Written By:
- Date published:
10:39 am, September 30th, 2024 - 19 comments
Categories: uncategorized -
Tags:
Last week was a big week in politics.
The Government did a number of things each of which was deeply disturbing and deeply detrimental to our country.
They included:
But the most disturbing news was the introduction of the Government’s bill allowing for offsea oil and gas drilling to be reintroduced. And the kicker was that citizens will have only have five days from that date to submit on the bill. Citizenship involvement in the formulation of law is clearly not something of importance to this Government.
Its justification for the change was contained in this speech from Shane Jones during the Bill’s introduction:
Our Government inherited a dire situation where gas supply has been tight, and demand grossly exceeds supply. Why does this situation exist? It exists because of an ideological urge to reject the value of an indigenous resource in New Zealand called natural gas that represents a key contingency fuel that offers security to New Zealand’s energy system; an irrational belief that this valuable resource represents a threat to New Zealand’s reputation, New Zealand’s stamina economically. Our Government rejects that ideological clap trap.
In response Megan Woods summarised the bill well:
I am not going to spend the time of my speech reminding those on the opposite benches of the large body of climate science that tells us about the need to keep oil and gas in the ground—I’m taking that as a given. And I’m assuming members opposite actually do engage in that literature. But I am going to spend my time in this speech talking about how today signifies a time when the three parties of this Government firmly plant in the ground their backwards-looking plan that is no plan. All three parties in this coalition are showing their true colours today. They will be judged by their actions for generations to come. This is a bill that certainly does not put New Zealand first; it puts New Zealand at risk. This bill is quite simply climate denying, populist, right-wing virtue signalling.
Steve Abel from the Greens said this about the “inconvenience” of climate change:
If we are to have a future on this planet, the oil and gas industry and the coal industry must have no future. Now, is it convenient to transition our energy system from the means by which we have powered most of the world for the last 200 years? No, it is not convenient. Is it something we do for a laugh? No, it is not something we do for a laugh. It is something we do because the science of climate change—which the other side of the House are in rabid denial of—tells us that we have to move away from oil, gas, and coal.
And this:
It’s interesting that the party that wants to vandalise the functional viability of the atmosphere on which all humanity and, in fact, all life on Earth depends, by continuing to pollute it with carbon dioxide, is calling those of us who want to stop the destruction of the viability of life on Earth the vandals. In fact, that’s exactly what we’re here to do: to stop the vandalism.
The bill itself is more than a simple repeal of the drilling ban. It makes a number of changes. Gold mining on the foreshore would be permitted. Conservation land in Taranaki can now be investigated for exploitation.
One of the more complex and more worrying provisions is to remove the obligation for a permit or licence holder to take out an approved security to pay for decommissioning costs. More flexibility as approved by the Minister is to be allowed. Given that Shane Jones wanted the State to pay compensation if drilling rights were cancelled by a future Government you can imagine that he would be something of a pushover in negotiations with oil companies.
Also the previous government had expanded liability for decomissioning costs to include all former permit holders. The current proposal is that this be changed to include the prior permit holder only.
These are issues that need to be carefully worked through as the potential costs to the country are huge. Five days is not enough time to analyse them properly.
The change in philosophy is highlighted by a simple tweak to the purpose statement in the Act. Instead of the Government managing prospecting, exploration and mining of Crown owned minerals for the benefit of New Zealand it will in the future promote those activities under the bill.
If you want to make a submission this page has the details.
If you want to you may wish to say:
And just remember. Submissions have to be filed no later than 11:59 pm tomorrow night, Tuesday October 1.
Tell them to think about our grandchildren’s future. And how their climate denying, populist, right-wing virtue signalling performative art is not what we need in the middle of a climate crisis.
What I would like to see is the opposition clearly state that this bill will be repealed immediately on regaining the treasury benches.
Make it clear that there is no future in exploration in Aotearoa.
The Greens and TPM will be very clear that's what they'll do. The trouble is Labour hasn't got the balls…not this Labour party.
Swarbrick has announced that the GP would repeal these permits, if elected.
https://www.greens.org.nz/green_government_will_revoke_oil_and_gas_permits
They may or may not get support from Labour in this political stance. Yet to see anything from the Labour party committing to repealing permits. They've said it's a bad idea, but not said they'd reverse it.
https://www.labour.org.nz/release_oil_and_gas_must_stay_in_the_ground
Done!
Done!
Done. Not for my grandkids – don't have any children, But for other people's grandkids.
Micky's guidelines were useful.
Me done too.
Meanwhile..
Except …. perhaps if they tethered a pipeline to the current "minister" there would be an immediate supply of gas and wind from the pompous nincompoop. He ventilates constantly.
Macro.
Haha, yes and the amount of politicians around the world that this renewable energy source would work on would make NZ a world leader!
Mainzeal or Mainfreight in the link?
Feck I have done this twice. Will correct.
Thanks for the submission tips/advice – done.
Shane Jones…..5 days? Our mandate and legitimacy comes from the election campaign.
Well….yea. Some of us saw it . Stood out like dogs bollocks.
No alternative? Liar !
And the advice? (which like Health etc they ignore..cause Dino thinkers)
Stand Up ! Push back !
NZ produced roughly 5.4% of its electricity from coal in the 10 years between 2014-2023.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/715879/new-zealand-coal-electricity-generation/#:~:text=New%20Zealand%20uses%20coal%20as,coalfields%20located%20throughout%20the%20country.
Given the mass of renewables coming online in the next few years, including the largest solar plant in NZ given consent yesterday (three times as big as any previous NZ solar site) this very small level of coal usage really isn't a problem, and it will reduce further soon.
I follows that NZ certainly doesn't need to invest in facilities to import gas-that would be stupid, as is National's bill to enable prospecting for gas.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/529428/consent-granted-for-large-solar-power-station-at-ruakaka-in-northland
done
done
Advice? NACT1 don't need no frickin advice…..
Trade Minister Todd McClay : is he frickin serious? ( I bypassed Jones wank comment..more than enough of him already )
.. NZ's best Environmental Interests ? And our World image ?
NACT1 off on a wild goose gas chase….all for what?
Submitted- thanks for advice.