end game.

            Following on from that, any economy not based on chrematistic notions of wealth would be a huge leap in the right direction.

            Progress isn’t locked or chained to the past in the way you suggest. The most obvious and widely known counter to that is the Copernican Revolution that was a wholesale break from past thought/ideas…although you do seem to signal that in your final para that essentially contradicts what you said in the penultimate para.

            • RedLogix 11.1.1.1.1.1

              Liberal capitalism has sent billions into poverty, not raised billions out as commonly accepted myth would have us believe.

              Compared to when? Are you suggesting we’re worse off than 200 years ago? For most of human history most people (like > 98%) lived in absolute, grinding, brute poverty. Most ordinary people (the kind history doesn’t say much about) lived short, tough lives as slaves, serfs or in some form of collective servitude.

              For most of human history, life was very difficult for most people. People lacked basic medicines and died relatively young. They had no painkillers, and people with ailments spent much of their lives in agonizing pain. Entire families lived in bug-infested dwellings that offered neither comfort nor privacy. They worked in the fields from sunrise to sunset, yet hunger and famines were commonplace. Transportation was primitive, and most people never traveled beyond their native villages or nearest towns. Ignorance and illiteracy were rife. The “good old days” were, by and large, very bad for the great majority of humankind.

              Average global life expectancy at birth hovered around 30 years from the Upper Paleolithic to 1900. Even in the richest countries, such as those of Western Europe, life expectancy at the start of the 20th century rarely exceeded 50 years. Incomes were quite stagnant, too. At the beginning of the Common Era (CE), annual GDP per person around the world ranged from $600 to $800. As late as 1820, it was only $712 (measured in 1990 international dollars).

              Humanity has made enormous progress—especially over the course of the past two centuries. For example, average life expectancy in the world today is almost 72 years. In 2010, global GDP per person stood at $7,814—over 10 times more than two centuries ago (measured in 1990 international dollars).

              https://humanprogress.org/about#sec3

              In very rough terms about one billion people live in the developed world, at a standard their great-grandparents could scarcely dream of. Absolute poverty is now constrained mainly to the bottom billion or so, many in just two countries, India and Nigeria. The five or so billion in between are making remarkable progress; they’re accessing electricity, water and the modern world at a staggering pace.

              My experience tells me this; if you want to solve a big problem, you start by competently solving the little ones immediately in front of you.

              • KJT

                It wasn’t capitalism that has made so many better off.

                It has been human co-operation and sharing of knowledge.

                For example. The USA’s, formerly, excellent public education system which produced scientists, engineers and technicians by the millions.

                Their return to unbridled capitalism is producing financiers, speculators and experts on blowing people up, while their infrastructure, environment and society, decay. It is very obvious in the USA, that the States with the most regulation and redistribution are propping up the right wing States.

                I am not anti capitalist. I am a capitalist businessman, myself.

                Capitalism however, only works at the level of many small competing businesses. It falls over very quickly at a larger scale, without a healthy dose of regulation and redistribution. Socialism!

                One is unworkable without the other.

                Note; we do not fight wars with private armies anymore. They are too inefficient. AGW requires the same sort of mass social effort, as a world war.

                Investment Capitalism’s requirement for infinite growth, in a finite world, is such an obvious contradiction it is surprising people still believe it.

                The “magic of compound interest” is just that. A sleight of hand that can only exist if inflation makes the real interest rate zero. Otherwise it is depending on an, impossible, continual growth. Addressing money and credit so we can have a viable, steady state, economy, is essential.

                • RedLogix

                  It falls over very quickly at a larger scale, without a healthy dose of regulation and redistribution. Socialism!

                  Yes; my beef here is with the ‘all private owership is theft’ marxists here who keep blithering on about the ‘end of capitalism’. It’s a dangerous distraction and weakens the left.

                  Private ownership is a core feature of economic systems, alongside the notion of public good. The two ideas function in tension with each other, yet both degenerate into the tyranny of libetarianism on one hand, or communism on the other, in the absence of it’s counterpoised force.

                  For much of my adult life it’s plain that NZ has allowed the balance to tilt too far towards private property rights and allowed the public good to be discounted. We need to shift, but the left cannot do this intelligently if hecklers from the far left keep insisting we have to burn the barn down to save it.

          • adam 11.1.1.1.2

            ‘This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism.’

      • Drowsy M. Kram 11.1.2

        1. Sustainable human population growth. [Go forth…]
        2. Sustainable capitalism. [It’s been towed beyond the environment.]
        3. Anthropogenic global warming.
        4. The Rapture.

        All dark fantasies, or results thereof.

        https://cleantechnica.com/2018/04/05/why-white-evangelicals-dont-care-about-climate-change/

        • RedLogix 11.1.2.1

          Yeah; it’s like we’re only allowed two responses; head up the arse denialism or headless chook catastrophism.

          • Drowsy M. Kram 11.1.2.1.1

            Don’t know many headless chooks, but think our ‘goose’ is cooked.

            Humankind is all sorts of fearful, too afraid to collectively pursue the percentage (albeit still risky) options (big leaps). And current capitalism, for all its benefits, is also a sinister threat.

            Despite (or maybe because of) our ‘smarts’, civilisation will go the way of the ‘boiling frog’, as depicted 12 years ago in ‘An Inconvenient Truth’. So no Internet! No blogs!

            Too bleak? Then please keep calm and carry on leapfrogging one another.

          • adam 11.1.2.1.2

            What a load of crap – people here have offended solutions, many actually. Would you like a list?

            The block is, and always will be corporations. If you have not worked that out yet, you have not been paying attention.

  12. WeTheBleeple 12

    Well. It’s the law demanding the CEO’s make profit for shareholders.

    It’s the multi millions (how many?) of shareholders who invest in exploitative industries.

    It’s the lawmakers who fail to address corporate structure for fear of losing influence with corporate players.

    It is the sociopaths who hire (shit) scientists to lie to us, to keep the controversy alive aka tobacco, aka GE, aka global warming. The losers who use false claims to keep the argument alive, they are very seriously guilty. It is the citizens and journalists with no science training or even understanding in many cases, who bla bla bla repeat shit just to hear themselves.

    It is the losers who point out others doing little to justify why we shouldn’t bother trying (Cameron Slater).

    It is the growth model for a finite ecosystem.

    It is all your dollars spent on their products to keep them rich. All my dollars. It is a monopolistic film of filth enveloping the planet.

    It is the idolisation of these sociopaths.

    It is the naive belief technology will step in and save the day.

    It is the naive belief technology will save BAU.

    It is Kardashian gossip over Kermit’s plight.

    It is the digital division of views so those with important messages only preach to the choir.

    It is the shitty mainstream media feeding out corporate lines.

    It is the universities pithy ‘applied science’ approach stifling creativity and discovery in preference for hard profits. It is the corporate partnerships they’re all signing up for.

    It is corporate influence in politics and education.

    It is churches, and their Armageddon mythology.

    It is the entitled public that prefer to whinge and moan than act.

    It is the talk talk talk talker with no action plan that simply turns people away.

    It is the Joe average who knows all this and does nothing.

    It is most all of us in the rat race.

    Washing your hands of it all to go bush is not a solution either. the States has plenty of preppers hiding in the hills with guns. What are those losers going to fix?

    I’ve lived in the bush here. Fact. You would starve.

    I (and many others) know where the maps are to all the bunkers rich people have made all over Auckland. Fact, not safe. Fact, you are fucking dreaming. Half these idiots built them below the water line.

    Mega rich or meat.

    The middle class and small business mean nothing to these people.

    It is your delusions of grandeur.

    It is waiting for God.

    • corodale 12.1

      Join with God, by living in harmony with spiritual ideals of Kindness.
      Show the leadership of Ecological Wisdom in your own surroundings.
      By positively dying a good-death, we create the foundations for new life.

    • cleangreen 12.2

      1000% Bill.

      WeTheBleeple 12 has nailed it here too!!!!!

      This is the problem;

      When I was a Green Party member in 1999 we had a hardcore ecological group in the GP but not now sadly.

      No where since 2005 did I ever see during the 13 years since then did I see the Green Party clearly place ‘the blowtorch on the former Government these serious toxic issues’ facing us all that was clearly depicted in Rachel Carson’s “gold standard book “The Silent Spring”.

      http://www.environmentandsociety.org/exhibitions/silent-spring/overview

      I left the Party in 2003.

      I would return to GP if the Party got back to the basics of what Rachel Carson woke the world up to then.

  13. WeTheBleeple 13

    ^^ It is answers so difficult and issues so large people throw in the towel and turn to spiritualist or religious nonsense.

    Many of those yankee preppers are waiting for Jesus and voting for Trump.

    It is Idiocracy the movie morphed into a reality show.

  14. cleangreen 15

    WeTheBleeple

    Here is the truth of the way corporations have made rail pay for their infrastructure bur roads are subsidised in the US so we need to level the playing field to “encourage rail use again and move away from a ‘high carbon freight transport mode’.

    quote;
    “In the U.S., railroads own their own tracks, so they have to build their own infrastructure,” says Vaishnav, an assistant research professor in EPP. “Trucking uses public infrastructure, but does not bear the full cost of the damage heavy trucks do to roads and other infrastructure and indeed to the environment.”

    Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-10-shipping-freight-rail-environment.html#jCp

    https://phys.org/news/2018-10-shipping-freight-rail-environment.html

  15. Brutus Iscariot 16

    “Now, what are you going to do with this knowledge?”

    Tweet.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • EV road user charges bill passes
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed the passing of legislation to move light electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) into the road user charges system from 1 April.  “It was always intended that EVs and PHEVs would be exempt from road user charges until they reached two ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    18 hours ago
  • Bill targets illegal, unregulated fishing in international waters
    New Zealand is strengthening its ability to combat illegal fishing outside its domestic waters and beef up regulation for its own commercial fishers in international waters through a Bill which had its first reading in Parliament today. The Fisheries (International Fishing and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 2023 sets out stronger ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Reserve Bank appointments
    Economists Carl Hansen and Professor Prasanna Gai have been appointed to the Reserve Bank Monetary Policy Committee, Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced today. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is the independent decision-making body that sets the Official Cash Rate which determines interest rates.  Carl Hansen, the executive director of Capital ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • Stronger protections for apartment owners
    Apartment owners and buyers will soon have greater protections as further changes to the law on unit titles come into effect, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “The Unit Titles (Strengthening Body Corporate Governance and Other Matters) Amendment Act had already introduced some changes in December 2022 and May 2023, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    23 hours ago
  • Travel focused on traditional partners and Middle East
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters will travel to Egypt and Europe from this weekend.    “This travel will focus on a range of New Zealand’s traditional diplomatic and security partnerships while enabling broad engagement on the urgent situation in Gaza,” Mr Peters says.   Mr Peters will attend the NATO Foreign ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    23 hours ago
  • Keep safe on our roads this Easter
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown is encouraging all road users to stay safe, plan their journeys ahead of time, and be patient with other drivers while travelling around this Easter long weekend. “Road safety is a responsibility we all share, and with increased traffic on our roads expected this Easter we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Cost of living support for over 1.4 million Kiwis
    About 1.4 million New Zealanders will receive cost of living relief through increased government assistance from April 1 909,000 pensioners get a boost to Superannuation, including 5000 veterans 371,000 working-age beneficiaries will get higher payments 45,000 students will see an increase in their allowance Over a quarter of New Zealanders ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Tenancy reviews for social housing restart
    Ensuring social housing is being provided to those with the greatest needs is front of mind as the Government restarts social housing tenancy reviews, Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka says. “Our relentless focus on building a strong economy is to ensure we can deliver better public services such as social ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary plan halted
    The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary will not go ahead, with Cabinet deciding to stop work on the proposed reserve and remove the Bill that would have established it from Parliament’s order paper. “The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary Bill would have created a 620,000 sq km economic no-go zone,” Oceans and Fisheries Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Cutting all that dam red tape
    Dam safety regulations are being amended so that smaller dams won’t be subject to excessive compliance costs, Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on reducing costs and removing unnecessary red tape so we can get the economy back on track.  “Dam safety regulations ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Drought support extended to parts of North Island
    The coalition Government is expanding the medium-scale adverse event classification to parts of the North Island as dry weather conditions persist, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced today. “I have made the decision to expand the medium-scale adverse event classification already in place for parts of the South Island to also cover the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Passage of major tax bill welcomed
    The passing of legislation giving effect to coalition Government tax commitments has been welcomed by Finance Minister Nicola Willis.  “The Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill will help place New Zealand on a more secure economic footing, improve outcomes for New Zealanders, and make our tax system ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Lifting economy through science, tertiary sectors
    Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Judith Collins and Tertiary Education and Skills Minister Penny Simmonds today announced plans to transform our science and university sectors to boost the economy. Two advisory groups, chaired by Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, will advise the Government on how these sectors can play a greater ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government announces Budget priorities
    The Budget will deliver urgently-needed tax relief to hard-working New Zealanders while putting the government’s finances back on a sustainable track, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says.  The Finance Minister made the comments at the release of the Budget Policy Statement setting out the Government’s Budget objectives. “The coalition Government intends ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government to consider accommodation solution
    The coalition Government will look at options to address a zoning issue that limits how much financial support Queenstown residents can get for accommodation. Cabinet has agreed on a response to the Petitions Committee, which had recommended the geographic information MSD uses to determine how much accommodation supplement can be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government approves extension to Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care
    Cabinet has agreed to a short extension to the final reporting timeframe for the Royal Commission into Abuse in Care from 28 March 2024 to 26 June 2024, Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden says.                                         “The Royal Commission wrote to me on 16 February 2024, requesting that I consider an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • $18m boost for Kiwis travelling to health treatment
    The coalition Government is delivering an $18 million boost to New Zealanders needing to travel for specialist health treatment, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says.   “These changes are long overdue – the National Travel Assistance (NTA) scheme saw its last increase to mileage and accommodation rates way back in 2009.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • PM’s Prizes for Space to showcase sector’s talent
    The Government is recognising the innovative and rising talent in New Zealand’s growing space sector, with the Prime Minister and Space Minister Judith Collins announcing the new Prime Minister’s Prizes for Space today. “New Zealand has a growing reputation as a high-value partner for space missions and research. I am ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Concerns conveyed to China over cyber activity
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed New Zealand’s concerns about cyber activity have been conveyed directly to the Chinese Government.     “The Prime Minister and Minister Collins have expressed concerns today about malicious cyber activity, attributed to groups sponsored by the Chinese Government, targeting democratic institutions in both New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Independent Reviewers appointed for School Property Inquiry
    Independent Reviewers appointed for School Property Inquiry Education Minister Erica Stanford today announced the appointment of three independent reviewers to lead the Ministerial Inquiry into the Ministry of Education’s School Property Function.  The Inquiry will be led by former Minister of Foreign Affairs Murray McCully. “There is a clear need ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Brynderwyns open for Easter
    State Highway 1 across the Brynderwyns will be open for Easter weekend, with work currently underway to ensure the resilience of this critical route being paused for Easter Weekend to allow holiday makers to travel north, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Today I visited the Brynderwyn Hills construction site, where ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Speech to the Infrastructure Funding & Financing Conference
    Introduction Good morning to you all, and thanks for having me bright and early today. I am absolutely delighted to be the Minister for Infrastructure alongside the Minister of Housing and Resource Management Reform. I know the Prime Minister sees the three roles as closely connected and he wants me ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Parliamentary network breached by the PRC
    New Zealand stands with the United Kingdom in its condemnation of People’s Republic of China (PRC) state-backed malicious cyber activity impacting its Electoral Commission and targeting Members of the UK Parliament. “The use of cyber-enabled espionage operations to interfere with democratic institutions and processes anywhere is unacceptable,” Minister Responsible for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • NZ to provide support for Solomon Islands election
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Defence Minister Judith Collins today announced New Zealand will provide logistics support for the upcoming Solomon Islands election. “We’re sending a team of New Zealand Defence Force personnel and two NH90 helicopters to provide logistics support for the election on 17 April, at the request ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • NZ-EU FTA gains Royal Assent for 1 May entry to force
    The European Union Free Trade Agreement Legislation Amendment Bill received Royal Assent today, completing the process for New Zealand’s ratification of its free trade agreement with the European Union.    “I am pleased to announce that today, in a small ceremony at the Beehive, New Zealand notified the European Union ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • COVID-19 inquiry attracts 11,000 submissions
    Public consultation on the terms of reference for the Royal Commission into COVID-19 Lessons has concluded, Internal Affairs Minister Hon Brooke van Velden says.  “I have been advised that there were over 11,000 submissions made through the Royal Commission’s online consultation portal.” Expanding the scope of the Royal Commission of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Families to receive up to $75 a week help with ECE fees
    Hardworking families are set to benefit from a new credit to help them meet their early childcare education (ECE) costs, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. From 1 July, parents and caregivers of young children will be supported to manage the rising cost of living with a partial reimbursement of their ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Unlocking a sustainable, low-emissions future
    A specialised Independent Technical Advisory Group (ITAG) tasked with preparing and publishing independent non-binding advice on the design of a "green" (sustainable finance) taxonomy rulebook is being established, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says.  “Comprising experts and market participants, the ITAG's primary goal is to deliver comprehensive recommendations to the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Chief of Army thanked for his service
    Defence Minister Judith Collins has thanked the Chief of Army, Major General John Boswell, DSD, for his service as he leaves the Army after 40 years. “I would like to thank Major General Boswell for his contribution to the Army and the wider New Zealand Defence Force, undertaking many different ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Minister to meet Australian counterparts and Manufacturing Industry Leaders
    25 March 2024 Minister to meet Australian counterparts and Manufacturing Industry Leaders Small Business, Manufacturing, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly will travel to Australia for a series of bi-lateral meetings and manufacturing visits. During the visit, Minister Bayly will meet with his Australian counterparts, Senator Tim Ayres, Ed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Government commits nearly $3 million for period products in schools
    Government commits almost $3 million for period products in schools The Coalition Government has committed $2.9 million to ensure intermediate and secondary schools continue providing period products to those who need them, Minister of Education Erica Stanford announced today. “This is an issue of dignity and ensuring young women don’t ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Speech – Making it easier to build.
    Good morning, it’s great to be here.   First, I would like to acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of Building Surveyors and thank you for the opportunity to be here this morning.  I would like to use this opportunity to outline the Government’s ambitious plan and what we hope to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Pacific youth to shine from boost to Polyfest
    Minister for Pacific Peoples Dr Shane Reti has announced the Government’s commitment to the Auckland Secondary Schools Māori and Pacific Islands Cultural Festival, more commonly known as Polyfest. “The Ministry for Pacific Peoples is a longtime supporter of Polyfest and, as it celebrates 49 years in 2024, I’m proud to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • 2024 Ngarimu VC and 28th (Māori) Battalion Memorial Scholarships announced
    ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Speech to Breast Cancer Foundation – Insights Conference
    Before moving onto the substance of today’s address, I want to recognise the very significant and ongoing contribution the Breast Cancer Foundation makes to support the lives of New Zealand women and their families living with breast cancer. I very much enjoy working with you. I also want to recognise ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Kiwi research soars to International Space Station
    New Zealand has notched up a first with the launch of University of Canterbury research to the International Space Station, Science, Innovation and Technology and Space Minister Judith Collins says. The hardware, developed by Dr Sarah Kessans, is designed to operate autonomously in orbit, allowing scientists on Earth to study ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Speech to the New Zealand Planning Institute
    Introduction Thank you for inviting me to speak with you today and I’m sorry I can’t be there in person. Yesterday I started in Wellington for Breakfast TV, spoke to a property conference in Auckland, and finished the day speaking to local government in Christchurch, so it would have been ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Support for Northland emergency response centre
    The Coalition Government is contributing more than $1 million to support the establishment of an emergency multi-agency coordination centre in Northland. Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell announced the contribution today during a visit of the Whangārei site where the facility will be constructed.  “Northland has faced a number ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Celebrating 20 years of Whakaata Māori
    New Zealanders have enjoyed a broader range of voices telling the story of Aotearoa thanks to the creation of Whakaata Māori 20 years ago, says Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka. The minister spoke at a celebration marking the national indigenous media organisation’s 20th anniversary at their studio in Auckland on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Some commercial fishery catch limits increased
    Commercial catch limits for some fisheries have been increased following a review showing stocks are healthy and abundant, Ocean and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The changes, along with some other catch limit changes and management settings, begin coming into effect from 1 April 2024. "Regular biannual reviews of fish ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-03-28T22:53:09+00:00