web analytics

Strategic voting

Written By: - Date published: 6:44 am, October 20th, 2014 - 196 comments
Categories: election 2014, election 2017 - Tags:

A detailed analysis of voting patterns in the election is now out, and no doubt there will be plenty of analysis and discussion coming up. The Herald this morning notes some obvious points:

Nats’ strategic voting vital for Act

Nearly two-thirds of National supporters voted for the Act Party’s David Seymour in Epsom, newly released election data shows, while Labour and Greens supporters were not as willing to vote strategically in the crucial electorate. …

The data showed 60 per cent of people who voted for National in the electorate also backed the Act candidate. In comparison, just 31 per cent of Labour supporters and 45 per cent of Green supporters appeared to have voted strategically by backing the National candidate.

There is no ACT party as such, just a political zombie animated by National’s “cup of tea” strategic voters and public money. In 2017 Labour and the Greens must clearly signal to their Epsom voters that it is time for them to vote strategically to put an end to it. (Patrick Gower will frenzy himself with righteous indignation at “dirty deals”, but no one else will blink an eye).

In Ohariu, 59 per cent of National supporters backed Mr Dunne, even more than in 2011. Even with National’s help, Mr Dunne only retained the seat with one of the smallest margins in the country.

Yup, time to have a chat to Left voters in Ohariu too.

It’s all very well taking the moral high ground on strategic voting, but the nice guys are finishing last. Enough already, time for the Left to use the same tactics as the Nats (on voting that is, they can keep their dirty politics).

196 comments on “Strategic voting ”

  1. Draco T Bastard 1

    Enough already, time for the Left to use the same tactics as the Nats (on voting that is, they can keep their dirty politics).

    Exactly and when the RWNJs come out with accusations that we’re being hypocritical we say that we’re playing the way the game is played. Playing any other way is losing.

    Then we change the rules once we have power to make the RWNJs play style illegal citing just how corrupt it is.

    • TheContrarian 1.1

      So you’ll make the activity you just engaged in to gain power illegal because it is corrupt?

      Is that what you are suggesting?

      • Draco T Bastard 1.1.1

        Yes.

        Reason: Because playing nicely while the other team isn’t is a recipe for getting screwed.

        • TheContrarian 1.1.1.1

          Very little integrity in that.

          Draco – 4 days ago:
          “Yep, the next left government needs to start making these things that National that are wrong but not illegal actually illegal so that we can hold the fuckers to account.”

          I hope you’ll also be holding yourself account since you are, hypothetically, making an action committed by the left illegal.

          • blue leopard 1.1.1.1.1

            I disagree @The Contrarian,

            Your logic is odd. Changing election strategy in order to get into power, so one can change unjust laws/rules is not lacking in integrity.

            It is an intelligent way to discourage a culture of ignoring the ‘spirit of the law’ (or in this case rules) and to stop making it easy for parties who are happy to take this attitude toward rules from getting elected into government in future.

            • TheContrarian 1.1.1.1.1.1

              “Your logic is odd. Changing election strategy in order to get into power, so one can change unjust laws/rules is not lacking in integrity. ”

              Yeah but you are changing election strategy into one you are openly admitting is unjust.

              As I said, which Draco agreed, you’ll make the activity you just engaged in to gain power illegal because it is corrupt. This means you are openly engaging in behaviour you KNOW to be corrupt.

              • blue leopard

                “Yeah but you are changing election strategy into one you are openly admitting is unjust.”

                It is even more unjust to act in a manner that allows it to continue.

                This means you are openly engaging in behaviour you KNOW to be corrupt.

                I have commented about the corrupt aspect of this behaviour elsewhere on this thread.

                Comment 14.1.1.3

                Comment 14.1.1.1.2

                In short, following a ‘corrupt’ practice in order to gain power to stop the corrupt practice [by changing the rules] is the lesser questionable practice than acting in a manner that allows the ‘corruption’ to carry on for longer.

                • TheContrarian

                  As long as your comfortable with your level of corruption (Draco’s words – not mine) in relation to others then go nuts – have a good time.

                  • blue leopard

                    If you are quoting Draco, please provide a link because I can’t see that he said that in this conversation. I hope you aren’t misrepresenting him.

                    Oh and in future, I suggest that you own what you are saying rather than implying it is someone else that is saying it or if it is really not your belief, then you should leave it for that other person to say it. It is much simpler that way.

                    • TheContrarian

                      Reread Draco’s comments, particularity this exchange”

                      “So you’ll make the activity you just engaged in to gain power illegal because it is corrupt? ”
                      D: “Yes.”

                      And here:
                      “Then we change the rules once we have power to make the RWNJs play style illegal citing just how corrupt it is.”

                      Pretty crystal clear.

                      You yourself:
                      “In short, following a ‘corrupt’ practice in order to gain power to stop the corrupt practice [by changing the rules] is the lesser questionable practice than acting in a manner that allows the ‘corruption’ to carry on for longer.”

                      And again:
                      “I think technically it can correctly be called corrupt because it is a corruption of the original purpose of the rule…”

                      You both admit it is a corrupt practice you’ll be willing to engage in yourselves in in order to gain power. Oh yeah, but then it will be illegal because, hey, it’s corrupt after all.

                      So yeah, that lacks integrity

                    • blue leopard

                      Do you think that voting in a manner that gets the party you want in is lacking in integrity?

                      You are highlighting the awkward situation that the left is in with regard to strategic voting, however are not acknowledging the extenuating factors which I have cited regarding why I think we should vote this way given the circumstances and intentions.

                      My quote was ‘technically’ the technique is corrupt – as in a corruption of the initial purpose of the rule, however I have also commented that it is on the edge to call it corrupt.

                      I would have the rule changed so that this type of voting wasn’t required but have also discovered today that the rule I thought would fix it wouldn’t.

                      I don’t think it is hideously lacking in integrity to vote in this manner particularly when the the other side is doing it – seems a bit stupid not to under those circumstances and if there is the intention to address the rules so they are not so convoluted. If you think otherwise, so be it.

  2. Manuka - Ancient Order of Rawsharks 2

    The Herald article does not show the breakdown of votes for TTT. Here is the Election Results link: http://www.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2014/electorate-69.html

    There were fewer than 800 votes difference between Hone and Mr Davis. (After 950 were discarded ..)

    1,938 voters were National.
    3,296 were NZF.
    Both those parties were directed by their leaders to hang their hats on Davis.
    (And Labour knew in advance, at least with National, that such would be the case.)

    • Colonial Rawshark 2.1

      Wow, the other parties really ganged up to screw Hone over. And the NZ underclass got screwed along with that.

      • karol 2.1.1

        And that’s the risk if the left starts strongly promoting strategic voting – the right out strategising them.

        At the very least, those promoting a left strategic vote would need to be sure the right couldn’t just gang up on them in response. I think that would have been possible in Ohariu, for instance. So promoting left strategic voting there would probably just be a wasted effort.

        • boldsirbrian 2.1.1.1

          That’s a good point karol

        • phillip ure 2.1.1.2

          @ karol..all the greens had to do..was not stand a candidate…

          ..nothing to do with ‘ganging-up’..

        • The Lone Haranguer 2.1.1.3

          “The right outstrategise them”

          Thats their job Karol, and its the lefts job to come up with workable and winnable strategies to beat them.

          Sadly, the left spends way more time eating their own, than working on strategies so that they can go dining on those of the right.

          The fight for the direction of the Labour party, has taken precedence over being an effective opposition at this time. Meanwhile the Nats are out doing their stuff knowing the best and brightest in Labour are focused on a leadership battle.

      • Manuka - Ancient Order of Rawsharks 2.1.2

        Reply to Colonial.
        And, according to that Herald article, the votes against Hone came from Auckland. Auckland has way less in common with the North, especially the far North, than Sydney does with Auckland. So how about we have Sydney, eg, determining who represents Auckland then.

        WHO is representing the Mana of the North? Oh yeah, the big mining and real estate reps, Anadarko and the big oil seekers ready to swamp the pristine coastline, the frackers and the drillers, the internationalists, the overseas “investors” in this beautiful land who are set to carve it up and remove ownership affordability from all in Aotearoa.

        Nice one Labour. Something for the History books, eh. What a great achievement for our future.

        • Colonial Rawshark 2.1.2.1

          And, according to that Herald article, the votes against Hone came from Auckland. Auckland has way less in common with the North, especially the far North, than Sydney does with Auckland.

          THIS

      • Clemgeopin 2.1.3

        Yep, they ganged up upon the only leader who was valiantly fronting the socialist principle of eliminating poverty.

        Had Labour supported Hone and courageously welcomed IMP as a potential coalition partner, most likely there would have been a Labour led government today.

        An election that has gone so wrong.

        • Kiwiri - Raided of the Last Shark 2.1.3.1

          And just yesterday on Q&A, Parker and Robertson have said that Labour should have ruled out IMP earlier.

          That really shows Parker’s and Robertson’s values, aye?

          • Manuka - Ancient Order of Rawsharks 2.1.3.1.1

            As long as they repeat that, they are playing Nats game, dancing to Nats tune.

            • Murray Rawshark 2.1.3.1.1.1

              It’s the tune that Labour adapted from Thatcher and Friedman, back in 1984. Now they all dance to it, except Winston First and Mana. Winston First dances to the old National tune. Mana dances to an indigenous adaptation of the old Fabian tunes of Michael Joseph Savage. It’s a tune the others would like to ban.

          • wekarawshark 2.1.3.1.2

            “And just yesterday on Q&A, Parker and Robertson have said that Labour should have ruled out IMP earlier.”

            Little said it too (earlier). But refused to say what he would do if a Mana MP was going to make or break it for Labour forming govt.

            Anyone know where Mahuta stands on this?

        • Tangled_up 2.1.3.2

          Had Labour supported Hone and courageously welcomed IMP as a potential coalition partner, most likely there would have been a Labour led government today.

          Disagree. Even KDC has publicly said that his brand was poison. Labours big drop in support in the last few months was voters refusing to entertain the possibility of IMP in Govt.

          Now had KDC and the IMP not come along and then yeah, maybe MANA could have been somewhere in the mix with a left coalition.

          • Manuka - Ancient Order of Rawsharks 2.1.3.2.1

            KDC has publicly said that his brand was poison.

            On election night when he spoke briefly: “The brand ‘kim dotcom’ was poisoned. I was not aware of that.” Poisoned by an ongoing media campaign.

            Labours big drop in support in the last few months was voters refusing to entertain the possibility of IMP in Govt.

            That, right there, is big media spin.

          • phillip ure 2.1.3.2.2

            @ tangled..

            “..Labours big drop in support in the last few months was voters refusing to entertain the possibility of IMP in Govt…”

            ..that is just simplistic/factually incorrect bullshit..

          • Clemgeopin 2.1.3.2.3

            But Cunliffe and Labour DID distance themselves from KDC and IMP and said they didn’t WANT them in government. But the vote was still poor. So your theory does not stack up.

            Had Labour supported Hone and IMP, the party vote of IMP would have had a boost securing about 3 to 5 IMP MPs due to the electorate+party vote, then Nats/ACT/Dunne would not be the government running the show today.

            • Colonial Rawshark 2.1.3.2.3.1

              Cunliffe and Labour distancing themselves from Internet Mana was seen as reaching out to the comfortable middle classes while cutting off ties with the MP who put in the “Feed the Kids” bill.

              Strangely enough, this strategy did nothing to motivate Labour voters to turn out.

              TL:DR the more Labour tries to play tunes acceptable to the MSM, the more Labour will decline.

            • Tangled_up 2.1.3.2.3.2

              But Cunliffe and Labour DID distance themselves from KDC and IMP and said they didn’t WANT them in government. But the vote was still poor. So your theory does not stack up.
              Yes they tried to distance themselves; but Key and the media wouldn’t let them. A vote for Labour is a vote for Kim Dotcom was all that was needed to scare away the swing voters.

              Had Labour supported Hone and IMP, the party vote of IMP would have had a boost securing about 3 to 5 IMP MPs due to the electorate+party vote, then Nats/ACT/Dunne would not be the government running the show today.
              Well we can only speculate. Even to get just 3 MPs their party vote would have to have been more than twice what they ended up getting. That’s a massive “boost”. And also even if miraculously they more than doubled their party vote a net gain of 2 seats for the left wouldn’t have given a majority anyway.

              • blue leopard

                ” A vote for Labour is a vote for Kim Dotcom was all that was needed to scare away the swing voters.”

                I agree that was the likely belief among some (many?) but that shows a big failure of the left.

                Fact:
                >>KDC was never going to be in parliament<<

                Had the left spent more time asserting that fact and less time leaving people believing junk-lies by treating IMP like it was something to be feared and loathed, then the NZ population may have understood the facts of the matter over the spin. Perhaps?

                • Tangled_up

                  True. Though it seems that people (many?) really didn’t like KDC and with him constantly in the media/moment of truth etc I’m not sure that there’s much the left could have done to counter all this negative attention.

                  • blue leopard

                    Yes, you know, I actually do wonder the same thing myself, but it would have been really nice to have at least seen the left try to counter these memes.

                    Had they done so, we would now not be left wondering.

                    I really am getting a bit frantic over this, because we are simply ordinary folk, (I am and am assuming you are too 🙂 ), yet these people/parties we are talking about are professionals and are supposed to be experts in their field yet I am seeing great gaping holes/failures in their strategies and I really just don’t understand how this can occur.

                    They are the ones with time to work these things out.
                    They are the ones being paid to work these things out.

                    I just wonder wtf is going on? Really I do.

              • Manuka - Ancient Order of Rawsharks

                Even to get just 3 MPs their party vote would have to have been more than twice what they ended up getting.

                More people voted for IMP than voted for the Maori Party. (2 reps)
                More than twice as many voted for IMP as voted for ACT.
                More than 6x as many voted for IMP as for UF.
                (yet each of those parties have reps in the gov.)
                http://www.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2014/partystatus.html

      • 4 across 2.1.4

        maybe the electorate votes of TTT where used to elect someone more in line with the values held by the electorate. maybe the electorate didn’t want hone anymore? or are you saying the maori voters of TTT are to stupid to do anything but what a political figure tells them?

        • Manuka - Ancient Order of Rawsharks 2.1.4.1

          “Too Stupid” ?? Or the system stacked against them!

          Excerpt:
          28,000 special votes across the country were disqualified for various reasons. In Tai Tokerau alone, 1,000 Maori special votes were disqualified. Some of the reasons were:
          • People had moved address (although still in the Tai Tokerau)
          • Although they were already enrolled – they’d been cut off because they hadn’t updated their information
          • The new address people had given was not accepted
          • Although they’d voted in past elections, there was no record of their enrolment
          • If they’d been in prison, they’d been removed from the roll
          And we have recently learned that some of these problems have been around since Matiu Rata left Labour to form Mana Motuhake back in 1979!
          http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1410/S00113/positive-result-from-recount.htm

          • SHG 2.1.4.1.1

            Summary: the votes of stupid lazy people don’t count. Everyone wins.

            • Manuka - Ancient Order of Rawsharks 2.1.4.1.1.1

              SHG: ” the votes of stupid lazy people don’t count.”

              Only if you equate “stupid lazy people” with being Maori, in TTT anyway. Some of the problems encountered, from that same link above:

              “polling booths without Maori roll voting papers;
              Maori people being turned away because their name wasn’t on the roll;
              Maori people being turned away because they didn’t have their ‘easy vote’ card;
              Maori people being told they can’t cast a special vote;
              Maori people being told they can’t vote at certain polling booths;
              Maori people being told to wait while Pakeha voters were served first;
              Maori people being told they have to travel more than 40kms to vote;
              Maori people not being offered assistance to vote;
              and Maori people having their identity questioned because of their many names.”

              • SHG

                That link is to a press release by Hone Harawira. Thus I take everything in it with a grain of salt.

                • Manuka - Ancient Order of Rawsharks

                  Hone first raised the question of these voting problems after the 2008 election. They were still there in 2011. He laid a formal complaint. The Minister responsible for the Electoral Commission seems to have shown the same respect for that formal complaint as you have for the press release, as the same problems were/ are there in this year’s election. (The Minister responsible at the time was Ms Collins, I believe.)

                  • blue leopard

                    +1 Manuka

                    I was wondering whether SHG takes as skeptical an approach toward John Key’s press releases…

                    • SHG

                      At least press releases from John Key don’t read like “waa waa waaaaaa white motherfuckers”

                    • blue leopard

                      Oh?

                      So you prefer:

                      “mmm mmm mmmmmmm I’m a white muttha-fukka suck on this lie, bitch, and if u disagree wit me u r deluded”

                    • Manuka - Ancient Order of Rawsharks

                      BL, Don’t feed the troglodytes – some of them get paid $$$s for any reactions, for successfully disrupting threads

                    • blue leopard

                      @Manuka

                      I think you’ll find that most of the comments I make to t-things are not responded to – i.e. it isn’t food.

                      I wouldn’t immediately view SHG as one, think they have been around for quite some time, but might be wrong on that.

                • Molly

                  Had a friend who was a scrutineer this election.

                  Witnessed both instances of people being redirected to another polling booth, and also being redirected to cast a Maori electorate vote.

                  Possibly more common that you have considered.

    • SHG 2.2

      You may not have noticed, but there were no National or NZF candidates on the ballot paper.

  3. The Gormless Fool formerly known as Oleolebiscuitbarrell 3

    ..and people say right wingers are stupid.

    • RedLogixFormes 3.1

      … just more willing to game the system.

      Actually this is why Antony’s call is doomed to fail. Left and right wing people value things differently. Left-wing people are not especially stupid either and most of them will have noticed that by voting for the Nat candidate in Epsom for instance would be tactically a good idea. But they don’t because it ‘feels wrong’. It violates a larger value which is that democracy is meant to be an expression of support for not just some candidate’s name – but for what they stand for.

      And for the same reason Paddy Gower would indeed have a very productive field day with the ‘dirty deal’ – because it would not be consistent with the ‘fairness and equity’ values the left stands for. People would instinctively sense it as a rank hypocrisy.

      The Nats by contrast are allowed to get away with all manner of crap – because everyone knows that’s what they stand for.

      • Colonial Rawshark 3.1.1

        Although part of it is nothing more than the anti-Left media beat up machine at work, dressed up as Paddy Gower etc finding any excuse to take the moral high ground (choke). Much of the remainder is the phenomena of Left politicians who believe that fighting dumb is somehow noble. Kill Internet Mana off. Keep the Greens at arms length. Top up Peter Dunne’s retirement accounts.

        Well this is the message for the Labour Party: one of the reasons people have stopped voting for you is because what they see out of the Labour Party is getting dumber and dumber. They see a political party where the will to win, the fighting spirit and the chance to make a real difference has been replaced by Wellngton navel gazing, poor political instincts, and a head office machine who thinks corporatisms like “Vote Positive” are a good idea.

        So what we need is “fairness and equity” armed with the ability to make every single vote count for maximum impact. Which in the course of internal union politics and internal Labour Party politics, should be a very familiar concept.

        • karol 3.1.1.1

          I disagree. Strategic voting plays into one of the narratives that turns a lot of potential voters off, resulting in political disengagement: ie treating politics as a game.

          And Lusk was pretty certain that voter disengagement turns of more potentially left than right voters.

          • Draco T Bastard 3.1.1.1.1

            If we make it clear that we’re going to change the rules after the election so that such gaming of the system can’t be done as recommended by the review that National ignored (that really needs to be highlighted) then using the same gaming will work – once.

            Then once we get into power we change the rules immediately to show that we’re serious about elections being honest. National will, of course, immediately, look for other ways to game the system.

          • Colonial Rawshark 3.1.1.1.2

            Strategic voting plays into one of the narratives that turns a lot of potential voters off, resulting in political disengagement: ie treating politics as a game.

            Hold up. Why ask Labour to stay in an FPP mindset when every other party has clearly moved on. The Labour leadership hasn’t and doesn’t support strategic voting. Yet political disengagement from Labour is occurring in droves.

            So my thesis is different to yours: its not treating voting like a game which turns voters off. It is that voters get turned off Labour when Labour fights dumb, it doesn’t fight at all, or it appears fundamentally unable to accept that we are no longer in an FPP world.

            • karol 3.1.1.1.2.1

              There’s a difference between left parties working within the MMP format in a loose alliance, and the so-called “strategic voting”.

              • Colonial Rawshark

                It’s a fundamental feature of MMP that citizens get two votes, and that those two votes can be split. In Epsom you can see that both National and Green supporters are willing to use that MMP feature far more than Labour supporters.

                If you ignore this ability to split party vote from electorate vote, then you ignore a fundamental aspect of what MMP entails at the grassroots electorate and voter level.

                • McFlock

                  Split voting is different from removing your support for the candidate you want to win and giving it to a candidate you dislike in the hope that the candidate you despise will lose.

                  The former is about preference, the latter is just a further degradation of the system.

                  And the party telling the electorate to vote for someone else is quite surreal. Leave the surrealism to the nats: they’re already in a fantasy land.

                  • blue leopard

                    What? And allow those in fantasy-land to win power?

                    No way, Jose!

                    • McFlock

                      So we must beat the surrealists by becoming surreal?

                      Where does it stop: should we have paid attack bloggers and hate-mongers panty-sniffing people we deem to be corrupt and hateful?

                    • Colonial Rawshark

                      I maintain that the electorate wants to see a Left which can play sharp, smart politics above board and within the rules, in order to win.

                      Giving Dunne a Cabinet spot far in excess of his party vote, knee capping Hone and Laila out of parliament, and pushing Seymour up into privilege again far in excess of his party vote, isn’t smart and it isn’t necessary.

                      I don’t even think there’s even any moral high ground to go with that.

                    • blue leopard

                      @ McFlock

                      Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies.

                      Your logical fallacy is the ‘slippery slope’.

                    • McFlock

                      Nothing too much to dispute there, CV( “CV-R”? 🙂 ).

                      But if the electorate decides that the Left parties instructing their supporters to anti-vote isn’t completely and unequivocably “above board”, you and I both know that Steven Joyce will be arguing moral equivalence with Seymour and Dunne’s pay-offs, with the full cooperation and support of the MSM. KDC/IMP all over again.

                      Which seems a bit much for two electorate seats that depend on a knife-edge result for their overhang to mean a thing.

                    • Colonial Rawshark

                      CV-R, oooh sounds like a new advanced model of Colonial Viper 😈

                    • McFlock

                      BL, you might think it’s a logical fallacy, but it’s a perfectly valid concern. I’m not bringing up an extreme hypothetical, and I’ve sure brought up a number of other points against the Left parties adopting anti-voting tactics.

                      You’re supporting the idea that the left copy one of the tories’ many dodgy tactics, simply because it might stop the other side winning.

                      Why that one and no other?

                    • blue leopard

                      I have made it perfectly clear what the end is, work toward the end and that is that. There is really no reason why it should lead on to more copy-cat behaviour of National’s trashiest behaviour, particularly when there is a clear aim to achieve.

                      The other stuff (two-tier strategy) shows a far more obvious case for damage to the left because it goes much more against core principles of the left than voting for a candidate that you might not ordinarily vote for, in order to get the party in that you consider more principled, does.

                      p.s It is a logical fallacy, not simply ‘me thinking it is’.

                      p.s.s.I do acknowledge it is a concern worth noting, though 🙂

                      p.s.s.s think I’ll start using CV-R for CR

                    • McFlock

                      There is really no reason why it should lead on to more copy-cat behaviour of National’s trashiest behaviour, particularly when there is a clear aim to achieve.

                      Quite simply, because the justification is that they are successful, we are not, therefore, we should copy them.
                      So when (as these things come to pass) we are not successful, the next impulse is to have another iteration of that pattern. Especially if we get elected, change the rules, and then lose when the tories invent another way to abuse the system.

                      Seriously, as soon as we cross the threshhold of the ends justifying the means, it becomes like the One ring – very difficult to put down, and the more it’s used the more it sucks from you.

                      The other stuff (two-tier strategy) shows a far more obvious case for damage to the left because it goes much more against core principles of the left than voting for a candidate that you might not ordinarily vote for, in order to get the party in that you consider more principled, does.

                      At this perspective it is much more against core principles.

                      After an election or two where both sides have been blatantly gaming the system? Maybe not so much. Especially when tory tactics adapt to deal with it.

                    • blue leopard

                      @McFlock,

                      It is not an inevitable course of action that the continuation of copying would occur, at all, because once the aim has been achieved there is no need to keep copying, and as I already said, it is one thing to copy something that barely can even be considered corrupt, and it is another to copy something that is obviously that way.

                      I think CV-R got it correct somewhere else on this thread – something about it being like the left have been characterising this business of electorate votes as corrupt for their own purposes, it has failed to have the desired effect and now it has boxed them into an untenable position where they look like hypocrites if they start doing it themselves. (Hope i haven’t misrepresented what CV said, apologies to CV if I have).

                    • McFlock

                      no, it’s not inevitable.

                      And that’s what people have told themselves in every slippery slope in history.

                      We disagree as to whether anti-voting is a corrupt practise.
                      But even by the description you attribute to CV (and ISTR somethign similar), the fact is that the Left parties have indeed left themselves in a position that they will be tarred as blatant hypocrites for at least the 2017 election.

                      As I said, KDC/IMP all over again.

                      So even if the principled stand was an electoral error, because it was taken in the first place abandoning it would be another electoral error.

          • Olwyn 3.1.1.1.3

            I think there is a difference between gaming the system and showing a real hunger to win. It would have been easy for Labour to say, with one voice, “IMP is a new party still to earn its stripes and will not be a part of our government. However, we respect their desire to represent our poorest citizens, and if they get in under their own steam, we will welcome their support for C & S, and look at implementing their ‘feed the kids’ program.”

            What we got instead was a group of Labour contenders treating IMP as a greater threat than National. This makes Labour look as if its willingness to win is conditional on approval from the right: an attitude that is the diametric opposite of Roosevelt’s bold “They hate me and I welcome their hatred.” Which of course alienates people who would normally vote for them, and brings relief to people who would never vote for them. Lose-lose.

            • karol 3.1.1.1.3.1

              I strongly support Mana. I always thought IMP was a bad idea, and an unnecessary new party.

              It had KDC’s identity all over it – a gamer out to win. He launched into it without a lot of consideration of the unintended consequences – him becoming a target at focus for right wing forces, very much into the Game mentality, rallying all their forces against IMP and the left generally. And he didn’t really work in a true alliance with the rest of the left parties.

              KDC set a short term goal of winning, using whatever methods possible. It trumped the longer term, more substantial approach of building a narrative: a narrative that is strongly grounded in left wing values. And in so doing it undercut left wing values and delivered them to the well oiled right wing smear machine.

              There is no short cut to building a coherent, coordinated left wing movement, grounded in clear left wing values and principles.

              • Olwyn

                KDC himself now thinks his brand is “toxic” and harmed Mana. I personally have nothing against KDC, and am grateful to him for drawing our attention to the extent to which we are spied on. But whatever mistakes Mana/KDC may have made – they were not the opposition.

                Look at the difference between Labour’s treatment of IMP and Key’s treatment of the Conservatives, whose leader also attracts controversy.

                • karol

                  Did I ever say KDC or IMP were the opposition? My position is not so clear cut. It’s possible to disagree with the whole IP enterprise, and to be supportive of KDC’s case in the spying thing.

                  I don’t particularly like the KDC persona – to me his public persona is not in accord with left wing values. And in the election, he and IP largely worked to distract from strongly opposing Key and the Nats.

                  I also think other left wing parties could have worked together in a stronger alliance – and that doesn’t need to have included strongly promoting “strategic voting”.

                  It’d be better to educate more people on the importance of the party vote.

                  • Olwyn

                    Sorry – my emphasis was in reference to my own earlier comment – that Labour ‘s treatment of IMP showed a lack of hunger for winning, and not in reference to anything you said. I agree that there is no short cut to building a movement, but I also think that hunger for change sometimes means taking risks – which, by definition, don’t always come off.

                    • Colonial Rawshark

                      that Labour ‘s treatment of IMP showed a lack of hunger for winning

                      And also a predilection to fall straight into the right wing framing of Internet Mana and KDC.

                  • Colonial Rawshark

                    It’s possible to disagree with the whole IP enterprise, and to be supportive of KDC’s case in the spying thing.

                    How can you disagree with IMP getting so very close to getting Hone Harawira into Parliament as a party leader, and getting Laila Harre into Parliament as a party leader.

                    The IMP approach really only screwed up on 2 counts.

                    1) KDC should have quietly disappeared in the last month of the election campaign. Therefore, no Moment of Truth etc.

                    2) More time and resource needed to be poured into Te Tai Tokerau to secure an extra 1K to 2K votes for Hone.

                    • blue leopard

                      I was more than a little surprised and disappointed that Hone wasn’t strongly visible.

                      I thought that the money would be used to ensure that he (and thus his message) was.

                      I, therefore, am of the opinion that Hone remaining invisible was one of the biggest mistakes. He was the leader from the previously existing party and I fail to understand why he didn’t get as much airtime as Laila. (Laila was good, she was very good, but Hone should have been visible too)

                      Perhaps this was out of their control? That the TV programmes approached Laila , but I suspect something could have been done, that wasn’t, from the party’s side to get more balanced coverage (of Hone as well as Laila).

              • blue leopard

                Karol,

                You do realise that IMP was the only leftwing party to grow their support in this year’s election? (compared to election 2011), unless you consider NZ First as left wing.

                While initially very supportive of the idea of Mana joining with IP, I did develeop reservations toward KDC’s approach as time went on, however it was entirely possible that people could have chosen to see through all the vitriol and spin directed toward KDC and IMP and to recognise that they were actually addressing the two most important issues in this country: poverty and privacy (spying or abuse of power). They were also promoting a very savvy idea of developing internet business in this country.

                At the very least, it would be great to see people recognising these things about IMP after all the pomp & ceremony and tension of the election campaign has died down.

                KDC’s biggest ‘crime’ was speaking out IMO, I think New Zealanders are way too disapproving of speaking out and protest, and difference. I don’t think this norm is serving us well at all.

                I actually wish that KDC would stay in the public eye, with the view that people would actually start to get used to this way of being and then there would be some chance that the suffocating tight grip of ‘don’t rock the boat’ unspoken [but-not-very-unspoken-if-u-break-it] rule in this country might actually be loosened from around our necks, mouths and lives.

                • + 1 I agree with most of that. It could be that The Internet Party was just a bit too much too soon for many and that with a longer lead-in time the public would have got used to them.

                  Personally I think ‘they’ wanted Mana and Hone out of parliament and KDC provided the hook to do that – if he hadn’t come along the unholy ganging up in TTT would still have occurred.

                  I do also think that Hone was quiet during the election campaign – the car accident, the shot through the window, disgruntled Mana candidate, the tiredness he must have felt by servicing his large electorate and being the ‘man of Mana’ may have all contributed plus he gave Laila plenty of room to grab the spotlight and promote IMP.

                  Mistakes were made and I don’t think the same ones will be made next time.

                  • blue leopard

                    “Personally I think ‘they’ wanted Mana and Hone out of parliament and KDC provided the hook to do that – if he hadn’t come along the unholy ganging up in TTT would still have occurred.”

                    Absolutely agree, I have been noticing Hone being singled out and targetted for years, I can’t remember which Waitangi day it was (probably all of them), but I believe it was 2013, media attention was very much focused on Hone’s family and ‘how dastardly they were’, this was seeding ideas in peoples’ heads early.

                    They followed this ‘idea’ later in the year with coverage of Hone’s relations being in court. The narrative was one that was totally trying to connect ‘negative’ with Hone in peoples’ minds. I am in no doubt about this.

                    Then KDC came along and they totally picked the weakness. ‘German’ (foreigner), ‘Hitler’, ‘Fat’, ‘influencing politics’ The negative reports about Hone stopped and negative reports of KDC didn’t end.

                    I don’t know who ‘they’ are either, but am guessing it is the corporate agenda because Mana are pretty clear on where they stand over the damage corporates create and have policies to address that.

                    The other reason I think ‘they’ is an active corporate agenda, is because they are the ones with the money and means (ownership of media) to influence the narrative in this way. (Heck unsure about the grammar in this paragraph!)

                    I really would like KDC to continue in the public eye, we really need to get over ourselves, yet can fully understand why he might choose not to.

                • SHG

                  Errr, IMP didn’t exist in 2011. The Internet Party was only founded THIS YEAR.

                  I guess then that IMP increased its share of the vote by INFINITY PERCENT!!11

                  • blue leopard

                    Yes, I was rather hoping that people would get the sense of my referring to an increase for IMP without going all pedantic on it.

                    Sigh Oh well.

                    Never mind, infinity percent sounds like an achievement anyway 😉

            • Murray Rawshark 3.1.1.1.3.2

              Olwyn, Labour saying that would mean accepting that they do not represent our poorest citizens. Labour will never admit this, even though their policies are designed to better the situation of the middle so that something will trickle down to the bottom. They’re just NAct, but aiming a bit lower.

              I believe they do see Mana as a greater threat than NAct because if they accept that Mana fills a gap, what is their own reason to exist?

              • Colonial Rawshark

                Similar dynamic to the Occupy movement in the USA. Occupy Wall St was a threat to the ruling elite – but particularly to the Democrats not the Republicans. Why? Because Occupy made it very easy to see that what the Democrats said they stood for, and what they actually did, were two very different things.

          • SHG 3.1.1.1.4

            Treating politics as a game is the only way to win at it. Anyone who doesn’t treat politics as a game deserves to lose.

        • left for deadshark 3.1.1.2

          Here,here CV
          As a favorite New Zealand son would have said,(use your brains).

      • karol 3.1.2

        Agree with this. Strategic voting by the left could bring a load of unintended consequences.

        • Colonial Rawshark 3.1.2.1

          But so could campaigning with the Greens and also letting a small truly left wing party develop in its own time.

          Sooner or later Labour is going to get to the point where it has nothing left to lose. Its only 1-2 elections from there now, actually.

        • The Gormless Fool formerly known as Oleolebiscuitbarrell 3.1.2.2

          Strategic voting by the left could bring a load of unintended consequences.

          Like government

          • Colonial Rawshark 3.1.2.2.1

            People here are advocating for Labour to keep fighting an FPP war. Don’t support Hone Harawira, take his seat. Push Annette Sykes from contention. Personally gift Dunne another 3/4 million dollars in Ohariu.

            But Labour gets to keep the (false, and losing) moral high ground of ignoring the flexibility and nuances of MMP.

            • Tautoko Mangō Mata 3.1.2.2.1.1

              This is where the potential coalition needs to work more as a TEAM rather than as isolated units during the election period.
              Be open and honest about it. In some electorates, there could be spokespeople (rather than candidates) with the meme ” we endorse the xxxxx candidate who is the coalition candidate for this electorate vote. However only a party vote for Labour will give us the power and influence to implement Labour’s excellent policies in the coalition government.
              For a progressive representative in this electorate vote ……..Name, Party vote Labour

          • phillip ure 3.1.2.2.2

            @ gormless..

            ..+ 1..

            ..i mean..it hasn’t worked for national..has it..?

            ..swamped in ‘unintended consequences’ as they are..

    • blue leopard 3.2

      +1 Gormless Fool formerly known as Oleolebiscuitbarell @ 3

      …seems to be a bit of a blindspot being discovered here…

  4. boldsirbrian 4

    None of the candidates has yet shown any insight into the realities of strategic voting that I am aware of. They seem to be all singing off the same song sheet, that gaining votes at the expense of all parties is better than targeting votes at the expense of the right.

    I would particularly like Nanaia’s views on this, as she is still my most favoured candidate. She considers one of her major achievements is the “success” on the Maori seats. It WAS an achievement, but a misguided goal .

    All of the Maori seats have the possibility of benefitting Mana and Labour in a pre-election coalition deal. Several Mana electorate seats and Labour party votes in a couple, and Green Party votes in another couple. Nothing would signify coalition better.

    Labour also has the power to make this term, Dunne’s last.

    • Chooky 4.1

      +100 boldsirbrian

    • also labour only won those maori seats because maori party/mana split the vote..

      ..(should they reach some agreement on the carve-up of the seats..labour are toast in those seats..)

      ..and thinking about the ohariu result never fails to get me somewhat apoplectic..(not good this early hour of the morning..)

      ..how the greens insistance on both standing a candidate there..

      ..and on not instructing their supporters to vote tactically..(but really..just standing the candidate was their major self-hurting screw-up..

      ..they couldn’t even think that one thru..?..f.f.s..!)

      ..how both these idiot-actions gifted the seat to the man who has kept them out of govt..(!!!)..now..how on any level..is that not seriously fucked up..?..the greens ‘gift’ a seat..to their mortal enemy..how can that not bring on an attack of face-palming on the part of the observer..?..)

      ..dunne ‘won’ by his 800 votes..

      ..the green candidate got over 2,500 votes..

      ..and thereby set a new benchmark in ‘hollow-victory’..

      ..if the left/progressives don’t get this sorted out..this how to win under mmp..

      ..they will just face serial-defeats..

      ..it’s as simple as that..

      • sabine 4.2.1

        good to know that i am not the only one that gets the hives every time i see Dunne.
        It pisses me off to no end. End to say that the Green voters need to be instructed? Really what would they have needed? A letter by, with candy bar attached?
        This election was a bout wining and if not possible to inflict harm and keep enablers out. And the labour and the greens have both helped their opponent.

        but hey now we get to vote for the middle manager that caused that fuck up in the first place.
        Aren’t we lucky?

        • boldsirbrian 4.2.1.1

          @ sabine (4.2.1)

          It pisses me off to no end. End to say that the Green voters need to be instructed? Really what would they have needed? A letter by, with candy bar attached?

          It’s no use getting pissed with the Greens. All the Greens needed, and even wanted (even asked for) was cooperation leading up to the election. Labour invited Greens voters to compete against them. Result: Dunne.

      • boldsirbrian 4.2.2

        .
        @phillip ure (4.2)

        Dunne’s win was not the Greens fault. It was Labour’s fault for treating the Greens with contempt in the election campaign.

        Labour needs to urgently learn about the realities of MMP. Perhaps Labour could hire John Key as a consultant, just on this particular issue

        • phillip ure 4.2.2.1

          i’m calling bullshit on that..bold brian..

          ..i realise labour ‘refused to co-operate’..

          ..(tho’ we still don’t know what level of co-operation the greens were seeking..)

          ..but for the greens not to make that unilateral decision to get rid of their mortal enemy..dunne..by the simple act of just not standing a candidate against him..

          ..still deserves one of the braindead-awards from that election..(how can it not..?..)

          .and don’t get me started on how dumbarse green voters in ohariu must be..

          ..as sabine noted..what do they actually need done to point out the bleeding obvious to them..?

          ..are they unable to think for themselves..?

          ..are they really that fucken dumb..?

          ..those 2,500+ green voters in ohariu..

          .(and their green party leaders..)

        • sabine 4.2.2.2

          Rubbish, the Green know that they go with Labour. Full stop.

          The green posed smugly grinning with David Cunliffe.

          what should they need? hampers, instructions, footmassages? Maybe some verbal gushing about their electric cars?

          Holy moly, really If the Green and labour needed more instruction and incentives to work together in order to defeat the people that are going to sell this country, its resources, its plains, its mountains, and its forest and rivers to the higher bidder and fucked be the citizens, than both parties are useless and should go bust.

          Labour can go manage something in human resources and the Green party can apply world wide for the Job of the green office Manager.

          I needed no instruction on how to vote in this election and in many others. I have always voted for what long term is best for the country, usually this means either greens or labour depending on where I live and who needs the party votes.

          I need no one to tell me that I should under no circumstance enable Dunne to help National sell the family silver.

          The Greens are grown People, they have been on Camera all the time, on Facebook, on any social media possible. And they could not think that standing a Candidate in Ohariu would be lost votes? No that is not labours fault, that bit of Hubris can be laid on to the steps of the green party office,.

          NO Discipline. Thats why the left looses.

          Also I am still waiting for the Green Ghost Candidate of Te Atatu South to manifest her/himself. Cause that was the one person during the election that was missing in action. Internet Mana – present and out and about. National – the blue shirts were everywhere every day. labour – Phil Twyford basically lived in his Van and hung out on every Streetcorner out West. The Green Candidate- must have been waiting on instructions from the Green and the Labour Party.

          • Draco T Bastard 4.2.2.2.1

            It wasn’t standing a candidate that was the problem. In fact, as it stands they pretty much have to. The problem was that they didn’t strongly suggest to their supporters to vote for the Labour candidate.

            This fiasco also shows why we need preferential voting in electorates. Then the Greens could have chosen Greens first, Labour second and National third (I maintain that we need to have it so that there’s at least three preferences marked).

            • phillip ure 4.2.2.2.1.1

              @ draco..

              “..t wasn’t standing a candidate that was the problem. In fact, as it stands they pretty much have to…”

              it was ‘the problem’..and no..they don’t ‘have to’…

              .it’s not compulsory…

              • Draco T Bastard

                /facepalm

                It’s not compulsory but it is pretty much required to boost their allowed advertising spend. I’ve explained this to you before.

                What you’re suggesting would probably have resulted in Dunne winning an even greater majority.

                As I said, we need preferential voting in electorates rather than FPP.

                • and i replied to you before..

                  ..some/a soupcon of advertising spend..?..vs..getting rid of dunne…

                  ..and the greens chose ‘a’…(!)

                  ..(well done..!..those greens..thinking of the common-good there..eh..?..)

                  ..and please further expand on yr claim the greens not standing ‘would probably have resulted in Dunne winning an even greater majority.’

                  ..i’m probably a bit slow…but i can’t see how you came to that conclusion..

                  ..and as for pref-voting..you had may as well wish for ponies for all of us..

                  ..we have to deal with the realities of the here and now..

                  .and one of the ugly ‘realities’ of the election tactics used by the greens..

                  ..was the gifting of ohariu to dunne..

                  • The Al1en

                    Which candidates from what parties in which seats said tactical vote to unseat tory/crony mps?
                    If any of them said it, it didn’t get much airtime as I never heard the message on the news, but fortunately I have a brain and don’t need to be told how to vote, so tactical vote is what I did anyway, par for the course.
                    Can’t criticise the people who didn’t though, just ’cause the result is off. Just like it’s not the fault of the greens that labour dismissed their offer of a more unified campaign, instead sending an every man/woman for themselves message.

                    Haters gotta hate and spinners gotta spin.
                    Scapegoating to arse cover the failure of the extreme left to engage any of the forgotten million, or the center left to pick up 5-10% of swing votes.

                    Has to be the fault of MT and RN. 🙄

                • The Al1en

                  “/facepalm
                  I’ve explained this to you before.”

                  You’re not the only one, on both counts.

            • Rodel 4.2.2.2.1.2

              DTB
              If the left are being encouraged to wrought the voting system as the right does then the system is faulty and needs to be strengthened or even changed.

              Personally I like to vote for a person who represents my values rather than a party with preselected people who I probably know little about.

              At a party meeting I attended some years ago where list candidates were being chosen I was not impressed by the hasty superficiality of the process. The general public had little or no input into the selections and I’m sure weren’t very aware on election day of who the list candidates were.

              STV (preferential voting) or some other form of instant runoff system that is resistant to manipulative voting and all votes count for something should be adopted .
              At present it feels a lot like gerrymandering.

              • Draco T Bastard

                If the left are being encouraged to wrought the voting system as the right does then the system is faulty and needs to be strengthened or even changed.

                Yes, the system is faulty. We even had a review on it that suggested some fixes – a review that National subsequently ignored as it obviously didn’t fit their agenda of continuing to screw over the country.

                BTW, the word you were looking for is rort.

                Personally I like to vote for a person who represents my values rather than a party with preselected people who I probably know little about.

                The majority of people vote along party lines because a) it’s easier to keep track of what the party’s policies are than an individuals and b) tribalism. This is pretty much why we don’t have independent MPs voted into parliament.

          • Colonial Rawshark 4.2.2.2.2

            NO Discipline. Thats why the left looses.

            Bingo. That and pretending there is some sort of moral high ground in fighting an FPP war.

            • phillip ure 4.2.2.2.2.1

              @ colonial..

              “..and pretending there is some sort of moral high ground in fighting an FPP war…”

              ..i agree…that one is also a total head-fuck..

              ..where the hell is the ‘immorality’ in strategic-voting in an mmp environment..?

              ..especially when not doing so hands victory to yr opponents..

              ..on a silver platter…

              ..just..so..dumb..

        • Sabine 4.2.2.3

          I call BS. There were a lot of pictures floating around of the Green Leaders sitting with Cunliffe and smiling from one ear to the other.

          I actually thought it was good that the Greens campaigned on their own to show case their policies and their ideas. But underlining it was always clear to me and those around me that should labour pull of the win, it would be the Greens that they would go into a coalition with.

          So essentially the Greens would have gotten into Parliament with Labour, and they would have campaigned on their own. Win Win. Any gains they would have made would have been on the strength of their policies and their candidates.

          Nope, in my view it is the party purists that lost these two seats for us.
          . Green and only Green, or labour and only Labour when clearly in Ohariu and Te Tau Tokerau it would have been better to vote for the ”other”, and the same counts for Auckland Central.

        • ghostwhowalksnz 4.2.2.4

          Its the Greens fault for running in electorate seats at all.

          Its crazy as it has prevented them going above above 11% as some voters feel they have given them one vote but not two.

          if you only want voters to make one choice, then only give them one

  5. RJL 5

    You do have to bear in mind that, for example, the 40% (or so) of National voters who *didn’t* for the Seymour hologram in Epsom, might be motivated to do so if there was a very explicit Labour/Green direction to vote for the National candidate. So, mobilising Labour/Green voters to vote strategically might merely galvanise more National voters.

    The fact of the matter is that 63% of Epsom voters are National voters. It’s not really viable to dislodge ACT from Epsom as long as ACT has National support.

    • sabine 5.1

      Epsom is the one seat that I care the least about. It was clear from the onset that unless Labour and Green hold their noses and vote Act will manage to sneak by.

      but Ohariu, Te Tau Tokerau and also Auckland Central.

      Again, this is not so much about winning only, but also to show dicipline in the face of a fearsome opponent and his party machine.

      What did we get? Dunne, Davis and the Kaye…why did we get it? Because both on the red and the green side of the spectrum we did not vote in our best interest.

      but I am sure the Green in Ohariu and Auckland Central will feel good in their purity and have another vegan feast, and labour can pat themselves on the back for keeping Hone it his place.

      At the end of the day (TM), the loosers are the Citizens of NZ. The National Party is now unchecked, and will be unchecked until the Circus of the Leader Ship Selection and the working in time is over. By then the first year of Nationals Privatisation Coup has passed, the populace will be stunned into silence, and we will be looking at another Leadership selection – because the white middle manager are as useless as they have shown themselves to be during the election time. .

      The problem with the left is that they want to be holier than thou and they have no discipline. None. What so Ever!

      • phillip ure 5.1.1

        oy..!..sabine..leave the ‘vegans’ out of this..!

        ..factcheck:..no green mp’s are vegans…

        ..(and their brains are clearly befuddled by their consumption of animal flesh/fats/bye-products..

        ..they’ll do that to ya..!..those flesh/fats/bye-products..)

        • Sabine 5.1.1.1

          I am an omnivore for what is it worth. but funnily enough, one of the biggest articles in the Herald about the greens on election day was about their vegan feast. …I thought it was funny as to what was prioritized.

          As for vegans, i was given a lecture by some 20 year olds the other day that I can;t use Honey as that would be cruel to the bees. I am sorry, but the vegan movement lost me there and then, and with it a lot of respect. Honey is one of the oldest form of medicine on this planet, and i can’t use it because it would be animal abuse? Tui!

          I can understand anyone who does not eat meat, but in saying that, I used to be hungry a lot some 20 odd years ago….I have learned that when one is hungry enough, one eats what is served, not what is emotionally pure. However, with increasing income it is easier to be picky in how my food is produced.

          • phillip ure 5.1.1.1.1

            “..…I thought it was funny as to what was prioritized. ..”

            ..especially when none of them are vegans…eh..?

            ..but it is an improvement from my green-years..

            ..when i tried..sometimes politely..sometimes not..(and to little avail..)..

            ..to point out that maybe ..trying to look at the big-picture..green party bbq’s were an idea/practice that needed re-evaluation..(and that the vegan option was the only one guaranteed to offend nobody on ‘clean’/unclean-food grounds..)

            ..so good on them for getting that right now..shame they also haven’t got on board..but they do so love their leather..eh..?..

            ..and yr slagging of vegans for not eating honey..is just bullshit..

            ..one of the basic premises of a vegan lifestyle/choice is the decision to not take the lives of living-creatures..just so they can eat..

            ..so were they to be ok about bees being killed so the food they have saved for winter can be ripped out and eaten..

            ..they cd be accused of inconsistancies..

            ..and it’s honey..it isn’t a bloody cure for cancer..is it..?

            ..and some chinese swear by some of ‘the oldest form of medicine on this planet’..

            ..,ground up rhino-horns/tiger-penises..etc..etc..

            ..so that ‘medicine over killing bees’ argument from you has more holes than a vegetable-colander..

            ..eh..?

            ..so yr ‘tui’ right back at ya..eh..?

            • Chooky 5.1.1.1.1.1

              @pu…bee keepers take honey comb with honey but not all of it …and they supply the bees with sugar syrup in their hives …so the bees do not die of starvation at all in winter…no probs with taking honey!

              …also many hives swarm because the numbers are too great or too many queens …and begin hives elsewhere starting from nothing

              • and no bees die…eh..?

                ..and their winter food supplies..are replaced with sugar-syrup..

                ..and once again..no bees die/starve..eh..?

                ..and globally..bee numbers in decline..

                ..but just carry on..!..eh..?

                • Chooky

                  @pu ….bee keepers have been harvesting honey for 15,000 years

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beekeeping

                  Recent crises in bee numbers and colony collapse disorder ( CCD) is a recent phenomenon due to things like pesticides and neonicotinoids, loss of habitat, pathogens , Immunodeficiencies and infestations of Varoa mite …not beekeepers collecting honey per se…it is not in their interests to starve bees

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony_collapse_disorder

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neonicotinoid

                  • people have also been grinding up tigers’penises/rhino horns for a very long time..

                    ..plus slavery has been a constant for as long..

                    ..and so yr longevity-as-reason-to-continue-point is..?

                    • Chooky

                      @ Pu …the point is that recent bee hive collapse is NOT due to taking honey and starving bees to death! ( read the links)

                      … you are an idiot!

                      …most beekeepers I know love their bees…and do NOT kill their bees..but do their best to keep their bees healthy and protect them from things largely outside their control eg recent invasion into NZ of Varoa mite and other nasties eg ( American Foul Brood)

                      …kept bee hives often survive a lot longer than hives in the wild!

                      …..suggest you take up beekeeping and get some real life experience with bees!..and you will find beekeepers planting trees/bushes / crops which are food supply for their bees

                    • much like piggery owners ‘love’ their little wee piglets..eh..?

                      ..(they make money from them..they are a cash-crop..

                      ..yes..they ‘love’ the money they make from them..

                      ..end of story..

                      ..and yr claims that no bees die..and no bees are harmed from their winter supply of food being taken from them..

                      ..are nonsensical..

                    • Chooky

                      except people dont eat bees! ( unlike pigs)

                      …and bees swarm and take off and build new hives with their new queens all the time ….so are always starting up from scratch in the wild with no honey stores

                      ….really all bee keepers are doing are providing bees with nice warm safe houses and taking some honey as rent

                      ( also in order to protect bees from Varoa mite and AFB beekeepers have to go to considerable trouble and use considerable skill)

                      you know sweet- f- all about bees and bee keeping!

                      i might also add that the African bee varieties in South America do not seem to have the problems of the North American and European bee varieties…so whatever it is that is killing these off does not apply to the African variety ( natural selection at work?) Some beekeepers are now working with African bees in North America and getting very good results with none of the problems of hive collapse ( incidentally colony collapse is a problem which has happened every so often throughout the centuries …so not a new problem)

                    • u r clearly having comprehension-issues with the reasons vegans decide to just leave bees alone..

                      ..to not ‘just charge them some rent’..

                      ..(which is quite the euphemism for removing the winter food-supplies for a hive of bees..eh..?..)

                      ..vegans in general eschew any animal bye-products..

                      ..which honey surely is..

                      ..what do you find so difficult to understand about that..?

                      ..how about you tell me how you justify killing and eating animals..?

                      ..when ..as vegans prove..you don’t have to..

                    • The Al1en

                      Knock it on the head, Philip, ffs.

                      “..how about you tell me how you justify killing and eating animals..?..when ..as vegans prove..you don’t have to..”

                      All about the blame game with you it seems.
                      You could get nutrition from a pill these days, just like in the Jetsons, but you don’t, so Justify defiling mother earth with your hoes and hybridised seedlings when you don’t have to.
                      That is the level of your argument. 🙄

                    • “..Knock it on the head..”

                      ..that is yr area of expertise..

                    • The Al1en

                      Double tap for blogging zombies… Your area of expertise.

                    • Chooky

                      @ pu…how about you tell me how you justify killing vegetables?

                      ….and I take it that you NEVER grow veges to eat ?( if so you are a murderer)

                      …and …oh no!… (if you dont have a vege garden and kill the sweet little veges yourself) …., you dont get other people to do your dirty work do you?

                      …and what about the fruit trees and the nut trees….you must not take their babies and eat them !!!!….that is a wicked thing to do!
                      ( they didnt grow their nuts and fruits for you to eat!)

                      …oh so you eat grass?…but have you asked the grass if it wants a haircut….that is so NOT fair !!!!…poor grass…you are exploiting the grass…….!.

                      you vege eating, vege killing , plant mutilating, tree freeloading, baby nut and fruit eating…. vegan bastard!

                      …call veganism an excuse for living!

                    • whoar..!

                      ..flightless-bird totally ‘loses it’…

                    • The Al1en

                      “except people dont eat bees! ( unlike pigs)”

                      Them pigs will eat anything
                      Or
                      Mmm, honey roasted ham

                    • Colonial Rawshark

                      Al1en you stirrer 😛

                    • The Al1en

                      And I don’t even eat the stuff 😆

            • phillip ure 5.1.1.1.1.2

              and another ‘omnivore’ sneering at vegans..eh..?

              ..it isn’t like we don’t already have enough of them..eh..?

              ..those ‘sneering omnivores’…

            • Clemgeopin 5.1.1.1.1.3

              ..,ground up rhino-horns/tiger-penises..etc..etc..

              Now there is an alternative anyway. Scientists and doctors are now able to print out body parts! Horns, penises, nipples and stuff are sure to follow soon, I presume. Oh, what joy for vegans!

              body-parts-scientists-can-3-d-print

              • i actually welcome the impending arrival of the likes of realistic-to-consumer lab-grown/printed-out meats and the like..

                ..(and of course..mufree..the milk substitute..that is once again..’realistic to consumers’..can be used for baking etc..)

                ..i am not naieve enough to think that everyone will go vegan anytime soon..they are too addicted to the tastes/oral-sensations..

                ..and/but no animals are harmed with lab-grown meats..

                ..so i have no problem with people eating that..

                ..want lab-grown tiger-penises..?

                ..fill yer boots..!

        • The Al1en 5.1.1.2

          “their brains are clearly befuddled by their consumption of animal flesh/fats/bye-products….they’ll do that to ya..!..those flesh/fats/bye-products..”

          Extremist veggie claptrap.
          When contemplating befuddlement, those in glass houses shouldn’t throw walnuts.

      • Draco T Bastard 5.1.2

        The problem with the left is that they want to be holier than thou and they have no discipline. None. What so Ever!

        QFT

        And that needs to change ASAP. Once in government we can change the rules so as to enforce more honest electioneering.

    • Colonial Rawshark 5.2

      What you are describing is the normal reaction/counter reaction of election campaigns and electoral reactions. It can go the other way of course. If there is a credible campaign to get more Green and Labour voters voting National and ACTs margin gets whittled away by a few thousand, the soft National party voter might very well join in.

      Your overall point is a good one though – at the end of the day it will probably only make enough of a difference if there is also a general swing against National.

      • RJL 5.2.1

        Yes, normal reaction cycle. But the cycle means it is dangerous to say “we win if only this changed”, without acknowledging that if you make a change, then the opponent does too.

        In Epsom, specifically, the “soft National voter” is probably most of the 40% of National voters who are already voting for the National candidate. Seymour’s 60% are the *committed* National voters.

  6. tc 6

    “…but the nice guys are finishing last. Enough already, time for the Left to use the same tactics as the Nats…”

    Agree however the left has shown despite clear evidence that strategic voting was required in both 2011 and 2014 they value ‘principles’ over winning.

    National thanks the left for this noble but losing strategy, and is taking notes on the labour leadership circus in preparation for 2017.

    Sabine @ 5.1 nails it.

    • “..National thanks the left for this noble but losing strategy..”

      i understand that dunne has a shrine in his bedroom..that he gives thanks to morning/nite/each time his ‘party-leader’ pay-cheque arrives..

      ..and i am told it contains pictures of russel norman and metiria turei..

  7. Zolan 7

    I don’t see the point in rolling Dunne when there’s no risk of others coat-tailing in.
    UF doesn’t provide the same cover for bad policy as ACT, and is probably less useful to National than one of their own.

    Actually winning Ohariu for the Left would be something, although it’s still just an electorate seat.

    • Sirenia 7.1

      The Green candidate in Ohariu did not seek the electorate vote and told people to vote for the Labour candidate. It could be that the Green voters were Nat voters who disliked both Dunne and the National candidate (who got in on the list) and that it was their protest vote.

      • phillip ure 7.1.1

        @ sirenia..

        ..sirenia just walks away with todays’ long-bow award…

        ..for that whopper..

        ..whoar..!

      • ghostwhowalksnz 7.1.2

        Why the hell was she even standing if she didnt ‘want their vote’.

        Its batshit stupid to stand and then say dont vote for me.

        • blue leopard 7.1.2.1

          I have heard, via other comments on the Standard, that having an electorate candidate helps to strengthen the party vote – perhaps this has to do with greater visibility in the district or something (unsure).

          • phillip ure 7.1.2.1.1

            @ blue leopard..

            ..yeah..that is usually the reason proffered..

            ..that ‘greater visibility’ from electorate-meetings and the like.

            ..turnout to most of those meetings..aside from candidates and their teams/family..

            ..is minimal most of the time..

            ..and the ‘greater exposure’ is at best a line or two in a local-rag..

            ..so..basically..as a reason to stand..vs the strategic-benefits of not standing..(c.f..ohariu..)

            ..those reasons/arguments to stand just do not stand up..

            ..and of course..candidates standing everywhere means they are not available to the general campaign..(as mana found out..to its’ loss..)

            ..a well-focused party-only vote in an electorate has the potential to pull far more votes..

            ..than a few electorate meetings..and a line or two in the local giveaway rag..

    • Colonial Rawshark 7.2

      You roll Dunne in order to remove one support MP from the National Government and make them ever more reliant on the Maori Party.

      • Zolan 7.2.1

        Ok, I forgot Ohariu was actually winnable by the Left, rather than just a choice between UF and National.

  8. Papa Tuanuku 8

    I find the approach of this post a bit self defeating.

    It’s not about the green voters in ohariu voting for the labour candidate, it’s about the greens not standing a candidate. Standing a candidate, making it easier for Dunn to get in, is a betrayal of the majority of people, especially when you weigh up the crap that Dunn has voted for and gotten away with.

  9. William 9

    “Enough already, time for the Left to use the same tactics as the Nats… ”

    Of course the opportunity to use those tactics is probably three years away. In the meantime there’s changes that could be made. Silly Judith is no longer the minister making decisions, surely it makes more sense at this stage to campaign together to have the 2012 MMP Review recommendations implemented.

  10. Chooky 10

    wont hold my breath but strategically speaking the vote for the new Labour leader should be Nanaia Mahuta

    … Mahuta is the one with integrity and broad working class and female and Maori and Polynesian appeal …( ie the old Labour Party before it got rogered by the white middle class boys )

    …and imo she would grow into the job and become a great leader ( she has more parliamentary and flaxroots experience than the other ambitious middle class white boys and she is well qualified with an MA Hons in Social Anthropology…plus she comes from a line of very esteemed Maori with great MANA )

    …if she is not elected as leader …i think a break away Labour Party should be formed in tight coalition with Mana/Int and the Greens ( and Winnie NZF…if he behaves himself)…and the Maori Party ( if willing)

    ….and it will be RIP or bugger this NZ Labour Party

    • Clemgeopin 10.1

      Very good points, (but I would rather the recalcitrant disloyal leaking louts leave instead).

  11. Clemgeopin 11

    One does not need much intelligence, wisdom or common sense to understand that in order to have a greater chance of being able to form a government under MMP, the left oriented progressive parties MUST contest the seats in a strategic manner in all crucial and marginal seats. There will not be too many of those seats.

    May be about a dozen at the most, but would make a big difference to whether we can form a government or not. The obvious ones at the last election were TTT, Epsom, Ohariu and some Auckland seats. There may be a few other electorates that others here are aware of. The wise heads of the parties, Labour, Greens, IMP and perhaps even NZF should get together well before the next elections and work out possible seat arrangements for mutual benefit to ensure success in forming the government. There is no shame in working cooperatively in an MMP environment so that votes are not foolishly split in crucial electorates. National have realised this basic imperative. Time for other parties to follow suit in their own interest.

    It would be a worthwhile for number crunchers to look at the results of the recent election in each seat and identify the possible crucial electorates for this purpose for the next election in 2017.

  12. Tiger Mountain 12

    Labour put a good heave into Te Tai Tokerau’s West Auckland end, something they did not manage in various general seats, so it came from influential levels.

    Keith Locke’s 5 cents…
    http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2014/10/20/the-politics-of-electorate-accommodations/

    • Chooky 12.1

      +100 Tiger Mountain…..thanks for that …really good article by Keith Locke and analysis by Graeme Edgeler of the Legal Beagle blog

      …a Left coalition could have won that Election… despite the onslaught of the right wing msm and dirty PR attacks !

      ….pathetic that Labour etc couldnt get their strategic act together like the right wing

  13. Watching 13

    boldsirbrian said: Labour also has the power to make this term, Dunne’s last

    No – it will be the Nats who kill off Dunne in 2017.

    Understand what happen in Oharui this election is that Dunne only got 4k odd party votes & created a parliament overhang of 121 seats.
    There was no real benefit to the Nats, Key understood this, and Dunne didn’t even bother presenting his wish list to Key. Sure he got his Ministerial job but there is no UF policy included – unlike act

    So what would have happen if the Nats party voters had also voted for the Nats candidate in Oharui.
    – We would have a 120 seat parliament.
    – The redistribution of party votes (4k) is so small that it has negligible impact on the party vote percentage.
    – The Nats would now have 61 seats – by my calculations – but its ok to correct this assumption if I have it wrong. Even if I am wrong the Nats will still be 60/120 – not a majority but closer

    So what would have happen if the Labour candidate vote has ousted Dunne:
    – We would have a 120 seat parliament.
    – Little would not be contesting the Labour leadership & would be replaced by Anderson – what would the benefit be? with no increase in numbers.
    – Anderson would be a one term electorate MP in a tough environment – as the combine Dunne/Hudson electorate votes does suggest it’s solid Nat country.
    – Labour no longer has Dunne to remind the public of Keys election deals

    Karol’s comments are worth reading – because if you do something it doesn’t mean a particular outcome will follow. Like in sport or negotiations the other side (if prepared) will also adapt if you change.

    • Colonial Rawshark 13.1

      No – it will be the Nats who kill off Dunne in 2017.

      Your reasoning is flawed.

      Dunne still represents an *additional* support MP for the NATs, while National still gets all the MPs due to them from their high party vote.

      Therefore the NATs will keep Dunne around for 2017, 2020, 2023,…

  14. McFlock 14

    The rotten boroughs are an aberration. They’ll disappear as soon as national trends away from the monolith party it currently is.

    Epsom and Ohariu are a result of the fact that damned near a quarter of eligible voters chose to note vote. The Left joining the nats in playing silly buggers with the system is not goint to improve that statistic, and that’s the statistic that hurts the Left.

    Some of it is general apathy, but I think a lot of it is Russell Brand-style active disengagement. And that lets the bastards win.

    • blue leopard 14.1

      All left-wing parties made it pretty clear that had they got into power they would be addressing the rules that allow for this ‘rotten borough’ phenomenon to occur.

      Ignoring the effects of these ‘rotten’ strategies and continuing with a strategy that allows the parties playing these ‘rotten’ strategies to win power, is getting the left going nowhere and fast.

      Once a left-wing government finally wins power, can you just take time to picture how much time and energy is going to have to be spent simply reversing the damage that is being created by these National governments? The more this goes on, the less progressive approaches will be able to be put into place when progressives finally get into parliament. If no improvements are felt by the general public, then the chances of the progressives being voted out quickly again, are actually quite high.

      Had the left chosen to meet the ‘rotten’ strategies with some of their own – the problem of ‘rotten boroughs’ could well have been being addressed in the next year.

      I just don’t see that forgoing ‘rotten’ strategies when it allows the ‘rotten’ strategies to continue for longer is a very sound conclusion to draw.

      • McFlock 14.1.1

        Look, it’s the age-old dilemma of whether lowering oneself to the standards of the openly corrupt will be justified by the advantage it might give one.

        That’s predicated on two assumptions, though: that being openly corrupt will give one the same advantage, or at least achieve a desired outcome; and
        that the desired outcome will justify the means by which it was achieved.

        In this case, the first is extremely doubtful, to my mind. The second is similarly a bold call to make.

        • Colonial Rawshark 14.1.1.1

          although utilising one of the most obvious aspects of MMP that all parties voted for during electoral reform i.e. vote splitting is hardly a lower or corrupt standard.

          Problem is of course is that Labour has made a rod for their own back because that is how they have been portraying it for years…

          • Tracey 14.1.1.1.1

            I agree its their holier than thou stance which now bites them but I honestly think its cos too many in their strategy are still believing discrediting left and right will make them the biggezt party… despite all evidence to the contrary.

          • blue leopard 14.1.1.1.2

            Good point CR

            I think technically it can correctly be called corrupt because it is a corruption of the original purpose of the rule, which I assume was that if someone is locally supported strongly enough, they deserved to have their party vote represented in parliament.

            …actually it is a bit of a dumb rule from the outset, now that I have attempted to understand it’s purpose… 🙁

            Have I missed something?

            Oh! I guess what I have missed would be: allowing a way for a smaller party to gain representation because the threshold is pretty high. (i.e. a way to bypass the high threshold was built into the system)

          • McFlock 14.1.1.1.3

            “Vote splitting” is choosing the best party to vote for, and then the best person as electorate MP, where the best candidate does not belong to one’s preferred governing party.

            What goes on in Ohariu and Epsom is the opposite to what MMP was supposed to achieve: it is intended that the winning electorate MP determines the government by skewing the composition of parliament with an overhang.

            Further corrupting that system is not likely to result in better government.

          • Chooky 14.1.1.1.4

            …and I believe it is not about principles or “lowering oneself” or “corruption” it is all about , as Parker said: “We must be the main party of the left.”…

            …in other words it is about top dog competitive dinosaur WASP attitudes and non- cooperation with other parties on the Left……Labour can not see the bigger picture ….it is completely insular and is still stuck in FPP mentality …..

            • Colonial Rawshark 14.1.1.1.4.1

              Labour fully expects to regain its rightful electoral throne around the 35% to 45% mark.

              Pretty much what the NZ Liberals thought at the turn of the 20th century.

              • Chooky

                well they are not doing a good job of it!

              • greywarshark

                The Pretender to the Throne will come again.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s08AOiRmy3w – The Platters dish it out.
                Very apt.

                Oh-oh, yes I’m the great pretender
                Pretending that I’m doing well
                My need is such I pretend too much
                I’m lonely but no one can tell

                Oh-oh, yes I’m the great pretender
                Adrift in a world of my own
                I’ve played the game but to my real shame
                You’ve left me to grieve all alone

                Too real is this feeling of make-believe
                Too real when I feel what my heart can’t conceal

                Yes, I’m the great pretender
                Just laughin’ and gay like a clown
                I seem to be what I’m not, you see
                I’m wearing my heart like a crown
                Pretending that you’re still around

                Songwriters
                RAM, BUCK
                Note : Humour for TS
                Metrolyrics

        • Tracey 14.1.1.2

          the race to the bottom?

        • blue leopard 14.1.1.3

          I am not excellently pleased about finding myself promoting ‘dodgyish’ approaches*, however, I would say I was falling into the ‘desired outcomes will justify the means’ category (that you offered)

          …and I did state the justification very clearly: that if Labour got in it sounded like they would remove the coat-tailing which would stop the problem completely.

          So I would appreciate if you acknowledge that the ends is that of stopping the dodgy means being possible!

          Corrupt seems like bit of a strong word to use, yet if voting for an electorate candidate, that you wouldn’t otherwise vote for, in order to get more support for the party you want in power is corrupt, then surely voting in a manner that allows this wrought to continue is a case of [perhaps unintentionally] supporting the corruption?

          *It is debatable whether asking someone to vote in a manner that allows a more principled government to get in is that dodgy. Convoluted: yes Dodgy: debatable.

          • McFlock 14.1.1.3.1

            Firstly, coat-tailing is only part of the problem: neither dunne nor seymour brought additional mps in. However, by throwing the campaign in those electorates, national managed to preserve its tight-rope majority.

            Secondly, whether a party that stoops to the others’ level would create a “more principled” government is doubtful. The basic principle becomes that the “principled” party requires worthy intent of others, and because that is a good outcome it can use less-than-worthy intent to achieve that goal. Suddenly the rules apply to other parties, not it it. The new opposition points out the hypocrisy, and becomes even dirtier when it gets in power next time. Or would, but the principle of worthy intent doesn’t apply to the principled party, so… (ethicists and movie buffs might note this hypocrisy from the Batman movie “dark knight”, where batman uses invasive mass surveillance to beat the joker just this once, but destroys it afterwards because it should never be used. Well, until the next “just this once” comes along, and only by a secretive billionaire with significant personality disorders).

            Thirdly, arguing that not becoming corrupt allows a corrupt government to continue ignores the fact that it simply means that one corruptly-formed regime replaces another.

            But there’s still the more practical point that it assumes that anti-voting by the left will occur in a vacuum. The left fucked up the 2014 campaign somehow, in probably several different ways. The biggest problem was not a few thousand votes in two wealthy and long-term tory electorates, it was 25% Lab 11%Grn. Becoming as corrupt as the tories in two electorates will simply serve to harm real efforts to solve that problem.

            • blue leopard 14.1.1.3.1.1

              Your first point poses a real problem for my theory, you are quite correct – removing coat-tailing won’t affect the problem being discussed.

              I might have to revise my views to this:

              The left should continue with the similar strategy as the right with regards to voting for whatever electorate candidate is the most effective to get the left into power until rules change to address the issue over someone gaining, say 0.22% of the vote yet getting to represent the equivalent of 1% of the vote, in parliament.

              Perhaps the threshold should be dropped to 1% while we are at it and then there would be less need for that type of bypassing of the threshold from the outset?

              I am unclear why you are expressing so much concern about ‘corruption’ with regard to voting for a candidate that will get one’s party into power when it is almost semantics to call it corruption from the outset, while you seem to ignore the type of behaviour the Nats have been conducting for years now that would either come under the category of corrupt, unprincipled, damaging or all three.

              I am finding it difficult to argue this point because the point is so blatant I don’t actually ‘get’ what you are objecting to. Apart from maybe the argument that it might not work anyway, which is a bit of a futile one when it can be responded to by ‘why not try and see?’.

              The best thing for me to do, I guess, would be to type a comprehensive list of all the dodgy things that have gone on since National have been in power, so I could jog your memory and then ask you to please weigh up what you think is most unprincipled and corrupt between allowing the terrible actions of this government to continue or voting for a candidate that might actually get these buggers out of power?

              • McFlock

                I know the nats are bad, m’kay?

                If the left drag themselves down to the nat level (trying to game the system just for a margin for error that only counts if the left parties substantially up their support well in excess of that in the first place), it basically shits on the difference between the two blocs and still would leave key in government after the 2014 election. But maybe labgrn would be on 20%:9%, because they’d be even more of a joke than they are now.

                FFS, most of the self-loathing labourites who comment here have a problem with labour caucus members apparently selling out Labour Party principles. All the anti-vote plan would do is provide more ammunition for Labour party schisms – but this time, it would actually be the result of a clear decision to sell out in this electoral cycle. The nats would have a field day.

    • @ flock..

      ..those brand don’t-vote!-arguments can have some gravitas in a f.p.p.-environment..

      ..but not under mmp…

  15. wekarawshark 15

    A friend said to me recently that in her group people were confused because they couldn’t see how Labour could win the election with all the small parties on the left in existence (compared to the right). These are people who would probably vote GP and were worried. LOTS of work to be done here on educating people about MMP and how it actually works (these were 20 and 30 somethings).

    • blue leopard 15.1

      I actually caught myself thinking that way more than a few times.

      I kept comparing Labour’s polling with National’s and feeling a bit hopeless – like how is the left going to win. I kept forgetting to add in the Green’s or other left-wing parties.

      I think that the polling reports started being a bit better about adding Labour + Green together and comparing it to National (not sure about that), but even so, it required quite a concerted effort to stop comparing solely Labour’s support (30ish) with National’s (47ish).

      • wekarawshark 15.1.1

        I think they did get better (and an improvement on 2011). The MSM are daft, but Labour are dafter still. Had they accepted the GP offer of co-operating during the election, the MSM would have had no choice but to add their numbers together.

        The only way that Labour will ever be the government on its own again is if the GP collapses. Ain’t gonna happen, so all elections from now on have to be about coalition govts (and not some pissy We’re Really in Charge but you can tag along thing by Labour).

        • blue leopard 15.1.1.1

          Ah! Thanks for the confirmation re improvement in reporting.

          lol re Labour being dafter still +100

    • Colonial Rawshark 15.2

      Who have grown up politically in the era of MMP but still don’t get it. Sigh.

      • wekarawshark 15.2.1

        I know. I was quite shocked. I’ll have to ask where they get their political news from. I’m guessing some are still watching TV or talking to their parents/aunties/uncles etc.

        It might explain why the GP vote was lower than expected. Too many people thinking that they should vote Labour in order to keep National out (and then too many Labour voters voting for Peters).

        • blue leopard 15.2.1.1

          Gosh, I wonder why they would conclude Labour was the only choice in order to keep the Nats out?

          It is not as though that is what Labour were telling everyone, or anything…erhem…

          • Kiwiri - Raided of the Last Shark 15.2.1.1.1

            It is not as though that is what Labour were telling everyone, or anything…erhem…

            +1,000,000

            Indeed

      • blue leopard 15.2.2

        That is why I put in that comment @14.1. It seems to require a concerted effort not to simply compare Labour with National.

        Old habits die hard? And perhaps the way things are reported?

        All I can say, is I only voted in one FPP election, so it is weird – yet I guess Labour has been very much the largest leftwing party in most of those elections, since.

      • Sabine 15.2.3

        do they still teach civics in school, or has that been cancelled together with the arts, PE and Home Ed?

        This might explain why the young ones don’t know how their vote will affect the system.

        But in saying that, i really believe that a lot of the young ones simply don’t feel represented by the government (unless they are blue shirts who had young ones in masses at least out west).

        I also know of a few middle aged ones, without children, or not married, etc. that simply saw no reason to vote as none of the policies discussed would have affected them positively in any which way.

        I don’t blame people for not voting, if in Parliament a MP can vote abstain, so should the public come election day.

        I fault the Parties for having Policies that are only geared to the ones that have children (some of us don’t have children), while not addressing the root cause – namely the poverty of the working parents.
        Lifting the minimum wage should have gotten way more spiel than the free doctor visits for kids. Etc etc.
        Compulsory Kiwi/safer without any guarantee of a payout after 40 odd years? Really is there still someone around who thinks that was a good idea? Nothing against the Kiwi safer (i have one), but make the money available every 5 – 10 years. Peoples lives change, stuff happenes and clearly the Kiwi safer will never pay the same amount of interest than the one that is charged on a loan by the bank. etc. etc. etc.

        so really better education in schools to our political process and political history…how many know who John Savage was? And policies that are geared towards the voting public….all of the voting public not as interest groups but as the citizens of a country that will do well if we all keep up our end of this generational contract that binds us.

  16. blue leopard 16

    Let’s not forget the marvellous tutorial that TVNZ/Q&A/Colmar Brunton supplied to the people of Epsom on how to vote strategically if you wanted National to win:

    http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1408/S00164/qa-colmar-brunton-snap-poll-on-epsom.htm

    That was so good and helpful of them for National

    Not biased on TV anyone?

  17. Instauration 17

    Mea Culpa – sorry.
    Me a Leftie (and residential sphere of consensus x 5) in ECB stragecially voted for Murray to cement ABC (anyone but Colin). Sorry Greg.
    Party vote safe.

    • Instauration 17.1

      But then Murray is not bad !
      I’ve asked him one electorate question and one MFA question in the last term.
      The electorate question was addressed adequately and the MFA question was addressed superbly, including a rebuke of the Department, and website update. (Palestine)
      Both questions were addressed in the Christmas holiday “slow time” – can’t ignore this as an electoralist – even me.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Climate Change: Cold feet?
    Ministry for the Environment has dumped more cabinet papers related to its recent initial consultation on the emissions reduction plan. The key document is an August cabinet paper on Emissions Budgets for 2022-2025, 2026-2030 and 2031-2035, which made the dubious in-principle decision to increase the first period's emissions budget (which ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    48 mins ago
  • Rating The Contenders.
    There Can Be Only One: Some might ask why National MPs would install yet another “successful business person” at the helm of their party? Isn’t one Todd Muller enough? Especially when Simon Bridges could become the first National politician of Māori descent to become Prime Minister.LET’S GET SOMETHING out of ...
    3 hours ago
  • Gordon Campbell on Omicron, and the Bridges/Luxon dilemma
    At this early stage, the Omicron variant seems to be more infectious, and more able to bypass the protection offered by vaccines and by the antibodies generated by previous infection. The fact that it is being spread around the globe by travellers who were all presumably fully immunised and had ...
    4 hours ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 29 November 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Dr Kevin Moore, Associate Professor in Psychology & Tourism, Lincoln University: “For me, the big advantage of NZ Politics Daily is the breadth of opinion and sources it gathers. Together. There is always a mix of news reporting, news analysis, opinion pieces and blog posts. That breadth ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    6 hours ago
  • National is still very much the same Party even without Collins leading it… that’s the real issu...
    Judith Collins regarded Thatcher as “a personal hero” of hers. But like her hero though, it took the UK Conservative Party and their ideological counterparts here to get rid of both of them, from the inside. There’s a sort of bizarre symmetry to that really. Both were rather messy ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    17 hours ago
  • 2021 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #48
    Listing of articles linked to on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, November 21, 2021 through Sat, November 27, 2021 The following articles sparked above average interest during the week: To Breed or Not to Breed?, The Vaccine for Fake News, Ten ways to confront the climate ...
    18 hours ago
  • A professor without honour in his own country
    Michael Corballis just three months before his death appeared in an interview on the Hui with Mihirangi Forbes. She made no effort to conceal her disdain for his defence of science and proceeded to lecture him on not knowing enough about mātauranga Maori to comment on it and accused him ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    18 hours ago
  • Businessman – and Political Novice
    The drums are beating – see Heather Du Plessis-Allan in today’s Herald – for Christopher Luxon’s bid to become National’s new (and latest) leader. It is conceded that he is a political tyro but – such is National’s current plight – it is suggested that he is a risk worth ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    1 day ago
  • No, Elizabeth Stuart Would Not Have Stopped the English Civil War (Probably)
    As you might have noticed, A Phuulish Fellow is a fairly eclectic blog. Even an organic one. I have my interests, and write about them as the fit takes me. And sometimes I stumble across an article I feel the need to comment on. Today, I ran across a ...
    2 days ago
  • Rumour Has It: A Númenórean Character List?
    Today we have another Amazon rumour on our hands. And for a change, it is not coming out of Fellowship of Fans. No, instead we have the following tweet doing the rounds, ostensibly listing (mostly) Númenórean characters and their code names. It’s an interesting leak, if true. And that’s ...
    3 days ago
  • Covid as Warriors
    The book I am currently working on – tentative title ‘In Open Seas’ – looks at the current and future New Zealand. One chapter describes the policy towards Covid using the trope of warfare. It covers an important period in our history but show how policy evolves and why, as ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    3 days ago
  • COVID-19: the B.1.1.529 variant – what do we know?
    There’s a lot of news about a new variant originally reported in southern Africa. Early signs have prompted calls for immediate precautionary blocks on travel from the region to restrict its spread. The WHO has called an emergency conference on this variant. Here’s a round-up of what we know so ...
    SciBlogsBy Grant Jacobs
    3 days ago
  • National Party board denies it unanimously agreed to Collins’ Faustian bargain with Satan
    Sources close to party president Peter Goodfellow say he was totally blindsided by Collins’ claims he was party to this particular satanic ritual. National Party president Peter Goodfellow is today issuing a strong denial on behalf of the party’s board, saying they did not, at any point, agree to the ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    3 days ago
  • The cost of optimism
    Yesterday the National Party imploded in a messy knife-fight that cost it its leader and probably one of the contenders. So naturally, the government has taken the opportunity to do a dump of its pandemic advice, including the Cabinet papers on its controversial decisions to repeatedly lower the Auckland alert ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on National’s less than stellar choices
    Amid all the jostling in the National caucus ranks, spare a thought for Andrew Bayly. Who? Well might you ask. Plucked from obscurity by Judith Collin, elevated from number 18 to number 3 in the caucus rankings and given the Finance portfolio – a role in which he has been ...
    3 days ago
  • Are New Zealand’s universities doing enough to define the limits of academic freedom?
    Matheson Russell, University of Auckland   The news last week that University of Auckland public health researcher Simon Thornley was retracting a co-authored paper about supposed vaccination risks during pregnancy raised deeper questions about the limits of academic freedom. Thornley’s own head of department had called for the paper to ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    3 days ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 26 November 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Jean Drage, Political scientist specialist in local government: “With 78 local authorities and central government currently intent on reform, local government is a challenging area of research to keep on top of. Thank goodness for Bryce’s NZ’s Politics Daily. It is a gem, especially as it also ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    3 days ago
  • Josh Van Veen: Bridges is not the one
    Simon Bridges failed to bluff Judith Collins out of the leadership. A campaign to rehabilitate his image began shortly after the election and culminated in the publication of a memoir in August. There were persistent rumours of a deal with rival Christopher Luxon and MPs from the ‘liberal’ wing of ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    3 days ago
  • Smokefree cars – an important step towards protecting children from the hazards of smoking
    Richard Edwards, Jude Ball, Janet Hoek, George Thomson, Nick Wilson*  On November 28 new legislation to protect children from smoking and vaping in cars will come into force. This blog sets out the background and rationale for the new law, and discusses implementation, evaluation and the next steps to protect ...
    SciBlogsBy Public Health Expert
    3 days ago
  • Judith's Last Stand.
    Going Out With All Guns Blazing: Why didn’t Judith Collins stick with the strategy that had kept her, National’s most improbable of leaders, in power for more than a year? One might just as well ask why Rob Muldoon (that other unforgiving right-wing populist National Party leader) got drunk and ...
    3 days ago
  • Act’s Precarious Ascendancy.
    On The Lookout: It is easy to imagine how closely Seymour has been watching the National Opposition for the slightest sign of a Clark figure emerging. A respected politician, who enjoys broad support across the party and, much more importantly, who impresses the ordinary centre-right voter as having what it ...
    3 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #47, 2021
    104 articles by 574 contributing authors Physical science of climate change, effects Delayed impacts of Arctic sea-ice loss on Eurasian severe cold winters Jang et al. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 10.1029/2021jd035286 Observations of climate change, effects Divergent responses of terrestrial carbon use efficiency to climate variation from 2000 ...
    3 days ago
  • Labour’s Eyes Wide Shut To “Unruly Tenants”.
    Not Seeing The Problem: They say there are none so blind as those who will not see. And, right now, Kāinga Ora is studiously not looking. It is clear to everyone that the Minister responsible, Poto Williams, has (like so many of her colleagues) been entirely captured by her officials. ...
    3 days ago
  • Is the mob coming for Charles Darwin?
    Richard Dawkins recently noted the giants of the past are being sanctimoniously judged by nonentities of the present whose only qualification is still being alive to do so. How will the future judge our own time when we are not around? Peter Franklin from Unherd examines whether the woke can ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    4 days ago
  • Blowing a Hole in Your Own Wall: Idiotic Tampering with MIQ
    Managed Isolation/Quarantine has been a fact of life for New Zealand for eighteen months. It’s not popular – there are only so many spaces available at any given time, and the process is famously opaque – but it is the key to saving New Zealand from rampant Coronavirus. That, ...
    4 days ago
  • Now Labour wants secret trials
    Today, the government introduced the Security Information in Proceedings Legislation Bill to the House. The Bill would allow the government to use classified information in civil or criminal proceedings and keep it secret from the other party. So people suing the government for human rights abuses could lose, and defendants ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • The end of a toxic leader
    If there's one thing that Judith Collins is usually good at, it's using scandalous information about other people to her advantage. Not above undermining her own political party, Collins has been known to even leak against her own fellow MPs, particularly those who posed a threat to her as the ...
    4 days ago
  • A transformative government in Germany
    Back in September Germans went to the polls, and handed the politicians a tough job, with no easy majorities for anyone. The Social Democrats, Free Democrats, and Greens agreed to work together in a "traffic light" coalition, but given their political differences (its basicly ACT/Greens/Labour), expectations for real change were ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Political Harakiri
    The National party must always have known that they were taking a risk when they elected Judith Collins as leader. There were, after all, good reasons why they repeatedly declined to accept her candidature when she offered herself – as she frequently did. She was always an inappropriate person to ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    4 days ago
  • Thanksgiving advice, 2021: How to deal with climate change-denying Uncle Pete
    This is a re-post from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists by Richard Somerville “Birds of a feather flock together,” so I am sure that nearly all of those reading this article accept the main findings of climate science. Yet many people don’t. Instead, they believe a variety of climate ...
    4 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on the demotion of Simon Bridges
    So Simon Bridges has been bounced from the front bench and stripped of his shadow portfolio responsibilities for the crudely “inappropriate” comments that he allegedly made to a female colleague, Jacqui Dean – and personally apologised for – about five years ago. After years of mocking Labour for its supposed ...
    4 days ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 25 November 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Dr Rosemary Wette, Associate Professor, Applied Linguistics, University of Auckland: “I’ve been browsing regularly through NZ Politics Daily for several months now. It gives me access to a range of views on current issues (helpfully organised by topic) that I wouldn’t otherwise have time to look up, or ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    4 days ago
  • The bizarre case of the Royal Society investigating academics defending science
    The Royal Society has begun a disciplinary investigation against a group of academics. The academics were defending science and in the past would have expected support from the Royal Society. The Free Speech Union has launched a campaign to defend the academics and academic freedom. Māori professor under investigation for ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    5 days ago
  • Ian Powell: Unionism and nursing in New Zealand
    In the around 35 years I worked for unions (over 30 with the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists and earlier with the New Zealand Educational Institute) I often cogitated over the distinction between unions and unionism. They are intertwined but not inseparable. I associate unionism with collective consciousness able to ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    5 days ago
  • Bryce Edwards: Today’s constitutional disgrace in Parliament
    This Government has a problem with urgency. Critics from both left and right have long complained about their lack of urgency on issues such as climate change, housing, and inequality. Likewise, in terms of the Covid response, there’s been a chorus of criticism that Labour has been complacent and sluggish ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    5 days ago
  • Vaping needs much tighter regulation as we approach Smokefree Aotearoa 2025: Two new studies
    Nick Wilson, Janet Hoek, Jennifer Summers, Driss Ait Ouakrim, Andrew Waa, Richard Edwards, Tony Blakely* Two recent studies provide new insights into the impact vaping may have on public health. The first estimates that use of modern vaping devices could be around a third as harmful to health as smoking. ...
    SciBlogsBy Public Health Expert
    5 days ago
  • Strange Defeat: A Guest Post By Dr. Chris Harris.
    They Did Things Differently Then: And we might still be doing things differently, if the world these "Country Lads" were fighting for, and which endured for nearly 30 years after World War II, had not been supplanted by the world we inhabit now. In spite of its reality, New Zealand's ...
    5 days ago
  • More than 147km – the transformative potential of the Wellington bike network plan
    Feature image by Luke Pilkinton-Ching, University of Otago Wellington   Caroline Shaw, Anja Mizdrak, Ryan Gage* Wellington City Council is currently consulting on a cycle network for Wellington. This is a big deal. WCC are proposing a 147km cycle network around the city, the vast majority of which is new. ...
    SciBlogsBy Public Health Expert
    5 days ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 24 November 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Liz Brown, Senior communications advisor, Association of Salaried Medical Specialists: “The NZ Politics Daily is a fabulous resource providing a comprehensive one stop shop on what’s making news and how stories are being covered. I look forward to seeing it pop into my inbox every morning.” Anyone can sign ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    5 days ago
  • Climate Change: Taking us for a ride
    Agricultural emissions has been an oozing sore in our climate change policy for over a decade. Exempted from the ETS in 2008, farmers were meant to be brought in and start paying for their emissions in 2012. Of course, National put a stop to that, and exempted them forever. When ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Climate Change: An industry in denial
    Over the past few years it has become clear that coal has no future in Aotearoa. Rising carbon prices, a ban on new boilers and a legislated phase-out for existing infrastructure are going to drive it out of the market. To reinforce this, the government signed up for an anti-coal ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • The “most open and transparent government ever” again
    The government is about to pass new vaccination mandate legislation under urgency. So obviously, they'd want to ensure it gets the best possible scrutiny in the limited time available by releasing the supporting policy documents, right? Of course not: On the eve of legislation to enable vaccination passes being ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on farmers playing the victim, plus Chile’s right turn
    Among the farming lobby groups, the good cop/bad cop routine has been working a treat. It suits Federated Farmers to keep daylight between itself and the Groundswell movement. Month in, year out the Federation continues to engage with the government over the very same water degradation/climate change regulations that Groundswell ...
    6 days ago
  • Important People
    The Herald has returned to form with a vengeance. In today’s issue, Barry Soper snipes at Jacinda’s handling of her regular press conferences. It seems that she did not give him an early chance to ask his very important question and took no account of his need to depart immediately ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    6 days ago
  • Parliament, the Courts and the end of three strikes (for now)
    Last week, Parliament embarked on the process of repealing the so-called “three strikes” provisions in the Sentencing Act 2002. Given that Labour, the Greens and Te Paati Māori all supported this repeal Bill at first reading (and that NZ First no longer is in government to block the move), three strikes’ eventual legislative demise seems ...
    PunditBy Andrew Geddis
    6 days ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 23 November 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Martyn Bradbury, Editor, The Daily Blog “’NZ Politics Daily’ is one of the most important news and political resources run in New Zealand. The expert collation of opinion and news makes it an invaluable day to day resource as well as an incredible treasure for researchers in the future. ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    6 days ago
  • New Zealand’s Emission Reduction Plan
    By Paul Callister and Robert McLachlan Fifty years ago, on 26 November 1971, the film “Notes on a New Zealand City: Wellington”, directed by Paul Maunder, premiered on Wellington TV. The narrator asks if Wellington’s future will involve suburban sprawl, traffic, motorways, suburban shopping malls, and the decentralization of employment; ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    6 days ago
  • Dissing The Farmers.
    Neale vs The Revolting Farmers: One has to admire the way Capital Government Relations CEO, Neale Jones, covers-off all the bases of the current political zeitgeist. In a masterfully composed tweet, he lambasts the Groundswell protesters as sexists, racists and reactionaries, clinging for dear life to “a purely extractive economic ...
    6 days ago
  • How will carbon pricing impact inflation?
    This is a re-post from the Citizens' Climate Lobby blog Inflation — the decline of purchasing power as prices rise — is currently at its highest level in 30 years. This has led to concern among the public and policymakers about the rising costs of many important products like food, shelter, gasoline, ...
    7 days ago
  • (Lack of) Public Service Announcement: The National Library of New Zealand, Internet Archive, and Al...
    The National Library of New Zealand has not covered itself in glory in recent times. The decision to axe most of the Overseas Collection (some 600,000 books) in order to make way for more New Zealand items (which it collects already, and which amounts to some 3,000 items ...
    7 days ago
  • Game over for the HRPP
    Since its election loss earlier this year, Samoa's Human Rights Protection Party has been pinning its hopes on the upcoming by-elections to regain power. That was a pretty forlorn hope - with 18 seats, they would have had to win all seven by-elections and have two additional women appointed to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    7 days ago
  • Chinese influence and American hate diffusion.
    Over the last decade concerns have been raised about Chinese “influence operations” in NZ and elsewhere. Run by CCP-controlled “United Front” organisations, influence operations are designed to promote PRC interests and pro-PRC views within the economic and political elites of the targeted country as well as Chinese diaspora communities. The ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    7 days ago
  • The Real Interests Of The Country.
    Off Message: Into the extremely fraught relationship between Town and Country, the Groundswell organisers have blundered like an Aberdeen-Angus steer in an organic vege-shop. Unreasonably proud of their rural economic virtues, and dangerously forthright in their enumeration of the cities’ political vices, these Kiwi equivalents of America’s “good ole boys” ...
    1 week ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 22 November 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Minna Reid, Law student, Victoria University of Wellington “As a Uni student, staying up to date with current affairs is always important. The Daily Politics & Democracy Project by Bryce Edwards is of great service for this. It offers varying news sources I would not have found myself ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    1 week ago
  • Free speech is a people’s frank confession to itself
    by Daphna Whitmore The government is devising new “Hate Speech” laws to save New Zealand from something that has not been defined. When asked what is hate speech the Prime Minister replied “You know it when you see it”. The Human Rights Commission is supporting the law change and sees ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • 2021 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #47
    Listing of articles linked to on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, November 14, 2021 through Sat, November 20, 2021 The following articles sparked above average interest during the week: Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheeple? A.I. Maps 20 Years of Climate Conspiracies, COP Negotiators Demand Nations ...
    1 week ago
  • The F Words, by Barbara Gregorich
    Book review Barbara Gregorich is a writer and long time anti-capitalist in the US. She and her husband were interviewed for Redline about the social movements of the 1960s. Her latest book The F Words, has been reviewed by Guy Miller for Redline. The F Words by Barbara Gregorich bears ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • The Scourge of the Aimless Kick
    The below-par All Black performance against France was – sadly – afflicted, again, by what has become a feature of New Zealand rugby – the scourge of the aimless kick. It is surely a truism that, to win a rugby match, you must have the ball. But time and time ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    1 week ago
  • Delta Rocks Gibraltar: Lessons to be learned from Covid-19’s global resurgence.
    Hard To Beat: Perhaps the most important lesson to be drawn from what is happening in Gibraltar is that vaccination is not a magic bullet. Yes, it makes it harder to contract the virus, and significantly ameliorates its worst effects, but it does not confer absolute immunity to Covid-19 – ...
    1 week ago
  • I’ll take the masks and vaccines, thank you
    From Stuff:I don't want to be pedantic, but I'm pretty sure neither masks nor vaccines figure much in the Gospel of Saint John; nor has Jesus shown much efficacy in protecting people from anything. ...
    1 week ago
  • Hell To Pay: The alarming similarities between the Anti-Vaccination Movement and the creators of the...
    Never Let Go: If the violent prejudices of the Jim Crow South, echoing through contemporary struggles, teach us anything, it is that the defence of rationality, science and progressivism must never be allowed to falter. Those pre-modern night-riders, filled with unrelenting hate, are still out there. If the troops of ...
    1 week ago
  • A Peak Out of Auckland? + Other Covid Musings
    At last, we have some cause for optimism out of Auckland’s interminable Covid outbreak. Knowing our luck, it might be a false dawn… but there are some signs that we have seen the peak:
    1 week ago
  • Sing Song about Hard Times
    Celebrating Poet Anne KennedyThe 2021 Prime Minister's Award for Literary Achievement for Poetry went to Anne Kennedy. I have enjoyed her work since her first collection Sing Song. The poems’ setting is in the domestic life of a family of four, told from the mother’s perspective: moving house, the gruelling ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    1 week ago
  • A good problem to have
    Norway is the global success story on electric car uptake, with early policy and a well-signalled 2025 cutoff point for fossil vehicles resulting in 77% of new cars being EV's. But now they have a problem: not enough dirty cars to tax: Norway’s electric dream has been credited to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Gordon Campbell on the politics of anger, plus a music playlist
    Angry? Are you talkin’ to ME? Of late, the Code Red levels of resentment inspired by the government’s Covid policy almost make one hanker for the days when people could write best-selling books about New Zealanders being The Passionless People. Not anymore. A hissy fit arms race seems to be ...
    1 week ago
  • No, vaccinated people are not ‘just as infectious’ as unvaccinated people if they get COVID
    Jack Feehan, Victoria University and Vasso Apostolopoulos, Victoria University   Some recent studies have shown similar peak viral loads in vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated people who contract COVID. This has raised concerns for the efficacy of vaccines for preventing transmission. How concerned should we be? Are vaccinated people just ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • Electric cars alone won’t save the planet. We’ll need to design cities so people can walk and cy...
    Timothy Welch, University of Auckland   At the COP26 climate summit, world politicians patted themselves on their backs for coming to a last-minute agreement. Humanity now waits with bated breath to see if countries implement the commitments they made, and if those commitments help the planet. If the rest of ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • Worn down by bad news? You’re not alone…
    Feature image: The weight of the world’s news can be too much. (Shutterstock) Neill Fitzpatrick, MacEwan University In 1983, Canada’s Anne Murray released another hit song. This one, though, was different than what her fans were accustomed to. A Little Good News is a sombre ballad summarizing the mood of ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • Alexander Gillespie, University of Waikato   Last week’s COVID protest outside parliament served as a warning that New Zealand is not immune to the kinds of anger seen overseas. As Labour Party whip Kieran McAnulty put it, “I think everyone needs to be aware that things are starting to escalate.” ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • NZ Politics Daily: 19 November 2021
    Today’s NZPD testimonial from Brendon Burns, Marlborough-based communications consultant, former Christchurch MP “Politics Daily is simply the best go-to summary of everything in and around central and local government and much more besides. Compulsory daily reading.” Anyone can sign up to NZPD for free at: https://democracyproject.nz/nz-politics-daily/ Today’s content Govt management of Delta outbreak Michael ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    1 week ago
  • Buying Back The Whenua.
    Dangerous Visionaries: Rex Connor wanted to “buy back the farm” (i.e. nationalise Australia’s mineral wealth) and ended up bringing down the government of Gough Whitlam. Nanaia Mahuta’s Three Waters Project is seen by many as a first step to “buying back the whenua” (repatriating Māori lands and waters). A policy which threatens the longevity of ...
    1 week ago
  • nuremberg, and history
      There’s a lot been said recently about the Nuremberg code. So what is it, and why is it popping up now? As described in this excellent NEJM article, the Code was developed over 80 years ago in August 1947, by judges involved in the “Doctors Trial” at Nuremberg. There were ...
    SciBlogsBy Alison Campbell
    2 weeks ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #46, 2021
    Housekeeping: New content New Research is primarily focused on reports published in "the academic literature." Thanks to a diversity of publishers, journals, editors, reviewers, researchers and institutional affiliations, such publications are statistically highly successful at approximating and reflecting our best dispassionate understanding of research topics. Any given personal agenda not ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Another OIA horror-story
    NewsHub reports on another OIA horror story, a simple request for information on the supply and distribution of PPE which required the intervention of the Ombudsman to get a response. And reading the article, it seems to be the usual story of an overly-secretive agency abusing the process to hide ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Bribing for convictions
    Imagine that you've been arrested and are facing criminal charges. Now imagine that the government tries to bribe your lawyer to encourage you to plead guilty. It's obviously corrupt and a complete mockery of justice. But that's exactly what the New Zealand Government wants to do: The Criminal Process ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago

  • New Ambassador to Russia announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of Sarah Walsh as New Zealand’s next Ambassador to Russia. “Aotearoa New Zealand and Russia have a long-standing relationship, engaging on a range of regional and global interests including disarmament and Antarctica issues. We also work together as members of the East ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • New Permanent Representative to the UN announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of Carolyn Schwalger as Permanent Representative to the New Zealand Permanent Mission to the United Nations in New York. “Aotearoa New Zealand is a founding member of the UN and we have worked hard to ensure our stance on human rights, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Further COVID-19 economic support for Cook Islands and Fiji announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced a further package of support for the Cook Islands and Fiji for COVID-19 economic support and recovery. “Aotearoa New Zealand remains committed to supporting our Pacific fanau and vuvale to respond to the impacts of COVID-19 on their economies, and move towards long-term ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    24 hours ago
  • New law will clear the air for tamariki in vehicles
    From today, it’s illegal to smoke or vape in most vehicles carrying children aged under 18 years old - whether the vehicle is moving or not. “Second-hand smoke poses an unacceptable risk to our tamariki and rangatahi,” Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall said. “We know children in vehicles ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Nine countries designated very high risk
    Nine southern African countries are being added to the very high risk countries list following public health advice around the newly discovered COVID-19 variant Omicron, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said. This afternoon, a public health risk assessment was carried out to assess the emerging evidence and any risk to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Foreign Affairs Minister concludes final stage of world trip
    Foreign Affairs Minister Hon Nanaia Mahuta today departed North America to return home to Aotearoa, concluding the last stage of her 17-day world trip. The final leg of her trip saw her visit the United States of America and Canada for a number of high-level discussions. While in Washington D.C., ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Milestone launch of Pacific Languages Unit
    Today’s official launch of the Pacific Languages Unit is a milestone for our Pacific communities, the Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio said. The Pacific Languages Unit brings together a new set of language supports within the Ministry for Pacific Peoples to provide advice, commission research, maintain standards, promote ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Public Health Lecture – University of Otago
    Public Health - Lessons from New Zealand’s COVID-19 response and opportunities for the future E nga mana, E nga reo,                                          E nga iwi. Tēna koutou katoa. Ka huri ki nga mana whenua o te rohe nei. Tēna koutou. He mihi hoki ki a tatou kua tau mai nei I raro I ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New Zealand statement on situation in Honiara, Solomon Islands
    Aotearoa New Zealand is deeply concerned by the events which have been unfolding in Honiara, Solomon Islands, since Wednesday. “New Zealand is a long-standing partner of Solomon Islands, and there are deep and enduring connections between our two countries,” Acting Foreign Affairs Minister David Parker said. “Our engagement in Solomon ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Nailed it! Over 500 apprentices get jobs boost
    Over 500 apprentices and cadets have been placed into work across New Zealand thanks to the Government’s booming build programme, that’s both constructing public houses, and maintaining older homes. Housing Minister Megan Woods announced the milestone today at a public housing construction site in Riccarton, Christchurch. “This Government’s investment in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Investment to support maternal mental health
    Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall has announced an investment to help expand maternal mental health services in five District Health Boards. “Supporting parent’s mental wellbeing during their child’s first 1000 days, from conception to two years of age, is critical to the long-term emotional, mental and physical wellbeing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Workplace vaccination requirements extended to cover Police and NZ Defence Force
    With the support of the organisations, additional vaccination requirements will cover sworn members, recruits and authorised officers of the New Zealand Police, and all New Zealand Defence Force staff. First doses of the vaccine for workers in these organisations are required by 17 January 2022, and second doses by 1 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Aotearoa New Zealand and Canada to pursue greater Indigenous collaboration
    During her visit to Ottawa, the Honourable Nanaia Mahuta, New Zealand Minister of Foreign Affairs and Associate Minister for Māori Development, met with the Honourable Patty Hajdu, Canadian Minister of Indigenous Services, and the Honourable Marc Miller, Canadian Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations, to further expand and develop the positive relationship ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Māori vaccination rates reach 80% first dose
    Associate Minister of Health (Māori) Hon Peeni Henare today confirmed that Māori across the motu have now reached 80 percent for first doses of the COVID-19 vaccination nationally. “We have seen a huge increase in vaccinations for Māori throughout November, since the beginning of the month the increase for first ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Subsequent Children legislation to change
    The Government has today introduced legislation that will reverse provisions in the Oranga Tamariki Act as part of a path to rebuild trust and confidence in the organisation. “The Oranga Tamariki Amendment Bill makes a number of changes but by far the most important is the partial repeal of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Security Information in Proceedings Legislation Bill introduced to Parliament
    The Minister of Justice has confirmed the introduction of the Security Information in Proceedings Legislation Bill to Parliament. National security information is information which, if disclosed, would be likely to prejudice New Zealand’s security, defence, or international relations. “This Bill adds to the Government’s work to strengthen New Zealand’s protections ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Shortcomings revealed in power cut investigation
    No household should have had their power disconnected 18 recommendations, mostly EA and Transpower related The EA must strengthen its oversight of the system operator An investigation into power cuts that left more than 34,000 households without electricity on one of the coldest nights of the year has found that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • COVID-19 Protection Framework supported by new testing and contact tracing strategy
    Wider use of rapid antigen testing from 1 December Increasing daily laboratory capacity to 60,000 PCR tests Q1 2022 A new national telehealth case investigation service with 475 investigators A nearly $1 billion investment in testing, contact tracing and case investigation A new national testing strategy will provide better protection ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Supporting New Zealanders to recover from COVID-19 in the community
    $300 million boost to Pharmac to buy new medicines to treat COVID-19 Care in the Community approach will see most cases receive initial contact from a healthcare provider wiithin 24 hours Support pack provided within 48 hours Regular health checks throughout recovery The Government is increasing the support for New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Additional support for people isolating at home
    New regional MSD COVID-19 welfare teams to coordinate social service support for those isolating at home Regional teams working alongside other government agencies, iwi/Māori and community providers for housing, food and income support Government investment of $204.1m into welfare system support for Care in the Community Minister for Social Development ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Tax bill provides vital support for families
    A boost to Working for Families tax credits, as part of a package of financial support that will see 346,000 families better off, has been passed into law late last night.  Revenue Minister David Parker said the measures would lift the incomes of those receiving the Family Tax Credit, the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New text service to support disabled peoples’ vaccinations
    Efforts to support disabled peoples’ vaccinations go from strength-to-strength with the launch of a new text service, Minister for Disability Issues Carmel Sepuloni announced today. The service, run by Whakarongorau Aotearoa on behalf of the Ministry of Health, is in response to feedback from the disability community and is an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Proactive Calendar Release – October 2021
    ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Pacific community reach vaccination milestone
    Pacific communities across the nation have rolled up their sleeves and played their part to reach a major vaccination milestone, 90 percent  have now had their first vaccination, Aupito William Sio, Minister for Pacific Peoples and Associate Minister of Health said. “Reaching this milestone reflects the work Pacific Health Providers ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Reconnecting New Zealand – the next steps
    Fully vaccinated Kiwis and other eligible travellers can travel to NZ from Australia without staying in MIQ from 11.59pm Sunday, 16 January 2022 Fully vaccinated Kiwis and other eligible travellers can travel to NZ from all other countries from 11.59pm Sunday, 13 February 2022 All fully vaccinated individuals will be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Shot in the arm for Canterbury tourism
    A brand new tourism attraction launched in the Canterbury high country is designed to transform the regional economy from seasonal peaks and troughs of past visitor trends. Regional Economic Development and Tourism Minister Stuart Nash has officially opened the Ōpuke Pools at Methven, which received government backing from the Provincial ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Combined efforts connecting locals to nature
    A Government investment in six community and iwi-led projects across the Hawke’s Bay district will provide nature-based jobs for more than 60 locals, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. “Combined, these projects are contributing to a really ambitious conservation effort across the region, while at the same time up-skilling and offering ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Empowering Diverse Communities
    Minister for the Prevention of Family Violence and Sexual Violence Marama Davidson has approved five funding grants to support national-level family violence and sexual violence prevention initiatives for LGBTQIA+ people, disabled people, older people and new migrant communities. “Local community initiatives are a key lever in reducing violence. The Government ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Moriori Claims Settlement Bill passes Third Reading
    The Moriori Claims Settlement Bill has passed its third reading at Parliament, marking the completion of the historical Treaty of Waitangi settlement process for Moriori. “This is the final milestone for Moriori and the Crown and is a new beginning in our relationship,” Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Andrew ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Permanent drug-checking law passed and new providers appointed
    Drug-checking services will continue to operate legally at festivals, pop-up clinics, university orientation weeks and other places this summer and beyond, thanks to a law passed today, Health Minister Andrew Little says. The services have been legal since last summer under temporary legislation that expires next month. The Government’s Drug ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Pacific communities supported to transition to the COVID-19 Protection Framework
    The Government has agreed to support Pacific health providers and communities’ transition to the new COVID-19 Protection Framework, Minister for Pacific Peoples and Associate Minister of Health, Aupito William Sio said. The Government recognises that there is a clear need to prepare new systems and healthcare approaches, to protect and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government helps Pasifika Festivals to ride the COVID wave
    As we transition into a new way of managing COVID and take steps towards giving vaccinated New Zealanders more freedoms to enjoy Aotearoa’s arts and culture, 19 Pasifika festivals across the motu are receiving funding through the Pasifika Festivals Initiative, Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Carmel Sepuloni said. These ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Tech ready for businesses and events to open up for summer
    Businesses and events will be set for summer, with the free NZ Pass Verifier app to scan and verify My Vaccine Passes now available to download, Minister for COVID-19 Response Chris Hipkins said today. “New Zealand will move into the traffic light system (COVID-19 Protection Framework) from Friday 3 December, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Govt providing business the tools to vaccinate workforces
    Simplified vaccination assessment tool will be able to be used mid-December to help employers decide if they would require vaccination for different types of work. Workers covered by the My Vaccine Pass mandate need to have their first dose by 3 December and be fully vaccinated by 17 January 2022. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • The talanoa about the future of our Pacific Languages
    A ground-breaking survey launched today will give researchers valuable insights into the state of Pacific languages in Aotearoa, said the Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio. The Leo Moana o Aotearoa Pacific Languages Survey is part of a wider project that will support the revitalisation, and sustainability of Te ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Foreign Minister concludes successful visit to the United Arab Emirates and Qatar
    Foreign Affairs Minister Hon Nanaia Mahuta departed the Middle East today for Washington DC, concluding a successful visit to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Qatar. Her visit to the UAE saw her host New Zealand’s most important event at Expo 2020, Te Aratini, and meet with Emirati leaders including ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Govt to review high cost of residential building supplies in market study
    Ensuring Kiwis have access to fairly priced building materials is a driving factor in Government’s decision to review the residential building supply market, Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, David Clark, announced today. “We’re looking at how we can lay the foundations for a more competitive building sector,” David Clark ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech to NZ Sepsis Conference 2021
    E nga mana, E nga reo, E nga iwi, Tēna kotou katoa. Ka huri ki nga mana whenua o te rohe nei. Tēna koutou. He mihi hoki ki a tatou kua tau mai nei I raro I te kaupapa o te rā. No reira tēna koutou katoa. Opening It’s a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Centre for the Child to be established in Tā Wira Gardiner’s name
    A research centre dedicated to improving the lives and wellbeing of tamariki is to be established within Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiarangi in recognition of Tā Wira Gardiner’s contributions to society. The Minister for Children, Hon Kelvin Davis made the announcement with Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiarangi at an event ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government funding supports new iwi led housing in Ōpōtiki
    Government funding to support iwi led housing development New iwi housing development supports Ōpōtiki whānau Seeing another deserving whānau move into a warm dry home is a further positive step forward for this Government’s Housing strategy, says Associate Minister of Housing (Māori Housing) Peeni Henare. “It’s fantastic to be here ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago