In the movie V ..Hugo weaving character is introduced by circumventing the national broadcasters security....eg the media is completely controlled by the completely corrupt govt...very 1984. Natalie Portmans character..evey..is needed to do this. https://m...
It's called Neutrality..like India. This post is...I think..the best Op yet..thought provoking and prescient. Who supplied weapons to Saddam to kill invaders in 2003.. who defended Serbia in 1999..was afghanistan 2001 justified?...oh that's right..it never...
It's called Neutrality..like India. This post is...I think..the best Op yet..thought provoking and prescient. Who supplied weapons to Saddam to kill invaders in 2003.. who defended Serbia in 1999..was afghanistan 2001 justified?...oh that's right..it never...
You make an excellent point about blinken and Taiwan spc. I am looking at it from a military standpoint. Your right ..it seems china is just as guilty as the u.s in this regard. My question would be better phrased...if Taiwan chose neutrality with no ...
When soviet union retracted to Russia in 91..a set of buffer states were created..roughly a distance between Berlin and minsk. As these buffer states defaulted to neutral the demilitarization produced new hope. Russia itself still existed with 17 odd Sq km...
The Cuban missile crisis revealed in full view to the world how ridiculous u.s.a stance is on international affairs. By u.s logic ...Kennedys blockade was totally illegal and should have been rammed. By u.s logic...mercenaries can travel to Iraq March 03 ...
Spc.. Your responses appreciated. But the real question is how do 3rd parties React to invasions not involving them. The un was set up to solve diplomatically Nato... https://www.nytimes.com/1997/02/05/opinion/a-fateful-error.html https://en.m.wikipedia....
Some good responses SPC. But the overall points I made are not addressed. A) I just used oil as a substitute for grain in The article...the point being that the invaders (u.s.a) weren't put in that position because precisely and ironically the war was ...
The article makes some interesting points about inflation..just the blatant russiaphobia displayed is highly disturbing. Many "claims" are just speculation. a ) I don't remember usa doing a deal with iraq govt owned oil companies to "keep supplying" ...
GEE..how naughty of an editor to change a pro-Washington slanted bias article masquerading as journalism. By printing the reverse narrative...simply proves how difficult it is to find any objective print.
That is the point precisely.. Of course I don't Condone putin invasion..just like I didn't bushes. The point is...when Bush invaded I Didn't support weapons to saddam. By your logic..u support weapons to saddam to escalate =quagmire war The World minus 4 ...
Giving weapons to zelensky is to kill russians is the right thing to do.....according to you.. thus giving weapons to saddam to kill Americans is right and just by your logic.
Oh I get it..so punish countries impersonating US and nato behaviour?
Oh..you mean like Bush saying "mission accomplished" on May 1 2003..where he can then steal trillions in oil. Your not addressing the question....Neutrality is the default. .what justification for intervention? By your own logic..china russia and Iran give...
Interesting take on a complicated and largely, actually FULLY..NOTHING TO DO WITH US..situation.. so...why are we picking sides would be a good question...and somewhat staggeringly...why is neutrality regarded as some kind of dirty word in the mass media. ...
Deescalation happens by arming the Iraqis and driving the Americans out
I made a claim...so need to back it up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons I also found a gem to example the use of questioning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeWHviwLMy8 so why is mccain in ukraine with asov? who is enemy?...
I've been reading quite a few of the comments u.s.n.a.t.o sending weapons to ukraine. Nato and the United States didn't have to get involved in this conflict at all. The fact is as of feb 24 2022..ukraine was not in nato. When USA invaded Iraq, did China ...
The United States of Amnesia launched a totally illegal war in Iraq in 2003. The Reasons were false and erroneous. The majority of nations denounced the invasion....as they had prior to its launch. Where was the global outrage then? There were worldwide ...
Ian mac, those standards were done away with by the then Mont Peleron society member Ruth Richardson. Now we are 30 years down the track and the ideology of paying less than a living amount to beneficiaries is a normality...
Stuff have closed the comments section below that story by Garner, i cant even see the comments that were already posted. Why do that?
Agreed the Nats are going more Orwellian by the day. Those rights of gang members will be the first on a slippery slope including anyone the Nats don't like including left wings activists. Do they want to devide to the point of civil war???
Just one thing I noticed on the reduce unemployment to 4%. The statement does not say they will accurately count Unemployment by changing the methodology the stats department use.
+100
so true. They are masters in the art of dirty politics...
That was really good.
freddo frog i like it...
So true the Natz must be following the same methods as the conservatives in the Uk. Lies damn lies and stats...
I agree Ianmac. We need big change in this country. Fairness needs to prevail with progressive ideas.
yes the National party are currently hiding this issue before ths election. But i don't think they can hide it very well. When i am around Wellington during the day you can see the homeless everywhere. It is obvious its just the MSM just are not focusing ...
Must be good if the power brokers dislike it. I say bring it on...
Recent Comments