I'm not interested in debating Sandy Hook's validity, just the trial procedure and the effect of the case. What is interesting about Fetzer vs Posner is that in the trial according to a journalist present, Posner's lawyers: 1. Never attempted to prove a ...
But what constitutes a mundane prorogation versus I suppose a substantive prorogation? The politics of the Judiciary. That and that alone. What else can it be? It is judges now who decide if a prorogation is politically permissible. And as DS says, the ...
You don't understand the constitution. The issue isn't whether Boris was wrong to have prorogued Parliament. The issue was the matter is for parliament to decide. It is not a matter for the Courts. They have used circular arguments. Proroguing Parliament ...
You're exactly right of course. Parliamentary sovereignty over the prerogative powers is in it's ability to modify them via statute. In paragraph 44 of the judgement, all examples given of constraining prorogation are statutes - and it's a very limited ...
Recent Comments