Written By:
eugenedoyle - Date published:
11:09 am, June 2nd, 2025 - 29 comments
Categories: child welfare, disaster, gaza, genocide, israel, journalism, Long Read, Media, media abuse, news, Palestine, Peace, Zionism -
Tags:
I want to share a writer’s journey – of living and writing through the Genocide. Where I live and how I live could not be further from the horror playing out in Gaza and, increasingly, on the West Bank. Yet, because my country provides military, intelligence and diplomatic support to Israel and the US, I feel compelled to answer the call to support Palestine by doing the one thing I know best: writing.
I am one of the blessed of the earth. I’m surrounded by similarly fortunate people. I live in a heart-stoppingly beautiful bay. Even in winter I swim in the marine reserve across the road from our house. Seals, Orca, all sorts of fish, octopus, penguins and countless other marine life so often draw me from my desk towards the rocky shore. My home is on the Wild South Coast of Wellington. Every few days our local Whatsapp group fires a message, for example: “Big pod of dolphins heading into the bay!”
I am surrounded by good friends and suffer no fears for my security. I am materially comfortable and well-fed. I love being a writer. Who could ask for more?
I write, on average, a 1200-word article per week. It’s a seven days a week task and most of my writing time is spent reading, scouring news sites from around the world, note-taking, fact-checking, fretting, talking to people and thinking about the story that will emerge, always so different from my starting concept. I’m in regular contact with historians, ex-diplomats, geopolitical analysts, writers and activists from around the world and count myself fortunate to know these exceptional people.
This article is different, simpler; it is personal – one person’s experience of writing from the far periphery of the conflict.
I don’t want to live in a country that turns a blind or a sleep-laden eye to one of the great crimes against humanity. I have come to the hurtful realization that I have a very different worldview from most people I know and from most people I thought I knew.
Fortunately, I have old friends who share in this struggle and I have made many new friends here in New Zealand and across the world who follow their own burning hearts and work every day to challenge the role our governments play in supporting Israel to destroy the lives of millions of innocent people. To me, these people – and above all the Palestinian people in their steadfast resistance – are the heroes who fuel my life.
Most of us have multiple demands on our time; three of my good writer friends are grappling with cancer, another lost his job for challenging the official line and now must work long hours in a menial day job to keep the family afloat. Despite these challenges they all head to the keyboard to continue the struggle. Writing is fighting.
There’s so little we can all do but, as Māori people say: “ahakoa he iti, he pounamu” – it may only be a little but every bit counts, every bit is as precious as jade.
That sentiment is how movements for change have been built – anti-Vietnam war, anti-nuclear, anti-Apartheid – all of them pro-humanity, all of them about standing with the victims not with the oppressors, nor on the sideline muttering platitudes and excuses. As another writer said: “Washing one’s hands of the struggle between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral.” (Paolo Freire.) Back to the keyboard.
My life until October 7th was more focused on environmental issues, community organisation and water politics. I had ceased being “a writer” years ago.
One day in October 2023 I was in the kitchen, ranting about what was being done to the Palestinians and what was obviously about to be done to the Palestinians: genocide. My emotions were high because I had had a deeply unpleasant exchange with a good friend of mine on the golf course (yes, I play golf). He told me that the people of Gaza deserved to be collectively punished for the Hamas attack of October 7th. I had angrily shot back at him, correctly but not diplomatically, that this put him shoulder-to-shoulder with the Nazis and all those who imposed collective punishment on civilian populations. My wife, to her credit, had heard enough: “Get upstairs and write an article! You have to start writing!” It changed my life. She was right, of course. Impotent rage and parlour-room speeches achieve nothing. Writing is fighting.
My first article “40 Beheaded Babies Survived the Hamas Attack” was a warning drawn from history about narratives and what the Americans and Israelis were really softening the ground for. Since then I have had about 70 articles published, all in Australia and New Zealand, some in China, the USA, throughout Asia Pacific, Europe and on all sorts of email databases, including those sent out by the exemplary Ambassador Chas Freeman in the US and another by my good friend and human rights lawyer J V Whitbeck in Paris. All my articles are on my own site solidarity.co.nz.
As with historians, part of a writer’s job is to spot patterns and recurrent themes in stories, to detect lies and expose deeper agendas in the official narratives. The mainstream media is surprisingly bad at this. Or chooses to be.
Just like the Incubator Babies story in Iraq, the Gulf of Tonkin Incident in Vietnam, reaching right back to the sinking of the USS Maine in Havana in 1898, propaganda is often used as a prelude to atrocities. The blizzard of lies after October 7th were designed to be-monster the Palestinians and prepare the ground for what would obviously follow. The narrative of beheaded babies promoted by world leaders including President Biden was powerfully amplified by our mainstream media; journalists at the highest level of the trade spread the lies. I have to tell you, it was frightening in October 2023 to challenge these narratives. Every day I pored through the Israeli news site Haaretz for updates. Eventually the narrative fell apart – but by then the damage was done. Thousands of real babies had been murdered by the Israelis.
Following events in Palestine closely, it still comes as a shock when a journalist I have read, seen, heard is suddenly killed by the Israelis. This has happened several times. When it does I take a coffee and walk up the ridiculously steep track behind my house and sit high above the bay on a bench seat I built (badly). That bench is my “top office” where I like to chew thoughts in my mind as I see the cold waves break on the brown rocks below. High up there I feel detached and better able to ask and answer the questions I need to process in my writing.
Why does our media pay little attention to the killing of so many fellow writers? Why don’t they call out the Israelis for having killed more journalists than any military machine in history? Why the silence around Israel’s “Where’s Daddy?” killing programme that has silenced so many Palestinian journalists and doctors by tracking their mobile phones and striking with a missile just when they arrive back home to their families? Why does “the world’s most moral army” commit such ugly crimes? Where’s the solidarity with our fellow journalists?
Is it because their skin is mainly dark? Is that why, according to Radio New Zealand’s own report on its Gaza coverage, New Zealanders have more in common with Israelis than we do with Palestinians? RNZ refers to this as our “proximity” to Israelis. They’re right, of course: by failing to shoulder our positive duty to act decisively against Israel and the U.S. we show that we share values with people committing genocide.
Is this why stories about our own region – Kanaky/New Caledonia, Papua New Guinea, the Marshall Islands and so on, get so little coverage? I have heard many times the immense frustration of journalists I know who work on Pacific issues. The answer is simple: we have greater “proximity” to Benjamin Netanyahu than we do to the Polynesians or Melanesians in our own backyard. Really? Such questions need answers. Back to the keyboard.
I try not to permit myself despair. It’s a privilege we shouldn’t allow ourselves while our government supports the genocide. Sometimes that’s hard. There’s a photo I’ve seen of a Palestinian mother holding her daughter that haunts me. In traditional thobe, her head covered by her simple robe, she could easily be Mary, mother of Jesus. She stares straight at the camera. Her expression is hard to read. Shock? Disbelief? Wounded humanity? Blood flows from below her eyes and stains her cheek and chin. Her forehead is blackened, probably from an explosive blast. She holds her child, a girl of perhaps 10, also damaged and blackened from the Israeli attack. The child is asleep or unconscious; I can’t tell which. The mother holds her as lovingly, as poignantly, as Mary did to Jesus when he came down from the cross. La Pietà in Gaza. Why do some of us care less about this pair? Where is our humanity that we can let this happen day after day until the last syllable of our sickening rhetoric that somehow we in the West are morally superior has been vomited out.
I’ll give the last word to another writer:
“Verily I say unto you, in as much as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.”
Eugene Doyle
Eugene Doyle is a writer based in Wellington. He has written extensively on the Middle East, as well as peace and security issues in the Asia Pacific region. He hosts the public policy platform solidarity.co.nz.
It is so hard to watch and be aware of and it's getting worse. The situation for people in Gaza is getting much worse and no-one appears slightly interested in stopping it.
How does this happen? Is this why we have domestic violence within our societies – because we don't step in to protect a captive population – a family – from being severely damaged by indiscriminate cruelty.
Are we too scared? Or do we enjoy it at some level – witnessing the unrelenting brutality against un-armed civilians? Is it a survival skill to be able to partition off one segment of our humanity to mitigate the trauma of what we can see?
It's happening every day as we get up and go about our lives – figuratively, right there next to us children are starving to death. Never mind – no big deal – what's on Netflix?
The photo's of WW2 soldiers finding concentration camps and the skeletal bodies and gaunt faces of the prisoners seem eerily prescient.
It is damning!! Shameful and confronting. Yes we are afraid because Mossad does not take prisoners, and their ruthless attitudes have poisoned any humane response from many in Israel and worldwide.
Hamas have controlled and converted Palestinian people to hating Israel.
Both groups are extremists, and the conflict was inevitable as Israel refused to agree to a two state situation, and Hamas the same. If ever we needed a UN peace keeping force it is now. imo.
When the rich make money from any war fare and misery we should track the money imo.
If you wanted to write about "genocide," there are multiples going on at any given moment. The major current one is in Sudan, for example. Instead, you choose to slap the label "genocide" on a war because your preferred side is losing it, and write about that.
What you're doing here is called "stochastic terrorism," and it has real-world effects on the people it targets: Suspect charged with federal hate crime in attack on Colorado rally for Israeli hostages.
Sudan is regularly being used by Zionists to distract from the genocide in Gaza. It's really worrying.
If genocide is to be a vague, ill defined concept not to be applied, then stochastic terrorism (which is simply direct action) certainly is.
I'm not referring to Sudan to "distract from the genocide in Gaza," I'm referring to it to demonstrate that people referring to a "genocide" in Gaza are liars who are participating in stochastic terrorism. Feel free to stop participating.
sorry if I missed it, but I've been meaning to ask for a while why you don't consider what is happening in Gaza to be genocide.
Agree with the point about other genocides happening without us paying attention.
I see it from the reverse perspective, in that I don't understand why some people do consider the Gaza war to be a genocide.
In terms of genocide, Hamas fits the bill nicely. Has a charter that says Islam will eradicate Israel and the end times can only come when Muslims kill all the Jews, and when they get into Israel they go house to house or through a music festival executing people etc. They want the Jews dead or gone and they act on that to the extent possible.
In the Gaza war, the Israelis have gone to some trouble to kill as few civilians as possible given the constraints of urban combat, they target only enemy combatants to the extent possible, they facilitate aid to the enemy population etc. How is any of that a genocide? There's a war happening, for sure, against an opponent whose entire strategy is the influencing of international public opinion via dead civilians, which it deliberately ensures. But a genocide? Not seeing it.
Link?
There are Israeli political parties that want an eretz Israel and no Palestinian state, they support settler violence in the WB and the expulsion of Gaza Palestinians from the area.
And so does their Prime Minister.
And as for acts of violence and unarmed civilians, there was 1948.
This is the Hamas Charter of 2017
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/hamas-2017-document-full
The earlier Charter of 1988 was written before the Oslo Accords. Hamas was not part of the PLO that signed them with Israel.
As for the 1988 Charter, it is based on faith in ultimate Moslem victory, it quotes a hadith (supposedly from the prophet, as affirmed by a Persian scholar of the 9thC).
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/21st_century/hamas.asp
They modified the 1988 charter because it was counter-productive with Useful Idiots in western countries, yes. To know which charter reflects their actual beliefs, review the events of 7-10 October 2023.
It's probably a decent strategy to promote conspiratorial nonsense against your opponent while you steal their land settlement by settlement. Like the author of this post says,’propaganda precedes (and justifies) atrocities’.
And what of inviting North Gazan's home in February only to resume bombing them in March? Sounds like genocide to me.
Israel and its command are not sane people right now. I think they are using this false genocide meme as a shield and loads of people are climbing on board and pushing it.
"I think they are using this false genocide meme as a shield and loads of people are climbing on board and pushing it."
Oh look, you've inadvertently said something true their, albeit not about the people you were referring to.
Can't see how a civil war in Sudan has anything whatsoever to do with Israeli aggression in Gaza. The only reason anyone would bring is up is to minimise and distract from Israeli aggression in Gaza.
Same goes for calling people concerned about it, “liars”. It’s desperate.
Sure it can be argued that incitement to ethnic cleansing and deliberate starvation and destruction of homes (after people returned to them) is not genocide. But war crimes and crimes against humanity terms do apply.
Do you portray those on the ICC or ICJ who have concerns about what is happening in Gaza as also participating in "stochastic terrorism"?
Do you think this is what President Herzog was saying here?
https://www.timesofisrael.com/herzog-to-un-international-bodies-show-moral-bankruptcy-in-treatment-of-israel/
January 2024.
https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-gaza-genocide-icj-9b85d9be617ba38ef3047cd8f0aae26d
"Do you portray those on the ICC or ICJ who have concerns about what is happening in Gaza as also participating in "stochastic terrorism"?"
I assume some are just useful idiots, but it's likely some are participating in stochastic terrorism.
Gazans are experiencing "real-world effects" too. Bibi wants all the Palestinian pieces.
Gazans are feeling the real-world effects of having a government that started a war against a far more powerful nation and would rather they all die than that the government 'dishonour' itself with surrender. That's nothing to do with any characteristic or politician of the nation they started the war by attacking, it's to do with their own society.
And none of that has anything to do with the fact that this constant propaganda of genocide and baby-killing leads to exactly the same thing as the Chch mosques terrorist attack and for the same reason, only this time with Jews as the targets.
Re "real-world effects" and “Jews as targets“, the IDF is doing the lion's share of sub-human killing in Gaza. But yeah, I get how “this constant propaganda” could lead to poor outcomes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_genocide
No place is safe for Palestinians in Gaza.
You do know these stories are Hamas propaganda, right? And yes, having to engage in urban warfare against opponents who are happy when their own civilians are killed sucks. If you have some better alternative for destroying Hamas, the world's war colleges would love to hear from you.
Do you believe the brutality in this asymmetric conflict is all from one side?
Hard to know, given that Gaza can be hazardous to journalists’ health – but perhaps that's propaganda too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_journalists_in_the_Gaza_war
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misinformation_in_the_Gaza_war
Since you clearly agree with the punishment being dished out, why is this
"Gazans are feeling the real-world effects of having a government that started a war against a far more powerful nation and would rather they all die than that the government 'dishonour' itself with surrender. That's nothing to do with any characteristic or politician of the nation they started the war by attacking, it's to do with their own society."
not an endorsement of collective punishment.
A war isn't "punishment," it's a war. The government of Gaza can end this war at any time simply by laying down its weapons and surrendering, and has been able to end it at any point over the last 19 months. What I don't get is how so many people suddenly don't seem to understand what a war is.
That's an utterly pathetic and unconvincing attempt at sophistry.
Benjamin Netanyahu recently undermined your lie by rejecting a Gaza withdrawal agreement, put by Hamas negotiators (via Steve Witkoff), which both stated Hamas would give up all participation in governance of Gaza and return all remaining POWs. His counter proposal removed the Hamas governance withdrawal proposal entirely. This is clearly not an objective of the Israeli government (on top of replacing the Palestinian political leadership by force, amounting to state terrorism).
Can you explain why Israel ought to be interested in accepting anything other than surrender from Hamas? I can see why Hamas would prefer alternatives but am not seeing what's in it for Israel.
Israel should be willing to agree to a settlement for a number of reasons, but several of these don't apply if the point is to genocide and ethnically cleanse the population from Gaza (and the West Bank). Those reasons are,
1) The IDF would there by stop (accidentally) killing the few remaining living POWs.
2) This is likely the only hope for the majority of remaining POWs being returned alive.
3) The IDF would stop losing soldiers.
4) This is the only means by which Israel can actually achieve its stated objective, of Gaza no longer being governed by Hamas.
5) The IDF would then be able to stop killing and maiming Palestinian civilians.
6) The IDF would then be able to stop psychologically damaging its personal by instructing them to commit moral atrocities.
7) The IDF would then stop creating additional personal who are unable to travel abroad without fearing arrest in most foreign countries.
8) Israel could then stop taking additional hostages from the West Bank and Gaza (to be later traded in a prisoner exchange).
You are correct – words are not adequate. I also agree that using the word genocide creates a distraction. Agree, also, with your highlighting of Sudan.
In the end, the feudal scale of civilian deaths in the sealed territory by an advanced, modern society and one of the most powerful militaries in the world is horrific.
Its enough now – someone needs to step and get Israel out of Gaza and global humanitarian aid in.
The damage to Israel itself – the moral fabric of its young generation of reservists – its air force pilots – can they not see their own history in the skeletal faces of the Palestinian children? This is like a mirror into their own souls and it is a dark and brutal place.
Sudan involves a civil war (there was an earlier one in Ethiopia – a Tigray rebellion over federalism led by someone who had lost leadership in the national capital)(the continuing conflict in Somalia before that, then there is Chad and Yemen).
There are war crimes and crimes against humanity (not surprising given the leaders of the two factions were both involved in the same in Darfur decades ago).
Could you explain why this civil war is one that can be labelled "genocide".
Yet not the deliberate starvation of Gaza civilians and destruction of their homes to realise an ethnic cleansing?
PS. Are you unaware of a poll indicating 80% of Jews in Israel want the entire Palestinian population in Gaza expelled from the area (and 50% want the Israeli Arab citizens to go as well)?
D’oh – intended as reply to Champagne Socialist at 2.3.
I believe the Israelis saw their own history in the way their unarmed civilians were helpless as death squads went through their villages casually executing them.
Problem: if the IDF withdrew tomorrow and its government negotiated the return of the hostages and an end to the war, what would happen next? Based on what the UN, the Arab world and western countries are proposing, what happens next is that Hamas murders its way back to control of Gaza and proclaims victory. We, the long-suffering taxpayers of the western world, return to funding 'aid' that Hamas would use to repair its tunnel network and build missiles, the Egyptians return to profiting from smuggling weapons into Gaza via the tunnels, Qatar and Iran go back to handing over cash in pursuit of destroying the "Zionist Entity," and in a few years things would be ready to kick off again. I can see what would be in that for Hamas, but why would any Israeli government agree to it?
The general issue is a move away from moral (responsible) leadership.
The age of uber nationalism lends to use of force domestically and across national borders (and also civil wars). It could be called a fascist tendency.
Populism can lead to mob action, a form of assertion of majoritarian power resulting in a lack of regard for the civil liberties and human rights of others.
Peter Fraser's criticism of there being a veto power in the UNSC is still valid, we can note that most of the veto powers on the UNSC are unfit for the role they are supposed to perform.
All 5 are involved in an arms build-up and 3 are either either calling for others to join them, or acting in ways that encourage others to do so.
Foreign aid is in decline and right wing factions in many nations are moving to abandon their support for their nations remaining in the Paris Accord.