Daily review 24/10/2024

Written By: - Date published: 5:30 pm, October 24th, 2024 - 13 comments
Categories: Daily review - Tags:

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

13 comments on “Daily review 24/10/2024 ”

    • SPC 1.1

      The methods of neutralising the WT, as with the HRC, is either by the appointments process, or by de-funding.

      This is the way of National, pandering to the more gauche populism of their right wing partner ACT.

      • tWig 1.1.1

        ACT drives this, not the Nats. Plausible deniability for them if, or rather when, it turns to kaka.

  1. Incognito 2

    A fairly accurate appraisal of the current state of the opposition in NZ.

    https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/10/22/democracy-is-weaker-when-oppositions-go-quiet

    Paraphrasing the piece:

    Opposition? What Opposition?

    • Anne 2.1

      From the link:

      There is a belief that releasing policy too far in advance of an election will hurt parties at the polls and speaking up too soon after an election defeat will just be ignored.

      There's truth to that in normal circumstances but these are not normal times. Ayesha Verrall has been on the ball and a few others, including Hipkins, are waking up after their long slumber. In the meantime this govt. has taken to every positive move by the previous govt. with a large axe and they have virtually let them off with a sloshy bus ticket. Not good enough.

      • Incognito 2.1.1

        Launching new policy proposals is part of only one of the three main pillars of political communication, according to the piece, the other two are to “defend/promote your record”, and to “attack your opponents”. What are the other 50-odd MPs with their party apparatuses behind them doing?? They’re actually paid to do a job, and an important one, for that matter!

      • bwaghorn 2.1.2

        National won by being negative and barking at every car for 6 years

        • Anne 2.1.2.1

          The problem there is: the MSM let National and ACT get away with it, but not Labour and the Greens. They tip toe around Te Pati Maori because they don't want to be labelled racist.

  2. weston 3

    Israel continues to kill and kill some more in Gaza , Afaik only the Electronic Intifada covers its killing spree so comprehensively .Jon Elmer's " resistance report " starts about 141 and in this episode gives lots of detail of the killing of Yaya Sinwar and his resistance movement .



  3. Anne 4

    In my view, the behaviour of Casey Costello and her leader, Winston Peters is worthy of a complaint to the Speaker and at some subsequent point legal action by Ayesha Verrall with the support of leader, Hipkins:

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/531809/ministry-of-health-apologises-to-minister-over-failure-to-disclose-conflict-of-interest

    "The official I mentioned in my general debate is Ayesha Verrall's sister-in-law … who attended multiple meetings with the minister, worked on tobacco reform legislation advice, and who did not declare to the minister that she was a close relative nor did she declare that there was a massive conflict of interest.
    "The deceit and underhandedness shown by Verrall throughout her constant political attacks and smear campaign against one of my ministers [is] now writ large."

    Rather than become involved in a slanging match with Peters [which is what he wants] she should by-pass him and lay a formal complaint with the speaker followed by court action.

    • Vivie 4.1

      Yes Anne. As reported in your linked article:

      "In a statement to RNZ, acting director-general Maree Roberts said the ministry official had adhered to its conflict of interest rules, but the ministry had failed to then "specifically" pass on the conflict to Costello.

      "This was the responsibility of the Ministry of Health. The ministry has apologised to the associate minister of health for this oversight.

      "The ministry does have a conflict of interest protocol which is well-communicated to all staff and was adhered to by the individual in this case."

      https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/531809/ministry-of-health-apologises-to-minister-over-failure-to-disclose-conflict-of-interest

      Neither Ayesha Verrall nor the staffer are in any way at fault. Winston Peters is using deflection, in an attempt to distract from the unethical conduct of Casey Costello and Andrew Bayly.

      • Anne 4.1.1

        Of course he is. There is no way after 46 years in politics [minus one or two terms in the wilderness] he didn't know the protocol around conflict of interest rules. If Labour has finally got their mojo back, they will shout out his hypocrisy and his "deceit and underhandness" [to quote himself] from the roof tops.

  4. SPC 5

    From Whangarei to Dunedin and back.

    Promises of rebuild and a year on.

    One wonders what the new “in budget” criteria means for them and those at Nelson, Hawke’s Bay, Palmerston North and Tauranga.

    https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/10/24/whangarei-hospital-redevelopment-at-risk-due-to-funding-shortfall/