Why Socialism? – Albert Einstein

Written By: - Date published: 6:53 am, July 24th, 2010 - 42 comments
Categories: Deep stuff, socialism - Tags:

Longer than your average blog post. But worth reading the thoughts of one of the greatest minds ever. Hat tip Information Clearing House. — r0b

Why Socialism?

By Albert Einstein

This essay was originally published in the first issue of Monthly Review (May 1949).

Is it advisable for one who is not an expert on economic and social issues to express views on the subject of socialism? I believe for a number of reasons that it is.

Let us first consider the question from the point of view of scientific knowledge. It might appear that there are no essential methodological differences between astronomy and economics: scientists in both fields attempt to discover laws of general acceptability for a circumscribed group of phenomena in order to make the interconnection of these phenomena as clearly understandable as possible. But in reality such methodological differences do exist. The discovery of general laws in the field of economics is made difficult by the circumstance that observed economic phenomena are often affected by many factors which are very hard to evaluate separately. In addition, the experience which has accumulated since the beginning of the so-called civilized period of human history has—as is well known—been largely influenced and limited by causes which are by no means exclusively economic in nature. For example, most of the major states of history owed their existence to conquest. The conquering peoples established themselves, legally and economically, as the privileged class of the conquered country. They seized for themselves a monopoly of the land ownership and appointed a priesthood from among their own ranks. The priests, in control of education, made the class division of society into a permanent institution and created a system of values by which the people were thenceforth, to a large extent unconsciously, guided in their social behavior.

But historic tradition is, so to speak, of yesterday; nowhere have we really overcome what Thorstein Veblen called “the predatory phase” of human development. The observable economic facts belong to that phase and even such laws as we can derive from them are not applicable to other phases. Since the real purpose of socialism is precisely to overcome and advance beyond the predatory phase of human development, economic science in its present state can throw little light on the socialist society of the future.

Second, socialism is directed towards a social-ethical end. Science, however, cannot create ends and, even less, instill them in human beings; science, at most, can supply the means by which to attain certain ends. But the ends themselves are conceived by personalities with lofty ethical ideals and—if these ends are not stillborn, but vital and vigorous—are adopted and carried forward by those many human beings who, half unconsciously, determine the slow evolution of society.

For these reasons, we should be on our guard not to overestimate science and scientific methods when it is a question of human problems; and we should not assume that experts are the only ones who have a right to express themselves on questions affecting the organization of society.

Innumerable voices have been asserting for some time now that human society is passing through a crisis, that its stability has been gravely shattered. It is characteristic of such a situation that individuals feel indifferent or even hostile toward the group, small or large, to which they belong. In order to illustrate my meaning, let me record here a personal experience. I recently discussed with an intelligent and well-disposed man the threat of another war, which in my opinion would seriously endanger the existence of mankind, and I remarked that only a supra-national organization would offer protection from that danger. Thereupon my visitor, very calmly and coolly, said to me: “Why are you so deeply opposed to the disappearance of the human race?”

I am sure that as little as a century ago no one would have so lightly made a statement of this kind. It is the statement of a man who has striven in vain to attain an equilibrium within himself and has more or less lost hope of succeeding. It is the expression of a painful solitude and isolation from which so many people are suffering in these days. What is the cause? Is there a way out?

It is easy to raise such questions, but difficult to answer them with any degree of assurance. I must try, however, as best I can, although I am very conscious of the fact that our feelings and strivings are often contradictory and obscure and that they cannot be expressed in easy and simple formulas.

Man is, at one and the same time, a solitary being and a social being. As a solitary being, he attempts to protect his own existence and that of those who are closest to him, to satisfy his personal desires, and to develop his innate abilities. As a social being, he seeks to gain the recognition and affection of his fellow human beings, to share in their pleasures, to comfort them in their sorrows, and to improve their conditions of life. Only the existence of these varied, frequently conflicting, strivings accounts for the special character of a man, and their specific combination determines the extent to which an individual can achieve an inner equilibrium and can contribute to the well-being of society. It is quite possible that the relative strength of these two drives is, in the main, fixed by inheritance. But the personality that finally emerges is largely formed by the environment in which a man happens to find himself during his development, by the structure of the society in which he grows up, by the tradition of that society, and by its appraisal of particular types of behavior. The abstract concept “society” means to the individual human being the sum total of his direct and indirect relations to his contemporaries and to all the people of earlier generations. The individual is able to think, feel, strive, and work by himself; but he depends so much upon society—in his physical, intellectual, and emotional existence—that it is impossible to think of him, or to understand him, outside the framework of society. It is “society” which provides man with food, clothing, a home, the tools of work, language, the forms of thought, and most of the content of thought; his life is made possible through the labor and the accomplishments of the many millions past and present who are all hidden behind the small word ‘society.’

It is evident, therefore, that the dependence of the individual upon society is a fact of nature which cannot be abolished—just as in the case of ants and bees. However, while the whole life process of ants and bees is fixed down to the smallest detail by rigid, hereditary instincts, the social pattern and interrelationships of human beings are very variable and susceptible to change. Memory, the capacity to make new combinations, the gift of oral communication have made possible developments among human being which are not dictated by biological necessities. Such developments manifest themselves in traditions, institutions, and organizations; in literature; in scientific and engineering accomplishments; in works of art. This explains how it happens that, in a certain sense, man can influence his life through his own conduct, and that in this process conscious thinking and wanting can play a part.

Man acquires at birth, through heredity, a biological constitution which we must consider fixed and unalterable, including the natural urges which are characteristic of the human species. In addition, during his lifetime, he acquires a cultural constitution which he adopts from society through communication and through many other types of influences. It is this cultural constitution which, with the passage of time, is subject to change and which determines to a very large extent the relationship between the individual and society. Modern anthropology has taught us, through comparative investigation of so-called primitive cultures, that the social behavior of human beings may differ greatly, depending upon prevailing cultural patterns and the types of organization which predominate in society. It is on this that those who are striving to improve the lot of man may ground their hopes: human beings are not condemned, because of their biological constitution, to annihilate each other or to be at the mercy of a cruel, self-inflicted fate.

If we ask ourselves how the structure of society and the cultural attitude of man should be changed in order to make human life as satisfying as possible, we should constantly be conscious of the fact that there are certain conditions which we are unable to modify. As mentioned before, the biological nature of man is, for all practical purposes, not subject to change. Furthermore, technological and demographic developments of the last few centuries have created conditions which are here to stay. In relatively densely settled populations with the goods which are indispensable to their continued existence, an extreme division of labor and a highly-centralized productive apparatus are absolutely necessary. The time—which, looking back, seems so idyllic—is gone forever when individuals or relatively small groups could be completely self-sufficient. It is only a slight exaggeration to say that mankind constitutes even now a planetary community of production and consumption.

I have now reached the point where I may indicate briefly what to me constitutes the essence of the crisis of our time. It concerns the relationship of the individual to society. The individual has become more conscious than ever of his dependence upon society. But he does not experience this dependence as a positive asset, as an organic tie, as a protective force, but rather as a threat to his natural rights, or even to his economic existence. Moreover, his position in society is such that the egotistical drives of his make-up are constantly being accentuated, while his social drives, which are by nature weaker, progressively deteriorate. All human beings, whatever their position in society, are suffering from this process of deterioration. Unknowingly prisoners of their own egotism, they feel insecure, lonely, and deprived of the naive, simple, and unsophisticated enjoyment of life. Man can find meaning in life, short and perilous as it is, only through devoting himself to society.

The economic anarchy of capitalist society as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of the evil. We see before us a huge community of producers the members of which are unceasingly striving to deprive each other of the fruits of their collective labor—not by force, but on the whole in faithful compliance with legally established rules. In this respect, it is important to realize that the means of production—that is to say, the entire productive capacity that is needed for producing consumer goods as well as additional capital goods—may legally be, and for the most part are, the private property of individuals.

For the sake of simplicity, in the discussion that follows I shall call ‘workers’ all those who do not share in the ownership of the means of production—although this does not quite correspond to the customary use of the term. The owner of the means of production is in a position to purchase the labor power of the worker. By using the means of production, the worker produces new goods which become the property of the capitalist. The essential point about this process is the relation between what the worker produces and what he is paid, both measured in terms of real value. Insofar as the labor contract is ‘free,’ what the worker receives is determined not by the real value of the goods he produces, but by his minimum needs and by the capitalists’ requirements for labor power in relation to the number of workers competing for jobs. It is important to understand that even in theory the payment of the worker is not determined by the value of his product.

Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones. The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society. This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature. The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population. Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education). It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights.

The situation prevailing in an economy based on the private ownership of capital is thus characterized by two main principles: first, means of production (capital) are privately owned and the owners dispose of them as they see fit; second, the labor contract is free. Of course, there is no such thing as a pure capitalist society in this sense. In particular, it should be noted that the workers, through long and bitter political struggles, have succeeded in securing a somewhat improved form of the ‘free labor contract’ for certain categories of workers. But taken as a whole, the present day economy does not differ much from ‘pure’ capitalism.

Production is carried on for profit, not for use. There is no provision that all those able and willing to work will always be in a position to find employment; an ‘army of unemployed’ almost always exists. The worker is constantly in fear of losing his job. Since unemployed and poorly paid workers do not provide a profitable market, the production of consumers’ goods is restricted, and great hardship is the consequence. Technological progress frequently results in more unemployment rather than in an easing of the burden of work for all. The profit motive, in conjunction with competition among capitalists, is responsible for an instability in the accumulation and utilization of capital which leads to increasingly severe depressions. Unlimited competition leads to a huge waste of labor, and to that crippling of the social consciousness of individuals which I mentioned before.

This crippling of individuals I consider the worst evil of capitalism. Our whole educational system suffers from this evil. An exaggerated competitive attitude is inculcated into the student, who is trained to worship acquisitive success as a preparation for his future career.

I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society.

Nevertheless, it is necessary to remember that a planned economy is not yet socialism. A planned economy as such may be accompanied by the complete enslavement of the individual. The achievement of socialism requires the solution of some extremely difficult socio-political problems: how is it possible, in view of the far-reaching centralization of political and economic power, to prevent bureaucracy from becoming all-powerful and overweening? How can the rights of the individual be protected and therewith a democratic counterweight to the power of bureaucracy be assured?

Clarity about the aims and problems of socialism is of greatest significance in our age of transition. Since, under present circumstances, free and unhindered discussion of these problems has come under a powerful taboo, I consider the foundation of this magazine to be an important public service.

42 comments on “Why Socialism? – Albert Einstein ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. lprent 1
    24 July 2010 at 7:51 am

    Excellent. Rings as true now as it did 60 years ago in the rubble left by depression and war.

    • ZB 1.1
      24 July 2010 at 8:27 am

      Wait, does it. What would Einstein say about the internet as a means to educate the masses and avoid the private elites controlling mass knowledge. Sure, he’d say stop paying for Sky TV. But would he also point out that we now can educate everyone how utterly reliant they are on everyone else. My kettle was built in China! Yeah, China! China is a socialist run capitalist country. Its dealt with famine, desertification, its buying up massive iron ore and other resources, no western government could do that without the shrinks and howls of private business demanding government hands off. The simple fact is a government that works for the people, like China, will have a competive advantage, and the countries like the US, UK, OZ, NZ, EU countries, where the government is beholdant to private interests, limited by their needs over the needs of their populations won’t. As National put so well, tax cuts for the rich and tax hikes for the many, and its insulting ‘above $50 dollars’ a week. What we need is government that isn’t so excessively interested in business needs and wants, rather we need a government that isn’t, so that it can insure a working economy that business can thrive in. At the moment government policies in western nations have left businesses and citizen under water. Thirty years of Reagan, Thatcher, Rogernomics stupid economics of help business, business will save us, pushing business to aggressively compete with each other has led to the collapse of balance sheets, stock markets and a huge social, economic and environmental mismatch. I’d just like to say to every neo-Conservative, you complete and utter plonkers, you serious deluded bunch of self opinionated egotistical shi-ts, too much greed is worse that too little.

      • michaeljsavage 1.1.1
        24 July 2010 at 12:23 pm

        China is not a socialist country … it is built on the stalinist model as a foundation complete with repression of all kinds. China as a Government works on a xenophobic basis for its own cultural worldview – a Ruling elite calls the shots and now includes several of their new economic aristocracy – its “people” are just a means to an end – not the focus of its policies. China has a competitive advantage because it has built itself on the basis of having an industrial base built on low wages and virtual slave labour. Now they have to become rabid imperialists extending influence and hegemony to satisfy the populace’ desire for higher incomes and opportunity and keep the masses docile.

        This is where the next war is coming from.

        China is not socialist – it is building an empire of conquest .. it started with the illegal invasion of Tibet. It also includes colonisation by exporting its populace, capital and cultural ‘pull’ on ethnic chinese living in other countries among other tactics.

        • ZB 1.1.1.1
          26 July 2010 at 3:03 pm

          China is no worse than the US, the US has supported dictators, suspended habis… etc.

          Look China is a capitalist economy run by Communists. The US is a capitalist
          economy run by private capitalists. China is not in debt over its head, has no problem
          spending billions on deserts and wind farms, and really has a problem if it fails.
          The masses of Chinese will throw out their fat hair red behinds.

          So get a grip, Tibet was always going to be abused, its resource rich nation would have
          come under huge pressure from the West had it broken free from China.

          The problem is not left or right. Its we’re all fraked if we continue the oppression of
          Mother Earth. And no I’m not saying for Mother Earth’s sake, I’m saying for my fat
          hair green behind.

        • jack 1.1.1.2
          8 August 2010 at 2:54 am

          “”China has a competitive advantage because it has built itself on the basis of having an industrial base built on low wages and virtual slave labour. Now they have to become rabid imperialists extending influence and hegemony to satisfy the populace’ desire for higher incomes and opportunity and keep the masses docile.””

          hi mate, quite right, the desire for higher income are a result of inflation and the first few that got rich..

          The big war would be Currency War, not actual real gun-powder war … WW3 won’t happen so soon, as the world is too much diversified and bankers in EU can no longer start a war, as US can’t fight a double sided war (war on china and war within US) it’s not possible.

          Can only happen if a nuke exploded in US or China, which I see have very little chance.

          War can only happen if masses are supporting it, I see masses but no logical reason for masses to giveup their lives.

  2. burt 2
    24 July 2010 at 9:27 am

    People who fail to lear from the mistakes of the past…..

  3. ak 3
    24 July 2010 at 12:05 pm

    …….often attempt retrospective invalidation of great minds.

  4. coolas 4
    24 July 2010 at 1:39 pm

    Thanks for the link

    ‘Since the real purpose of socialism is precisely to overcome and advance beyond the predatory phase of human development …’

    How relevant is that!

    Here we have a predatory arch Capitalist leading a bunch of vandals with such hunter food gatherer mentality they wanted to dig up our most precious land.

    Einstein’s warning of ‘seriously endanger(ing) the existence of mankind’ has come to pass and his friend’s question, ‘Why are you so deeply opposed to the disappearance of the human race?’ is as shocking now. as it was then.

  5. Justin 5
    24 July 2010 at 1:51 pm

    The experiments of centrally planned economies over the past century have been abject failures.

    Look at Cuba for a start, Cuba produced 7 million tons of sugar in 1952. In 2009, it’s 1.5 million tons. Average monthly wage of $15 a month. Lets not forget the failure of the centrally planned economies of Eastern Europe. Or in New Zealand the terribly inefficient state owned enterprises of the 80s. And the bureaucracy of that era, high prices, inefficient subsidised industry and Muldoon’s socialist Think Big.

    The highly advanced capitalist economies based on private enterprise, are able to afford the most well developed social welfare and health care systems. The huge reduction in poverty in a country such as China, can be directly connected to the the flourishing of private business and competition. Sure capitalism is not perfect, and there are serious issues.

    But at the end of the day, socialism as a form of structuring society and economies, has failed.

    The debate now has moved past socialism vs capitalism.

    What then is more important is how we allocate the resources and structure modern capitalist economy.

    Do we follow the American model or a more welfare based Northern European model of capitalism? How do we place workers rights within capitalism? What is the role of the state?

    It would be interesting to see what Einstein’s views would be today.

    • ZB 5.1
      24 July 2010 at 3:40 pm

      Einstein was not a communist. Blair was the leader of the Socialist Labour party of the UK.
      Can some please explain to the hard of hearing that Social movements have made the west
      strong and vibrant and its only with the union bashing of the 70s that the financial
      party took over and crashed capitalism!

      • Bill 5.1.1
        24 July 2010 at 5:03 pm

        Einstein might not have been a communist, although he willingly and voluntarily defended communists and anarchists who were being persecuted during the McCarthy years and I’d suggest he was closer to both those political philosophies than he was to any ‘third way’ pap as perpetrated by Blair and the British Labour Party among others.

        edit. I know you guys are busy with important stuff and all, and all. But when you have a moment…..moderation release please?

        • jimmy 5.1.1.1
          24 July 2010 at 5:45 pm

          Im no third way fan and nor would I want to attach Einstein with it but this pasage reminded me of Giddens

          “As a social being, he seeks to gain the recognition and affection of his fellow human beings.”

          Excelent post ‘the standard’, Einstein’s the man.

    • Bill 5.2
      24 July 2010 at 4:38 pm

      Justin, you are wildly wrong on a number of points there and misled (or deliberately misleading?) on others.

      Before I go on, I’m not an advocate of central planning and have never had any time for state socialism or soviet style socialism or whatever label you might want to place on it. Just so that you know.

      Yes, command and control economies collapsed. But have you bothered to ask yourself why they collapsed. Was it the central planning that was at fault or was it the wider context within which central planning tried to maintain itself that ensured their demise?

      “Cuba produced 7 million tons of sugar in 1952. In 2009, it’s 1.5 million tons.”

      So what? Where did Cuba export its sugar to in 1952 and does that market still exist?

      “Average monthly wage of $15 a month.”

      So what? If $15 per month is enough to live off in Cuba, then fine. Maybe $15 per month is better than $1000 per month that beneficiaries get in NZ.

      “The highly advanced capitalist economies based on private enterprise, are able to afford the most well developed social welfare and health care systems.”

      So why are the health outcomes of the most highly advanced capitalist economy way behind those of Cuba?

      “The huge reduction in poverty in a country such as China,…”

      What reduction in poverty? Poverty is relative. And the introduction of the market to China has introduced a massive disparity in incomes, ie has created poverty.

      “socialism as a form of structuring society and economies, has failed.”

      Yup. Nobody who should be taken seriously either defends nor advocates the type of socialism you are referring to. Most would say that the forms of organisation you are referring to were never socialist, but were rather simple hierarchical structures designed to favour the elites in the higher echelons of the hierarchy and that the term ‘socialism’ was an available and convenient fig leaf that they were able to appropriate and use in much the same way as our elites have appropriated and use the term ‘democracy’.

      And it is not ‘the end of history’. There is no worthwhile debate about how to produce and allocate resources within a capitalist economy. That’s simply a question of how much regulation is applied to the market. Where workers rights place in a capitalist context is entirely down to the power that workers can or choose to exercise. And the role of the state is the same as it always has been. To manage everything in such a way that the market enjoys primacy in all of our lives.

      Why would it be interesting to see Einstein’s views today? The views he espoused at the time were standard socialist fare and contingent upon a particular place in time. As then, so now. Read some half decent contemporary literature concerned with alternatives to Capitalism and the market and you will be reading something fairly close to what Einstein would say today.

      You might not have noticed, but three of the last four paragraphs of the Einstein’s article were devoted to signposting the problem of central planning and the dictatorship of the ‘red bureaucracy’ as Bakunin termed it.

      “…it is necessary to remember that a planned economy is not yet socialism. A planned economy as such may be accompanied by the complete enslavement of the individual. The achievement of socialism requires the solution of some extremely difficult socio-political problems: how is it possible, in view of the far-reaching centralization of political and economic power, to prevent bureaucracy from becoming all-powerful and overweening? How can the rights of the individual be protected and therewith a democratic counterweight to the power of bureaucracy be assured?”

    • Draco T Bastard 5.3
      24 July 2010 at 5:20 pm

      Cuba produced 7 million tons of sugar in 1952. In 2009, it’s 1.5 million tons.

      And that proves what besides the fact that they’ve been under massive economic sanction since throwing out the USAs sponsored dictators?

      Average monthly wage of $15 a month.

      And what’s that in Purchasing Power Parity? I’ll give an example: Asthma medication in the US ~$50, same medicine in Cuba ~5 cents.

      The highly advanced capitalist economies based on private enterprise,

      Not a single high tech “capitalist” economy got there through private enterprise but through state support. We know this as the exact opposite (NZ’s economy has collapsed) has happened in NZ since Rogernomics was instituted.

      But at the end of the day, socialism as a form of structuring society and economies, has failed.

      Actually, it’s never been tried. USSR = State Capitalist, China = State Capitalist, North Korea = State Capitalist. Every socio-economic failure of the past century, including the Great Depression and the present Great Recession, has been the failure of capitalism. Some “capitalist” states have done slightly better but that’s because of their mild socialist leanings.

    • RedLogix 5.4
      25 July 2010 at 10:33 am

      The Spirit Level makes an interesting reference to Cuba somewhere in one of it’s later chapters. In the course of the book it makes a case for proposing a certain maximum GINI (Gross Index of National Inequality) beyond which societies become discoherent and over the long term, unsustainable social environments for humans to live.

      Also we know that highly industrialised nations tend to have carbon/resource footprints that are in the long-term environmentally unsustainable, while poorer nations consume far less per capita.

      Curiously enough Cuba is the only nation that meets the criteria for BOTH social and environmental long-term sustainability.

      The argument does claim that this makes Cuba some kind of utopian paradise on earth…. but it does suggest that what we define as ‘successes’ in the modern world are for the main part… short-term mirages.

    • mcflock 5.5
      26 July 2010 at 2:42 pm

      actually, a Cuban Friendship Society speaker recently reckoned that at the time of the revolution Cuba imported almost all its food, producing sugar to be exported at minimal Brownlee mining royalties prices.

      Apparently the goal is to be entirely self sufficient in food, rather than importing from the other side of the planet because the US boycotts folk who don’t boycott Cuba.

      So yeah, Cubans export less sugar to the West. Now they grow their own food (organically, apparently).

      • Gosman 5.5.1
        26 July 2010 at 11:34 pm

        Wow – organically eh? So I guess they haven’t bothered reading the science on that subject either.

        Great to see the Socialists holding up the totalitarian state of Cuba as a viable model to follow. What next – Zimbabwe?

        LOL!

        • loota 5.5.1.1
          26 July 2010 at 11:44 pm

          Well, in Cuba they live as long and as happily as anywhere else in the western world – for a fraction of the health spend. And cuban salsa is a great past time.

          Ummmmmm your Zimbabwe example is a bit disingenuous Gosman, life expectancy and per capita income in that country is going down the toilet – nothing like the Cuban situation.

  6. Jum 6
    25 July 2010 at 1:26 am

    The best lesson we can learn in life and death is that if humanity fails to survive it really does not ‘matter’. That is the best leveller of all.

  7. jbanks 7
    26 July 2010 at 10:59 am

    Not surprised. Einstein did get quite loony towards the end.

    • mcflock 7.1
      26 July 2010 at 2:47 pm

      Blown anyone away with your stunning intellect lately, jb?

      meh – when a tory demonstrates any mental ability beyond an 80 IQ, I might start to lend credence to their definition of sanity.

      • jbanks 7.1.1
        26 July 2010 at 3:37 pm

        Don’t feel bad, you’re not alone. Frauds and Quacks are always digging up bullshit appeals to authority, either outright fabricating quotes that they attribute to invariably Einstein or “a respected Nobel Laureate” or stumbling on one that has gone a bit loopy in his dotage.

        • mcflock 7.1.1.1
          26 July 2010 at 5:59 pm

          Of course, frauds and quacks can also use gross generalisations and unspecified references to fabrication in order to indirectly discredit precise and accurate quotes/data. And when all’s said and done, if somebody of noted intelligence (even genius) disagrees with with them they can always allege senility.

          Even in his “dotage” (if it ever impacted him significantly), my bet is that Einstein could still have beaten you soundly in logic, political philosophy and economics (note, of course, that physics requires expertise in logic and advanced mathematics, logic is required for political philosophy, and maths is essential for economics, although tory economics can do without logic and frequently maths).

          But keep telling us how you know better than Einstein in *any* field.

          • jbanks 7.1.1.1.1
            26 July 2010 at 8:10 pm

            Hahaha.

            You know you’re desperate when your claim to fame is a 60yr old article from a guy who was no longer capable of constructive contributions to physics. If he only bothered to study some sound economics, then perhaps he never would have written this intellectually shameful essay.

            [lprent: I see that you have the same level of understanding as your namesake. Economics resembles reading chicken entrails for insights more than it resembles a science. Probably why so many wingnuts think that they can understand it. ]

            • Gosman 7.1.1.1.1.1
              26 July 2010 at 11:32 pm

              Actually, if you read Freakonomics or Superfreakonomics you will see that Economics has quite a lot to do with Science, especially in the use of statistical anlysis to confirm validity of hypothesis.

            • McFlock 7.1.1.1.1.2
              26 July 2010 at 11:43 pm

              “from a guy who was no longer capable of constructive contributions to physics.”

              riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. I won’t take your word for it.

              For your next trick you’ll suggest he was on drugs or buggered farm animals in his later years?

  8. Kleefer 8
    26 July 2010 at 11:13 pm

    Einstein was a smart guy but boy, his economic knowledge was rubbish (not really surprising when he was a scientist not an economist).

    He ignores (or is simply unaware of) time preference, capital structure, the price system, the role of the entrepreneur and the capitalist in allocating scarce resources, basically everything one needs to know to understand fully why socialism is a stupid and extremely dangerous idea.

    For a better explanation read George Reisman’s essay “Why Nazism was socialism and socialism is totalitarianism” rather than this wet drivel.

    • McFlock 8.1
      26 July 2010 at 11:46 pm

      “not really surprising when he was a scientist not an economist”

      all note the admission that economics is not a science and that a thorough knowledge of the scientific method cannot enable any understanding of economics…

      • loota 8.1.1
        26 July 2010 at 11:58 pm

        Nice job McFlock.

        Sounded like Kleefer was about to tell us that Gandhi, the Nazis and Stalin were all on the same side.

        It is comorting to know how all these NACT supporters are so familiar with the limits of Einstein’s intellect 🙄

  9. jbanks 9
    27 July 2010 at 9:00 am

    lprent said: “Economics resembles reading chicken entrails for insights more than it resembles a science.”

    Ok, you said it. Then why would a theoretical physicist have any authority on the subject of economics then?

    Like I said, you guys are all “Einstein promoted socialism! he’s a Genius so haha we win” /fail

    How ironic that anyone who’s not a climatologist has an opinion on Global Warming, you’ll have a good cry about that.

    • loota 9.1
      27 July 2010 at 9:08 am

      Don’t consider Einstein just a theoretical physicist. Consider him one of the most intelligent and insightful people who has walked the planet and who thought more deeply about the workings of nature than either you or I have probably done.

      And certainly smarter than most peer published economists.

      • jbanks 9.1.1
        27 July 2010 at 9:31 am

        “And certainly smarter than most peer published economists.”

        Unless they supported socialism in the context of the 1940’s too right?

    • lprent 9.2
      27 July 2010 at 10:53 am

      E probably had no more knowledge than any other intelligent educated person of the time (awareness of economics was barely out of the fetus stage in 1949). On the other hand he was intelligent and observant of his society. He’d weathered at least two depressions and he was able to comment intelligently. Furthermore he was commenting largely on observed social patterns during his lifetime when he was talking about socialism rather than using some half-arsed theoretical model that doesn’t bear that much relationship to chaotic reality.

      Somehow I think that you fail on all counts as being someone worth listening to based on your comments here.

      I’ll listen to E

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Anzac Commemorative Address – Dawn Service, Gallipoli, Türkiye
    Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia.   Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 hour ago

  • PM announces changes to portfolios
    Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • New catch limits for unique fishery areas
    Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Minister welcomes hydrogen milestone
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Urgent changes to system through first RMA Amendment Bill
    The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Overseas decommissioning models considered
    Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Release of North Island Severe Weather Event Inquiry
    Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Justice Minister to attend Human Rights Council
    Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order.  “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Patterson reopens world’s largest wool scouring facility
    Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Speech to the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective Summit, 18 April 2024
    Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing  At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin    Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho    Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today.    I am delighted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Government to introduce revised Three Strikes law
    The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • New diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions.   “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says.    “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Humanitarian support for Ethiopia and Somalia
    New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today.   “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Arts Minister congratulates Mataaho Collective
    Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale.  “It is good ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Supporting better financial outcomes for Kiwis
    The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Trade relationship with China remains strong
    “China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says.   Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • PM’s South East Asia mission does the business
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • $41m to support clean energy in South East Asia
    New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Minister releases Fast-track stakeholder list
    The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Judicial appointments announced
    Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Education Minister heads to major teaching summit in Singapore
    Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa.  The summit is co-hosted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Value of stopbank project proven during cyclone
    A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Anzac commemorations, Türkiye relationship focus of visit
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul.    “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Minister to Europe for OECD meeting, Anzac Day
    Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Comprehensive Partnership the goal for NZ and the Philippines
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr.  The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • Government commits $20m to Westport flood protection
    The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • Taupō takes pole position
    The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Cost of living support for low-income homeowners
    Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners.  “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government backing mussel spat project
    The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government focused on getting people into work
    Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Clean energy key driver to reducing emissions
    The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Earthquake-prone buildings review brought forward
    The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Thailand and NZ to agree to Strategic Partnership
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government consults on extending coastal permits for ports
    RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Inflation coming down, but more work to do
    Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • School attendance restored as a priority in health advice
    Refreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Unnecessary bureaucracy cut in oceans sector
    Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Patterson promoting NZ’s wool sector at International Congress
    Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson is speaking at the International Wool Textile Organisation Congress in Adelaide, promoting New Zealand wool, and outlining the coalition Government’s support for the revitalisation the sector.    "New Zealand’s wool exports reached $400 million in the year to 30 June 2023, and the coalition Government ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Removing red tape to help early learners thrive
    The Government is making legislative changes to make it easier for new early learning services to be established, and for existing services to operate, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. The changes involve repealing the network approval provisions that apply when someone wants to establish a new early learning service, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • RMA changes to cut coal mining consent red tape
    Changes to the Resource Management Act will align consenting for coal mining to other forms of mining to reduce barriers that are holding back economic development, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The inconsistent treatment of coal mining compared with other extractive activities is burdensome red tape that fails to acknowledge ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-04-25T03:42:08+00:00