The Green Infrastructure Fund

Written By: - Date published: 2:48 pm, July 15th, 2017 - 18 comments
Categories: climate change, disaster, Environment, greens - Tags:

Press release from the Green Party’s AGM.

Green Infrastructure Fund | Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

It’s time to speed up investment in the big projects that will kick-start the green economy and create good jobs.

Responding to the challenge of climate change is an opportunity to shift New Zealand’s economy onto a cleaner path. The Green Infrastructure Fund will help fund transformative projects that move New Zealand towards a carbon-neutral economy by 2050.

In our first term of Government, the Green Party will:

  • Establish a government-owned, independent, for profit Green Infrastructure Fund with a social and environmental purpose, to act as a magnet attracting private finance to transformational low carbon, climate resilient projects.
  • The Fund will kick-start new clean infrastructure projects like solar and wind power installations, energy efficient buildings, biofuels, and other clean technologies.
  • The Fund will have a minimum target rate of return of 7 percent, an annual emissions reduction goal of one million tonnes of CO2, and generate thousands of new jobs.
  • It will cost $110 million over three years to be initially paid for by raising oil royalty rates from 46 percent to the international average rate of 70 percent.

In time, the Fund will see billions of dollars of (mainly) private sector finance funding new renewable energy plants, solar panel installations, energy efficiency retrofits, the development and production of significant volumes of biofuels, and other clean technology projects.

Similar green investment funds and banks can be found in Europe, Australia, Japan, Malaysia, and the United Arab Emirates. Six states of America — California, New York, Hawaii, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Connecticut — have newly established green banks. With the help of green banks and funds, these countries are achieving greater economic prosperity while at the same time reducing their contribution to climate change. New Zealand can too.

How does it work?

  1. The government kick-starts the Green Investment Fund with an initial injection of $100 million.
  2. The government investment acts as a magnet to attract other private investors, such as pension and Kiwisaver funds, iwi, and other long-term investors. Overseas, similar funds have raised up to $10 for every $1 of government contribution.
  3. The Fund provides finance or equity to organisations that have strong plans to build infrastructure or other projects that help to reduce New Zealand’s contribution to climate change.
  4. A project gets funded and built.
  5. Over time, the organisation that built the project pays back the Green Infrastructure Fund or the Fund’s stake in the project gets sold off for a profit.

More information (PDFs)

Green Party Infrastructure Fund Policy
Green Party Infrastructure Fund two-pager
Green Party Infrastructure brochure 

18 comments on “The Green Infrastructure Fund”

  1. Pretty simple, pretty solid. This is going to lead to inevitable questions about avoiding dud investments, (screen them, and accept that losing out on a few investments still leaves room for profit like in any other infrastructure fund) but overall part of a sound strategy, especially if combined with things like a carbon tax.

  2. ‘ Carbon neutral ‘ ?

    Hmmm… when they got back an alleged alien description of what constitutes the basic building blocks for them it was supposed to be silicone based… is this what they have in mind?


  3. I really do wish that they’d all read The Entrepreneurial State by Mariana Mazzucato. It shows them how this sort of shit needs to be done if we want to develop our economy.

    This investment fund should become and R&D fund focussed upon sustainable energy research that researches sustainable energy and the factories to produce it. Probably worth building the factories as well.

    That research then becomes publicly available so that private enterprise run with it although, IMO, this isn’t something that private enterprise is going to improve.

    The end result is that the economy develops and we start producing high value stuff.

    • weka 3.1

      Any reason they can’t do both? I haven’t read the full policy yet, but I’m assuming that this Fund isn’t primarily an R and D fund. It’s basically a way to get business and organisations to transition quickly by providing finance. Govt should be doing R and D as well.

      • Doing both is probably a good idea but even then it should be under a single government department set up to look into these things, to provide guidance and funding.

        • Incognito

          If by “guidance” you mean the kind of stuff that comes out of MBIE, for example, I’d run a mile.

          • Draco T Bastard

            I’m thinking more along the lines of NASA.

            • Incognito

              I’m not familiar with NASA (not at all my area); could you please briefly expand on this?

              The more important question is how it would fit in the current NZ R & D culture & infrastructure, if there’s such a thing?

                • Incognito

                  Nice story, thank you.

                  About the only name that rings a bell is Jeff Tallon who, among many other things, used to (?) write good pieces for the NZ Herald.

                • We could have the lucre as well if the government made it available. That’s a large part of the problem – the government simply spend doesn’t enough on our R&D.

              • I’m not familiar with NASA (not at all my area); could you please briefly expand on this?

                NASA has the brief for aeronautics and space research and development. This is their guide and they use it to choose ideas to research that may help with that. Those ideas can come from anywhere when NASA asks for methods to produce a specific outcome: Private corporations, public institutions and themselves. When they get an idea they discuss it and then, if chosen, fund it until failure or completion. The funding will go to where the idea came from so if it came from a private corporation then they’ll get funding to do the research for it.

                They develop the manufacturing techniques as well.

                The research that they do is then publicly available for anybody, anywhere to use for any purpose including foreign countries and businesses.

                The Entrepreneurial State by Mariana Mazzucato is a book that is well worth reading.

                The more important question is how it would fit in the current NZ R & D culture & infrastructure, if there’s such a thing?

                NZ does have a system but it seems complicated and inefficient compared to the US system. We seem to do piecemeal research that doesn’t have a defined goal and so we fail to produce end products as well. The process to get funding is excessively bureaucratic (the government not wanting to spend money results in a lack of R&D as the scientists end up spending as much time filling in applications as doing actual research) and a general lack of funding anyway (The amount of funding that our government makes available for research is pitiful).

                How to get it to fit is another question that I don’t have an answer to as I really don’t have enough knowledge of it. From what I’ve heard the present system should simply be thrown out and replaced.

                • Incognito

                  The first part about NASA was informative, thank you. I found more info on the NASA website. [Where else? Duh!]

                  The second part I wholeheartedly agree with. The ‘ecosystem’ of state-funded R & D here in NZ is risk-averse and timid & fragile and not surprisingly this has led to a corresponding culture of inertia.

                  The Government produces many consultation and discussion documents – these are good documents per se – but without exception fails to take next step; it’s a never-ending talk-fest. For example:

                  In this environment throwing more Tax Payers’ money at it would just be a waste IMHO but obviously the sector is hopelessly underfunded here in NZ, not just by OECD standards but also and more so by outcomes. No wonder that many of the ‘success stories’ move off-shore.

                  Science does not know boundaries and ought to benefit the whole of mankind. Due to its relatively remote location New Zealand must invest (!) more in (the) weightless economy.

                  I also checked out the book you recommend and I might indeed read it.

  4. Katipo 4

    Nice to see policy with some vision and exactly the kind of thing that could help make a difference to one the greatest threats to the future existence of the human race as we know it.
    Would be good if more time was given to discussing proposals like this in the main stream media instead of spaghetti pizzas, Trump handshake fails and Winston’s smoking habbit.

  5. BLiP 5

    This setting up of a Green Investment Bank “fund” seems an awfully neoliberal way to be going about things. Essentially, this policy details a ritualistic ceremony in which devotees pray to the “The Market” for “transformational low carbon, climate resilient projects” to deliver us from evil. Its all just so much bullshit and jellybeans.

    The policy is also bad politics. First off, it plays to a Green Party weakness. The MSM long ago colluded with National Ltd™ to manufacture a seemingly permanent and near universal perception that the Greens are the least suitable of all political parties to be talking economics and finance. Secondly, its not new. There’s a few semantic tweaks but, just like last time, Bill English will have no trouble in dismissing it as silly and unnecessary. And thirdly, the idea doesn’t actually do anything in the real world about mitigating climate change. It’s just another boutique funding mechanism, might as well have a great big lolly scramble for lawyers and bankers.

    Here’s an idea: ring-fence wind/solar/biofuel activities; create $5 billion by fiat and only spend that money developing and managing those activities; set up a government department to manage this function nationally; employ managers to manage, scientists to work on improving existing technologies, and workers to commence construction/manufacture of existing products and new ones as they come on line, and infrastructure. All infrastructure and manufacturing facilities developed will be owned by the public, as will any profits and savings. Of course, that’s provided the neoliberals don’t privatise them.

    • weka 5.1

      Pretty sure that any left wing govt formed in 2017 is going to be working within a neoliberal framework initially. Best that can happen is get a strong Green presence in a Labour-led govt and then work on getting them to shift towards social democracy.

      I don’t think the policy is as bad as you make out. From what I can tell they want to get as many businesses and organisations converted to low carbon as soon as possible, and across the board. They tried something similar with solar back in the day, where govt money would be used to kick start the industry, getting enough businesses up and running and then the price would start coming down and thus the industry is established. I can’t see the problem with that tbh (other than they were prevented politically from doing that).

      How is transitioning NZ off fossil fuels not part of the global move to reduce carbon emissions?

      • BLiP 5.1.1

        Transitioning NZ off fossil fuels is a part of the global move to reduce carbon emissions. I never said it wasn’t. What I said is that the proposed green fund doesn’t help do that, it just clips the ticket.

        If the desired policy outcome is to provide the motivation, products, and infrastructure required to speed this along, the government would be best to do the job itself, especially since this is an urgent matter of national security. There are plenty of existing levers which can be pulled to move business away from carbon use, taxation being, perhaps, the most obvious and motivational. A better policy, IMO, would be advocating for that, and anything immediately practical – even something like an extension of the powers and functions of DoC. But a new/old speculative funding mechanism? Really?

        Its a tough one for the Green Party, though. Climate change is the most important issue currently facing the country, yet most New Zealander voters, by far, don’t believe it. How do you cut through that, especially when the perpetual MSM/ government narrative is implied denial? And, yeah, true: not helping is that neoliberalism is ubiquitous in New Zealand society, especially in the economic and political realms. Its been running rampant for more than a whole generation. Despite its monstrous, grotesque results, Its now the “accepted truth”.

        Perhaps a vivid cut-through might be some stark “for the many, not the few” social justice policies. Labour could call for the return of compulsory union membership while the Green Party could call for the immediate occupation of Auckland’s 40,000 “ghost houses”. The benefits would be immediate, widespread, and lasting. But, yeah, s’pose, best not frighten the punters out in punterland.

  6. Ad 6

    I like the idea of the fund.

    The questions I would like to put to Mr Shaw are:

    – What is the role of EECA, and the Electricity Commission, in this funds’ administration?

    – What is the role of the governments’ 51% interest in electricity generation companies in this fund?

    – How much income from oil royalties is forecast – both from the effects of the new much higher tax, and from the collapse in oil exploration world-wide?

    – What is the role of NZTA in the change to renewables? Or Kiwirail?

    – What is the role of NZSuper Guardians in this fund?

    – Other than the stated rate of return, what are the benchmarks for success of the fund?

    – Is the taxpayer liable if the fund is bankrupted?

Links to post

Leave a Comment

Show Tags

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • National out of touch over immigration
    National’s abrupt backflip on their recently-announced changes to immigration shows they never understood the problem and just came up with a confused knee jerk response, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “Regional communities and businesses were quite right to ...
    1 hour ago
  • English out of touch on homelessness
    Bill English’s comments that he doesn’t know why people are complaining about the blowout in the number of homeless families the government is putting up in motels just shows how tired and out of touch National is after nine years, ...
    5 hours ago
  • All Kiwis to have same standard of cancer care
    Labour is promising that all New Zealanders will have access to the same level of cancer care no matter where they live in the country, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.   “As someone who has survived cancer I ...
    1 day ago
  • Infrastructure announcement too long coming
    “What took you so long?” is Labour’s response to the Government’s announcement of a new infrastructure investment vehicle. Labour’s Auckland Issues spokesperson Phil Twyford says Labour announced its policy in 2015 to debt-finance infrastructure and service that debt with targeted ...
    1 day ago
  • Time for a breather on immigration
    National has no idea how to house the record number of people entering New Zealand, let alone cope with the pressure on health, education, and transport from this record population growth, says Labour’s Immigration spokesperson Iain Lees-Galloway. ...
    3 days ago
  • Labour to invest $4 billion in education
    Labour’s Education Manifesto will bring positive change across the education sector and is backed by a massive investment, says Labour’s Education Spokesperson Chris Hipkins.  “Labour’s plan will see an extra $4 billion invested over the next four years. It’s organised ...
    3 days ago
  • National’s shame: worst homelessness in the OECD
    National’s legacy is a housing crisis that has given New Zealand the worst homeless rate in the developed world, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    3 days ago
  • Labour taking action on school donations
    Labour will end so-called voluntary school donations for the majority of parents across the country under its $4 billion plan to revitalise the education sector, says Labour Leader Andrew Little. “Labour has always been committed to a world-class free education ...
    3 days ago
  • Labour to work with Queenstown to build more houses
    Labour will work with Queenstown-Lakes District Council, iwi, and the Community Housing Trust to build the modern, affordable housing Queenstown desperately needs, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    4 days ago
  • Nats blow the Budget on motels after bowling state houses
    National is spending $140,000 a day putting homeless families in motels, the legacy of nine years of selling off and knocking down state houses, says Labour Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    4 days ago
  • New revelations in Joanne Harrison report
    The State Services Commission’s report into the treatment of whistle-blowers by Joanne Harrison has revealed new accusations against the convicted fraudster, says Labour MP Sue Moroney.  “The report found that four staff inside the Ministry of Transport who had raised ...
    4 days ago
  • Snafu at Princess Margaret
    Jonathan Coleman has to stop the stalling over a new building for mental health services in Christchurch to replace the quake damaged Princess Margaret Hospital, says Labour’s Health spokesperson David Clark. “The Government must accept that Christchurch is still recovering ...
    4 days ago
  • Labour’s fiscal plan to build a fairer New Zealand
    Labour will re-build our housing, health and education while responsibly managing New Zealand’s finances, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.  “Under Labour’s Fiscal Plan we will deliver big investments in the services we all need and care about, invest ...
    5 days ago
  • Nats show they’re the tax dodgers’ best friends
    The government is taking the knife to IRD at a time when we need a highly skilled department to ensure that multinationals and speculators don’t get away with dodging tax, says Labour’s Revenue spokesperson Michael Wood. ...
    5 days ago
  • Labour secures the future for NZ Super
    A Labour Government will secure the future for New Zealand Superannuation so we can continue to provide superannuation to those retiring at age 65, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “One of the first things a Labour-led Government will ...
    6 days ago
  • Multinationals must pay fair share of tax
    A Labour Government will crack down on multinational companies that are dodging paying their fair share of tax, says Labour Leader Andrew Little. “New Zealanders are missing out by hundreds of millions according to the IRD because multinational companies can ...
    6 days ago
  • ACT’s approach to children backward and ill informed
    Act’s new deputy leader’s claim that Labour’s support for families could “extend the misery of child poverty and even child abuse” is ill informed and offensive, says Labour’s Deputy Leader Jacinda Ardern. ...
    1 week ago
  • Canterbury hatchet job a disgrace
    The Government’s glib acceptance of advice that the Canterbury District Health Board doesn’t need more money is a hatchet job and a disgrace, says Labour’s Health Spokesperson David Clark. “To claim that the DHB was using tactics to leverage more ...
    1 week ago
  • Quality for Kiwi kids at ECE
    After more than a decade of rapid growth in the number of children participating in Early Childhood Education (ECE), it’s time to take stock and map out a clear plan for the future, says Labour’s Education spokesperson Chris Hipkins. ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour to boost ECE quality
    Labour will ensure kids get the best start in life by boosting funding for Early Childhood Centres to employ 100 per cent qualified and registered teachers, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour will stump up a million dollars for Maniototo Hospital
    A Labour led Government will make a million dollars available to rebuild the Maniototo Base hospital in Ranfurly, says the Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.  “This will be a much needed boost for a long overdue rebuild that has ...
    1 week ago
  • No vision for the West Coast
    The West Coast welcomes any Government investment in our region but the lack of any real alternative vision for the West Coast’s economy is disappointing, says Damien O’Connor Labour’s West Coast-Tasman MP.  “The establishment of a Mining Research Unit will ...
    2 weeks ago
  • National’s youth work scheme too little too late
    After nine years, National’s belated attempt to provide work opportunities for unemployed youth should be seen for what it is, a half-hearted, election gimmick from a party that’s ignored the problem till now, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Kiwis won’t fall for Joyce’s spin
    Steven Joyce’s embarrassingly obvious spin on Labour’s Families Package won’t fool anyone, says Labour’s Finance spokesperson Grant Robertson. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour prioritises families and public services
    Labour’s Families Package delivers a bigger income boost to more than 70 per cent of families with children than Budget 2017. By not spending $1.5 billion a year on tax cuts, Labour is able to do more for lower and ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Kiwis can’t sleep in your ghost houses, Nick
    The Government’s housing infrastructure announcement is another Nick Smith special – over-promising with no detail on delivery, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour helps older New Zealanders and low income families with winter heating bills
    Labour will further boost its commitment to warm, healthy housing with a Winter Energy Payment for superannuitants and people receiving main benefits, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “Everyone deserves a warm, healthy home to live in. But that’s ...
    2 weeks ago
  • National must rule out retrospective override for Ruataniwha
    National must categorically rule out using retrospective legislation to override the Supreme Court’s decision that the land swap of conservation land flooded by the proposed Ruataniwha Dam was illegal, says Labour’s Shadow Attorney General David Parker. “Having not got their ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Flavell’s failure a win for Māori landowners
    The Māori Development Minister’s admission that his unpopular Ture Whenua Māori Bill won’t pass into law prior to the election is a victory for Māori landowners, but only a change of government will keep the Bill gone for good, says ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Stats confirm growing housing shortfall
    National’s failure to fix the housing shortage has been starkly illustrated by new statistics, says Labour Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Systemic abuse of kids in state care
    After admitting there was systemic abuse of children in State care the Government must do the right thing and launch an independent inquiry, says Labour’s Deputy Leader Jacinda Ardern. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Migrant worker exploitation needs sharper focus
    The astonishing number of employers found guilty of exploiting migrants shows that migrant exploitation is a serious problem in New Zealand, says Labour Workplace Relations and Safety spokesperson Iain Lees-Galloway. “A total of 53 companies have been banned from recruiting ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Minister faces questions over dam debacle
    Today’s Supreme Court ruling dismissing an appeal to allow a land swap for the controversial Ruataniwha Dam is a victory for our conservation estate and Hawke’s Bay ratepayers, but leaves the Conservation Minister with serious questions to answer, says Ikaroa-Rāwhiti ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Too little too late on Wellington housing
    The announcement today on social housing in Wellington by the National Government is a pitiful and cynical election ploy, says Labour’s Wellington Central MP Grant Robertson. “In 2012 Housing New Zealand emptied out the Gordon Wilson Flats, taking 130 places ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Foreign trusts wilt in the sunlight, but more transparency needed
    The fact that the numbers of foreign trusts registered in New Zealand has plummeted after the Government’s belated and reluctant imposition of a new reporting regime, in the wake of the Panama Papers scandal, shows the need for a transparent, ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Speech by Grant Robertson: The Future of Work and Labour’s Economic Vision
    At the election in September voters will face a choice between a government led by Andrew Little with a fresh approach to give every New Zealander a fair share in prosperity or the continuation of a tired government, out of ...
    3 weeks ago