What support are the Nats giving beneficiaries?

Written By: - Date published: 11:05 am, March 26th, 2010 - 84 comments
Categories: benefits - Tags:

Paula Bennett is saying that her benefit bashing policies are about “supporting people into work”.

What is that support?

I see punishment. I see threats. Where’s the support?

Cutting DPB mums’ benefits if they don’t get work. That’s not supporting them. Making unemployed people reapply for their benefit after a year. That’s not supporting them.

What would be supporting people into work?

How about a training allowance? Like the one cut by Bennett. How about investing in job creation? So there are actually jobs to go into.

The kind of questions some enterprising journo could be asking? You know, challenging the minister to show proof of her claims. You know, accountability and all that.

84 comments on “What support are the Nats giving beneficiaries?”

  1. The English language certainly has been bastardised by this lot. “Green mining”, “support” by a “kick in the pants”

    How very 1984ish.

  2. Tigger 2

    The market is meant to provide jobs…isn’t that what they believe?

  3. tc 3

    love the pic of clowns at a sideshow…how very very very apt. Mouth open nothing else going on.

  4. dave 4

    While you are correct, it would be good to have seen “proof of claims” that Labour did the same (supporting people into work). WINZ acts no differently under National than it did under Labour.

    • Bright Red 4.1

      How about the decrease in the number of people on the dole from 158,000 when the entered office to 17,000?

      “WINZ acts no differently under National than it did under Labour”

      well, they don’t offer the training allowance for dpb mums anymore. And it’s not really about using winz, it’s about other job creation policies.

      Creating jobs is the important thing where National is failing, not connecting people to them once they’re created.

  5. gobsmacked 5

    Some facts about Paula Bennett:

    She is now an MP (taxpayer-funded).

    Before that, she worked in Murray McCully’s office (taxpayer-funded).

    Before that, she was a student (taxpayer-funded).

    Before that, she had a training allowance (taxpayer-funded).

    Before that, she inherited some money.

    So, when, exactly, did Paula Bennett pull herself up by her bootstraps? And when will a journalist get around to asking her?

    • prism 5.1

      Interesting facts gobsmacked

    • Jum 5.2

      So she’s never been out in the nasty wee world like the people she is treating like shxt then?

      Once the sunshine that’s been coming from the same area on John Key stops blinding journalists to the truth, then they may ask her.

      • uke 5.2.1

        Don’t hold your breath on those craven journos – there’s always plenty of “smokescreen news” for their editors send them running after.

  6. torydog 6

    Bennetts like all tories……they take full advantage of the system….then we they have had their fill they try and scrap it!!!…so generous and so king.

    That old saying……..”you can never trust a tory” is spot on!

  7. Darel 7

    The DPB is not a lifestyle choice and there is no cycle of dependency to break.

    The number of people on the DPB doesn’t vary greatly and it is trending down as a proportion of the population.

    Two thirds use the benefit for 5 years or less, ie not for the life of the child.

    10% are on the benefit 10 years or more. That doesn’t prove much except it reiterates that most don’t stay on it for long.

  8. Jum 8

    Unfortunately, belonging to the NAct gene pool means that Paula Bennett has no empathy gene. She cannot understand the simple rule of helping people out of poverty; it’s one step at a time, with support, as Labour had been doing but nobody in Labour was out there enough to blow that trumpet.

    Note to Bennett: you’re just the same as Richardson or Douglas, and believe me; that’s not a compliment. Your party rates you highly; I suggest you have a good look at why.

  9. rainman 9

    WINZ is not about helping people to find work, in my experience. I was made redundant last year and have struggled to find roles in my field (and don’t even get responses to applications when I take a more “speculative” approach and punt for things that I don’t have solid experience in). Where there are roles that I have good experience for there is a lot of competition as my circumstances are hardly unique. I’ve had a few interviews, but no offers, in short.

    My partner is a teacher (fixed contract until end of last year – as she has been since she started teaching; perm teaching jobs are scarce) so while she was employed I was ineligible for any UB financial assistance. Fair enough – there are plenty worse off than us, and however much it’s tough to live on a teacher’s wage, we’re getting by. I went to WINZ last year to talk about retraining or any other options for getting into work other than what I’ve been doing, but they had little interest and no options. The dialogue pretty much went “hang on, I’m sure we can find some financial support for you”, “no, it’s OK, I don’t want the money, just some help to find work or retrain”, “Oh. can’t help then. Are you watching the job board?”

    We’re at least getting some money in – but the long term prospects aren’t great, and will probably end up with us being more state-dependent rather than less. The Nats aren’t known for long-term thinking, though.

  10. Lindsay 10

    Darel,

    “Two thirds use the benefit for 5 years or less, ie not for the life of the child.

    10% are on the benefit 10 years or more. That doesn’t prove much except it reiterates that most don’t stay on it for long.”

    What your statistics fail to account for is that many people have multiple spells on the DPB. Your statistics only apply to each continuous spell. At end June 2007 43,866 had been on the DPB at least once before. For example someone who has been on the DPB for less than a year in their current spell may well have been on it for much longer cumulatively.

    “The number of people on the DPB doesn’t vary greatly and it is trending down as a proportion of the population.”

    It hasn’t varied greatly in the last 20 years. But in the 17 before that it grew from 8,000 to 98,000.

    And I am not sure what great improvement it delivered. Fewer violent relationships? More secure and productive adults? Less juvenile crime (one of the reasons the DPB was introduced was to allow mothers of wayward kids to stay at home)? Greater freedom and choice for mothers?

    • Bright Red 10.1

      “It hasn’t varied greatly in the last 20 years. But in the 17 before that it grew from 8,000 to 98,000.”

      It’s trending down as a portion of the pop you fucken dimwit.

    • Jum 10.2

      Lindsay,
      I assume you want to retain the DPB safeguard for women but are seeking reasons for continued violence and numbers supposedly increasing.
      You quoted some great statistics, but you forget you are dealing with the vagaries of people. Bit like economists do.

      Before we consider the end result that another blogger Lindsay Mitchell, as appearing on Paul Henry’s Breakfast/National/Act show, would want i.e. no safeguard for women with children, which she believes would force them to stay in relationships no matter how unsafe they may be, we shall concentrate on the finer points of ‘reality’ for women.
      Women and men are emotional creatures. Society’s view of men and of women is vastly different. You will find that that simple premise plays a huge part in what occurs in relationships. Also, the judgment of that society (religious groups, other women) foisted on women, and it is always women, especially those who have failed to keep their man or been raped or seduced or battered, is one of censure.
      Looking carefully at the dynamics of the solo mother with children, censured by society, judged by WINZ, ‘cubicled’ by this government and disrespected by many men encountering them results in the inevitable loss of confidence, loss of a living wage (for looking after children), and more scarily for the children she gets the message that without a man she is not an equal human being. We already have issues with those who appear to have a certificate of humanhood and those who don’t in the current welfare legislation. We already ‘think’ women are not equal, because we do not pay them equally. We don’t even pay them to look after children. We give them an income that looks after the child.
      If this society does not value the women (and some men) who raise these children alone, you will get the bad side the violence, the benefit cheating e.g. live in boyfriend collects her benefit, does not support her and she ends up in court for cheating on the benefit, yet that was her and her child’s only income/wage actual case, Lindsay. She did not believe in her own importance in her child’s life. Get that right and your problem will solve itself, providing that the importance is accompanied by the responsibility. There we might have some agreement on ensuring a watching brief.

      I also think more men should be looking after babies as solo dads. Certainly, the child may be raised in quite a different way and society will view that occupation as being more important, given the way they view what men do and what women do as more or less worthy. Remember the pay equity gap when you are considering this Lindsay.

      Unfortunately, the Paula Bennetts and the Lindsay Mitchells of the world only think in black and white, unless it affects them.

      PS I’ve just realised what you might have been suggesting and that is to charge the fathers of the babies to pay all the living costs, not just some. But then that means they would want to control the mother of that child. Is that what you meant, Lindsay, to keep women under control? As a woman do you really suggest that? What if the guy is hurting the mother or the child, Lindsay? Do you think the woman should have him sent to gaol, but then that will cost the country a lot more, especially if no rehabilitation takes place under private prison management, and she’d still be alone. It’s all a bit of a worry. Surely, if government treated women equally, it would eventually trickle down to those men treating women equally and then I really think the DPB numbers would drop and so would the violence. Sadly, when people like Brian Tamaki are telling men they have divine right to control women in whatever way they need, well, it’s just gonna take longer isn’t it.

    • QoT 10.3

      And I am not sure what great improvement it delivered.

      Well, you know, some women probably managed to feed and clothe their children.

  11. Anne 11

    well said Bright Red.

  12. mcflock 12

    ‘ere, BR, you can’t treat an “artist and welfare commentator” like that!

    You’re implying that web-searching statisticsNZ and the Cato Institute is no substitute for knowing what you’re talking about.

    That’s unfair discrimination (not Bennett’s “fair” discrimination) against economic sociopaths.

  13. Darel 13

    @Lindsay I do appreciate that people move on and off the DPB. I think that’s more likely to mean people are using the benefit well rather than not, eg working for a while and then not. But its not very strong evidence for anything really. The main point I want to make is to dispel the myth of women going on the benefit for a lifestyle it isn’t if the vast majority work for some or a lot of the time their child or children makes them eligible for the benefit.

    I only have stats since 1996. I accept on face value your recitation of the stats (I’m just using MSD ones myself) that it grew. But why it grew is because the state wouldn’t force men to pay for their children. The DPB was the response. It had nothing to do with allowing mothers with wayward children to stay at home according to the report I read (which is at home so can’t cite it, I think it was a parliamentary report, certainly official).

    The improvement is that children are supported. Better would be fewer benefits because men (and now some women) financially support their children. Better yet would be all the support a child needs.

  14. Lindsay 14

    It never escapes me that none of you address the points I make.

    Yes the DPB was trending down very slowly during the economic boom. The trend has reversed. It may be a short-term reversal due to the recession. It might not be. I was agreeing with Darel’s statement that “the number doesn’t vary greatly.” In the past 20 years the variance has been within a 15 percent margin.

    Did you have anything to offer about the level of dependence in terms of duration of stay or how society has benefited from the DPB?

  15. Lindsay 15

    Darel, I posted my comment before seeing your response.

  16. Lindsay 16

    Darel,

    At least a third of single parents currently on welfare started there as teenagers. As MSD records only extend to 1996 (anyone older than 29 isn’t captured) the percentage is likely to be considerably higher. Many started not on the DPB or EMA but the dole. In low socio-economic communities having babies and going on welfare is not an uncommon event. The teen birthrate in the poorest decile is ten times that in the wealthiest. Before they acquire educational qualifications or work skills a couple of thousand each year get pregnant and opt for a benefit. They continue to add children to their exisiting benefit. And they cannot command a wage that is better than their benefit income. That to me represents a lifestyle choice. This group tend to stay on welfare the longest and have children at the greatest risk of poor health, low educational achievement etc. My interest isn’t just theoretical. As a volunteer I see this happening and some of the outcomes.

    Bob Gregory, an Australian Professor of Economics, has done some unparalleled work into how long women rely on welfare for and has identified distinct groups. He estimated that the average length of dependence is 12 years.

    At the same time there are certainly many people who use the DPB temporarily and I don’t have a problem with that.

    When the DPB was introduced it was for a raft of reasons. The government may officially state some (eg to enable women to exit violent relationships) but other groups who lobbied for it had their own. The failure to secure maintenance from fathers (who were imprisoned for not supporting their families) was definitely a factor. I think some of this is covered in Margaret McClure’s work, A Civilised Community. I will see what references I can find.

    Chidren are supported but not well. The children that are the focus of groups like the CPAG are mainly those on welfare.

    Thank you for the reasonable exchange.

    • prism 16.1

      Hey Lindsay you say –
      “The teen birthrate in the poorest decile is ten times that in the wealthiest. Before they acquire educational qualifications or work skills a couple of thousand each year get pregnant and opt for a benefit. They continue to add children to their exisiting benefit. And they cannot command a wage that is better than their benefit income. That to me represents a lifestyle choice. ”

      Nice of you to volunteer in the social field but you say “At the same time there are certainly many people who use the DPB temporarily and I don’t have a problem with that.” It doesn’t sound as if you are very supportive of the women that you see as you volunteer work. Also what’s this lifestyle choice you’re talking about. Not much of a lifestyle, and a choice of struggling on the DPB and raising children or struggling at some low-waged job not enough for a family to live on and also raising children.

      I mentioned earlier in the week on Open Mike I think about the interview with the trust that is running schools where young mothers (and fathers) can go and finish their education, taking their babes with them and caring for them while they are studying. Perhaps you could trace that, and give us your experience of how that is working in your area, or if not available. It is very positive towards ‘breaking the cycle’ which I agree with you can happen as young women are stuck in domesticity and poverty.

  17. Lindsay 17

    Some groups lobbied for the introduction of the DPB because of the rapid urbanisation of Maori. Maori have always had higher overall and, in particular, teen birth rates. While rurally children were supported by extended whanau, particularly grandparents, when the young moved to the cities these sources of support dried up.

  18. mcflock 18

    Okay then:
    “And I am not sure what great improvement it delivered. Fewer violent relationships? More secure and productive adults? Less juvenile crime (one of the reasons the DPB was introduced was to allow mothers of wayward kids to stay at home)? Greater freedom and choice for mothers?”

    Let me do my own web search for things I agree with – oh, look: http://nzchildren.co.nz/injuries.php#figure1

    Rate for assault-related hospital admissions for children has more than halved in the last 18 years, assault-related mortality is also trending down over the last 18 years. It must be the DPB. All hail the DPB! [sarc tag for L’s benefit].

    I second Bright Red’s assessment.

    heh – anti-spam was “childs”. Yep, it’s all about the childs.

  19. prism 19

    Bearing and having children tends to be a woman thing. I don’t know whether you are a man or woman Lindsay but it is very hard to work and bring up children successfully. Males criticising women on the DPB is common, having children is not their thing. Some females like to sneer also at the young woman who isn’t ‘good and careful’.

    If the social system was helpful and proactive, the stats for DPBs and children would be better. Making fathers pay till the child is adult may lead to a violent relationship developing. Just because a man loses some sperm doesn’t mean he had any commitment to the result. It would be better if the young women were given lots of help particularly in their child’s early years, if they choose to not involve an unsatisfactory father.

  20. Fabregas4 20

    Living on the dole or DPB must be awful – this is true. Ask yourself would like to do it. Many people need the dole or DPB because circumstances make this so. These circumstances include people making mistakes – like teenagers having babies and need – losing jobs, lack of opportunity, being brought up in dysfunctional families, violent or abusive relationships, – lots of reasons.

    What do we do as a nation? I like us better when we say that we will support these people (all the while knowing that people are people and some will take advantage but that it is so important to support the needy that those problem people are worth putting up with) rather than when we paint everyone in need as losers and bludgers.

    There but for the grace of God (or this government) go we or our mothers or fathers, sisters, or brothers or more likely our children.

  21. Lindsay 21

    Prism, It’s a struggle in our eyes but if that is all you have known since birth, and expectations of you are low, securing your own income has a certain prestige albeit with that income can come worthless hanger-ons (ironically increasing the incidience of violence). The women I have worked with are usually the mums who do not want their daughters following in their footsteps. They are people who have asked for help. But as long as the benefit is there the chances of them doing just that are heightened.

    I support the teenage parent units and the 8 teenage parent co-ordinators employed by the health department. One I know personally and even she will tell you that money has everything to do with having a child, or having another. Susan Baragwanath used to say that was one of her most difficult challenges. Convincing her girls not to have another child. Unfortunately the numbers catered for at teen parent units are only a drop in the barrel.

    I was very nearly a teenage parent myself so it isn’t a prudish and moralisitic opposition. I simply find the idea of paying young impressionable people what seems like a relatively good income for becoming a parent, foolish.

  22. Jum 22

    Lindsay, I left a message for you further up but you may not have seen it.

    I assume you want to retain the DPB safeguard for women but are seeking reasons for continued violence and numbers supposedly increasing.
    You quoted some great statistics, but you forget you are dealing with the vagaries of people. Bit like economists do.

    Before we consider the end result that another blogger Lindsay Mitchell, as appearing on Paul Henry’s Breakfast/National/Act show, would want i.e. no safeguard for women with children, which she believes would force them to stay in relationships no matter how unsafe they may be, we shall concentrate on the finer points of ‘reality’ for women.
    Women and men are emotional creatures. Society’s view of men and of women is vastly different. You will find that that simple premise plays a huge part in what occurs in relationships. Also, the judgment of that society (religious groups, other women) foisted on women, and it is always women, especially those who have failed to keep their man or been raped or seduced or battered, is one of censure.
    Looking carefully at the dynamics of the solo mother with children, censured by society, judged by WINZ, ‘cubicled’ by this government and disrespected by many men encountering them results in the inevitable loss of confidence, loss of a living wage (for looking after children), and more scarily for the children she gets the message that without a man she is not an equal human being. We already have issues with those who appear to have a certificate of humanhood and those who don’t in the current welfare legislation. We already ‘think’ women are not equal, because we do not pay them equally. We don’t even pay them to look after children. We give them an income that looks after the child.
    If this society does not value the women (and some men) who raise these children alone, you will get the bad side the violence, the benefit cheating e.g. live in boyfriend collects her benefit, does not support her and she ends up in court for cheating on the benefit, yet that was her and her child’s only income/wage actual case, Lindsay. She did not believe in her own importance in her child’s life. Get that right and your problem will solve itself, providing that the importance is accompanied by the responsibility. There we might have some agreement on ensuring a watching brief.

    I also think more men should be looking after babies as solo dads. Certainly, the child may be raised in quite a different way and society will view that occupation as being more important, given the way they view what men do and what women do as more or less worthy. Remember the pay equity gap when you are considering this Lindsay.

    Unfortunately, the Paula Bennetts and the Lindsay Mitchells of the world only think in black and white, unless it affects them.

    PS I’ve just realised what you might have been suggesting and that is to charge the fathers of the babies to pay all the living costs, not just some. But then that means they would want to control the mother of that child. Is that what you meant, Lindsay, to keep women under control? As a woman do you really suggest that? What if the guy is hurting the mother or the child, Lindsay? Do you think the woman should have him sent to gaol, but then that will cost the country a lot more, especially if no rehabilitation takes place under private prison management, and she’d still be alone. It’s all a bit of a worry. Surely, if government treated women equally, it would eventually trickle down to those men treating women equally and then I really think the DPB numbers would drop and so would the violence. Sadly, when people like Brian Tamaki are telling men they have divine right to control women in whatever way they need, well, it’s just gonna take longer isn’t it.

    • prism 22.1

      Jum That Lindsay Mitchell woman – the name clicks. I think she has been agitating about the DPB for years. Interesting that Paul Henry would have her on. Of all the women interested in the matter of the DPB in all the universities Humanities Departments, in all the cities and towns of NZ he found her. Think she lives in Wellington actually, probably handy for him.

  23. Lindsay 23

    Jum, I want a safeguard. A safety net. But not a long-term gaurantee (bar exceptional cases).The secure income and house provided by the state attract men who want all the benefits of a relationship but none of the responsibilities. Controlling men who prey on women financially and psychologically. Do you know about the Ruka Ruling? Did you know that we now pay women to live with violence? The very ticket out of a bad relationship is now a passport for abuse to continue.

    When the DPB was introduced women generally were in a far more disadvantaged position than they are today. The opportunities and expectations of them now are based on their ability to foot it along side males in almost all respects. I can’t agree with your view of society and government as treating women as inferior or of lesser value. But there are societies within societies, granted.

    Your original comment did not appear earlier.

    • toad 23.1

      Lindsay, the Deadbeat Dads issue is one that has long concerned me.

      Men, often on substantial incomes, are able to organise their affairs to minimise their child support (and their income tax). Meanwhile, the State pays for the upbringing of their children via the DPB paid to the children’s mothers.

      I would rather see the primary focus being on making the absent fathers pay their fair share, rather than victimising, as you seem to do, the mothers who are “left with the baby” (sorry about the cliche).

    • B 23.2

      “I can’t agree with your view of society and government as treating women as inferior or of lesser value.”

      Lindsay I think this very revealing comment must be why you cannot understand the importance of having the DPB. Can you imagine a world in which men have primary responsibility for raising children? Do you really think they would be demonized and forced to struggle on a pitiful income while women abandoned them and their children without fear of being judged or held accountable by society?

  24. Di 24

    Lindsay-“Did you have anything to offer about the level of dependence in terms of duration of stay or how society has benefited from the DPB?

    Lindsay: Here are 2 examples from my own family which illustrate that the DPB has benefited society by allowing children to live with a parent.

    My grandmother left an abusive marriage and my father (aged 2) and his brother spent 9 years in a children’s home while my grandmother supported herself as a cook and visited the boys on weekends. My great uncle’s wife died suddenly leaving 3 young girls who had to be put into an orphanage because he had to work and did not earn enough to pay for a carer for the girls.
    Both of these were in pre DPB days.

    • prism 24.1

      In past years, I know of a case where a wife died leaving a number of children from very young to older. The father was unprepared for this lone responsibility, had a breakdown and the social welfare took over and split up the family. They were rigid in those days, knew best being, in their eyes, superior, moral people – probably still are sometimes. All parents, at different income levels, may need help and part of the infrastructure of a country should be to support the future generation and their parents.

      A socially responsible country would ensure that young mothers and their children were given education to assist them in life. It is a wonderful chance for young women who can’t handle school subjects to get levels of certification covering parenting, financial management etc and be clued up about their job of parenthood. Also help to work on their plans for the future.
      They could be part of a group studying together, with a bus that did a circuit picking them and their babies up in the morning and returning them home in the afternoon with time for food shopping etc. twice a week. We are so mean-minded, narrow and uninterested in parents and children in NZ that ideas like that would be regarded as coddling the young people instead of pro-actively guiding them to a positive self-managing future.

  25. Lindsay 25

    Toad,

    The significant child support problem is only a spin-off from the DPB system. If there was no long term DPB, which acts as an incentive to single parenthood, there would be nowhere near the current number of liable parents – 130,000. The state has effectively replaced many fathers who are nevertheless expected to pay the bills for children they often have no role in raising.

    As a general rule fathers should take responsibility for their children but the state has to stop skewing the morality of this by putting up cash rewards to prospective single mothers. We can’t have it both ways.

    Before the DPB it was difficult for mothers to chase maintenance through the court system and fathers ran the risk of conviction and imprisonment for reneging on a court order. But that was forty years ago. Today, avoiding becoming pregnant and giving birth is much simpler. And in respect of relationship breakdowns, women, who now make up half of the workforce, are much better equipped to handle being a breadwinner and men are much better equipped for sharing parenting.

    Di, They are very sad stories. But I am not advocating a return to no assistance at all. Before the DPB, but not as early as your exampes occur, there was the emergency benefit (from 1968 – 73 specifically called the DPB emergency benefit) which would have been granted to someone in your grandmother’s situation. There was also a Deserted Wives benefit, although that wouldn’t have helped your grandmother. But people have this misapprehension that there was no assistance whatsoever pre-DPB and that isn’t so. Again, my problem is with the long-term alternative to either working or being supported by a partner.

    • B 25.1

      “cash rewards”? really?

      gee here was me thinking the dpb paid less than the cost of living. Guess it must have been my crappy budgeting skills that left me with a $40 per week deficit after rent power phone and food when I was on the dpb.

      • QoT 25.1.1

        Well, B, if they paid you enough to actually cover the costs of survival then you wouldn’t be incentivised into work, obviously! And anyway, malnutrition builds character.

        Why, if you could afford accommodation and food and electricity then you can understand why Poor Foolish Young Girls would be lining up to live off the state’s largesse.

        [Apologies to all for semi-tipsy high drama; I really just cannot connect rationally with “lifestyle choice” “everyone knows how to get contraception and it works 100% so only filthy sluts get knocked up” rhetoric.]

  26. Darel 26

    @434pm I was thinking of Adoption and Its Alternatives (September 2000) Law Commission

    “The Destitute Persons Act 1910 and the Domestic Proceedings Act 1968 created a statutory means by which a woman could seek a maintenance order against the father of her children. The court could, at its discretion, set the rate that it thought appropriate for the father to pay the mother in respect of the child. This maintenance continued until the child reached the age of sixteen; maintenance would continue to be payable in respect of a child over the age of sixteen if the child was engaged in full-time education.

    These statutes provided a means by which women could seek maintenance from the putative father but where there were difficulties women had to resort to the court in order to enforce the maintenance agreement or order. There were further difficulties; an unmarried mother had to obtain an acknowledgement of paternity from the father or a declaration of paternity from the court in order to be entitled to seek maintenance. The Domestic Purposes Benefit (DPB), introduced in statutory form in 1973, mitigated these difficulties. The Act provided State financial support for single mothers, irrespective of whether the father was contributing to maintenance payments”.

  27. Darel 27

    @Lindsay You say that “In low socio-economic communities having babies and going on welfare is not an uncommon event’. The fact that poor people access income-related benefits is the system working, not failing.

    You assert that women add children while on the dpb as a lifestyle choice. I don’t doubt that. My point is that is marginal behaviour. Can you provide links to sources that quantify this behaviour?

    I had a look at one Bob Gregory paper that seemed likely to be a source. http://econrsss.anu.edu.au/Staff/gregory/pdf/National%20Institute%20Lecture.pdf?

    Bob is interested in people recycling into benefits. He thinks that recycling is evidence of people trying to change their welfare status. In other words, people in general don’t accept the dpb as a lifestyle and want to change it. Sure, there is a lot of failure and that is a good place to focus public policy responses because if he’s right, and people do want to stay off the benefit, then increasing the lengths of the periods off the benefit is a good thing for all concerned.

    Bob is less convinced about the efficacy of education in general: “general increases in education have been relatively unimportant in increasing the number of full-time jobs or reducing the growth of welfare dependency’.

    There may be some technical differences between the Australian and NZ systems which might produce different rates but the general outcomes are probably similar and appear intuitive. It was worth reading.

    From 1996 2006 the proportion of the working age population receiving the dpb declined steadily from 5% to 4%. The importance of that time frame is that it includes the 1998 recession. The last two years have seen an increase from about 3.75% to just over 4%. I would think this a reaction to losing jobs rather than a lifestyle choice.

    You say “DPB . . acts as an incentive to single parenthood’. Intuitively, yes, by definition making payments based on any status is an incentive. The big question is what proportion of people on the dpb because they chose the dpb as their source of income in life. Can you point to any research that answers this question?

    How many big do you think effect will be of introducing a work test when the youngest child turns six on encouraging people on the dpb to make sure their youngest child is never older than six?

    You said “the state has to stop skewing the morality of this by putting up cash rewards to prospective single mothers’. Again, I can easily accept some people take up the “cash reward’ but how many is the question. Don’t you think using the term “cash reward’ is pejorative?

    What do you think has been the result of the dpb? Your initial statement was “I am not sure what great improvement it delivered. Fewer violent relationships? More secure and productive adults? Less juvenile crime (one of the reasons the DPB was introduced was to allow mothers of wayward kids to stay at home)? Greater freedom and choice for mothers?’. Do you have any sources that talk about what has happened?

    That Law Com report is here: http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/UploadFiles/Publications/Publication_72_144_R65.pdf

    • B 27.1

      Great post but again “cash reward” and “incentive” the dpb is not, as anyone who has been on it will tell you. The vast majority of women, whether they are teenagers, married women thinking of leaving their husbands, or even women living with a violent partner, were financially better off before going on the dpb. Especially in the case of teenagers as they do not have children yet so only need to support themselves. Even with a minimum wage job (or just staying at home w mum & dad) they are far better off than recieving the dpb and having to support a child. I’m wondering if the point Lindsay (and Bennett) is trying to make is that women on the dpb are actually extremely lazy and the “incentive” is actually that they get to not work. Even if it means struggling financially on the benefit they don’t care because their sole mission in life is to sit around on their ass all day. Yes, that is truly living the dream. (especially since raising children is so incredibly easy)

  28. Lindsay 28

    Darel,

    Each year around 5,000 babies are added to a benefit that has been in place for 10 months or longer. The last time I asked the question 23 percent of people on the DPB had added children to their benefit. My source is the OIA. I am happy to copy responses to you.

    The rate of teenagers going on the DPB remains reasonably constant (with a slight rise with the recent rise in teenage fertility rate) despite economic conditions.

    Thanks for the Law Report. I agreed earlier with you that this was one of the reasons for introducing the DPB. Unfortunately in absolving the father from severe penalty for non-support we know have around 130,000 liable parents. 60,000 pay the bare minimum of just over $2 a day. (Again my source is OIA request to IRD) When the entire DPB bill is considered (incl accommodation supplement, family tax credits etc) fathers are only paying about 7 Percent.

    There is US and European research that show a link between the level of welfare payment and the incidence of single parenthood. I will look it up and post later. I rely on international research because NZ has none of this type.

  29. prism 29

    There is no doubt that baby production is inefficient with poor outcomes at times. Perhaps we should bring military efficiency to bear on it. Or we should read and learn from the book written by Aldous Huxley about producing babies in optimum conditions.
    At school youngsters should be trained firstly in the responsibilities of their sexuality because uncontrolled it can have such disastrous consequences and then the 3 R’s, then all the other stuff.
    Possibly a mix of the above approaches would help. But it’s unpleasant to have someone with a male bean-counter’s mind looking at the DPB situation as a money and people management, like a dairy farmer looking at optimum treatment for his herd.

    I

  30. mcflock 30

    Seems to have been a bit of a logical disjunct there – Darel asked if Lindsay had any data on the sea of incentivised DPB baby factories, we get in response “Each year around 5,000 babies are added to a benefit that has been in place for 10 months or longer”.

    So, Lindsay, is the birthrate for people on a benefit 10 months or longer higher or lower than the general population? Is any difference between the two rates larger than the margin for error?

    Or, when you realised you have no idea (beyond your own prejudices) as to the actual levels of benefit abuse by wilful procreation, did you just factory-reset to “problem has big numbers, must be bad”?

  31. Bill 31

    Beneficiaries ( and many others) are victims of government insofar as government condones and seeks to merely manage systems rank with discriminations flowing from racism, patriarchy and capitalism.

    Some women on the DPB are on the receiving end of the the whole gamut of systemic discriminations present in society. And, not surprisingly, that fucks many of them up quite a lot.

    They can come to see their situation as one of zero prospects and wind up with zero self esteem…and wind up chasing a sense of worth based on satisfying the expectations of the males around them. And those expectations are often pretty fucked up and selfish because they too are on the receiving end of a whole heap of systemic prejudice and disadvantage. Their one advantage is that they have one final layer of society they can exercise power over; one final layer of society to pass the parcel of exploitation on to…women.

    That NZ voted for a government that looks to not just wash it’s hands of its share of responsibility for blighted lives but whip up prejudice against those people is deeply sad and utterly reprehensible.

    The long and short of it is that governments generally expect thanks for offering crutches to the people whose legs it has broken. But Nact are only bringing crutches along to pass to each other for a turn at poking and prodding.

  32. Olwyn 32

    Well said Bill. This from John Minto’s blog; “I would be happy for the dole to be abolished altogether provided there was the guarantee of a decent job for everyone giving a decent standard of living based on 40 hours work.”

    If the NZ working class had the means and stability to build lives, that is what they would mostly do, because that is what most people want to do. Hence there would be less people on benefits – less solo mums, less useless dads, because they would all have an achievable mission in life, as opposed to rolling with the punches all the time.

    People need (1) A living wage, (2) Stable housing, (3) A genuine say in what happens to them.

    • Bill 32.1

      And we know that your number (3) will not simply ‘come about’ because Social Democracies and the financial agendas the governments of Social Democracies necessarily serve, utterly depend on no genuine say being present.

      And we know that they justifiably fear such a demand being made and gaining traction because they cannot deliver such a thing and hang on to their power.

      As such, your number (3) will only ever have a chance of becoming reality via revolution. Even then, nothing is guaranteed because revolutions have a habit of being captured and degenerating to the level of sick caricatures or ridiculous parodies of what it was that went before.

      Genuine community based initiatives that do not depend on government funding and that do not operate within specific political, cultural or religious confines might be the solution. And it’s all possible from the moment that we decide we want it and decide that it is we who are going to put it in place and develop it.

      Until then…

  33. Until then

    …take a ticket and stand in line.

  34. Jenny 34

    “supporting people, into work’.Paula Bennet, (with added punctuation).

    Some people on this thread have questioned Paula Bennet’s claim that her scheme will deliver support;

    Well let me correct all you cynical doubters out there. The following link explains how Bennet’s job search scheme for the unemployed will provide practical support, at a time when thousands are being laid off.

    http://www.viruscomix.com/page413.html

    Employer comment:

    “Excellent”, Mr Burns

    “Works for me”, Scrooge McDuck

    “No, no. Not cruel enough” Walmart spokesperson. (by email)

  35. Darel 35

    Lindsay

    I would be very pleased to receive the OIAs you’ve asked or maybe you could post them on your site?

    If around 5,000 babies are born to people on the dpb each year then that’s about 5% each year. What proportion of those do we think are doing it for a lifestyle choice?

    You say about a quarter of all dpb beneficiaries have added a child while on the benefit. So if having another child is equated with a lifestyler, presumably to prolong the benefit, then only a quarter are lifestylers.

    I’m not surprised that there is a positive relationship between the level of welfare payment and the incidence of single parenthood, up to a point. I imagine that pre-dpb many, poorer women in abusive relationships couldn’t afford to leave their partner and raise the child. The fact of more single parent families might be a positive outcome of the dpb. When I’ve read on this aspect its clear that two loving parents are better than one loving parent but it’s the loving part that matters.

    I had some other questions in my last post that I wouldn’t mind a lead on papers you’ve read or research you’ve done.

    I’m really interested in finding out what proportion of people on the dpb are lifestylers, my hunch remains that its a small proportion but the evidence will tell.

    I’m not convinced that having more children is a great proxy for lifestylers but I’ll agree it’s a reasonable group to start an investigation.

    The view you’ve published is that introducing a work test when the youngest child turns six will encourage people on the dpb to make sure their youngest child is never older than six.

    If I accept that as the likely response from people on the dpb, or a significant proportion of them, then the current behaviour should be about having children as quickly as you can to get to the desirable level of benefit. And then there should be a long delay before more children are produced to prolong the time on the benefit. That’s pretty crudely put, but I’d expect to see two peaks of birth activity. If you got raw data through OIAs so we might be able to start testing for this kind of pattern.

    Very interesting.

  36. Lindsay 36

    I think there is a subtle difference between making an active decision and simply not avoiding something. But they are still behavioural responses. Some research surveys low socio-economic young women and asks whether having a child would change their circumstances for the worse and only a minority agree. Hence they don’t avoid putting themselves into a situation whereby they are dependent on welfare. That’s how I define ‘lifetsyle’ choices. Labour also used the term in its Pathways to Opportunity reforms 2001.

    For academic work on the link between increased welfare payments and the incidence of single parenthood (in Europe), Libertad Gonzales is a good source.

    And then a book I refer to regularly, The End of Welfare by Michael Tanner, has many references to studies into the link (US). It is available on the net, but unfortunately many of the papers it cites are not.

    http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=h1Yx1Zth2LIC&printsec=frontcover&dq=end+of+welfare&source=bl&ots=neVN5pJElA&sig=DcA4bG1H8uzS9x3fcbVYuO-F5qU&hl=en&ei=ZGeuS_SJJZLetgOBy536Cw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CBQQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=&f=false

    Why don’t you send me an e-mail re the OIA stuff;

    dandl.mitchell@clear.net.nz

  37. The view you’ve published is that introducing a work test when the youngest child turns six will encourage people on the dpb to make sure their youngest child is never older than six.

    Bennett told the Star-Times that beneficiaries would not be forced to move to places where more jobs were available.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/3517481/Solo-mum-racks-up-36-years-on-benefit

    In which case, as their child approaches 6 (but more like 5 so they can get settled before school starts), i’d imagine there’ll be a few who move to a place of high unemployment or low employment opportunities where the cost involved in getting work outweigh the benefits of working .

    “People’s reasons for living where they do are many and varied and I am hesitant to make an assumption that people live where they do to avoid work.” – Basher Benny

    oh bullshit. she basically just unhesitantly stated her assumption so I bet she’s has got a way to stop that from happening.

    But how does that go ?…denying families the opportunity to escape from an urban ghetto by legislating to restrict their movements ?…if theres no jobs in the city, you cant afford to go out or get high, the rent is too much and the education sucks why not move to the country…sheeeeeit as long as you got internet you’re sweet

    I mean, what greater lifestyle choice can be made than to move to the country and stay on the benny ?

    • Bill 37.1

      I’m guessing the WINZ rules that stopped people on the benefits moving to where they preferred to live are still in force? eg If you were unemployed and moved to the West Coast you would be declined a benefit.

      • pollywog 37.1.1

        Really ?… That’s gotta contravene some human rights type of shit. At least in the country you got a better chance of making ends meet growing and hunting your own food, especially if theres no jobs in the city and you can get casual seasonal work in the boonies.

        I could never understand why people stayed in ghettoes in NZ when they didnt have to. When working social services in Sth Aux i was amazed that people had never been outside the city and didn’t know any better.

        As soon as shit took a turn for the worse and i could see us spiraling down, i got us the fuck outta there.

        • Bill 37.1.1.1

          I think the rationale went along the lines of you were not actively seeking employment and/or that you were not making yourself available for paid employment….there being no job opportunities in the area you were moving to.

  38. Darel 38

    Lindsay

    I’m still no closer to understanding what proportion of women on the dpb are lifestylers but whatever criteria you use.

    Of course many poor women will agree that having a child will not make them worse off. I’d imagine that most women and men would agree, say between 20 and 40.

    Poor people agreeing that you wont be worse off by having child is not the same thing as saying women on the dpb are choosing that approach to life, or even letting it happen. Unless that is what you are saying. Are you saying that all poor women on the dpb, or at least a significant proportion, by definition, are lifestyling?

    Lindsay, what do you think about the other responses I’ve made in earlier posts? I imagine you’ve actually got a clear definition of what you mean by lifestylers and I’m interested to hear it. I imagine you don’t care about some of the abusive sorts that lurk around so you might as well share it and be damned.

    In tertiary education we talk about a certain group of mainly poor women who access hairdressing education through which they learn good generic skills (literacy, numeracy, customer service, business management). They do that because they can visualise themselves being a hairdresser (plus a few other types of jobs). So when it comes to public policy we might take the view that although the number of people being trained to be a hairdresser well exceeds the jobs, the positive externalities are very high so we might be more relaxed about this education. Of course we’d prefer that people had a boarder view of their possibilities and took a more direct route to get there, but in the short term, if hairdressing education is one of the few ways of getting some people better education, then let’s do that. It’s pretty hard for a society to be too educated, and there are good benefits to raising the lowest level up a notch, so there is a good argument for a bit of fuzziness in this policy example.

    I look forward to your response.

  39. 6 of the 10 girls my eldest daughter came though kura kaupapa with had babies either while still at school or within one year after it…dont know if it was a lifestyle choice but it was certainly easier than getting a shit job which was all they were qualified for.

    None have gone on to tertiary education yet although it is an option my daughter is holding out for since she and another were the only ones who qualified to. It’s just a case of simple economics as to when.

    It’s also just a simple case of economics to be a mother and get pretty much the same as what they’d get working while still feeling they are valued and needed, if only by their children. It’s not a choice i allowed my daughter to entertain though. One thing she doesnt have is a self esteem problem and the need to feel validated by doing what women are created to do, at least not at such an early age.

    Ideally, in older times the young mothers kids were handed over to the older village mothers within the tribe to be raised while they did the tasks of growing and gathering food. Marriages were arranged and children born out of wedlock to other men from outside their tribe had the right to journey to their lands as part of a quest of knowing and were to be welcomed when they got there.

    It really did take a village to raise a child, only now there’s barely any villages left and the state, in taking over governance and sovereignty have bred a welfare dependent state of mind that has changed native pasifikan culture for the worse.

    • B 39.1

      I still do not agree that the DPB is any kind of incentive. Even a ‘shit job’ pays more than the dpb once you take the cost of raising a child into account. It’s not ‘easier’ to raise children than to work full time either.

      However, you make a good point when you say that these girls feel valued and needed in their role as a mother. To feel valued and secure in the society we live in is something we all want and need, and for many people gender, ethnicity, class or all three play a huge part in how much they are valued by society. It is the people who are most valued by society (white, middle & upper class) who are least likely to become teenage mothers. These privileged young women are not only given every opportunity to succeed, they have grown up with the message society sends that women like them can and do succeed. In other words they have many options for a meaningful life other than having children.

      Addressing these kinds of underlying causes is what the government would focus on if they really wanted to reduce numbers of young mothers on the DPB.

    • Bill 39.2

      ‘older times’?

      Not that long ago, and not just in Pasifika culture.

      Way after enclosure, in my parents’ generation, ( European working class) the extended family and community took a lot more to do with child rearing than would seem imaginable today.

      I guess we, they or whoever gave it all away (governance) in pursuit of non-slum housing, flushing toilets and washing machines…

      Different beginnings, same bum deal, same endings.

      • pollywog 39.2.1

        tru dat Bill…

        My palagi father got lumped with 5 kids on the dpb after mum died young and the only thing that saved us from being put into state care was, we lived in a small town with family support from his sisters and mother so we couldn’t really get into that much trouble, but damn there were some close calls. Though still damaged, it didnt kill us and made us stronger as adults, more determined to get off the welfare cycle and live outside the stereotype. None of us have been to jail and none is on the dole.

        But anyway, i’ll be keen to see what ‘whanau ora’ is all about and it pisses me off not to hear cashed up iwi making a big noise about looking after their most vulnerable and weakest rather than the latest property they’ve developed or negotiation bonus the most privileged and strongest have awarded themselves.

  40. Even a ‘shit job’ pays more than the dpb once you take the cost of raising a child into account. It’s not ‘easier’ to raise children than to work full time either.

    …working with a child doesn’t pay more though, so it’s the soft option if it means you dont have to work at all, and it’s easier to take the money, neglect the child and pawn it off to the grandparents, than it is to work full time also. At least you can still party like you dont have to get up for work any day of the week.

    I don’t think poor young pasifikan women and men really understand that, its not enough to love and feed and clothe them as best as possible, that having a child does not neccessarily make you a grown up adult or that being a solo parent inhibits your chances for securing a meaningful partner.

    Theres a hell of a lot more to successfully ‘raising’ a child than they could possibly know and that’s where we need to educate them before they decide to have children. Sadly though, it seems it’s every ethinicity and class out for themselves with the ruling class being traditionally WASPish and skewing policy to favour their own ‘tribe’…

    • B 40.1

      Sorry to be pedantic but actually a minimum wage job full time does normally pay a bit more as you get working for families tax credits and accomodation supplement etc. However it is a lot harder to work as well as raising your children.

      The point I was trying to make though is that teenage girls don’t have children in the first place to get the dbp. Maybe there’s a case that its easier to stay on it once you already have kids but the whole “breeding for business” argument is in my opinion completely nuts. Having a baby is incredibly scary and traumatic for a teenager and the life of a dpb mum is not something she would purposely choose. In fact I think the way comments like this are thrown around by (mostly male) politicians and commentators is disgusting and perverted.

      • pollywog 40.1.1

        Having a baby is incredibly scary and traumatic for a teenager and the life of a dpb mum is not something she would purposely choose. In fact I think the way comments like this are thrown around by (mostly male) politicians and commentators is disgusting and perverted.

        eh ?..disgusting and perverted ?

        I’m not saying young women deliberately get pregnant to go on the benny but if they’re not educated and don’t take precautions then do get pregnant… it shouldn’t come as a surprise that the only other choice is abortion, which i would imagine is far more scary and traumatic than having the baby.

        So in choosing not to terminate they are deliberately purposely consigning themeselves to a life on the dpb especially if the father is not in a stable relationship with her and initially opts for termination or the child was the result of a one night stand.

        By and large, teenagers aren’t generally known for making wise choices. If they think they’re a failure at most things without even trying, the rationale is at least they can be a good mother.

        • B 40.1.1.1

          “By and large, teenagers aren’t generally known for making wise choices. If they think they’re a failure at most things without even trying, the rationale is at least they can be a good mother.”

          Yes I agree

          My disgusting & perverted comment wasn’t aimed at your comment it was aimed at those people who do imply that teenagers deliberately get pregnant to go on the dpb – John Key (breeding for business) and Garth George among others. They seem to be suggesting that these teenagers are going out and sleeping with random guys in order to get pregnant and collect the wonderful cash reward that is the dpb. (in other words prostituting themselves for money). I just find that really offensive considering the emotional turmoil and hardship these girls go through as teen mums. To me there is something disgusting about an adult man labelling girls who are little more than children as bimbos out for the cash.

  41. Jum 41

    I think we owe a vote of thanks to The Standard for putting up this thread and Lindsay Mitchell for attempting to one-woman-band answer the many posters’ comments.

    This issue has never had such a worthy airing. Media coverage has been judgmental about DPB women not staying married. In the 90s the Herald displayed a whole page interview with some visiting American conservative who attacked our women on the DPB and what should be done to them.

    Luckily, some good ideas like the crèches for returning mothers to education have given some self worth back to mums.

    DPB’s worst critics are often other women. I’ve never got that. It leaves these DPB women totally alone and defenceless which makes them the ideal sport for right-wing politicians and even left-wing conservatives. Let’s not forget some of the men keen to get rid of Helen Clark, just because she was a woman, weren’t all from the right. They voted for National in 2008 which had a youngish rich white male brought in and groomed to stroke their prejudices.

    But, the most UNFORGIVABLE crime conservative governments commit is when the children, having been force-fed how useless their mother is at keeping a husband/partner and not looking like a fashion model and not dashing out to work for the few hours she actually has time to herself and forgetting that she is father and mother 24/7, begin to attack her.

    They begin to ignore her instructions and rules because she has no power in society and therefore no authority with them. Boys are always the hardest to handle because they are told that women are not as important as men and a separated father may exploit that.

    Many daughters will become pregnant because no one expects anything else of them. In fact many men think that’s all women should be doing, but it has to be under a man’s control. That is the crux of the matter with male and female conservatives.

  42. Jum 42

    part 2

    Having thanked Lindsay Mitchell for staying the course I still take her to task for having a closed mind to anything but the rightwing view of women and how she can state that society and government does not treat women as inferior or of lesser value takes my breath away. Business is society and they apply some of the most draconian inequities to women not just that of unequal pay for work of equal value. Pay Equity thrown out is government instigated.

    No Lindsay. No converts for you today.

  43. Jum 43

    Boys are always the hardest to handle

    should read Boys are often the hardest to handle.

    • RedLogix 43.1

      Jum,

      I agree, a great thread I’ve only just had time to read… congrats to both sides for maintaining a sane and interesting debate.

      I do have a genuine question, one that is sincerely not intended to be provocative. In debates like this there we tend to resort very often to the short-hand notion of ‘society’. For instance you write above, They begin to ignore her instructions and rules because she has no power in society and therefore no authority with them. (I agree incidentally, but this is beside my point.).

      But this seems to neglect the fact that 50% of ‘society’ are other women. Moreover in my humble experience of life, the harshest critics of women are in fact… other women. From my poor old male perspective I have nothing but admiration for women, who despite a total lack of useful support from the feckless males in their lives, press ahead with the monumental task of raising children.

      Yet it is other women who will dish out the hurtful gossip and snide comments to those who they perceive as having stepped outside the acceptable boundaries. (And men do this to each other as well so it’s not like one gender has a monopoly on this behaviour.) I guess my point is this, that simply blaming ‘society’s’ treatment of single mothers on the ‘patriarchy’ seems to me a simplistic and uni-dimensional. There must be more to it than this.

      • prism 43.1.1

        From my observations RL women often prefer to fall in with the dominant line in society which often reflects a male attitude. There is more kudos in pointing the finger at ‘those’ people who offend some established behaviour. This gives an automatic hoist to the speaker up the social ladder, to an elevated position that can be improved on. Women on the lower rungs may have trouble shifting or even fall further and become pariahs in decent society.
        Women in general are dependent on being well thought of for their position in society. Not for most of them to bulldoze through taking an unpopular view. Also it is generally not done to be aggressive, but strong-minded women often practise passive aggression and that can involve much fault-finding or worse and not much generosity of spirit to women deemed of lesser status.

      • Jum 43.1.2

        I did explain in the earlier post that I felt women were certainly the worst critics of women on DPB.

        But, an underlying idea I have is that often women will criticize/judge other women in order to escape attention and perhaps censure and gain favour with male colleagues, family, male friends, etc.in social gatherings. They will subdue the bile and smile sweetly, because that’s what they’ve been trained to do. This is not an equal society. That’s why this government got away with telling women they are not worth equal pay and all they got was a telling off from the women’s groups – pathetic.

        That is why many of them chose Key over Clark, even though she was by far the better leader by a thousand per cent. They’ve been trained to believe that women are incapable of being leaders. It’s time women realized that the days of being independent, making their own decisions and being responsible for their own decisions instead of everyone else’s are here. Why on earth would they still want to take responsibility but none of the power? I don’t get it either.

        Religion should be shot. I know it brings many people solace and a something or other they can tell their troubles to, but the price that women have to pay is to be subservient to it. Even men have to play a role they may not want to. Religion is a deeply flawed model and its major aim has, is and always will be to encapsulate women in a subsidiary role to men.

        Sorry Red Logix but the dynamics between men and women in our current society always end with women coming off second best. Patriarchy is the game and if you don’t play the game you will be sent off the field along with all those other DPBs, unemployed maladjusted and I’m sure you get the gist. Women fear reprisals, like they fear rape and that’s what keeps them under control and until they join together to protect one another it won’t change. This government knows that and actively works to keep it that way.

      • B 43.1.3

        Agree 100% with Jum’s comment esp regarding religion – Even though most people in NZ society are not religious, our history is firmly grounded in Christianity and everything that goes with it. Society’s moral values were originally based on Christianity and still survive to this day. So women are still expected to serve men in many ways even though religion itself is dying out. If it is the social norm to be a certain way then most people will fit in with that behaviour even if it disadvantages them.

  44. RedLogix 44

    Benebasher Bennett’s “kick’em of the week” is here.

    Just another of a very clear pattern of ‘releases’ intended to discredit the welfare system. We’ve been getting these directly from Bennett’s office about once every few weeks in what must be a deliberately planned policy.

    Of course every large system has a small minority of extreme cases at the margin, and an even smaller number of rorters and ripoffs. Bennett’s office knows this perfectly well and is exploiting them in a systematic, cynical fashion in order to influence public opinion against the majority of beneficiaries.

    There can be only one reason for this; to set the ground-work for a major assault on the welfare system.

  45. B 45

    Ironic when you think of all the wealthy people tax dodging, some of whom must have ripped the govt for millions. Where’s the press releases on them?

  46. Darel 46

    Lindsay was kind enough to send me some OIA data she has collected.

    At this point of discussion I still don’t know what people mean by lifestylers or approximately what proportion of dpb recipients they constitute.

    It seems we should know what the nature and scope of the problem is before rushing into changing policy.

  47. Jum 47

    B you will find that the societal take on women is much the same as the media take on tax dodges.

    Power controls the powerless.

    spam word: worker

  48. Lindsay 48

    Jum

    I have a very deep commitment to the belief that as well-intentioned as it was, the unexpected consequences of the DPB trump whatever problems it was trying to solve. Politics (although I stood twice as an ACT candidate) now leaves me cold. Thanks for the acknowledgement. Our fundamental difference lies in what role the state should play in private life.

    Red Logix

    National is trying to soft soap the electorate for reform through highlighting ‘outrageous’ abuse. It’s an easy but dishonest approach and hurts beneficiaries across the board. It shouldn’t substitute for some rigorous analysis and appraisal of the current extent of dependency. NZ hasn’t conducted the kind of research that other western nations have in this arena.

    Pollywog, Thank you for fleshing out what I see amongst communities I’ve worked in and can’t write about freely. Pakeha to some extent have doubly shafted Maori. Having said that, practising victimhood is a waste of time and lives. I am glad your daughter’s psyche is strong. No doubt a reflection of your own. If you think I am patronising – maybe I am and can’t see it myself.

    • pollywog 48.1

      S’all good Lindsay. I don’t understand why you can’t write about it freely though and no i don’t think you’re being patronising.

      I think my daughter has an equal opportunist view of childcare/parenting cos i did the solo dad thing and got them out of sth aux when their mum was in a bad headspace and made some not so healthy choices on their behalf, so i got a lawyer and custody.

      Even now, it was more beneficial for my current lady to work towards a career while i stay home and do the full time childcare/housecare thing rather than me chasing work overseas or out of town. Financially we’ve taken a bit of a hit but the kids are in better shape for it i reckon.

      And now that i’ve got a bit of time on my hands which i have to juggle around our youngest 2 yr old i’m thinking of getting back into voluntary community work.

    • B 48.2

      Lindsay thanks for sharing yr views. From reading your posts your argument regarding the dpb seems to be

      1) a lot of people are on it- more than before- some for a long time
      2)society has not benefited from it
      3)many teenagers from low socioeconomic backgrounds go on it as a lifestyle choice
      4)It has unintended consequences: the state has replaced fathers with the dpb which encourages women to leave relationships by offering the cash reward of dpb
      5)male ‘hangers on’ increasing violence to dpb mums.
      6)It is now easier for women to work and men to share parenting so there is no need for dpb

      ok heres my take-

      1)society has changed in past 30 odd years – divorce and single parenthood is now (more)socially accepted. I think this would explain the larger numbers on it. Some are on it for a long time, yes perhaps they need it.
      2)with the increase in numbers of sole parents it could be argued that the dpb has averted a huge social problem – massive poverty leading to crime etc
      3)I think I already answered this one pretty thoroughly earlier in the thread
      4)Ditto (NOT cash reward)
      5)before the dpb women did not have the choice to leave violence -now they do (including leaving the hangers on)
      6)Not all men stick around to share the parenting and working full time while raising children puts undue hardship on both mother and children. Children have the right to be looked after by their parent – not stuck in childcare everyday after school and during holidays.

  49. Jum 49

    Lindsay,
    No prob. The reason we will never agree on what role the state should play in private life is because of my total distrust of the male control in the market place which Act worships and the ongoing governments that condone the outcomes for women. That’s why we need the DPB in spite of a few women/men (it usually involves men somewhere along the line!) corrupting its umbrella philosophy.

    But if you look at society in general, the most powerful are women, but they are still in disarray. Men are afraid of that power but women are more so in what may manifest if all the gloves come off. At the heart of it, women are still choosing to protect their children by not pushing the boundaries.

    There has been the rare occasion: we did see an example of women taking action in Ireland with the peace march, which caused a slight shift in thinking. The history of Ireland is of extreme violence; these women risked their lives.

    However, in this present climate, the children are actually being seen/proved to be not protected – catholic church abuse uncovered, a women being killed once a fortnight. according to some statistics with the associated family abuse, the global misuse of children in rape, in war, in slavery, the Congo atrocities, babies being raped to cure Aids and it must be tens of thousands or millions of women being trafficked, then I believe the powers that be should start to be concerned for their positions.

    Even women will finally understand that in making themselves invisible to power, they have become expendable and the future of their children’s children at risk.

    It’s called eve-lution and the seeds are right here, right now.

  50. Darel 50

    Paula Bennett’s “shake up’ of those using welfare “as a lifestyle choice’ means we need to know who this group is. The Minister cites one example regarding the dpb a saving of $200m over 10 years if 5% of sole parents with a youngest child aged over six exit the dpb. (Susan St John has pointed out the maximum saving is $30m. While a fiscal saving is nice the policy doesn’t need it to be worthwhile. Better accuracy would be nice though).

    So maybe 5% is the proportion the Minister has in mind. It’s a figure I would find reasonable as a starting point just on the assumption that 5%, even cabinet ministers, have been proven to over-respond to incentive payments.

    If it is only 5% that are being targeted then this policy will affect a lot of people it isn’t intended to. Also $5.5m in staff time, IT and resources will be spent on the Future Focus programme.
    http://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/work-programmes/initiatives/future-focus/index.html

    I would want to be a little clearer about targeting before coming up with a policy response. But I am skeptical about the ability to find systematic abuse because otherwise it would have been done and trumpeted.

    Here’s another way into better description. We know the numbers of dpb recipients were declining until the recent economic shock and are still low as a proportion of the population. My hypothesis is that the bulk of people that have just come onto, or back, to the dpb is a reaction to the economic shock rather than a lifestyle choice. I would look at this limited group to discover what makes them different because I think they will be part of providing objective traits of those who are not lifestylers.

    I suspect that most simply lost work rather than spurned low paying work.. Alternatively, the cost of working (eg travel and childcare) outweighed the cost of not working.

    Lindsay, do you have a research programme and is something like this on it?

    Of course, some people who don’t do paid work are still worthy recipients of the dpb so investigating this group isn’t going to do all the heavy definitional lifting.

    What I don’t see is evidence for systematic baby rearing in order to stay on the benefit. I’ve described what that might look like in an earlier post.

    John Tamihere used a useful idea of respite vs residence in terms of welfare use on Q+A. It’s not perfect in that some people who “reside’ on welfare are legitimately there as all panelists agreed (mentally ill, etc). But it is a concept that is quite helpful in the case of dpb where there is a lot of churn going onto and off the benefit.

    Much of what the Minister says (eg people that can work should work) has been said by politicians of various hues since the beginning of the welfare state. It’s in the definitions that we’ll see the differences, eg what does “can work’ mean for this Minister?

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Remainers starting to sound like fascists
    As Brexit comes to a grisly conclusion (perhaps) people on all sides are saying intemperate and uwise things.  Some, like the Daly Mail, have been doing it for years.People as normally level headed as Jon Lansman are calling for automatic deselection of MPs who vote against a (likely) Labour three ...
    28 mins ago
  • Labour MPs supporting Johnson’s turd-sandwich deal?
    I find this unbelievable:
    I've got one source saying more Labour MPs than expected are mulling whether to vote for the deal - including names who were not on the letter to Juncker and Tusk— Emilio Casalicchio (@e_casalicchio) 17 October 2019 I've compiled a list of possible reasons why Labour ...
    20 hours ago
  • Why do we need control orders again?
    On Wednesday, the government was loudly telling us that it needed to legislate to allow it to impose "control orders" - effectively a parole regime, but imposed without charge, prosecution, conviction or real evidence - on suspected terrorists because they couldn't be prosecuted for their supposed crimes. Today, it turns ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    22 hours ago
  • Bullshitting the Minister
    On Monday, the Hit and Run inquiry heard from NZDF's former director of special operations, who claimed that the defence Minister knew everything about the Operation Burnham raid. Today, the inquiry heard from that (former) Minister - and it turns out that he didn't know nearly as much as NZDF ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    22 hours ago
  • Speaker: Extinction Rebellion is not a cult (but ecstasy for the people)
    Yoga gurus and cult leaders – I’ve seen a few. Two weeks ago, I unknowingly joined an alleged new-age cult at the Kāpiti coast, together with a giant kraken and some neatly dressed pensioners who would make any book club proud.They were among the two hundred people of all ages ...
    1 day ago
  • We need to bring the police under control
    The last decade has seen a trend of increasing weapons availability to police. Assault rifles. Tasers on every hip. Guns in cars. And following the march 15 massacre, pistols on every hip, all over the country. At the same time, its also seen an increase in the abuse of force: ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • If you can’t measure it, does it exist?
    In the last couple of weeks, I’ve been busy preparing for our summer paper on Science Communication. Looking for something amusing about ‘risk’ in science, I came across this neat xkcd.com cartoon about why so many people come knocking on my door (or phoning me, or emailing me) desperately wanting ...
    SciBlogsBy Marcus Wilson
    1 day ago
  • Swinson’s swithering
    Jo Swinson is doing even worse at this Being Sensible lark that I'd thought.  I've just become aware of the following utterance
    .@KayBurley presses Lib Dem leader @joswinson on whether she would agree to a #Brexit deal 'no matter how bad a deal it is' as long as it had ...
    2 days ago
  • Women’s rights, trans ideology and Gramsci’s morbid symptoms
    by John Edmundson The International Socialist Organisation (ISO) have recently reposted a February article, by Romany Tasker-Poland, explaining ISO’s position in the “trans rights” debate.  It is available on their website and on their Facebook Page.  The article sets out to explain why “socialists support trans rights”.  It reads more ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 days ago
  • We need to take guns off police
    Today's IPCA report of police criminality: a police officer unalwfully tasered a fleeing suspect who posed no threat to anyone:The police watchdog has found an officer unlawfully tasered an Auckland man who broke his ankle jumping off a balcony to escape arrest. [...] To avoid arrest, the man jumped over ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • “Bringing kindness back”
    "Auckland City Mission: 10% of Kiwis experiencing food insecurity", RNZ, 16 October 2019:About half a million people are experiencing food insecurity, according to new research from the Auckland City Mission. Food insecurity, or food poverty, is defined as not having enough appropriate food. The City Mission said over the last ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • Press Release: “Fake News” from Auckland City Council CCOs Board Chairs re pay and performance b...
    Media Statement for Immediate Release 16th October 2019 “Fake News” from Auckland City Council CCOs Board Chairs re pay and performance bonuses for top managers Despite comments from Auckland City Council CCOs Board Chairs re pay and performance bonuses for top managers—Herald Newspaper Tuesday Oct 15th–there is very little evidence ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    2 days ago
  • Ever-So-Slightly Bonkers: Simon Bridges Plays To His Base.
    Would You Buy A Used Propaganda Video From This Man? Bridges and the National Party’s strategists have discovered that the ideas and attitudes considered acceptable by today’s editors and journalists are no longer enforceable. The rise and rise of the Internet and the social media platforms it spawned means that ...
    2 days ago
  • Asking for food
    There is plenty of evidence of the way the business mentality has permeated every level of society since the recrudescence of market liberalism 35 years ago. You only need to think of how citizens in need of help from their government, their state, their country, are now routinely described as ...
    Opposable ThumbBy Unknown
    2 days ago
  • Forty years of change in the jobs Kiwi do and the places they call home
    John MacCormick Over the last 40 years, New Zealanders – and people in other countries – have experienced big changes in the jobs they do and where they live and work. These changes include: a decline in manufacturing jobs an increase in jobs in ‘information-intensive’ industries (which are better paid ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    2 days ago
  • Protecting Fresh Waterways in Aotearoa/NZ: The Strong Public Health Case
    Nick Wilson, Leah Grout, Mereana Wilson, Anja Mizdrak, Phil Shoemack, Michael Baker Protecting waterways has the benefits of: (1) protecting water from hazardous microbes; (2) minimising cancer risk and other problems from nitrates in water; (3) avoiding algal blooms that are hazardous to health; (4) protecting mahinga kai uses (cultural ...
    SciBlogsBy Public Health Expert
    2 days ago
  • Massey University triggered to rebrand
    by The Council of Disobedient Women In a press release today Massey University announced it has decided to rebrand and reorientate after struggling to be a University for grown-ups. For some time the University has wanted to be a safe play space for wee-woke-misogynists who have been really badly triggered ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    3 days ago
  • Swinson backing calls for a second referendum (again)
    After a brief dalliance with 'hard Revoke' it looks like the Lib Dems are changing ground on on Brexit, with leader Jo Swinson reverting to calling for a second referendum on Johnson's deal.The party has tabled an amendment to the Queen’s speech requesting that any deal brought back from Brussels ...
    3 days ago
  • An odious bill
    The government has decided that someone has done Something Bad. But despite their belief, there seems to be no evidence that they have actually broken the law. So the government's solution is to pass a retrospective law allowing them to be punished anyway, on a lower standard of proof. If ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • National is now the party of climate arson
    So, Judith Collins has done a Facebook rant about climate change, peddling the same shit National has been shovelling for the past twenty years: the impacts are overstated, there's no need to do anything about it, and its too hard anyway (oh, and its so unfair that people who peddle ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • The environmental footprint of electric versus fossil car
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz There is a lot of discussion on the benefits of ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    3 days ago
  • “Manifest” by Andrew Bird – A Song For The Times.
    I came across this song quite by accident. If it isn't one of Greta Thunberg's favourites - it should be.Video courtesy of YouTube.This post is exclusive to Bowalley Road. ...
    3 days ago
  • Passing the buck
    Last month, NZDF's shoddy coverup of what it knew about civilian casualties in Operation Burnham began to fall apart, with the revelation that a report on the matter, which NZDF claimed not to have, had been sitting in an NZDF safe for the past nine years. Yesterday, the man responsible ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • India a major player in Earth observation satellites
    While many imagine that countries like the USA and Europe dominate space activities, in fact India is now a major player on this stage. It launches satellites for its own purposes and also commercially, and has constellations orbiting our planet and returning data of vital importance to that nation in ...
    SciBlogsBy Duncan Steel
    4 days ago
  • The rot at the top (2).
    Thanks to a report from the Acting Inspector General of Intelligence and Security following a complaint by Nicky Hager, we have come to find out that the SIS illegally spied on Mr. Hager on behalf of the NZDF after publication of Hager’s 2011 book, Other People’s Wars. The NZDF justified ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    4 days ago
  • Common misconceptions about “Global Warming”
    COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING MYTH 1: Global temperatures are rising at a rapid, unprecedented rate. FACT: The HadCRUT3 surface temperature index, produced by the Hadley Centre of the UK Met Office and the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, shows warming to 1878, cooling to 1911, ...
    An average kiwiBy admin@averagekiwi.com
    4 days ago
  • A climate of tyranny
    For the past week, Extinction Rebellion has been peacefully protesting in London to demand action on climate change. The British government's response? Ban their protests:Police have banned Extinction Rebellion protests from continuing anywhere in London, as they moved in almost without warning to clear protesters who remained at the movement’s ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Collins crushes climate
    An essay by Judith Collins MP reported on Carbon News yesterday seems to show an alarming shift in attitude within the National Party. Collins argues against the Zero Carbon Bill, the Paris Agreement, and downplays the magnitude of climate impacts. The Paris Agreement was adopted in December 2015 and ratified ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert McLachlan
    4 days ago
  • More disappointment
    When they were running for election, Labour promised to overhaul the Employment Relations Act and introduce fair pay agreements to set basic pay and conditions on an industry level, preventing bad employers from undercutting good ones. They followed this up by establishing a working group, which reported back in January ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • What do these mother-child studies really say about fluoridation?
    A list of indicators of bad science – many of these are found in articles promoted by anti-fluoride activists. Anti-fluoride activists have been pouring money into a scaremongering campaign warning pregnant women not to drink fluoridated water. They claim fluoride will lower the IQ of their future child. Fluoride ...
    4 days ago
  • Losing Labour’s Mills-Tone.
    Nothing Left To Say: Labour's pollster, Stephen Mills, remains swaddled-up in the comforting myths of the 1980s. As if the experience of Roger Douglas’s genuinely radical post-Muldoon policy agenda was literally a once-in-a-lifetime thing – as much as the party could possibly absorb for at least the next 50 years.MEMO ...
    4 days ago
  • Speaker: Disability and the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse
    The Royal Commission on abuse in care is very significant for the disability community. For many decades last century, thousands of disabled children, and adults who managed to survive, were locked away from families and communities. This was not for anything they had done, but for the perceived threat their ...
    4 days ago
  • Spain is not a democracy
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • UK Conservatives hate democracy
    With an unfair voting system, uneven electorates and an un-elected upper house, the UK's "democracy" is barely worthy of the name. But now the government wants to make it worse:The government has been accused of suppressing voters’ rights with the potential disenfranchisement of tens of thousands of people after plans ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • What is wrong with our building industry?
    Back in the 90's and early 2000's, the building industry was building leaky homes which should never have been granted consent. Now it turns out they've been building dodgy office blocks as well:New imaging technology has revealed hundreds of major buildings nationwide have defective or missing concrete or reinforcing steel. ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Local bodies
    Local body election results were released over the weekend, to joy or despair depending on where you live. In Auckland, Phil Goff trounced John Tamihere, who is muttering darkly about running for Parliament again (but which party would want him?) Wellington is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Weta Workshop, except ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • A future of government
      How could government evolve over the next decades? Reports of democracy’s imminent demise are greatly exaggerated.  However, satisfaction with political systems in many countries is low, so there is much to do for governments of all political stripes to improve relevance and trust. Digital technologies are seen as one ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert Hickson
    1 week ago
  • Speaker: Catalonia, interrupted
    Two years have now gone by since the Friday afternoon when my university-student son and I headed out of our Barcelona flat to a nearby primary school, designated as a polling station for the vote that was to be held the following Sunday: the referendum on Catalonia’s independence from Spain ...
    1 week ago
  • Sage Decisions Unwisely Over-Ruled.
    Overruled: The joint decision of Finance Minister, Grant Robertson (Labour) and his Associate Minister, David Parker (Labour) arguably the two most powerful ministers in Jacinda Ardern’s government, to grant OceanaGold the consents which Land Information Minister, Eugenie Sage (Greens) had earlier denied them, offers bitter proof of how hard fighting ...
    1 week ago
  • Government may ban voting in effort to get more people to do it
    More than double the number of people who will vote in this year’s local body elections have tried marijuana or urinated somewhere they shouldn’t have. As local elections look set for the lowest turnout in decades, with many regions falling well short of 40%, the Government is exploring a number ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • Woman: Deleted.
    A Statement on Abortion Law Reform by the Council of Disobedient Women   On the eve of bringing an end to antiquated, anti-women abortion laws Green MP Jan Logie intends to write women out of the Bill. With a stroke of the pen, the woke are aiming for total erasure ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • The Hollowest of Men Ride Again… SURPRISE!
    Musings continue apace about “the experienced businessman!” soon to be taking up a National Party MP position. Or to be more accurate, being parachuted into a seat to shut down their former MP Jamie-Lee Ross, who despite his own shortcomings shed at least some more light on the inner workings ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    1 week ago
  • Barbaric
    The Ugandan government wants to murder gay people:Uganda has announced plans to impose the death penalty on homosexuals. The bill, colloquially known as “Kill the Gays” in Uganda, was nullified five years ago on a technicality, but the government said on Thursday it plans to resurrect it within weeks. The ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Fighting Monsters.
    Freedom Of Speech? The Säuberung (cleansing by fire) was the work of the German Student Union which, on 10 May 1933, under the watchful eye of the Nazi Reichminister for Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, consigned 25,000 books to the flames in a ritual exorcism of “un-German thought”. According to the logic of the ...
    1 week ago
  • The next wave of kaupapa Māori politics: its constitutional, it must be.
      “There can be no such thing as kaupapa Māori political parties or politics in Aotearoa” (Willie Jackson, Labour Party (2017). Māori TV, General/List Election Special) I begin with that claim because at the time, I was confounded at first that it fell out of Willie Jackson’s mouth, and then ...
    EllipsisterBy Ellipsister
    1 week ago
  • Night lights of NZ from orbit
    New Zealand has prided itself for decades with regard to its lack of pollution, and all will be aware that the ‘100% Pure New Zealand‘ meme is under threat through land, water and air pollution of various causes. There is another type of contamination that the country also faces: light ...
    SciBlogsBy Duncan Steel
    1 week ago
  • Reporters deliver uplifting news to fleeing Japanese residents: they won’t miss any rugby
    New Zealand’s media is doing its part in Japan, reassuring those in the path of the storm that they won’t miss any rugby while away from their flooded homes. New Zealand sports reporters stationed in Japan for the Rugby World Cup have had the rare and heartwarming opportunity to inform ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • Government in contentious discussions about whether to put surplus on red or black
    Regional Development Minister Shane Jones is the only Cabinet member in favour of putting it all on green. As Finance Minister Grant Robertson finds himself with an enormous $7.5 billion surplus, the Government has begun intense, at times contentious conversations about whether to put the money on red or black at ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • Jordanian teachers’ successful strike has lessons for here
    by Susanne Kemp At the start of September close to 100,000 school teachers went on strike in Jordan.  They demanded a 50% pay rise.  A pay rise actually agreed to by the regime back in 2014. In early October, however, in the face of government repression and threats, the teachers’ ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • Why some people still think climate change isn’t real
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz Why do people still think climate change isn’t real? David ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • The SIS unlawfully spied on Nicky Hager
    Back in 2011, journalist Nicky Hager published Other People's Wars, an expose on NZDF's activities over the previous decade of the "war on terror". NZDF didn't like this, and especially didn't like the fact that it was base don leaks from their own. So, they had the SIS investigate him ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • October 2019 – Newsletter
    https://mailchi.mp/7d9133add053/closing-the-gap-october-2019-newsletter ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    1 week ago
  • And they wonder why we think they’re environmental vandals…
    The Zero Carbon Bill is due back from select committee in two weeks, and will likely pass its final stages in November. So naturally, farmers are planning a hate-march against it. But they're not just demanding lower methane targets so they can keep on destroying the planet; they're also demanding ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Paying the price in California
    Last year, California burned. This year, to stop it happening again (or rather, to stop themselves from being found liable if it happens again), Pacific Gas and Electric is cutting power to half the state for a week:Schools are closed. Traffic lights down. Tunnels dark. Businesses unopened. Hospitals running on ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Let’s Hear It For Up-Close-And-Personal, Hard-Copy Democracy!
    The Best Way: Missing from the on-line voting debate is any reference to the voting system that produces turn-out figures ranging from 77 to 93 percent of registered voters. The voting system used to collect and count the votes cast in our parliamentary elections. The system that involves citizens making ...
    1 week ago
  • 10/10: World Day Against the Death Penalty
    Today, October 10, is the world day against the death penalty. Out of 195 UN member states, 84 still permit capital punishment. Today is the day we work to change that. This year's theme is children. Having a parent sentenced to death or executed causes long-term trauma and stigmatization which ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Talking Freer Lives: a Marxist gender-critical perspective from Australia
    Among the great new bunch of political friends we have been making recently is the excellent Australian-based Marxist gender-critical site, Freer Lives.  So we asked the comrade who set up that blog to write something for Redline on the blog, himself, his analysis of the rise of gender politics and ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • Government spin accepted by union leadership
    by Don Franks  The Auckland City Mission is struggling with a 40 percent increase in demand for food parcels this year. A total of 23,020 were needed by June. Last month Missioner Chris Farrelly told the Herald the “cupboards are bare” and without an emergency food drive, he can’t see ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • Forbidden Thoughts
    by The Council of Disobedient Women   Massey Wellington Student Association had a sit-in today. Imagine a sit-in. On a campus. Against a women’s rights meeting. Did the ’60s really happen or did we fucking dream it? They gathered in the student square, an echo chamber. Sitting on soft pillows ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • Much love to my loyal Ukrainian readership
    For some reasons, my post about the mystery message from inside the Downing Street bunker seemed to catch people's attention.  Quite a lot of hits from NZ (unsurprisingly) and the USA (a bit more puzzlingly, but hi there, USAians!!) and 76 views from the Ukraine.I've celebrated my Ukrainian readers in ...
    1 week ago
  • Another day of bonkers GNUmours (again, sorry)
    First, almost a score of Labour MPs seem to have sent a letter to the EU basically begging them to accept a deal - any deal - just so Britain can get the Heck on with Brexiting instead of being trapped in limbo:
    To avoid no deal, deliver on the ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour vs working class immigrants – again!
    by Phil Duncan In 2016 the National-led government suspended the Parent Visa Category, through which migrants were able to bring their parents into New Zealand.  Since then over 5,700 people have been in immigration limbo, stuck on the visa wait list. Labour is now bringing back the scheme.  Well, sort ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • Speak Up for Women press statement: on Massey University and Feminism 2020
    The following was released yesterday (Tues, October 8) by the women’s liberation organisation Speak Up for Women. On 23 September Speak Up For Women announced that we would be holding an event at the Massey University Theaterette in Wellington. The event is called Feminism 2020. The intention of the event ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • Farmers support dirty rivers
    The government is currently consulting on plans to improve freshwater quality. So naturally, farmers oppose it:South Taranaki farmers are preparing to fight proposed national freshwater changes that some fear will bankrupt them. The Government's proposed National Environment Standard on Freshwater Management, released in September, rated the Waingongoro River as one ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • No-one cares about local government
    Yesterday was the last day for (reliably) posting your vote away in local body elections. Turnouts are mostly much lower than the equivalent time last year (Palmerston North is down 2.3%), and so naturally people are pushing their online-voting snake oil again. Because the online census worked so well, lets ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • The political ghosts of eugenics may matter more than the genetic
    This essay, on the political legacy of the eugenics movement, by Kenan Malik was originally published in the Observer on 6 October 2019, under the headline ‘The spirit of eugenics is still with us, as immigrants know to their cost’. Birth control. Intelligence tests. Town planning. Immigration controls. It’s striking how ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • “Surplus” again
    Another year, and the government has announced another enormous government "surplus". And just like last year, its nothing of the sort. When we have people homeless and sick and hungry, when we have schools and hospitals still falling down, when we have underpaid public servants and infrastucture unmaintained or unbuilt, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Inside the Downing Street bunker
    James Forsyth at The Spectator (I know, I know) has tapped one of his contacts inside Number Ten for an insight into the Johnson administration's thinking and strategy.It is fascinating, unsettling and quite, quite mad.  Some key points:Negotiations have stalled and the Johnson administration are keen to blame the EU: ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Taking Control Of The Nation’s Story.
    Fatal Contact: With the arrival of captain James Cook in October 1769, the islands of what would become New Zealand ceased to be the preserve of Polynesian navigators and settlers and became a part of both the world’s map and the world’s history.THE MAORI NATIONALIST assault upon the historical meaning ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Are GNUs extinct?
    Another round of tactical talks about forming a Government of National Unity have come to nothing with the Liberal Democrats still refusing countenance putting Jeremy Corbyn into Downing Street:Opposition talks on Monday made little headway over when to try and vote down Boris Johnson's government and who might succeed him as ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour chickens out again
    When the government was elected, it promised to lead the way on electric vehicles, and specifically to make the government vehicle fleet emissions-free where-practicable by 2025.They lied:There are 15,473 vehicles in the government fleet and only 78 are electric. When the coalition Government came into power in late 2017, the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Transgender extremism, violence at work against feminist meeting at British Labour Party conference
    by Nick Rogers The debate around the meaning of sex and gender made an appearance at this year’s British Labour Party conference in Brighton. Women’s Place UK – an organisation that questions the demand that biological males who self-identify as woman should have access to women’s spaces, to all-women shortlists, ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Rebelling in Wellington
    Yesterday I went down to Wellington to participate in the Extinction Rebellion protest. Its part of the latest global wave of XR actions, with actions happening all over the world. Some of those protests are massively disruptive: in Canada, XR is blocking major bridges, stopping people from getting to work. ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • ‘The Workshop’ – Report: Talking about Poverty and Welfare Reform: A Guide to Strategies that ...
    The Workshop is a charitable trust for public good. The Workshop undertake research to find ways of communicating that will build support for the solutions that work to solve complex social and environmental problems. See their Report on Talking about Poverty and Welfare Reform below. ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    2 weeks ago
  • Exclusive language
    What is language? We generally assume that it a facility unique to humans, allowing us to share what’s in and on our minds. We can tell of our plans, our past exploits, our knowledge. It also allows us to lie. And yet there are vast numbers of people we can’t ...
    SciBlogsBy Michael Corballis
    2 weeks ago

  • Methane reducing cattle feed one step closer
    The Government today announced its support for a project that could substantially reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emissions from cattle. The announcement was made as part of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s and Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor’s visit to Nelson’s Cawthron Aquaculture Park. The Cawthron Institute will receive $100,000 from the Government’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    23 hours ago
  • Bill to refresh superannuation system passes first reading
    Social Development Minister Carmel Sepuloni has welcomed the first reading of the New Zealand Superannuation and Veteran’s Pension Legislation Amendment Bill. “Every New Zealander has a stake in New Zealand Superannuation and Veteran’s Pension,” says Carmel Sepuloni. “They are our most common form of social assistance – nearly 800,000 New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government announces next steps in fight against measles
    Babies in Auckland aged six months and over can receive a free vaccination and children will all have access to vaccines, Associate Minister of Health Julie Anne Genter announced today at Papatoetoe High School.   The move comes as part of Government efforts to step up the fight against measles. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Speech to the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, Pacific Futures: Connections, Identity...
    ***Check against delivery*** Good morning. It is a pleasure to be here, and to have the honour of opening this important conference on behalf of the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. Let us take the opportunity to acknowledge all the people who have helped make today possible, including our special ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Police trial new response to high risk events
    Police Minister Stuart Nash says the safety of frontline officers and members of the public will be the focus of a new trial of specialist Police response teams in three of our largest urban centres. Police have this morning released details of an initiative to be trialled in Counties Manukau, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New awards celebrate fisheries sustainability
    The Minister of Fisheries is calling for entries for a new public award to celebrate innovation in our seafood sector. “I have established the Seafood Sustainability Awards to recognise and celebrate those throughout industry, tangata whenua and communities who demonstrate outstanding dedication and innovation towards the sustainability of New Zealand’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • More progress for women and we can do more
    Minister for Women Julie Anne Genter welcomes leaders in the private sector taking action on closing their gender pay gaps to ensure a fairer workplace for all New Zealanders. Ms Genter today launched a new report, Addressing the gender pay gap and driving women’s representation in senior leadership, from the Champions for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Proposals to curb environmental damage help our coasts and the oceans
    Government Ministers today welcomed the release of a marine environment report highlighting the four key issues affecting our oceans, estuaries and coastlines.  The release underlines the importance of government proposals to combat climate pollution, ensure clean freshwater, protect biodiversity, make land use more sustainable, and reduce waste and plastic.    Environment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New mental health facility for Waikato
    The Government has approved funding for a new acute mental health facility for Waikato which will provide better care and support to people with mental health and addiction issues. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Health Minister Dr David Clark announced the $100 million project to replace the aging Henry Rongomau ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • 500 new te reo Māori champions in our classrooms
    The Government is making progress on its goal to integrate te reo Māori into education by 2025, with over 500 teachers and support staff already graduating from Te Ahu o te Reo Māori,  Associate Education Minister Kelvin Davis announced today. Kelvin Davis made the announcement at an awards ceremony in Waikanae today, for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Minister James Shaw welcomes 2018 Census first release
    Statistics Minister James Shaw has welcomed the first release of 2018 Census data. The first release of data today, 23 September, includes key data on population, regional growth, the number of homes and the size of different ethnic groups in New Zealand. Data from the 2018 Census will support the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Driving transparency, ethics and accountability in government use of algorithms
    Minister for Statistics James Shaw today announced a public consultation on a proposed algorithm charter for government agencies. The charter has been developed by the Government Chief Data Steward in response to growing calls for more transparency in government use of data. Computer algorithms – procedures or formulas for solving ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Zealand and the Netherlands working together on climate change
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor, Climate Change Minister James Shaw and visiting Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte co-hosted a business roundtable in Auckland this morning focused on working together to address climate change.  “The Netherlands is an important partner for New Zealand. We share a strong agricultural history. Sustainable agribusiness and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Protecting fairness for workers and businesses
    The Government is taking action to build an inclusive economy where more of us receive our fair share at work and businesses can compete on great products and services, not undercutting wages and conditions, Immigration and Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Iain Lees-Galloway says. Two consultations launched today seek feedback ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Indigenous Freshwater Fish Bill Passes
    The future for New Zealand’s threatened indigenous freshwater fish looks brighter with the passing of the Conservation (Indigenous Freshwater Fish) Amendment Bill in Parliament today said Minister of Conservation, Eugenie Sage. “Until now, our freshwater fish legislation has been 20 years out of date. We have lacked effective tools to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Kiwis to take part in world’s biggest earthquake drill
    At 1.30pm tomorrow, hundreds of thousands of Kiwis will join about 65 million people around the globe in ShakeOut, the world’s biggest earthquake drill. The annual drill is to remind people of the right action to take during an earthquake which is to Drop, Cover, Hold, and to practise their ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Rising wages and low inflation supporting Kiwis
    Kiwis are benefiting from higher wage growth and low inflation under the Coalition Government. Stats NZ data out today shows the rise in the cost of living remains low, as annual Consumers Price Index (CPI) inflation fell to 1.5% in September from 1.7% in June. “The low inflation comes as ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • NZ economy strong amid global headwinds
    New Zealand’s economic strength and resilience has been recognised in a major update on the state of the global economy. The IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook released overnight shows a reduced global growth forecast over the next two years as issues like the US-China trade war and Brexit take hold. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Keeping New Zealanders safer with better counter-terrorism laws
    Justice Minister Andrew Little has today introduced a new Bill to prevent terrorism and support the de-radicalisation of New Zealanders returning from overseas. The Terrorism Suppression (Control Orders) Bill gives the New Zealand Police the ability to apply to the High Court to impose control orders on New Zealanders who ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Improved succession and dispute resolution core of Ture Whenua changes
    A Bill that proposes targeted changes to simplify the processes for Māori land owners when engaging with the Māori Land Court has had its First Reading today. “The approach taken by the Government is to ensure that the protection of Māori land remains a priority as we seek to improve ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Speech to CTU Biennial Conference
    Let me first thank all the new unionists and members in the room. There is nothing more important to improving people’s working lives than people making the decision to care, to get on board and help, to take up the reins and get involved. Congratulations to you. You bring the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Minister ensures continued Whenuapai flight operations
    Minister of Defence Ron Mark has signed a certificate exempting the activity of engine testing at Whenuapai Airbase from the Resource Management Act 1991. The Act gives the Minister of Defence the power to exempt activities for the purposes of national security.  The certificate will mean the recent Environment Court ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • NZ joins Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action
    Finance Minister Grant Robertson has announced New Zealand will join the Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action while attending APEC meetings in Chile. The objective of the 39 member Coalition is to share information and promote action to tackle climate change. It was formed in April this year, in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Feedback Sought – Section 71 – Lyttelton Parking
    Feedback sought– Lyttelton commercial zone parking  The Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration, Poto Williams, is seeking feedback on a proposal to remove on-site car parking requirements for new developments in the Lyttelton commercial zone.  The proposal, by Christchurch City Council, asks that powers under section 71 of the Greater ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Feedback Sought – Section 71 – Hagley Oval
    Hon Minister Poto Williams Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration   MEDIA STATEMENT       Tuesday 15 October 2019 Feedback sought – Hagley Oval The Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration, Poto Williams, is seeking feedback on a proposal about Hagley Oval. The proposal was developed by Regenerate Christchurch ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • CTU speech – DPM
    Ladies and gentlemen, NZCTU President Richard Wagstaff, members of respective unions – thank you for the invitation to speak to you today. This might be preaching to the choir, but the importance of trade unions in New Zealand’s historical arch is difficult to understate. And it is my belief that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Police Association Annual Conference
    "Let’s start by acknowledging that it has been a huge year. " Police Association Annual Conference James Cook Grand Chancellor Hotel Wellington Nau mai, haere mai. Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, ka nui te mihi, ki a koutou katoa. President of the Police Association, Chris Cahill; Members of the Association and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Zealand announces a further P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark have announced the New Zealand Government’s decision to again deploy a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea. New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Zealand deeply concerned at developments in north-east Syria
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says New Zealand continues to have serious concerns for peace and stability in north-east Syria. “Recent reports that hundreds of ISIS-affiliated families have fled from a camp are deeply concerning from a humanitarian and security perspective”, Mr Peters says. “While we acknowledge Turkey’s domestic security ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Government on high alert for stink bugs
    Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor is warning travelling Kiwis to be vigilant as the high-season for the crop-eating brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB) is under way. “We’re on high alert to stop BMSB arriving in NZ. The high season runs until April 30 and we’ve strengthened our measures to stop stink ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Better protections for students in halls of residence
    The Government is moving swiftly to change the law to improve the welfare and pastoral care of students living in university halls of residence and other tertiary hostels. Cabinet has agreed to several changes, including creating a new mandatory Code of Practice that sets out the duty of pastoral care ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New trapping guide for community and expert trappers alike
    The Minister for Conservation Eugenie Sage has launched a new comprehensive trapping guide for community trappers to help them protect our native birds, plants and other wildlife, at Zealandia in Wellington today. ‘A practical guide to trapping’, has been developed by the Department of Conservation (DOC), and was launched during ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Widening Access to Contraceptives Welcomed
    Associate Health Minister Julie Anne Genter welcomes PHARMAC’s move to improve access to long-acting reversible contraception (LARCs). PHARMAC has today announced it will fund the full cost of Mirena and Jaydess for anyone seeking long term contraception, lifting previous restrictions on access to Mirena. “I welcome women having greater choices ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Major upgrade for Taranaki Base Hospital
    The Government has approved the next stage of a major redevelopment of Taranaki Base Hospital, which will deliver new and improved facilities for patients. Health Minister Dr David Clark has announced details of a $300 million dollar project to build a new East Wing at the New Plymouth hospital. It ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Extra support for rural families
    Extra funding will allow Rural Support Trusts to help farming families, says Minister for Rural Communities and Agriculture Damien O’Connor. “I know that rural families are worried about some of the challenges facing them, including the ongoing uncertainty created by the Mycoplasma bovis outbreak. “Those concerns sit alongside ongoing worries ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Howard Leaque Beekeeper programme graduation
    Thank you for the opportunity to be here to present certificates to the 16 graduates who have completed a beekeeping course delivered by the Howard League.  Let us start by acknowledging Auckland Prison’s Deputy Prison Director Tom Sherlock, and Acting Assistant Regional Commissioner of Corrections Northern Region Scott Walker - ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Finance Minister to attend APEC meetings
    Finance Minister Grant Robertson leaves this weekend to attend the APEC Finance Ministers meeting in Santiago, Chile. Discussions between APEC Finance Ministers at the meeting will include the effects of the current global economic uncertainty, risks for APEC economies and sustainable development of the region. While at APEC Grant Robertson ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pacific languages are a source of strength, they ground us and build confidence
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio says for Pacific people, language can be a source of strength. It can help ground us and give us confidence. When we speak them, our languages provide us with an immediate and intimate access to our identity and our story - and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Major boost to support disabled people in sport and recreation
    The Coalition Government has announced an action plan to improve the wellbeing of disabled New Zealanders by addressing inequalities in play, active recreation and sport. The initiative includes training to develop a workforce that understands the needs of children and young people with a range of impairments, advocacy for fit ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • More prefab homes to be built as red tape cut
    The construction sector is being freed up to allow more homes to be built more quickly as the Government cuts through some of the red tape of the Building Act.  “Every New Zealander deserves a warm, dry, safe home and old inefficiencies in the Building Act make building slow and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago