“Why did you not ask?” – Apologies & culture

Written By: - Date published: 7:00 pm, July 2nd, 2014 - 56 comments
Categories: john key, same old national, sexism - Tags: , ,

In its handling of the case of the Malaysian Diplomat accused of attempted rape in NZ, the government has marginalised the concerns and sensitivities of the victim.  Their own arse covering was given a higher priority.  Jan Logie argued that this indicated the government was reinforcing rape culture in their choice of priorities.

From: https://www.dartmouth.edu/sexualabuse/educated/bringing_in_the_bystander/rape_culture.html

Jan Logie’s  speech in the urgent debate on the government’s negotiations on the waiving of diplomatic immunity today, addressed some very important, and, at that stage, some relatively marginalised issues.

Near the beginning of her speech, Logie noted (as had David Shearer in his speech), that at that point, the government had not issued an apology to the alleged victim of the robbery and attempted rape.  Murray McCully made an apology to John Key first.

Get that?  John Key’s senstivities were considered more important.  Or is that just another bit of arse covering, by distancing Key from any of the significant decisions made?

Addressing Minister Mc Cully Logie said:

You say, you should have known but you did not know.  My question  is,” why did you not ask?”

“This is a once in a decade event.” They come – this is your words, Minister.  that you’re now disputing, I guess. That sums up some of the confusion we are getting from you on this issue.

[…]

And you didn’t even bother to check in. to find out what happened.

If a government was putting victims at the heart of our responses. If we were putting violence prevention at the heart of our responses, that question would have been asked.

Logie was critical of the government’s claim to take issues of violence extremely seriously, for instance, in it’s latest family violence policy.

domestic violence hurts all

If they had been serious about stopping  inter-personal violence, they wouldn’t have neglected the victim so much in the way they dealt with the Malaysian , diplomatic immunity issue.  They would have put the victim at the heart of the way they responded to the alleged crime.  Failing to do this was reinforcing rape culture.

Logie argued that, if the government had put the victim at the heart, they would have done everything possible to ensure that the alleged perpetrator was kept in NZ to stand trial.  Now it is highly likely that the victim will need to travel to an unfamiliar country to give evidence, far from her home support network.

Some government speakers in the debate, who followed Logie, took offense at her taking a ‘holier than thou’ attitude.

Tim Groser said they take consideration of the victim extremely seriously, as they do the notion of justice for the victim.  He criticised “one member” (meaning Logie) for claiming that the government is indifferent to the victim’s situation.  He said this was “bordering on the insulting”.   Really?  They are insulted?  And how does that stack up in relation to the feelings of the victim?

In the government’s defense, Groser said they will do whatever is necessary to ensure the victim gets justice.  But, what Logie was arguing for, was more than getting “justice”.  It was about treating the victim with sensitivity and putting her at the heart of the issue.

[Update] Diplomat to return to NZ

On Stuff, it is reported that,

The diplomat allowed to leave New Zealand after an alleged sexual assault will return to face the charges, the Malaysian Government has announced.

In a statement tonight, it said the former defence staff assistant at the High Commission in Wellington would return to New Zealand to assist in the investigation of charges of burglary and assault with intent to commit rape.

The Malaysian Government said it had informed New Zealand Foreign Minister Murray McCully of the decision.

[Update#2] the survivor of the attempted rape, spoke to Jan Logie]. The survivor has been watching Parliament and is appalled and angry at the focus of government MPs, and the way she has not been listened to.

Lincoln Tan reports in today’s NZ Herald:

Ms Logie said the young woman had been watching parliamentary debates on television and was appalled by the focus of discussion about the case.

“Right at the moment she’s running on adrenaline and is angry. She’s been listening to all of these debates where she’s been reduced down to the phrase ‘the victim’. What she sees is the real issue – the fact that the system didn’t listen to her, and has effectively been setting up to deny her justice. She gets the connection to that and a lot of other people’s experience and she’s angry.”

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Mfat) chief executive John Allen apologised to the woman yesterday “for the turmoil that she has had to suffer”.

 

56 comments on ““Why did you not ask?” – Apologies & culture”

  1. AmaKiwi 1

    This offense happened on May 9. The alleged offender was out of the country in less than 48 hours. It took 7 weeks for it to come to light.

    Cover-up. Cover-up. Cover-up.

    It’s the National way.

  2. dv 2

    Tim Groser said they take consideration of the victim extremely seriously, as they do the notion of justice for the victim

    Not shown by actions Tim.

    How did it come to light?

    • Tracey 2.1

      and yet the victim doesnt feel considered by the government Mr Groser, I guess she is insulting the govt too?

  3. freedom 3

    excuse the repost, this thread was not up and I feel this is better suited here. Can a mod please delete the other posting on the JK telling lies thread?

    We are close to an election and no matter what Party you are, every topic is shone through that prism at some point in its discussion. National do not have a good history when it comes to the issue of handling sexual violence. They would have been rattled and very worried about this event, especially so soon after the Royals were in town. Any Government would have been.

    At the time of the attempted rape of a New Zealand woman by a foreign diplomat the National Government was planning the release of their new domestic violence policies. Considering National was soon to release such a pivotal arm of their election campaign, an arm now fractured by haste, it is puzzling how they did not seize the opportunity in front of them to actually do something powerful to protect New Zealand women.

    All they had to do, to achieve what may have been the highest polling in their history, would have been to not let the accused leave the country. All they had to do was physically stop him escaping. The ensuing Diplomatic Incident would have generated a global outpouring of congratulations to the Government of New Zealand for standing up for the victim of an attempted rape.

    Telling the world that rape is not ok is one thing. For a country to be seen on the global stage putting rights of the victim before the freedom of the accused? Well… National could have ridden that wave of support proudly into September and probably have locked up the election then and there. But to even see that opportunity, they would first have to care about the victim.

    The fact none of this happened only emphasizes the growing belief that one person the National Government never consider when swirling around in their self-protective spin, is the victim.

    I sincerely hope it is this issue more than any other which costs them the election

    [karol: Deletion of other post done]

  4. Tom Jackson 4

    I’m not sure that trying to shoehorn this event into the rape culture paradigm is helpful. It’s not rape culture but government self-interest that is the cause here. If it had suited them to have this man torn apart by wild dogs whilst they sang hymns to the eternal damnation of rapists, they would have gone with that.

    • There’s no “shoehorning” at all. When out of an entire organisation not one person thinks “Oh hey, we should discuss this situation with the survivor before making any decisions”, it’s rape culture at work. When the Minister of Foreign Affairs has allowed this situation to develop and thinks he owes an apology first to the Prime Minister, that’s rape culture at work.

      Not centering the survivor, not considering her needs and wishes, treating the whole situation like it’s a diplomatic boo-boo which needs to be brushed under the carpet: all of those things add up to not taking sexual violence seriously. And that’s, you guessed it, what we mean by the term “rape culture”.

      • karol 4.1.1

        To me, McCully, Key and the MFAT officials come into the categories of “bystanders”, and/or “calloused sexual attitudes” part of the rape culture diagram – and maybe some come into other parts of the diagram, given that we don’t know everything that went on.

      • freedom 4.1.2

        +1 thank you Stephanie
        for articulating so clearly what I suspect many of us had hunted for but not quite captured.

  5. Clemgeopin 5

    It is clear that Key and McCully are trying cleverly and cunningly to cover their backsides only after the disgraceful facts came to light through the efforts of some alert journalists. I think there is a whole lot of BS, misinformation and half truths being peddled and rinsed for public consumption by their slimy spin machine.

  6. dv 6

    Another point.
    The offence was on may 9th.
    Charges laid?, but the police could not hold him because of diplomatic status.

    Surely the police would then inform MFAT, withe the charges,
    Did that happen?

    Would that not be a red flag?

  7. The alleged sexual assault was on May 9. The accused was in court the next day.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade asked Malaysia to waive diplomatic immunity and Mr McCully was briefed.

    On May 12 Mr Key was briefed on the case. Separately, officials offered “for the accused to be taken back to Malaysia”.

    On May 21 Malaysia refused to waive diplomatic immunity. The next day Ismail fled New Zealand.

    Read more: http://www.3news.co.nz/Apologies-over-assault-accused-diplomat/tabid/1607/articleID/351126/Default.aspx#ixzz36IYUbobE

    Yet again the media let the PM off the hook.

    Yet he too took no further interest in the case, did not ask any further questions around what was happening…. instead focusing all smart*** smug faced attention on an 11 year old letter.

    This govt. has proven time and time again they don’t care about victims of crime, and certainly not sexual abuse victims (having made cuts to Sexual Abuse counselling and services as soon as getting in).

    They represent the epitome of evil in my eyes.

    • dv 7.1

      On May 12 Mr Key was briefed on the case. Separately, officials offered “for the accused to be taken back to Malaysia”.

      And yet Key on TVNZ july 2
      http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/government-under-fire-over-epic-diplomat-bungle-6017100

      “But I can only rely on the best advice that I am given. On SATURDAY when I was briefed on the issue I told everything I knew,” Mr Key says.

      I assume he is referring to sat May 28, and May 12th is not a Saturday

      • DirtydeedsNZ 7.1.1

        This makes sense – that Key would not get properly briefed about a potential international diplomatic incident with big ramifications while he was briefed immediately about the all important 2003 Liu letter as soon it was uncovered.

        Wish the media would do their friggen jobs and actually question his statements rather than letting his consistent inconsistent statements slide. The real one being granted constant “immunity” is Key.

  8. Populuxe1 8

    Riiiight. So which part of the Vienna Convention and Malaysia refusing to waive diplomatic immunity do you not understand? MFAT asked Malaysia to wave diplomatic immunity immediately – which part of that do you not understand? It would appear National’s only crime was covering up their own impotence, not rushing to defend a rapist.

    • freedom 8.1

      “What is clear is that our Malaysian colleagues believed not agreeing to the waiver was a process the New Zealand Government agreed with,” Mr Allen said.
      http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11286201

      • Populuxe1 8.1.1

        Which is diplomatic speak for The government can’t do anything without Malaysia’s consent because it is a signatory of the Vienna Convention, and Malaysia knows this.

        • freedom 8.1.1.1

          So your take is Malaysia is lying about their willingness to waive immunity? Ok, That is an opinion. Not one I can respect but hey, I don’t have to. I watched the activity in the House today. All of it. (well up to halfway through Hayes speech anyway, the guy is valium in a suit)

          McCully is a seasoned campaigner. He is no novice when facing the chamber in urgent debate. He was not behaving like a man with nothing to hide. His trembling, his faltering voice, the way he folded his arms across his chest as he spoke, it all betrayed the seriousness of the events.

        • Tom Jackson 8.1.1.2

          He’s coming back, so you were wrong. The Malaysians aren’t rapist sheltering barbarians – they’ve been telling the truth the whole time.

          Responsibility for this debacle lies with McCully and Key not taking a proper interest in what is an exceptional and important case.

          • Populuxe1 8.1.1.2.1

            This is, however a recent development and I never suggested that the Malaysians were “rapist sheltering barbarians” – it is true, however, that in the first instance they refused to waive diplomatic immunity, which locked the government into a very limited set of responses and as much as I can’t stand them, I feel they were misrepresented.

            • felix 8.1.1.2.1.1

              “it is true, however, that in the first instance they refused to waive diplomatic immunity”

              Refused?

              You must be privy to some information that none of the rest of us have seen.

    • North 8.2

      Dear Old Tory Populuxe…….trying hard again.

      In my experience there’s nothing more vile than a Tory you know what…….

      For decades I’ve been in a position to come very, very reliably to that conclusion. They are the worst. Truly ! Press me and I’ll tell you more.

      • Populuxe1 8.2.1

        I find your binary thinking most quiant – like visiting a museum. Calling bullshit does not make on a Tory. If the nice Mr Pavlov tinkles his bell, will you still drool?

    • emergency mike 8.3

      “After inspecting the file himself last night, Mr McCully said it became clear that New Zealand’s messages to Malaysia had been ambiguous.

      And officials advising Malaysia’s Foreign Minister, Anifah Mana, were entitled to believe from informal communications from MFAT that the course of action Malaysia took would be acceptable to New Zealand.”

      Run that through your diplomatic translator. Weird, I would have thought that putting the victim first would mean that we would make it very clear to the Malaysians that that course of action would be less than ‘acceptable’. And that wouldn’t be too difficult.

      Not so much covering up their own impotence Pop, more like covering up the fact that they didn’t really care about the interests of the victim. Not a good look in sexual assault cases.

      • Tracey 8.3.1

        and yet what he inspected hasnt been released to the public… Still just the letters that suited his version. I do not accept he hadnt seen the whole file and read it before releasing those two letters.

      • Populuxe1 8.3.2

        Actually it sounds like a lot of hearsay and confused arse-covering

        • emergency mike 8.3.2.1

          If by hearsay you mean people on blogs speculating about how the negotiations really went down and how well briefed Key and/or McCully were about that, then by crickey not much gets past you. I’m assuming you’re not privy to that information, and thus your “I feel they were misrepresented” is just much hearsay as any.

          “confused arse-covering”

          No argument there.

        • freedom 8.3.2.2

          http://thestandard.org.nz/why-did-you-not-ask-apologies-culture/#comment-843858

          Populuxe1, have you read this statement from the Malaysian Government?
          “During the discussion on 12 May, the New Zealand side had offered an alternative for the accused to be brought back to Malaysia. It was never our intention to treat the matter lightly.”

  9. emergency mike 9

    Key gets caught out bullshitting yet again. Please, as if him and McCully wouldn’t have known exactly how it went down. He just said something that sounded sufficiently butt-covering that he thought no one would check or deny.

    What is painfully clear from this disaster is that the victim is well down the list of priorities. “I’ve apologied to John Key.” Um what?

  10. Skinny 10

    Muz is a liability and Key wants rid of him. His wink wink nudge nudge I’ll sort it out style has caught him out. Mr PR spin is rightfully had a blow put up his arse!

  11. North 11

    Been checking out Facebook. There is real anger that the victim’s position has been coldly subjugated. No, worse than that, completely ignored. In favour of patently cheap, wickedly uncaring, scamming, Notional Party political games. To wit the sought and duly given coverage of buffoon Sir Les Patterson’s (McCully’s) grovelling, slavish, fulsome, most unmanly apology to GodKey.

    It is becoming truly Monty Pythonesque. I fervently hope that if only subliminally at this point, people are saying “Nah, nah, bloody nah !”. To burst out, nearer to election day, in an angry consciousness which says “Nah, fuck this shit – he ain’t God !”

    #TeamShonKey – please please please crank up the God gazing, crank up the idolatry ! I’ll give you odds there are clinically focused spin-makers in the Notional Party spin-factory who are warning about this right now. It’s becoming an ugly religiosity on a truly Monty Pythonesque scale.

    Just take a gecko at Kool-Aid-Fizzy-Anus…….lost it completely.

  12. emergency mike 12

    Stuff is reporting that Malaysia is sending the accused man back to NZ. Looks like they have caved to public outrage in their own country.

    Counting down to John Key saying “Move on,” in 5, 4, 3,…

    • Tom Jackson 12.1

      It looks like they were telling the truth all the time.

      • emergency mike 12.1.1

        I never said they weren’t telling the truth. Did you look at the link? They brought him home under diplomatic immunity, but now the story has blown up. Now they are sending him back.

  13. Gruntie 13

    John Armstrong in Herald this morning says

    “It is quite possible that the New Zealand officials put up their option of ensuring the diplomat was quietly returned to Malaysia – something which would have suited everyone bar the victim of the assault”

    Wrong John! the effect goes far beyond the woman whom was attacked – it effects her family, her friends, her community, the reputation of our courts, state etc – all of us ! to imply that only the woman is affected is just dumb.

    • karol 13.1

      And no call for the PM to resign?

      • Jack 13.1.1

        Armstrong hit the nail on the head “they were hoping it would all quietly die a natural death and the official would slip quietly back to Malaysia”, the rights of the victim are the collateral damage in this decision.

        Obviously McCully, Key, and MFAT are more concerned about the diplomatic relations with Malaysia.

      • Tracey 13.1.2

        and no documents supporting the view the govt fought hard to keep him here. Just the one letter released.

        • Populuxe1 13.1.2.1

          There’s nothing they could have done. If Malaysia hadn’t waived diplomatic immunity the scumbag is protected by the Vienna Convention.

          • Tracey 13.1.2.1.1

            so you agree they didnt fight hard to keep him here, which is what mccully and key said nz had done?

            • Populuxe1 13.1.2.1.1.1

              Fight how exactly? Or do you not understand how diplomatic immunity works? Which bit are you not clear on? The “diplomatic” or the “immunity”?

              • emergency mike

                Fight how? Well for a start Pop, we could make sure that this doesn’t happen: “…officials advising Malaysia’s Foreign Minister, Anifah Mana, were entitled to believe from informal communications from MFAT that the course of action Malaysia took would be acceptable to New Zealand.”

                Because Malaysia didn’t have to invoke the diplomatic immunity. And if they were to be of the understanding that that course of action was not acceptable to NZ, because that would not be in the best interests of justice for the victim, then maybe, the Malaysians would have agreed.

                Which is in fact what they have publicly stated: they said no because they thought we were ok with that. And lookie see Pop, now they have offered to send the accused back to NZ to face trial here. So please stop with the “don’t you know what diplomatic immunity is / we were powerless to do anything” line, it’s embarrassing.

          • Pascal's bookie 13.1.2.1.2

            But that’s where the lack of interest from the Ministers comes in Pop.

            We know that after the third party notes there were ongoing less formal communications. We know that there was ambiguity from our side.

            Malaysia claims they offered a to waive. It seems our ambiguity was in response to this, and that it happened on the 12th of May, the same day the PM was briefed.

            We don’t know when the PM was briefed on the the 12th, or what was in the briefing. We are told an email from within MFAT was sent to one Ministerial staffer, and this was the only communication with the Minister’s office, but it was not read.

            We don’t the ‘whys’ around that, or the contents of that email.

            Nor do we know why the Minister didn’t keep a running brief on what was happening, even though it would seem to be a clear thing for the no surprises policy to cover.

            So the ‘hands were tied by treaty’ line is just piffle, discussions were ongoing, we know this. It’s a fact. What we don’t know is who knew discussions were ongoing, and if they dind’t know, was it deliberate on the part of MFAT staffers, or negligence on the part of Ministers.

            • freedom 13.1.2.1.2.1

              here is the Malaysian Government press release that states quite clearly their impression of the meeting on 12 May

              “During the discussion on 12 May, the New Zealand side had offered an alternative for the accused to be brought back to Malaysia. It was never our intention to treat the matter lightly.”

          • freedom 13.1.2.1.3

            There are always choices Populuxe1. Some just require more spine than others.
            http://thestandard.org.nz/why-did-you-not-ask-apologies-culture/#comment-843235

            • Populuxe1 13.1.2.1.3.1

              The choice to violate international law? Because that always looks good.

              • McFlock

                the choice on whether to make it clear that the nz diplomat who said we’d be cool if immunity wasn’t waived mispoke. Badly.

                That was the choice that disgraced us.

              • felix

                Since when is it illegal for diplomats to exercise diplomacy?

  14. One Anonymous Bloke 14

    Groser displays similar tendencies to people not a million miles from The Standard. Criticise their behaviour and they take it as a personal attack.

    Powerful stuff from Logie: good points well made.

  15. Gruntie 15

    Minister resigns – yeah right

  16. aerobubble 16

    Putting the victim at the heart of the debate. What National? National do not think like that. National does not believe in society. Its profit before people. That’s why they can’t be trusted on TPP. National time and again do the profit analysis and miss some social risk in the calculation, only then to have to back track and realize the policy revolution they have just exposed society to, harms more than helps.

    Labour needs not only to attack National on their poor shrunken economic thinking, but also on the what many conservatives used to believe inviolable, the greater good, society. Thatcherism was able to ignore society, beat society out of the conservative party because the economy was set to growth gangbusters due to decades of cheap middle eastern oil. Then she imposed a deregulating, private market only, view of economics that any moderately intelligent brown noser could easily recite ad nausea. Where did men like Whyte get so cock sure of their pro-incest views, but by ignoring any concerns of society, that’s how. If you live in a fish bowl, alone, then you get very individually centered. Whyte, and his ilk, are constructs of their time, not independent thinkers, they do open the up to the floor, society, least they are exposed for their shallowness.

    Our future is based on oil, oil has peaked, oil will continue to become more expensive and high energy intensive infrastructure will not return the benefits they once did. Society is no longer underwritten by cheap energy, and so the politics of hard decisions and hard ideology has returned.
    National are incapable of managing the transition to the future economic and philosophies.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • All Kiwis to have same standard of cancer care
    Labour is promising that all New Zealanders will have access to the same level of cancer care no matter where they live in the country, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.   “As someone who has survived cancer I ...
    13 hours ago
  • Infrastructure announcement too long coming
    “What took you so long?” is Labour’s response to the Government’s announcement of a new infrastructure investment vehicle. Labour’s Auckland Issues spokesperson Phil Twyford says Labour announced its policy in 2015 to debt-finance infrastructure and service that debt with targeted ...
    13 hours ago
  • Time for a breather on immigration
    National has no idea how to house the record number of people entering New Zealand, let alone cope with the pressure on health, education, and transport from this record population growth, says Labour’s Immigration spokesperson Iain Lees-Galloway. ...
    3 days ago
  • Labour to invest $4 billion in education
    Labour’s Education Manifesto will bring positive change across the education sector and is backed by a massive investment, says Labour’s Education Spokesperson Chris Hipkins.  “Labour’s plan will see an extra $4 billion invested over the next four years. It’s organised ...
    3 days ago
  • National’s shame: worst homelessness in the OECD
    National’s legacy is a housing crisis that has given New Zealand the worst homeless rate in the developed world, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    3 days ago
  • Labour taking action on school donations
    Labour will end so-called voluntary school donations for the majority of parents across the country under its $4 billion plan to revitalise the education sector, says Labour Leader Andrew Little. “Labour has always been committed to a world-class free education ...
    3 days ago
  • Labour to work with Queenstown to build more houses
    Labour will work with Queenstown-Lakes District Council, iwi, and the Community Housing Trust to build the modern, affordable housing Queenstown desperately needs, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    4 days ago
  • Nats blow the Budget on motels after bowling state houses
    National is spending $140,000 a day putting homeless families in motels, the legacy of nine years of selling off and knocking down state houses, says Labour Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    4 days ago
  • New revelations in Joanne Harrison report
    The State Services Commission’s report into the treatment of whistle-blowers by Joanne Harrison has revealed new accusations against the convicted fraudster, says Labour MP Sue Moroney.  “The report found that four staff inside the Ministry of Transport who had raised ...
    4 days ago
  • Snafu at Princess Margaret
    Jonathan Coleman has to stop the stalling over a new building for mental health services in Christchurch to replace the quake damaged Princess Margaret Hospital, says Labour’s Health spokesperson David Clark. “The Government must accept that Christchurch is still recovering ...
    4 days ago
  • Labour’s fiscal plan to build a fairer New Zealand
    Labour will re-build our housing, health and education while responsibly managing New Zealand’s finances, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.  “Under Labour’s Fiscal Plan we will deliver big investments in the services we all need and care about, invest ...
    5 days ago
  • Nats show they’re the tax dodgers’ best friends
    The government is taking the knife to IRD at a time when we need a highly skilled department to ensure that multinationals and speculators don’t get away with dodging tax, says Labour’s Revenue spokesperson Michael Wood. ...
    5 days ago
  • Labour secures the future for NZ Super
    A Labour Government will secure the future for New Zealand Superannuation so we can continue to provide superannuation to those retiring at age 65, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “One of the first things a Labour-led Government will ...
    5 days ago
  • Multinationals must pay fair share of tax
    A Labour Government will crack down on multinational companies that are dodging paying their fair share of tax, says Labour Leader Andrew Little. “New Zealanders are missing out by hundreds of millions according to the IRD because multinational companies can ...
    6 days ago
  • ACT’s approach to children backward and ill informed
    Act’s new deputy leader’s claim that Labour’s support for families could “extend the misery of child poverty and even child abuse” is ill informed and offensive, says Labour’s Deputy Leader Jacinda Ardern. ...
    1 week ago
  • Canterbury hatchet job a disgrace
    The Government’s glib acceptance of advice that the Canterbury District Health Board doesn’t need more money is a hatchet job and a disgrace, says Labour’s Health Spokesperson David Clark. “To claim that the DHB was using tactics to leverage more ...
    1 week ago
  • Quality for Kiwi kids at ECE
    After more than a decade of rapid growth in the number of children participating in Early Childhood Education (ECE), it’s time to take stock and map out a clear plan for the future, says Labour’s Education spokesperson Chris Hipkins. ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour to boost ECE quality
    Labour will ensure kids get the best start in life by boosting funding for Early Childhood Centres to employ 100 per cent qualified and registered teachers, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour will stump up a million dollars for Maniototo Hospital
    A Labour led Government will make a million dollars available to rebuild the Maniototo Base hospital in Ranfurly, says the Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little.  “This will be a much needed boost for a long overdue rebuild that has ...
    1 week ago
  • No vision for the West Coast
    The West Coast welcomes any Government investment in our region but the lack of any real alternative vision for the West Coast’s economy is disappointing, says Damien O’Connor Labour’s West Coast-Tasman MP.  “The establishment of a Mining Research Unit will ...
    2 weeks ago
  • National’s youth work scheme too little too late
    After nine years, National’s belated attempt to provide work opportunities for unemployed youth should be seen for what it is, a half-hearted, election gimmick from a party that’s ignored the problem till now, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Kiwis won’t fall for Joyce’s spin
    Steven Joyce’s embarrassingly obvious spin on Labour’s Families Package won’t fool anyone, says Labour’s Finance spokesperson Grant Robertson. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour prioritises families and public services
    Labour’s Families Package delivers a bigger income boost to more than 70 per cent of families with children than Budget 2017. By not spending $1.5 billion a year on tax cuts, Labour is able to do more for lower and ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Kiwis can’t sleep in your ghost houses, Nick
    The Government’s housing infrastructure announcement is another Nick Smith special – over-promising with no detail on delivery, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour helps older New Zealanders and low income families with winter heating bills
    Labour will further boost its commitment to warm, healthy housing with a Winter Energy Payment for superannuitants and people receiving main benefits, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “Everyone deserves a warm, healthy home to live in. But that’s ...
    2 weeks ago
  • National must rule out retrospective override for Ruataniwha
    National must categorically rule out using retrospective legislation to override the Supreme Court’s decision that the land swap of conservation land flooded by the proposed Ruataniwha Dam was illegal, says Labour’s Shadow Attorney General David Parker. “Having not got their ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Flavell’s failure a win for Māori landowners
    The Māori Development Minister’s admission that his unpopular Ture Whenua Māori Bill won’t pass into law prior to the election is a victory for Māori landowners, but only a change of government will keep the Bill gone for good, says ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Stats confirm growing housing shortfall
    National’s failure to fix the housing shortage has been starkly illustrated by new statistics, says Labour Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Systemic abuse of kids in state care
    After admitting there was systemic abuse of children in State care the Government must do the right thing and launch an independent inquiry, says Labour’s Deputy Leader Jacinda Ardern. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Migrant worker exploitation needs sharper focus
    The astonishing number of employers found guilty of exploiting migrants shows that migrant exploitation is a serious problem in New Zealand, says Labour Workplace Relations and Safety spokesperson Iain Lees-Galloway. “A total of 53 companies have been banned from recruiting ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Minister faces questions over dam debacle
    Today’s Supreme Court ruling dismissing an appeal to allow a land swap for the controversial Ruataniwha Dam is a victory for our conservation estate and Hawke’s Bay ratepayers, but leaves the Conservation Minister with serious questions to answer, says Ikaroa-Rāwhiti ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Too little too late on Wellington housing
    The announcement today on social housing in Wellington by the National Government is a pitiful and cynical election ploy, says Labour’s Wellington Central MP Grant Robertson. “In 2012 Housing New Zealand emptied out the Gordon Wilson Flats, taking 130 places ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Foreign trusts wilt in the sunlight, but more transparency needed
    The fact that the numbers of foreign trusts registered in New Zealand has plummeted after the Government’s belated and reluctant imposition of a new reporting regime, in the wake of the Panama Papers scandal, shows the need for a transparent, ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Speech by Grant Robertson: The Future of Work and Labour’s Economic Vision
    At the election in September voters will face a choice between a government led by Andrew Little with a fresh approach to give every New Zealander a fair share in prosperity or the continuation of a tired government, out of ...
    3 weeks ago