The selective empathy of Key’s callous government

Written By: - Date published: 9:54 am, May 12th, 2014 - 21 comments
Categories: class war, greens, housing, labour, mana-party, same old national - Tags:

Last night 3 News picked up on the information provided from an OIA request by Phil Tywford.  It shows that Key’s government is planning to sell off a significant number of state houses in provincial locations.  Many of these houses have been empty for way too long.  The 3 News report hints that may be because there have been plans for a while to sell them off.

National government state house sales Tamaki Housing Group

The 3 News report focused on Tither street in Huntly, where the remaining 6 state houses look likely to be sold off to private enterprise. 8 state houses in the street have alreadybeen  sold.  The tenants are very unhappy at the prospect.

Streets like Tither St in Huntly, 40 kilometres north of Hamilton, will be part of a government plan to sell almost two-thirds of its properties in the north Waikato over the next 10 years.

Nick Smith claims that the information uncovered by Twyford is out of date.  Nevertheless, 3 News claims there are 2800 empty state houses across NZ.  Smith claims that:

“The Government is absolutely committed to providing social housing into the future,”

That is a slippery response, because state housing is only one kind of social housing.  Other forms include those run by non-government entities.  The 2010 report for the NZ government, “Home and Housed: A Vision for Social housing in New Zealand“, spells out the government’s approach.  It is clear the aim is to cut back on state housing and move towards other forms of social housing.  On pp.4-5, it is laid out:

Underpinning this vision are four imperatives:

1. Empowering HNZC to focus on the ‘high needs’ sector

2. Develop third-party participation

3. Instigate initiatives across the broader housing spectrum

4. Clarifying sector accountabilities and delivery expectations.

[…]

These strategies include:

Curtailing the Crown’s involvement as sole provider

Diversifying the funding of social housing by increasing private-sector (i.e.

Non-Government Organisation) participation

Driving for more efficiency and impact in housing subsidies.

Meanwhile, those already struggling to find affordable housing of a standard most Kiwis would expect, are being put under further pressure by Auckland Council.  Yesterday, Josh Fagan reported on Stuff.  These are people that have already been failed by government provisions.  People who would benefit from state housing.

Western Park Village, in Ranui, West Auckland, has been ordered by Auckland Council to apply for permanent status consent for 23 long-term tenants who were no longer classified as “transient”. Owner Darryll Heaven said the new guideline was “complete nonsense” and residents only stayed for extended periods because they had nowhere else to go.

He said the park was home to a lot of disenfranchised and desperate people, including families who have been kicked out of government housing and were effectively “un-houseable“.

This caravan park is in Minister Paula Bennett’s electorate. Rather than work with her government on making more suitable, secure and stable forms of housing for such people, Bennett disguised her callous approach with shallow words of empathy.

Social development minister Paula Bennett said living in a caravan or campground was defined by the ministry as temporary accommodation. But, she added that “didn’t necessarily mean that person or family has an overall serious housing need”.

Meanwhile she aims to do little that is helpful:

Bennett said the current situation was a matter for the Auckland Council and Western Park.

According to Massey University researcher Christina Severinsen, thousand of Kiwis live in similar unstable situations across NZ because there is no other affordable accommodation available to them. She is reported as saying that,

The danger for people in campgrounds or caravan parks, she said, was that if they were evicted there were “very few places for them to go”.

“Often people move on to staying in cars, boarding houses, rough sleeping and sharing housing with other families. We need investment in housing stock that low-income families can afford.”

In contrast, Bennett is quick to step up and offer support for a high profile TV actress: in so doing the minister gets herself a bit of cheap public promotion.

Social Development Minister Paula Bennett has swung behind embattledShortland Street star Teuila Blakely, under siege over a leaked sex tape.

A selected quote from Bennett is provided in big letters with the article:


This isn’t what defines her, what defines her
is the kindness and warmth shown throughout
her life as a mother, daughter and friend.

                       Paula Bennett, Social Development Minister

Where is similar support for all the kind and warm people who struggle to find affordable housing, while Bennett’s fellow ministers and PM work to make life even tougher for them?

Nick Smith and endangerred housing

Green Party policy is to increase  state housing by at least 3000 units per year in the next 3 years.

Mana Party Policy: 20,000 more state houses in the next 2 years.

In a recent comment on the Standard, Phil Twyford indicated Labour will be addressing the state housing issue before the election.

21 comments on “The selective empathy of Key’s callous government”

  1. tc 1

    How many have been lost in akl as they transfer public wealth to private hands in places like Glen Innes and sandringham done under the PPP banner.

    Forget the rehtoric and BS from shonky, double dipton, Nicked Smithers etc and what do the numbers say right here and now about total dwellings available for those in need bothe where there is work and in rural where there is alot less opportunity to work.

    Inconvenient facts need to keep meeting Govt Spin rapidly and rammed home.

    “The Government is absolutely committed to providing social housing into the future…” weasel words as into the future is nat speak for someone else’s problem such as a govt that actually cares.

  2. One Anonymous Bloke 2

    High demand is good for business.

    • aerobubble 2.1

      Cavaet. High demand shrinking supply is destabilizing.

      Take the GFC, printed money chasing fewer falling priced assets.

      Oil companies assets over valued in a world switch out of carbon.

      Its this notion that “we can’t have too much of a good thing” that plagues the right and their economists, they just wont regard it with any conscious.

  3. Tiger Mountain 3

    It is shameful the way our social security system is now looked down upon and the coppers lined up against users of a once mighty state resource as in Glen Innes.

    One thing is for sure, thousands more state houses/apartments need to be built. Even the ShonKey loving aspirational “tradies” and builders might have to support this. Stable affordable rentals would let more people just get on with enjoying life rather than trapped by the banks in the “own your own place” ratrace or gouging landlords.

    State houses should be for life if desired, and to match modern life trends transferable and swappable for education, work or holidays between tenants in different suburbs or regions by agreement.

    With modular factory construction (heh, no more rimu timber) all sorts of layout and people combinations are easily possible unlike earlier iterations of the standard design plonked on a generous section. The nats portray this thing about aging couples in huge 4 bedroom homes etc. which is basically horseshit. In more rural areas shared gardens could be set up and smaller versions in the cities. Mini communities could be built with individual units for private space and shared utility spaces. Changing family sizes–add or subtract a module.

    If you agree go to the next Glen Innes action and offer support.

    • Tracey 3.1

      once the new fletchers town was built between st johns and glen innes, developer demand for more land was a matter of time… so glen innes state homes became more attractive.

  4. captain hook 4

    this government is a government of weasels. it goes without saying. it really hurts them when they have to do something for somebody else. they just cant handle it.

  5. Tracey 5

    is ranui in bennetts current electorate or upper harbour, or in the pm electorate where her last community meeting was held?

    is the actress a personal friend of obe of bennetts children or a child of one of her friends.

    • karol 5.1

      Ranui is currently in Bennett’s Waitakere electorate.

      Wikipedia.

      Electorate boundary includes Ranui.

      The Upper Harbour electorate doesn’t come into being until this year’s election.

      The linked article only mentions Bennett as a high profile friend of the actress. Which could mean anything. Didn’t know that about Bennett and/or her children being close personal friends.

      • Tracey 5.1.1

        its the unseemly haste with which she has moved her focus from her current employers, the people of waitakere, to the wealthy of upper harbour and hobsonville.

  6. Tracey 6

    lets start calling it what it is

    nationals homeless policy

    in five and ten years time watch as nz streets become more crowded with people begging and sleeping on benches.

    • fisiani 6.1

      On the contrary National policy is to move an elderly couple from the 3 bedroom state house where they brought up their five children to a one bedroom state house so that the family with five children in a Mangere garage can move into the vacated 3 bedroom home.

  7. Mary 7

    Housing NZ’s criteria already excludes “moderate need”. This has been the case for a while. It’s part of an overall plan to pull out of housing altogether and is happening by stealth. Like in many areas, the government knows it can’t just do what it wants straight away especially when it’s about removing things that represent deeply held values. Part of the by-stealth approach to getting out of housing is to stir up resentment against “all this free housing for life malarkey”. The effect of course is that the policy behind public housing shifts from providing a home to being an emergency housing provider only. There’s already the move towards shifting delivery on to the community then add the halting of ongoing maintenance programmes then like magic it’s less than a short step to pulling out altogether. This is Nact’s great plan and the Left needs to challenge the government directly on it.

    • Tracey 7.1

      the homeless policy, serving the developers of nz since 2008

      • Mary 7.1.1

        An effective opposition would nail the government on what it’s doing and make it own up to its agenda. Key et al only get away with what it does because nobody puts the dishonest tactics and intended objective squarely to the government and in the right forum. We just plod along and every now and then we wake up to find one more thing gone.

  8. thats a bit rough on fisiani it made perfect sense to me….this blog needs comments like that

    • Descendant Of Sssmith 8.1

      Nah it only makes sense from a neo-iberal right-wing paradigm and even then I have my doubts.

      Part of the reason for security of tenure for life was that people would treat their house as their own and look after it.

      They would do much of the maintenance themselves, put in gardens, raise their families, take in nieces and nephews to give parents relief, become part of the local community and so on.

      Most state house tenants did, and still do this.

      Many of those “old people” have invested heaps of time and effort into those homes and communities.

      As someone who grew up in a state house and in a state housing area I know my own parents did that and so did many many others. From wall-papering to painting to clearing the gutters and so on.

      People are much less inclined to do that for a private landlord, particularly ones charging such high rents.

      Of course what is happening with the reduction in state housing is that rather than be forced into the private rental market, which they can’t afford, many are opting out of the housing market. There’s plenty of landlords who can’t rent their properties – it’s not just housing NZ properties sitting empty in many towns.

      The first efforts to subsidise private landlords was the opening up of Accommodation Supplement to people not on benefit. This helped for a while until landlords put rents up every-time the accommodation supplement rates were increased. This to some extent was manageable for working people who had faux wage increases via tax cuts.

      Those on benefit get no increase at all from tax cuts and so did not get the same comparative advantage.

      Tax breaks via LAQC’s etc further subsidised landlords.

      Both these things helped drive prices up as did baby boomers with surplus income and immigration.

      Adding the lowest paid and the poor into the demand mix can only be seen as cruel and unusual punishment.

      This was done in four ways:
      1. Not building sufficient state housing to keep up with population growth and decreasing relative wages (remember 70% of GDP used to be paid out in wages – it’s now less than 30% from the last figures I’ve seen).
      2. Selling off and reducing existing housing stock
      3. Hiding housing need by toughening the criteria so people became invisible. Part of this was also reducing access to HNZ offices and staff so it was harder to make contact as well.
      4. Pushing stories about bad tenants, bludgers, long term tenants, etc to continue the right wing notion of these people are stealing off you.

      If state housing levels had been maintained as they should have been then this notion of people needing to get out so some “more deserving” person can get in would not exist in the way this is being expressed.

      So the next step to help the private sector landlords pay their inflated mortgages is to subsidise them further via “social housing”. Instead of paying and maintaining state housing even bigger subsidies will now be paid to private landlords, community groups – who will eventually pay the price through reduced funding elsewhere – and Iwi who it will possibly restrict the access to this housing to their own people or at least prioritise them.

      Of course pushing more people into the housing market will further push rents up meaning all those people whinging about paying for state housing in their taxes will simply pay through higher prices and higher rents simply transferring their $ to the banks and existing landlords.

      Somehow they delude themselves that transferring their earnings to interest and private profit is a good thing while transferring money to the government to provide support for their fellow citizens is a bad thing.

    • Will@Welly 8.2

      Slippery does, as slippery do. Another disciple of the right, trolling around.
      Part of the “sell off” of state housing is theoretically to encourage charitable agencies such as the Salvation Army to step in to fill the gap. I’ve talked to a couple privately here in Wellington, and guess what, they don’t have the money. Surprise, surprise. While they would be keen to help out if someone gave them the houses, they don’t want to be landlords. That is not their focus. Too much conflict of interest.
      Also, there was a report – pretty sure it was on Nat. Radio, but can’t recall the name – that an agency from overseas was keen to come in and invest in the building and administration of “state houses”. I just wanted to cry. This is not my country.
      This government is selling off the integrity, the self-respect and dignity of ordinary New Zealanders.

      • karol 8.2.1

        Yes, the possible selling of state houses to some overseas entities was mentioned in news articles that I cited in my April post on the government asset stripping state housing.

        It was mentioned in this Simon Collins article It was revealed by emails/letters accessed through a Phil Twyford OIA request.

        The documents also reveal that Housing NZ plans to raise $383 million in the three years to June 2016 by selling or leasing state houses to community and iwi groups and “the possible introduction of third party equity via possible overseas providers”.

        This is the first time anyone has mentioned foreign companies being involved in planned state house sales, and Mr Twyford said it might point to possible public/private partnerships to redevelop state housing.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Labour to work with Queenstown to build more houses
    Labour will work with Queenstown-Lakes District Council, iwi, and the Community Housing Trust to build the modern, affordable housing Queenstown desperately needs, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    15 hours ago
  • Nats blow the Budget on motels after bowling state houses
    National is spending $140,000 a day putting homeless families in motels, the legacy of nine years of selling off and knocking down state houses, says Labour Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    15 hours ago
  • New revelations in Joanne Harrison report
    The State Services Commission’s report into the treatment of whistle-blowers by Joanne Harrison has revealed new accusations against the convicted fraudster, says Labour MP Sue Moroney.  “The report found that four staff inside the Ministry of Transport who had raised ...
    15 hours ago
  • Snafu at Princess Margaret
    Jonathan Coleman has to stop the stalling over a new building for mental health services in Christchurch to replace the quake damaged Princess Margaret Hospital, says Labour’s Health spokesperson David Clark. “The Government must accept that Christchurch is still recovering ...
    22 hours ago
  • Labour’s fiscal plan to build a fairer New Zealand
    Labour will re-build our housing, health and education while responsibly managing New Zealand’s finances, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.  “Under Labour’s Fiscal Plan we will deliver big investments in the services we all need and care about, invest ...
    2 days ago
  • Nats show they’re the tax dodgers’ best friends
    The government is taking the knife to IRD at a time when we need a highly skilled department to ensure that multinationals and speculators don’t get away with dodging tax, says Labour’s Revenue spokesperson Michael Wood. ...
    2 days ago
  • Labour secures the future for NZ Super
    A Labour Government will secure the future for New Zealand Superannuation so we can continue to provide superannuation to those retiring at age 65, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “One of the first things a Labour-led Government will ...
    3 days ago
  • Multinationals must pay fair share of tax
    A Labour Government will crack down on multinational companies that are dodging paying their fair share of tax, says Labour Leader Andrew Little. “New Zealanders are missing out by hundreds of millions according to the IRD because multinational companies can ...
    3 days ago
  • ACT’s approach to children backward and ill informed
    Act’s new deputy leader’s claim that Labour’s support for families could “extend the misery of child poverty and even child abuse” is ill informed and offensive, says Labour’s Deputy Leader Jacinda Ardern. ...
    7 days ago
  • Canterbury hatchet job a disgrace
    The Government’s glib acceptance of advice that the Canterbury District Health Board doesn’t need more money is a hatchet job and a disgrace, says Labour’s Health Spokesperson David Clark. “To claim that the DHB was using tactics to leverage more ...
    7 days ago
  • Quality for Kiwi kids at ECE
    After more than a decade of rapid growth in the number of children participating in Early Childhood Education (ECE), it’s time to take stock and map out a clear plan for the future, says Labour’s Education spokesperson Chris Hipkins. ...
    7 days ago
  • Labour to boost ECE quality
    Labour will ensure kids get the best start in life by boosting funding for Early Childhood Centres to employ 100 per cent qualified and registered teachers, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    7 days ago
  • Labour will stump up a million dollars for Maniototo Hospital
    A Labour led Government will make a million dollars available to rebuild the Maniototo Base hospital in Ranfurly, says the Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.  “This will be a much needed boost for a long overdue rebuild that has ...
    7 days ago
  • No vision for the West Coast
    The West Coast welcomes any Government investment in our region but the lack of any real alternative vision for the West Coast’s economy is disappointing, says Damien O’Connor Labour’s West Coast-Tasman MP.  “The establishment of a Mining Research Unit will ...
    1 week ago
  • National’s youth work scheme too little too late
    After nine years, National’s belated attempt to provide work opportunities for unemployed youth should be seen for what it is, a half-hearted, election gimmick from a party that’s ignored the problem till now, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    1 week ago
  • Kiwis won’t fall for Joyce’s spin
    Steven Joyce’s embarrassingly obvious spin on Labour’s Families Package won’t fool anyone, says Labour’s Finance spokesperson Grant Robertson. ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour prioritises families and public services
    Labour’s Families Package delivers a bigger income boost to more than 70 per cent of families with children than Budget 2017. By not spending $1.5 billion a year on tax cuts, Labour is able to do more for lower and ...
    1 week ago
  • Kiwis can’t sleep in your ghost houses, Nick
    The Government’s housing infrastructure announcement is another Nick Smith special – over-promising with no detail on delivery, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour helps older New Zealanders and low income families with winter heating bills
    Labour will further boost its commitment to warm, healthy housing with a Winter Energy Payment for superannuitants and people receiving main benefits, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “Everyone deserves a warm, healthy home to live in. But that’s ...
    2 weeks ago
  • National must rule out retrospective override for Ruataniwha
    National must categorically rule out using retrospective legislation to override the Supreme Court’s decision that the land swap of conservation land flooded by the proposed Ruataniwha Dam was illegal, says Labour’s Shadow Attorney General David Parker. “Having not got their ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Flavell’s failure a win for Māori landowners
    The Māori Development Minister’s admission that his unpopular Ture Whenua Māori Bill won’t pass into law prior to the election is a victory for Māori landowners, but only a change of government will keep the Bill gone for good, says ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Stats confirm growing housing shortfall
    National’s failure to fix the housing shortage has been starkly illustrated by new statistics, says Labour Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Systemic abuse of kids in state care
    After admitting there was systemic abuse of children in State care the Government must do the right thing and launch an independent inquiry, says Labour’s Deputy Leader Jacinda Ardern. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Migrant worker exploitation needs sharper focus
    The astonishing number of employers found guilty of exploiting migrants shows that migrant exploitation is a serious problem in New Zealand, says Labour Workplace Relations and Safety spokesperson Iain Lees-Galloway. “A total of 53 companies have been banned from recruiting ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Minister faces questions over dam debacle
    Today’s Supreme Court ruling dismissing an appeal to allow a land swap for the controversial Ruataniwha Dam is a victory for our conservation estate and Hawke’s Bay ratepayers, but leaves the Conservation Minister with serious questions to answer, says Ikaroa-Rāwhiti ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Too little too late on Wellington housing
    The announcement today on social housing in Wellington by the National Government is a pitiful and cynical election ploy, says Labour’s Wellington Central MP Grant Robertson. “In 2012 Housing New Zealand emptied out the Gordon Wilson Flats, taking 130 places ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Foreign trusts wilt in the sunlight, but more transparency needed
    The fact that the numbers of foreign trusts registered in New Zealand has plummeted after the Government’s belated and reluctant imposition of a new reporting regime, in the wake of the Panama Papers scandal, shows the need for a transparent, ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Speech by Grant Robertson: The Future of Work and Labour’s Economic Vision
    At the election in September voters will face a choice between a government led by Andrew Little with a fresh approach to give every New Zealander a fair share in prosperity or the continuation of a tired government, out of ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Swimmable Rivers Tour: Waikato
    Last week, we rolled up to the mighty Waikato on the final day of our swimmable rivers tour. Co-Leader James Shaw, Denise Roche MP and I started our day in Horotiu where the primary school has been focussing on the ...
    GreensBy Catherine Delahunty
    3 weeks ago
  • Nats’ failure to train young people contributes to housing stall
    Budget documents forecast that housing construction will stall in the coming year, despite the massive housing shortage, and National’s failure to train young people in building trades is partly to blame, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    3 weeks ago