You didn't bother reading. Or didn'understand? A "strike" is a collective withdrawal of Labour. If a Telecoms "contractor" individually refused to work it is a breach of contract. Illegal. If they all clubbed together and refused to work asking for more ...
It was, effectively, a strike. I am fully aware that he was a contractor. Individually he could refuse contracts that didn't suit him. However! "Colluding" with other contractors is nowadays illegal. As is getting unconnected employees to strike in support...
significant social, economic and cultural reasons for their high levels of happiness. Such as Unions right to strikes, effect on equality and social welfare, access to education and opportunity? Noting that Parnells contractors work to rule, for an 8 hour...
In NZ it is illegal to strike for any other reason than the negotiation of an expired employment contract. And only the workers directly involved can strike. Supposedly, you can also strike for safety reasons. An infringement on human rights, to withdraw ...
Illegal. Unlike civilised countries. Finland Strikes. Though note the new right wing Government wants to place limits on the right to strike. Strikes, as a non violent political protest, should have remained legal in any society which pretends to be ...
Meanwhile. More civilised countries still have the right to strike.
National and the Reserve Bank have been talking the country into a recession for at least a year. And real business confidence, as reflected by investment in plant and staff, not the perceptions held by the delusional, in the near future is non existent, ...
Auckland exists, because of the port.
How to say in several different ways, that you haven't a bloody clue about shipping. Don't know where you got 3% from, but that is total rubbish. After the Kaikoura earthquake Lytelton/Auckland shipping took the freight that road and rail could not.
That is what really incensed the, laughably called "centre right" . The country had an example of the effectiveness of Government putting people first, ahead of 'their' profits. A people working together for good, instead of for the increased wealth of ...
Things such as upgrading schools and infrastructure, road safety improvements to name just a few. Keeping everyone in jobs during and after COVID. Wasted? You really want to see waste. Just hold my beer, for the next three years. Watch the recession, ...
You have no bloody idea. Coastal shipping pays it's own way, including paying the artificial profit levels imposed on infrastructure/ports. Roads are not expected to make a profit. Also Ports have a requirement to make an additional artificial opportunity ...
We live in a mirror image of a Robin Hood society, one in which resources are indeed being redistributed, not downward, from rich to poor, as Robin Hood was reputed to do, but upward, from poor to rich," Case and Deaton argued.
Extremely foolish. Given the need for more, not less, environmentally and economically more efficient coastal shipping. Privatisation of ports, puts shipping at even more of a disadvantage compared to heavily subsidised trucking. While there is a case for ...
I love right wing tragics when they are being satirical.
Yep. Went after Meteria was dumped. Funny that.
Meteria went there with the full agreement of the party hierarchy. In fact Greens went up in the polls after that. So. The idea that she disadvantaged the party is debatable.
Unfortunately. A work around is needed.
No problem. Not the first time a debate has hinged on semantics, not disagreement. Something people who want to slant polling are also well aware of. I often struggle on here with the need to write for many people's different backgrounds and training, with...
Objections to tax on a primary residence for capital gains can be removed by putting a floor on it. Even my National voting business mates, agree Key should have been taxed on his 10 million property windfall in Auckland. They don't agree the average house...
Meteria was following Green party principles. The fact that some in the party threw her under the bus was not a good look. Golriz was clear mental health issues. I would be sympathetic to anyone in that case regardless of party. I didn't join the ...
In fact, if you are, for example, a builder in the business of building houses and you build a "spec house" or renovate a house, whether you live in it or not, you are liable for tax on total earnings from the sale. Less expenses of course. That is treated...
The "purpose of raising the loan" is to make a tax free capital gain on sale of the property. Land prices are too high to make rentals a viable ongoing business. And force many more people into renting. Paying the landlords mortgage. This, of course, has ...
Even Adam Smith, the guru of capitalism, argued that unearned income, such as land rents, should be taxed rather than work income. Your position isn't even logical. And definitely economically counter productive. In NZ with the current tax settings, we are...
Department of PM and Cabinet responds amid feud between David Seymour and Government-funded centre director over 'death cult' comments | Newshub Te Whatu Ora chair Rob Campbell sacked | RNZ Very obvious how NACT view "free speech". Only allowed for their ...
I see a whole flight of pink pigs here. Don't worry. If the Coalition of economic incoherence sees any sign of house prices or rents decreasing, they will, like Key, open the immigration tap some more to ensure they stay high. Got to look after the ...
Yet another example of what ACT really thinks about 'Free speech", to go with the reaction to Fiona Kidman and Rob Campbell. Newshub
My point is that if land speculators expect tax deductability of interest, then capital gains tax should be on the corresponding income, consequent increase in wealth. That would be consistent with other forms of income.
https://theconversation.com/nzs-housing-market-drives-inequality-why-not-just-tax-houses-like-any-other-income-208003
Not correct. For a productive business to be worth more over time, generally value has to be added to it. Land appreciates just by existing, currently, as the result of speculation and rent. Look up" the chain across the river". Sunday Essay: The chain ...
The difference is, with machinery, if you depreciate it and then sell it for more than the depreciated book value, you have to cough up tax on the difference. Remembering it when people sell big stationary Tanner power tooling that actually appreciates. ...
Recent Comments