Daily review 03/03/2025

Written By: - Date published: 5:30 pm, March 3rd, 2025 - 5 comments
Categories: Daily review - Tags:

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

5 comments on “Daily review 03/03/2025 ”

  1. Patricia Bremner 1

    So David Seymour thinks we should be grateful for the terrible debacle of his school lunches.

    They should be stopped for one reason alone. The list of additives is very bad for growing children.

    He is being dictatorial, forgetting he was placed there by CoC, so please send complaints to all of the Leaders, as well as your local MP.

    This can not continue, and David Seymour should evaluate properly instead of accepting reckons. It is a failure.

  2. joe90 2

    The World's most moral army is using starvation as a weapon of war.

    Pricks.

    Several Arab states and the UN have condemned Israel for blocking the entry of all humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip.

    Egypt and Qatar said the Israeli move on Sunday violated a ceasefire deal, while UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher described it as "alarming".

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his country acted because Hamas was stealing the supplies and using them "to finance its terror machine".

    He also accused the Palestinian group of rejecting a US proposal to extend the ceasefire in Gaza, after it expired on Saturday. Israel said it had approved the proposal.

    A Hamas spokesman said Israel's blockade was "cheap blackmail" and a "coup" against the ceasefire agreement.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c70e6rye9nxo

  3. SPC 3

    The C of C coming for stewardship land (managed by DOC).

    From 43.40.

    Shane Jones, a Minister of Conservation who knows those in iwi who want mining.

    https://www.tvnz.co.nz/shows/q-and-a/episodes/s2025-e2

  4. SPC 4

    Part one.

    Tim Groser – he does not like AUKUS Pillar 2 but thinks we need to be in it (realpolitic to maintain a connection to Australia).

    Part two.

    Sean Gourley – founder CEO of PrimerAI – he also thinks we should be in AUKUS Pillar 2 (sees AI as giving a military advantage).

    But his reasoning is flawed, he presumes we would not be able to access tech for our military, if we were not contributing to its development.

    The issue for our security is more one of planning for the impact of AI on our economic and governance future (and on education, calculators onto IT onto AI impact) and applied use of it in our military.

    So is there an alternative to international partnerships – such as a Crown Institution providing expertise to the public service, private sector and military (as to use/application developments)?

    Associate membership – as to reports on developments, access to the tech for our utilisation?

    This would allow us to maintain interoperability with Oz, as we do while not in ANZUS.

    Binding the concept of R & D co-operation amongst a wider group of nations to affiliation with AUKUS has a lot of loaded connotations, such as a southern Cold War.

    The value of a nuclear free South Pacific concept still has utility.

    https://www.tvnz.co.nz/shows/q-and-a/episodes/s2025-e1