Trickledown has failed

Written By: - Date published: 9:00 am, April 15th, 2016 - 120 comments
Categories: uncategorized - Tags: ,

trickle-down

A couple of recent Guardian posts sum up how current economic settings are doomed to fail, unless the only goal is to preserve privilege for the 1%.

The first suggests that wealth does not trickle down, it floods offshore into tax havens.  The estimate is that between US$21 trillion and $32 trillion has been sent out of countries to tax havens.  About US$10 trillion is owned by just over 90,000 individuals.  This is US$11 million each.  This is their loose change.

From the article:

These estimates reveal a staggering failure,” says John Christensen of the Tax Justice Network. “Inequality is much, much worse than official statistics show, but politicians are still relying on trickle-down to transfer wealth to poorer people.

“This new data shows the exact opposite has happened: for three decades extraordinary wealth has been cascading into the offshore accounts of a tiny number of super-rich.”

In total, 10 million individuals around the world hold assets offshore, according to Henry’s analysis; but almost half of the minimum estimate of $21tn – $9.8tn – is owned by just 92,000 people. And that does not include the non-financial assets – art, yachts, mansions in Kensington – that many of the world’s movers and shakers like to use as homes for their immense riches.

“If we could figure out how to tax all this offshore wealth without killing the proverbial golden goose, or at least entice its owners to reinvest it back home, this sector of the global underground is easily large enough to make a significant contribution to tax justice, investment and paying the costs of global problems like climate change,” Henry says.

So not only do tax cuts for the wealthy not work, it almost certainly makes things worse for the tax cutting country.

The second is this fascinating article that collates data and analysis from throughout the world about the effect of a universal basic income.  You know the idea that dear leader thought, and the media dutifully reported, was barking mad?

It has a number of links and a great deal of information.  The essence is:

Welcome to the world of a unconditional basic income, or UBI, otherwise known as citizens’ income or social wage. It might look like the stuff of insane utopianism, but the idea is now spreading at speed, from the fringes of the left into mainstream politics – and being tried out around the world. The UK Green party has supported the notion for decades: staunch backing for a version of UBI was one of its key themes at the last election. At its spring conference last month, the Scottish National party passed a motion supporting the idea that “a basic or universal income can potentially provide a foundation to eradicate poverty, make work pay and ensure all our citizens can live in dignity”. A handful of Labour MPs have started to come round to the idea – and serious work is being done among thinktanks and pressure groups, looking at how it might work in the here and now.

Meanwhile, there have been UBI-type policies and experiments in India and Brazil. These have suggested that, contrary to modern stereotypes about “welfare” sapping people’s initiative, a basic income might actually increase people’s appetite for work, by adding to their sense of stability, and making things such as childcare and transport more accessible. A pilot of a UBI-ish policy whereby people on benefits are paid unconditionally is happening in Utrecht, in the Netherlands; other Dutch towns and cities look set to follow its example, and there are plans to pilot a more ambitious kind of basic income in Finland. On 5 June, the Swiss will vote in a referendum on a plan that would see all adults receive about £1,700 a month, with an extra £400 for each child.

And then there is the rising noise from Silicon Valley. The California-based startup incubator Y Combinator has announced that it wants to fund research into UBI’s viability. Its president, Sam Altman, says: “It is impossible to truly have equality of opportunity without some version of guaranteed income.” In New York, the influential venture capitalist Albert Wenger has been sounding off about a basic income for at least three years, claiming it offers an answer to a very modern question. If, as he says, “we are at the beginning of the time where machines will do a lot of the things humans have traditionally done”, how do you avoid “a massive bifurcation of society into those who have wealth and those who don’t”?

These two articles cover issues that need to be addressed and even in sleepy New Zealand represent the cutting edge of current political debate.  Should we allow the uber wealthy to avoid tax or should we insist that everyone pays their fair share so that each of us can enjoy the benefit of a universal basic income?

120 comments on “Trickledown has failed ”

  1. Sabine 1

    Was that not the intended outcome?

    Who ever thought that giving the already rich more money would translate into the already rich with now more money giving some of that money to the poor and down trotten.

    I hear there are still 9 bridges to sell up Northland. It said so yesterday at the NZ Herald.

    • Olwyn 1.1

      People have a tendency to assume that the stuff they rely on will stay in place while cheerfully dismantling the conditions that make that stuff possible – like cutting off the branch on which you are sitting. E.g. Get rid of those nasty unions and there will be no bus strikes, but I will still mysteriously retain my wages and job security. Get schools to rely on volunteers, while ensuring that households need two incomes, leaving no one to volunteer. The list goes on.

      • aerobubble 1.1.1

        Yes, all true, but. Cheap energy fuelled growth, this allowed the reptile right to frame growth as their achievement, their policy of getting givt out of the way, etc. Growing the fnacial sector off the wealth rather than using it to build a better world. i.e we got pummeled by a version of capitalism that not only polluted politics, economics, but the planet, taking attention away from the consequences of producing and using all that cheap fuel less we also discovered it wasnt the conservative revolution or Tory Thatcherites. Take people out and nought happens, take finance or machines and people get on and do. People create wealth, not .1 of .1 o the super super rich, they can be remved and nobody would notice much.

        • Draco T Bastard 1.1.1.1

          People create wealth, not .1 of .1 o the super super rich, they can be remved and nobody would notice much.

          Oh, I’m pretty sure that the other 99% would notice that they’re far better off once we’ve gotten rid of the rich.

          • aerobubble 1.1.1.1.1

            Argument sake. Lets assume that the economy is a set of queues, as more actors in the economy grow queues result. Now communism would argue the queues need to be controlled and result in fewer slower and all feeding out at the same rate. Socialism wants everyone to be in queues and the queues to be flow at a reasonable rate. Capitalism does not care, or cares to not care. Now we live in peak neo-con where the queues are rigged to flow faster if the super ruch have an interest, and slower if the super rich are hurt. So i would argue that removing the individuals would be meaningless since the system is still rigged to replace them with new .1 of .1 ers. We’d only be better off if the new .1 of .1 ers were smarter and did not wished to be toppled from the top of the pile and realized that the rigged system was how a class of neolib private sector bureaucrat parasitically fed off them, sure they become bloated with money but not the good kind, no, the pus kind that bursts in their face.

            • Draco T Bastard 1.1.1.1.1.1

              Now communism would argue the queues need to be controlled and result in fewer slower and all feeding out at the same rate.

              WTF do you mean?

              So i would argue that removing the individuals would be meaningless since the system is still rigged to replace them with new .1 of .1 ers.

              Wouldn’t be removing the individuals – just getting rid of the rich.

              We’d only be better off if the new .1 of .1 ers

              We wouldn’t have them as we got rid of them.

              • aerobubble

                Communism fails because?

                We need to value resources as a community, since no one individual can have the expertise to see both their perochial needs and the bigger picture, we need mechanism.

                Since communism makes each individual a mountain, like fascism, it fails as to maintain value it requires acceptance that the individual alone can never see all risks. No supermen, no Stalin, no Mao, etc no supreme leader whose recognized for their superior expertise when everyone realizes we are not all of equal expertise.

                Now value of valuing must also be valued. Now in order to share any resource we setup queues where those who want a resource arrange themselves to negotiate access. Capitalism succeeds where communism and fascism fail, it letting go of control.

                Now the second part, removing wealth without removing the processes that made a few very rich wont change anything. High progressive taxes over time will.

                • Draco T Bastard

                  We need to value resources as a community, since no one individual can have the expertise to see both their perochial needs and the bigger picture, we need mechanism.

                  Yes.

                  Since communism makes each individual a mountain…

                  Completely meaningless drivel.

                  Now value of valuing must also be valued. Now in order to share any resource we setup queues where those who want a resource arrange themselves to negotiate access.

                  Not even fucken close. There’s a reason why Marx said that everyone would be paid the same for their labour. It’s because he still figured on a market mechanism for actual distribution of resources.

                  Now the second part, removing wealth without removing the processes that made a few very rich wont change anything. High progressive taxes over time will.

                  The second sentence doesn’t follow from the first. In fact, it’s simply an unsupported assertion and evidence shows that it doesn’t really work anyway. Far better not to need progressive taxes by ensuring that no one has a high income.

                  The first sentence is correct – we need to get rid of the processes that allow a few to become rich and replace them with something else:
                  Real Monetary Reform: Ensures that income can’t come from having money
                  Demurrage: Ensures that people won’t be too keen to accumulate excessive amounts of money.
                  A UBI: ensures that everyone has a base income that will ensure a reasonable living standard via a market system.
                  Stopping private ownership of land/factories/houses: Ensures that people can’t accumulate non-monetary wealth.

          • TC 1.1.1.1.2

            Ben eltons ‘stark’ reached the same conclusion. Once total toxic overload was reached, the uber wealthy retreated into their eco domes.

            The planet recovered as all the polluters and greedy sorts were locked in their eco domes

            • aerobubble 1.1.1.1.2.1

              So removing the top predator makes the herd better off. Ecology says no. It makes for over population as weak are not removed.

              The global problem is not capitalism, is lazy stupid people like Murdoch who make money parasitically support the richest rich and those richest rich not having the experts to explian why wealth has obligations that invariable benefit all. Is the class war Murdoch and Thaterites waged agaunst society that creates and maintains this crisis. The vulture reptilian class.

              • Draco T Bastard

                So removing the top predator makes the herd better off. Ecology says no. It makes for over population as weak are not removed.

                Ecologically we’ve already moved into that position. The only option we have to fix the issues that it brings is to use our intelligence.

                Also, capitalists may be predators but they actually rely upon having lots of poor people around.

                The global problem is not capitalism

                Yes it is.

                • Colonial Viper

                  I have to shake my head sometimes.

                  Capitalism has been the problem since Washington helped exterminate the Indians for their land, and before.

                  • Draco T Bastard

                    Capitalism has been the problem for 5000 years of recorded history.

                    • aerobubble

                      Capitalismis just wat naturally occurs when there is no government and people need to share resources. It occurs after people realize religionous control stops providing for the people. We will always need to negotiate resource use.

                • aerobubble

                  Rich people need poor people. Tautology. People will always have more than each other. Some better skilled, other with access to land, its a nonsense to conclude that because we are different it means something and so we should not be different, or as you reason.

                  Sure intelligence require arguments hat are not tautologies.

                  • Draco T Bastard

                    Rich people need poor people. Tautology. People will always have more than each other.

                    It’s got nothing to do with people having different amounts but the fact that the rich live on the work of the poor.

                    Some better skilled, other with access to land, its a nonsense to conclude that because we are different it means something and so we should not be different, or as you reason.

                    That’s your words, not mine. In fact, I don’t reason that way at all. In fact I go on the maxim of:
                    We are all different but equal in our differences.

                    • aerobubble

                      . Civilisations require that we all live off each other so it more nonsense to say people who have too much wealth are atypical inliving off the poor, since they are, we all live off the externalities of each other, good and bad. The problem aint that there are rich people, the problem is they are anti-society and we need to change the selection pressure to pick better fix so the richest serve us all again. Otherwise we should not value money and find some other glue to trade with.

            • sabine 1.1.1.1.2.2

              i did love that book and i think it might be time for a re-read.

          • gsays 1.1.1.1.3

            absolutely draco,
            “they can be remved and nobody would notice much.”
            kings need subjects, subjects don’t need kings.

            or managers need workers, workers don’t need managers.

    • Colonial Viper 1.2

      Was that not the intended outcome?

      That was my first thought, too. Trickle down has accomplished exactly what was intended – a PR meme providing political cover for the extreme neoliberal theft engineered by the 0.1% and 0.01%.

    • whateva next? 1.3

      I wish we could use that one picture at election time, BIG BILLBOARDS around the country, it says all we need to say about it. Perfect.

  2. Brigid 2

    MINCOME, a Canadian Guaranteed Annual Income field experiment ran in the province of Manitoba between 1974 and 1979.
    This is the report Evelyn Forget in February 2011 wrote.
    http://public.econ.duke.edu/~erw/197/forget-cea%20%282%29.pdf

    There doesn’t seem to be anything but good come of a UBI

    This report was written 5 years ago. There really doesn’t need to be any more wittering on about whether or not the UBI is good for all mankind.

  3. ianmac 3

    I do think that NZ’s super rich probably laugh in the same way. “We very rich folk look down on you poor folk. We attend elegant exclusive venues and you peasants are excluded. Meanwhile we act indignant at news of those who cheat the taxpayers out of hundreds by abuse of welfare. Our accountants of course make sure our tax bills are minimal.”

    Of course some of us have no envy at all of the super rich.

    • mac1 3.1

      “Of course some of us have no envy at all of the super rich.”

      And the apologists for the rich, the wannabes, the Tory trolls just don’t get that, eh ianmac?

      Anger, yes. A sense of injustice, yes. Pity even…………. but never envy.

      Who wants this said of them? “Look here, you rich people: Weep and groan with anguish because of all the terrible troubles ahead of you.”

      • ianmac 3.1.1

        I have met the children of the very rich. Often they have a sense of elitism which is often encouraged by the elitist school that they attend. But they already have the trimmings and trinkets which some believe show status. So where do they go from there?
        In the Arab Emirates the families are often very very rich. The teens often say why should I do well at school when my life is already bought and paid for?

        • whateva next? 3.1.1.1

          …and I work in care of older people, and I can tell you money makes NO difference to how we age, it is how we feel about those around us, and how we feel about who we are as a person, that makes a huge difference!

      • Draco T Bastard 3.1.2

        And the apologists for the rich, the wannabes, the Tory trolls just don’t get that

        The wannabes are the ones that are envious. They then project that envy onto everyone else to excuse and hide their own.

        So, when someone says that others are just envious of the rich know that they’re only talking about their own envy.

        • mac1 3.1.2.1

          “So, when someone says that others are just envious of the rich know that they’re only talking about their own envy.”

          QFT

          ianmac “In the Arab Emirates the families are often very very rich. The teens often say why should I do well at school when my life is already bought and paid for?”

          Another burden for the rich. How to make life meaningful for oneself and one’s children. How to avoid “affluenza” with which one Ethan Couch now residing in jail has to deal. How to deal with anomie. Terrible troubles, indeed.

    • Jono 3.2

      Yeah Ian, these super rich are laughing at all of us. They have had the deck stacked in there favour for so long… we need to bring back some egalitarian values in NZ.

  4. Bill 4

    Well, ideologues sold the idea of ‘trickle down’ quite successfully. It’d be nice to say it’s run its course, but austerity and privatisation seem to be jogging along quite nicely.

    On UBI, the dynamic that statists (parliamentary ‘leftists’) don’t seem to have picked up on, is that without compulsion, the whole exploitative core of capitalism crumples. That’s a good thing to my mind, but those who benefit from it, well…that’s their battleground and those interested in UBI could do worse than strategise around the point of exploitation ahead of time.

    We’ve already had the ‘but people are work-shy’ nonsense kicked onto the slates by empirical evidence, but that won’t be the end of it. Also, are statists prepared to stand on platforms of anti-capitalism as opposed to platforms advocating for reform? What percentage of statists are even aware that a UBI is a fundamentally anti-capitalist concept?

    And when UBI is introduced, will statists insist that the resulting economy (because there can be no market economy without exploitation) is in no way shape or form a command economy? I ask that because the easy next step from market economy is to command economy, but that wouldn’t constitute any kind of forward step.

    • How is a UBI a step towards a command economy? A command economy requires centralised decisions on supply.

      A UBI, instead, supports decentralised decisions on demand and has no net impact on supply. If anything, it’s a more decentralised system than social-democratic capitalism is, as the direct support to citizens will remove some of the need to interfere with the supply side of non-monopoly businesses.

      There absolutely can be a market economy without exploitation, as all a market economy explicitly requires is relatively strong competition of supply and dynamic demand. The question is whether there can be a growing market economy without exploitation as opposed to a sustainable and resilient economy. I’d be willing to bet the answer is “only at the expense of other nations.”

      • Bill 4.1.1

        It isn’t necessarily a step towards a command economy. But since most people view production and distribution only in terms of either market or command, then it could become an accidental default due to an inability to imagine anything else.

        I disagree with your assertion that a market economy is possible in the absence of exploitation; it’s a (the?) central tenet of a market economy.

        Another foundation of a market economy is growth. There is absolutely no way that an economy can be geared to steady state or no growth, and still by any sensible standard or measure, be said to be market economy.

        I’ll put it this way. All economies concern themselves with supply and demand (production and distribution) – it’s not a special feature of market economies. What is a special feature of a market economy is the drivers or incentives it places around production and distribution.

        Production must only be profitable. And so exploitation and compulsion to enter into exploitative labour relationships become the norm. That happened, if history teaches us anything, after periods of brutal coercion… enclosure, colonisation etc.

        Take those aforementioned market economy drivers away and production will have to be driven by other criteria. One way, and like I say, I fear this will happen by default, is produce by diktat (a command economy).

        • Draco T Bastard 4.1.1.1

          I disagree with your assertion that a market economy is possible in the absence of exploitation; it’s a (the?) central tenet of a market economy.

          No it’s not. It’s the central tenet of capitalism. A UBI would improve the market system while destroying capitalism.

          Another foundation of a market economy is growth.

          Nope. The market system is about distribution of scarce resources. It should automatically adjust to the limited resources available and thus doesn’t require growth.

          Growth is something that capitalism needs to cover the Ponzi Scheme that is our monetary system that has private banks creating interest bearing money.

          What is a special feature of a market economy is the drivers or incentives it places around production and distribution.

          That’s not ‘market-economy’ but capitalism as it seeks to accumulate all the wealth into the hands of the few.

          • Bill 4.1.1.1.1

            No interest in running down a rabbit hole of semantics.

            So I’ll just state that capitalism can survive without a market economy (eg -Lenin’s state capitalism), but that there is no historical example of a market economy surviving without the political underpinnings and over-archings of capitalism (ie – the enabling institutional framework).

            • Draco T Bastard 4.1.1.1.1.1

              but that there is no historical example of a market economy surviving without the political underpinnings and over-archings of capitalism

              That doesn’t mean that we can’t create one as we seem to be stuck with a market system for now.

              • Bill

                No market economy would survive without institutional heft acting as ‘enforcer’.

                Why else would people voluntarily enter into work arrangements predicated on their exploitation in an economy geared towards maximum profit for the exploiters?

                More to the point, why the fuck would you want such an economy to be able to exist ‘on its own two feet’?

                And Draco. Even the market fundamentalists understand that they need the coercive capability of the state to stand over their ‘free market’. You know why? Because no fucker is going to participate in that state of affairs unless they’re compelled, or unless there’s an implicit threat accompanying any idea of non-participation.

                And I know that’s all too nuanced for you; that for you, capitalism is just economic arrangements and the market economy exists in some big blind spot hung over with neon flashing signs that spell out the word ‘capitalism’.

                • Draco T Bastard

                  Why else would people voluntarily enter into work arrangements predicated on their exploitation in an economy geared towards maximum profit for the exploiters?

                  They wouldn’t and we wouldn’t want them to.

                  More to the point, why the fuck would you want such an economy to be able to exist ‘on its own two feet’?

                  I don’t.

                  You’re the one stating that a market economy must have compulsion. I’m saying that it doesn’t need to – if you get rid of the private ownership that is capitalism.

                  • Add to that the necessity borne by the climate crisis that we significantly sacrifice two or three of the following four:

                    * Inflationary capitalism
                    * High population
                    * Carbon emission to enable development
                    * Eating meat

                    …and you better HOPE me and Draco are right, or you’re potentially stuck advocating some sort of government programs to reduce birthrates internationally, zero industrial carbon internationally within the next few decades, and everyone going mostly vegan, at least if you want the next generation to have a decent rate of survival.

                    • Bill

                      Abolish the market.
                      Bring emissions from fossil down to zero really fast. (We get two for the price of one with that one, since plummeting emissions kills the market anyway).

                      Over population is a secondary problem, and one that we won’t have to deal with if we don’t crash carbon emissions.

                      Depending on how and where meat is sourced, it can have a lower impact on resources and the climate than many vegan foodstuffs.

                    • Plummeting emissions for industry doesn’t kill the market, as there are already practical electrical solutions for most industrial equipment. (heavy duty and long-distance transport are about the only things that haven’t been solved AFAIK) It tanks the market for fossil fuels and creates a much more competitive market for things like lithium and photovoltaic panels. It takes a crisis of confidence to actually tank the market.

                      Overpopulation is part of carbon emissions, especially when combined with animal agriculture.

                      Estimates that put vegan foodstuffs as higher-impact than meat generally rely on either comparable usage of processed foodstuffs (which are unnecessary luxuries that are an unbalancing part of any diet they’re in) or not costing the externalities for animal products and vegetables the same way. (eg. not costing the impact of feed for animals, or costing clearing space for vegetables but not clearing space for grass for animals) Vegetarian and vegan diets both make significant impacts on the climate, moreso than abandoning personal vehicle use or buying an EV.

                      If we go zero-carbon from everything except agriculture at the fastest pace possible but still eat meat at current rates and don’t arrest population growth, we will still be in trouble again eventually.

                    • Bill

                      I didn’t say “zero fossil in industry”. I said zero fossil.

                      That’s no electricity from coal or gas, meaning no lights, lap-tops, phones or fridges running from energy derived from fossil. It means no cars, planes, ships or trains running on energy derived from fossil.

                      That’s not me being extreme; it’s what the science is telling us. (From memory), ‘the west’ must be at zero fossil by 2030 to give the world a 50/50 chance of avoiding 2 degrees of warming.

                      I’ve done posts on it if you want to check the years and reduction rates, but I think it currently sits at something approaching a 15% reduction in fossil related CO2 per year until zero. (And no, there is no time available to ‘swap out’ through laying in alternative infrastructure…the building and commissioning takes far too long))

                      The kicker is that since the economy is so hugely reliant on fossil, it can’t sustain that rate of reduction; the market economy tanks which, arguably, is why no-one in a position of power and influence is suggesting doing very much.

                      On population, we could eliminate all the peasants in the world’s poorest countries today (some billions of people) and it wouldn’t make much of a dent in fossil related CO2 emissions. On the other hand, take out something like the richest 5% of humanity and their lifestyle, and fossil related CO2 emissions half.

                      On meat and veganism – and I’m not being ideological on this – I was vegan for about 10 years. Wild meat versus (say) unprocessed soy? Backyard meat versus (say) fields of beans/lentils? I’d agree that industrial farm meat is an arse, but that’s why I said ‘depending’.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      There’s still a chance of less than 2 degrees warming? I reckon that ship has long sailed.

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      That’s no electricity from coal or gas, meaning no lights, lap-tops, phones or fridges running from energy derived from fossil. It means no cars, planes, ships or trains running on energy derived from fossil.

                      We can do that and still have PC, laptops, phones etc.

                      The kicker is that since the economy is so hugely reliant on fossil, it can’t sustain that rate of reduction; the market economy tanks which, arguably, is why no-one in a position of power and influence is suggesting doing very much.

                      That bit is purely wrong. Market economies have been around for better than 2500 years and they didn’t use fossil fuels for better than 90% of it.

                      It really isn’t the market that’s the problem. It’s capitalism that encourages and incentivises private ownership of everything from raw resources through to housing and factories that produces a rentier class. Get rid of that and the market will probably work as well as the economists say it will.

                    • pat

                      “That bit is purely wrong. Market economies have been around for better than 2500 years and they didn’t use fossil fuels for better than 90% of it.”

                      Whether that is true or not what is true is that whatever system was in place didn’t, and couldn’t support 7 plus billion pre industrial revolution and without the carbon rich dense energy we cannot further use and without some miraculous advancement in energy production right now NO system will support 7 plus billion in the near future

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      Whether that is true or not what is true is that whatever system was in place didn’t, and couldn’t support 7 plus billion pre industrial revolution…

                      While that is true it doesn’t mean that the decline of the use of fossil fuels automatically gets rid of the market system.

                    • pat

                      you missed the relevant bit….NO system will support 7 plus billion.

                    • Bill

                      @ CV. I could agree with you that the ship is past the breakwater, but since the breakwater is obscuring our view…

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      NO system will support 7 plus billion.

                      I didn’t miss that bit at all. It’s just irrelevant.

                    • Bill, you can’t have a zero carbon economy with significant consumption of meat since animal agriculture emits so much carbon. (Technically any agriculture at all isn’t carbon neutral, but any solution where we still have a population that needs to eat is going to require at least the emissions from plant-based diets) Zero carbon usually means zero net carbon with most industrial emissions eliminated, agricultural emissions reduced as practical, and the rest offset. I agree that we’d need no emissions from electricity generation and to have industry powered either by electricity, by hand, or (maybe) by animal labour in the long term, just as I don’t think we’ll successfully be able to offset emissions from animal agriculture in the long-term.

                      And yeah, I was comparing meat agriculture (at the high-intensity that would likely be necessary given the assumed 2°-ish rise from our insufficient agreement in Paris and the limits on appropriate farmland that would entail) to vegetable agriculture. Wild meat may be a slightly different deal, I haven’t looked into analysis on that, (presumably the farting and belching still occurs to some degree, so I wouldn’t expect them to be hugely efficient) but it’s certainly not a practical for everyone to feed themselves that way.

                    • pat

                      Irrelevant?…..you mean like holding a committee meeting for millions of angry, starving drowning animals……and expecting them to ignore their immediate position to engage constructively…..what form of animal does that pray tell?

                  • Bill

                    Yeah. What you’re doing is blithely dispensing with all of those things that mark a market economy as distinct from other economies (private property, exploitation, profit, compulsion etc etc) and then insisting that what’s left is a ‘market economy’. It makes coherent discussion well nigh impossible.

                    What I’m referring to as ‘the market’ , you want to call ‘capitalism’. That underestimates the reach and scope of capitalism (it’s political with an economic dimension) and renders the economic and political analysis of both, murky.

                    • The lost sheep

                      Well said Bill.
                      In a world comprised entirely of gradients, a discussion based on the premise there is only black and white is simply nonsense.

                    • I’m sorry Bill, but you really need to look at a dictionary or encyclopaedia for this.

                      You’re using a term that is best used in contrast to terms like “gift economy” or “bartering system” (both of which, btw, still exist in places- hell, arguably the system of international debt among developed nations resembles a gift economy using numbers, as there is an implicit understanding those debts won’t be called in) as shorthand to encompass all of the political-economic implications of a fiat money social-democratic inflationary capitalist system, which from the length of that description you can tell has way more moving parts than just the presence of a dynamic economic market.

                      Just because existing market economies in the modern world have, with rare exceptions, tended to work that way, doesn’t mean it’s a universal rule or the way politics and economics will always work out- hence the rare exceptions. This is like someone in medieval Europe arguing that government and monarchy are synonyms, because arguably the Pope is a King and those countries run by councils don’t count, because (to break with the analogy) non-extractive countries without significant capital like Nauru are importing things.

                    • Bill

                      Just because existing market economies in the modern world have, with rare exceptions, tended to work that way, doesn’t mean it’s a universal rule or the way politics and economics will always work out- hence the rare exceptions

                      Please point me to just one of those rare exceptions where a market economy (and btw, it’s a thoroughly modern phenomenon that simply hasn’t existed at other points in history) – but anyway, point me to a market economy that didn’t operate as a market economy that had all the characteristic hall-marks of a market economy. I don’t for a second think that such an example exists.

                      See, what you’re saying sounds to me like “just because all existing elephants have trunks and always have had trucks, doesn’t mean that all elephants need to have trunks…there are exceptions.”

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      In a world comprised entirely of gradients, a discussion based on the premise there is only black and white is simply nonsense.

                      Bill’s the one arguing in black and white.

                      and btw, it’s a thoroughly modern phenomenon that simply hasn’t existed at other points in history

                      Now that is absolute fucken bullshit.

                      Ancient Egypt? Market economy
                      Ancient Greece? Market economy
                      Ancient Sumer? Birthplace of modern civilisation? Market economy using, of all things, fiat currency (it’s the first recorded instance of it but that’s probably because it’s the earliest known writing).

                      That’s 5000 fucken years of market economics. Still going to call it a “modern phenomenon”?

                      Sure, they were also capitalist but that still doesn’t mean that a market economy has to be capitalist.

                      See, what you’re saying sounds to me like “just because all existing elephants have trunks and always have had trucks, doesn’t mean that all elephants need to have trunks…there are exceptions.”

                      We’re not talking elephants but social constructs that are defined by the ideas that we have. This means that we most definitely can produce a market economy that doesn’t have capitalism. I think it would be the necessary step along the way to not using money at all.

                    • Bill

                      Read through your stuff about Egypt and capitalism etc and decided that rather than waste my breath, I’d just cut to the chase. Sorry Draco, but this is the truth of it. You say
                      (All that went before is)

                      social constructs that are defined by the ideas that we have

                      And you have none. No idea at all.

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      And you have none. No idea at all.

                      No Bill, it’s you who have no idea and refuse to listen.

                    • Bill

                      …from the guy who seems to be indicating that all trade is capitalist and that all economies (frameworks for trade) are or were capitalist and/or essentially market economies. sheesh

                    • Bill I literally gave you an example in your last post which you haven’t addressed, so I feel under no onus to drag up every example of a system that’s not a strict fiat money inflationary capitalist example of a market economy for you to just ignore it.

            • Matthew Whitehead 4.1.1.1.1.2

              But we’ve been running high-scarcity economies until last century. This is the first occasion we’ve had where we’ve run into a political necessity to adapt our economic systems and are globally generating a low-scarcity amount of resources. (ie. if we worked out distribution and profitability issues, we could definitely feed everyone and probably lift everyone out of poverty, or maybe at least out of extreme poverty)

              We’ve had two economic systems experimented with so far: inflationary capitalism, which has caused climate change, inter-generational theft and poverty, wealth inequality, and is extracting wealth from all but the most politically powerful nations, largely back into the USA and Europe, although largely to the elite. We’ve also tried authoritarian command economies masquerading as communism, which lost the cold war and caused mass poverty. Both experiments have objectively failed and we are in a time when we will need to transition to something new. The question is what exactly it is.

              That’s not semantics.

              • Bill

                Have both production and distribution determined democratically. If we did that, we’d have no profit, no authoritarianism, no exploitation, no elites….

                • The lost sheep

                  Have both production and distribution determined democratically.

                  What would you propose as the specific democratic structure that supports that Bill?

                  • Bill

                    You’re essentially trolling with that comment tls.

                    You don’t want to attempt to apply democratic principles to decision making and would rather insist on having some (presumably) monolithic blue print laid out before you – a blue print that would obviously, in and of itself, preclude any attempt at developing democratic procedures or systems – then fine….fuck off and be a minion.

                    For the answer to your trolling, go back and re-read the exchange from yesterday or the day before. Nothing has changed on that front.

                    • The lost sheep

                      I’m presuming nothing Bill.
                      Just waiting for someone to give a straight forward answer to a straightforward question.

                      As far as I can tell, no one here, yourself included, has put up a concrete, specific, and workable alternative to the current system.
                      All i see is smoke and mirrors.

                      So when you say ‘yesterday, or the day before’, sorry if i missed it, but give me a link to something specific?

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      As far as I can tell, no one here, yourself included, has put up a concrete, specific, and workable alternative to the current system.

                      I have and it’s even still a market system. It just gets rid of capitalism.

                    • The lost sheep

                      You’ve gone as far as a vague concept of ‘participatory democracy’ Draco, but I’ve now asked you for specific details on how that works 3 times, and you have not answered.

                      So exactly how would your participatory democracy make decisions on the elements of the rule of law? Use of land or water for instance?

                      How would your system assure compliance with the laws?

                    • Bill

                      I’m referring to the exchange (can’t remember the thread) where you asked if there would be consequences if you and your mates formed some bureaucratic form of governance.

                      My answer to that applies to rules around trade too.

                      But to signpost possible procedures for production and distribution…if a community from within society needs x amount of product y, and production of that product is being undertaken, then the community communicates with those producing product y, and from that dialogue, it’s determined whether (among other things) their need outstrips total production capacity. If it does, then options are explored by all the communities wanting given amounts of product y, and working alongside the producers, and perhaps producers of other compatible or alternative products, solutions are found.

                      If you want the unconvoluted version – society talks to itself and figures out what it needs and what it can provide.

                    • The lost sheep

                      @ Draco

                      Not going to answer again eh Draco?

                      That will be because ‘participatory democracy’ rolls nicely off the
                      tongue as a warm and fuzzy concept, but when you get beyond the good vibes, there are some problems.

                      Lets assume that even in your utopian workers state, there are some matters that effect us all, and we must find a social consensus on.
                      Something like whether or not we place limits on the right to fish, and what those limits might be.
                      Lets leave aside the questions of how we frame the discussion and present it to ‘the people’, and gather the ‘result’ of the participatory conversation (some big difficulties even there when you think it through…)

                      But presuming we’ve had the discussion and come down to a set of defined issues and potential solutions, how do we as a society decide exactly what we are going to implement as our laws around fishing rights?

                      If ALL of us unanimously agree on the proposed measures, then no problem. But what if 1% of us don’t agree? What if 20% don’t agree? What if 20% strongly disagree? What if 51% strongly agree and 49% violently disagree?
                      (Lets leave aside the further difficulty of whether or not we expect those who disagree to abide by the law we decide, and If so, how do we ensure compliance?)

                      So the options are,
                      We all agree. But that’s an impossibility?
                      We do nothing unless we do all agree. But that’s not viable?
                      Or we have some form of rule by majority. But doesn’t that put us well back on the path to what we currently do?

                      I haven’t yet seen anyone who advocates participatory democracy resolve this conundrum?

                    • The lost sheep

                      @Bill
                      If you want the unconvoluted version – society talks to itself and figures out what it needs and what it can provide

                      But isn’t the convoluted process you describe above a real issue Bill? It’s an extremely inefficient use of the resources it would take to get all the talking done that would allow for the complexity of need and production within a large scale society?

                      That’s where the idea of using a universally exchangeable symbol for the value of your production came in? ‘Money’ in fact?
                      It is hard to think of a more efficient way of having that conversation?

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      Not going to answer again eh Draco?

                      This is one example

                      * Policies are set by the people rather than by government. In fact, I see ‘government’ being removed from use. The people govern
                      * Parliaments role would be to bring issues and the research to the people and then the people would decide. They would be responsible for the day to day running of the country and set out the wording of the policies and changes to the wording of existing policies. If the people don’t like a change that parliament does then it can be taken to referendum
                      * Voting would be compulsory. Voting is a duty, not a right
                      * Constitution to become supreme law but one that can be changed by the people but even they wouldn’t be able to change the constitution to trample over human or environmental rights
                      * Cities and regions would have their own form of this

                    • The lost sheep

                      Thinking it through a bit further Bill, there is just no way co-ordination of production and need on a micro scale would ever work on anything but a micro scale. A hunter gatherer society for instance.

                      In a society as large and complex as ours, with the unbelievable diversity of need and production across a global scale, the level of co-ordination involved would require a huge amount of planning and effort.
                      If you were going to do that without an abstract mechanism like money, you would require an organisational body of a size and complexity to match. A fucking big Bureaucracy no less.

                    • The lost sheep

                      @ Draco.
                      As I said, you are well back down the path towards what we have already?
                      When you say ‘The People’ will govern…it is actually the majority of the people who would govern?

                      So if you lived in a country where 51 % were Right Wing and 49% Left, it would be the right wing that was governing?

                    • Bill

                      @tls

                      There’s too many potentially expansive points that have been made in intervening comments to go into here. I’ll just limit myself to saying two things.

                      There is nothing wrong with money as a mark of exchange. Problems arise when the mark of exchange takes on a value though. What if money merely signified a that social interaction around exchange had taken place?

                      Second point is to do with complexity. Look around you. All of the worlds complexities, and they work out kind of perfectly, arise from fairly simply initial conditions, ie – complexity is never enforced, but rather, generates naturally from below and seems to be determined by initial, simpler, configurations.

                      We, humans, seem to be stupidly hung up on imposing order or managing complexity, and if we’re going to look at that dispassionately, we’d have to concede that what we achieve at the end of all our pain, is disorder and disharmony – somewhat ‘managed’ chaos.

                    • The lost sheep

                      @Bill

                      There is nothing wrong with money as a mark of exchange. Problems arise when the mark of exchange takes on a value though. What if money merely signified a that social interaction around exchange had taken place?
                      Not sure I fully understand you here – are you saying that any interchange would be of an equal value to any other interchange?

                      We, humans, seem to be stupidly hung up on imposing order or managing complexity, and if we’re going to look at that dispassionately, we’d have to concede that what we achieve at the end of all our pain, is disorder and disharmony – somewhat ‘managed’ chaos.
                      I wouldn’t put it like that at all Bill!
                      The degree to which we have managed to create order out of chaos is truly remarkable. Not saying there is no chaos or even that there is more order than chaos. But starting with the person who first took a rock from ‘chaos’ into a knife, or fire from ‘chaos’ into warmth and protection, we have ‘organized’ our world with a degree of complexity and diversity that way exceeds ‘somewhat’!

                      And we do it not because we are ‘stupid’, but because we want to improve our lives. Having all the food you need and being well housed and having all your children survive and living to 80 are not things that would have happened without order and complexity.
                      The cave sucked, and we wanted out of the chaos.

                      So here we are discussing through the internet our visions for our future.
                      How much order and complexity does it require just to make that happen Bill?
                      This computer I’m using for instance. The long continuum of technology that led to it’s development, the obtaining of the raw materials to build it, the construction of the many various parts, the shipping of it around the world through planes and ships, the infrastructure required for people everywhere to use them and connect….etc bloody etc.

                      To make all that line up and enable my ability to type this comment requires a level of complexity and management that is absolutely mind blowing! And every single step in that process is a step away from chaos.

                      So how far could you degrade that complexity before we could not do this Bill?
                      How far towards this ability do you think we could get by ‘societies talking to each other?’
                      And do you imagine that people want to live without the benefits a very complex and managed society brings us?

                      I don’t, and for that reason, I believe that realistically, any new society you propose will need to be capable of sustaining at least our current level of complexity and organisation. If it doesn’t, you are only going to gather a very small amount of support for introducing it.

                    • Bill

                      Obviously (or at least I thought it was obvious) I was referring to non-material complexities. Silicon needs to be manipulated to give us computers. That’s a no-brainer. Clay needs to have processes applied to it to get bricks and so on.

                      But things like social complexity are a completely different beast. Immense levels of complexity arise from pretty simple initial conditions…just look at the world, both in terms of single species and interaction between species or between species and environments. There is no imposition of order from above. In human terms, when attempts are made to dictate a given social order from above, not only is humanity’s vitality diminished through political processes that essentially deny free will, but unexpected and deleterious consequences occur that hit at an individual and societal level.

                      Musical sound provides a non-living example that has been demonstrated in instances where simple initial sound components have been overlaid and looped, producing unexpected harmonics and what not.

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      As I said, you are well back down the path towards what we have already?

                      Nope because the power is taken from a few and distributed over the entire population equally.

                      So if you lived in a country where 51 % were Right Wing and 49% Left, it would be the right wing that was governing?

                      It would be the majority voting for the policies that get the policies into legislation. It wouldn’t really be left/right at that point because we, as a single people, agree more with each other than our present political system indicates.

                      How many people would vote for 0% interest loans? I’d say a fairly large majority because most people don’t benefit from getting interest payments but they do suffer having to pay them.

                      IMO, our present political system creates more division than is healthy and is actually there.

                      If you were going to do that without an abstract mechanism like money, you would require an organisational body of a size and complexity to match. A fucking big Bureaucracy no less.

                      No we wouldn’t. In fact I think we could with a hell of a lot less bureaucracy than we have now because we would no longer be competing with each other. Competition increases bureaucracy.
                      Or, as you put it: And do you imagine that people want to live without the benefits a very complex and managed society brings us?
                      We already have a fucken big bureaucracy.

                      We don’t need a bureaucracy, we need a machine that takes into account the actual real availability of resources and shows us the effect of using those resources.

                      Not sure I fully understand you here – are you saying that any interchange would be of an equal value to any other interchange?

                      No, he’s saying that money is a tool that, in and of itself, it has no value. We’ve tried to give it a value by charging interest or by associating it with a valuable commodity (gold etc) but that has, invariably, failed.

                    • The lost sheep

                      It would be the majority voting for the policies that get the policies into legislation.

                      Yes Draco. So if you brought that plan in tomorrow in NZ, and you introduced a policy to say, massively increase tax on the top 20% of earners in order to provide a generous UBI to everyone….
                      the same 57% people who currently vote NAT/ACT/NZ FIRST/ would vote it down.

                      But you’d be happy, because the majority would have had their say?

                    • The lost sheep

                      Clay needs to have processes applied to it to get bricks and so on.
                      But things like social complexity are a completely different beast.

                      Are they Bill?
                      Can you give me an example of a society with a simple unstructured free form association of individuals that has produced very complex technological innovation and production?

                    • Bill

                      Define ‘free’. No-one is completely free. We have physical limitations and psychological limitations. And who mentioned unstructured by the way? I certainly didn’t.

                      We have limitations placed around us by political or cultural factors. When those cultural or political limitations impose themselves – when they are a remote, top down blunt insistence on compliance, then we get widespread dysfunction…just look around you…the prevalence of mental illnesses, addiction, people behaving shit to others (violences of various sorts) or people just being behaviourly fucked up…and that’s because the would be gods always create fucked up environments.

                      But when we’re regularily and meaningfully engaged with the on-going development of the culture or political environment we live in; when our environment results from an on-going process that is part and parcel of our daily, individually empowered, lives…

                    • The lost sheep

                      You can’t give me an example then.
                      That doesn’t mean of course that you are wrong and that your vision might not be viable.

                      But for me, unless you can show me where it has actually worked, or give me a far more detailed outline of how such a society would organise and sustain something as complex as our modern technological society, I’m going to consider the concept as purely theoretical.

                      Until you have a compelling argument, I think you’ll find most people will also.

                    • McFlock

                      There’s something slightly off-kilter about dismissing something as “purely theoretical” when discussing the origins of technological advancement.

                    • Bill

                      I’ve essentially claimed that everyone has a capacity to make meaningful contributions to how their society is ordered/configured. Now, if that’s theoretical, then it’s no less theoretical than to continue endorsing a particular social configuration, on the implied or presumed basis that there’s ‘somes that knows better’ (our betters) and we is all a bit stoopid or dumb to have or exercise a meaningful say in how we live.

                      And the difference between the two positions?

                      One is elitist, dismissive and a tad misanthropic. The other affirms or suggests peoples’ capabilities and worth.

                      An initial condition I’ve suggested, that would act as a determinant on whatever systems or processes people develop, is that no-one has a right to unilaterally impose a decision (or its effects) on another. Think of that in terms of consent around sex, and then simply extend that basic concept and apply it to all human interactions. Not so difficult to envisage, is it? And not too difficult to understand how that would affect or guide the characteristics of various decision making processes pertaining to an economy or a polity either.

                    • The lost sheep

                      systems or processes people develop, is that no-one has a right to unilaterally impose a decision (or its effects) on another

                      So if the majority had developed a ‘system’ for regulating the amount of fish you could take from a particular resource….any individual who did not agree with that decision could ignore it?

          • Matthew Whitehead 4.1.1.1.2

            +1 to Draco. A resiliency/sustainability market economy based on growth-through-efficiency-only is still a market economy, as I said, being a market economy doesn’t explicitly require a growth trend. (as in inflationary capitalism) The question of how viable non-inflationary economies are would be interesting, if it weren’t a necessity to move away from them within the next couple decades to prevent catastrophic levels of climate change.

            All market economies require is dynamic regulation by supply and demand, and a free price system. (ie. no price-setting by government, prices are determined by suppliers and then paid or not paid by consumers) Anything extra is political or business ideology.

            Hell, you could have a “communist” market economy where people choose which industries they want to work in and sell the results of their labour by free price, either directly or to market intermediaries whose labour would then be selling things effectively with the maximum practical markup, with nobody actually owning any capital, (ie. any actual factories, markets, etc… would be public goods accessible to all) and people still exchanging personal money as a way to value labour and goods. That’s still a market economy, it’s just not a capitalistic one.

    • aerobubble 4.2

      Work shy nonsense. The reason Philippines and Scots seek work in our diary sector isn’t because kiwis are unwilling. Housing costs are lower, and the working pop is larger so more motivated, coupled to our higher dollar and you get demand to work here. Where your s.auckland work shy, has no experience of farming, no desire to lock themselves inti a huge debt, and no means of motivating themselves to work for the group most anti them. Sorry but any fool, English, can find the two most opposed and at the opposite ends of the country and the economy and make a cheap margunally racist but obviously class comment. Its not that they are work shy, its that they are screwed over without option and choice. Build public transport, build homes, build motivation building choices and they will come.

      • Michael 4.2.1

        I had no idea New Zealand’s diary sector even existed, let alone that it was propped up by Filipino and Scottish wordsmiths. You really can learn something new every day.

  5. Wayne 5

    I read the article cited. I note the graphic shows that tax havens include Germany, Netherlands, Ireland, Singapore, the US and the UK, as well as the usual suspects. Presumably Switzerland is also a tax haven. But the graphic did not include Australia or New Zealand.

    I understand that is because these jurisdictions (the major nations) allow a non-resident to have an entity in the jurisdiction (a company or a trust) but they do not tax the income of the entity provided it is not sourced within the jurisdiction. Conceptually this is the same as the NZ non resident trust system.

    I also noted that the graphic showed that the greatest users were Eastern Europe, the old Soviet Union states, China and various third world countries.

    As I have noted previously, this is less about avoiding tax (many of these countries have low tax rates, typically much lower than in western countries) and much more about getting assets out beyond the reach of the government.

    Think of Russian oligarchs and Chinese millionaires/billionaires.

    So the question remains, how easy is it for people who are resident in western countries to actually evade/avoid tax. Most western jurisdictions have pretty robust rules around residents accounting for their income, whether it is sourced locally or from overseas. Of course some industries are naturals for tax avoidance/evasion.

    Traditionally this was international shipping, commodity trading, international insurance and finance. I presume these days it also covers various providers of IT services. The common theme being that it was often hard to say that the service was provided in a particular country.

    To take an old fashioned example of an international shipping company. If the company is registered in Panama, and the ships registered in Panama, where is the shipping revenue derived? Presumably it would be in Panama.

    However, the shareholders of the shipping company are rarely Panamanians, but would be citizens of an OECD nation. They would typically set up up additional shelf companies in Panama that would effectively convert revenue into capital. Thus the shareholders would avoid paying tax in their own state, since capital is rarely taxed. The secrecy laws of Panama would make it hard for the tax authorities of the relevant OECD nation to know what had occurred.

    • One Anonymous Bloke 5.1

      You forgot money laundering for organised crime and terrorism, Wayne. Did they slip your mind? Were you personally involved in the 2011 legislative changes by any chance?

  6. Steve Wrathall 6

    So an economic non-theory that exists only in your minds has “failed”? Who knew?

  7. Ad 7

    A really basic problem about poverty is consciousness of its existence.

    I’ll confess my comments below are self-descriptive.

    We can’t see it because of the degree of stratification that exists that stops people of the precariat class.

    We can’t see it because we drive cars. This is the most basic reality-prophylactic. People with salaries have car parks, so they never have to encounter the public realm between home and office. The lived reality of faces and hustle on the street is rare to touch.

    We can’t see it because our cities are divided up into large blocks of housing, retail, and business. Only those who come into town and dare to rattle their cups outside Queen Street Louis Vuitton get noticed. Most poverty is within the grind of the middle and outer suburbs, in the suburban grind.

    Even our open-air markets have massive class bias. There ain’t too much intersection between the Otara markets and the Titirangi markets, or – even closer – between Wellington Nosh and the soup kitchen the nuns run just one road over.

    We may see it in the media and in graphs, but we very rarely touch and feel it, so it’s hard to make it feel important. There’s a lot that actively assists our blindness.

    • Draco T Bastard 7.1

      +1

    • Bill 7.2

      Not so sure it’s that important that you (we) break out of our various prophylactics (car as johnny bag – love it 🙂 )and see or understand specific instances of poverty so much as realise that there is absolutely no way we can eradicate poverty while living the life we do insofar as that life supports an economic framework that makes poverty inevitable.

      Reforms and various policies of redistribution can round the edges of it, but leaving basic market mechanisms and incentives in place means that poverty will always be a reality for some number of people.

  8. gsays 8

    Well from one neo-lib fallacy to another.
    The rising tide analogy.
    Ironically a ubi may be the tool to lift all boats.

  9. Henry Filth 9

    Trickle up worked quite well in the 1950s and 1960s. People still got rich, but a h*ll of a lot more got better off.

    Trouble is, it’s quite difficult to replicate that situation – stability after decades of turmoil, the satisfaction of huge pent-up demand.

    Maybe a clever economist at Treasury could help.

    • One Anonymous Bloke 9.1

      quite difficult

      Oh well, better give up then 🙄

      • Henry Filth 9.1.1

        Why give up? Because it’s difficult? What sort of attitude is that? Happy with the way things are? It sounds like it.

        The world is a much better place when wealth trickles up, rather than trickles down.

        • One Anonymous Bloke 9.1.1.1

          The premise – that better conditions are difficult to replicate – is false: there are so many current real world examples and help is at hand.

          Certainly it appears difficult for the National Party, and what a low benchmark that is.

  10. Colonial Viper 10

    The thing which staggers me is that it was obvious by the 1990s in the UK and the USA that trickledown was a failure.

    And in the 2000s NZ covered up the failure of trickledown with huge levels of private indebtedness.

    Why is the Left fighting the last war.

    • Craig H 10.1

      Trickle down has been known to be a failure for hundreds of years, not just since the 1990s.

      • Colonial Viper 10.1.1

        not quite; in the past the elites never promised that any of their wealth would go to the commoners.

  11. Michael 11

    It’s all the more disappointing then that Andrew Little blamed his dire poll ratings (and Labour’s) on the tepid discussion of Universal Basic Income at last month’s Future of Work conference. Unless and until Labour reconnects with its base it might as well stay in Opposition; it is certainly of no benefit to us in Government.

    • One Anonymous Bloke 11.1

      “No benefit” is still better than the National Party’s incompetence and hostility.

      • Colonial Viper 11.1.1

        Will voters see “not as shit” as being motivating enough a story to turn out for on election day. Dont think so.

        • One Anonymous Bloke 11.1.1.1

          That presupposes Michael’s characterisation is accurate. My point is that even if it were, a Labour government is a vast improvement on the slow civil war that National pursues.

          Edit: unless, for example, you think the difference between 2.7% unemployment and 5.7% is immaterial. Maybe you want the Labour Party to die in a ditch: that justifies inflicting the National Party upon the country?* Yeah nah.

          *let’s face it, the petit bourgeois won’t bear the brunt, eh.

          • Colonial Viper 11.1.1.1.1

            the characterisation that Labour needs to reconnect with its base in order to be relevant?

            That’s not an unreasonable proposition. I havent seen much better with regards to why Labour continues to struggle quarter after quarter.

            • One Anonymous Bloke 11.1.1.1.1.1

              No, the characterisation that states there’s no benefit to NZ from Labour helping form a government.

              But you knew that. Toodles.

              • Colonial Viper

                Michael talked about Labour reconnecting with its base. Or not as the case may be.

                That’s what I am referring to.

                • Michael

                  OAB makes a serious point: is it better to have a National-lite government, headed up by “Labour”, rather than an authentic version, on the grounds that the “lite” version is likely (hopefully, possibly) to be less beastly than the other? That was, effectively, the state of play during the Clark government years and I voted for that government every time, in spite of my misgivings (that grew every year that government was in office, BTW). Today, I don’t think it is worth letting a National-lite government back. Our problems have grown in their magnitude, while our political class (in general, but Labour in particular) grows even more remote from the people and more disdainful and contemptuous of their needs (some honourable exceptions to this, notably within the Greens but one or two within Labour, still).

                  • Kiwiri

                    Cheers, Michael, for that thought-stirring comment.

                  • ianmac

                    Read somewhere this week that the Left was winning. The Right has to maintain credibility as voters demand more Leftish solutions. Thus our Right has to toss the odd crumb and have to avoid heavy-handed Right solutions.
                    Wonder if after the next election, the National will split into Far Right and Middle Right?

  12. The Other Mike 12

    Another test coming up – this time in Kenya – http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2016/04/14/universal_basic_income_this_nonprofit_is_about_to_test_it_in_a_big_way.html

    ‘In the old days of policymaking by aphorism—give a man a fish, feed him for a day!—simply handing money to the poor was considered an obviously bad idea. How naïve—you can’t just give people money. They’ll stop trying! They’ll just get drunk! The underlying assumption was that the poor weren’t good at making decisions for themselves: Experts had to make the decisions for them.

    As it turns out, that assumption was wrong. Across many contexts and continents, experimental tests show that the poor don’t stop trying when they are given money, and they don’t get drunk. Instead, they make productive use of the funds, feeding their families, sending their children to school, and investing in businesses and their own futures. Even a short-term infusion of capital has been shown to significantly improve long-term living standards, improve psychological well-being, and even add one year of life.

    On the other hand, well-intentioned social programs have often fallen short. A recent World Bank study concludes that “skills training and microfinance have shown little impact on poverty or stability, especially relative to program cost.” Moreover, this paternalistic approach is often for naught: Jesse Cunha, for example, finds no differences in health and nutritional outcomes between providing basic foods and providing an equally sized cash program. Most importantly, though, the poor prefer the freedom, dignity, and flexibility of cash transfers—more than 80 percent of the poor in a study in Bihar, India, were willing to sell their food vouchers for cash, many at a 25 to 75 percent discount.

    As a result of this evidence, the winds are shifting in the world of development policy: The European Commission recently suggested that policymakers “always ask the question, ‘Why not cash?’” UN Secretary-General Ban-Ki Moon has argued that “cash-based programming should be the preferred and default method of support.” In other words, the hard evidence behind cash has provoked a healthy debate about how to reform the infrastructure of anti-poverty programming and foreign aid. ‘

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • A worrying sign

    Back in January a StatsNZ employee gave a speech at Rātana on behalf of tangata whenua in which he insulted and criticised the government. The speech clearly violated the principle of a neutral public service, and StatsNZ started an investigation. Part of that was getting an external consultant to examine ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 hours ago
  • Are we fine with 47.9% home-ownership by 2048?

    Renting for life: Shared ownership initiatives are unlikely to slow the slide in home ownership by much. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy today are:A Deloitte report for Westpac has projected Aotearoa’s home-ownership rate will ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    11 hours ago
  • Let's Win This

    You're broken down and tiredOf living life on a merry go roundAnd you can't find the fighterBut I see it in you so we gonna walk it outAnd move mountainsWe gonna walk it outAnd move mountainsAnd I'll rise upI'll rise like the dayI'll rise upI'll rise unafraidI'll rise upAnd I'll ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    12 hours ago
  • Waimahara: The Singing Spirit of Water

    There’s been a change in Myers Park. Down the steps from St. Kevin’s Arcade, past the grassy slopes, the children’s playground, the benches and that goat statue, there has been a transformation. The underpass for Mayoral Drive has gone from a barren, grey, concrete tunnel, to a place that thrums ...
    Greater AucklandBy Connor Sharp
    13 hours ago
  • The Kākā’s Pick 'n' Mix for Tuesday, July 23

    TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 7:00 am on Tuesday, July 23 are:Deep Dive: Penlink: where tolling rhetoric meets reality BusinessDesk-$$$’s Oliver LewisScoop: Te Pūkenga plans for regional polytechs leak out ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    14 hours ago
  • The Kākā’s Journal of Record for Tuesday, July 23

    TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Tuesday, July 23, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:Health: Shane Reti announced the Board of Te Whatu Ora- Health New Zealand was being replaced with Commissioner Lester Levy ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    15 hours ago
  • HealthNZ and Luxon at cross purposes over budget blowout

    Health NZ warned the Government at the end of March that it was running over Budget. But the reasons it gave were very different to those offered by the Prime Minister yesterday. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon blamed the “botched merger” of the 20 District Health Boards (DHBs) to create Health ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    16 hours ago
  • 2500-3000 more healthcare staff expected to be fired, as Shane Reti blames Labour for a budget defic...

    Long ReadKey Summary: Although National increased the health budget by $1.4 billion in May, they used an old funding model to project health system costs, and never bothered to update their pre-election numbers. They were told during the Health Select Committees earlier in the year their budget amount was deficient, ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    18 hours ago
  • Might Kamala Harris be about to get a 'stardust' moment like Jacinda Ardern?

    As a momentous, historic weekend in US politics unfolded, analysts and commentators grasped for precedents and comparisons to help explain the significance and power of the choice Joe Biden had made. The 46th president had swept the Democratic party’s primaries but just over 100 days from the election had chosen ...
    PunditBy Tim Watkin
    23 hours ago
  • Solutions Interview: Steven Hail on MMT & ecological economics

    TL;DR: I’m casting around for new ideas and ways of thinking about Aotearoa’s political economy to find a few solutions to our cascading and self-reinforcing housing, poverty and climate crises.Associate Professor runs an online masters degree in the economics of sustainability at Torrens University in Australia and is organising ...
    The KakaBy Steven Hail
    1 day ago
  • Reported back

    The Finance and Expenditure Committee has reported back on National's Local Government (Water Services Preliminary Arrangements) Bill. The bill sets up water for privatisation, and was introduced under urgency, then rammed through select committee with no time even for local councils to make a proper submission. Naturally, national's select committee ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Vandrad the Viking, Christopher Coombes, and Literary Archaeology

    Some years ago, I bought a book at Dunedin’s Regent Booksale for $1.50. As one does. Vandrad the Viking (1898), by J. Storer Clouston, is an obscure book these days – I cannot find a proper online review – but soon it was sitting on my shelf, gathering dust alongside ...
    1 day ago
  • Gordon Campbell On The Biden Withdrawal

    History is not on the side of the centre-left, when Democratic presidents fall behind in the polls and choose not to run for re-election. On both previous occasions in the past 75 years (Harry Truman in 1952, Lyndon Johnson in 1968) the Democrats proceeded to then lose the White House ...
    WerewolfBy lyndon
    1 day ago
  • Joe Biden's withdrawal puts the spotlight back on Kamala and the USA's complicated relatio...

    This is a free articleCoverageThis morning, US President Joe Biden announced his withdrawal from the Presidential race. And that is genuinely newsworthy. Thanks for your service, President Biden, and all the best to you and yours.However, the media in New Zealand, particularly the 1News nightly bulletin, has been breathlessly covering ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    1 day ago
  • Why we have to challenge our national fiscal assumptions

    A homeless person’s camp beside a blocked-off slipped damage walkway in Freeman’s Bay: we are chasing our tail on our worsening and inter-related housing, poverty and climate crises. Photo: Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 day ago
  • Existential Crisis and Damaged Brains

    What has happened to it all?Crazy, some'd sayWhere is the life that I recognise?(Gone away)But I won't cry for yesterdayThere's an ordinary worldSomehow I have to findAnd as I try to make my wayTo the ordinary worldYesterday morning began as many others - what to write about today? I began ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago
  • A speed limit is not a target, and yet…

    This is a guest post from longtime supporter Mr Plod, whose previous contributions include a proposal that Hamilton become New Zealand’s capital city, and that we should switch which side of the road we drive on. A recent Newsroom article, “Back to school for the Govt’s new speed limit policy“, ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    2 days ago
  • The Kākā’s Pick 'n' Mix for Monday, July 22

    TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 7:00 am on Monday, July 22 are:Today’s Must Read: Father and son live in a tent, and have done for four years, in a million ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • The Kākā’s Journal of Record for Monday, July 22

    TL;DR: As of 7:00 am on Monday, July 22, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:US President Joe Biden announced via X this morning he would not stand for a second term.Multinational professional services firm ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #29

    A listing of 32 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, July 14, 2024 thru Sat, July 20, 2024. Story of the week As reflected by preponderance of coverage, our Story of the Week is Project 2025. Until now traveling ...
    2 days ago
  • I'd like to share what I did this weekend

    This weekend, a friend pointed out someone who said they’d like to read my posts, but didn’t want to pay. And my first reaction was sympathy.I’ve already told folks that if they can’t comfortably subscribe, and would like to read, I’d be happy to offer free subscriptions. I don’t want ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    2 days ago
  • For the children – Why mere sentiment can be a misleading force in our lives, and lead to unex...

    National: The Party of ‘Law and Order’ IntroductionThis weekend, the Government formally kicked off one of their flagship policy programs: a military style boot camp that New Zealand has experimented with over the past 50 years. Cartoon credit: Guy BodyIt’s very popular with the National Party’s Law and Order image, ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    2 days ago
  • A friend in uncertain times

    Day one of the solo leg of my long journey home begins with my favourite sound: footfalls in an empty street. 5.00 am and it’s already light and already too warm, almost.If I can make the train that leaves Budapest later this hour I could be in Belgrade by nightfall; ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • The Chaotic World of Male Diet Influencers

    Hi,We’ll get to the horrific world of male diet influencers (AKA Beefy Boys) shortly, but first you will be glad to know that since I sent out the Webworm explaining why the assassination attempt on Donald Trump was not a false flag operation, I’ve heard from a load of people ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    3 days ago
  • It's Starting To Look A Lot Like… Y2K

    Do you remember Y2K, the threat that hung over humanity in the closing days of the twentieth century? Horror scenarios of planes falling from the sky, electronic payments failing and ATMs refusing to dispense cash. As for your VCR following instructions and recording your favourite show - forget about it.All ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 days ago
  • Bernard’s Saturday Soliloquy for the week to July 20

    Climate Change Minister Simon Watts being questioned by The Kākā’s Bernard Hickey.TL;DR: My top six things to note around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the week to July 20 were:1. A strategy that fails Zero Carbon Act & Paris targetsThe National-ACT-NZ First Coalition Government finally unveiled ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • Pharmac Director, Climate Change Commissioner, Health NZ Directors – The latest to quit this m...

    Summary:As New Zealand loses at least 12 leaders in the public service space of health, climate, and pharmaceuticals, this month alone, directly in response to the Government’s policies and budget choices, what lies ahead may be darker than it appears. Tui examines some of those departures and draws a long ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    4 days ago
  • Flooding Housing Policy

    The Minister of Housing’s ambition is to reduce markedly the ratio of house prices to household incomes. If his strategy works it would transform the housing market, dramatically changing the prospects of housing as an investment.Leaving aside the Minister’s metaphor of ‘flooding the market’ I do not see how the ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    4 days ago
  • A Voyage Among the Vandals: Accepted (Again!)

    As previously noted, my historical fantasy piece, set in the fifth-century Mediterranean, was accepted for a Pirate Horror anthology, only for the anthology to later fall through. But in a good bit of news, it turned out that the story could indeed be re-marketed as sword and sorcery. As of ...
    4 days ago
  • The Kākā's Chorus for Friday, July 19

    An employee of tobacco company Philip Morris International demonstrates a heated tobacco device. Photo: Getty ImagesTL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy on Friday, July 19 are:At a time when the Coalition Government is cutting spending on health, infrastructure, education, housing ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • The Kākā’s Pick 'n' Mix for Friday, July 19

    TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 8:30 am on Friday, July 19 are:Scoop: NZ First Minister Casey Costello orders 50% cut to excise tax on heated tobacco products. The minister has ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Weekly Roundup 19-July-2024

    Kia ora, it’s time for another Friday roundup, in which we pull together some of the links and stories that caught our eye this week. Feel free to add more in the comments! Our header image this week shows a foggy day in Auckland town, captured by Patrick Reynolds. ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    5 days ago
  • Weekly Climate Wrap: A market-led plan for failure

    TL;DR : Here’s the top six items climate news for Aotearoa this week, as selected by Bernard Hickey and The Kākā’s climate correspondent Cathrine Dyer. A discussion recorded yesterday is in the video above and the audio of that sent onto the podcast feed.The Government released its draft Emissions Reduction ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Tobacco First

    Save some money, get rich and old, bring it back to Tobacco Road.Bring that dynamite and a crane, blow it up, start all over again.Roll up. Roll up. Or tailor made, if you prefer...Whether you’re selling ciggies, digging for gold, catching dolphins in your nets, or encouraging folks to flutter ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • Trump’s Adopted Son.

    Waiting In The Wings: For truly, if Trump is America’s un-assassinated Caesar, then J.D. Vance is America’s Octavian, the Republic’s youthful undertaker – and its first Emperor.DONALD TRUMP’S SELECTION of James D. Vance as his running-mate bodes ill for the American republic. A fervent supporter of Viktor Orban, the “illiberal” prime ...
    5 days ago
  • The Kākā’s Journal of Record for Friday, July 19

    TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Friday, July 19, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:The PSA announced the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) had ruled in the PSA’s favour in its case against the Ministry ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • The Hoon around the week to July 19

    TL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers last night features co-hosts and talking with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent talking about the National-ACT-NZ First Government’s release of its first Emissions Reduction Plan;University of Otago Foreign Relations Professor and special guest Dr Karin von ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #29 2024

    Open access notables Improving global temperature datasets to better account for non-uniform warming, Calvert, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society: To better account for spatial non-uniform trends in warming, a new GITD [global instrumental temperature dataset] was created that used maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to combine the land surface ...
    5 days ago
  • We're back again! Join us for the weekly Hoon on YouTube Live

    Photo by Gabriel Crismariu on UnsplashWe’re back again after our mid-winter break. We’re still with the ‘new’ day of the week (Thursday rather than Friday) when we have our ‘hoon’ webinar with paying subscribers to The Kākā for an hour at 5 pm.Jump on this link on YouTube Livestream for ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Gut Reactions.

    Trump Writes His Own Story: Would the “mainstream” media even try to reflect the horrified reaction of the MAGA crowd to the pop-pop-pop of the would-be assassin’s rifle, and Trump going down? Could it even grasp the sheer elation of the rally-goers seeing their champion rise up and punch the air, still alive, ...
    5 days ago
  • Dodging Bullets.

    Fight! Fight! Fight! Had the assassin’s bullet found its mark and killed Donald Trump, America’s descent into widespread and murderous violence – possibly spiralling-down into civil war – would have been immediate and quite possibly irreparable. The American Republic, upon whose survival liberty and democracy continue to depend, is certainly not ...
    5 days ago
  • 'Corruption First' Strikes Again

    There comes a point in all our lives when we must stop to say, “Enough is enough. We know what’s happening. We are not as stupid or as ignorant as you believe us to be. And making policies that kill or harm our people is not acceptable, Ministers.”Plausible deniability has ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    5 days ago
  • The Kākā's Chorus for Thursday, July 18

    TL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy today are:The inside stories of KiwiRail’s iRex debacle, Westport’s perma-delayed flood scheme and Christchurch’s post-quake sewer rebuild, which assumed no population growth, show just how deeply sceptical senior officials in Treasury, the Ministry of ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • What's that Jack Black?

    Ah-rah, deeSoo-guh-goo-gee-goo-geeGoo-guh fli-goo gee-gooGuh fli-goo, ga-goo-buh-deeOoh, guh-goo-beeOoh-guh-guh-bee-guh-guh-beeFli-goo gee-gooA-fliguh woo-wa mama Lucifer!I’m about ready to move on, how about you?Not from the shooting, that’s bad and we definitely shouldn’t have that. But the rehabilitation of Donald J Trump? The deification of Saint Donald? As the Great Unifier?Gimme a bucket.https://yellowscene.com/2024/04/07/trump-as-jesus/Just to re-iterate, ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • June 2024: Earth’s 13th-consecutive warmest month on record

    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Jeff Masters and Bob Henson June 2024 was Earth’s warmest June since global record-keeping began in 1850 and was the planet’s 13th consecutive warmest month on record, NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information, or NCEI, reported July 12. As opposed to being focused in ...
    6 days ago
  • Connecting the dots and filling the gaps in our bike network

    This is a guest post by Shaun Baker on the importance of filling the gaps in our cycling networks. It originally appeared on his blog Multimodal Adventures, and is re-posted here with kind permission. In our towns and cities in Aotearoa New Zealand, there are areas in our cycling networks ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    6 days ago
  • Webworm Down Under Photos!

    Hi,I wanted to share a few thoughts and photos from the Webworm popup and Tickled screening we held in Auckland, New Zealand last weekend.In short — it was a blast. I mean, I had a blast and I hope any of you that came also had a blast.An old friend ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    6 days ago
  • The Kākā’s Pick 'n' Mix for Thursday, July 18

    TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 6:30 am on Thursday, July 18 are:News: Christchurch's sewer systems block further housing developments RNZ’s Niva ChittockAnalysis: Interislander: Treasury, MoT officials' mistrust of KiwiRail led ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • The Kākā’s Journal of Record for Thursday, July 18

    TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Thursday, July 18, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:Verbatim: Climate Change Minister Simon Watts held a news conference in Auckland to release the Government’s Emissions Reduction Plan, including ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • The politics of managed retreat

    Climate change deniers are now challenging the Government over a key climate change adaptation policy. That begs the question of whether New Zealand First will then support Government moves to implement processes to deal with a managed retreat for properties in danger of flooding because of sea level rise and ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    6 days ago
  • Some changes are coming

    Warm welcome again to those who are here. The Mountain Tui substack was officially started on the 2nd of July. I wrote about what led me here on this post. Since then, it’s been a learning to navigate the platform, get to meet those in the community, and basically be ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    6 days ago
  • About fucking time

    The US Supreme Court has been rogue for years, with openly corrupt judges making the law up as they go to suit themselves, their billionaire buyers, and the Republican Party. But now, in the wake of them granting a licence for tyranny, President Biden is actually going to try and ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Climate Change: False accounting and wishful thinking

    National released their draft 2026-2030 Emissions Reduction Plan today. The plan is required under the Zero Carbon Act, and must set out policies and strategies to meet the relevant emissions budget. Having cancelled all Labour's actually effective climate change policies and crashed the carbon price, National was always going to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • The Enemies Of Sunshine And Space.

    Our Houses? The Urban Density debate is a horrible combination of intergenerational avarice and envy, fuelled by the grim certainty that none of the generations coming up after them will ever have it as good as the Boomers. To say that this situation rankles among those born after 1965 is to ...
    6 days ago
  • Still the 5 Eyes Achilles Heel?

    The National Cyber Security Centre (NZSC), a unit in the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) dedicated to cyber-security, has released a Review of its response to the 2021 email hacking of NZ members of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC, … Continue reading ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    6 days ago
  • Britain's Devastating Electoral Slip.

    Slip-Sliding Away: Labour may now enjoy a dominant position in Britain’s political landscape, but only by virtue of not being swallowed by it.THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY’S “landslide victory” is nothing of the sort. As most people understand the term, a landslide election victory is one in which the incumbent government, or ...
    6 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on why right wingers think all governments (including their own) are incompetent

    Since open denial of climate change is no longer a viable political option, denial now comes in disguise. The release this week of the coalition government’s ‘draft emissions reductions plan” shows that the Luxon government is refusing to see the need to cut emissions at source. Instead, it proposes to ...
    WerewolfBy lyndon
    6 days ago
  • The Kākā's Chorus for Wednesday, July 17

    TL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy this morning are:Chris Penk is set to roll back building standards for insulation that had only just been put in place, and which had been estimated to save 40% from power costs, after builders ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • Open Letter to Pharmac

    All this talk of getting oldIt's getting me down, my loveLike a cat in a bag, waiting to drownThis time I'm coming downAnd I hope you're thinking of meAs you lay down on your sideNow the drugs don't workThey just make you worse but I know I'll see your face ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    6 days ago
  • A blanket of misinformation

    Two old sayings have been on my mind lately. The first is: “The pen is mightier than the sword”, describing the power of language and communication to help or to harm. The other, which captures the speed with which falsehoods can become ingrained and hard to undo, is: “A lie can ...
    Greater AucklandBy Connor Sharp
    7 days ago
  • The Kākā’s Pick 'n' Mix for Wednesday, July 17

    TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day to 7:00 am on Wednesday, July 17 are:Scoop: Government considers rolling back home insulation standards RNZ’s Eloise GibsonNews: Government plans tree-planting frenzy as report shows NZ no longer ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    7 days ago
  • The Kākā’s Journal of Record for Wednesday, July 17

    TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Wednesday, July 17 , the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day were:Simon Watts released the Government’s draft Emissions Reduction Plan (ERP), which included proposed changes to the Emissions Trading Scheme ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    7 days ago
  • “Shhhh” – National's 3 Waters is loaded with higher costs and lays a path to ...

    This is a long, possibly technical, but very, very important read. I encourage you to take the time and spread your awareness.IntroductionIn 2022, then Labour Party Prime Minister Jacinda Adern expended significant political capital to protect New Zealand’s water assets from privatisation. She lost that battle, and Labour and the ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    7 days ago
  • Plugging a video channel: Dr Gilbz

    Dr. Ella Gilbert is a climate scientist and presenter with a PhD in Antarctic climate change, working at the British Antarctic Survey (BAS). Her background is in atmospheric sciences and she's especially interested in the physical mechanisms of climate change, clouds, and almost anything polar. She is passionate about communicating climate ...
    1 week ago
  • Some “scrutiny” again

    Back in 2022, in its Open Government Partnership National Action Plan, the government promised to strengthen scrutiny of Official Information Act exemption clauses in legislation. Since then they've run a secret "consultation" on how to do that, with their preferred outcome being that agencies will consult the Ministry of Justice ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Crashing New Zealand's health system is not the way to prosperity, Prime Minister

    Another day, and yet another piece of bad news for New Zealand’s health system. Reports have come out that General Practitioners (GP) may have to close doors, or increase patient fees to survive. The so-called ‘capitation’ funding review, which supports GP practices to survive, is under way, and primary care ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    1 week ago
  • Closer Than You Think: Ageing Boomers, Laurie & Les, Talk Politics.

    Redefining Our Terms: “When an angry majority is demanding change, defending the status-quo is an extremist position.”“WHAT’S THIS?”, asked Laurie, eyeing suspiciously the two glasses of red wine deposited in front of him.“A nice drop of red. I thought you’d be keen to celebrate the French Far-Right’s victory with the ...
    1 week ago
  • Come on Darleen.

    Good morning all, time for a return to things domestic. After elections in the UK and France, Luxon gatecrashing Nato, and the attempted shooting of Trump, it’s probably about time we re-focus on local politics.Unless of course you’re Christopher Luxon and you’re so exhausted from all your schmoozing in Washington ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • How the Northwest was lost and may be won

    This is a guest post by Darren Davis. It originally appeared on his excellent blog, Adventures in Transitland, which we encourage you to check out. It is shared by kind permission. The Northwest has always been Auckland’s public transport Cinderella, rarely invited to the public funding ball. How did ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    1 week ago
  • The Kākā's Chorus for Tuesday July 16

    Luxon has told a Financial Times’ correspondent he would openly call out China’s spying in future and does not fear economic retaliation from Aotearoa’s largest trading partner.File Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy on Tuesday, ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • The Kākā’s Pick 'n' Mix for Tuesday, July 16

    TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 6:00 am on Tuesday, July 16 are:PM Christopher Luxon has given a very hawkish interview to the Financial Times-$$$ correspondent in Washington, Demetri Sevastopulu, saying ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • The Kākā’s Journal of Record for Tuesday, July 16

    Photo by Ryunosuke Kikuno on UnsplashTL;DR: The top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day to 6:00 am are:BNZ released its Performance of Services Index for June, finding that services sector is at its lowest level of activity ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • The second crisis; assumption was the mother

    Late on the night of July 16, 1984, while four National Cabinet Ministers were meeting in the Beehive office of Deputy Prime Minister Jim McLay, plotting the ultimate downfall of outgoing Prime Minister Sir Robert Muldoon, another crisis was building up in another part of the capital. The United States ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 week ago
  • Can we air condition our way out of extreme heat?

    This is a re-post from The Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler Air conditioning was initially a symbol of comfort and wealth, enjoyed by the wealthy in theaters and upscale homes. Over time, as technology advanced and costs decreased, air conditioning became more accessible to the general public. With global warming, though, ...
    1 week ago
  • Review: The Zimiamvian Trilogy, by E.R. Eddison (1935-1958)

    I have reviewed some fairly obscure stuff on this blog. Nineteenth century New Zealand speculative fiction. Forgotten Tolkien adaptations. George MacDonald and William Morris. Last month I took a look at The Worm Ouroboros (1922), by E.R. Eddison, which while not strictly obscure, is also not overly inviting to many ...
    1 week ago

  • Charity lotteries to be permitted to operate online

    Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says lotteries for charitable purposes, such as those run by the Heart Foundation, Coastguard NZ, and local hospices, will soon be allowed to operate online permanently. “Under current laws, these fundraising lotteries are only allowed to operate online until October 2024, after which ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • Accelerating Northland Expressway

    The Coalition Government is accelerating work on the new four-lane expressway between Auckland and Whangārei as part of its Roads of National Significance programme, with an accelerated delivery model to deliver this project faster and more efficiently, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “For too long, the lack of resilient transport connections ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • Sir Don to travel to Viet Nam as special envoy

    Sir Don McKinnon will travel to Viet Nam this week as a Special Envoy of the Government, Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced.    “It is important that the Government give due recognition to the significant contributions that General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong made to New Zealand-Viet Nam relations,” Mr ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    9 hours ago
  • Grant Illingworth KC appointed as transitional Commissioner to Royal Commission

    Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says newly appointed Commissioner, Grant Illingworth KC, will help deliver the report for the first phase of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into COVID-19 Lessons, due on 28 November 2024.  “I am pleased to announce that Mr Illingworth will commence his appointment as ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    9 hours ago
  • NZ to advance relationships with ASEAN partners

    Foreign Minister Winston Peters travels to Laos this week to participate in a series of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)-led Ministerial meetings in Vientiane.    “ASEAN plays an important role in supporting a peaceful, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific,” Mr Peters says.   “This will be our third visit to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • Backing mental health services on the West Coast

    Construction of a new mental health facility at Te Nikau Grey Hospital in Greymouth is today one step closer, Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey says. “This $27 million facility shows this Government is delivering on its promise to boost mental health care and improve front line services,” Mr Doocey says. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • NZ support for sustainable Pacific fisheries

    New Zealand is committing nearly $50 million to a package supporting sustainable Pacific fisheries development over the next four years, Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones announced today. “This support consisting of a range of initiatives demonstrates New Zealand’s commitment to assisting our Pacific partners ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • Students’ needs at centre of new charter school adjustments

    Associate Education Minister David Seymour says proposed changes to the Education and Training Amendment Bill will ensure charter schools have more flexibility to negotiate employment agreements and are equipped with the right teaching resources. “Cabinet has agreed to progress an amendment which means unions will not be able to initiate ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago
  • Commissioner replaces Health NZ Board

    In response to serious concerns around oversight, overspend and a significant deterioration in financial outlook, the Board of Health New Zealand will be replaced with a Commissioner, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti announced today.  “The previous government’s botched health reforms have created significant financial challenges at Health NZ that, without ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Minister to speak at Australian Space Forum

    Minister for Space and Science, Innovation and Technology Judith Collins will travel to Adelaide tomorrow for space and science engagements, including speaking at the Australian Space Forum.  While there she will also have meetings and visits with a focus on space, biotechnology and innovation.  “New Zealand has a thriving space ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Climate Change Minister to attend climate action meeting in China

    Climate Change Minister Simon Watts will travel to China on Saturday to attend the Ministerial on Climate Action meeting held in Wuhan.  “Attending the Ministerial on Climate Action is an opportunity to advocate for New Zealand climate priorities and engage with our key partners on climate action,” Mr Watts says. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Oceans and Fisheries Minister to Solomons

    Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is travelling to the Solomon Islands tomorrow for meetings with his counterparts from around the Pacific supporting collective management of the region’s fisheries. The 23rd Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Committee and the 5th Regional Fisheries Ministers’ Meeting in Honiara from 23 to 26 July ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government launches Military Style Academy Pilot

    The Government today launched the Military Style Academy Pilot at Te Au rere a te Tonga Youth Justice residence in Palmerston North, an important part of the Government’s plan to crackdown on youth crime and getting youth offenders back on track, Minister for Children, Karen Chhour said today. “On the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Nine priority bridge replacements to get underway

    The Government has welcomed news the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) has begun work to replace nine priority bridges across the country to ensure our state highway network remains resilient, reliable, and efficient for road users, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.“Increasing productivity and economic growth is a key priority for the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Update on global IT outage

    Acting Prime Minister David Seymour has been in contact throughout the evening with senior officials who have coordinated a whole of government response to the global IT outage and can provide an update. The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet has designated the National Emergency Management Agency as the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Zealand, Japan renew Pacific partnership

    New Zealand and Japan will continue to step up their shared engagement with the Pacific, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.    “New Zealand and Japan have a strong, shared interest in a free, open and stable Pacific Islands region,” Mr Peters says.    “We are pleased to be finding more ways ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New infrastructure energises BOP forestry towns

    New developments in the heart of North Island forestry country will reinvigorate their communities and boost economic development, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones visited Kaingaroa and Kawerau in Bay of Plenty today to open a landmark community centre in the former and a new connecting road in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • 'Pacific Futures'

    President Adeang, fellow Ministers, honourable Diet Member Horii, Ambassadors, distinguished guests.    Minasama, konnichiwa, and good afternoon, everyone.    Distinguished guests, it’s a pleasure to be here with you today to talk about New Zealand’s foreign policy reset, the reasons for it, the values that underpin it, and how it ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Delivering 24 hour pothole repairs

    Kiwis and freight operators will benefit from the Coalition Government delivering on its commitment to introduce targets that will ensure a greater number of potholes on our state highways are identified and fixed within 24 hours, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.  “Increasing productivity to help rebuild our economy is a key ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Peer Support Specialists rolled out in hospitals

    Five hospitals have been selected to trial a new mental health and addiction peer support service in their emergency departments as part of the Government’s commitment to increase access to mental health and addiction support for New Zealanders, says Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey.  “Peer Support Specialists in EDs will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Consultation opens for the Emissions Reduction Plan

    The Government’s draft Emissions Reduction Plan shows we can stay within the limits of the first two emissions budgets while growing the economy, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “This draft Emissions Reduction Plan shows that with effective climate change policies we can both grow the economy and deliver our ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Benefit stats highlight need for welfare reset

    The coalition Government is providing extra support for job seekers to ensure as many Kiwis as possible are in work or preparing for work, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “While today’s quarterly data showing a rise in the number of people on Jobseeker benefits has been long ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • School attendance continues to increase

    Provisional school attendance data for Term 2 2024 released today has shown more students are back in class compared to last year, with 53.1 per cent of students regularly attending, compared with 47 per cent in Term 2 2023, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. “The Government has prioritised student ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • $22.7m of West Coast resilience projects underway

    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed news of progress being made by the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) on the first of several crucial resilience projects underway on the South Island’s West Coast.“State highways across the West Coast are critical lifelines for communities throughout the region, including for freight and tourism. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Migrant school leavers to get part-time work rights

    The coalition Government is providing migrant school leavers with greater opportunities, by increasing access to part-time work rights for those awaiting the outcome of a family residence application, Immigration Minister Erica Stanford has announced.  “Many young people who are part of a family residence application process are unable to work. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Funding to support use of NZ Sign Language

    Seven projects have received government funding totalling nearly $250,000 to maintain and promote the use of New Zealand Sign Language (NZSL). Initiatives that received an NZSL Board Community Grants this year include camps that support the use of NZSL through physical and sensory activities, and clubs where Deaf people and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Inflation data shows progress in economic recovery

    Today’s Consumer Price Index data which has inflation at 3.3 per cent for the year to July 2024, shows we are turning our economy around and winning the fight against rampant inflation, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says.  “While today’s data will be welcome news for Kiwis, I know many New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Experts to advise Minister on Oranga Tamariki

    The Oranga Tamariki Ministerial Advisory Board has been re-established by the Minister for Children, Karen Chhour. “I look forward to working with the new board to continue to ensure Oranga Tamariki and the care and protection system, are entirely child centric,” Minister Chhour says. “The board will provide independent advice ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Expectations set for improved medicines access

    Associate Health Minister David Seymour says he has set clear expectations for Pharmac around delivering the medicines and medical technology that Kiwis need.  “For many New Zealanders, funding for pharmaceuticals is life or death, or the difference between a life of pain and suffering or living freely. New cancer medicines ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Regional Development Minister to host summits

    Regional Development Minister Shane Jones will hold a series of nationwide summits to discuss regional priorities, aspirations and opportunities, with the first kicking off in Nelson on August 12. The 15 summits will facilitate conversations about progressing regional economic growth and opportunities to drive productivity, prosperity and resilience through the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government delivers new school for Rolleston

    The Coalition Government is addressing growing demands on Canterbury’s school network, by delivering a new primary school in Rolleston, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. Within Budget 24’s $400 million investment into school property growth, construction will begin on a new primary school (years 1-8) in Selwyn, Canterbury.  Rolleston South Primary ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New speed camera signs to improve safety

    The Government is welcoming the rollout of new speed camera signs for fixed speed cameras to encourage drivers to check their speeds, improving road safety and avoiding costly speeding tickets, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Providing Kiwis with an opportunity to check their speed and slow down in high crash areas ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • NZ, Korea strengthen relationship

    New Zealand and the Republic of Korea continue to strengthen their relationship, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.   “New Zealand and Korea have a long history – from New Zealand soldiers fighting in the Korean War, through to our strong cooperation today as partners supporting the international rules-based order.    ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Investing for future growth in tourism and hospitality

    The Government is moving forward with recommendations from the Tourism Data Leadership Group, beginning with establishing a Tourism Data Partnership Fund says Tourism and Hospitality Minister Matt Doocey. “The Tourism Data Partnership Fund is funded through the International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy (IVL) and will provide up to $400,000 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • 4000 more job seekers to get case managers

    A new over-the-phone employment case management service will see thousands more job seekers under the age of 25 supported to find work, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston has announced. “MSD case managers provide valuable support to help people into work, but less than a third of those receiving ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Trade Minister to attend G7 meeting in Italy

    Trade Minister Todd McClay will attend the Group of Seven (G7) Trade Ministers meeting in Reggio Calabria, Italy next week. This is the first time New Zealand has been invited to join the event, which will be attended by some of the world’s largest economies and many of New Zealand’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Ministers reveal consequences for unruly Kāinga Ora tenants

    Ministers are pleased to see Kāinga Ora taking a stronger approach to managing unruly, threatening or abusive tenants, Housing Minister Chris Bishop and Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka say.    “For far too long, a small number of Kāinga Ora tenants have ridden roughshod over their neighbours because, under Kāinga ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Prime Minister wraps up US visit in California

    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has finished a successful four-day visit to the United States with meetings in California on his final day focusing on innovation and investment.  “It has been fantastic to be in San Francisco today seeing first-hand the deepening links between New Zealand and California. “New Zealand company, EV Maritime, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Prime Minister leads Indo-Pacific Four at NATO

    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon today chaired a meeting of the Indo-Pacific Four (IP4) countries – Australia, Japan, the Republic of Korea and New Zealand. The IP4 met in the context of NATO’s Summit in Washington DC hosted by President Biden. “Prosperity is only possible with security,” Mr Luxon says. “We need ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • District Court judges appointed

    Attorney-General Hon Judith Collins today announced the appointment of three new District Court Judges.   The appointees, who will take up their roles in July and August at the Manukau, Rotorua and Invercargill courts, are:   Matthew Nathan Judge Nathan was admitted to bar in New Zealand in 2021, having previously been ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-07-23T09:16:45+00:00