Sunday Reading

11 comments on “Sunday Reading ”

• Comments are now closed

1. joe90 1

   9 September 2012 at 10:03 am

   http://newleftreview.org/II/76/jan-breman-the-undercities-of-karachi

   http://www.guernicamag.com/interviews/reporting-poverty/

   http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0203.coates.html

   Easier Than Taking Vitamins

   Still Separate and Unequal

   Eddie is Gone
2. Colonial Viper 2

   9 September 2012 at 10:16 am

   *Shakes head* The Black President thing is a complete misdirection. The basics are that he’s continued GW’s direction lock stock and barrel.

   Obama has kept Guantanamo Bay open. Has expanded the use of drone assassinations. Has signed into law provisions allowing the targetting of US citizens for killing, indefinite detention without trial, and approved warrantless interception of every US citizens communications. Prosecutions of whistle blowers are numerous. Banks continue to be given huge sums of money at massively favourable terms while the US unemployment rating nears 12% real.

   Even as the American middle class collapses, the following chart of Smith and Wesson’s financial performance says it all.

   http://www.zerohedge.com/news/chart-day-smith-wesson-sales?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29
   • joe90 2.1

     9 September 2012 at 11:11 am

     Dow Jones up 60% since Obama took office.

     http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/jun/01/scorecard-economy-obama/
     • mike e 2.1.1

       9 September 2012 at 12:32 pm

       Dow jones is showing how the global corporations are benefiting while the US stagnates, Most of the stagnation is caused by they layoff of govt jobs to pay for wars and wall st bailout.
       The private sector is cruising along nicely but outsourcing any real growth.
   • mike e 2.2

     9 September 2012 at 12:29 pm

     Obama is just a figurehead the republicans and the right wing democrat fundamentalists have control of the house and senate so all Obama has is the veto which he has to play very carefully.
     The lack of voter turn out suits the right wing to no end so they play every dirty trick in the book when it comes to disenfranchising the poor.
     • rosy 2.2.1

       9 September 2012 at 4:30 pm

       Despite the election being a fight between a Republican party and psuedo-Republican party I thought this paragraph shows promise if this really is what the Democrats are aiming for (my bold)

       …a party once derided for playing interest-group politics showed no hesitancy about going down that road in Charlotte. The convention was full of obvious appeals to women, gays, blacks, Hispanics, young people and, in the constant references to the successful bailout of the US car industry, organised labour. These are the groups that form the backbone of the Democratic coalition and are essential to the party’s long-term success.

       A coalition of disparate interest groups, because in the end, if they are of the left, their interests coincide.
   • Dr Terry 2.3

     9 September 2012 at 1:42 pm

     CV you cite unpleasant, but true, facts concerning the Obama reign. His main attribute is an amazing gift for oratory (or rhetoric, if you prefer). I was thrilled to see a black man elected, but being black does not put one beyond all criticism. The US has little choice, really, between Obama and Romney. All I can think is that a Romney administration might be somewhat worse, if that is possible (reverting to days of dear old George Bush?) There is only a choice between one man of the right, and another in an American election. (Remember the militaristic manner in which Obama hastened to sent many more troops to Afghanistan?) Whichever becomes President, Key will hurry to do obeisance, doubtless with a preference for Romney.
     • Draco T Bastard 2.3.1

       9 September 2012 at 5:01 pm

       All I can think is that a Romney administration might be somewhat worse, if that is possible (reverting to days of dear old George Bush?)

       IMO, a Romney administration will be a hell of a lot worse.

       Whichever becomes President, Key will hurry to do obeisance, doubtless with a preference for Romney.

       QFT
3. Dr Terry 3

   9 September 2012 at 2:07 pm

   “Dr Tim Foresman has some harsh words for Kiwis and their car obsession”. How right this is, Kiwis are practically married to their cars (yet fuss about same sex marriage!!) To lose one’s car would be tantamount to losing a limb (which some might prefer). Not only that, but for the most part cars carry a single occupant, the driver. People would do well to avoid taking for-granted their private means of transport. I see that they do (as I once did), for now I am unable to drive and own no car. Most probably has no idea what a handicap this is.

   I reside in a community unit for retired folk. Nearly every person in my street possesses a car (how they afford this, I do not know!) Still clinging to their vehicles are the very old, sick, nearly blind, lame and crippled. Obviously, virtually anybody can renew a driver’s license without a problem. Seldom is a ride offered to one unlucky enough not to have his/her own means of transport.

   Addictions take many forms!
4. Draco T Bastard 4

   9 September 2012 at 8:00 pm

   http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1209/S00031/transport-its-the-economy-stupid.htm

   It is ironic therefore that the majority of transport funding in this country is so tightly controlled at the central government level. Local cities and districts can talk all they like about what they and their residents would like to see for transport in their area, but they are ultimately beholden to the whims of the government of the day.

   And so it is that the latest National Land Transport Programme (NLTP) just released (The Press, 30 Aug) continues to propose a distribution of funding that appears to be at odds with the wishes of the general population, and also best-practice international evidence.
5. Draco T Bastard 5

   9 September 2012 at 9:40 pm

   https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10151038239926709

   Successive governments have argued that competition between retailers is keeping prices down more effectively than would regulation. But in fact, retail electricity rates have risen 4% a year faster than inflation.

   This is because the five generator/retailers (three SOEs and two private sector companies) have built expensive retailing structures and the companies “move in convoy” on prices, Dr Bertram says.

   As a result, household electricity prices are double what they would have been under old-fashioned regulation, a system that could have delivered lower prices without any loss of supply security or quality of supply.

   So much for competition keeping prices down. Of course, it can’t actually do that as it produces unnecessary duplication which inevitably increases costs and thus prices.

   Apparently it’s in the SST as well but I can’t find it online there.

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS