web analytics

What good’s a story without any pictures?

Written By: - Date published: 1:23 pm, October 10th, 2007 - 48 comments
Categories: election funding - Tags:

Further to our release this morning of Hager’s testimony (PDF, 120K) refuting Brash and Key’s claim not to have planned their 2005 election campaign in cahoots with the Exclusive Brethren, we thought it might be nice to drop in some holiday shots of John and his reclusive mates.

Click the thumbnails for larger views.

key_brethren1.jpg key_brethren4.jpg

key_brethren2.jpg key_brethren3.jpg

48 comments on “What good’s a story without any pictures? ”

  1. amk 1

    Ah more demonisation of the EB’s. Yawn

    How is it that the $800k pledge card theft and $15m spent of WFF (all taxpayer money) had nil impact on the election outcome, while scaremongering Labour sirens rage against the perfectly democratic activities of 6 businessmen was apparently at attempt to ‘buy’ an election.

    Labour now stands for one thing: Power by all/any means.

    Labour is working to steal re-election at all costs even if it means selling its voters out. They are disgracefully deceitful and show utter contempt towards the voters who placed their trust in that party.

  2. all_your_base 2

    amk, almost all parties overspent. They were all doing what they’d done before – *EXCEPT* – the National Party who by attempting to hide its relationship with the EB’s hoped to spend an extra *unattributable* $1.5m on its campaign. How can you possibly condone that?

    If you want to talk “Power by all/any means”, start there.

    What’s almost worse than the secrecy, is the lies that have followed. Brash was caught out and resigned. Key has managed to give the facts the slip – for the time being. He should come clean with the public on the true extent of his involvement. They deserve some honesty.

  3. Robinson 3

    Nil impact on the election outcome? Hmm I’d ask the Greens what they thought about that. It’s also worth pointing out that National used it’s leaders’ fund in 2002 to buy billboards and in 2005 to pay for imported campaign specialists. The EB broke the law by failing to put the correct authorisation on their material (in a deliberate attempt to disguise who was behind their $1.5m campaign – if you’ve known anyone who’s escaped from their church you’ll know why distancing themselves from their own campaign was a smart PR move).

    Oh and National also overspent by about $120k after “accidentally” failing to factor gst into their TV spend which I’m not sure they’ve actually paid yet (and yet people seem to see them as economically minded!) and spent hundreds of thousands if not millions on campaigning outside of the election period.

    As for WFF? It’s like a centre left social policy you fool. And last time I checked the current Govt was centre left. Ohhh it’s a conspiracy…

  4. Robert owen 4

    Tis diificult
    If RB and D4J get on here and start all their crap the place will go downhill rapidly.
    Have you got a posting policy ?

  5. Robinson 5

    I like trolls.

  6. r0b 6

    Welcome amk, the first troll on The Standard (at least as far as I know!).

    So this raises an intersting question. If we want to have a reasonable standard of debate around here, how do we respond to trolls? Ignore them? Try to counter them calmly and rationally? The one thing I think we *shouldn’t* do is rant back.

    In about 20 years of watching online forums evolve, I have never seen calm and rational debate work. No troll will ever change their views – “you can’t reason someone out of a position that they did not reason themselves into”.

    So, how best to respond to posts like this? I really don’t have an answer. Suggestions?

  7. r0b 7

    “I like trolls.”

    Well OK, they can be a bit entertaining. But they have terrible manners, and someone has to clean up the mess…

  8. tom-tom 8

    Could the moderator colour troll-text blue, then we could flick over them without reading?

  9. Sam Dixon 9

    ought to be careful not to label anyone who disagrees with the majority a troll, that way lies the mess that kiwiblog has become.

    amk,WfF is a government program, of course its funded with taxpayers’ money, that gives tax credits to families based on income and number of children. labour campaigned on WfF openly, voters could choose in their vote whether that was a program they wanted or not, no different from any other proposed fiscal outlay whether spending on health, or defence, or tax cuts or whatever.

    If you want to you can view any government fiscal outlay as a ‘bribe’, a tax cut in particular looks like one because the result is money directly in people’s pockets.

  10. Nih 10

    I would allow the trolls to post, ban the offensive and abusive ones and let reasonable freedom of expression run free.

    Let Redbaiter post, I’ve always wanted a profile of his IP addresses.

  11. amk 11

    r0b – happy to be here. if presenting an alternative view is being a troll then i’m happy to be labeled as such.

    in terms of style, i’ll take whatever personal abuse can be thrown at me and not respond in kind. i have seen what happens over a kiwiblog and there is some gross abuse there. childish.

    as for labour – i stand by my suggestion that their abuse of power is an outrageous sellout of their loyal voters. nz deserves better.

  12. Shane 12

    These people that criticise Labour, like they are saying “National is so much better”. National is no better. The worst part about that is they are not even in power. Therefore, what would they be like if they were in power?

    amk said: “Labour now stands for one thing: Power by all/any means.”

    National tells the voters what they want to hear, just to try and win the next general election. How is this any different?

  13. amk 13

    tom-tom, re: blue posts. just skip my posts and stay in your own little world. probably safer. for both of us.

  14. amk 14

    no Shane, National “might not be any better”. But better the devil you know eh?

    All I see Labour supporters do is critisise National, discredit Key etc etc. if Labour is so meritorious perhaps extolling their virtues, rather than damming the opposition might be valuable. Seems this site is quite single minded about the damming business.

  15. r0b 15

    “ought to be careful not to label anyone who disagrees with the majority a troll”

    That’s a good point Sam, thanks for the reminder.

    Contrary views certainly do not a troll make. However, I admit that I do find it hard to read the following as anything but trollish: “Labour now stands for one thing: Power by all/any means. Labour is working to steal re-election at all costs even if it means selling its voters out. They are disgracefully deceitful and show utter contempt towards the voters who placed their trust in that party”.

  16. Nih 16

    Apparently my query for redbaiter’s IP address REALLY upset some people. Check out this enjoyable thread:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/10/capital_punishment.html

    While I didn’t set out to do anything other than enjoy discussing some politics, it appears we’re having a real effect on people if they’re reading blogs like The Standard.

  17. r0b 17

    “r0b – happy to be here. if presenting an alternative view is being a troll then i’m happy to be labeled as such.”

    Alternative views come in various flavours – from informed debate (which I hope will always be welcome here) to trollish rants (which it would be nice if we could avoid).

    Now I took your original comment as a trollish rant. Apologies if that was judging you too hastily.

    “as for labour – i stand by my suggestion that their abuse of power is an outrageous sellout of their loyal voters. nz deserves better.”

    OK, you stand by your suggestion. But can you substantiate it? What exactly is Labour’s “abuse of power”? How is it a “sellout of their loyal voters?”. Please give some specific examples. This is a genuine request for information. I am trying to understand the world as you see it…

  18. woppo 18

    Like all homophobes Redbaiter’s REALLY sensitive about his dangly bits.

  19. Robinson 19

    I must say Nih – after looking at that thread I’m kinda pleased I got banned over there. I notice these are TV One stills any chance of a youtube clip base?

  20. all_your_base 20

    My Robinson, you are observant! And yes, if I get a chance today I’ll try and throw up a moovee.

  21. Lee C 21

    Tane – I’m here!

    Well at the risk of sounding ‘paranoid’ I invite your comments to this about Hager’s submission to the Selct Committee:

    There are several issues there, and Hager mixes them liberally with opinion and accusation, some of which stick, and some of which are his assumption (and here I regard anything that cannot be supported by evidence as such).
    In that regard, I have disregarded factors raised which I do not think are relevant to the Bill as it stands but will comment on what I think is relevant to New Zealand in the 2005 election.
    So the following is a summary of what I believe Hager was saying:
    · Firstly it is apparent that national attempted to circumvent the Election Rules by employing EB cash to the tune of $1.5 million
    · They used the lack of transparency in the present system to try to deny this when caught out & But they were caught and Brash resigned.
    · Hager says ‘the Bill’ is needed, I would disagree ‘A Bill’ is needed, but not this one.
    · He indicates there is a problem with the drafting of a definition of ‘election advertising’
    · He asserts that $60,000 is plenty of money to cover electioneering over a nine-month period
    · He suggests a $2 million spending cap for all parties in an election year.to cover concerns of Labour who aren’t prepared to move on anonymous donations
    · He indicates that controls on anonymous donations are absent from the Bill
    · Neither are there controls on secret trusts which are ‘worse than a third party campaign.”
    · Neither does the Bill tighten declarations on how money is spent
    · He says that we need to register third parties throughout the electoral cycle.
    My thoughts on this are much the same as before. When you get through the (and there’s that word again) hyperbole, my opinion of the Bill as it is drafted still sits with the criticisms I have made after reading the HRC and Law Society submissions.
    Why?
    Well, let me count the ways:
    · There is an issue with the drafting of a term for ‘election advertising’ (ok that could be sorted)
    · $60,000 is a small sum to be allowed over the nine months of an election.
    · Is the government subject to a cap?
    · $2 million is a good idea, but the Labour Party won’t go for that because of the anonymous donations they need
    · anonymous donations, secret trusts are not controlled so the Bill will encourage those things. If all the stuff about National and the EB is so evil, why wasn’t the Bill structured to address those very things?
    · Getting people to put their names and addresses on placards soes nothing to tighten declarations of spending (if we had a definition of what ‘spending’ is & and that is missing from the Bill)
    · The need to register third parties throughout the electoral cycle is negated by the gaping holes in the rest of the Bill’s construction. It is pointless bureaucracy.
    So Robert Owen, after you get through the valid criticism of how evil the EB and National were & the Bill itself, and this is in Hager’s own opinion, even though he comes across as an advocate for it & is a crock.
    And funnily enough that is my opinion of it too.
    Sorry.

    Thing is, I would wish for transparency about political donations, including secret trusts, and third-party involvemtn. I would also like to see a proper definition of what constitutes election spending, and I would like to see a reasonable time scale (and I think ninety days is reasonable) for these factors to be employed.
    It sounds like a National Party line, perhaps, but in all honesty, that is coincidental. I’m not trying to assert that two rights make a wrong, Far from it I’m trying to illustrate that there is a lot of sanctimonious twaddle coming from some quarters about how some people manipulate the existing laws, but fail to acknowledge the same when it happens to come from a Party with whom they agree.
    My view of the Bill is it is inherently badly written. No fine tuning can fix it.
    It’s like you have inherited a car, the body is rusted, the engine is shot, and the tyres are bald, but, rther than save your time an effort by having it crushed, yo are insisting that a bit of paint and some chrome polish will make it humm like new.
    As we say in the UK, ‘You can’t polish a turd!’
    Then it occurred to me, that Nicky Hager makes some VERY VALID points about the National Party Key, Brash et al and the Exclusive Brethrens collusion.

    BUt that was all in the ‘Hollow Men’ was it not?
    Hager’s testimony on that score amounted to little more than a grandiose plug for his book, abetted by Benson Pope who has his own reasosn to bury the EB.
    Are we suggesting that major constituional reform be based:
    not on public consultation or referendum (see Winston’s Party principles)
    not on a proper enquiry and cross-part consultation, but rather
    on one book? (as worthy and well written as it was?)
    I mean I can understand enthusing about a book, even giving it a glowing review!
    But to base major constituional Law reform on it!!??
    Hager, too must be even now counting the ways his royalties can go into his own pension fund and good luck to him, I say!

  22. amk 22

    rOb – how can Labour sit on piles of hoarded taxpayer cash when it claims to care for the needy and disadvantaged? while the good folks here may well cite individual cases to the contrary, the general standard of health, education and wellbeing of NZers has been declining on their watch.

    would this have been better or worse under national? who knows. what we do know is that there’s a pretty well established pattern of lying, deception and scaremongering from Labour designed to help keep them in power. In mean really. the EFB is a disgrace. The demonisation of the EBs is a disgrace. The state of essential services is a disgrace. The conduct of Helen Clark herself is a disgrace.

    I have voted Labour in the past and could well do so again in the future. But right now they are sooooo far from their roots as to be, as a kiwiblog poster put it, about as attractive as a cup of cold sick.

  23. r0b 23

    amk, I asked – what exactly is Labour’s “abuse of power”? How is it a “sellout of their loyal voters?”.

    Your most recent post claims that Labour has done a poor job on the health, education, and well-being of NZrs. I don’t happen to agree with you, but that’s a different debate – there’s nothing there about “abuse of power”.

    You then claim a “a pretty well established pattern of lying, deception and scaremongering from Labour designed to help keep them in power”. Once again I’d be interested to hear what you consider to be specific examples that support this claim. We could then compare them to the practices of the National party described in The Hollow Men, and try and work out which were the best examples of “a pretty well established pattern of lying, deception and scaremongering”.

    Then: “the EFB is a disgrace”. I can at least see where you are coming from here. I agree that the EFB is not perfect draft legislation, and I await the recommendations of the select committee with interest.

    Then: “The demonisation of the EBs is a disgrace”. Labour have certainly highlighted the role that the EBs played in the last election. As indeed they should. But to call it demonisation is a bit of a stretch.

    Then: “The conduct of Helen Clark herself is a disgrace”. Outside of the ranks of the Kiwiblog heartland, I don’t think you’d find too many people that agree with that claim. She has made some mistakes, but they are pretty insignificant blemishes on a long and distinguished record as PM.

    So in short, I still don’t see any substance to the claim that there is an “abuse of power” that is a “sellout of their loyal voters”?

  24. amk 24

    rOb – Was the pledge card theft abuse of power? Was the retrospective validation of that theft an abuse of power? Was the massive WFF campaign just before the last election a tool to liberate taxper funds for political gain? I think yes, yes and yes.

    Is a mountain of taxpayer income stockpiled for targeted or even scatter-cast vote bribes dishonest? I think yes.

    Is the demonisation of 6 business men scaremongering? I think yes. It’s not a stretch to use the ‘d’ term at all. a tiny minority has been singed out for vitriol and state-sponsored bigotry that is unprecedented. It was and remains disgusting.

    Is it appropriate for Helen Clarke to state “. if members opposite want to tempt me, there is always the possibility of investigations into Nick Smith’s contempt of court, Gerry Brownlee’s act of assault, or whether Mr Groser still uses cannabis.”. That sounds like a threat to abuse her powers. How many other such abuses have been quietly actioned.. after 8 years. None? Yeah right. Oh and let’s not start on Doone, speeding, forgery, Philip-Field whitewash etc etc.

    In terms of dishonesty, let’s not pretend that any politician is lily white. But we can and should hold those with the most power and most voter trust to account the most closely.

    As for the sellout of Labour voters the EFB is the icing on the cake. How is loyalty rewarded? With a gag.

    Helen Clark might be a successful PM… but in politics ‘successful’ and ‘good’ now appear mutually exclusive. She has, in my mind at least, helped create that distinction. And I helped put her in power. I feel as guilty as hell.

  25. Robinson 25

    Dude – there’s so much wrong there I don’t know where to start. How about the fact that these fuckers are not just “six business men” but representatives of one of the most fucked-up backwards religious institutions ever? This “six business men” meme National is peddling is sickening – rather than accept they devised a backhanded campaign with a bunch of freaks who’ve covered up pedophilia, treat women as chattels and use people’s access to their families to blackmail them, they’re trying to make out these scumbags are just ordinary, ok types and fools like you are buying into it. Who the fuck raised you? Wolves??? (apologies to any wolves reading this).

  26. amk 26

    The EBs are no more represented in the vile things you claim and the general population. The businessmen never purported to represent their faith and one can be sure that if they were labour partner members we never would have heard of them.

    If there is evidence of wrong doing then the police are there to prosecute. You and I both support that. Where we differ is that you appear ready to play judge, jury and executioner to justify the vicious demonosation. Hardly cricket eh…?

    I’m no fool – but (or perhaps because) I think differently to you. While the EFB is still an unimplemented part of the Labour master plan I’ll speak my mind.

    Oh, regarding wolves, it only takes a couple of hours cruising the blogosphere to see where the most rabid wolves hang out.

  27. thomas 27

    Waaa ooooooohhhhhhh

  28. Sam Dixon 28

    My wife is a wolf

  29. Robinson 29

    Um due – they are the Brethren. That means they don’t act outside of their church. It’s against their faith to do so. And if that’s not enough evidence then how about the same campaign was run in Aussie and Canada by different Brethren members (of course that could just be coincidence). The EB are not like us – they live their lives entirely within their church (I’ll give you a wee hint: “exclusive”). Your ilk are more than happy to attack (and rightly so) the North Korean leadership for this kind of attitude. How would you feel if found out the Labour party was conniving with Kim Jong-il during an election campaign?

  30. Robinson 30

    That should start “Um dude”. And Sam my apologies to your wife (my girlfriend’s a fox so I know the kind of prejudice one can face)

  31. r0b 31

    amk wrote: “Was the pledge card theft abuse of power?”

    Calling it “theft” is good right-wing political framing, but calling it theft doesn’t make it theft, no matter how often the claim is repeated. Labour repeated well established spending practices, which the Auditor-General retrospectively found to be improper. Although not required to do so, Labour paid the money back. That hardly constitutes “theft”. By the way, has National paid back its GST overspend yet?

    “Was the retrospective validation of that theft an abuse of power?”

    There was no theft. Retrospective validation of government accounts occurs every year. (A National government validated, for example, $50 million of unlawful tourism expenditure in one year).

    “Was the massive WFF campaign just before the last election a tool to liberate taxper funds for political gain?”

    How is an attempt to assist those in need an abuse of power? Yes, too often the timing of such things is driven by the electoral timetable, but all governments that I remember have played the same game there.

    “Is the demonisation of 6 business men scaremongering? I think yes. It’s not a stretch to use the ‘d’ term at all. a tiny minority has been singed out for vitriol and state-sponsored bigotry that is unprecedented. It was and remains disgusting.”

    I guess we may just have to agree to disagree on that. I look at the same events that you do, but I do not see what you see.

    “Is it appropriate for Helen Clarke to state…”.

    Debate in the House is rather robust. While you can quote this text out of context and make it sound scary, those who were in the house at the time and heard it, have made no comments on it that I am aware of. I would have thought that if any member of National felt threatened, we would have heard about it by now. (Perhaps we will hear about it soon – as blogs feed back into real life).

    “In terms of dishonesty, let’s not pretend that any politician is lily white. But we can and should hold those with the most power and most voter trust to account the most closely.”

    Hurrah! We agree on something.

    “As for the sellout of Labour voters the EFB is the icing on the cake. How is loyalty rewarded? With a gag.”

    I have said that I share some concerns about the EFB, but I think we both need to wait until there is final legislation to discuss.

    So in short, I still don’t see any substance to the claim that there is an “abuse of power” that is a “sellout of their loyal voters”?

  32. amk 32

    r0b, I stand by my “abuse of power” and “sellout” comments. I’ve backgrounded why. So we’re goning to agree to disagree – that’s fine. Thanks for doing so without raising your voice or suggesting that my parents have paws. Be well.

  33. r0b 33

    amk – re your post above, cheers, thanks for that, and likewise I’m sure. I’m really hoping that The Standard can have better kind of debate than is typical of blogs. We can all do our part.

  34. Robinson 34

    AMK, rOB. I’m sorry. I think Kiwiblog may have destroyed my ability to debate politely and rationally. I did think the Kim Jong Il analogy was quite a nice rhetorical touch though…

  35. amk 35

    “How would you feel if found out the Labour party was conniving with Kim Jong-iL?”

    🙂

  36. Robinson 36

    Ha!

  37. Shane 37

    I would like to add to the debate about the Exclusive Brethren…
    Somebody once said to me that if you don’t vote, don’t complain…true words I believe. On that note I feel the EB should simply zip it and crawl back to that idealistic world they came from.

    AMK you support them, obviously because they secretly throw money at your Nat mates. What do you personally think of them?

  38. amk 38

    Shane, I think the EB have a lots of odd attributes. so do model railway enthusiasts, online tantrax players and MP’s. that’s doesn’t stop any of these groups from being entitled to participate in NZ democratic debate. Democracy is enriched by diversity of opinion not conformity to anyone’s version of democracy. The EBs are entitled to have their say as publicly or as privately as they choose. That is their right as it is yours. So do I support them? No. Do I support their right to exercise the democratic freedoms afforded them in NZ? Absolutely!!

    I agree that the EBs should vote if they expect their concerns to accepted as a credible contribution to the democratic process. That they choose not to is odd, but perfectly legal.

    Let’s not go down the path of slamming secret donations. we all know that the Labour party receives lots and lots of these, has the power to stop them and has chosen not to do so. The day they legislate for transparency is the day that they (and their supporters) will be able to insist that other parties lift their own games, and not before.

    National are not my mates. I do not belong to any political party and have voted Labour, National, United Future, Social Credit and others over the years.

  39. amk 39

    Oh, and have also voted NZ First [hangs head in shame, slumps shoulders and shuffles away….]

  40. Nih 40

    It’s ok, I’ve voted Act. But I think a lot more of Prebble than I do most politicians.

  41. Robinson 41

    Nih – you just lost so much of my respect.

  42. r0b 42

    “AMK, rOB. I’m sorry. I think Kiwiblog may have destroyed my ability to debate politely and rationally.”

    Don’t let them take it away from you, Robinson. Join the (futile) battle for higher standards of online debate!

  43. tom-tom 43

    I listened to a couple of nasty young Exclusive Brethren ‘men’ threaten (in a scarcely veiled kind of way, face to face) the Green candidate at a meet-the-candidates event here, then and then go on to publicly slag off the Labour candidate for her never having had children! Their language was foul. These are twisted individuals, thriving under cover.

  44. Nih 44

    Nih – you just lost so much of my respect.

    Boo. I’m free to vote as I like. If you want to vote for a party based on other decisions, fine. I vote for the person with the best ideas, not the strongest following or the one my peers are voting for.

    I voted act because at the time MMP was new and it still seemed possible we could have a balanced government that gave more opportunity to alternative ideas and therefore more options. Too bad it turned out to require skill in politicking, which is why we’re still Labour/National/Winston Peters.

  45. Robinson 45

    And I’m free to not respect you for voting as you like. Jeez, blimmin libertarians see threats to their autonomy everywhere (oh and I still like you bro and I still respect you (just a little less).

  46. amk 46

    tom-tom – not good. the same scene was probably repeated all over the candidate meeting world, with people belonging to all manner of groups and from all sorts of political afiliations. based on the way one chap (who runs a kindergaten) bollocked a local candidate in my electorate it might be possible to assume that kindergaten owners are complete animals!

  47. Tane 47

    Except we know that the EB are. For a kindy owner, that would be an abberation. For the EB this would be part of the church’s modus operandi. I’m not saying all EB members are like this – I’ve known several women who have been trapped in that awful organisation with no hope of ever getting out. But they’re not the ones who were intimidating people at candidate meetings and organising electoral rorts with John Key.

  48. amk 48

    election rort? wrongdoing? i don’t think so but hey i’m open minded: call the police and have them investigate and lay charges… or, easier still, just a continue the smear campaign.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Bringing back the health of Hauraki Gulf
    New marine protection areas and restrictions on fishing are among a raft of changes being put in place to protect the Hauraki Gulf for future generations. The new strategy, Revitalising the Gulf – Government action on the Sea Change Plan, released today, draws on input from mana whenua, local communities, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Speech to AI Forum – Autonomous Weapons Systems
    AI Forum New Zealand, Auckland Good evening and thank you so much for joining me this evening. I’d like to start with a thank you to the AI Forum Executive for getting this event off the ground and for all their work and support to date. The prospect of autonomous ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago
  • New Zealand boosts support to Fiji for COVID-19 impact
    Aotearoa New Zealand is providing additional support to Fiji to mitigate the effects of the current COVID-19 outbreak on vulnerable households, Foreign Minister Hon Nanaia Mahuta announced today. “Recognising the increasingly challenging situation in Fiji, Aotearoa will provide an additional package of assistance to support the Government of Fiji and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    21 hours ago
  • Round 2 of successful energy education fund now open
    $1.65 million available in Support for Energy Education in Communities funding round two Insights from SEEC to inform future energy hardship programmes Community organisations that can deliver energy education to households in need are being invited to apply for the second funding round of the Support for Energy Education in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    21 hours ago
  • New Ngarimu scholarships to target vocational training
    Associate Education Minister Kelvin Davis today announced three new scholarships for students in vocational education and training (VET) are to be added to the suite of prestigious Ngarimu scholarships. “VET learners have less access to study support than university students and this is a way to tautoko their learning dreams ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    21 hours ago
  • Recognising the volunteers who support our health system
    Nominations have opened today for the 2021 Minister of Health Volunteer Awards, as part of National Volunteer Week. “We know that New Zealanders donate at least 159 million hours of volunteer labour every year,” Minister of Health Andrew Little said in launching this year’s awards in Wellington. “These people play ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Drug Free Sport supported to deal with new doping challenges
    Drug Free Sport New Zealand will receive a funding boost to respond to some of the emerging doping challenges across international sport. The additional $4.3 million over three years comes from the Sport Recovery Fund announced last year. It will help DFSNZ improve athletes’ understanding of the risks of doping, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government support for South Auckland community hit by tornado
    The Government is contributing $100,000 to a Mayoral Relief Fund to support Auckland communities impacted by the Papatoetoe tornado, Acting Minister for Emergency Management Kris Faafoi says. “My heart goes out to the family and friends who have lost a loved one, and to those who have been injured. I ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Celebrating World Refugee Day
    World Refugee Day today is an opportunity to celebrate the proud record New Zealanders have supporting and protecting refugees and acknowledge the contribution these new New Zealanders make to our country, the Minister of Immigration Kris Faafoi said. “World Refugee Day is also a chance to think about the journey ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Face to face meeting delivers significant progress on NZ-UK FTA
    New Zealand and the UK have committed to accelerating their free trade agreement negotiations with the aim of reaching an agreement in principle this August, Trade Minister Damien O’Connor announced. “We’ve held constructive and productive discussions towards the conclusion of a high-quality and comprehensive FTA that will support sustainable and inclusive trade, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government taking action to protect albatross
    New population figures for the critically endangered Antipodean albatross showing a 5 percent decline per year highlights the importance of reducing all threats to these very special birds, Acting Minister of Conservation Dr Ayesha Verrall says. The latest population modelling, carried out by Dragonfly Data Science, shows the Antipodean albatross ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Adoption laws under review
    New Zealand’s 66-year-old adoption laws are being reviewed, with public engagement beginning today.  Justice Minister Kris Faafoi said the Government is seeking views on options for change to our adoption laws and system. “The Adoption Act has remained largely the same since 1955. We need our adoption laws to reflect ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Wider roll-out of cameras on boats to support sustainability and protect marine life
    Up to 300 inshore commercial fishing vessels will be fitted with on-board cameras by 2024 as part of the Government’s commitment to protect the natural marine environment for future generations.  Minister for Oceans and Fisheries David Parker today announced the funding is now in place for the wider roll out ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Plan for vaccine rollout for general population announced
    New Zealanders over 60 will be offered a vaccination from July 28 and those over 55 from August 11, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced today. The rollout of the vaccine to the general population will be done in age groups as is the approach commonly used overseas, with those over ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand introduces Belarus travel bans
    New Zealand has imposed travel bans on selected individuals associated with the Lukashenko regime, following ongoing concerns about election fraud and human rights abuses after the 2020 Belarus elections, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta has announced. The ban covers more than fifty individuals, including the President and key members of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • NZ economy grows driven by households, construction and business investment
    The Government’s efforts to secure the recovery have been reflected in the robust rebound of GDP figures released today which show the economy remains resilient despite the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, Grant Robertson said. GDP increased 1.6 percent in the first three months of 2021. The Treasury had ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Milestone 250th tower continues to improve rural connectivity
    The Government has welcomed the completion of the 250th 4G mobile tower, as part of its push for better rural connectivity. Waikato’s Wiltsdown, which is roughly 80 kilometres south of Hamilton, is home to the new tower, deployed by the Rural Connectivity Group to enable improved service to 70 homes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Quarantine Free Travel pause with Victoria to lift on Tuesday
    Following a further public health assessment of the COVID-19 outbreak in greater Melbourne, New Zealand’s Quarantine Free Travel pause with Victoria has been extended to 11.59pm on Tuesday 22 June, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins says. It has been determined that the risk to public health in New Zealand continues ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Prime Minister mourns passing of Dr Sir Ian Hassall
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is mourning the passing of Dr Sir Ian Hassall, New Zealand’s first Children’s Commissioner and lifelong champion for children and children’s health. As a paediatrician Sir Ian contributed to a major world-first cot death study that has been directly credited with reducing cot deaths in New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • APEC structural reform meeting a success
    APEC ministers have agreed working together will be crucial to ensure economies recover from the impact of COVID-19. Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs David Clark, chaired the virtual APEC Structural Reform Ministerial Meeting today which revolved around the overarching theme of promoting balanced, inclusive, sustainable, innovative and secure growth ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Digital hub to boost investment in forestry
    A new website has been launched at Fieldays to support the forestry sector find the information it needs to plant, grow and manage trees, and to encourage investment across the wider industry. Forestry Minister Stuart Nash says the new Canopy website is tailored for farmers, iwi and other forestry interests, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government continues support for rangatahi to get into employment, education and training
    Over 230 rangatahi are set to benefit from further funding through four new He Poutama Rangatahi programmes, Minister for Social Development and Employment Carmel Sepuloni announced today. “We’re continuing to secure our economic recovery from COVID by investing in opportunities for rangatahi to get into meaningful employment, education or training ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • NCEA subjects up for consultation
    The education sector, students, their parents, whānau and communities are invited to share their thoughts on a list of proposed NCEA subjects released today, Education Minister Chris Hipkins says. This is a significant part of the Government’s NCEA Change Programme that commenced in 2020 and will be largely implemented by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Major investment in plantain forage programme aims to improve freshwater quality
    The Government is backing a major programme investigating plantain’s potential to help farmers protect waterways and improve freshwater quality, Acting Agriculture Minister Meka Whaitiri announced at Fieldays today. The Sustainable Food and Fibre Futures (SFFF) fund is contributing $8.98 million to the $22.23 million seven-year programme, which aims to deliver ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • America’s Cup decision
    The Minister responsible for the America’s Cup has confirmed the joint Crown-Auckland Council offer to host the next regatta has been declined by the Board of Team New Zealand. “The exclusive period of negotiation between the Crown, Auckland Council, and Team New Zealand ends tomorrow, 17 June,” said Stuart Nash. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Food and fibres sector making significant strides towards New Zealand’s economic recovery
    The Government is backing the food and fibres sector to lead New Zealand's economic recovery from COVID-19 with targeted investments as part of its Fit for a Better World roadmap, Forestry Minister Stuart Nash said. “To drive New Zealand’s recovery, we launched the Fit for a Better World – Accelerating ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to He Whenua Taurikura – New Zealand’s annual hui on countering terrorism and violent...
    Check against delivery Can I begin by acknowledging the 51 shuhada, their families and the Muslim community. It is because of the atrocious violent act that was done to them which has led ultimately to this, the start of a dialogue and a conversation about how we as a nation ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Cost of Government Southern Response proactive package released
    The Government has announced the proactive package for some Southern Response policyholders could cost $313 million if all those eligible apply. In December, the Minister Responsible for the Earthquake Commission, David Clark announced a proactive package for SRES claimants who settled their claims before October 2014. It trailed the judgment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • First period products delivered to schools
    The first period products funded as part of the Government’s nationwide rollout are being delivered to schools and kura this week, as part of wider efforts to combat child poverty, help increase school attendance, and make a positive impact on children’s wellbeing. “We know that nearly 95,000 9-to-18 year olds ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • New support to reduce emissions from public building and construction projects
    Government agencies are getting new support to reduce carbon emissions generated by construction of new buildings, with the release of practical guidance to shape decisions on public projects. The Ministers for Building and Construction and for Economic Development say a new Procurement Guide will help government agencies, private sector suppliers, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • He Whenua Taurikura: New Zealand’s first Hui on Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism
    The Prime Minister has opened New Zealand’s first hui on Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism, which is being held in Christchurch over the next two days. The hui delivers on one of the recommendations from the report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the terrorist attack on Christchurch masjidain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech to inaugural Countering Terrorism Hui
    E aku nui, e aku rahi, Te whaka-kanohi mai o rātou mā, Ru-ruku-tia i runga i te ngākau whakapono, Ru-ruku-tia i runga i te ngākau aroha, Waitaha, Ngāti Mamoe, Ngai Tahu, nāu rā te reo pohiri. Tena tātou katoa. Ki te kotahi te kakaho ka whati, ki te kapuia, e ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Campaign shines a light on elder abuse
    A new campaign is shining a spotlight on elder abuse, and urging people to protect older New Zealanders. Launched on World Elder Abuse Awareness Day, the Office for Seniors’ campaign encourages friends, whānau and neighbours to look for the signs of abuse, which is often hidden in plain sight. “Research suggests ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Farewelling sports administrator and philanthropist Sir Eion Edgar
    Sport and Recreation Minister Grant Robertson today expressed his sorrow at the passing of Sir Eion Edgar – a leading sports administrator and celebrated philanthropist who has made a significant impact both within and beyond the sport sector. “Sir Eion’s energy, drive and generosity has been truly immense. He leaves ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government to apologise for Dawn Raids
    The Government will make a formal apology for the wrongs committed during the Dawn Raids of the 1970’s. Between 1974 and 1976, a series of rigorous immigration enforcement policies were carried out that resulted in targeted raids on the homes of Pacific families. The raids to find, convict and deport overstayers ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Humanitarian support for Bangladesh and Myanmar
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced that New Zealand is providing NZ $8.25 million in humanitarian assistance to support refugees and their host populations in Bangladesh and to support humanitarian need of internally displaced and conflict affected people in Myanmar.  “Nearly four years after 900,000 Rohingya crossed the border ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Poroporoaki: Dame Georgina Kamiria Kirby
    E Te Kōkō Tangiwai, Te Tuhi Mareikura, Te Kākākura Pokai kua riro i a matou. He toka tū moana ākinga ā tai, ākinga ā hau, ākinga ā ngaru tūātea.  Haere atu rā ki te mūrau a te tini, ki te wenerau a te mano.  E tae koe ki ngā rire ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Feedback sought on future of housing and urban development
    New Zealanders are encouraged to have their say on a long-term vision for housing and urban development to guide future work, the Housing Minister Megan Woods has announced. Consultation starts today on a Government Policy Statement on Housing and Urban Development (GPS-HUD), which will support the long-term direction of Aotearoa ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Clean car package to drive down emissions
    New rebates for electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles start July 1 with up to $8,625 for new vehicles and $3,450 for used. Electric vehicle chargers now available every 75km along most state highways to give Kiwis confidence. Low Emission Transport Fund will have nearly four times the funding by 2023 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Progress towards simpler process for changing sex on birth certificates
    The Government is taking the next step to support transgender, non-binary and intersex New Zealanders, by progressing the Births, Deaths, Marriages and Relationships Registration Bill, Minister of Internal Affairs, Jan Tinetti announced today. “This Government understands that self-identification is a significant issue for transgender, non-binary and intersex New Zealanders, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago