Agreed, Adrian. I can only repeat what I said on here during the negotiations: we all know Winston's going to be the same Winston (that much is undeniable, whether you like him or not). So Luxon had to choose between having a support party, where he could ...
I've provided plenty of relevant information on an important topic. Your response each time is "But ME, I got reckons!". No supporting evidence. I'm happy to debate, but you're not interested. Over and out.
For you maybe, but not the majority of National voters. Again, read. And they've only got 38%, so alienating many of those voters for no gain is not smart. You'll work it out eventually, if/when McKee tries to get ACT's unpopular policy into law.
See the links provided. If you voted National, you voted for their policies.
But it's not simply swinging Nat to Lab and back to Nat. The new government is set to move so far that it will pursue policies that National voters do not support and did not vote for. Example: guns. McKee is the new Minister, and she opposes all 3: public...
Of course they will. People on the left need to get smarter about this. The tactic (imported from USA Republicans) is to provoke a response from the people National want to respond. We could call it Hone Harawira syndrome. John Key's government would do ...
You and SPC have summed it up. National knew that if they said "tax cuts" loud and often, it would work. And it did. They could have said they were going to pay for it by making banknotes smaller, it wouldn't have mattered. A magical treasure was needed so...
The funding for St John's ambulances has been covered extensively in the media. How it was: Paramedics, St John want more funding | RNZ News How it is: St John offers biggest pay correction in the history of the ambulance service Less funding under the ...
Thank you for your reply. I'm sorry that you have had some very unpleasant experiences. The question then is "Will that improve now? Can these promises be believed?". The evidence is clear. I'll take just one example for now, policing levels. First, this ...
Can you give us examples of how you, as a citizen, have been discriminated against? Can you tell us how you have suffered, in reality? And can you tell us how the new government is going to stop that? And since you say "6 years", not "3 years", why are you...
Luxon's popularity with his own supporters has peaked already ... the real estate crowd are getting stuck in: "inept negotiator" Real estate agents criticise Luxon’s foreign buyer U-turn: ‘We’ve blown it’, All things property, under OneRoof
No, I doubt anybody voted National because they believed Luxon was going to make tackling climate change a priority. It was barely mentioned in the campaign.
"The only saving grace in these coalition agreements is that so much is couched in weasel words ("consider", "business case", etc). A lot of it will never happen." In 2017 the Nats' line of attack on Ardern was "working groups!". There was some truth to it...
"Reduce Core Crown expenditure as a proportion of the overall economy." That's not surprising, it's what anyone would expect from right-leaning governments anywhere. But ... It is then followed by a list of plans, at least 25 of which involve spending more...
It's not a "witch hunt". Income tax cuts were a cornerstone of National's campaign, with Luxon repeating "$250" until the CTU exposed his dishonesty and the media belatedly reported it. And prior to that, he spelled it out with no ambiguity. Not "here's a ...
Perhaps the Standard could compile an ongoing list of election promises broken by the Nats and their sidekicks? It will soon be a long one, to be constantly updated. This should include all such examples, regardless of whether you think the U-turn is ...
Anyone who seriously believes we'll be getting "strong stable government" should read this. The government doesn't even exist yet (that's Monday) but today we couldn't even get through a strong stable press conference ... Analysis: The coalition ...
Well, it's happening already. Nats leaking to reporters about their new BFFs. National reportedly 'deeply frustrated' deal not signed today (1news.co.nz) Never mind "ink not yet dry". Ink hasn't even been used yet. Public niceties, private leaks and back-...
This isn't going to be a National-led government.
It's a tactic. Keep talking (and saying nothing) to prevent a follow-up question. The reporters are often as culpable as Luxon. He would have to answer more substantially if they just waited while a colleague maintains one line of questioning ("You've said...
MPs are not there because thanks to your hero Luxon's incompetence, Parliament cannot now sit until Dec 5. Surprising that you did not know that.
So we will get a government on Monday. Not before. Tomorrow we get a handshake photo op, but it has no legal status to form a government. Nobody will be sworn in. Unless the Governor-General is otherwise occupied all day tomorrow, only Luxon's negotiating ...
So Jack, are you going to be visiting next year to tell us how well it's going? Or will you disappear and re-emerge with a new handle when the inevitable meltdown happens? You've got what you wanted, please stick around to defend it (obviously you won't, ...
Announcement last week today called off: Live: No hope of a government coalition deal being announced on Thursday | Stuff.co.nz This may be why: "On the question of whether he could share the deputy prime minister role with Seymour, Peters hit back calling...
It's now clear (if anyone doubted it) that Luxon has been dishonest once more. He said days ago that policies had been "closed down and agreed". Policy matters settled with parties: Luxon | Otago Daily Times Online News (odt.co.nz) If that is true, then ...
And Parliament won't now meet until Dec 5.
Not amateur interference, only preparing for the opposition's questions over the next 3 years (if it even lasts that long). He has summed it up accurately. "Does the PM from Party X agree with his Cabinet Minister Y or his Cabinet Minister Z"? No ...
Awesome! Today Luxon (again) said it was because of MMP. Tell that to Bolger, Clark, Key, English, Ardern. It's been 27 years.
He just can't help himself ... Today: Coalition talks: ‘Couple’ of issues still to be resolved | Nov 22 2023 | The Spinoff Nov 19: Luxon emerges from talks with Peters, says only three outstanding issues remain (newstalkzb.co.nz) Nov 16: Coalition talks in...
Nicola Willis has now ruled herself out as Deputy PM. It's clear that she (and others in caucus no doubt) is going to play the long game. National MPs are not blind to the obvious, they know Luxon is not up to the job, and of course they will not say so ...
It is National's explicit policy to cut benefits, including for disabled people, as demonstrated here: Election 2023: Christopher Luxon grilled by AM's Ryan Bridge on whether beneficiaries will be better off under National or Labour | Newshub (of course we...
Recent Comments