Solving the Housing Crisis – Facts or Ideology?

Written By: - Date published: 10:09 am, January 26th, 2015 - 63 comments
Categories: Economy, monetary policy - Tags:

The scale of the housing affordability crisis, particularly in Auckland, is now unmistakable. Not only do individual families suffer as home ownership increasingly moves beyond their reach, but the impact on social cohesion and on the fair distribution of resources is becoming more and more damaging.

The rising cost of buying a house is without doubt the most powerful driver of inequality in our country. Those who already own their own homes can watch the rise and rise in house prices with equanimity – even satisfaction. They can comfort themselves with the knowledge that the increased price they would have to pay for a new house will be offset by the rise in value of their existing house and that, in the meantime, their wealth will – at least on paper – grow week by week without any effort of their own.

Those who are not property-owners, however, can only watch helplessly as the inexorable rise in house prices leaves them further and further behind. They would feel an even greater sense of despair if they realised that, because the rate of increase in house prices far exceeds any percentage growth in national wealth, it does not represent real resources, and can therefore only come from a net transfer of wealth from non-home-owners in favour of those who own their own homes.

Little wonder, then, that our policy-makers have at last been forced to confront the issue. Sadly, though, their response reflects political and ideological preoccupations, rather than the real reasons for the crisis.

The government has seized the chance to offer yet another goodie to their friends in business. The Resource Management Act has long been a serious bugbear for property developers. Life would be so much simpler for them if they did not have to worry about environmental issues and the interests of neighbours. The government has duly obliged. The growth in house prices, they discover, is all the fault of the RMA and, for good measure, of local government bureaucracy, and they have promised action to discipline both of these supposed culprits.

This diagnosis is also consistent with the government’s ideological preferences. The housing market in Auckland is obviously misbehaving. Since the market is, according to neo-classical economics, by definition infallible, its malfunctioning must be the result of “rigidities” that must be removed so as to allow supply to rise to meet demand.

But this is completely to ignore the fact that the housing market is not like any other market. Not only do houses maintain their value as units of accommodation over a long period of time, but in what other market is it possible for those on ordinary incomes to meet the purchase price by borrowing many times their annual income? And where else do the lenders meet any increase in the purchase price by simply offering to lend more?

And since we have now had confirmation from the Bank of England that bank lending on mortgage is created out of nothing (and that the notion that banks lend only what others lend to them is entirely false), we can now begin to see where the pressures for asset inflation in the housing market really come from.

Bank credit-creation for the purposes of lending on mortgage is in fact the single greatest factor in increasing the money supply and is therefore the source of the most significant inflationary pressure in our economy. And since it is not matched in any way by a corresponding growth in real resources, it is not surprising that it manifests itself as asset inflation (or rapidly rising house prices) in the very market into which it is almost entirely directed.

The most reliable statistics for bank lending on mortgage go back only as far 1998. In the period 1998 to 2014, the value of such lending rose fourfold, from $52 billion to $196 billion. Can we be surprised that Auckland house prices have risen over that same period at the same rate – that is, they are now four times higher than in 1998.

The Auckland housing market, in other words, is a function of the cumulative effects of that $196 billion of new bank-created money. Where else could it have gone? And the herd mentality that is typical of markets means that rising asset values attract speculators and investors seeking capital gains, thereby making the problem worse.

The Auckland housing market survives at its present level only for as long as the banks will go on lending. Each rise in prices in the Auckland housing market requires more lending to sustain it. Each new loan helps to create a new price structure which then provides the basis for yet more lending. But if, as some are beginning to realise, the bubble should burst, it is not just the housing market but the banks themselves that would be at risk.

To its credit, our own Reserve Bank is one of the few central banks to begin to perceive the truth about the housing market – hence its initial and timid attempt through tighter loan-to-value ratios to restrain bank lending for housing purposes.

There may well be measures – not just in housing but in areas such as transport – that could usefully be adopted to better align supply and demand in the Auckland housing market. But until the ideologues understand what is really driving the upwards price spiral, there is no real solution in sight.

Bryan Gould

26 January 2015

 

63 comments on “Solving the Housing Crisis – Facts or Ideology? ”

  1. philj 1

    The high cost of building materials seems to have been parked by this Government. Apparently, RMA is the problem! If only it was so straight forward. Our building material costs ( timber,concrete etc ) are way higher than Oz or USA. The supliers, Placemakers, Carters, M10 etc. have the market sown up.

    • Draco T Bastard 1.1

      I think you’ll find that there’s less suppliers than that. In fact, I’m pretty sure it’s close to a duopoly of Fletchers and Carters.

      • Tracey 1.1.1

        placemakers is the retail seperation for fletchers to the market to reduce their liability in negligence but still flog their product with impugnity.

    • aerobubble 1.2

      A depleted market requires forced systems to function efficiently.
      A sustainable market, providing its own functions, on tap, ready,
      is a abundant market. Neoliberals want depleted markets, and
      then they want gobernment to butt out, so leaving the monopolistic
      market we have today. Government can force the market back to
      efficiency temporarily to cover over the exploitative avarice gone
      awry, but until governments set up to create abundance true
      fre markets and freedom for citizens will never appear.
      We live at the behest of global elites, a global elite shrinking in
      number fast, u til only a few will rule us like the Maya elite,
      cannibalizing everything to stay in power. You see thats what
      fascism is, it takes the resources of the state and cannibalizes
      society, first they target the outliers, then the opposition, then
      they come for you. Germany was destroyed by the nazis.

      • aerobubble 1.2.1

        Take media, a depleted media environment needed government financial support to make up for the lack of a internet, then government created the abundant market we see today, not the private sector. Much of the disruptive innovation today is directly linked to the government creation of the internet. Abundance produces free markets. You see neolibs dont finish the sentence, they say government should get out of the the way of a free market, yes! by creating, imposing govt, not by reducing and shrinking government. Good government naturally becomes small. Bad government shrinks and leaves a hoepless mess of monopolistic and elitist practices. Take jounralism, journalist still want to work with big media, instead of growing local markets and disrupting the big dinosaurs.

        The US is not a free society, liberty for a price is not liberty. The US doesnot believe in freedom, when a citizen cant get cheap health care, where serfdom is the price of housing, where the food is so crap that any free person could not hold a piece of junk food in one hand and say the US is a free country and not look like the moron they are.
        Freedom is abundance, the US was free society.

  2. saveNZ 2

    Agree with most of the article. The RMA is a not just a smokescreen but actually is being used in a particularly dirty way to claim more affordable housing by reducing ‘standards’ so they are cheaper. This will not work at all! In fact the RMA is already being used the opposite way to make it hard to challenge lazy, incompetent and poor decisions and polluters.

    Poor people can not challenge richer neighbours or corporations for their actions. The public can’t easily challenge lazy decisions like the Pohutakawa 6. In the case of the Pohutakawa 6, I agree with Transportblog,

    The second issue is that the project itself is a dog. Even if there weren’t any trees being removed, what Auckland Transport is proposing to do here it terrible, dangerous and belongs a 1960s traffic engineering handbook, rather than a redesigned intersection of the 21st century.

    As well as ridiculous outdated transport decisions, rich people are oppressing their neighbours by taking away their amenity for their gain. Houses are getting oversized and taking away affordability as yet another house is created into the multimillion dollar bracket. The idea this is for affordability is so laughable – I suggest those lefties fooled by this discourse, look around Auckland. Development is everywhere and houses are getting bigger. More costly and longer to build, more expensive to run and more expensive to rent. As soon as one enormous house breaks the price record for the street, more ordinary people decide to try some amateur speculation and create another McMansion. The whole character of an area is being changed and families locked out.

    Feel you can save some $$ from not doing geo tech reports, due diligence, hiring a registered architect when you build a house? No problem – you can already. Leaky building is well behind the National government and they are ready to relax those standards and guidelines once more. (In fact they never changed but they are encouraging the council to throw away guidelines yet again to look busy, not to mention all the secret deals between council and barristers over the ages). By the way this is now, so I hate to think how much more relaxing their possibly could be?

    So just looking at the above we are facing a throw back to the 1960’s transport with leaky buildings, and Spec houses for an unknown investor. And that’s just in Auckland, think about the pristine environment about to be destroyed under Simple Smith’s reforms.

    The RMA should be STRENGTHENED to increase standards of living and amenity, not weakened. The council needs to be held more to account for the terrible standards they have allowed in Auckland and are now encouraging to be weakened further to created ghettos between rich and poor.

    • Draco T Bastard 2.1

      The RMA is a not just a smokescreen but actually is being used in a particularly dirty way to claim more affordable housing by reducing ‘standards’ so they are cheaper. This will not work at all!

      No it won’t. Or, to be more precise, what we’ll get is maybe slightly cheaper housing (Nothing worth mentioning and probably not there at all) and higher ongoing living costs. The higher ongoing living costs do, of course, boost the profits for the rich over any possible savings in house prices.

      The RMA should be STRENGTHENED to increase standards of living and amenity, not weakened.

      The government should be setting standards that are difficult to meet because that forces R&D and innovation. Setting the standards low means that everything can keep going with outdated and inefficient standards while profits can get boosted because no R&D or innovation is needed.

  3. aaron 3

    The middle class needs to change it’s attitude to family wealth: It used to be the kids were told not to squabble over the family wealth and to fend for themselves but I’ve told my mother not to waste her money because her grand children are going to need it if they’re ever going to own their own home.

    Of course the retirement-industrial complex has risen up to relieve the baby boomers of their wealth as they live out their last years in style and luxury but if you talk to people from old wealthy families (or read their thoughts on the internet which is how I did it 🙂 they’ll say their wealth belongs to the family and that they’re expected to maintain it for future generations.

    How we got to the point where the middle class fritter away their money with reverse mortgages so that they can continue to keep up with the Jones’s is anybody’s guess. Of course they’ll say they earned it but the reason they did so well is because of the previous generation and it’s social spending programs. It’s not for nothing that that generation is known as the Builders.

    Generation X and Y should known as the Busted Generations – as in: Build, Boom, Bust.

  4. Foreign waka 4

    It is a misconception that those who “own” a home, or shall we say mortgage are happy with these ballooning values. Far from it! One reason is the ever increasing costs such as council rates and the other any increase in interest rates to hold the explosive boom. Both affect the average person tremendously and bites big time in their day to day living costs. I don’t even want to mention pensioners who are often asset rich and cash poor. The first expenditure to go is costs relating to health, which in turn creates another issue. That of chronic illness that is avoidable if not in the predicament as above.
    What an envy society we have. “If I have nothing neither will you” kind a thing. What really needs to be looked at are businesses such as these- article in the NZ Herald. Web: business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11391731

    Farms are being sold at the cheapest prices anywhere in the world, we are talking about food producing Agra land. What is wrong with the people of this country, do they not see the forest for the trees?

    • One Anonymous Bloke 4.1

      🙄

      “The people are crying out for affordable housing!”

      “Why don’t they just buy farms?”

      • Foreign Waka 4.1.1

        This is an ignorant and mischievous reply. And may I point out not worthy of having a conversation about one of the major issues facing this country.

        • One Anonymous Bloke 4.1.1.1

          Ok, not my best work.

          I don’t think we’ll tackle the housing crisis without tackling the wages crisis, and we won’t tackle the wages crisis until workers have more bargaining power.

          • Foreign waka 4.1.1.1.1

            All good, just feel a bit touchy when people with very little are not getting their fair share. Yes, wages are definitely an issue, to solve this needs some good and honest people on the top. When did NZ have had this experience last? I personally always held Mr Cullen in very high regard.

        • Westiechick 4.1.1.2

          I voted to fix this. It was a Labour policy called Kiwibuild. Affordable housing built in bulk by the Government because developers won’t (why should they?). Will be voting for it again in 2017 and hoping more will be with me.

          • ghostwhowalksnz 4.1.1.2.1

            Its not the housing thats a problem , its the land prices.

            Trouble is the speculators will by hook or by crook get hold of the houses within a few years.

            Whatever happened to covenants, they are still around to make sure expensive houses are built on the land.

            Why cant they put in a covenant to say owner occupiers only.
            Ive heard the Cornwall park Trust only allows owner occupiers, but thats a different class of property

    • Lanthanide 4.2

      “Far from it! One reason is the ever increasing costs such as council rates ”

      Council rates are set for the year ahead and then this is divided out across the households in the city. The mechanism to apportion the rates depends on your house value – but if all houses are rising in value at the same rate, there will be no difference in the amount of rates you pay.

      For example, say the council needs to raise $50M in rates and there are 10 houses in the city, and each house is valued at $100k. Each house would have to pay $5M in rates for that year.

      Then next year, the rates stay at $50M but the houses have all increased in value from $100k to $200k. Still the rates required is $50M, and the number of houses haven’t changed (even though they have all doubled in value), so the rates stays the same at $5M each.

      The causes of rates increases are:
      1. The council needs more money to operate, due to inflation, debt payments and new works. This is by far the largest aspect of rates increases.
      2. Your house has gone up proportionally more in value than others have, so you pay a proportionally higher share of the total rates bill than you otherwise would have. The converse is true however – if your house has risen less in value than the average, you’ll pay a smaller share of the rates than you would have.

      • Foreign Waka 4.2.1

        As far as I am being made aware through the Council City notices, rates are based on house and land values. If they increase, so do the rates. This may or may not be the best method. But I also understand that there are voices asking for the actual work done and planned, costs calculated and then shared. Mind you under the democratic process there wont be any Convention centers or extraordinary high salaries that the ordinary punter will never, ever see in their life time. Let alone any expansion on the theme by implementing a “super city” concept.

        • One Anonymous Bloke 4.2.1.1

          Lanth is right. Council sets a budget and levies rates to meet it.

          Last year, Stuff reported that 118,000 Auckland households got a rates decrease.

          • Foreign waka 4.2.1.1.1

            “Rates are based on your property’s capital value, land use and whether it receives targeted rates, a rates remission or is non-rateable”

            “Your rates are based on a valuation of the property you own. If you disagree with your valuation, you may be able to lodge an objection”

            In Millions:
            Arts and cultural activities total $ 86.36
            Building and development control total
            $ 64.41
            City promotions and business
            support total $ 31.46

            Community support total $ 184.63 (Mostly library’s, no housing)
            Conservation attractions total $ 42.03
            Gardens, beaches and green
            open spaces total $ 195.32
            Māori and Mana Whenua
            partnerships total $ 1.64
            Public health and safety total $ 56.09

            Recreation promotion and
            support total
            $ 183.46 (most for swimming pools)
            Transport total $ 203.31 (hahahahahahaha)
            Urban planning, heritage and
            public spaces development total $ 52.75
            Waste reduction and energy
            conservation total $ 3.28
            Wastewater total $ 352.93
            Water total $ 434.69
            Storm water total $ 313.03

            City Council webpage, services/rates-and-property/rates/rates-explained/how-rates-are-calculated

            There are a lot of water charges, how many times are administration double ups?

            So the total cost of this is 2.3 bil. netted out to rate payers but farms, commercial landholdings pumping water out of the ground will have a far lower bill due to waste water not being a factor. Considering that farming is polluting the rivers an affront to anyone. Not to mention the none rateable areas….
            In any case – surprise! it is the working people who have to foot the bill.

            • Foreign waka 4.2.1.1.1.1

              This is Wellington Council – Auckland must be a different nightmare.

            • One Anonymous Bloke 4.2.1.1.1.2

              Your assertion ( If they increase, so do the rates.) is that rates inflation matches house price inflation. It doesn’t, unless those 118,000 houses decreased in value.

              • Foreign waka

                So how do you explain an increase of an average of 3% each year and the notice inexplicably states that this is linked on property values? And no matter what my income it certainly will never increase at that level. So from my perspective, it does look like it. Considering that the wider Wellington region wants to go “Super City” – this will lead to the same issue Auckland faces, an affordability crisis. How many city council staff can a region afford? And why does the person paying has those peoples hands in their pocket for more?
                This is just another way to create jobs for mates.

                • One Anonymous Bloke

                  So Council’s budget has increased by ~3% a year. That could easily be explained by a combination of:

                  1. Inflation.
                  2. Population growth.

                  What has the annual property market inflation been?

                  • Foreign Waka

                    Value Decreased by 0.7%, Rates increased by 5% in my particular case for the year ending June 2014.

                    Council statement:

                    Please note that the information shown below refers to the September 2013 revaluation which is current as at today’s date until the next revaluation which takes place in September 2016. The new property values won’t be used to assess the rates until 2014/2015. Even then, a decrease in the value of your property won’t automatically mean a reduced rates bill. The key factor will be whether your property value has increased more than the average, or less than the average.

                    Yes, we are being taken to the cleaners no doubt about it.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      So, which one of the factors I mentioned do you think is wrong? Do you accept that population growth and inflation impact on Auckland’s budget at all?

                    • Foreign waka

                      to OAB, either you purposely overlook the essence of my argument or you actually did not seem to look for a conversation but rather a case argument for the council.
                      1/I have shown you a case for the Wellington area
                      2/Auckland has now the super council and has to be content to pay super rates. Yes, inflation plays a role, and no they don’t need to pursue every pet project there is.
                      Increased population and housing should at a certain expansion degree actually decrease costs as the assets rise and the supply of services are hooked onto existing systems.

                      Are you employed by the council? It would explain your defense to get the general public to pay, pay, pay. Just to make sure that the wages can rise, rise rise.

                      Since you removed the reply button, it could be the case but alas I don’t know. Just surprised that a left leaning forum pleads for more charges to be dished out.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      I am not now, nor have I ever been, employed in the public sector.

                      All I’m saying is that any Council’s costs increase on an annual basis due to population growth (if any) and inflation. Sure there are economies of scale, and you have to spend more money to get them.

                      You cited an 3% growth in the rates take (if this isn’t the essence of your argument please help), which seems to me could be due to those factors. It certainly might also be driven by extravagance, You’ve failed to show that though.

                      I think it’s… odd that you agree that wages need to go up then rail at wages going up.

                      People on a fixed income are often eligible for rates rebates. Sometimes elders are too proud to claim them. This is fertile ground for vague grumbling.

                  • I live in Auckland, out west.

                    In the last 3 years my house’s CV (upon which my rates are calculated) increased by 37%.

                    In the last 3 years my rates have increased about 7% or 8% (in total).

                    Lanth is correct when he (or she, I’m not sure) asserted: “Council rates are set for the year ahead and then this is divided out across the households in the city. The mechanism to apportion the rates depends on your house value – but if all houses are rising in value at the same rate, there will be no difference in the amount of rates you pay.

                    Also, I used to work for one of the contractors involved in billing and of ARC rates and the calculations did not change when the super city was created.

                    • Molly

                      “Also, I used to work for one of the contractors involved in billing and of ARC rates and the calculations did not change when the super city was created.”

                      IIRC, all the district rates calculations stayed as they were for the first term of the newly created Auckland Council. About three years ago, all these different rates schemes were brought into alignment. Every Auckland ratepayer, should now be under the same rate calculation now.

    • Murray Rawshark 4.3

      Here’s the full link: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11391731

      It gives me the shits when I see the selling off of the country presented as investment. If it’s investment in anything, it’s in banking profits.

  5. Murray Simmonds 5

    “Bank credit-creation for the purposes of lending on mortgage is in fact the single greatest factor in increasing the money supply and is therefore the source of the most significant inflationary pressure in our economy. ”

    Congratulations. You have discovered what was published in the Article “Banking vs Democracy” first published in February 2012 by Andrew Jackson and Ben Dyson.

    https://www.positivemoney.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Banking_Vs_Democracy_Web.pdf

    I still maintain its a very significant article that should be on the reading list of anyone who is serious about economic change.

    • Tracey 5.1

      funny how if you propose creating money to solve a cou trys economic problems you get called a looney. banks have been creating money that didnt exist to facilitate private wealth accumulation and that is BRILLIANT. apparently.

    • Colonial Rawshark 5.2

      Bryan Gould has scored a direct hit here, talking directly at last about the creation of money ‘out of thin air’ via the supply of bank credit to consumers and home buyers.

    • ghostwhowalksnz 5.3

      If the banks have ‘created the money’, why would they have bank depositors, term deposits and they also borrow on overseas or local money markets ( 90 day etc)

      Can you explain whey would a domestic bank borrow money ( and pay interest) when you say they ‘create it’

      You cant of course explain it. The truth is the bank makes money on the difference between what it pays in interest ( short term) and what it receives in interest ( long term)

  6. Grim 6

    Double all wages, half the exchange rate, impose a tariff of 100% on all exports excluding the wage component. Then adjust the measure of inflation (CPI) to include a housing component.

    solved.

    Implemented correctly the only change is the ratio of wages to resources and fixed assets in the local economy, exports remain affordable internationally, raw resources don’t suddenly become cheap international, but do internally.

    Services will become more expensive vs materials, which is how it was back when things were good.

    The drive to a low wage economy is and has always been the issue. slaves and masters.

    • Colonial Rawshark 6.1

      It’s customary to slap a tariff on other countries imports into NZ, not a tariff on our own exports out of NZ…?

  7. Colonial Rawshark 7

    It seems bleeding obvious, but as usual none of our political parties have got the guts to say it: you can’t fit 1/3 of the country’s population on 0.3% of the land area, and not have fucked up, unsustainable, expensive consequences.

    Just saying.

    • Sacha 7.1

      Just ask Singapore. Density pays if the economy is geared for high-value enterprises.

      Of course if we’re not confident enough to back ourselves, let’s double down on suburban sprawl, growing milk powder and casual McJobs serving tourists for foreign owners.

      Which future?

      • Colonial Rawshark 7.1.1

        Singapore believes in a strong, gutsy, centrally directed economy willing to invest big money where its mouth is. Their politicians and bureaucrats never swallowed the neoliberal pill like NZ did.

        • Tracey 7.1.1.1

          and no one is poor or poorly paid…

          • Mike S 7.1.1.1.1

            And it doesn’t have the highest rate of inequality amongst developed nations and it doesn’t have the highest proportion of poor people amongst developed nations or a poverty rate of 26% and climbing fast. Nor does it have the lowest (by a long way) government spending as % of GDP of all developed nations…..

            Yea, Singapore is great…

  8. Karen 8

    A few ideas:
    1. Build many thousands of new state houses and allow people to get a state loan to buy them when their circumstances allow. Replace each one that is sold.
    2. Instigate Labour’s Kiwibuild policy.
    3. Improve tenancy rights for rentals so that landlords cannot sell the property unoccupied if there are sitting tenants.
    4. Make landords responsible for ensuring rentals are well insulated and maintained
    5. Do not allow non-residents to buy houses.
    6. Investigate the cost of building materials to find out why these cost so much more than in Australia, UK or USA.

  9. Saarbo 9

    Maybe someone can help me,

    If this is the case:

    And since we have now had confirmation from the Bank of England that bank lending on mortgage is created out of nothing

    then I cant understand how this can happen:

    But if, as some are beginning to realise, the bubble should burst, it is not just the housing market but the banks themselves that would be at risk.

    Because if the money is created from nothing, then a bubble burst wont actually hurt the bank, even if it cant recoup its loans, because there is no such thing as depositors doing a run on the money.

    Where is my thinking going wrong?

    Excellent post by the way!

    • mikesh 9.1

      If a borrower doesn’t repay his loan then he has, in effect, gained at someone else’s expense. That someone can only be the bank.

  10. disturbed 10

    CRS said brilliantly,

    “Bryan Gould has scored a direct hit here, talking directly at last about the creation of money ‘out of thin air’ via the supply of bank credit to consumers and home buyers.”

    Yes a paper thin economy that will crumble when the market value gets unbearable and the global commodity market sinks again.

    No Productivity generation so pop goes the economy.
    Happens about every 7-8 yrs.’ or so cycle.

    In Toronto in 1985 the market heated up and house prices rose markedly then in 1991 I saw when it hit there same as Auckland then 1992 and a big bang happened as house slid as prices went down over 30% in a year, and a third of the Toronto housing was put up for mortgagee sales.

    It will happen here. 1992, 2001, 2008, 2015-16.

    • Colonial Rawshark 10.1

      Chances are in 2017, the election campaign will be run in a year where NZ is in significant economic distress. Will Labour have a true alternative vision for the nation, or just variations on the neoclassical framework.

      • Descendant Of Sssmith 10.1.1

        Will Labour have a true alternative vision for the nation,

        No.

        or just variations on the neoclassical framework.

        yes

  11. Jenny Kirk 11

    Good article by Bryan Gould, but he’s left out a significant factor in the Auckland housing market – that is, the buy-up of residential homes by non-NZers using cheap overseas finance. See this story about Chinese people getting ready to target the NZ (Auckland) housing market in today’s Herald.
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11391731

    • Colonial Rawshark 11.1

      Yes indeed, in the case of foreigners it is cheap foreign bank credit pushing money into the NZ real estate system instead of NZ (Australian) bank credit.

    • Herodotus 11.2

      If there are overseas people purchasing properties, then they are trading in property, so tax should be paid on all profits. But unfortunately the ird have not been seen to be proactive in this area. Should the legislation be either ambiguous or the courts interpretation display short comings in it, them IMO the ird should test this out in court, and if they fail report back to their minister ( p.dunn) as to why they failed and what charges are required.
      To change investor behaviour IMO one of 2 these need to be acted on. Be proactive and manage the amount of debt that is a result of property investment or reactive and with the use of taxation make property investment undesirable. For offshore investors the use of taxation as a disincentive eg stamp duty( non deductible expense ) + tax profits.

      • mikesh 11.2.1

        “If there are overseas people purchasing properties, then they are trading in property,”

        Not necessarily. They may be purchasing to let; or even to live in themselves.

  12. Visubversaviper 12

    Anybody who wants to see the actual effect of Asian investment in the Auckland Property market should take a Sunday drive to Albany and visit Golden Morning Drive. The very name is a “dog whistle” to Asian buyers, the houses are all the same sort of design, and most have 5/6 bedrooms and the same number of bathrooms. They all maximise the building envelope, except where a developer buys 2/3 sites and signs off all the inter-boundary infringements. They are crammed onto 500/600m2 of land and do not have a single square centimetre more green space than they are required to have. You get the impression that left alone, they would concrete up the whole site. I hate to think what it will be like in 20 years.

    • One Anonymous Bloke 12.1

      I don’t like your racist tripe; it isn’t so much subversive as hateful and demeaning.

      Speaking of dogwhistles, what country is “Asia”?

    • Tracey 12.2

      you are describing the raison d’etre of developers (most of whom are white in my experience) not the purchasers

  13. Chooky 13

    too much immigration…too much foreign buy up….too much depleting of State housing stocks…..this is an artificially created scarcity by John Key Nact and mates…..and it creates higher prices ….. New Zealanders are the losers

    • vto 13.1

      But how can we be losers? We now have even bigger mortgages – isn’t that a good thing that indicates how rich we are?

  14. ghostwhowalksnz 14

    We could have a ‘land tax’ on non resident landowners of residential land ( or earmarked for residential)

    The sale of housing could be more clearly bought under the tax system. There should be a period that is clearly defined to cover fast sale for speculation. At least 18 months with a few exemptions, otherwise the increase is taxed at normal market rates

    Often houses are bought and sold quickly by real estate agents who can use their skills to pay under market value to older owners who arent aware how fast the market moves. A quick $50 grand can be made for a sharp operator ( tax free if they are careful)

  15. Grim 15

    ****if your wages increase by 2% and house prices increase by 5%******

    Any “solutions” discussed above that don’t address this are worthless.

    The opposition have framed the debate, if you continue to look for solutions within that framework at best you may find a temporary fix, but more than likely just a new layer of regulation that those in positions of power will be able to exploit at the expense of the less fortunate.

  16. les 16

    Colin Craigs ‘use it or lose it’ policy toward developers sitting on land had merit.It certainly needs alot more than tweaking the RMA to address this problem of house prices.The govts feeble no reliable data available re foreign purchasers is ludicrous.

  17. MrSmith 17

    We can only hope that the next time the banks find themselves going cap in hand to the government for a guarantee, the government of the day have the backbone to nationalise the lot of them.

    And on another subject, it never ceases to amaze me that radionz continue to go to the banks economists for comment on the state of the economy, talk about asking the lunatic’s running the asylum how things are going!

  18. linda 18

    new Zealand is heading for a melt down in housing market the current path is so unsustainable as to be a bad joke that is destroying our communities and causing massive indebtedness with all associated social costs bring on the crash because we need one !

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • EV road user charges bill passes
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed the passing of legislation to move light electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) into the road user charges system from 1 April.  “It was always intended that EVs and PHEVs would be exempt from road user charges until they reached two ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Bill targets illegal, unregulated fishing in international waters
    New Zealand is strengthening its ability to combat illegal fishing outside its domestic waters and beef up regulation for its own commercial fishers in international waters through a Bill which had its first reading in Parliament today. The Fisheries (International Fishing and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 2023 sets out stronger ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Reserve Bank appointments
    Economists Carl Hansen and Professor Prasanna Gai have been appointed to the Reserve Bank Monetary Policy Committee, Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced today. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is the independent decision-making body that sets the Official Cash Rate which determines interest rates.  Carl Hansen, the executive director of Capital ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Stronger protections for apartment owners
    Apartment owners and buyers will soon have greater protections as further changes to the law on unit titles come into effect, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “The Unit Titles (Strengthening Body Corporate Governance and Other Matters) Amendment Act had already introduced some changes in December 2022 and May 2023, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Travel focused on traditional partners and Middle East
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters will travel to Egypt and Europe from this weekend.    “This travel will focus on a range of New Zealand’s traditional diplomatic and security partnerships while enabling broad engagement on the urgent situation in Gaza,” Mr Peters says.   Mr Peters will attend the NATO Foreign ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Keep safe on our roads this Easter
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown is encouraging all road users to stay safe, plan their journeys ahead of time, and be patient with other drivers while travelling around this Easter long weekend. “Road safety is a responsibility we all share, and with increased traffic on our roads expected this Easter we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Cost of living support for over 1.4 million Kiwis
    About 1.4 million New Zealanders will receive cost of living relief through increased government assistance from April 1 909,000 pensioners get a boost to Superannuation, including 5000 veterans 371,000 working-age beneficiaries will get higher payments 45,000 students will see an increase in their allowance Over a quarter of New Zealanders ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Tenancy reviews for social housing restart
    Ensuring social housing is being provided to those with the greatest needs is front of mind as the Government restarts social housing tenancy reviews, Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka says. “Our relentless focus on building a strong economy is to ensure we can deliver better public services such as social ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary plan halted
    The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary will not go ahead, with Cabinet deciding to stop work on the proposed reserve and remove the Bill that would have established it from Parliament’s order paper. “The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary Bill would have created a 620,000 sq km economic no-go zone,” Oceans and Fisheries Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Cutting all that dam red tape
    Dam safety regulations are being amended so that smaller dams won’t be subject to excessive compliance costs, Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on reducing costs and removing unnecessary red tape so we can get the economy back on track.  “Dam safety regulations ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Drought support extended to parts of North Island
    The coalition Government is expanding the medium-scale adverse event classification to parts of the North Island as dry weather conditions persist, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced today. “I have made the decision to expand the medium-scale adverse event classification already in place for parts of the South Island to also cover the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Passage of major tax bill welcomed
    The passing of legislation giving effect to coalition Government tax commitments has been welcomed by Finance Minister Nicola Willis.  “The Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill will help place New Zealand on a more secure economic footing, improve outcomes for New Zealanders, and make our tax system ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Lifting economy through science, tertiary sectors
    Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Judith Collins and Tertiary Education and Skills Minister Penny Simmonds today announced plans to transform our science and university sectors to boost the economy. Two advisory groups, chaired by Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, will advise the Government on how these sectors can play a greater ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government announces Budget priorities
    The Budget will deliver urgently-needed tax relief to hard-working New Zealanders while putting the government’s finances back on a sustainable track, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says.  The Finance Minister made the comments at the release of the Budget Policy Statement setting out the Government’s Budget objectives. “The coalition Government intends ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government to consider accommodation solution
    The coalition Government will look at options to address a zoning issue that limits how much financial support Queenstown residents can get for accommodation. Cabinet has agreed on a response to the Petitions Committee, which had recommended the geographic information MSD uses to determine how much accommodation supplement can be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government approves extension to Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care
    Cabinet has agreed to a short extension to the final reporting timeframe for the Royal Commission into Abuse in Care from 28 March 2024 to 26 June 2024, Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden says.                                         “The Royal Commission wrote to me on 16 February 2024, requesting that I consider an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • $18m boost for Kiwis travelling to health treatment
    The coalition Government is delivering an $18 million boost to New Zealanders needing to travel for specialist health treatment, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says.   “These changes are long overdue – the National Travel Assistance (NTA) scheme saw its last increase to mileage and accommodation rates way back in 2009.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • PM’s Prizes for Space to showcase sector’s talent
    The Government is recognising the innovative and rising talent in New Zealand’s growing space sector, with the Prime Minister and Space Minister Judith Collins announcing the new Prime Minister’s Prizes for Space today. “New Zealand has a growing reputation as a high-value partner for space missions and research. I am ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Concerns conveyed to China over cyber activity
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed New Zealand’s concerns about cyber activity have been conveyed directly to the Chinese Government.     “The Prime Minister and Minister Collins have expressed concerns today about malicious cyber activity, attributed to groups sponsored by the Chinese Government, targeting democratic institutions in both New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Independent Reviewers appointed for School Property Inquiry
    Independent Reviewers appointed for School Property Inquiry Education Minister Erica Stanford today announced the appointment of three independent reviewers to lead the Ministerial Inquiry into the Ministry of Education’s School Property Function.  The Inquiry will be led by former Minister of Foreign Affairs Murray McCully. “There is a clear need ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Brynderwyns open for Easter
    State Highway 1 across the Brynderwyns will be open for Easter weekend, with work currently underway to ensure the resilience of this critical route being paused for Easter Weekend to allow holiday makers to travel north, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Today I visited the Brynderwyn Hills construction site, where ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Speech to the Infrastructure Funding & Financing Conference
    Introduction Good morning to you all, and thanks for having me bright and early today. I am absolutely delighted to be the Minister for Infrastructure alongside the Minister of Housing and Resource Management Reform. I know the Prime Minister sees the three roles as closely connected and he wants me ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Parliamentary network breached by the PRC
    New Zealand stands with the United Kingdom in its condemnation of People’s Republic of China (PRC) state-backed malicious cyber activity impacting its Electoral Commission and targeting Members of the UK Parliament. “The use of cyber-enabled espionage operations to interfere with democratic institutions and processes anywhere is unacceptable,” Minister Responsible for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • NZ to provide support for Solomon Islands election
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Defence Minister Judith Collins today announced New Zealand will provide logistics support for the upcoming Solomon Islands election. “We’re sending a team of New Zealand Defence Force personnel and two NH90 helicopters to provide logistics support for the election on 17 April, at the request ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • NZ-EU FTA gains Royal Assent for 1 May entry to force
    The European Union Free Trade Agreement Legislation Amendment Bill received Royal Assent today, completing the process for New Zealand’s ratification of its free trade agreement with the European Union.    “I am pleased to announce that today, in a small ceremony at the Beehive, New Zealand notified the European Union ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • COVID-19 inquiry attracts 11,000 submissions
    Public consultation on the terms of reference for the Royal Commission into COVID-19 Lessons has concluded, Internal Affairs Minister Hon Brooke van Velden says.  “I have been advised that there were over 11,000 submissions made through the Royal Commission’s online consultation portal.” Expanding the scope of the Royal Commission of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Families to receive up to $75 a week help with ECE fees
    Hardworking families are set to benefit from a new credit to help them meet their early childcare education (ECE) costs, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. From 1 July, parents and caregivers of young children will be supported to manage the rising cost of living with a partial reimbursement of their ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Unlocking a sustainable, low-emissions future
    A specialised Independent Technical Advisory Group (ITAG) tasked with preparing and publishing independent non-binding advice on the design of a "green" (sustainable finance) taxonomy rulebook is being established, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says.  “Comprising experts and market participants, the ITAG's primary goal is to deliver comprehensive recommendations to the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Chief of Army thanked for his service
    Defence Minister Judith Collins has thanked the Chief of Army, Major General John Boswell, DSD, for his service as he leaves the Army after 40 years. “I would like to thank Major General Boswell for his contribution to the Army and the wider New Zealand Defence Force, undertaking many different ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Minister to meet Australian counterparts and Manufacturing Industry Leaders
    25 March 2024 Minister to meet Australian counterparts and Manufacturing Industry Leaders Small Business, Manufacturing, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly will travel to Australia for a series of bi-lateral meetings and manufacturing visits. During the visit, Minister Bayly will meet with his Australian counterparts, Senator Tim Ayres, Ed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government commits nearly $3 million for period products in schools
    Government commits almost $3 million for period products in schools The Coalition Government has committed $2.9 million to ensure intermediate and secondary schools continue providing period products to those who need them, Minister of Education Erica Stanford announced today. “This is an issue of dignity and ensuring young women don’t ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech – Making it easier to build.
    Good morning, it’s great to be here.   First, I would like to acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of Building Surveyors and thank you for the opportunity to be here this morning.  I would like to use this opportunity to outline the Government’s ambitious plan and what we hope to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Pacific youth to shine from boost to Polyfest
    Minister for Pacific Peoples Dr Shane Reti has announced the Government’s commitment to the Auckland Secondary Schools Māori and Pacific Islands Cultural Festival, more commonly known as Polyfest. “The Ministry for Pacific Peoples is a longtime supporter of Polyfest and, as it celebrates 49 years in 2024, I’m proud to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • 2024 Ngarimu VC and 28th (Māori) Battalion Memorial Scholarships announced
    ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech to Breast Cancer Foundation – Insights Conference
    Before moving onto the substance of today’s address, I want to recognise the very significant and ongoing contribution the Breast Cancer Foundation makes to support the lives of New Zealand women and their families living with breast cancer. I very much enjoy working with you. I also want to recognise ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Kiwi research soars to International Space Station
    New Zealand has notched up a first with the launch of University of Canterbury research to the International Space Station, Science, Innovation and Technology and Space Minister Judith Collins says. The hardware, developed by Dr Sarah Kessans, is designed to operate autonomously in orbit, allowing scientists on Earth to study ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech to the New Zealand Planning Institute
    Introduction Thank you for inviting me to speak with you today and I’m sorry I can’t be there in person. Yesterday I started in Wellington for Breakfast TV, spoke to a property conference in Auckland, and finished the day speaking to local government in Christchurch, so it would have been ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Support for Northland emergency response centre
    The Coalition Government is contributing more than $1 million to support the establishment of an emergency multi-agency coordination centre in Northland. Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell announced the contribution today during a visit of the Whangārei site where the facility will be constructed.  “Northland has faced a number ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Celebrating 20 years of Whakaata Māori
    New Zealanders have enjoyed a broader range of voices telling the story of Aotearoa thanks to the creation of Whakaata Māori 20 years ago, says Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka. The minister spoke at a celebration marking the national indigenous media organisation’s 20th anniversary at their studio in Auckland on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Some commercial fishery catch limits increased
    Commercial catch limits for some fisheries have been increased following a review showing stocks are healthy and abundant, Ocean and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The changes, along with some other catch limit changes and management settings, begin coming into effect from 1 April 2024. "Regular biannual reviews of fish ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-03-29T14:45:25+00:00