Daily review 09/05/2022

Written By: - Date published: 5:30 pm, May 9th, 2022 - 15 comments
Categories: Daily review - Tags:

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

15 comments on “Daily review 09/05/2022 ”

  1. Robert Guyton 1

    There MUST be a post written on James Shaw's climate change/emissions reduction announcements.

    PLEASE.

    And TS supporters, PLEASE watch his announcements here: https://www.facebook.com/JamesShawMP/videos/398832931905360

    • pat 2.1

      As always there is justification.

      • Robert Guyton 2.1.1

        Yes. Politics, eh!

        I believe Shaw's doing the best that can possibly be done.

        Perhaps all actions will fall short.

        Never the less, we have to do the best that can possibly be done 🙂

        • pat 2.1.1.1

          And the pointing out of the inadequacies will continue….as they should.

          • Patricia Bremner 2.1.1.1.1

            It is not pointing out inadequacies that grates…. it is the failure to suggest positive improvements. Knockers are two a penny, people with ideas…few.

        • Anne 2.1.1.2

          Problem with James Shaw is: he's a thoroughly decent fellow. He beavers away quietly without fanfare and he doesn't seek attention for the sake of it like some pollies we know. If he was incompetent or lazy we would have heard all about it by now, but we have heard nothing. That tells me he is doing a good job.

        • Temp ORary 2.1.1.3

          I am reminded of this Kurzgesagt video from a month ago (from 12:30 mark, but the whole is worth a watch if you have the time):

          The results of fighting a steep uphill battle are now clearly visible.

          The pressure needs to keep increasing, to make sure that the promises made today are actually kept!

          Climate Doomerism is the equivalent of giving up…

  2. Tony Veitch (not etc.) 3

    I hope some brave soul will do an autopsy (sorry, forensic fiscal analysis) on the Act budget.

    I haven't got the stomach to go onto the Act website to read it.

    Cheers.