I actually agree with you, that housing is a problematic area. Because, owning investment houses for rentals has been fairly pervasive with politicians I am not sure what is in place now. But, I think politicians need to be discussing potential conflicts ...
Your idiosyncratic hypothetical examples rarely have any bearing on reality and are often bordering on being absurd. The point is not to show real life examples, but to point to the principle that the overall effect needs to be considered, balancing up ...
Whataboutism doesn't make this right unfortunately. As I have said a number of times, the issue isn't about the fact the shares were owned by Wood, or the number of them. It is the fact that the conflict of interest wasn't declared, and now it turns out he...
I think Wood could be in trouble now. Turns out he declined the application by North Shore airport application while holding shares in Auckland airport. The problem I see here is not so much the value of the shares, but the possibility that Wood may have ...
Not even close. Himars etc would only scratch the surface of that structure. It requires properly placed explosives to achieve that sort of damage. Watch that second video by Michael Clarke I linked to.
Do you always tilt the field in your favour for you to score points easily & lazily? I didn't think I was. And, it is totally contingent on a variety of factors whether 5 houses would be a conflict or not. For example, on one hand a decision maker may own...
No, they had a lot more to gain than lose from a military perspective. Firstly it effectively reduced their front line so far as defence is concerned. Secondly, it frees up a lot of troops to defend in other areas. The other thing is that the damage was ...
Again, as I pointed out above, the issue is managing conflicts of interest. Wood would be in the clear if he had declared his potential conflict correctly. Given the fact it is only a small shareholding, then likely declaring that should be enough, even as...
Your self-appointed role as a concern troll is really rather tiring. It is election year. lol. Do you fundamentally disagree with my comment?
Here Michael Clarke gives a more indepth analysis. Quite interesting.
It is all about managing perceived conflicts of interest. I am on several boards for trusts, and we have to declare perceived conflicts of interest so it is transparent to all. And, if the conflict is significant enough, we may have to recluse ourselves ...
Certainly that. But, also some military defensive advantage as well. It makes it nigh on impossible for the Ukrainians to advance across the Dnipro now in that location. So, it simplifies things for the Russians, and allows them to redeploy their troops. ...
And, the other thing is that the Russians had raised the water level to maximum height just prior to the explosion, thus maximising the flooding. Note: should be "dam" not "damn" in my earlier post. Posting early in the morning lol.
I see the Russians have blown the Kakhovka damn causing a humanitarian disaster, and in doing so committed a major war crime. Not much doubt that it was the Russians. As the video above points out, it was understood last year that the Russians had mined ...
It is all about perceived conflict of interest. A minister of Transport making decisions that could potentially benefit his investment is a problem. In this case, it is unlikely because the holding is small. But, it is simply a bad look.
Events of the last few weeks are not really ideal for Labour when their opponent is attempting to paint them (in a future governmental mix) as a "Coalition of Chaos".
I tend to agree. I don't think he should be sacked over this. But it isn't a good look, especially with an election coming, and other MPs in trouble.
He could end up before the privileges committee yet. Not a good look if that happens. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/transport-minister-michael-wood-promises-to-sell-his-auckland-airport-shares/5NBG6QBNDJG6VII3I7NPGKZSMM/ From the article: Otago ...
I agree with you to the extent that I think it is much better for everyone, including the people themselves, to have people employed doing something productive rather than sitting around doing nothing. The sort of wastage my brother talked of was ...
Good to hear. And, I hope it is something that will be continued if there is a change of government.
Rail can be electrified even if it means burning coal at Huntly its 8 times more efficient than burning fuel in a car or truck. I would be interested to see the cost efficiency of that moddled on a nationwide basis. Plus, we are already struggling with ...
Are you suggesting just the rails are publicly owned or the trains as well? Because there was huge wastage and inefficiency when rail (including trains etc) was publicly owned. This was well documented years back. And my brother, who did an apprenticeship ...
It is quite usual in business to run a model at a loss in the first instance in order to meet the market and generate sufficient volume to generate profits through economies of scale. But, things do end up having to become profitable, otherwise, they are a...
If something is good for the climate, and it makes money, then there is a lot more incentive for people to invest in that area. So, it makes sense for things to be profitable. It takes a lot of pressure off the government as well, because funding will ...
That is why I have suggested local shipping as an option. It would help make rail more economically viable, in that, a combination of both would likely reduce the number of rail-lines required, and thus reduce the amount of mainteance required for rails. ...
Interesting to see two opposing viewpoints put forward on this issue. I haven't had time to comment yet, so now I will say something: It appears Advantage has argued more from an economic perspective whereas Weka has argued from a climate perspective. I ...
Weka, it shouldn't have been necessary to go to the High Court in the first place IMO. But, at least it was possible to do that. I am not sure whether it will be easier or harder to challenge that type on decision under the proposed model.
Weka, I understand the points made about consistency with the NZ bill of rights etc. That is all fine in theory. But, I think the problem arises when we consider competing rights. A given regulator may decide that trans groups are a minority and need to be...
I will come back to you later. We have our two year old twin grandchildren here at the moment. So, not a lot of time for blogging. Lol.
It all depends on how words such as "harmful" are operationalised in practice. From the document: Unintentional exposure to the most harmful content on online platforms should be far less common Overseas experience in places like GB has been that "...
Just from overseas experience. For instance in Great Britain. We certainly don't want to be heading in that direction, or we will be breeding a generation of fragile snow flakes. From the article. Reformers want section 5 of the act amended so that the ...
Recent Comments