I agree it is, but it's hard to tell from your link what you are meaning specifically. Can you please give two actual examples?
quick glance at that and it seems an improvement. Last time I looked at a NZ resource it was basically saying that detrans people are the ones who the evil terfs have convinced aren't trans and if they just had better support they wouldn't want to ...
minefield seems a good descriptor at this point.
mod note.
I don't know either, but I hear rumours that detrans services aren't available and that ACC won't cover detransitioners. My point here is that detrans people exist. We know that some of them have huge regret for the lifelong disabilities they now live with...
feel free to link to specific examples and then we can look at them in context. I've moved this to OM because you just made an unsubstantiated claim. The onus is on you to support what you are saying. As you well know.
can you point me to NZ healthcare services for detrans people? are detrans people covered by ACC for their injuries?
I tend to agree about the difference. Also, one person's violent language is water off a duck's back to another, so without specifying, none of us know what the other means. One recent example, I wouldn't call this violent, but it is nasty, was some of ...
that avoids responding to Joe's point.
I'd prefer that "for as long as possible" wasn't extended to 'forever', but bans can creep, and morph – in all directions. Watch out Kansas. NZ is unlikely to follow US politics imo, and more likely to follow the UK. Because of the structure of our legal ...
No – would those accounts be consistent with my belief that "on balance, it's better to delay/withhold most/all irreversible [gender-affirming] interventions for as long as possible"? I don't know, but I would be interested to know. My point here is that ...
I'm not going to spend time dragging this out of you. If you want to ask questions, then ask them directly. If you want to make ambiguous statements, then do it in OM.
If you want to run slur politics and imply that GC people are akin climate deniers, do it in OM. If you have something to actually add to the debate, then you can come back to the post with well made arguments and evidence, but it should be obvious by now ...
Roblogic was supporting us GCFs (and his own GC position) long before you were on the scene. Settle down eh, and maybe have a conversation without accusation.
indeed.
but Cohen is a Jewish name?
Still think that, on balance, it's better to delay/withhold most/all irreversible interventions for as long as possible, but some youngsters seem to know their own minds, and can be quite determined – as it was, and ever will be. one of the truly great ...
...". I don't know if weka was correct in their claim; ...
that was one of the more risible parts of PATHA's response. The Cass review was for NHS England. It took into account international research, but it's purpose was UK focused. But imagine if drugs and surgeries in other areas of medicine were being ...
I said it sounded reasonable. Are you expecting me to abandon my opinion after just one claim from you? No. If I were merely making a claim I would expect people to scroll on by. Instead, I spent a five days reading the various commentaries on the Cass ...
where are you doing the clicking? Front page?
apparently that MSM has form, so he probably has a good case.
I deleted a couple of comments that someone reposted in another post. It takes a while for the site to update (or your cache).
A bunch of racist, reactionary, inflammatory dickheads who appear incontinent spread the rumour that the Bondi Junction killer was this man. Worse, a major MSM outlet repeated the lie without fact checking or waiting for confirmation from the police. Ben ...
my preference is for Cass review discussion to go under the post. I included that link in the post itself for a reason as well as putting the NZ resources at the end. This is likely to be a high volume debate on TS, so it's good to put comments under posts...
like I said to Phil yesterday, I have some sympathy for people trying to get their head around this complex situation. Hard this late in the game. But at some point the ignorance becomes wilful. You've been in these debates for some time, this isn't an ...
you literally just said that PATHA's position sounded reasonable, and I pointed out they told a blatant lie, and you want to equivocate with me over trust? It's not early. We have been talking about this on TS for years, and the debate has been raging ...
It’s shocking to see such a significant inquiry into transgender health completely disregard the voices of transgender experts. It would be like reviewing women’s health with no women, or Māori health with no Māori involved. Oh, you mean like that time ...
it's a blatant lie. From the Cass Review website, In spring 2023 the Review commissioned six support and advocacy organisations to facilitate a series of focus groups with former, current and potential future service users to understand their experiences ...
Written By: weka - Date published: 9:56 am, April 15th, 2024 - 137 comments
Categories: child welfare, health
Tags: cass review, child gender transition, gender dysphoria, gender identity, GIDS, medical scandal, tavistock
Last Wednesday, Dr Hilary Cass, a British paediatric physician and researcher who specialises in disability, released the final report in the Cass Review. The Cass Review, formally known as the Independent Review of Gender Identity Services for Children …
not as an excuse but as context, in the US there is significant culture in medicine around avoiding legal liability by overtreating or treating along specific pathways. In socialised medicine countries I think this still happens but more along the lines of...
Recent Comments