What is Paul Eagle doing?

17 comments on “What is Paul Eagle doing? ”

• Comments are now closed

1. Johnr 1

   22 September 2022 at 1:02 pm

   It seems to me that he is behaving like someone who has made politics a career and will jump from pillar to post, wherever a perceived vote is. And, the greatest ego stroking is achieved.

   I'm fast coming to the belief that political life should have a definite term. Maybe 5 terms spread over both local and central govts with a max of 3 terms in any one forum
2. Tiger Mountain 2

   22 September 2022 at 2:29 pm

   Go Tory Whanau! is almost all I can say…

   …except for also saying–if these Mayoral Candidates are the cream, that the brains trust of the Capital City can front, then it is everyone for themselves and look forward to more awesome public art–in the form of effluent fountains.
   • roy cartland 2.1

     22 September 2022 at 3:25 pm

     Tory, Tamatha and Yadana are my main picks. Green spaces, public art, public transport, walkability… it's almost as if they think the city should be halfway bearable for the people that live there!
3. Ad 3

   22 September 2022 at 3:57 pm

   Looks like he's sensibly sucking Andy Foster's centre right votes out of a close race, since the Green vote isn't shiftable.

   The big new Wellington cycleways are on NZTA and Kiwirail land, other than the ones around the waterfront to Shelley Bay that are now either construction or in procurement already.

   If Eagle does get Mayor, guarantee he gives Iona Pannett a decent Committee Chair so she can stick it to the Greens that shafted her.
   • Poission 3.1

     22 September 2022 at 4:34 pm

     He may be endorsed by Labour,but he is standing as an independent,hence not fully entwined with central planning.

     He lives in Island Bay and fully understands the problems with bikelanes,and the damage that it does to communities that actually live there,especially the destruction of retail in Newtown.
     • Ad 3.1.1

       22 September 2022 at 5:24 pm

       Wellington must have one of the most disempowered of New Zealand's city mayors.

       No useful control of any water, road transport, public transport. Nearly zero influence over airport or port.

       No useful influence over planning.

       Employment 90% bought and paid by government.

       How WCC make so many arguments break out over so little is unreal.
       • Poission 3.1.1.1

         22 September 2022 at 7:15 pm

         They got captured by neo politics of outsourcing or selling ( or giving away assets) which reduced debt,which then returned as substantive investment was required for EQ strengthening and replacement of substantive award winning assets.
       • William 3.1.1.2

         23 September 2022 at 12:39 am

         I don't believe it's the role of the mayor to have control over those things.

         The Local Government Act 2002 states in section 41A;

         Role and powers of mayors

         (1) The role of a mayor is to provide leadership to—

         (a) the other members of the territorial authority; and

         (b) the people in the district of the territorial authority.

         (2) Without limiting subsection (1), it is the role of a mayor to lead the development of the territorial authority’s plans (including the long-term plan and the annual plan), policies, and budgets for consideration by the members of the territorial authority.

         (3) …

         It carries on, giving the mayor power to appoint the deputy mayor & establish committees etc (but also empowering the council members to overturn those decisions by the mayor).

         Does 'leadership' entail having influence or control over other authority members?

         Well, the next line grants the same 'leadership' over people in the district of the territorial authority. If that means people of the district should roll over and accept the mayor's say so for the next three years, I've got a citizens revolt to get involved with. Therefore, the mayor is merely one vote among the other councilors.

         You may be comparing to the Auckland mayor's role. That role is defined in the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 section 9;

         Mayor of Auckland

         (1) The role of the mayor is to—

         (a) articulate and promote a vision for Auckland; and

         (b) provide leadership for the purpose of achieving objectives that will contribute to that vision.

         (2) Without limiting subsection (1), it is the role of the mayor to—

         (a) lead the development of Council plans (including the LTP and the annual plan), policies, and budgets for consideration by the governing body; and

         (b) ensure there is effective engagement between the Auckland Council and the people of Auckland, including those too young to vote.

         (3)…

         I'd suggest that

         "articulate and promote a vision for Auckland; and

         provide leadership for the purpose of achieving objectives that will contribute to that vision."

         gives the Auckland mayor significant control over the direction of Auckland Council.

         You refer to "No useful control of any water, road transport, public transport. Nearly zero influence over airport or port."

         Each city council in greater Wellington still gets to set a budget for water maintenance and infrastructure builds, but the work is coordinated & sometimes undertaken by Wellington Water, which is owned by all the councils.

         Each council controls its own local roads, public transport is the responsibility of Wellington Regional Council (which at least means buses & trains are coordinated over the whole region, and the regional councilors that caused the bus stuff up either resigned or were booted out three years ago).

         WCC owns 34% of the airport but the other shareholder owns 66%, so the council effectively has zero control. Compare that to Auckland where the council only owns 18%, but the next largest holding is 10%, and there are multiple smaller holdings.

         WCC has no direct control over the port because it is owned by Wellington Regional Council (77%) & Horizons Regional Council (23%).
         • Ad 3.1.1.2.1

           23 September 2022 at 5:13 am

           All you've pointed out is that I was right.

           We could do a whole history of local government over both Labour and National since 1989 and show the same thing.

           Wellington Council has been fractious and poorly run, even as it declines in influence.
           • William 3.1.1.2.1.1

             23 September 2022 at 10:19 am

             You stated

             "Wellington must have one of the most disempowered of New Zealand's city mayors.

             No useful control of any water, road transport…" etc

             I was pointing out that no NZ mayor (other than Auckland) has control of any of those things because the legislation doesn't grant it to them. Councils can have control, some more so than others, depending on what has happened in the past.

             MS's post is about Paul Eagle standing for mayor of Wellington, and your comments clearly referred to the role of the Wellington mayor. So no, I was not pointing out you were right.
             • Ad …

               23 September 2022 at 10:34 am

               If I'd wanted to comment on the legislative powers of the mayor within NZ local government, I would have.

               Certainly lack of agency within Wellington Council derives from a vast legislative history of disempowerment and corporatisation going back deep into the 1980s.

               The degree of conflict within Wellington Council occurs despite its lack of agency over much at all. You haven't altered that.
       • Martin C 3.1.1.3

         23 September 2022 at 10:35 pm

         Time for a commissioner.
     • William 3.1.2

       23 September 2022 at 12:16 pm

       I too live in Island Bay and can assure you Paul Eagle only understands how to use an issue to enhance his chance of getting where he wants to be.

       You mention the bikelanes, he initially opposed them, even going so far as announcing a joint ticket for mayor/deputy mayor with conservative councilor Nicola Young (before being convinced that was not a good idea). She was not a local councilor but had seen it as a chance to raise her profile. He later changed his position and voted to build the lanes. He lost a lot of supporters in the anti crowd over that.

       The "damage that it does to communities" would include the cyclist killed in Auckland last week while riding on a bikelane identical to the previous Island Bay layout.

       The "destruction of retail in Newtown" so far totals the florist who lost parking nearby when the supermarket was built 10 years ago, but who has now closed blaming the bikelanes, the brew shop that was supportive of lanes but seemed to rely on trucks stopping on no stopping lines in a busy intersection, and the furniture shop that has moved 100m down the road to much much larger premises.
   • swordfish 3.2

     22 September 2022 at 10:47 pm

     Far rather a feet-on-the-ground Eagle / Pannett combo than the alternative.
4. Peter 4

   22 September 2022 at 4:38 pm

   What is Paul Eagle doing? Heading back to Parliament as an MP?
5. Ad 5

   22 September 2022 at 6:59 pm

   If Collins doesn't make it there will be plenty of columns wondering why Collins didn't do the same as Eagle.
6. Dot 6

   8 October 2022 at 9:50 am

   Today something very important has happened

   Peter Ellis has finally received JUSTICE

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS