Well, kiwis voted for change apparently – no surprise that the authors of New Zealand Sucks would have to cancel Buy New Zealand before introducing Sell New Zealand…..
“Ms Bradford questioned Mr Brownlee’s decision, and said that since it began the campaign had resulted in more people supporting local products.”
Really – if Sue can provide any evidence of this it would be interesting. I doubt there is any such evidence and the money would indeed be better spent elsewhere.
This is really really sad. I felt this campaign was just starting to gain some traction, many people I know were starting to look out for NZ made goods, taking pride in supporting the locals.
The sad part is the locally made brands that have since shut up shop and gone overseas: macpac, swandry, fisher & pykael etc. and now this government is axing buying kiwi made. What a kick in the guts for our local manufacturers.
This government really is opposed to everything kiwi.
I would expect that the choice of phrase used by SP was a deliberate misrepresentation given that the decision is to review not cancel:
Minister of Economic Development Gerry Brownlee said yesterday that no more money would be committed to the campaign, unless a review showed it to be effective.
The alternative is to simply support government spending without any consideration of the benefits.
Local manufacturers want more than a tv advertising campaign. Given where there are heading, some liberalisation of employment law would be one thing that could help but we all know what the response to that would be here.
How come you refer to it as the National/Act Government when the Maori Party and UF is in it too?
[lprent: Because I know that there is a strong congruence between the right wing of the Nats in cabinet and Act. That is likely to provide the political access of this government. The Maori Party IMO doesn’t have any real allies in the Nats cabinet except for a few National Maori MP’s, only one of whom has any real standing.
IF the MP manages to make a real impact (ie not just edge stuff like UF does), then I might change my opinion.]
“On top of that, independent research carried out on the effectiveness of the Buy Kiwi Made campaign proves that consumer, retailer and manufacturer awareness and support are steadily increasing.
“The most recent evaluation, in November 2008, shows that 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before the marketing programme began.
Would be interesting to see the actual research and how this was assessed – I would expect this to be part of the review as to how effective or not it has been.
I felt this campaign was just starting to gain some traction, many people I know were starting to look out for NZ made goods, taking pride in supporting the locals.
That’s the complete reverse of my perception. A quick survey of my colleagues – just as scientific as “many people I know” 🙂 – came to the opposite conclusion.
Those of us that already actively seek out NZ made goods where possible aren’t changing our spending patterns based on the ad, and those of us that have other priorities (price etc) we never going to change in the first place.
I don’t recall you ever asking why the righties here used to refer to the previous govt as the “Clark-Peters” govt. although it too included two other parties.
The ‘Buy NZ made campaign’ could’ve been SSSOOOOOOO much better.
The expensive ads with Oliver as a robot do nothing.
All they need is a damn good website cataloging all the NZ made stuff & an option to buy online. Then a few cheaps TV-ads directing people to the site.
“Stupidest idea to get rid of Buy NZ made campaign what the hell were they thinking?”
1) That its not the job of the government to promote one product over another. Its the job of the producers to promote their product.
2) If you really do believe in New Zealand bussinesses then stop spending money on silly ad campaigns and give them more liberalized employment laws (90 day bill etc). That way they can determine their own future.
“All they need is a damn good website cataloging all the NZ made stuff & an option to buy online. Then a few cheaps adds directing people to the site.”
lukas its pretty obvious that the 2 main players in the current govt are Nat and Act who don’t actually need the other two parties and that the Maori Party were only added as a backstop to disempower Act should the tail start to wag the dog.
Also it gives Nat the opportunity to grab more Maori left leaning voters before the next election. Still at the end of the day its exactly what the were accusing the left of being……… “A multi headed monster” (my term, as the number of heads dosn’t matter – just the fact that they’re there)
I haven’t seen the ads so I can’t comment on the value of this specific campaign, but it’s surely worthwhile to keep promoting the general principle of buying NZ made goods.
Phil’s comment above reminds me of some of the misguided comments I read after the repeal of section 59 which were along the lines of “Oh look, a kid was killed today so clearly changing that law was a waste of time”.
We’re talking about attempts to shift attitudes over the long term, changes which are measured not in months and years, but decades and generations.
The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!
I’m with NX on the website idea, though I know I personally have started spending a lot more money in shops displaying the “Buy Kiwi and we’ve got it made” stickers/signs.
Love the classic sneak tactics – “we can’t commit more cash to this unless a review shows it to be effective” … with no actual statement that a review will, in fact, be carried out.
(Sure, one could read an implication that a review will be done, but then either Brownlee’s PR advisor or the NZPA should have said “forthcoming review” to ensure clarity of meaning. No, I’m not obsessed with semantics, why do you ask?)
I like NX’s idea. Perhaps we should push for NX to be put in charge of this campaign?
Sure :). And I accept the generous salary which probably goes with the job.
Telling people to simply ‘buy NZ made’ isn’t good enough.
Information is the key. TradeMe & eBay are great for finding exactly what you want.
There are some great NZ made safety gear – likes footwear etc. Half the problem is finding where to get the stuff. So a website to tie it all together would be great.
I would also widen the website’s scope to include products made with environmental considerations – irrespective of where they’re made.
‘Conscious consumerism’ is the future in my opinion. Where people can choose to spend their money on things that are important to them.
Information is the key. All going well we wouldn’t even need the ETS/carbon trading rubbish.
“Well, kiwis voted for change apparently – no surprise that the authors of New Zealand Sucks would have to cancel Buy New Zealand before introducing Sell New Zealand ..”
I can’t better what you just said, so I’ve repeated your post.
Greg, being “efficient” is not the sole determinant of the worth of an enterprise. Many “inefficient” things (ie. the public service, Air NZ, manufacturing) are better retained locally — to do otherwise puts them at risk of insecurity/profiteering/asset stripping. Also, surely fair trade is better than “free” trade?
As it is, NZers are effectively “subsidising” profits to overseas corporations — to the tune of $5 billion (or more) per year:
Transnational corporations (TNCs) make massive profits out of New Zealand. These can truly be called New Zealand’s biggest invisible export. In the decade 1997-2006, TNCs made $50.3 billion profits. Only 32% was reinvested, and in some years more was sent overseas than was earned or the reinvestment was significantly offset by capital being taken out of the country.
Felix said on
December 8, 2008 at 11:58 am “We’re talking about attempts to shift attitudes over the long term, changes which are measured not in months and years, but decades and generations.”
That is what NZers never understood about the real legacy of the Labour plus Government.
That NZers had the energy and the independence and the confidence to complain about Labour is due in large part to Labour giving them their mana back.
The only problem with helping people is when they’re back on their feet, the last thing they want to be is forever beholden to the people who helped them. But Labour was concerned with investing in a country that could once again make its own product not be buying 3rd rate product in and losing export monies.
Daveski – I bet you hate that the Labour Government wouldn’t let employers pay Mexican wages to New Zealanders. No doubt you’ll be pleased to have the ‘NZ sucks’ National Party in. By the time N/act’s finished engineering the employment laws NZers will be leaving here to get better wages in Mexico.
Well Buy NZ hasn’t helped my biz one little bit and I have used NZ design, supply, manufacture, marketing, products, services, bloody NZ everything. Amounts to diddly squat when the cheque comes to be written. Maybe I am just too inefficient. Mind you my industry has no competition from overseas companies.
Any marketing campaign needs to have measurable results. While it sounds good for Bradford to claim 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before, where is the proof that this is translating into dollars spent on Kiwi-made. And are the surveyed shoppers actually the target market for this campaign? Do you even know who the target market is? Low income earners? Beneficiaries? Or just ‘the rich’.
What NZ made goods are lower income earners meant to buy? Can they afford the generally higher cost of buying NZ made goods when the imported alternatives are so much cheaper and means they can still buy Christmas presents for their kids?
Do NZ made goods need to compete on price? If so are we prepared to have lower wages in order to make this possible?
If we aren’t expecting the low income earners to be part of the target market of this campaign then who is it, and what are the likely products they will buy that are NZ made?
Let’s see the business case for this campaign, and some real measurable outcomes. It seems to me that the millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on this campaign are misguided and wasteful.
Jum – you miss my point going for the dramatic riposte.
If you asked employers, I’ll bet you that the majority would suggest a raft of activities that would benefit business beyond a simple advertising campaign. No where did I infer a desire to lower wages.
My point is that an advertising campaign won’t be enough to stop manufacturers moving off shore.
-Cactus Climbing: good quality backpacks made in Christchurch
-Sistema: plastic containers
-Click-Clack: plastic containers, still local I think?
-Survival: merino thermal clothing
-CCC: Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury, used to make the old All Blacks jerseys until the rugby union sold them out to Adidas. Now makes socks and some clothing.Most stuff made at Christchurch factory, some is Chinese though.
-Rembrant: suit makers
-Chalky Digits: clothes
-Firestone: tires
How does being NZ Made make something intrinsicly better?
Should we be buying NZ made TVs?
Cars?
Should we have import controls?
Why do we need govt to tell us to buy NZ made? Why can’t we do it ourselves? Why can’t manufacturers band together, and promote it themselves. This (Buy NZ Made regardless of price or quality) is simply corportate welfare and nationalism. Not sound economic policy.
I’ll buy NZ made if I like the product (I love supporting *good* local music, food, clothing etc) and it is well priced, not because its made in NZ, but because I want it.
The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!
”
And its bad for the environment as its an ineffecient use of scarce resources.
No wonder the Greens are all for it, being environmentalists and all!
PS: how on earth do I type a pound sign? Its in the captcha!
Any of you lefties got any evidence that this campaign has resulted in the purchase of single NZ made product that would not otherwise have been bought? Warning: if anyone replies using the word “awareness” I will personally hunt you down and knee you in your soft bits.
Billy – I went from buying NZ made goods about half or the time to buying them almost exclusively. Part of the reason I was able to do this was it raised awareness amongst retailer that NZ Made was a selling point and they actually started clearly labeling goods as such…
Oh and Billy – I don’t have soft bits. I’m 100% hard-ass.
Ha! Cap is “IV Pierson”! does Steve have a habit he’d rather not talk about…
It was canceled because like a lot of the Green’s programmes it didn’t produce enough good results.
Also the concepts of the ads were wrong, it should of been buy NewZealand made because we produce the best at the best price, not just buy NewZealand made for the sake of it.
Women do most of the shopping and women are discerning shoppers. Most women I know look for NZ made things because they are good quality and different eg kumfs and minnie cooper shoes (I’ve stopped buying Minx now they’re made in China). We are very conscious that Buy NZ made also means NZ jobs as well. Women are also label readers in supermarkets.
What really urks me is when you come across a NZ brand that has traded on being quality and locally made but has recently moved to Asia e.g. Macpac, Fairydown.
They try and tell you its exactly the same quality as you’re used to. Somehow I doubt a wage slave in China is going to make an equal quality product compared to a happy worker on a decent wage in NZ.
Buy NZ made only works as a campaign, if we are thinking about campaigning about the positive things about New Zealand as a whole.
The National party don’t particularly want to arouse nationalist sentiment that might be annoying when they introduce PPPs or saying yes to whatever Australia and the U.S. say.
The things that define us, or make us nationalistic: that have been our ‘brand’ if you will are not always things this government is comfortable with.
Our environmentalism (well and truly on the wane), being tidy repsonsible kiwis, our nuclear free and independent foreign policy, our multiculturual and inclusive society, the idea of giving someone a fair go, and indeed good faith and fairness in general, the idea of looking after people who can’t look after themselves and caring for others in need…
so many of these things are well in truly at odds with the National Party or they simply don’t care about them. How can they try and talk up a brand they don’t care that much about?
I just love how Janet seems to think she represents every female in New Zealand. In fact I’m always astounded when anyone here believe they represent the whole of New Zealand. I’m sorry you don’t.
The Buy NZ campaign was pretty dire I think. I didn’t really get it. Here was some ultra-technological factory building a robot that happened to be Oliver Driver who I find awful. New Zealand doesn’t exactly build many technological things that a consumer can easily buy at the shop. The campaign was a huge misstep and personally never made me more New Zealand products.
Thus I really am not concerned that the campaign was suspended.
Perhaps the National Party think that this is the kind of thing that the business community will provide out of its evident self interest? you know like banks and lending to people who are able to pay back and that kind of thing?
It’s up to businesses to be self sustaining Paul, it would be a poor excuse for a business that relied on government funding to survive. Why should taxpayer money be spent on marketing costs for NZ businesses?
I am amused that a left wing blog is trying to defend this campaign. It’s very apparent that it’s only because it was Bradford’s project. If National had launched the campaign you would all be up in arms about it being a way for them to be lining the pockets of their business buddies.
“You should buy the best product for the best price.”
Yep, but all other things being equal, of course you should support local businesses. It keeps more money here for us and it uses less transportation which is better environmentally.
So Brett, my question is: If you have to choose between a foreign product and a local one of equal quality, how small does the price difference have to be before you’d pick the NZ product?
It sounds like you’re saying it’s zero, whereas I happily pay a few percent more to support local workers and local businesses. Why? Because I’m selfish. I want local businesses and local workers to be better off because then I’m better off in the long run.
What motivates me to buy kiwi made is that my action of buying that product is resulting in jobs for kiwi’s, keeps profits in NZ and thats good for New Zealand. The last thing I want to see is us become a nation of retailers who just sell imported junk.
I can always buy the alternative, the cheap imported shit from China, after all its the best product at the best price. But then Id be supporting one of the biggest polluters in the world, bank-rolling what is effectively slave labour and undermining local kiwi’s.
Sometimes you’ve got to ask whats behind the price tag.
Re chocolate – there is a distinct flavour difference between NZ and Australian chocolate, even that under the Cadbury brand. I think it is something to do with the lush NZ grass NZ cows eat.
GC Of course I don’t claim to represent NZ women but I have a wide circle and we discuss topics such as this. In fact were talking about this with a group just yesterday and we all agreed that we take care to buy NZ made. We don’t automatically buy Fisher and Paykel any more – in fact some actively boycott it after the NZ factory closures.
Heaven forbid that I would agree on anything with women like Judith Collins.
As a friend of mine pointed out, Labour in 1935 brought in the ethos of the Welfare State to give all New Zealanders help when they needed it. The National Party was transmogrified from the ashes of the ruling elite in 1936 to get rid of the Labour Party’s plan to be there for all NZers.
Now, I always read the rightie posts with that thought in mind.
The Left considers how they can help local business (YES, even the very businesses which would shaft them with the 90day probation period).
The Right only ever think of themselves.
This election was never about a change of face. It was about the destruction of a unifying philosophy, in order to allow for a foreign takeover bid, using divide and conquer tactics.
Consumers always will buy the best product at the best price. Putting Oliver Driver on TV telling us to pay more for a sub-standard product just because it will help the bloke down the road was never going to convince anyone at the till.
I happily pay a few percent more to support local workers and local businesses. Why? Because I’m selfish. I want local businesses and local workers to be better off because then I’m better off in the long run.
What if your “better off” comes at the expense of the chinese labourer that used to make shoes, and now gets nothing?
What do you see as a bigger loss of income: the guy that goes from NZ minium wage to the unemployment benefit OR the guy in China going from a few cents a day to nothing at all?
If only women realised that, as the major buyer or influence on buying decisions, their power is huge. If they ever decide to form a lobby group country-wide they could easily bring a company down, whatever its size.
The said company had better hope the lobby group consists of left-leaning (as I stated at 5.37) women who won’t want to damage the company or its workers!
Putting aside the obvious*, I’ve always wondered about the philosophical basis for these “buy NZ made” campaigns.
Are we saying that we should be more worried about the plight of NZers over the plight of Chinese people? Why should we care that plastic stuff comes out of China, and each time you buy plastic stuff from China the per capita GDP there gets a little bit closer to ours (but still miles behind)?
Do we care about human welfare, but only if it’s humans within our borders…?
* How can anyone complain about actually checking to see whether “Buy New Zealand made” is value for money? If I hire someone to clean my windows, I need to check that they’ve done a decent job before I decide to hire them again. I’d be a moron if, instead of checking the windows in front of me, I spent hours debating whether window-cleaners are a good idea in principle… National is absolutely within its rights to review the previous government’s expenditure and find out whether the money might be better spent on something else. That’s the job we pay them to do.
Women have organised themselves into a consumer lobby before. CARP – campaign against rising prices – was very effective in the 1960s/1970s. I think Cath Kelly, mother of the CTU’s Helen Kelly, was one of the main activists.
I think (memory hazy here) that the 3rd Labour govt’s maximum retail price (Warren Freer’s MRP campaign) was one of the results. Regulations to limit prices of consumer goods. Now wouldn’t that be a good idea again! That would shock the righties above.
I’m intrigued and suspicious. If National is so concerned about value for money re Buy NZ Made, why didn’t they check earlier and bleat then.
I guess they knew it would have made them sound like they didn’t care about small NZ business and workers pre-electionand now of course they can bleat about this and cover up on the nasty little sidelines they are pursuing, with forcing unemployment up through businesses falling over, if less attention goes on Buy NZ Made and thereby creating their dreamed of weak, desperate labour force.
NZers ‘are’ still so comfortable under the inclusive previous Government they don’t believe ‘nouveauNational’ can hurt their future. I know better.
“Buy kiwi made” was an 8 million dollar accommodation for the greens, a complete waste of money and more proof (if you needed it) of the left’s myth that throwing large amounts of cash at something will fix it. Good riddance
Buy NZ Made is a member based organisation funded by members, the Government campaign is the Buy Kiwi Made Campaign.
Buy NZ Made won 50% funding from one of the Buy Kiwi Made Campaign’s funding rounds to build a website to advertise New Zealand Made goods and to connect manufacturers, retailers and consumers with them.
This website has been up and running since September the 1st and has been advertised on web and in magazines. It has also been mentioned in the latest Buy Kiwi Made radio advertisements.
So for those of you who were wishing for a website which catalogues NZ Made goods .. your wish is granted. The website currently shows over 2000 products which is not bad for such a new site. This site is lilkely to grow considerably over the next few months.
It’s up to businesses to be self sustaining Paul, it would be a poor excuse for a business that relied on government funding to survive. Why should taxpayer money be spent on marketing costs for NZ businesses?
I am amused that a left wing blog is trying to defend this campaign. It’s very apparent that it’s only because it was Bradford’s project. If National had launched the campaign you would all be up in arms about it being a way for them to be lining the pockets of their business buddies.
Heh I had you in the grip of angry reason and then lost it all with the quote tags.
basically, mate, you are an idealogue of the worst sort. I understand the sentiment. I even appreciate that we can’t run on subsidies, and if we are doing that for profitable industries it is completely wrong.
However we don’t live in a free trade society. If you are consistent and not just an idiot troll I expect to see you supporting business taking the full cost of their carbon pollution as soon as possible.
sorry? Was that taxpayer money should not be spent subsidising business unless it is a large amount?
Realisitically in a small country government has a role to play in helping business in this way. If the National party were really nationalists, they would be doing that, instead of searching for ways to reduce costs for their chums in international cartels.
“So you are telling me that NZ made/Kiwi made is sub-standard product?’
Actually, thats what this entire campaign is doing. To me, the government steping in to promote a product suggests that the product is not good enough to be sold on its own merits and that it needs to be protected or it will not be able to compete with others.
Some people in this thread refer to a ‘New Zealand sucks’ campaign. Well clearly if they think that New Zealand products should be protected through this campaign or other measures then they are the ones who think that New Zealand products suck.
Greg, being “efficient’ is not the sole determinant of the worth of an enterprise. Many “inefficient’ things (ie. the public service, Air NZ, manufacturing) are better retained locally — to do otherwise puts them at risk of insecurity/profiteering/asset stripping. Also, surely fair trade is better than “free’ trade?
As it is, NZers are effectively “subsidising’ profits to overseas corporations — to the tune of $5 billion (or more) per year:
Transnational corporations (TNCs) make massive profits out of New Zealand. These can truly be called New Zealand’s biggest invisible export. In the decade 1997-2006, TNCs made $50.3 billion profits. Only 32% was reinvested, and in some years more was sent overseas than was earned or the reinvestment was significantly offset by capital being taken out of the country.”
Ropata – you’ve just stumbled upon the economic concept of comparative advantage. Of course transnational corporations make profits out of New Zealand. But we make a hell of a lot off our exports too. You can’t have one but not the other. Are you suggesting we cut off all trade? Comparative advantage is gained when when each country specialises in what they’re best at and trade (well there’s more to it then that but we’ll leave it there). That way each country makes the most effective use of its own resources. Protectionist measures like the ‘buy NZ made ad campaign inhibit this and its makes NZ and the rest of the world worst off.
On your other points. Air NZ and manufacturing are classic examples of industries that should not be propped up by the government. In Air NZ’s case competitors like pacific blue, quantas etc etc will keep them honest whether they’re owned by NZ or China. Manufacturing is a part of the buy NZ made answer. We should only keep manufacturing goods that we can produce efficiently. Thats why we don’t have a car industry. Its much cheaper for us to import – look to the states to see how a subsidised car industry is further crippling their economy. In the Public service efficiency results in the best result anyway – we want the services provided by the public service to cost as little as possible so we can have lower taxes and more money to spend!
I get pretty passionate about this ‘fair trade’ thing. I too want save the starving in africa. But did you know trade barriers cost the third world a hell of a lot more than the amount of aid we give them. The facts are there – google it (I can’t be bothered, its late). ‘Unfair trade’ is far far far better than no trade at all. The fact is – countries who engage in trade even if its from sweatshops improve over time – look at Japan. Buying their ‘cheap and nasty’ products is the best help we can give them.
Paul – “However we don’t live in a free trade society. If you are consistent and not just an idiot troll I expect to see you supporting business taking the full cost of their carbon pollution as soon as possible.”
Yeah sure. But a couple of points. Business won’t take the brunt of the cost, it will be passed onto the consumer – lets not forget that. Also that means some businesses get carbon credits too right, if their net emissions are negative?
I believe this is how it has to work. The cost of carbon will be a long term cost. It will not go away. We have to be prepared to pay more, and the businesses which can become the most efficient and therefore offer cheaper prices are rewarded.
This market system is something isn’t it?
This is what the Greens have been arguing for a long time.
If our business adapts like other businesses internationally, (and I’m not completely clued in on the ins and outs of a carbon trading market) yes! it would be fantastic if we could get carbon credits for nett emissions. I know some companies particularly airlines offer carbon offset options or the like where they buy or invest in tracts of forestry.
I don’t see what the problem is with this. If we don’t we are passing the bill on to our children and grandchildren, rather than attempting to recognise and deal with the problem. I also realise it is a joke to blame National solely for this. Almost everyone in NZ is complicit in inaction for too long.
Anyway that’s the theory. I did study a small bit of biology and economics, but never got near farm accounts or forrestry work.
I’m not sure if negative net emissions equals credits under the currently proposed and soon to be rehacked scheme. Anyone know?
The fact is – countries who engage in trade even if its from sweatshops improve over time – look at Japan.
I’m sure all those U.S. military Korean war contracts were helpful too, to help keep the munitions and arms factories running and turn them into car manufacturers and the like.
We should buy New Zealand for the same reason everyone else does overseas, it is a niche quality fashionable brand, and we are a unique part of it. As I mentioned above, it is hardly the most of protectionist measures out there, if it really is truly one at all.
The government is just involved in a campaign like the Woolmark or the beef and lamb campaign, but what they are selling is the quality of our country overall, which suprisingly I would say they have a stake in.
Efficiency and market clearing is a laudable goal. But your argument goes beyond economics into sovereignty. Everything can be done more efficiently. But more efficiently for whom? Without Air New Zealand there might be more efficient air travel,, but it is in New Zealand’s public good to have a national carrier who supports our tourism industry.
Manfacturing can be different, but it is sometimes very difficult to compete marketing a smaller product against mass produced brands dumped in large chain stores. Hence a little support with the marketing, and the promotion of quality behind a Made in NZ sticker.
“What if your “better off’ comes at the expense of the chinese labourer that used to make shoes, and now gets nothing?”
Didn’t I explain that I’m selfish? Anyway…
The Chinese labourers you mention have very little protection. They don’t have the workplace rights that our unions have fought hard for and won.
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to imply that you’re supporting Chinese labourers by buying goods made in China – you’re supporting their exploitation. Massive profits are made off their labour by denying them proper work rights and that’s what you’re supporting.
I prefer to support the rights of workers by buying products made by workers who have rights.
My understanding, and correct me if I’m wrong, but Ive heard that for IceBreaker its so cheap to manufacture in China that they can produce the merino wool here, ship it to China to be made into clothes, and have it shipped back again.
Now how are local manufacturers supposed to compete against that without support from the government?
Why, by lowering our workplace standards to be closer to those of China of course. I heard Roger Douglas on the radio just the other week praising the “efficiency” of Chinese industry.
Rod Donald’s legacy is a bunch of ads that make Oliver Driver appear stupider thatn he already is and make fat ad exec’s rich? That’s unspeakably sad. I thought he’d done lots of good stuff.
“basically, mate, you are an idealogue of the worst sort. I understand the sentiment. I even appreciate that we can’t run on subsidies, and if we are doing that for profitable industries it is completely wrong.”
Are you suggesting we should subsidise unprofitable industries? I’m all for helping kiwi businesses get up and running and I reckon $6.3 million would be very helpful if it was applied the right way. I had a small business myself about 5 years ago and would have loved the government to be more helpful rather than making me jump through bureaucratic hurdles. In the end I had to lay off 5 staff and find a job.
On the topic of this post, it is sensible to review any campaign to see whether it is delivering results, rather than just keep chucking money at ad agencies. There are probably some parts of the campaign that will be kept after review, such as the getnzmade.net website (which I don’t recall seeing anything about on the TV ad by the way), but the point is that reviewing the campaign is the right thing to do.
Regarding your insults, I’ll be up here on the high road mate.
Paul – on your first post, I agree. On the second, not so much:
“‘im sure all those U.S. military Korean war contracts were helpful too, to help keep the munitions and arms factories running and turn them into car manufacturers and the like.
We should buy New Zealand for the same reason everyone else does overseas, it is a niche quality fashionable brand, and we are a unique part of it. As I mentioned above, it is hardly the most of protectionist measures out there, if it really is truly one at all.
The government is just involved in a campaign like the Woolmark or the beef and lamb campaign, but what they are selling is the quality of our country overall, which suprisingly I would say they have a stake in.
Efficiency and market clearing is a laudable goal. But your argument goes beyond economics into sovereignty. Everything can be done more efficiently. But more efficiently for whom? Without Air New Zealand there might be more efficient air travel,, but it is in New Zealand’s public good to have a national carrier who supports our tourism industry.
Manfacturing can be different, but it is sometimes very difficult to compete marketing a smaller product against mass produced brands dumped in large chain stores. Hence a little support with the marketing, and the promotion of quality behind a Made in NZ sticker.”
Yeah Japan did benefit from foreign investment. Something that will happen to all third world countries as their economies improve and the risk lessens. If they can get themselves off the ground first. Why should the government sell New Zealand to New Zealanders? There may be an argument for doing this overseas but preaching to the converted is a bit silly isn’t it? And why does an air carrier have to be public owned to support our tourism industry? Surely its in any air carriers commercial interests to promote tourism. Its more benefit for them!
If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses.
Felix – “The Chinese labourers you mention have very little protection. They don’t have the workplace rights that our unions have fought hard for and won.
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to imply that you’re supporting Chinese labourers by buying goods made in China – you’re supporting their exploitation. Massive profits are made off their labour by denying them proper work rights and that’s what you’re supporting.
I prefer to support the rights of workers by buying products made by workers who have rights.”
Again, this kind of statement really gets under my skin. Your supporting Chinease workers by not buying their goods. How the hell is that meant to make them better off? They’ve gone from a crap job to no job. A crap job being a hell of a lot better than no job at all.
No I’m suggesting that subsidies are not necessarily a good thing, especially as we used to have them for our most productive sectors. I notice you had no reply to why the taxpayer should be bailing out industries on Kyoto agreements. If it walks like a fish mate, irrespective of what road it’s walking on.
@Greg
I don’t know if being occupied by the U.S. after the second world war, and getting a kickstart from large military contracts, is quite the same practically and morally as buying coffee or small local industries from developing countries.
If the government doesn’t sell the New Zealand brand who will? The media relentlessly paint us disproportionantly as a country over run by crime. I remember the irony of the 90s when the only companies to use patriotism in their advertising were overseas countries- Toyota ‘welcome to our world’ and Barry Crump, McDonalds and the Kiwiburger…there are 2 or 3 other examples but I can’t think of them just at the moment.
The point with mass production is not, I don’t think, efficiency leading to the best use of scarce resources. It is that a large company can get a strong advantage in marketing its products, and getting exclusive or very favourable distribution deals, which make competing for small manufacturers (and retailers for that matter) very difficult. Not particularly perfect market stuff.
Well if one is made in New Zealand and one is made elsewhere it isn’t identical is it? There are all kinds of reasons why people choose a particular brand. Could be the safety standards of a country, where their sister lives, their human rights record, their favourite sports team, passing fads…
I understand the argument you are making, but especially in times of economic hardship, I think you will be hard pressed to find any practical examples of it in action internationally. As I said we don’t live in a free trade world, and we have to be careful with the baby and bathtub. Which is my way of saying, brain hurt, have to go work. cheers.
“Any marketing campaign needs to have measurable results. While it sounds good for Bradford to claim 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before, where is the proof that this is translating into dollars spent on Kiwi-made. And are the surveyed shoppers actually the target market for this campaign? Do you even know who the target market is? Low income earners? Beneficiaries? Or just ‘the rich’.
What NZ made goods are lower income earners meant to buy? Can they afford the generally higher cost of buying NZ made goods when the imported alternatives are so much cheaper and means they can still buy Christmas presents for their kids?
Do NZ made goods need to compete on price? If so are we prepared to have lower wages in order to make this possible?
If we aren’t expecting the low income earners to be part of the target market of this campaign then who is it, and what are the likely products they will buy that are NZ made?
Let’s see the business case for this campaign, and some real measurable outcomes. It seems to me that the millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on this campaign are misguided and wasteful.”
The only thing you know about marketing it seems is how to spell it!!!!!
“The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!”
More like this comment is a wasted amount of internet space!!!! What a load of crap
“If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses”
That is NOT what the campaign is all about agghhhh, and this just shows how agghhhh you are in the subject of marketing, in fact, business, agghhhh
“If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses.”
Proves my point, you know fuck all about marketing
Just remember that those adverts and posters and what not is a very very small part of marketing. It is not the whole marketing concept, it is a piss ant in comparrison so you cant judge a marketing campagin from some dumb arse picture or advert. There is a hell of a lot to marketing than advertising!!!
Open access notablesIce acceleration and rotation in the Greenland Ice Sheet interior in recent decades, Løkkegaard et al., Communications Earth & Environment:In the past two decades, mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet has accelerated, partly due to the speedup of glaciers. However, uncertainty in speed derived from satellite products ...
Buzz from the Beehive A statement from Children’s Minister Karen Chhour – yet to be posted on the Government’s official website – arrived in Point of Order’s email in-tray last night. It welcomes the High Court ruling on whether the Waitangi Tribunal can demand she appear before it. It does ...
Mr Bombastic:Ironically, the media the academic experts wanted is, in many ways, the media they got. In place of the tyrannical editors of yesteryear, advancing without fear or favour the interests of the ruling class; the New Zealand news media of today boasts a troop of enlightened journalists dedicated to ...
It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...
In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...
Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder.In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére SosouMarket gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...
Buzz from the Beehive Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ...
Morning in London Mother hugs beloved daughter outside the converted shoe factory in which she is living.Afternoon in London Travelling writer takes himself and his wrist down to A&E, just to be sure. Read more ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – The recent announcement of the University Advisory Group, chaired by Sir Peter Gluckman, makes very clear where the Government’s focus and priorities lie. The remit of the Advisory Group is that Group members will consider challenges and opportunities for improvement in the university sector including: ...
Eric Crampton writes – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand desperately wants to find reasons to have workstreams in climate change. It makes little sense. They’ve run another stress test on the banks looking to see if they could find a prudential regulation case. They couldn’t. They ...
Rob MacCullough writes – Pundits from the left and the right are arguing that National’s Fast Track Bill that is designed to speed up infrastructure decisions could end up becoming mired in a cesspool of corruption. Political commentator ...
Looking at the headlines this morning it’s hard to feel anything other than pessimistic about the future of humanity.Note that I’m not speaking about the future of mankind, but the survival of our humanity. The values that we believe in seem to be ebbing away, by the day.Perhaps every generation ...
Swabbing mixed breed baby chicks to test for avian influenzaUh oh. Bird flu – often deadly to humans – is not only being transmitted from infected birds to dairy cows, but is now travelling between dairy cows. As of last Friday, Bloomberg News reports, there were 32 American dairy herds ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
What is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...
Buzz from the Beehive Reactions to news of the government’s readiness to make urgent changes to “the resource management system” through a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) suggest a balanced approach is being taken. The Taxpayers’ Union says the proposed changes don’t go far enough. Greenpeace says ...
I’m starting to wonder if Anna Burns-Francis might be the best political interviewer we’ve got. That might sound unlikely to you, it came as a bit of a surprise to me.Jack Tame can be excellent, but has some pretty average days. I like Rebecca Wright on Newshub, she asks good ...
Chris Trotter writes – Willie Jackson is said to be planning a “media summit” to discuss “the state of the media and how to protect Fourth Estate Journalism”. Not only does the Editor of The Daily Blog, Martyn Bradbury, think this is a good idea, but he has also ...
Graeme Edgeler writes – This morning [April 21], the Wellington High Court is hearing a judicial review brought by Hon. Karen Chhour, the Minister for Children, against a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal. This is unusual, judicial reviews are much more likely to brought against ministers, rather than ...
Both of Parliament’s watchdogs have now ripped into the Government’s Fast-track Approvals Bill. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s political economy and beyond on the morning of Tuesday, April 23 are:The Lead: The Auditor General,John Ryan, has joined the ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah SpengemanPeople wait to board an electric bus in Pune, India. (Image credit: courtesy of ITDP) Public transportation riders in Pune, India, love the city’s new electric buses so much they will actually skip an older diesel bus that ...
The infrastructure industry yesterday issued a “hurry up” message to the Government, telling it to get cracking on developing a pipeline of infrastructure projects.The hiatus around the change of Government has seen some major projects cancelled and others delayed, and there is uncertainty about what will happen with the new ...
Hi,Over the weekend I revisited a podcast I really adore, Dead Eyes. It’s about a guy who got fired from Band of Brothers over two decades ago because Tom Hanks said he had “dead eyes”.If you don’t recall — 2001’s Band of Brothers was part of the emerging trend of ...
Buzz from the Beehive The 180 or so recipients of letters from the Government telling them how to submit infrastructure projects for “fast track” consideration includes some whose project applications previously have been rejected by the courts. News media were quick to feature these in their reports after RMA Reform Minister Chris ...
It would not be a desirable way to start your holiday by breaking your back, your head, or your wrist, but on our first hour in Singapore I gave it a try.We were chatting, last week, before we started a meeting of Hazel’s Enviro Trust, about the things that can ...
Calling all journalists, academics, planners, lawyers, political activists, environmentalists, and other members of the public who believe that the relationships between vested interests and politicians need to be scrutinised. We need to work together to make sure that the new Fast-Track Approvals Bill – currently being pushed through by the ...
Feel worried. Shane Jones and a couple of his Cabinet colleagues are about to be granted the power to override any and all objections to projects like dams, mines, roads etc even if: said projects will harm biodiversity, increase global warming and cause other environmental harms, and even if ...
Bryce Edwards writes- The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. ...
Michael Bassett writes – If you think there is a move afoot by the radical Maori fringe of New Zealand society to create a parallel system of government to the one that we elect at our triennial elections, you aren’t wrong. Over the last few days we have ...
Without a corresponding drop in interest rates, it’s doubtful any changes to the CCCFA will unleash a massive rush of home buyers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate on Monday, April 22 included:The Government making a ...
Sunday was a lazy day. I started watching Jack Tame on Q&A, the interviews are usually good for something to write about. Saying the things that the politicians won’t, but are quite possibly thinking. Things that are true and need to be extracted from between the lines.As you might know ...
In our Weekly Roundup last week we covered news from Auckland Transport that the WX1 Western Express is going to get an upgrade next year with double decker electric buses. As part of the announcement, AT also said “Since we introduced the WX1 Western Express last November we have seen ...
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 29 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Stats NZ releases its statutory report on Census 2023 tomorrow.Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivers a pre-Budget speech at ...
A listing of 29 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 14, 2024 thru Sat, April 20, 2024. Story of the week Our story of the week hinges on these words from the abstract of a fresh academic ...
The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. The Government says this will ...
This is a column to say thank you. So many of have been in touch since Mum died to say so many kind and thoughtful things. You’re wonderful, all of you. You’ve asked how we’re doing, how Dad’s doing. A little more realisation each day, of the irretrievable finality of ...
Identifying the engine type in your car is crucial for various reasons, including maintenance, repairs, and performance upgrades. Knowing the specific engine model allows you to access detailed technical information, locate compatible parts, and make informed decisions about modifications. This comprehensive guide will provide you with a step-by-step approach to ...
Introduction: The allure of racing is undeniable. The thrill of speed, the roar of engines, and the exhilaration of competition all contribute to the allure of this adrenaline-driven sport. For those who yearn to experience the pinnacle of racing, becoming a race car driver is the ultimate dream. However, the ...
Introduction Automobiles have become ubiquitous in modern society, serving as a primary mode of transportation and a symbol of economic growth and personal mobility. With countless vehicles traversing roads and highways worldwide, it begs the question: how many cars are there in the world? Determining the precise number is a ...
Maintaining a safe and reliable vehicle requires regular inspections. Whether it’s a routine maintenance checkup or a safety inspection, knowing how long the process will take can help you plan your day accordingly. This article delves into the factors that influence the duration of a car inspection and provides an ...
Mazda Motor Corporation, commonly known as Mazda, is a Japanese multinational automaker headquartered in Fuchu, Aki District, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The company was founded in 1920 as the Toyo Cork Kogyo Co., Ltd., and began producing vehicles in 1931. Mazda is primarily known for its production of passenger cars, but ...
Your car battery is an essential component that provides power to start your engine, operate your electrical systems, and store energy. Over time, batteries can weaken and lose their ability to hold a charge, which can lead to starting problems, power failures, and other issues. Replacing your battery before it ...
In most states, you cannot register a car without a valid driver’s license. However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. Exceptions to the RuleIf you are under 18 years old: In some states, you can register a car in your name even if you do not ...
Mazda, a Japanese automotive manufacturer with a rich history of innovation and engineering excellence, has emerged as a formidable player in the global car market. Known for its reputation of producing high-quality, fuel-efficient, and driver-oriented vehicles, Mazda has consistently garnered praise from industry experts and consumers alike. In this article, ...
Struts are an essential part of a car’s suspension system. They are responsible for supporting the weight of the car and damping the oscillations of the springs. Struts are typically made of steel or aluminum and are filled with hydraulic fluid. How Do Struts Work? Struts work by transferring the ...
Car registration is a mandatory process that all vehicle owners must complete annually. This process involves registering your car with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and paying an associated fee. The registration process ensures that your vehicle is properly licensed and insured, and helps law enforcement and other authorities ...
Zoom is a video conferencing service that allows you to share your screen, webcam, and audio with other participants. In addition to sharing your own audio, you can also share the audio from your computer with other participants. This can be useful for playing music, sharing presentations with audio, or ...
Building your own computer can be a rewarding and cost-effective way to get a high-performance machine tailored to your specific needs. However, it also requires careful planning and execution, and one of the most important factors to consider is the time it will take. The exact time it takes to ...
Sleep mode is a power-saving state that allows your computer to quickly resume operation without having to boot up from scratch. This can be useful if you need to step away from your computer for a short period of time but don’t want to shut it down completely. There are ...
Introduction Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT) has revolutionized the field of translation by harnessing the power of technology to assist human translators in their work. This innovative approach combines specialized software with human expertise to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of translations. In this comprehensive article, we will delve into the ...
In today’s digital age, mobile devices have become an indispensable part of our daily lives. Among the vast array of portable computing options available, iPads and tablet computers stand out as two prominent contenders. While both offer similar functionalities, there are subtle yet significant differences between these two devices. This ...
A computer is an electronic device that can be programmed to carry out a set of instructions. The basic components of a computer are the processor, memory, storage, input devices, and output devices. The Processor The processor, also known as the central processing unit (CPU), is the brain of the ...
Voice Memos is a convenient app on your iPhone that allows you to quickly record and store audio snippets. These recordings can be useful for a variety of purposes, such as taking notes, capturing ideas, or recording interviews. While you can listen to your voice memos on your iPhone, you ...
Laptop screens are essential for interacting with our devices and accessing information. However, when lines appear on the screen, it can be frustrating and disrupt productivity. Understanding the underlying causes of these lines is crucial for finding effective solutions. Types of Screen Lines Horizontal lines: Also known as scan ...
Right-clicking is a common and essential computer operation that allows users to access additional options and settings. While most desktop computers have dedicated right-click buttons on their mice, laptops often do not have these buttons due to space limitations. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on how to right-click ...
Powering up and shutting down your ASUS laptop is an essential task for any laptop user. Locating the power button can sometimes be a hassle, especially if you’re new to ASUS laptops. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on where to find the power button on different ASUS laptop ...
Dell laptops are renowned for their reliability, performance, and versatility. Whether you’re a student, a professional, or just someone who needs a reliable computing device, a Dell laptop can meet your needs. However, if you’re new to Dell laptops, you may be wondering how to get started. In this comprehensive ...
Two-thirds of the country think that “New Zealand’s economy is rigged to advantage the rich and powerful”. They also believe that “New Zealand needs a strong leader to take the country back from the rich and powerful”. These are just two of a handful of stunning new survey results released ...
In today’s digital world, screenshots have become an indispensable tool for communication and documentation. Whether you need to capture an important email, preserve a website page, or share an error message, screenshots allow you to quickly and easily preserve digital information. If you’re an Asus laptop user, there are several ...
A factory reset restores your Gateway laptop to its original factory settings, erasing all data, apps, and personalizations. This can be necessary to resolve software issues, remove viruses, or prepare your laptop for sale or transfer. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to factory reset your Gateway laptop: Method 1: ...
“You talking about me?”The neoliberal denigration of the past was nowhere more unrelenting than in its depiction of the public service. The Post Office and the Railways were held up as being both irremediably inefficient and scandalously over-manned. Playwright Roger Hall’s “Glide Time” caricatures were presented as accurate depictions of ...
Roger Partridge writes – When the Coalition Government took office last October, it inherited a country on a precipice. With persistent inflation, decades of insipid productivity growth and crises in healthcare, education, housing and law and order, it is no exaggeration to suggest New Zealand’s first-world status was ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – In 2022, the Curriculum Centre at the Ministry of Education employed 308 staff, according to an Official Information Request. Earlier this week it was announced 202 of those staff were being cut. When you look up “The New Zealand Curriculum” on the Ministry of ...
Chris Bishop’s bill has stirred up a hornets nest of opposition. Photo: Lynn Grieveson for The KākāTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate from the last day included:A crescendo of opposition to the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill is ...
Monday left me brokenTuesday, I was through with hopingWednesday, my empty arms were openThursday, waiting for love, waiting for loveThe end of another week that left many of us asking WTF? What on earth has NZ gotten itself into and how on earth could people have voluntarily signed up for ...
Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.State of humanity, 20242024, it feels, keeps presenting us with ever more challenges, ever more dismay.Do you give up yet? It seems to ask.No? How about this? Or this?How about this?Full story Share ...
Determining the hardest sport in the world is a subjective matter, as the difficulty level can vary depending on individual abilities, physical attributes, and experience. However, based on various factors including physical demands, technical skills, mental fortitude, and overall accomplishment, here is an exploration of some of the most challenging ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
The National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...
A significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...
New Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...
Today’s advice from the Climate Change Commission paints a sobering reality of the challenge we face in combating climate change, especially in light of recent Government policy announcements. ...
Minister for Disability Issues Penny Simmonds appears to have delayed a report back to Cabinet on the progress New Zealand is making against international obligations for disabled New Zealanders. ...
The Government’s newly announced review of methane emissions reduction targets hints at its desire to delay Aotearoa New Zealand’s urgent transition to a climate safe future, the Green Party said. ...
Distinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...
The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...
The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...
A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
Refreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...
Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson is speaking at the International Wool Textile Organisation Congress in Adelaide, promoting New Zealand wool, and outlining the coalition Government’s support for the revitalisation the sector. "New Zealand’s wool exports reached $400 million in the year to 30 June 2023, and the coalition Government ...
The Government is making legislative changes to make it easier for new early learning services to be established, and for existing services to operate, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. The changes involve repealing the network approval provisions that apply when someone wants to establish a new early learning service, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra In the free-for-all between the Australian government and Big Tech boss Elon Musk this week, the government had to be on a winner. Most people would have little sympathy with Musk’s vociferous opposition to ...
Asia Pacific Report Chief Mandla Mandela, a member of the National Assembly of South Africa and Nelson Mandela’s grandson, has joined the Freedom Flotilla in istanbul as the ships prepare to sail for Gaza, reports Kia Ora Gaza. Mandela is also the ambassador for the Global Campaign to Return to ...
Pacific Media Watch Journalists who report on environmental issues are encountering growing difficulties in many parts of the world, reports Reporters Without Borders. According to the tally kept by RSF, 200 journalists have been subjected to threats and physical violence, including murder, in the past 10 years because they were ...
Analysis by Dr Bryce Edwards, Democracy Project (https://democracyproject.nz)Political scientist, Dr Bryce Edwards. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has surprised everyone with his ruthlessness in sacking two of his ministers from their crucial portfolios. Removing ministers for poor performance after only five months in the job just doesn’t normally happen in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra BagzhanSadvakassov/Upsplash, CC BY-SA Australia’s inflation rate has fallen for the fifth successive quarter, and it’s now less than half of what it was back in late 2022. ...
ACT's Rural Communities and Veterans spokesman Mark Cameron responds to cancellations and protests of ANZAC Day commemorations in Wellington. He says, "These pitiful attempts to detract from ANZAC Day are not at all indicative of the feelings of mainstream ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Meighen McCrae, Associate Professor of Strategic & Defence Studies, Australian National University American and Australian stretcher bearers working together near the front line during the Battle of Hamel in 1918.Australian War Memorial While the AUKUS alliance is new, the Australian-American partnership ...
Pōneke based peace activists staged a silent protest at the ANZAC day service to highlight New Zealand’s complicity in war and genocide, and urge the government to take concrete steps to stop the genocide in Palestine. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Magdalena M.E. Bunbury, Postdoctoral Researcher, James Cook University Burial with a horse at the Rákóczifalva site, Hungary (8th century AD).Sándor Hegedűs, Hungarian National Museum, CC BY How do we understand past societies? For centuries, our main sources of information have been ...
Amanda Thompson doesn’t really do Anzac Day. But what she does do is remember the people she knew who had a lifetime to remember stuff they didn’t really want to, because of a war they didn’t ask for. And she does make Anzac biscuits.First published in 2021.All my ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kathryn Willis, Postdoctoral Researcher, CSIRO Xavier Boulenger/Shutterstock In the two decades to 2019, global plastic production doubled. By 2040, plastic manufacturing and processing could consume as much as 20% of global oil production and use up 15% of the annual carbon ...
With our collective remembrance, and steadfast belief in our common humanity, we strengthen our hope and resolve to do what we can to foster dialogue and understanding, and to heal divisions in our pursuit of peace. ...
Principal reasons for the opposition is the loss of the public’s democratic right to have “a fair say” and the vital need for a government free from corruption, said Casey Cravens of Dunedin, president of the New Zealand Federation of Freshwater ...
Never mind the scoreboard – in the 2000 Bledisloe Cup decider, the real trans-Tasman battle was won before kickoff.First published in 2016. The dawn of the new millennium was a dark time for the All Blacks. Their final game pre-Y2K was a 22-18 loss to South Africa in the ...
I’m on the wrong side of 40, I never pursued creative work and now my job is killing my soul. Help! Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nzDear Hera,May I start with the least original conversation opener you’re likely to hear around the motu at the moment, particularly in Wellington: ...
“Never again - No AUKUS” was the message of the wreath laid at this morning’s national ANZAC Day commemorative service at Pukeahu National War Memorial Park this morning by the Stop AUKUS group. ...
Until this month, Auckland swimmer Hazel Ouwehand had never met a qualifying time in an Olympic event for a New Zealand team, even as a junior. Now she’s very likely off to the Paris Olympics after swimming well under the qualifying standard in the 100m butterfly twice – both in ...
While Anzac Day has experienced a resurgence in recent years, our other day of remembrance has slowly faded from view.The Sunday Essay is made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand. Original illustrations by Hope McConnell.First published in 2022.The high school’s head girl and ...
Australian and New Zealand volunteers fought together in the Waikato War, yet still its place in the Anzac tradition is unacknowledged by our defence forces or Returned Services Association.First published in 2018.When I was a boy cub I attended Anzac Day services in the South Auckland suburb of ...
A poem by Wellington writer Tayi Tibble.Hoki Mai She kisses him goodbye with her eyes still wet and alight from their last swim in the Awatere river. At the train station celebration, she leads the Kapa Haka but her voice keeps breaking under and over itself like waves. ...
A poem from Bill Manhire’s 2017 book of verse Some Things to Place in a Coffin.My World War I Poem Inside each trench, the sound of prayer. Inside each prayer, the sound of digging. Image courtesy of Auckland War Memorial Museum. ...
There are three books I have wolfed down in one sitting over the last two years. Colleen Maria Lenihan’s gorgeous and sad debut Kōhine, Noelle McCarthy’s memoir Grand about becoming her mother and then unbecoming her, and now Hine Toa, a staunch yet gentle self-portrait by living legend Ngāhuia te ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Thursday 25 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Asia Pacific Report Students and activist staff at Australia’s University of Sydney (USyd) have set up a Gaza solidarity encampment in support of Palestinians and similar student-led protests in the United States. The camp was pitched as mass graves, crippled hospitals, thousands of civilian deaths and the near-total destruction of ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James B. Dorey, Lecturer in Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong Australian teddy bear bees are cute and fluffy, but get a look at that massive (unbarbed) stinger! James Dorey Photography Most of us have been stung by a bee and we ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jen Roberts, Senior Lecturer, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong Aussie~mobs/FlickrVictor Farr, a private in the 1st Infantry Battalion, was among the first to land at Anzac Cove just before dawn on April 25 1915. Victor Farr ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne Gregory Moore I had the good fortune to care for the sugar gum at The University of Melbourne’s Burnley Gardens in Victoria where I worked for ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra BagzhanSadvakassov/Upsplash, CC BY-SA Australia’s inflation rate has fallen for the fifth successive quarter, and it’s now less than half of what it was back in late 2022. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rachel Ong ViforJ, ARC Future Fellow & Professor of Economics, Curtin University Just when we think the price of rentals could not get any worse, this week’s Rental Affordability Snapshot by Anglicare has revealed low-income Australians are facing a housing crisis like ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Meighen McCrae, Associate Professor of Strategic & Defence Studies, Australian National University American and Australian stretcher bearers working together near the front line during the Battle of Hamel in 1918.Australian War Memorial While the AUKUS alliance is new, the Australian-American partnership ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tracey Holmes, Professorial Fellow in Sport, University of Canberra When the news broke last weekend that 23 Chinese swimmers had tested positive to a banned drug in early 2021 and were allowed to compete at the Tokyo Olympic Games six months later ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Cally Jetta, Senior Lecturer and Academic Lead; College for First Nations, University of Southern Queensland Australian War MemorialAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised this article contains names and images of deceased people, as well as sensitive historical information ...
RNZ News Melissa Lee has been ousted from New Zealand’s coalition cabinet and stripped of the Media portfolio, and Penny Simmonds has lost the Disability Issues portfolio in a reshuffle. Climate Change and Revenue Minister Simon Watts will take Lee’s spot in cabinet. Simmonds was a minister outside of cabinet. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Lindenmayer, Professor, Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University laurello/Shutterstock Some reports and popular books, such as Bill Gammage’s Biggest Estate on Earth, have argued that extensive areas of Australia’s forests were kept open through frequent burning by ...
Analysis - Christopher Luxon framing the demotion of two ministers as the portfolios getting "too complex" is a charitable way of saying they weren't up to the job. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra With Jim Chalmers’s third budget on May 14, Australians will be looking for some more cost-of-living relief – beyond the tax cuts – although they have been warned extra measures will be modest. As ...
Analysis: Melissa Lee has lost the media portfolio and her spot in Cabinet after multiple failed attempts to find solutions for a media industry in crisis. On Wednesday, the Prime Minister announced Lee would be losing her spot in Cabinet along with her media and communications ministerial portfolio. The job ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Simon Wilmot, Senior Lecturer, Film, Deakin University Among the many Australian who served during the second world war, there is a small group of people whose stories remain largely untold. These are the Muslim men and women who, while small in number, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kelly Saunders, PhD Candidate, University of Canberra There has been much analysis and praise of Justice Michael Lee’s recent judgement in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case against Channel Ten. Many people were openly relieved to read Lee’s “forensic” and “nuanced” application of law ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kathy Gibbs, Program Director for the Bachelor of Education, Griffith University zEdward_Indy/Shutterstock Around one in 20 people has attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It’s one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood and often continues into adulthood. ADHD is diagnosed ...
The Fairer Future coalition of anti-poverty groups say Whaikaha must be properly funded going forward, and that to argue that poor financial management of the new Ministry is a red herring by the Prime Minister. ...
The Taxpayers’ Union is today congratulating Hon. Paul Goldsmith on his appointment as Minister for Media and Communications and urges him to rule out state intervention in the private media sector. ...
Asia Pacific Report The West Papuan resistance OPM leader has condemned Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Joe Biden, accusing their countries of “six decades of treachery” over Papuan independence. The open letter was released today by OPM chairman Jeffrey P Bomanak on the eve of ANZAC Day ...
Welcome to The Spinoff Books Confessional, in which we get to know the reading habits and quirks of New Zealanders at large. This week: writer and one of Time Magazine’s 100 most influential people of 2024, Lauren Groff.The book I wish I’d writtenIf I wish I’d written a ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Fechner, Research Fellow, Social Marketing, Griffith University mavo/Shutterstock Imagine having dinner at a restaurant. The menu offers plant-based meat alternatives made mostly from vegetables, mushrooms, legumes and wheat that mimic meat in taste, texture and smell. Despite being given that ...
“Three Strikes is a dead-end policy proposed by a dead-end government. The Three Strikes law ignores the causes of crime, instead just brutalising people already crushed by the cost of living.” ...
By Don Wiseman, RNZ Pacific senior journalist An Australian-born judge in Kiribati could well face deportation later this week after a tribunal ruling that he should be removed from his post. The tribunal’s report has just been tabled in the Kiribati Parliament and is due to be debated by MPs ...
With its clear mandate for police use, political nuances, and nuanced public trust, Denmark's insights provide valuable considerations for Australia and New Zealand. ...
Books editor Claire Mabey reviews poet Louise Wallace’s debut novel. A famous poet once said to me that he’s always suspicious when a poet publishes a novel. I never really understood why but maybe it’s something to do with cheating on your first form. Louise Wallace is a poet. She’s ...
For a few months at the turn of the millennium, TrueBliss burned bright as the biggest pop stars in the country. Alex Casey chats to two superfans who still hold the flame. During a humble backyard wedding in Nelson, 1999, one of the cordially invited guests had to excuse themselves ...
How will the recent wave of job cuts impact ethnic diversity in the media? In November last year, I was working a very busy day in the newsroom of a large online news site, interviewing whānau about their concerns over the imminent closure of one of the few puna reo ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ruth Knight, Researcher, Queensland University of Technology Have you ever felt sick at work? Perhaps you had food poisoning or the flu. Your belly hurt, or you felt tired, making it hard to concentrate and be productive. How likely would you be ...
Despite heavy criticism and an ongoing select committee process, the Police Minister says the Government will forge ahead with a ban on gang patches. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sam Whiting, Lecturer – Creative Industries, University of South Australia Shutterstock Everyone has a favourite band, or a favourite composer, or a favourite song. There is some music which speaks to you, deeply; and other music which might be the current ...
A new survey says ‘outlook not great’ for those charged with building infrastructure, while RMA changes delight farmers and depress environmentalists, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. First RMA changes announced ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Olli Hellmann, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Waikato Getty Images When New Zealanders commemorate Anzac Day on April 25, it’s not only to honour the soldiers who lost their lives in World War I and subsequent conflicts, but also ...
This story about Tim Groser says it all too: http://www.stuff.co.nz/4785450a6160.html
Environmentalists that are not either.
Well, kiwis voted for change apparently – no surprise that the authors of New Zealand Sucks would have to cancel Buy New Zealand before introducing Sell New Zealand…..
“Ms Bradford questioned Mr Brownlee’s decision, and said that since it began the campaign had resulted in more people supporting local products.”
Really – if Sue can provide any evidence of this it would be interesting. I doubt there is any such evidence and the money would indeed be better spent elsewhere.
This is really really sad. I felt this campaign was just starting to gain some traction, many people I know were starting to look out for NZ made goods, taking pride in supporting the locals.
The sad part is the locally made brands that have since shut up shop and gone overseas: macpac, swandry, fisher & pykael etc. and now this government is axing buying kiwi made. What a kick in the guts for our local manufacturers.
This government really is opposed to everything kiwi.
I would expect that the choice of phrase used by SP was a deliberate misrepresentation given that the decision is to review not cancel:
The alternative is to simply support government spending without any consideration of the benefits.
Local manufacturers want more than a tv advertising campaign. Given where there are heading, some liberalisation of employment law would be one thing that could help but we all know what the response to that would be here.
How come you refer to it as the National/Act Government when the Maori Party and UF is in it too?
[lprent: Because I know that there is a strong congruence between the right wing of the Nats in cabinet and Act. That is likely to provide the political access of this government. The Maori Party IMO doesn’t have any real allies in the Nats cabinet except for a few National Maori MP’s, only one of whom has any real standing.
IF the MP manages to make a real impact (ie not just edge stuff like UF does), then I might change my opinion.]
HS: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0812/S00047.htm
“On top of that, independent research carried out on the effectiveness of the Buy Kiwi Made campaign proves that consumer, retailer and manufacturer awareness and support are steadily increasing.
“The most recent evaluation, in November 2008, shows that 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before the marketing programme began.
Would be interesting to see the actual research and how this was assessed – I would expect this to be part of the review as to how effective or not it has been.
I felt this campaign was just starting to gain some traction, many people I know were starting to look out for NZ made goods, taking pride in supporting the locals.
That’s the complete reverse of my perception. A quick survey of my colleagues – just as scientific as “many people I know” 🙂 – came to the opposite conclusion.
Those of us that already actively seek out NZ made goods where possible aren’t changing our spending patterns based on the ad, and those of us that have other priorities (price etc) we never going to change in the first place.
On both counts, that’s a failed campaign.
lukas,
I don’t recall you ever asking why the righties here used to refer to the previous govt as the “Clark-Peters” govt. although it too included two other parties.
I wonder why.
Felix, I always thought of it as having Jim and UF also.
The ‘Buy NZ made campaign’ could’ve been SSSOOOOOOO much better.
The expensive ads with Oliver as a robot do nothing.
All they need is a damn good website cataloging all the NZ made stuff & an option to buy online. Then a few cheaps TV-ads directing people to the site.
The current adds & website are flashy non-sense.
lukas, indeed it should be referred to as the 4 headed (5 if you include the co-leaders) monster that it is! Good point
Stupidest idea to get rid of Buy NZ made campaign… what the hell were they thinking?
“Stupidest idea to get rid of Buy NZ made campaign what the hell were they thinking?”
1) That its not the job of the government to promote one product over another. Its the job of the producers to promote their product.
2) If you really do believe in New Zealand bussinesses then stop spending money on silly ad campaigns and give them more liberalized employment laws (90 day bill etc). That way they can determine their own future.
“All they need is a damn good website cataloging all the NZ made stuff & an option to buy online. Then a few cheaps adds directing people to the site.”
That makes sense
Quite a good idea for a buynz.co.nz have a list of NZ retailers selling NZ only stuff. Would work quite well I’d imagine.
lukas its pretty obvious that the 2 main players in the current govt are Nat and Act who don’t actually need the other two parties and that the Maori Party were only added as a backstop to disempower Act should the tail start to wag the dog.
Also it gives Nat the opportunity to grab more Maori left leaning voters before the next election. Still at the end of the day its exactly what the were accusing the left of being……… “A multi headed monster” (my term, as the number of heads dosn’t matter – just the fact that they’re there)
“NACT” + others
I haven’t seen the ads so I can’t comment on the value of this specific campaign, but it’s surely worthwhile to keep promoting the general principle of buying NZ made goods.
Phil’s comment above reminds me of some of the misguided comments I read after the repeal of section 59 which were along the lines of “Oh look, a kid was killed today so clearly changing that law was a waste of time”.
We’re talking about attempts to shift attitudes over the long term, changes which are measured not in months and years, but decades and generations.
I like NX’s idea. Perhaps we should push for NX to be put in charge of this campaign? 😉
The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!
I’m with NX on the website idea, though I know I personally have started spending a lot more money in shops displaying the “Buy Kiwi and we’ve got it made” stickers/signs.
Love the classic sneak tactics – “we can’t commit more cash to this unless a review shows it to be effective” … with no actual statement that a review will, in fact, be carried out.
(Sure, one could read an implication that a review will be done, but then either Brownlee’s PR advisor or the NZPA should have said “forthcoming review” to ensure clarity of meaning. No, I’m not obsessed with semantics, why do you ask?)
Few reasons why I buy kiwi made (where possible):
-Local Economy. When I buy a kiwi made product that money is going to help keep locals employed.
-Ethics. The people making the goods are receiving a decent wage and working conditions.
-Quality. Generally the products are better quality and will last. They’re not going to wind up 6 months later in a landfill.
Sure :). And I accept the generous salary which probably goes with the job.
Telling people to simply ‘buy NZ made’ isn’t good enough.
Information is the key. TradeMe & eBay are great for finding exactly what you want.
There are some great NZ made safety gear – likes footwear etc. Half the problem is finding where to get the stuff. So a website to tie it all together would be great.
I would also widen the website’s scope to include products made with environmental considerations – irrespective of where they’re made.
‘Conscious consumerism’ is the future in my opinion. Where people can choose to spend their money on things that are important to them.
Information is the key. All going well we wouldn’t even need the ETS/carbon trading rubbish.
ak said on
December 8, 2008 at 10:33 am
“Well, kiwis voted for change apparently – no surprise that the authors of New Zealand Sucks would have to cancel Buy New Zealand before introducing Sell New Zealand ..”
I can’t better what you just said, so I’ve repeated your post.
Hope you don’t mind me using your words.
Come to think of it… they could have an ‘NZ made’ search option on TradeMe. The search could be refined for ‘new’ and ‘second hand’.
^ I’m sure that would be more helpful than the Oliver Robot.
Greg, being “efficient” is not the sole determinant of the worth of an enterprise. Many “inefficient” things (ie. the public service, Air NZ, manufacturing) are better retained locally — to do otherwise puts them at risk of insecurity/profiteering/asset stripping. Also, surely fair trade is better than “free” trade?
As it is, NZers are effectively “subsidising” profits to overseas corporations — to the tune of $5 billion (or more) per year:
Felix said on
December 8, 2008 at 11:58 am “We’re talking about attempts to shift attitudes over the long term, changes which are measured not in months and years, but decades and generations.”
That is what NZers never understood about the real legacy of the Labour plus Government.
That NZers had the energy and the independence and the confidence to complain about Labour is due in large part to Labour giving them their mana back.
The only problem with helping people is when they’re back on their feet, the last thing they want to be is forever beholden to the people who helped them. But Labour was concerned with investing in a country that could once again make its own product not be buying 3rd rate product in and losing export monies.
Daveski – I bet you hate that the Labour Government wouldn’t let employers pay Mexican wages to New Zealanders. No doubt you’ll be pleased to have the ‘NZ sucks’ National Party in. By the time N/act’s finished engineering the employment laws NZers will be leaving here to get better wages in Mexico.
Well Buy NZ hasn’t helped my biz one little bit and I have used NZ design, supply, manufacture, marketing, products, services, bloody NZ everything. Amounts to diddly squat when the cheque comes to be written. Maybe I am just too inefficient. Mind you my industry has no competition from overseas companies.
Any marketing campaign needs to have measurable results. While it sounds good for Bradford to claim 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before, where is the proof that this is translating into dollars spent on Kiwi-made. And are the surveyed shoppers actually the target market for this campaign? Do you even know who the target market is? Low income earners? Beneficiaries? Or just ‘the rich’.
What NZ made goods are lower income earners meant to buy? Can they afford the generally higher cost of buying NZ made goods when the imported alternatives are so much cheaper and means they can still buy Christmas presents for their kids?
Do NZ made goods need to compete on price? If so are we prepared to have lower wages in order to make this possible?
If we aren’t expecting the low income earners to be part of the target market of this campaign then who is it, and what are the likely products they will buy that are NZ made?
Let’s see the business case for this campaign, and some real measurable outcomes. It seems to me that the millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on this campaign are misguided and wasteful.
Jum – you miss my point going for the dramatic riposte.
If you asked employers, I’ll bet you that the majority would suggest a raft of activities that would benefit business beyond a simple advertising campaign. No where did I infer a desire to lower wages.
My point is that an advertising campaign won’t be enough to stop manufacturers moving off shore.
Are things still actually being Made in NZ ? Besides food (& beverage) products, what else do we actually make in NZ ?
That NZers had the energy and the independence and the confidence to complain about Labour is due in large part to Labour giving them their mana back.
How dare that ungrateful middle class not vote for Labour after all we’ve done for you!
vidiot; houses
vidiot:
Backpacks, outdoor gear, plastic wear, clothing, bikes, furniture, jewelery, glassware, tools, software, tires, timber, wind farm turbines, boats, bedding etc.
Its out there if you look for it.
Kevin Rudd has told Australians to spend for the economy and to Buy Australian Made for the obvious benefits for Australian workers and the economy.
I notice my supermarket has labels on shelfs indicating NZ made products. I usually choose the NZ one if there is a choice.
Some brands I know of made in NZ:
-Cactus Climbing: good quality backpacks made in Christchurch
-Sistema: plastic containers
-Click-Clack: plastic containers, still local I think?
-Survival: merino thermal clothing
-CCC: Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury, used to make the old All Blacks jerseys until the rugby union sold them out to Adidas. Now makes socks and some clothing.Most stuff made at Christchurch factory, some is Chinese though.
-Rembrant: suit makers
-Chalky Digits: clothes
-Firestone: tires
Anyone want to expand? Im sure there’s more.
How does being NZ Made make something intrinsicly better?
Should we be buying NZ made TVs?
Cars?
Should we have import controls?
Why do we need govt to tell us to buy NZ made? Why can’t we do it ourselves? Why can’t manufacturers band together, and promote it themselves. This (Buy NZ Made regardless of price or quality) is simply corportate welfare and nationalism. Not sound economic policy.
I’ll buy NZ made if I like the product (I love supporting *good* local music, food, clothing etc) and it is well priced, not because its made in NZ, but because I want it.
“Greg
December 8, 2008 at 12:12 pm
The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!
”
And its bad for the environment as its an ineffecient use of scarce resources.
No wonder the Greens are all for it, being environmentalists and all!
PS: how on earth do I type a pound sign? Its in the captcha!
Any of you lefties got any evidence that this campaign has resulted in the purchase of single NZ made product that would not otherwise have been bought? Warning: if anyone replies using the word “awareness” I will personally hunt you down and knee you in your soft bits.
Billy – I went from buying NZ made goods about half or the time to buying them almost exclusively. Part of the reason I was able to do this was it raised awareness amongst retailer that NZ Made was a selling point and they actually started clearly labeling goods as such…
Oh and Billy – I don’t have soft bits. I’m 100% hard-ass.
Ha! Cap is “IV Pierson”! does Steve have a habit he’d rather not talk about…
MikeE,
Who says “Buy NZ Made regardless of price or quality”? Quote? Link? Or just paraphrasing your own arse?
Billy,
It’s all about awareness.
It was canceled because like a lot of the Green’s programmes it didn’t produce enough good results.
Also the concepts of the ads were wrong, it should of been buy NewZealand made because we produce the best at the best price, not just buy NewZealand made for the sake of it.
“It was canceled because like a lot of the Green’s programmes it didn’t produce enough good results.”
And National’s programmes produce better results?
Women do most of the shopping and women are discerning shoppers. Most women I know look for NZ made things because they are good quality and different eg kumfs and minnie cooper shoes (I’ve stopped buying Minx now they’re made in China). We are very conscious that Buy NZ made also means NZ jobs as well. Women are also label readers in supermarkets.
What really urks me is when you come across a NZ brand that has traded on being quality and locally made but has recently moved to Asia e.g. Macpac, Fairydown.
They try and tell you its exactly the same quality as you’re used to. Somehow I doubt a wage slave in China is going to make an equal quality product compared to a happy worker on a decent wage in NZ.
Buy NZ made only works as a campaign, if we are thinking about campaigning about the positive things about New Zealand as a whole.
The National party don’t particularly want to arouse nationalist sentiment that might be annoying when they introduce PPPs or saying yes to whatever Australia and the U.S. say.
The things that define us, or make us nationalistic: that have been our ‘brand’ if you will are not always things this government is comfortable with.
Our environmentalism (well and truly on the wane), being tidy repsonsible kiwis, our nuclear free and independent foreign policy, our multiculturual and inclusive society, the idea of giving someone a fair go, and indeed good faith and fairness in general, the idea of looking after people who can’t look after themselves and caring for others in need…
so many of these things are well in truly at odds with the National Party or they simply don’t care about them. How can they try and talk up a brand they don’t care that much about?
I just love how Janet seems to think she represents every female in New Zealand. In fact I’m always astounded when anyone here believe they represent the whole of New Zealand. I’m sorry you don’t.
The Buy NZ campaign was pretty dire I think. I didn’t really get it. Here was some ultra-technological factory building a robot that happened to be Oliver Driver who I find awful. New Zealand doesn’t exactly build many technological things that a consumer can easily buy at the shop. The campaign was a huge misstep and personally never made me more New Zealand products.
Thus I really am not concerned that the campaign was suspended.
Perhaps the National Party think that this is the kind of thing that the business community will provide out of its evident self interest? you know like banks and lending to people who are able to pay back and that kind of thing?
waiting with baited breathe.
It’s up to businesses to be self sustaining Paul, it would be a poor excuse for a business that relied on government funding to survive. Why should taxpayer money be spent on marketing costs for NZ businesses?
I am amused that a left wing blog is trying to defend this campaign. It’s very apparent that it’s only because it was Bradford’s project. If National had launched the campaign you would all be up in arms about it being a way for them to be lining the pockets of their business buddies.
leftrightout:
You should never buy a product just because it comes from your country.
You should buy the best product for the best price.
Where does the article you link to say that the Buy New Zealand campaign has been cancalled?
Pierson, your points would be taken far more seriously if they weren’t so well embellished with bullshit.
G
Brett,
“You should buy the best product for the best price.”
Yep, but all other things being equal, of course you should support local businesses. It keeps more money here for us and it uses less transportation which is better environmentally.
So Brett, my question is: If you have to choose between a foreign product and a local one of equal quality, how small does the price difference have to be before you’d pick the NZ product?
It sounds like you’re saying it’s zero, whereas I happily pay a few percent more to support local workers and local businesses. Why? Because I’m selfish. I want local businesses and local workers to be better off because then I’m better off in the long run.
Brett:
What motivates me to buy kiwi made is that my action of buying that product is resulting in jobs for kiwi’s, keeps profits in NZ and thats good for New Zealand. The last thing I want to see is us become a nation of retailers who just sell imported junk.
I can always buy the alternative, the cheap imported shit from China, after all its the best product at the best price. But then Id be supporting one of the biggest polluters in the world, bank-rolling what is effectively slave labour and undermining local kiwi’s.
Sometimes you’ve got to ask whats behind the price tag.
I wasn’t aware there was a Buy New Zealand campaign on…..
Chess Player
Considering chess players have to think 10 moves ahead, I’m thinking you meant to type that you were a ‘cheese maker’.
Waiting for maturity can take forever with cheese.
Regarding buying NZ Made, personally discern on two levels,
food always buy NZ made/grown products in the supermarket (unless there is not a local version available or more than 25% higher priced)*
Otherwise best value on everything else (though I avoid Norwegian, Japanese or any other whaling murdering bastard countries product)
* Does not apply to booze (though I only buy NZ wines) and chocolate
Re chocolate – there is a distinct flavour difference between NZ and Australian chocolate, even that under the Cadbury brand. I think it is something to do with the lush NZ grass NZ cows eat.
GC Of course I don’t claim to represent NZ women but I have a wide circle and we discuss topics such as this. In fact were talking about this with a group just yesterday and we all agreed that we take care to buy NZ made. We don’t automatically buy Fisher and Paykel any more – in fact some actively boycott it after the NZ factory closures.
Heaven forbid that I would agree on anything with women like Judith Collins.
As a friend of mine pointed out, Labour in 1935 brought in the ethos of the Welfare State to give all New Zealanders help when they needed it. The National Party was transmogrified from the ashes of the ruling elite in 1936 to get rid of the Labour Party’s plan to be there for all NZers.
Now, I always read the rightie posts with that thought in mind.
The Left considers how they can help local business (YES, even the very businesses which would shaft them with the 90day probation period).
The Right only ever think of themselves.
This election was never about a change of face. It was about the destruction of a unifying philosophy, in order to allow for a foreign takeover bid, using divide and conquer tactics.
Consumers always will buy the best product at the best price. Putting Oliver Driver on TV telling us to pay more for a sub-standard product just because it will help the bloke down the road was never going to convince anyone at the till.
though I only buy NZ wines
Now there is a local industry worth celebrating!
woo!
I happily pay a few percent more to support local workers and local businesses. Why? Because I’m selfish. I want local businesses and local workers to be better off because then I’m better off in the long run.
What if your “better off” comes at the expense of the chinese labourer that used to make shoes, and now gets nothing?
What do you see as a bigger loss of income: the guy that goes from NZ minium wage to the unemployment benefit OR the guy in China going from a few cents a day to nothing at all?
Janet
Totally agree.
If only women realised that, as the major buyer or influence on buying decisions, their power is huge. If they ever decide to form a lobby group country-wide they could easily bring a company down, whatever its size.
The said company had better hope the lobby group consists of left-leaning (as I stated at 5.37) women who won’t want to damage the company or its workers!
Putting aside the obvious*, I’ve always wondered about the philosophical basis for these “buy NZ made” campaigns.
Are we saying that we should be more worried about the plight of NZers over the plight of Chinese people? Why should we care that plastic stuff comes out of China, and each time you buy plastic stuff from China the per capita GDP there gets a little bit closer to ours (but still miles behind)?
Do we care about human welfare, but only if it’s humans within our borders…?
* How can anyone complain about actually checking to see whether “Buy New Zealand made” is value for money? If I hire someone to clean my windows, I need to check that they’ve done a decent job before I decide to hire them again. I’d be a moron if, instead of checking the windows in front of me, I spent hours debating whether window-cleaners are a good idea in principle… National is absolutely within its rights to review the previous government’s expenditure and find out whether the money might be better spent on something else. That’s the job we pay them to do.
Chess Player is the only person who used “awareness” who does not get a knee in the groin.
The captcha included my reasonably uncommon surname. Too spooky when added to the “Pierson” thing in ‘sod’s.
Jum
Women have organised themselves into a consumer lobby before. CARP – campaign against rising prices – was very effective in the 1960s/1970s. I think Cath Kelly, mother of the CTU’s Helen Kelly, was one of the main activists.
I think (memory hazy here) that the 3rd Labour govt’s maximum retail price (Warren Freer’s MRP campaign) was one of the results. Regulations to limit prices of consumer goods. Now wouldn’t that be a good idea again! That would shock the righties above.
Re Jimbo
December 8, 2008 at 5:54 pm
I’m intrigued and suspicious. If National is so concerned about value for money re Buy NZ Made, why didn’t they check earlier and bleat then.
I guess they knew it would have made them sound like they didn’t care about small NZ business and workers pre-electionand now of course they can bleat about this and cover up on the nasty little sidelines they are pursuing, with forcing unemployment up through businesses falling over, if less attention goes on Buy NZ Made and thereby creating their dreamed of weak, desperate labour force.
NZers ‘are’ still so comfortable under the inclusive previous Government they don’t believe ‘nouveauNational’ can hurt their future. I know better.
“Buy kiwi made” was an 8 million dollar accommodation for the greens, a complete waste of money and more proof (if you needed it) of the left’s myth that throwing large amounts of cash at something will fix it. Good riddance
Buy NZ Made is a member based organisation funded by members, the Government campaign is the Buy Kiwi Made Campaign.
Buy NZ Made won 50% funding from one of the Buy Kiwi Made Campaign’s funding rounds to build a website to advertise New Zealand Made goods and to connect manufacturers, retailers and consumers with them.
This website has been up and running since September the 1st and has been advertised on web and in magazines. It has also been mentioned in the latest Buy Kiwi Made radio advertisements.
So for those of you who were wishing for a website which catalogues NZ Made goods .. your wish is granted. The website currently shows over 2000 products which is not bad for such a new site. This site is lilkely to grow considerably over the next few months.
Go to http://www.getnzmade.net
Trina
Thanks for the correction.
Madeleine
December 8, 2008 at 5:39 pm
So you are telling me that NZ made/Kiwi made is sub-standard product?
Trina – would you care to comment on this.
Trina
Thanks for that link. That’s just the sort of website I would use when looking for specific items for the house or presents etc.
@Tim: Riiight.
Heh I had you in the grip of angry reason and then lost it all with the quote tags.
basically, mate, you are an idealogue of the worst sort. I understand the sentiment. I even appreciate that we can’t run on subsidies, and if we are doing that for profitable industries it is completely wrong.
However we don’t live in a free trade society. If you are consistent and not just an idiot troll I expect to see you supporting business taking the full cost of their carbon pollution as soon as possible.
sorry? Was that taxpayer money should not be spent subsidising business unless it is a large amount?
Realisitically in a small country government has a role to play in helping business in this way. If the National party were really nationalists, they would be doing that, instead of searching for ways to reduce costs for their chums in international cartels.
“So you are telling me that NZ made/Kiwi made is sub-standard product?’
Actually, thats what this entire campaign is doing. To me, the government steping in to promote a product suggests that the product is not good enough to be sold on its own merits and that it needs to be protected or it will not be able to compete with others.
Some people in this thread refer to a ‘New Zealand sucks’ campaign. Well clearly if they think that New Zealand products should be protected through this campaign or other measures then they are the ones who think that New Zealand products suck.
Nope. Just pissing on a dead man’s legacy.
RIP Rod Donald.
“ropata
December 8, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Greg, being “efficient’ is not the sole determinant of the worth of an enterprise. Many “inefficient’ things (ie. the public service, Air NZ, manufacturing) are better retained locally — to do otherwise puts them at risk of insecurity/profiteering/asset stripping. Also, surely fair trade is better than “free’ trade?
As it is, NZers are effectively “subsidising’ profits to overseas corporations — to the tune of $5 billion (or more) per year:
Transnational corporations (TNCs) make massive profits out of New Zealand. These can truly be called New Zealand’s biggest invisible export. In the decade 1997-2006, TNCs made $50.3 billion profits. Only 32% was reinvested, and in some years more was sent overseas than was earned or the reinvestment was significantly offset by capital being taken out of the country.”
Ropata – you’ve just stumbled upon the economic concept of comparative advantage. Of course transnational corporations make profits out of New Zealand. But we make a hell of a lot off our exports too. You can’t have one but not the other. Are you suggesting we cut off all trade? Comparative advantage is gained when when each country specialises in what they’re best at and trade (well there’s more to it then that but we’ll leave it there). That way each country makes the most effective use of its own resources. Protectionist measures like the ‘buy NZ made ad campaign inhibit this and its makes NZ and the rest of the world worst off.
On your other points. Air NZ and manufacturing are classic examples of industries that should not be propped up by the government. In Air NZ’s case competitors like pacific blue, quantas etc etc will keep them honest whether they’re owned by NZ or China. Manufacturing is a part of the buy NZ made answer. We should only keep manufacturing goods that we can produce efficiently. Thats why we don’t have a car industry. Its much cheaper for us to import – look to the states to see how a subsidised car industry is further crippling their economy. In the Public service efficiency results in the best result anyway – we want the services provided by the public service to cost as little as possible so we can have lower taxes and more money to spend!
I get pretty passionate about this ‘fair trade’ thing. I too want save the starving in africa. But did you know trade barriers cost the third world a hell of a lot more than the amount of aid we give them. The facts are there – google it (I can’t be bothered, its late). ‘Unfair trade’ is far far far better than no trade at all. The fact is – countries who engage in trade even if its from sweatshops improve over time – look at Japan. Buying their ‘cheap and nasty’ products is the best help we can give them.
Paul – “However we don’t live in a free trade society. If you are consistent and not just an idiot troll I expect to see you supporting business taking the full cost of their carbon pollution as soon as possible.”
Yeah sure. But a couple of points. Business won’t take the brunt of the cost, it will be passed onto the consumer – lets not forget that. Also that means some businesses get carbon credits too right, if their net emissions are negative?
Greg.
I believe this is how it has to work. The cost of carbon will be a long term cost. It will not go away. We have to be prepared to pay more, and the businesses which can become the most efficient and therefore offer cheaper prices are rewarded.
This market system is something isn’t it?
This is what the Greens have been arguing for a long time.
If our business adapts like other businesses internationally, (and I’m not completely clued in on the ins and outs of a carbon trading market) yes! it would be fantastic if we could get carbon credits for nett emissions. I know some companies particularly airlines offer carbon offset options or the like where they buy or invest in tracts of forestry.
I don’t see what the problem is with this. If we don’t we are passing the bill on to our children and grandchildren, rather than attempting to recognise and deal with the problem. I also realise it is a joke to blame National solely for this. Almost everyone in NZ is complicit in inaction for too long.
Anyway that’s the theory. I did study a small bit of biology and economics, but never got near farm accounts or forrestry work.
I’m not sure if negative net emissions equals credits under the currently proposed and soon to be rehacked scheme. Anyone know?
Greg,
one other thing mate:
I’m sure all those U.S. military Korean war contracts were helpful too, to help keep the munitions and arms factories running and turn them into car manufacturers and the like.
We should buy New Zealand for the same reason everyone else does overseas, it is a niche quality fashionable brand, and we are a unique part of it. As I mentioned above, it is hardly the most of protectionist measures out there, if it really is truly one at all.
The government is just involved in a campaign like the Woolmark or the beef and lamb campaign, but what they are selling is the quality of our country overall, which suprisingly I would say they have a stake in.
Efficiency and market clearing is a laudable goal. But your argument goes beyond economics into sovereignty. Everything can be done more efficiently. But more efficiently for whom? Without Air New Zealand there might be more efficient air travel,, but it is in New Zealand’s public good to have a national carrier who supports our tourism industry.
Manfacturing can be different, but it is sometimes very difficult to compete marketing a smaller product against mass produced brands dumped in large chain stores. Hence a little support with the marketing, and the promotion of quality behind a Made in NZ sticker.
cheers.
Phil,
“What if your “better off’ comes at the expense of the chinese labourer that used to make shoes, and now gets nothing?”
Didn’t I explain that I’m selfish? Anyway…
The Chinese labourers you mention have very little protection. They don’t have the workplace rights that our unions have fought hard for and won.
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to imply that you’re supporting Chinese labourers by buying goods made in China – you’re supporting their exploitation. Massive profits are made off their labour by denying them proper work rights and that’s what you’re supporting.
I prefer to support the rights of workers by buying products made by workers who have rights.
My understanding, and correct me if I’m wrong, but Ive heard that for IceBreaker its so cheap to manufacture in China that they can produce the merino wool here, ship it to China to be made into clothes, and have it shipped back again.
Now how are local manufacturers supposed to compete against that without support from the government?
leftrightout,
Why, by lowering our workplace standards to be closer to those of China of course. I heard Roger Douglas on the radio just the other week praising the “efficiency” of Chinese industry.
Just pissing on a dead man’s legacy.
Rod Donald’s legacy is a bunch of ads that make Oliver Driver appear stupider thatn he already is and make fat ad exec’s rich? That’s unspeakably sad. I thought he’d done lots of good stuff.
Felix, yes “efficiency”, just like how the public service is about to become more “efficient”…
@Paul
“basically, mate, you are an idealogue of the worst sort. I understand the sentiment. I even appreciate that we can’t run on subsidies, and if we are doing that for profitable industries it is completely wrong.”
Are you suggesting we should subsidise unprofitable industries? I’m all for helping kiwi businesses get up and running and I reckon $6.3 million would be very helpful if it was applied the right way. I had a small business myself about 5 years ago and would have loved the government to be more helpful rather than making me jump through bureaucratic hurdles. In the end I had to lay off 5 staff and find a job.
On the topic of this post, it is sensible to review any campaign to see whether it is delivering results, rather than just keep chucking money at ad agencies. There are probably some parts of the campaign that will be kept after review, such as the getnzmade.net website (which I don’t recall seeing anything about on the TV ad by the way), but the point is that reviewing the campaign is the right thing to do.
Regarding your insults, I’ll be up here on the high road mate.
Paul – on your first post, I agree. On the second, not so much:
“‘im sure all those U.S. military Korean war contracts were helpful too, to help keep the munitions and arms factories running and turn them into car manufacturers and the like.
We should buy New Zealand for the same reason everyone else does overseas, it is a niche quality fashionable brand, and we are a unique part of it. As I mentioned above, it is hardly the most of protectionist measures out there, if it really is truly one at all.
The government is just involved in a campaign like the Woolmark or the beef and lamb campaign, but what they are selling is the quality of our country overall, which suprisingly I would say they have a stake in.
Efficiency and market clearing is a laudable goal. But your argument goes beyond economics into sovereignty. Everything can be done more efficiently. But more efficiently for whom? Without Air New Zealand there might be more efficient air travel,, but it is in New Zealand’s public good to have a national carrier who supports our tourism industry.
Manfacturing can be different, but it is sometimes very difficult to compete marketing a smaller product against mass produced brands dumped in large chain stores. Hence a little support with the marketing, and the promotion of quality behind a Made in NZ sticker.”
Yeah Japan did benefit from foreign investment. Something that will happen to all third world countries as their economies improve and the risk lessens. If they can get themselves off the ground first. Why should the government sell New Zealand to New Zealanders? There may be an argument for doing this overseas but preaching to the converted is a bit silly isn’t it? And why does an air carrier have to be public owned to support our tourism industry? Surely its in any air carriers commercial interests to promote tourism. Its more benefit for them!
If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses.
Felix – “The Chinese labourers you mention have very little protection. They don’t have the workplace rights that our unions have fought hard for and won.
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to imply that you’re supporting Chinese labourers by buying goods made in China – you’re supporting their exploitation. Massive profits are made off their labour by denying them proper work rights and that’s what you’re supporting.
I prefer to support the rights of workers by buying products made by workers who have rights.”
Again, this kind of statement really gets under my skin. Your supporting Chinease workers by not buying their goods. How the hell is that meant to make them better off? They’ve gone from a crap job to no job. A crap job being a hell of a lot better than no job at all.
@Tim
No I’m suggesting that subsidies are not necessarily a good thing, especially as we used to have them for our most productive sectors. I notice you had no reply to why the taxpayer should be bailing out industries on Kyoto agreements. If it walks like a fish mate, irrespective of what road it’s walking on.
@Greg
I don’t know if being occupied by the U.S. after the second world war, and getting a kickstart from large military contracts, is quite the same practically and morally as buying coffee or small local industries from developing countries.
If the government doesn’t sell the New Zealand brand who will? The media relentlessly paint us disproportionantly as a country over run by crime. I remember the irony of the 90s when the only companies to use patriotism in their advertising were overseas countries- Toyota ‘welcome to our world’ and Barry Crump, McDonalds and the Kiwiburger…there are 2 or 3 other examples but I can’t think of them just at the moment.
The point with mass production is not, I don’t think, efficiency leading to the best use of scarce resources. It is that a large company can get a strong advantage in marketing its products, and getting exclusive or very favourable distribution deals, which make competing for small manufacturers (and retailers for that matter) very difficult. Not particularly perfect market stuff.
Well if one is made in New Zealand and one is made elsewhere it isn’t identical is it? There are all kinds of reasons why people choose a particular brand. Could be the safety standards of a country, where their sister lives, their human rights record, their favourite sports team, passing fads…
I understand the argument you are making, but especially in times of economic hardship, I think you will be hard pressed to find any practical examples of it in action internationally. As I said we don’t live in a free trade world, and we have to be careful with the baby and bathtub. Which is my way of saying, brain hurt, have to go work. cheers.
“Any marketing campaign needs to have measurable results. While it sounds good for Bradford to claim 360,000 more shoppers think Kiwi-made than before, where is the proof that this is translating into dollars spent on Kiwi-made. And are the surveyed shoppers actually the target market for this campaign? Do you even know who the target market is? Low income earners? Beneficiaries? Or just ‘the rich’.
What NZ made goods are lower income earners meant to buy? Can they afford the generally higher cost of buying NZ made goods when the imported alternatives are so much cheaper and means they can still buy Christmas presents for their kids?
Do NZ made goods need to compete on price? If so are we prepared to have lower wages in order to make this possible?
If we aren’t expecting the low income earners to be part of the target market of this campaign then who is it, and what are the likely products they will buy that are NZ made?
Let’s see the business case for this campaign, and some real measurable outcomes. It seems to me that the millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on this campaign are misguided and wasteful.”
The only thing you know about marketing it seems is how to spell it!!!!!
“The ad campaign is bad for New Zealand. Its a shocking waste of tax payers money. Here’s why:
Econ101 – Consumers that choose to spend more to buy New Zealand made purely because its from New Zealand effectively provide a subsidy to the producer.(This is not the case if the purchase of the NZ made product is rational – ie its cheaper or better quality) These consumers are subsidising inefficient businesses (if they were efficient they wouldn’t need government funded ad campaigns), This decreases consumers disposable income so they have less to spend on efficient kiwi producers. New Zealand as a whole would be far better off if inefficient producers instead moved into efficient industries. This subsidy increases producer surplus but consumer surplus is decreased by more than that increase – hence this policy results in a dead weight loss – wasted money!”
More like this comment is a wasted amount of internet space!!!! What a load of crap
“If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses”
That is NOT what the campaign is all about agghhhh, and this just shows how agghhhh you are in the subject of marketing, in fact, business, agghhhh
“If your going to try and compete directly with a mass produced brand it is going to be hard. Because they’re more efficient at producing it. I’ve got no problems with making the conscious decision to buy kiwi made on the basis of quality – but what I’m saying is that if you’ve got two identical goods and one is more expensive because its kiwi made. The only people that will benefit from you purchasing the kiwi one is the producer of that good. Everyone else loses.”
Proves my point, you know fuck all about marketing
Just remember that those adverts and posters and what not is a very very small part of marketing. It is not the whole marketing concept, it is a piss ant in comparrison so you cant judge a marketing campagin from some dumb arse picture or advert. There is a hell of a lot to marketing than advertising!!!