Written By:
mickysavage - Date published:
12:02 pm, January 11th, 2025 - 6 comments
Categories: climate change, Donald Trump, global warming, making shit up, Media, politicans, science, spin, uncategorized, you couldn't make this shit up -
Tags:
Over in the US of A the state of California is currently dealing with multiple large and out of control fires.
From the Guardian:
Even on their own, the fires are behemoths.
- Palisades, the first and largest fire, is spreading west of Los Angeles. Burning across 20,438 acres, the fire has only been 8% contained as of Friday morning, meaning firefighters have created control lines – usually wide trenches – around 8% of it. Officials say initial estimates indicate it has destroyed at least 5,300 structures between the Santa Monica Mountains and the Pacific Ocean, making it the most destructive wildfire in California right now.
- The Eaton fire, burning across Pasadena and Altadena areas in the north-east has blazed nearly 14,000 acres and has only been 3% contained. It has so far destroyed 4,000 structures, ranking it as the fourth most destructive wildfire in California’s history.
- The other fires currently burning across Los Angeles include Kenneth, Hurst and Lidia. Kenneth, a brush fire which emerged in the Woodlands Hills area on Thursday, has burned across 1,000 acres in Los Angeles and Ventura counties. As of Friday morning, it has been 35% contained. Meanwhile, the Hurst fire, which is burning across 771 acres across the northernmost suburb of Los Angeles, has been 37% contained as of Friday morning. Over in Antelope Valley, the Lidia fire has burned across 395 acres and is 75% contained as of Friday morning.
The cause is simple. Climate change has made the area hotter and drier and intense winds have spread initial ignitions with terrifying event.
And it was utterly predictable.
In this must read post from Democracy Now climate scientist and activist Peter Kalmus reports how he lived there until two years ago. He left because increasing heat and dryness made him leave the area in fear of his safety.
I couldn’t stay there … It’s not a new normal … It’s a staircase to a hotter, more hellish Earth.”
In the article he is quoted as saying:
I don’t know what to say anymore. I’ll get to that in a second, but I just want to make sure — the reason I wrote [this article in the New York Times] was because we have to acknowledge that this is caused by the fossil fuel industry, which has been lying for almost half a century, blocking action. They’re on the record saying that they will continue to spread disinformation and continue to attempt to block action. They’ve known the whole time that the planet would get hotter like this and that impacts like this fire would happen.
And then, something I really wanted — a point I really wanted to make in the piece, which they wouldn’t let me make, is that this is still just the beginning. It’s going to get way worse than this. Two years ago — well, 2020, when the Bobcat Fire happened, the whole time I was living in Altadena, it was getting hotter and more fiery and drier and smokier. And it just didn’t feel like I could stay there. Like, I could — you know, when you have a trendline, things getting worse every year — right? — like, where’s the point where something — where it breaks? You know, like, you keep going, keep pushing the system, getting hotter and hotter, getting drier and drier — right? — like, emitting more and more carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels, eventually things break.”
To emphasise his point he then said this:
[I]f we don’t change course very quickly — and maybe it’s even too late to avoid some of these much more catastrophic impacts, but I am fully expecting heat waves to start appearing where 100,000 people die, and then maybe a million people die, and then maybe more after that, as things get hotter and hotter, because there’s no — there’s no upper limit, right? Like, we keep burning these fossil fuels. The fossil fuel industry keeps lying. The planet just keeps getting hotter. These impacts just keep getting worse.It’s not a new normal. A lot of climate messaging centers around this idea that it’s a new normal. It’s a staircase to a hotter, more hellish Earth.
My jaw dropped when I read the NY Times tried to dumb down his article by not emphasising where this is leading us to. This should be front page news. Unless we address climate change now things are going to get way worse.
The fires have been met by the usual response from the right.
Elon Musk has attacked the gender and sexual identity of a fire fighter and has emphasised that getting rid of red tape and quicker processing times for consents is a priority.
He has said this:
The real red pill will come when people try to get permits to rebuild their homes and face multiyear waits. This might finally spell doom for the Californian Coastal Commission, which should not even exist as an organization.”
He and his buddy Donald Trump have tried to blame Californian Governor Gavin Newsom for the fires.
Trump has made a number of patently false assertions:
The reality is that this is the hottest year on record and Los Angeles area has received less rainfall since the start of the rainy season in October than almost any other year since record-keeping began in 1877.
It is amazing that the debate should continue. That the right who serve the interests of billionaires whose temporary wealth relies on the burning of fossil fuels should continue to downplay the effects of climate change is predictable but completely bonkers.
Hang on. As Peter Kalmus states this is going to get rough.
And don’t think we are immune. As temperatures increase and droughts become more regular the incidence of fires over here will increase. And we are one wind blown fire away from suffering similar devastation.
excellent post. I've seen some of the misinformation the post mentions and more.
This link explains more about the LA water issue.
The high winds stopping aerial firefighting. There was so much water being drawn off by the fire hydrants from storage tanks in a short period of time, it couldn't be sustained because the hydrants couldn't cope. It was an unprecedented event – and I guess unexpected. There was still plenty of water in the reservoirs.
In NZ we need to prepared for unpredictable and unexpected events in the future – not starving necessary public services of funds via taxes etc.
Minor point: it was 2024 that was the hottest year on record, not this (2025) year.
Our most intensely populated area in a subtropical forest is Titirangi to Bethells in Auckland. Covers about 120,000 hectares total.
It has about 30,000 residents, 10,000 fairly expensive houses, 10% of Auckland's water supply with 4 dams, and 6,000 hectares of rare bird sanctuary.
Also 4 small fire stations and no infrared monitoring.
It'll all happen at some point.
I'd be more worried about the Central Otago, the Canterbury Plains, Tasman. Often with fast-moving low vegetation fires, windbreak and plantation fires.
The cause of fires in LA are usually precipitated by dryness, they are driven by dry air driven over a orographic lift. They come out of the mountain and hill country with hell of a lot of velocity, dry out vegetation. and make any blaze extend rapidly. The Santa Ana winds have an analogies here.
It is pretty much the same here.
The orographic winds coming over the New Zealand Alps get pretty damn dry because they drop most of their rain on the other side, they pass over a parched summer landscape, and they often have a lot of speed and inertia.
We can get similar effects from orographic air masses falling off the volcanic plateau.
If you have a look at where we have had large and extensive wildfires, it isn't in places with subtropical vegetation. It is in places that have fast dry winds.
eg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raetihi_Forest_fire
https://www.nzgeo.com/stories/wildfire-2/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Port_Hills_fires
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Port_Hills_fire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeon_Valley_Fire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_%C5%8Chau#Lake_%C5%8Chau_fire_2020
etc.
Sure it possible that we could get a severe enough drought at some point to cause the Waitakeres to burn. However it would take a really major shift in weather patterns, because most of that area is in the small orographic drop zone from wet air coming off the Tasman Sea, which is Auckland's common prevailing climatic wind pattern (mostly westerly) – see wind rose section here. Which is the reason that those dams are there. The lift of the old volcanoes in the Waitakeres cause a water drop. Same with the Hunua dams as SW winds hit the Hunua area after passing through the flat Waikato plains.
And all this is happening in the Northern Hemisphere winter, how much worse will it be in summer?
There are other factors
1.After two decades of droughts, 2022 and 2023 were higher rainfall years and there was a lot of vegetation growth. This was all dry because of the 2024 drought.
They declared a high fire risk a week before the fires (which then coincided with stronger Santa Ana winds than normal (these occur Sep-March) – off the hills towards the coast with embers starting house/section fires.
Newsom has been accused of poor forestry/vegetation management, despite the known increasing risk from GW.
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/california-los-angeles-wildfires-karen-bass-climate-change-b2676535.html
2.The LA county does not have a full staffing for the 12 month a year city normal. They do not have trained volunteer reservists, just the state National Guard (for looting and other security).
This in a nation without a fire fighting reserve (inter-state seasonal transfers) for emergency situations (apart from US Air Force planes being used). They have also done this
https://www.nationalguard.mil/News/Article-View/Article/3223104/fireguard-program-enhances-national-guard-wildfire-fighting/
They appear about as organised as their health system in getting results.
3.If they build back, they need covenants making sections/housing ember fire resistant. Already insurance companies had started denying insurance in Altadena because of the fire risk, that would go viral after this outbreak of fires.
Random insights
Staffing
Ember fires overwhelming local water supply, high fire risk area housing covenants and forest logging.
CNN coverage
https://edition.cnn.com/weather/live-news/los-angeles-wildfires-palisades-eaton-california-01-09-25-hnk/index.html
https://edition.cnn.com/weather/live-news/los-angeles-wildfires-palisades-eaton-california-01-09-25-hnk/index.html
Background
Park once more
https://archive.li/MtMOD#selection-4749.176-4788.1
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/in-the-palisades-an-evacuation-disaster-was-years-in-the-making/UOVVTYGQS5ARFEZVOV65XX2HVE/