web analytics

What good’s a story without any pictures?

Written By: - Date published: 1:23 pm, October 10th, 2007 - 48 comments
Categories: election funding - Tags:

Further to our release this morning of Hager’s testimony (PDF, 120K) refuting Brash and Key’s claim not to have planned their 2005 election campaign in cahoots with the Exclusive Brethren, we thought it might be nice to drop in some holiday shots of John and his reclusive mates.

Click the thumbnails for larger views.

key_brethren1.jpg key_brethren4.jpg

key_brethren2.jpg key_brethren3.jpg

48 comments on “What good’s a story without any pictures?”

  1. amk 1

    Ah more demonisation of the EB’s. Yawn

    How is it that the $800k pledge card theft and $15m spent of WFF (all taxpayer money) had nil impact on the election outcome, while scaremongering Labour sirens rage against the perfectly democratic activities of 6 businessmen was apparently at attempt to ‘buy’ an election.

    Labour now stands for one thing: Power by all/any means.

    Labour is working to steal re-election at all costs even if it means selling its voters out. They are disgracefully deceitful and show utter contempt towards the voters who placed their trust in that party.

  2. all_your_base 2

    amk, almost all parties overspent. They were all doing what they’d done before – *EXCEPT* – the National Party who by attempting to hide its relationship with the EB’s hoped to spend an extra *unattributable* $1.5m on its campaign. How can you possibly condone that?

    If you want to talk “Power by all/any means”, start there.

    What’s almost worse than the secrecy, is the lies that have followed. Brash was caught out and resigned. Key has managed to give the facts the slip – for the time being. He should come clean with the public on the true extent of his involvement. They deserve some honesty.

  3. Robinson 3

    Nil impact on the election outcome? Hmm I’d ask the Greens what they thought about that. It’s also worth pointing out that National used it’s leaders’ fund in 2002 to buy billboards and in 2005 to pay for imported campaign specialists. The EB broke the law by failing to put the correct authorisation on their material (in a deliberate attempt to disguise who was behind their $1.5m campaign – if you’ve known anyone who’s escaped from their church you’ll know why distancing themselves from their own campaign was a smart PR move).

    Oh and National also overspent by about $120k after “accidentally” failing to factor gst into their TV spend which I’m not sure they’ve actually paid yet (and yet people seem to see them as economically minded!) and spent hundreds of thousands if not millions on campaigning outside of the election period.

    As for WFF? It’s like a centre left social policy you fool. And last time I checked the current Govt was centre left. Ohhh it’s a conspiracy…

  4. Robert owen 4

    Tis diificult
    If RB and D4J get on here and start all their crap the place will go downhill rapidly.
    Have you got a posting policy ?

  5. Robinson 5

    I like trolls.

  6. r0b 6

    Welcome amk, the first troll on The Standard (at least as far as I know!).

    So this raises an intersting question. If we want to have a reasonable standard of debate around here, how do we respond to trolls? Ignore them? Try to counter them calmly and rationally? The one thing I think we *shouldn’t* do is rant back.

    In about 20 years of watching online forums evolve, I have never seen calm and rational debate work. No troll will ever change their views – “you can’t reason someone out of a position that they did not reason themselves into”.

    So, how best to respond to posts like this? I really don’t have an answer. Suggestions?

  7. r0b 7

    “I like trolls.”

    Well OK, they can be a bit entertaining. But they have terrible manners, and someone has to clean up the mess…

  8. tom-tom 8

    Could the moderator colour troll-text blue, then we could flick over them without reading?

  9. Sam Dixon 9

    ought to be careful not to label anyone who disagrees with the majority a troll, that way lies the mess that kiwiblog has become.

    amk,WfF is a government program, of course its funded with taxpayers’ money, that gives tax credits to families based on income and number of children. labour campaigned on WfF openly, voters could choose in their vote whether that was a program they wanted or not, no different from any other proposed fiscal outlay whether spending on health, or defence, or tax cuts or whatever.

    If you want to you can view any government fiscal outlay as a ‘bribe’, a tax cut in particular looks like one because the result is money directly in people’s pockets.

  10. Nih 10

    I would allow the trolls to post, ban the offensive and abusive ones and let reasonable freedom of expression run free.

    Let Redbaiter post, I’ve always wanted a profile of his IP addresses.

  11. amk 11

    r0b – happy to be here. if presenting an alternative view is being a troll then i’m happy to be labeled as such.

    in terms of style, i’ll take whatever personal abuse can be thrown at me and not respond in kind. i have seen what happens over a kiwiblog and there is some gross abuse there. childish.

    as for labour – i stand by my suggestion that their abuse of power is an outrageous sellout of their loyal voters. nz deserves better.

  12. Shane 12

    These people that criticise Labour, like they are saying “National is so much better”. National is no better. The worst part about that is they are not even in power. Therefore, what would they be like if they were in power?

    amk said: “Labour now stands for one thing: Power by all/any means.”

    National tells the voters what they want to hear, just to try and win the next general election. How is this any different?

  13. amk 13

    tom-tom, re: blue posts. just skip my posts and stay in your own little world. probably safer. for both of us.

  14. amk 14

    no Shane, National “might not be any better”. But better the devil you know eh?

    All I see Labour supporters do is critisise National, discredit Key etc etc. if Labour is so meritorious perhaps extolling their virtues, rather than damming the opposition might be valuable. Seems this site is quite single minded about the damming business.

  15. r0b 15

    “ought to be careful not to label anyone who disagrees with the majority a troll”

    That’s a good point Sam, thanks for the reminder.

    Contrary views certainly do not a troll make. However, I admit that I do find it hard to read the following as anything but trollish: “Labour now stands for one thing: Power by all/any means. Labour is working to steal re-election at all costs even if it means selling its voters out. They are disgracefully deceitful and show utter contempt towards the voters who placed their trust in that party”.

  16. Nih 16

    Apparently my query for redbaiter’s IP address REALLY upset some people. Check out this enjoyable thread:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/10/capital_punishment.html

    While I didn’t set out to do anything other than enjoy discussing some politics, it appears we’re having a real effect on people if they’re reading blogs like The Standard.

  17. r0b 17

    “r0b – happy to be here. if presenting an alternative view is being a troll then i’m happy to be labeled as such.”

    Alternative views come in various flavours – from informed debate (which I hope will always be welcome here) to trollish rants (which it would be nice if we could avoid).

    Now I took your original comment as a trollish rant. Apologies if that was judging you too hastily.

    “as for labour – i stand by my suggestion that their abuse of power is an outrageous sellout of their loyal voters. nz deserves better.”

    OK, you stand by your suggestion. But can you substantiate it? What exactly is Labour’s “abuse of power”? How is it a “sellout of their loyal voters?”. Please give some specific examples. This is a genuine request for information. I am trying to understand the world as you see it…

  18. woppo 18

    Like all homophobes Redbaiter’s REALLY sensitive about his dangly bits.

  19. Robinson 19

    I must say Nih – after looking at that thread I’m kinda pleased I got banned over there. I notice these are TV One stills any chance of a youtube clip base?

  20. all_your_base 20

    My Robinson, you are observant! And yes, if I get a chance today I’ll try and throw up a moovee.

  21. Lee C 21

    Tane – I’m here!

    Well at the risk of sounding ‘paranoid’ I invite your comments to this about Hager’s submission to the Selct Committee:

    There are several issues there, and Hager mixes them liberally with opinion and accusation, some of which stick, and some of which are his assumption (and here I regard anything that cannot be supported by evidence as such).
    In that regard, I have disregarded factors raised which I do not think are relevant to the Bill as it stands but will comment on what I think is relevant to New Zealand in the 2005 election.
    So the following is a summary of what I believe Hager was saying:
    · Firstly it is apparent that national attempted to circumvent the Election Rules by employing EB cash to the tune of $1.5 million
    · They used the lack of transparency in the present system to try to deny this when caught out & But they were caught and Brash resigned.
    · Hager says ‘the Bill’ is needed, I would disagree ‘A Bill’ is needed, but not this one.
    · He indicates there is a problem with the drafting of a definition of ‘election advertising’
    · He asserts that $60,000 is plenty of money to cover electioneering over a nine-month period
    · He suggests a $2 million spending cap for all parties in an election year.to cover concerns of Labour who aren’t prepared to move on anonymous donations
    · He indicates that controls on anonymous donations are absent from the Bill
    · Neither are there controls on secret trusts which are ‘worse than a third party campaign.”
    · Neither does the Bill tighten declarations on how money is spent
    · He says that we need to register third parties throughout the electoral cycle.
    My thoughts on this are much the same as before. When you get through the (and there’s that word again) hyperbole, my opinion of the Bill as it is drafted still sits with the criticisms I have made after reading the HRC and Law Society submissions.
    Why?
    Well, let me count the ways:
    · There is an issue with the drafting of a term for ‘election advertising’ (ok that could be sorted)
    · $60,000 is a small sum to be allowed over the nine months of an election.
    · Is the government subject to a cap?
    · $2 million is a good idea, but the Labour Party won’t go for that because of the anonymous donations they need
    · anonymous donations, secret trusts are not controlled so the Bill will encourage those things. If all the stuff about National and the EB is so evil, why wasn’t the Bill structured to address those very things?
    · Getting people to put their names and addresses on placards soes nothing to tighten declarations of spending (if we had a definition of what ‘spending’ is & and that is missing from the Bill)
    · The need to register third parties throughout the electoral cycle is negated by the gaping holes in the rest of the Bill’s construction. It is pointless bureaucracy.
    So Robert Owen, after you get through the valid criticism of how evil the EB and National were & the Bill itself, and this is in Hager’s own opinion, even though he comes across as an advocate for it & is a crock.
    And funnily enough that is my opinion of it too.
    Sorry.

    Thing is, I would wish for transparency about political donations, including secret trusts, and third-party involvemtn. I would also like to see a proper definition of what constitutes election spending, and I would like to see a reasonable time scale (and I think ninety days is reasonable) for these factors to be employed.
    It sounds like a National Party line, perhaps, but in all honesty, that is coincidental. I’m not trying to assert that two rights make a wrong, Far from it I’m trying to illustrate that there is a lot of sanctimonious twaddle coming from some quarters about how some people manipulate the existing laws, but fail to acknowledge the same when it happens to come from a Party with whom they agree.
    My view of the Bill is it is inherently badly written. No fine tuning can fix it.
    It’s like you have inherited a car, the body is rusted, the engine is shot, and the tyres are bald, but, rther than save your time an effort by having it crushed, yo are insisting that a bit of paint and some chrome polish will make it humm like new.
    As we say in the UK, ‘You can’t polish a turd!’
    Then it occurred to me, that Nicky Hager makes some VERY VALID points about the National Party Key, Brash et al and the Exclusive Brethrens collusion.

    BUt that was all in the ‘Hollow Men’ was it not?
    Hager’s testimony on that score amounted to little more than a grandiose plug for his book, abetted by Benson Pope who has his own reasosn to bury the EB.
    Are we suggesting that major constituional reform be based:
    not on public consultation or referendum (see Winston’s Party principles)
    not on a proper enquiry and cross-part consultation, but rather
    on one book? (as worthy and well written as it was?)
    I mean I can understand enthusing about a book, even giving it a glowing review!
    But to base major constituional Law reform on it!!??
    Hager, too must be even now counting the ways his royalties can go into his own pension fund and good luck to him, I say!

  22. amk 22

    rOb – how can Labour sit on piles of hoarded taxpayer cash when it claims to care for the needy and disadvantaged? while the good folks here may well cite individual cases to the contrary, the general standard of health, education and wellbeing of NZers has been declining on their watch.

    would this have been better or worse under national? who knows. what we do know is that there’s a pretty well established pattern of lying, deception and scaremongering from Labour designed to help keep them in power. In mean really. the EFB is a disgrace. The demonisation of the EBs is a disgrace. The state of essential services is a disgrace. The conduct of Helen Clark herself is a disgrace.

    I have voted Labour in the past and could well do so again in the future. But right now they are sooooo far from their roots as to be, as a kiwiblog poster put it, about as attractive as a cup of cold sick.

  23. r0b 23

    amk, I asked – what exactly is Labour’s “abuse of power”? How is it a “sellout of their loyal voters?”.

    Your most recent post claims that Labour has done a poor job on the health, education, and well-being of NZrs. I don’t happen to agree with you, but that’s a different debate – there’s nothing there about “abuse of power”.

    You then claim a “a pretty well established pattern of lying, deception and scaremongering from Labour designed to help keep them in power”. Once again I’d be interested to hear what you consider to be specific examples that support this claim. We could then compare them to the practices of the National party described in The Hollow Men, and try and work out which were the best examples of “a pretty well established pattern of lying, deception and scaremongering”.

    Then: “the EFB is a disgrace”. I can at least see where you are coming from here. I agree that the EFB is not perfect draft legislation, and I await the recommendations of the select committee with interest.

    Then: “The demonisation of the EBs is a disgrace”. Labour have certainly highlighted the role that the EBs played in the last election. As indeed they should. But to call it demonisation is a bit of a stretch.

    Then: “The conduct of Helen Clark herself is a disgrace”. Outside of the ranks of the Kiwiblog heartland, I don’t think you’d find too many people that agree with that claim. She has made some mistakes, but they are pretty insignificant blemishes on a long and distinguished record as PM.

    So in short, I still don’t see any substance to the claim that there is an “abuse of power” that is a “sellout of their loyal voters”?

  24. amk 24

    rOb – Was the pledge card theft abuse of power? Was the retrospective validation of that theft an abuse of power? Was the massive WFF campaign just before the last election a tool to liberate taxper funds for political gain? I think yes, yes and yes.

    Is a mountain of taxpayer income stockpiled for targeted or even scatter-cast vote bribes dishonest? I think yes.

    Is the demonisation of 6 business men scaremongering? I think yes. It’s not a stretch to use the ‘d’ term at all. a tiny minority has been singed out for vitriol and state-sponsored bigotry that is unprecedented. It was and remains disgusting.

    Is it appropriate for Helen Clarke to state “. if members opposite want to tempt me, there is always the possibility of investigations into Nick Smith’s contempt of court, Gerry Brownlee’s act of assault, or whether Mr Groser still uses cannabis.”. That sounds like a threat to abuse her powers. How many other such abuses have been quietly actioned.. after 8 years. None? Yeah right. Oh and let’s not start on Doone, speeding, forgery, Philip-Field whitewash etc etc.

    In terms of dishonesty, let’s not pretend that any politician is lily white. But we can and should hold those with the most power and most voter trust to account the most closely.

    As for the sellout of Labour voters the EFB is the icing on the cake. How is loyalty rewarded? With a gag.

    Helen Clark might be a successful PM… but in politics ‘successful’ and ‘good’ now appear mutually exclusive. She has, in my mind at least, helped create that distinction. And I helped put her in power. I feel as guilty as hell.

  25. Robinson 25

    Dude – there’s so much wrong there I don’t know where to start. How about the fact that these fuckers are not just “six business men” but representatives of one of the most fucked-up backwards religious institutions ever? This “six business men” meme National is peddling is sickening – rather than accept they devised a backhanded campaign with a bunch of freaks who’ve covered up pedophilia, treat women as chattels and use people’s access to their families to blackmail them, they’re trying to make out these scumbags are just ordinary, ok types and fools like you are buying into it. Who the fuck raised you? Wolves??? (apologies to any wolves reading this).

  26. amk 26

    The EBs are no more represented in the vile things you claim and the general population. The businessmen never purported to represent their faith and one can be sure that if they were labour partner members we never would have heard of them.

    If there is evidence of wrong doing then the police are there to prosecute. You and I both support that. Where we differ is that you appear ready to play judge, jury and executioner to justify the vicious demonosation. Hardly cricket eh…?

    I’m no fool – but (or perhaps because) I think differently to you. While the EFB is still an unimplemented part of the Labour master plan I’ll speak my mind.

    Oh, regarding wolves, it only takes a couple of hours cruising the blogosphere to see where the most rabid wolves hang out.

  27. thomas 27

    Waaa ooooooohhhhhhh

  28. Sam Dixon 28

    My wife is a wolf

  29. Robinson 29

    Um due – they are the Brethren. That means they don’t act outside of their church. It’s against their faith to do so. And if that’s not enough evidence then how about the same campaign was run in Aussie and Canada by different Brethren members (of course that could just be coincidence). The EB are not like us – they live their lives entirely within their church (I’ll give you a wee hint: “exclusive”). Your ilk are more than happy to attack (and rightly so) the North Korean leadership for this kind of attitude. How would you feel if found out the Labour party was conniving with Kim Jong-il during an election campaign?

  30. Robinson 30

    That should start “Um dude”. And Sam my apologies to your wife (my girlfriend’s a fox so I know the kind of prejudice one can face)

  31. r0b 31

    amk wrote: “Was the pledge card theft abuse of power?”

    Calling it “theft” is good right-wing political framing, but calling it theft doesn’t make it theft, no matter how often the claim is repeated. Labour repeated well established spending practices, which the Auditor-General retrospectively found to be improper. Although not required to do so, Labour paid the money back. That hardly constitutes “theft”. By the way, has National paid back its GST overspend yet?

    “Was the retrospective validation of that theft an abuse of power?”

    There was no theft. Retrospective validation of government accounts occurs every year. (A National government validated, for example, $50 million of unlawful tourism expenditure in one year).

    “Was the massive WFF campaign just before the last election a tool to liberate taxper funds for political gain?”

    How is an attempt to assist those in need an abuse of power? Yes, too often the timing of such things is driven by the electoral timetable, but all governments that I remember have played the same game there.

    “Is the demonisation of 6 business men scaremongering? I think yes. It’s not a stretch to use the ‘d’ term at all. a tiny minority has been singed out for vitriol and state-sponsored bigotry that is unprecedented. It was and remains disgusting.”

    I guess we may just have to agree to disagree on that. I look at the same events that you do, but I do not see what you see.

    “Is it appropriate for Helen Clarke to state…”.

    Debate in the House is rather robust. While you can quote this text out of context and make it sound scary, those who were in the house at the time and heard it, have made no comments on it that I am aware of. I would have thought that if any member of National felt threatened, we would have heard about it by now. (Perhaps we will hear about it soon – as blogs feed back into real life).

    “In terms of dishonesty, let’s not pretend that any politician is lily white. But we can and should hold those with the most power and most voter trust to account the most closely.”

    Hurrah! We agree on something.

    “As for the sellout of Labour voters the EFB is the icing on the cake. How is loyalty rewarded? With a gag.”

    I have said that I share some concerns about the EFB, but I think we both need to wait until there is final legislation to discuss.

    So in short, I still don’t see any substance to the claim that there is an “abuse of power” that is a “sellout of their loyal voters”?

  32. amk 32

    r0b, I stand by my “abuse of power” and “sellout” comments. I’ve backgrounded why. So we’re goning to agree to disagree – that’s fine. Thanks for doing so without raising your voice or suggesting that my parents have paws. Be well.

  33. r0b 33

    amk – re your post above, cheers, thanks for that, and likewise I’m sure. I’m really hoping that The Standard can have better kind of debate than is typical of blogs. We can all do our part.

  34. Robinson 34

    AMK, rOB. I’m sorry. I think Kiwiblog may have destroyed my ability to debate politely and rationally. I did think the Kim Jong Il analogy was quite a nice rhetorical touch though…

  35. amk 35

    “How would you feel if found out the Labour party was conniving with Kim Jong-iL?”

    🙂

  36. Robinson 36

    Ha!

  37. Shane 37

    I would like to add to the debate about the Exclusive Brethren…
    Somebody once said to me that if you don’t vote, don’t complain…true words I believe. On that note I feel the EB should simply zip it and crawl back to that idealistic world they came from.

    AMK you support them, obviously because they secretly throw money at your Nat mates. What do you personally think of them?

  38. amk 38

    Shane, I think the EB have a lots of odd attributes. so do model railway enthusiasts, online tantrax players and MP’s. that’s doesn’t stop any of these groups from being entitled to participate in NZ democratic debate. Democracy is enriched by diversity of opinion not conformity to anyone’s version of democracy. The EBs are entitled to have their say as publicly or as privately as they choose. That is their right as it is yours. So do I support them? No. Do I support their right to exercise the democratic freedoms afforded them in NZ? Absolutely!!

    I agree that the EBs should vote if they expect their concerns to accepted as a credible contribution to the democratic process. That they choose not to is odd, but perfectly legal.

    Let’s not go down the path of slamming secret donations. we all know that the Labour party receives lots and lots of these, has the power to stop them and has chosen not to do so. The day they legislate for transparency is the day that they (and their supporters) will be able to insist that other parties lift their own games, and not before.

    National are not my mates. I do not belong to any political party and have voted Labour, National, United Future, Social Credit and others over the years.

  39. amk 39

    Oh, and have also voted NZ First [hangs head in shame, slumps shoulders and shuffles away….]

  40. Nih 40

    It’s ok, I’ve voted Act. But I think a lot more of Prebble than I do most politicians.

  41. Robinson 41

    Nih – you just lost so much of my respect.

  42. r0b 42

    “AMK, rOB. I’m sorry. I think Kiwiblog may have destroyed my ability to debate politely and rationally.”

    Don’t let them take it away from you, Robinson. Join the (futile) battle for higher standards of online debate!

  43. tom-tom 43

    I listened to a couple of nasty young Exclusive Brethren ‘men’ threaten (in a scarcely veiled kind of way, face to face) the Green candidate at a meet-the-candidates event here, then and then go on to publicly slag off the Labour candidate for her never having had children! Their language was foul. These are twisted individuals, thriving under cover.

  44. Nih 44

    Nih – you just lost so much of my respect.

    Boo. I’m free to vote as I like. If you want to vote for a party based on other decisions, fine. I vote for the person with the best ideas, not the strongest following or the one my peers are voting for.

    I voted act because at the time MMP was new and it still seemed possible we could have a balanced government that gave more opportunity to alternative ideas and therefore more options. Too bad it turned out to require skill in politicking, which is why we’re still Labour/National/Winston Peters.

  45. Robinson 45

    And I’m free to not respect you for voting as you like. Jeez, blimmin libertarians see threats to their autonomy everywhere (oh and I still like you bro and I still respect you (just a little less).

  46. amk 46

    tom-tom – not good. the same scene was probably repeated all over the candidate meeting world, with people belonging to all manner of groups and from all sorts of political afiliations. based on the way one chap (who runs a kindergaten) bollocked a local candidate in my electorate it might be possible to assume that kindergaten owners are complete animals!

  47. Tane 47

    Except we know that the EB are. For a kindy owner, that would be an abberation. For the EB this would be part of the church’s modus operandi. I’m not saying all EB members are like this – I’ve known several women who have been trapped in that awful organisation with no hope of ever getting out. But they’re not the ones who were intimidating people at candidate meetings and organising electoral rorts with John Key.

  48. amk 48

    election rort? wrongdoing? i don’t think so but hey i’m open minded: call the police and have them investigate and lay charges… or, easier still, just a continue the smear campaign.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • New Zealand least corrupt country in the world
    New Zealand has regained its position as the least corrupt country in the world for the second time under this Coalition Government, says Justice Minister Andrew Little. “New Zealanders can be proud that our reputation as one of the least corrupt countries in the world has been restored,” says Andrew ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    13 hours ago
  • Boost for Rēkohu/Wharekauri/Chatham Islands Community Conservation
    Community conservation in Rēkohu/Wharekauri/the Chatham Islands is receiving a boost, with grants to support local projects announced today by Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage. “Rēkohu/Wharekauri/ the Chatham Islands are home to 20 per cent of New Zealand’s threatened bird species and 11 per cent of New Zealand’s threatened plant species. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Rātana Pā goes high-tech with UFB
    Iwi, hapu and visitors to Rātana Pā near Whanganui now have access to ultra-fast broadband following its connection, completed in time for annual Rātana celebrations, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones says. The connection and associated hardware were funded from the Provincial Growth Fund’s $21 million Marae Digital Connectivity programme, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Govt’s strong financial management acknowledged
    The Government’s strong financial management and plan to future proof the economy with new infrastructure investment has gained further recognition from an international ratings agency. Credit rating agency Fitch has upgraded one of its main metrics assessing the Government’s books, lifting its foreign currency AA rating outlook to ‘positive’ from ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Boost in Whānau Ora funding to keep changing lives
    Whānau throughout New Zealand are set to benefit from an extra three million dollars that will go directly to Whānau Ora Commissioning Agencies, the Minister for Whānau Ora Peeni Henare announced today.  Including previous funding boosts, the Agencies will now receive $87 million this year between them.  In Budget 2019 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • More people getting into work
    The December quarter benefit numbers released today show the Government’s plan to get people off the benefit and into work is starting to pay off,” Social Development Minister Carmel Sepuloni said.   “Nearly 19,000 people cancelled their benefit and went into work in the last few months of the year – ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    21 hours ago
  • Wairoa gets up to $6.1m to rebuild heart of CBD
    The Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) is investing up to $6.1 million to revitalise business and tourism opportunities in Wairoa, Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau announced today. The PGF is funding: Up to $4.8 million for the Wairoa Integrated Business and Tourism Facility Up to $960,000 for the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Major Events support for creative and cultural events
    Creative and cultural events that highlight New Zealand’s diverse culture and build national pride are set to get a funding boost through the Major Events Fund, Economic Development Minister Phil Twyford said today. The new Creative and Cultural Events Incubator, which is funded through the Major Events Fund, will open ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Classroom internet in hundreds of schools to get a boost
    The Government has begun a massive IT upgrade to provide more seamless internet access to 200 schools around the country. Te Mana Tūhono – Technology in Schools work programme will launch with a pilot of 10 smaller state schools early this year. IT equipment that gives students access to the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Construction workforce, apprenticeships hit record highs
    Working with industry and committing to rebuild New Zealand’s infrastructure has produced a record high number of Kiwis working in the construction industry and learning trades, says Minister for Building and Construction Jenny Salesa. New figures available today from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and the Tertiary Education ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • NZ concludes digital economy trade talks with Singapore and Chile
    A new trade agreement concluded today helps New Zealand exporters and consumers take advantage of opportunities from digital trade.    Minister for Trade and Export Growth David Parker together with Chile’s Vice Minister of Trade Rodrigo Yañez and Singapore’s Minister of Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing, have announced conclusion of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Provincial Growth Fund to fund Waipukurau cultural development and tourism
    The Ngā Ara Tipuna -  Waipukurau Pā Site Interpretation project will receive $2.798 million from the Provincial Growth Fund to create an authentic cultural tourism experience, Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau announced today “The project will inform visitors about the history of six pā sites in Waipukurau with a combination ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • 21 new judges boost diversity, improve access to justice
    Twenty-one new District Court judges have been appointed in a move that will improve access to justice and boost diversity on the bench. The new judges include replacements for retirements and 10 new positions. Attorney-General David Parker today announced the 14 judges who can immediately be named, with the remainder ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Puhinui to Auckland Airport in 10 minutes
    Aucklanders are another step closer to getting rapid transit to the airport, with the start of construction to upgrade State Highway 20B to the airport, Transport Minister Phil Twyford announced today. SH20B will be upgraded with additional lanes in each direction, dedicated to bus and high-occupancy vehicles between Pukaki Creek ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Advancing New Zealand’s trade agenda focus of Europe meetings
    World Trade Organisation reform, agricultural trade and a free trade agreement with the United Kingdom will be the focus of Minister for Trade and Export Growth David Parker’s visit to Europe this week. David Parker leaves on Tuesday for a series of meetings in the UK and Switzerland that aim ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Minister of Defence to visit counterparts in US and Canada
    The Minister of Defence, Ron Mark, departed today for the United States and Canada where he will meet with his counterparts.  While in Canada Minister Mark will meet with his counterpart, Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan.  “New Zealand and Canada are close friends, and share an instinctive like-mindedness on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Government to deliver family carers $2000 pay rise, expand scheme to spouses this year
    The Coalition Government is delivering this year the changes to Funded Family Care the disability sector has long-asked for, says Associate Minister of Health Jenny Salesa. “Today we are announcing the details of our big changes to Funded Family Care, including an annual average pay boost of $2,246.40 for funded ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Ko te reo kua mū: Piri Sciascia
    Minister for Māori Development Nanaia Mahuta joins te ao Māori in their sorrow as they learn of the loss of one of the great orators and spokespersons of a generation – Piri Sciascia.  “The son of Pōrangahau was a staunch advocate for Māori development and served his people for over ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Minister opens new ecosanctuary at Cape Farewell
    A new ecosanctuary with a predator proof fence on Golden Bay’s Cape Farewell, which will restore a safe home for sea birds, rare native plants, giant snails, and geckos, was officially opened today by the Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage. “There has been a fantastic community effort supported by the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Pacific partners work together to provide additional support to Australia
    The NZDF continues to support the Australian Defence Force (ADF) as it battles fires in Victoria and New South Wales, including by transporting Republic of Fiji Military engineers from Nadi to Australia, announced Defence Minister Ron Mark. On Saturday morning a NZDF Boeing 757 will depart New Zealand to uplift ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Kaikōura $10.88 million boost in tourism & business
    The Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) is investing $10.88 million to boost business and tourism opportunities in Kaikōura, Parliamentary Undersecretary for Regional Economic Development, Fletcher Tabuteau announced today. As part of the Kaikōura Marina Development Programme, the following two projects will receive PGF funding: A $9.88 million investment to begin the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Govt accounts in surplus, debt remains low
    The Government’s books are in good shape with the accounts in surplus and expenses close to forecast, Finance Minister Grant Robertson says. The Treasury today released the Crown accounts for the five months to November. The operating balance before gains and losses (OBEGAL) was above forecast by $0.7 billion resulting ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Auckland focus for first Police graduation of 2020
    The number of Police on the Auckland frontline is increasing with the graduation today of a special locally-trained wing of new constables. Police Minister Stuart Nash says the graduation of eighteen officers from Recruit Wing 333-5 means that more than 1900 new Police have been deployed since the Coalition Government ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Wairarapa gets $7.11m PGF water boost
    The Provincial Growth Fund is putting $7.11 million into creating a sustainable water supply for Wairarapa, Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau announced today. The following two projects will receive Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) funding: A $7 million investment in Wairarapa Water Limited for the pre-construction development of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Progress with new Police station in Mahia
    Community safety and crime prevention in the East Coast community of Mahia has moved forward with the opening of a new Police station to serve the growing coastal settlement. Police Minister Stuart Nash has officially opened the new station, which was relocated almost 20 kilometres along the coast from the nearby ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Plans to protect the future of whitebaiting announced
    With several native whitebait species in decline the Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage has today released proposals to standardise and improve management of whitebait across New Zealand. “The need for action for a healthy whitebait fishery has never been greater,” Eugenie Sage said.  “Four of the six whitebait species are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New resource for schools to increase awareness and understanding of climate change
    A new Ministry of Education resource available for schools in 2020 will increase awareness and understanding of climate change, Education Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The resource, Climate Change – prepare today, live well tomorrow, will help students understand the effects of climate change at a local, national and global ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Getting more out of our most productive firms
    Finance Minister Grant Robertson has approved the terms of reference for an Inquiry into the economic contribution of New Zealand's frontier firms. Frontier firms are the most productive firms in the domestic economy within their own industry. “These firms are important as they diffuse new technologies and business practices into ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • NZDF sends more support to Australia
    The New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) is sending an Environmental Health Team, a Primary Health Care Team and a Chaplain to Australia, boosting New Zealand support for the Australian Defence Force (ADF) as it battles bush fires in Victoria and New South Wales, Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today. The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand joins partners in calling for full investigation into air crash in Iran
    Acting Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Rt Hon Winston Peters says that developments suggesting a surface-to-air missile is responsible for the downing of the Ukrainian International Airlines flight in Iran is disastrous news. “New Zealand offers its deepest sympathies to the families of the 176 victims. It is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Staying connected to Australian agriculture
    Agriculture Minister, Damien O’Connor, says the Ministry for Primary Industries is continuing to stay connected to federal authorities in Australia as devastating fires affect the country.  “The Ministry is using an existing trans-Tasman forum for discussions on the agricultural impact of the fires and the future recovery phase,” says Damien ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Investment in schools – a commitment to communities
    Thousands of school-age children, their teachers and wider communities are benefiting from the Government’s multi-million dollar investment upgrading and renewing schools, Education Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “We want New Zealand to be the best place to be a child and that means learning in warm, comfortable and modern classrooms,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand Defence Force sends support to Australia
    Minister of Defence Ron Mark today announced New Zealand is sending three Royal New Zealand Air Force NH90 helicopters and crew, and two NZ Army Combat Engineer Sections as well as a command element to support the Australian Defence Force efforts in tackling the Australian fires.  The New Zealand Defence Force ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago