Daily review 27/03/2025

Written By: - Date published: 5:30 pm, March 27th, 2025 - 9 comments
Categories: Daily review - Tags:

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

9 comments on “Daily review 27/03/2025 ”

  1. SPC 1

    Retractable seats 1 Helen Clark 0.

    The vote went 17 to 2, with one abstention.

    A landslide win for the fortress.

  2. SPC 3

    Chris Bishop has announced a new funding line for housing developments that will ultimately be repaid by homeowners through an annual levy.

    The debt would then be re-financed to private markets, such as a bank, once the development is complete. It would ultimately be re-paid by the new homeowners via a levy.

    Mortgage to one bank and an annual levy to another. Profiting from loan to home purchase and also taking on the debt used to finance the development – so the government is not seen to charge the levy itself.

    https://archive.li/uvgBg#selection-4049.172-4049.195

  3. weka 4

    how is this real? Musk is giving $1M prizes to people in Wisonsin that sign his petition against 'activist' judges. Also paying $100 to people that sign? Tesla are suing the state over the policy of not allowing car manufacturers to sell direct to the public (which is how Tesla sells its vehicles). And there's an election on April 1st for a judge for the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

    I'm not seeing a lot of MSM coverage of this, but I guess it was only on twitter today.

    Musk,

    Exciting to announce our first million dollar award for supporting our petition against activist judges in Wisconsin! Next million dollar award will be announced in 2 days.

    https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1905074338161942616

    The good news I suppose. Ben Wikler, chair of the Wisconsin Dems,

    Musk is now way over $20 million deep into his attempt to buy Wisconsin's Supreme Court. The direct effects of Wisconsin's majority will be enormous. But there's now another huge question at play: can Musk buy whatever election he wants? If Crawford wins, his perceived political power collapses.

    He's got to keep pushing on this because, now, he's so deeply tied to the outcome. If Schimel loses, Musk loses too. His need to win creates a huge vulnerability. And Schimel's attachment to him creates political weakness.

    https://bsky.app/profile/benwikler.bsky.social/post/3lldeev7bn22d

    • mpledger 4.1

      $100 to get email addresses of poorer Republican-leaning voters is a bargain. They probably fly below the radar and it's hard to get them out to vote and now they can be targeted and enraged into turning-out.

  4. Joe90 5

    Never forget.

    Darren Watson

    ‪@darrenwatson.bsky.social‬

    Today marks the 42nd anniversary of the 1984 Wellington Trades Hall Bombing where caretaker Ernie Abbott was killed. Still no one held accountable. 😢 #nzpol

    https://youtu.be/ehJhZMfr4pE?

    #nzmusichttps://bsky.app/profile/darrenwatson.bsky.social/post/3llcfvb5mms2r

    edit:
    Darren Watson
    ‪@darrenwatson.bsky.social‬

    Follow
    Obviously maths is not my strong point. It’s the 41st anniversary.
    March 27, 2025 at 9:28 AM

    • Patricia Bremner 5.1

      yes Good to remember.

    • Anne 5.2

      The trade union movement was donkey-deep in the anti-nuclear movement of the day and NZ was making international news on the issue. At the same time we had a drunken PM called Rob Muldoon who hated unions and was attempting to destroy them.

      Combine the two and NZ was becoming combustible. A group of persons saw the opportunity to kill two birds with one stone, and they planted the bomb in the hope of getting rid of some of the union ring-leaders? The plan was foiled because the meeting the ring leaders were to attend, was shifted to another venue? Ernie Abbott the care-taker became the victim instead.

      The police were talked into believing it was some anti-union loner responsible. A prime suspect was a former Public Service colleague of mine in the 1970s. I learned much later the police had harassed and intimidated him for years. He was incapable of committing such an act. He died a few years ago and as far as I know, he never received an apology for the way he had been treated.

Leave a Comment