"Went to school?" Yes. And learned to spot liars. Particularly those who claim some kind of academic advantage, but can't read GDP data. https://thestandard.org.nz/the-problem-with-charter-schools/#comment-1447079
Cite? I'm calling you out because you lied about the GDP data. https://thestandard.org.nz/the-problem-with-charter-schools/#comment-1447079
"OAB: *links to the pathway*" No you didn't. What you claim is a pathway is like a shotgun wedding. That's not a pathway.
"Failure in State schools I have seen, is entirely because of the hidebound, financially focused performance, over-measured, micromanaged model, forced on them by the same people who advocate charter schools." Rubbish. Although it is ironic you want to ...
"SO the answer is for the state system to be able to more flexible..." Regrettably, that just isn't possible. The state system is, virtually by definition, not flexible enough. That is not it's fault, per se, it is simply the outcome of trying to educate a...
"They are not funded the same as state schools. They have minimum enrolement funding – state schools don’t have that." They are funded the same. But (PS's) don't have building provided by the MoE. PS's often provide uniforms, and in the cases I have cited ...
"So why do you think that character schools are worse at providing the supposed outcomes of (some) charter schools?" Character schools can do an excellent job, but they run differently. PS's were set up with a specific group in mind, and they have been ...
"No, it really hasn’t and to keep up it has to keep up with inflation and population growth." Yes, it really has, and I have provided the stats to prove that.
"Except currently they have no accountability, " That is another falsehood. PS's are vitally accountable, and in fact endure even greater scrutiny than most state schools.
"As far as I can see, you understand 1 or 2 charter schools which are doing well and are using them to say that ‘virtually all’ charter schools are ok. " Not so. I have referred to at least four partnership schools that I can recall. "GIven that any ‘good’...
You_Fool...can I engage with you seriously. I have no ideological bias, in fact I previously had serious doubts about partnership schools. But I have seen the results, and they are impressive. I also understand the opposition, and I will engage with it ...
It's not me you're laughing at. It's the children Jacinda Ardern gives awards to and then shuts their school. It's the children who the state system failed, and who PS's have given hope. They are the ones you are laughing at.
Yes. But I understand the sector, you don't.
The best way to take into account the needs of the children is to leave these schools alone.
Far from pointless. Have you read this guys blog?
http://www.partnershipschools.education.govt.nz/pskh/what-are-partnership-schools "Partnership Schools are funded by the state on a per-student basis. However, unlike regular state schools, whose relationship with the Crown is based on regulation, these ...
So you are asked for evidence and you send me the Dept of Stats website? In other words you cannot support your claim. OK. Let me help you: https://tradingeconomics.com/new-zealand/gdp-per-capita Now stop telling lies.
More lies. PS's are funded on the same basis as state schools. You know this. You lie to cover up an ideological bias that simply means children failed by the state system will return to that system. Well done.
Now I understand. You are a bitter little man with zero empathy for those less well off. And a time waster.
"So “successfully” that the Government had to hide their “success” by exempting them from the OIA." They are not hidden. Their results are publically available, both at their own websites and at ERO. The fact you need to spread such misinformation suggests...
Evidence. Not anecdotes.
No.
That is not a pathway, and you know it. It is a shotgun.
The government have announced these schools must change or close. There is no pathway. Discussions with PS's have been lip-service, at best.
The pathway for failed state schools is of course to have more state money thrown at them, aye.
The solution is simple. Retain the existing PS's as is. They are doing a better job with this select group of children than the state schools ever did.
PS's receive the same funding as state schools. You are the one who is lying.
Do I really have to spell this out? Non-state players have been delivering education for longer than state players. There is no 'cloud'.
So you now concede most PS's are not for profit?
Cite?
That doesn't cut it. And bragging about your supposed knowledge, when you haven't backed a single claim you have made, doesn't either.
Recent Comments