Written By:
- Date published:
11:47 am, March 3rd, 2025 - 10 comments
Categories: uncategorized -
Tags:
This is an excerpt from a longer article: What Can We Do Again?
There are three things to know about this current government – and from that, extrapolate our options.
Public interest journalism is under threat – state or publicly funded broadcasters like RNZ, NPR, PBS, Australia’s ABC are at risk / under direct attack.
Corporate media, reliant on advertising revenues and measured on profitability, is increasing its reach.
It was always like this – Rupert Murdoch built an empire on controlling politics and power through media.
British tabloids such as Daily Fail often host a cesspit of right wing commentary.
But the rot has expanded rapidly through social media channels — including on Substack — and our ignorance that corporate and big money may be influencing mainstream media has been exploited.
Yesterday, someone told me that the school lunches saga wasn’t David Seymour’s problem because she had heard that on Mike Hosking’s radio show.
It’s effective.
Algorithms for search engines are also controlled by private US technology companies.
Meta is a masks off Trump stooge company and Zuckerberg had told staff he wants his platforms to become a “productive partner with the White House”.
Let that sink in.
Maybe that’s why it doesn’t consider attacks on our female politicians a breach of their rules either:
This post did not breach Meta standards.
It’s a free for all in the new world and female, liberal politicians will unfairly bear the brunt of it.
As Tory Whanau did above.
And Julie Ann Genter.
Stuff posts an article quoting Jordan William’s complaints as its digital front page headline
Jeff Bezos is masks off too in the media world:
WaPo lost 75,000 subscribers after this note, on top of 200,000 when he blocked Kamala’s endorsement, but honestly, Bezos really couldn’t give a shit.
As Slate reports,
The Washington Post is a minor, minor component of Bezos’ business portfolio. Much more central to the billionaire’s past, present, and future fortune are the world-devouring Amazon.com and his spaceflight startup, Blue Origin….
The cuts that Musk and the Trump Cabinet are making represent a potential windfall for Bezos and his businesses—assuming, of course, that he’s able to stay on Trump’s good side.
And NZME is pivoting to an (even more) sensationalist news approach after letting go of staff4 and pivoting on its strategy to prioritise “clicks” as outlined by Gavin Ellis in this great piece.
Worse, a NZ based Canadian billionaire has now taken a major stake in NZME. James Grenon is also responsible for alternative websites that appears to frequently push anti-Maori rights storylines etc. Grenon also pushed money into NZ’s 2023 election.
Here in NZ – the rot continues.
Winston Peters, who in 2019 passionately defended the essential role of the fifth estate, has adopted Trump’s tactic in the last few years – launching extraordinary attacks on our media, labelling journalists “biased”, accusing Labour of “bribery”, and even threatening Jack Tame and then labelling him a “left wing shill” after Tame pressed Peters for answers on Q&A.
ACT regularly attack media as well, and through their surrogate accounts, are inviting more Kiwis to hear from Seymour ‘directly’ now i.e. without any analysis and context.
This government appeared not to care about the demise of Newshub after not acting on warnings. Tova O Brien said National thought Newshub was “too fearless” and therefore, by association, was happy to see them die.
This is all a very long way of saying – the new right wing politicians know the game is almost, solely, a PR and communications game.
They have mass resources and have spread their tentacles over much of what we hear and absorb and perceive.
Money buys influence and editorial choice in media.
They are out to influence you subliminally as well as overtly.5
The right’s wealthiest are all emboldened.
Trump is the right wing junk tank and Russian influence experiment that finally succeeded after many attempts e.g. bombing out on another of their products, Liz Truss.
And their rules of engagement have been updated around the world – including in Aotearoa.
2. This New Zealand government is a PR government and their tactics and game emulate right wing conservatives around the world
That means junk tank tactics: astroturfing (paid, vested interest accounts masked as normal citizens), supported by junk tank alliances, mass media co-operation, spreading misinformation, having affiliates or themselves develop grievances in the population and then exploiting that, emotion filled analysis, lies i.e. disinformation.
Controlling the narrative is essential.
Winning over loyal, feels over facts, voters is key.
Grievances are their power.
And to be clear, discontent can be based on facts –
For example:
But discontent is also based on propaganda – and very importantly, disassociating people from the root causes:
On the last point, many Māori brothers added their voice to that conversation – while I wondered why no-one realised Chris Bishop had directed Kainga Ora to cut 60% of social houses this year, and he will cap state houses to only 420 additional new builds in 2026.
With 23,000 people on the wait list, some users are reporting wait lists of over 10 years… but people can’t connect the dots.
And racism is likely to increase as people don’t understand, and will blame it all on ‘refugees’ and ‘immigrants’ (more votes for NZ First!)
And the government’s actions – and its results will escape scrutiny – while people get angrier and society gets more divided.
This all plays into their hands you see.
3. The government is ideological above all which means they will push through despite objections
I remember reading a while ago that this government intended not to back down in the face of public opinion.
They have been fairly consistent on this – but have folded on issues such as cancer drugs funding and Luxon’s Premier House entitlement.
They have not budged where they can drive a wedge in society e.g. on the Treaty Principles Bill, mining, speed limits etc.
This all makes a lot of sense – they are here for their ideology, and in my view, to back vested interests.
Their junk tank networks have already learned people will fold if you stand strong.
Resistance is futile as long as you carve out about 30-40% of people to your cause.
Whenever I watch Select Committee meetings, I see respectful, serious, thoughtful, compassionate people testifying on impacts of proposed bills go up against questions like ‘Well why don’t beneficiaries buy a menstrual cup to save money?’
Evidence, painstaking testimony, experience, facts are all flaccid against the government’s intent.
It’s just true – and their long term plan is to ensure it remains the case.
What we can do depends on the context – always.
In America, there is not that much liberals can do as their government has been taken over by fascism – yes, in a “free” election.
The ‘right’ in America are akin to a cult, long cultivated with lies, anger, and misinformation spread by outlets such as Fox News, Daily Mail, Steve Bannon’s outlets, and Russian associated propaganda.
The lack of empathy and kinship towards fellow Americans seems to have been eliminated, along with their ability to critically analyse information.
These are their new leaders:
After Trump’s meeting with Zelensky, as much of the world recoiled, Americans pushed forward to essentially say:
“Well too bad, but America has to look after its own” &
“We are tired of paying for Ukraine, we’re going to look after ourselves.”
i.e The split is one of selfishness – do we recoil in fear or do we choose to open our hearts?
So do this for where we are –
If you’re part of social media, contribute your voice – not just in your circles, outside of them.
If you’re still on Facebook, politely correct misinformation and lies.
If your family is not aware, share news stories with them.
If your friends adore Trump, appeal to their self-interest.
If you moderate a subreddit or Facebook group, update your operating system to prioritise misinformation, and be aware of bad operators.
Do what makes sense in your world – but the point here is you want to reach people outside of those that agree with you.
You want to use the resources you have available – as small as they might be – to stop the stem of misinformation spread with Goliath like resources.
Stop attacking politicians or leaders who are trying to help your values by nitpicking the past, or their competencies.
Help them help you.
Yes. we all want another hero to rise among the ranks and save the world, but in case you’ve forgotten, those people are invariably taken down by the might of the right.
No-one is safe until the blanket of lies and misappropriation of root cause is rectified.
They need your help as much as you want them to save our ass.
Even if Labour / Greens / TPM etc win here in 2026, the people that dangle the strings won’t care – it’s just a long term play and like the USA, maybe it won’t happen overnight, but it can happen.
I also see constant barbs towards Chris Hipkins, and although I have been reflecting on leadership tangentially, the right’s insistence that Hipkins is a failed leader who should step down tells me that he has strengths.
54% of voters are happy to see him stay as Labour leader. He’s intelligent and shows emotional maturity.
Furthermore, Labour’s unity behind him is significant – and so for now, I prefer to trust their insights, and focus on my cause, rather than the left’s favourite past time of bashing anyone who isn’t perfect or who has made mistakes.
We’re all brilliant with hindsight.
I’m not saying Labour, Greens and TPM should not be scrutinized.
I’m saying we still have time for evaluation and should stay united in the face of what we face.
The US technology companies like Meta could at some point be expected to harness your data for political purposes as we speak. Cambridge Analytica was ostensibly a “mistake”.
Facebook is now an official Trump partner and the next one won’t be.
Substack is using our writing to train AI models and by hosting neo-Nazi content, who knows where it will go once it’s truly successful? It’s also using our writing and chats to train its AI programs.
Zuckerberg and Bezos used to posture about liberal values too – until the alternative was more self-serving.
All US technology – Reddit, Substack, Meta,Twitter, cloud hosting, email, search engine algorithms, is now suspect – and you should be ready to unplug when you need to – or before then.
Selfishness is one common denominator that crosses class, gender, culture, nationality, race, identity.
It’s not out there in the faces of Trump, Vance, Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos.
It’s in you, me, everyone that you come across – including the people who write nice words.
What’s that feeling of competitiveness, winning, money, and acquisition across all stratas?
On Substack, 1000 paid subscribers on a rate of $100 a year nets a writer maybe ~$85,000 or about US$40,000.
For ones with higher volumes and/or higher rates, that can easily blow past $200,000 and in significant cases $1,000,000.
I’ve seen famous writers with thousands and thousands of paid subscribers write entire posts about saving the world that translate to: “Please support me”.
I’d rather, at that rate, suggest users support charities, donate to Forest and Bird, help refugees, donate to political parties that can advance your cause, or crowd source infrastructure that sustains future viability, housing, & transparency.
Once we get to a certain threshold, when is enough enough, people?
If Jeff Bezos is reportedly “scared” of Donald Trump, when is money enough?
If you can’t fight the micro i.e. yourself, don’t expect the world to grow outside of your image.
Disclosure: I’m on well under minimum wage here on Substack – which is my choice to be here.
44% of Americans approve of Trump’s actions over the last month or two.
~40% of Kiwis voted for this right wing Coalition govermment and remain satisfied enough with them.
Adjust to that – go out and see and hear those thoughts.
Look for opportunities to intersect.
Don’t expect the government to give in, but fight like hell on issues that matter to you – remembering that their game is publicity and so long as they can blanket the halls with doubt and misdirection, they believe they can win.
A user asked how we can stop the school lunches – we can only do that if you show enough other people in NZ that there is a real problem.
And you can only do so by sharing the truth and being influential enough.
We need the scale back to 60 – 40 in favour of doing what’s best for society.
That includes scaling back the wealth advantages and manipulation of tax havens and corporate tax cuts that rely on the mythology of trickle down economics.
Utilise opportunities to share similiarities between what is happening in America with the direction here.
The right need a complacent and doubtful audience to win so they will always play it down.
Remember: they also cultivated doubt before Trump won that he was in any way associated with Project 2025, and as a result media could only publish his denials.
However, media has not been able to update its code in the face of blatant sabotage.
And to be fair to media, they need to comply with their codes of practice – even as we see RNZ, Newsroom and to an extent at times, TVNZ, do some smashing good pieces.
PS Trump is rolling out Project 2025 directives as we speak. Turns out plausible deniability can be rolled once you win the reigns. Who knew?
Authoritarians governments despise all form of organisation that threaten its interests and narratives.
There is power in unity and people.
This government is systematically attacking workers’s rights and weakening and icing out unions for a very clear reason.
Yet unions have been our strongest voices across health, public sector, police etc.
Their people appear principled and use fact-based data.
Join one now.
If only we had listened to the unions!
You and your family deserve that.
Points 3 and 8 are related.
Acknowledge the addictive nature of SM and the time and energy (rarely positive) that it takes, and curtail yr time on it.
At our essence, we are attention. If that is taken up with negative political cul de sacs then what chance agitating, uplifting and organising for a brighter future?
A very interesting (and scary) read. Thank you MT.
To me, this mess isn't a result of big money or social media, it's ultimately because there are simply too many thick/ignorant/apathetic people on this planet, and said idiots have the right to vote- or not vote.
Uneducated, gullible, self-centred, brainwashed, 'not interested', incapable of even a basic critical thinking about anything, yet alone politics. I can remember how people would vote for party X 'because their parents do.'
I feel it's an impossible task to get through to these people, especially when all they can do is spout the talking points from FB and have absolutely no idea why they're even repeating them. trying to have a reasonable discussion with RW supporters in order to hear other opinions just isn't possible.
A more achievable goal would be to encourage the non-voters to actually vote. There's a lot of them, and a high voter turnout could make quite a difference to the shape of parliament. The US would be a much different country politically if the majority voted (being very aware of the deliberate disenfrachising of certain groups, and gerrymandering).
Now apparently, there is a Bill for US voter registration that will mean married women who have a name change will have to present more documentation to prove their identity.
That's the problem with democracy, people who don't agree with you get to vote. /sarc/
I don't see how mandating voting would improve things in any way. If people aren't motivated to vote now, then what level of 'quality' would their vote have? Much more subject to the latest PR campaign, than to intelligent evaluation of alternatives.
I never suggested mandatory voting, only encouraging more people to vote. I don't actually care who they vote for, only that they take the time to make an informed vote.
Hello Kay
There are billionaires that push out disinformation and try to separate society through lies and grievances too. So the risk is that proportion of people who vote against their own interests increases.
In Joined-Up Thinking, by Hannah Critchlow, she reported that paracentemol intake greatly inhibits our ability to feel/empathise with other's pain.
When something like 40% of US adults take paracetemol daily for pain, combined with the numbing effects of negative social media, it is actually harder, physically and psychologically for many people to 4. Stop being selfish.
A brilliant post Mountain Tui. Nick Mowbray made me reflect on the rich I know.
Some well off (11 rentals owned without mortgages), feel entitled to do the following,
Take every "freebie" they can from hotels/motels they use.
They look to share costs of outings, even when they know they are stretching the other party.
They say things like "Nothing is free!!", then offer you sugar sticks from their motel foray.
Generalisations are the order of the day, and othering regular.
As for discussions, it quickly becomes mantras against Unions Socialism and Protestors. However, they agree the new school lunch programme is awful. (A small gain)
When social housing was coming too close to home, the self interest was palpable. The reasons for not having it there seldom was the loss of value of their property as a reason. "Lowering the tone of the neighbourhood, changing the neighbourhood profile"….etc. was offered.
Nick Mowbray's comment about the school lunches, denies there is a lack of food in some households, and ignores the lost public transport work and raised costs caused by this Government.
His wealth gained through toys which end up in landfill which we all pay for, did not cause him a moment's pause, it is just a slightly bigger "freebie" I guess.
He sees himself as not "needing handouts", while encouraging lower taxes for business!! Perception is everything.
It is not wealth that is the problem. It is the insulating effect on reality. A reliable car, a warm home, food readily available and health care, both Public and Private, warps the perception of the other experience. It leads to "Just get a sandwich".
PM Luxon's reaction to the Lunch debacle echoes the insulation of money.
He has faith David Seymour will fix it. (David missed meeting with the Minister of Education to explain the problems, as the Act meeting "ran over time", and the meeting has been rescheduled.) That is going to be interesting, as the PM appears to have pre-empted that!!
The PM admitted he did not really like providing food, as he felt parents should make a marmite sandwich and an apple for a lunch.
The cost of an apple a day? 86 cents to $1.30 x by 2 to 4 children x5. then add the bread and filling. Some of these families have lost employment, free or half price bus fares, caused by this Government's choices as they move Government costs back to the public.
This is of far more importance than PM Luxon and MP Seymour seem to understand.
If you can't govern to assist young hungry children, you are not a fit person for office.
Further Government contracts should employ us, and profits should stay in our communities, not go overseas to a corporate.
David Seymour demonstrates failure on several citizen levels, and in backing David before a real enquiry and evaluation, we learn we have an impatient mean spirited PM who has over ridden any complaints by the Minister of Education, who happens to be a woman.
In regards Seymour 'fixing' the many problems with the (non) delivery,
poor quality,
repeating options,
overheated,
increased waste
of budget meals.
I've cooked my whole adult life.
Officers mess, high quality, 30 seat, 5 course, a la carte through to 1000 person junior ranks mees, field cooking for nany remote sites for several thousand.
Seymour can't 'fix' any of it. These issues are the usual consequence of frozen, reheated food, prepared and cooked by minimum wage workers, then distributed around the motu.
Not for love, professional pride nor care for the children, but for profit.