Best example?
You get two votes, mate.
Fair enough, it probably doesn't help to rag on him just when he's perking up either. I should have said, he definitely won the debate side, not convinced about the 'talent show' aspect. Anyway, I'm in the minority, thank goodness.
He also thinks that the end of China as a functioning nation will be this decade, according to several other of his vids.
I'm not trying to 'start something' but if these things are to be judged like talent shows, that's how he came across to me. It's the case with these 'presidential' debates. Their likeability is under the microscope. I don't give a shit about how they look...
I wouldn't give it to Hipkins so quickly. It's say he bolstered spirits, but wouldn't have necessarily gained a heap of undecideds. His high voice made him seem a little whiny at times too, sad that's that's even an issue these days. Luxon was surprisingly...
Totally agree and here's why we need them: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/498850/election-2023-labour-s-fiscal-plan-looks-to-reduce-government-spending-maintain-income-tax-settings Just who the hell are they trying to please?
Extremist policies, not party, is what was stated. And to mix and mingle with extremists to then pander to them, I think the E word is justified here. As Patricia says, dogs and fleas and all that.
I don't think the opinions you state are incompatible with left wing. We've created a world of such hyper-individualism that kids are being told they can just be whatever they want just by saying so; and legions of online networks, clinics and metaverses ...
So you’ll be voting further left than TLP? Great, same. TPM and GP are good options.
That would be true if it were just Labour doing the clamouring. But it isn't is it.
The lowest of the low brow humor used to say that as a joke. Man: "I think I might be lesbian too!" etc. Unfunny then, but now we're supposed to take it seriously, it's absurd.
Here's a question. Is there a level of arm-twisting by powerful foreign states? Anecdotal, but a friend in the 80s was at a LP do and got a moment with Lange. He said that Lange told him that a US envoy of some kind had told him that there was a limit to ...
Yes. They are knaves, not fools. They have no problem lying for what they see as a 'greater good'. Same with ACT and NZF. It's a real shame it's like this, I reckon most people hate it. Imagine if we were given proper, informed choices.
Of course he will. The only reason he's been delaying is that now the others can say a vote for Nat is a vote for Winston.
I seem to remember No Right Turn calling him a "jack-booted fascist" at one time. Pretty harsh! But I always got a bit of a right-leaning vibe from him (like I did from Stuart Nash).
Well then I guess that tweet is right, it is dangerous. Seems to be scaffolding, but if you'd said it was bomb tubes and mini mortars (or something) I probably would have believed you, since I don't know what they look like.
Nup. Tamatha has WC in the bag. Couldn't give a fuck about that idiot Greg O'Connor, in fact I hope he gets bumped. He's in the wrong party.
Come on, we're not all in the military. What's that picture? To me it just looks like a whole load of scaffolding.
I think crybabies needs to be there too.
Yes
Well I saw him at warehouse stationery the other day, printing out a whole lot of... something! So maybe he's not missing, but regrouping!
Can you post the text here? That link just takes me to a Blue Sky login...? (Another thing to sign up for)
I'd agree with that. God knows what my LinkedIn says at the moment! It's sloppy, but James is not so idiotic as to try to trick anyone, why bother? The others are technicalities, as are some of Luxon's above.
Point taken, but those are pretty lame examples, you must admit.
Oh, and here's an interesting analysis on the actual words used by each speaker: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/498497/how-david-seymour-and-winston-peters-hogged-the-mic-in-the-minor-party-leaders-debate
Here's the video of the Newshub Power Brokers debate, fyi: https://www.youtube.com/live/db6k68wgwHA?si=Efx1NfrEivbvqMht
Well of course, but the creep factor is what is worrying. How long till they're just put up outside? What's the effect on wildlife, public health? Anyway, there is no device that works on people under 14 only, but that's fine, ban everyone under 25?
Wow, I thought it had been banned. It's worse that I thought then.
Creative solutions maybe, but not the dreaded Mosquito. This pernicious device uses sound as a weapon against those young enough to hear it. It effectively makes being young a punishable crime in certain areas. It was so abused in the UK that it had to be ...
Surely Chippy and the LAB know all this. They aren’t completely clueless. Is it too much of a stretch to wonder if Labour would rather a NAT government got in than have to share power with the Greens or TMP? NAT and LAB are both centrists after all.
Recent Comments