Electric Shock

Written By: - Date published: 8:43 am, December 2nd, 2024 - 29 comments
Categories: climate change, Deep stuff, public transport, science, transport - Tags:

New Zealand is one of the slowest countries in the developed world to transition from combustion to electric vehicles. The shocks we are seeing in Europe to car makers and car buyers herald more trouble ahead.

This year about 10% of New Zealand’s new car purchases are some form of electric. Last year it was 27%. It’s not great. It’s expensive, subsidy or not. The electric cars on offer – until the Chinese makers arrive in bulk – are top-end ones like Tesla’s, Polestars, Ford Mustang’s and the like, to go with the solid base of second hand Toyota Prius hybrids and Nissan Leaf imports.

Some go-ahead entities like Auckland Transport are making a strong start to completely removing combustion engines from their fleet entirely – they are already there with trains, well on the way with buses, and their ferries are going electric as well.

To make sure we are living in political reality not just moaning and catastrophising about climate change, we only need to recall that when the Ardern government brought in the modest clean car discount scheme, it also put a fee placed on higher-emissions vehicles like utes and tractors, from January 2022. And the protest against it went nuts. The Clean Car Discount Scheme was to make lower-carbon-emitting cars more affordable for New Zealanders, paid with a fee placed on higher-emission vehicles, including utes, from January 2022.

In response, farmer action group Groundswell NZ organised ‘A Howl of a Protest’ in locations across the country in both July 2021 and in 2022.

Photo credit to RNZ of the 2022 Groundswell protest

Now we are seeing this kind of policy-driven protest play out across the whole of Europe.  

Car makers are struggling to adapt to the production of battery-electric vehicles, a transition Brussels is betting on as it prepares to phase out the production of combustion-engine cars by 2035. They are attempting to become the first climate-neutral continent. 

But car production in Europe is driven mostly by German car companies. That is deadly serious for Germany as one of its largest employers. Car making accounts for 7% of the entire European GDP. 

That’s something like telling New Zealanders that they can’t drink cow’s milk or cheese by 2035. That’s the scale of shock European car makers are going through now.

Like New Zealand, European registrations of electric cars dropped this year compared to 2023. Also, the total market for new cars is shrinking somewhat at the moment. In a recession you try and avoid major capital purchases when you’re trying to hold onto a job, got downsized to a lower one, or worse. A recent report suggested the 27-country bloc would need a €800-billion boost to support its clean energy transition and compete with increasingly aggressive global trading rivals.

In August, EU registrations of electric cars dropped by 43.9% compared to the same month in 2023, driven by an astonishing 68.8% decline in Germany, considered the bloc’s industrial powerhouse. 

Tariffs on the import of cheap, China-made EVs — which have recently flooded the EU market and driven down prices — are now in force and will last for at least five years. This is the EU trying to buy time for their manufacturers to catch up and generate cheap electric cars that can compete with the Chinese cheap ones that are surging through the world.  

In 2025 the EU legal limit for cars’ CO2 emissions will fall by 20% to 94 grams per kilometre. That pretty much wipes out new diesel vehicles. Manufacturers will also face annual targets for the emissions their vehicles produce, to incentivise the sale of zero and low-emissions vehicles.

The stress point will come in February 23 2025 when Germany has its snap Federal election. Volkswagen has demanded a 10% wage cut for 120,000 of its roughly 300,000 German staff. It is also threatening to close plants in Germany for the first time in its 87-year history. There will be a change of government, and with AfD on the rise it’s hard to see all of those EU regulations staying on current target.

Trade unionists of the metalworkers’ union IG Metall protest during a warning strike in front of the Volkswagen plant in Osnabruck. Photo: FOCKE STRANGMANN/AFP.

That’s a lot of mortgages, meals on the table, and votes.

New Zealand gets about 10% of its cars from Europe, but the crises going through European car makers are also going through our primary importer Japan where Nissan is close to collapse, and we’re mostly content with Toyotas which are at best hybrid

Toyota has little initiative to move to EV’s because EV’s require much less service, and that means their dealerships with service centres also lose massive amounts of profit every year. That means in turn those dealerships basically have to invent an entirely new business model to remain in business. In China, they are closing over 4,000 car dealerships a year. Volkswagen, BMW and especially Mercedes Benz make cars requiring continuous and very expensive (i.e. lucrative) servicing. So the motivation to change to EV’s is very low.

For those needing a new car and fortunate enough to have the wherewithal to consider buying one, the current overproduction of EV’s is generating dealership discounts that make it a good time to negotiate hard. Check out the latest electric Skoda Enyaq:

But back to the politics of this, the protest we saw here will seem small compared to what Europe is going through, and Japan will face similar as Nissan is stripped out for parts and Honda continues to lose market share across the world and shrinks to something much smaller.

The contest of the car is, for European and Japanese carmakers, a massive electric shock. And then it will hit here.

29 comments on “Electric Shock ”

  1. Champagne Socialist 1

    Not just EV's – generation of electricity is also transitioning towards renewables – solar in particular. But solar – like EV's – is cheap and does not provide labor intensive returns to the generators. Australia is 30% rooftop solar NZ is 2%. WA is building a solar farm big enough to meet all of Australia's power demand – NZ not so much.

    Countries that successfully transition to a much cheaper form of energy will gain massive competitive advantages.

    • Tiger Mountain 1.1

      Informative link, thanks CS.

    • alwyn 1.2

      "WA is building a solar farm big enough to meet all of Australia's power demand – NZ not so much."

      Would you have any qualifiers you want to add to that statement?

      If you were really to mean that they can, all the time, supply all the electric power Australia requires I would have to say that they are crazy, and that WA must be broke.

      • Champaign Socialist 1.2.1

        https://reneweconomy.com.au/wa-plans-huge-switch-to-solar-and-storage-as-part-of-stunning-50gw-green-energy-boom/

        Solar energy is now magnitudes cheaper than fossil fuel energy. This is not about saving the planet – this is pure economics.

        • alwyn 1.2.1.1

          That is only talking about Solar Power to help satisfy the WA needs. You extended this to claim that they were planning to supply the entire needs of the whole of Australia.

          They are totally different things and the Australian needs are, I would think, at least an order of magnitude greater than those for WA. There is also no way to get the power to anywhere outside WA. It has, as your linked article says, a stand-alone Grid which means they can't get any power generated to another state.

          Thus they would have to produce about 10 times more than they are planning and build transmission line to carry the power 3,000 km to the East Coast if they were going to do what you proposed.

          They would go broke if they tried to do anything on that scale

      • Drowsy M. Kram 1.2.2

        If you were really to mean that they can, all the time, supply all the electric power Australia requires I would have to say that they are crazy, and that WA must be broke.

        WA's Labour govt should listen to CLuxon – "It's a case of slower to go faster" smiley

  2. Mike the Lefty 2

    You didn't mention the Palmerston North urban bus fleet which has been 100% electric since March this year, first in NZ.

    Palmerston North may not be everybody's favorite city but is a relatively progressive place in some respects. Was also the first NZ city to have a fully urban CNG powered fleet in the 1980s. This is because they had leaders who looked forward rather than backwards.

    • tWig 2.1

      Palmy is a fantastic city with an extremely positive city council. They provide far more than nuts and bolts, work together across the political divide to deliver for the city, and have a thorough and transparent consultation process. They were also among the first of councils who voted to retain the Maori ward.

      You only have to look around at the well-maintained and innovative central city plantings, the quirky public statues, and the broad range of amenities carefully provided for us city-dwellers, in sports fields, parks and libraries. While maintaining a green policy, they also continue to develop social housing and support for policies helping poorer people, like food resilience funding for local volunteer groups.

      That said, the buses come from the Regional Council. I have been using them since they came in, and love their silent motion. So kudos to Horizons Council, too.

  3. Dennis Frank 3

    Google's AI Overview is more bullish:

    The electric vehicle (EV) market is expected to continue to grow…

    • In 2023, EVs made up 18.6% of global passenger vehicle sales, and the global electric fleet reached 40 million. In 2024, sales are expected to grow by 25% compared to the same period in 2023

    This globalist org thinks so too:

    Electric car sales in 2023 were 3.5 million higher than in 2022, a 35% year-on-year increase. This is more than six times higher than in 2018, just 5 years earlier. In 2023, there were over 250 000 new registrations per week, which is more than the annual total in 2013, ten years earlier.

    Electric cars accounted for around 18% of all cars sold in 2023, up from 14% in 2022 and only 2% 5 years earlier, in 2018. These trends indicate that growth remains robust as electric car markets mature. Battery electric cars accounted for 70% of the electric car stock in 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024/trends-in-electric-cars

    Here last month:

    As of the end of November 2024, there are over 79,000 fully electric light vehicles (plus around 34,500 plug-in hybrids)… 9.5% of new light vehicles were plug-in EVs https://evdb.nz/ev-stats

    So the market's growing at 3x the rate of inflation here in Aotearoa. That's robust.

  4. Adrian 4

    More problematic in NZ is the average age of our car fleet at something like 14+years and a large part of that is made up of second hand imports. We are careful consumers and don’t splash money on new cars, with the exception of show offs leveraging the mortgage which now is no doubt leading to a fair bit of sphincter clenching, so the catch-up period for everybody to own a new car to feed the EV target is a real problem and must go out to well past 2040. The only answer is to subsidise the cost of ownership through various schemes which Labour recognised last term.

    The answer probably does not lie with used import EVs either, as while the battery tech is now quite sophisticated the older stuff is well behind on range and to an extent reliability. A fiend has an older Nissan Leaf it has now a range of 72 kms which she has to manage carefully, here in the South Island 72kms won’t get you to the next town. That Japanese import market will disappear anyway as they don’t have many, if any, spare EVs as Nissan, Toyota et al put their chips down on hydrogen, one of the worst automotive industry decisions in history.

    Im doing my bit, I bought a new car last week, it’s 26 years old, so it has probably canceled the carbon input that went into its construction. Why didn’t I buy an EV? I would have liked to but who can afford one. We sunk what money we had on a roof full of solar panels instead.

    • AB 4.1

      …the average age of our car fleet at something like 14+years and a large part of that is made up of second hand imports. We are careful consumers…

      Yes. Careful because most of us have to be – as you say. I remember English work colleagues visiting in the late 1990's commenting with amusement that in NZ they had seen every model of car they had ever owned, and that their fathers had ever owned.

  5. Matiri 5

    We have just bought a plug in hybrid EV to replace a 12 year old ICE. There are very good deals to be had at the moment if you are able to take advantage of them. The PHEV is a used dealership demonstrator with 6000kms on the clock.

    We live in a small rural community 130kms from Nelson, close to the Alpine fault so range is important, also having the battery to connect up communication to the outside world when the big one comes. We have changed to a power retailer offering good night rates and reconfigured our entire usage to take best advantage. We are also considering solar panels (had them on previous house) but may need to paint or replace tin roof first!

  6. Jack 6

    Call them old fashioned, but the Australians take renewable electricity generation and carbon emission targets seriously. This is lead by their government and accelerated by business. The actively support projects where EVs' are part of the storage and transmission network.

    https://arena.gov.au

    https://reneweconomy.com.au/energy-insiders-podcasts/

    Leadership and inspiration sorely lacking here.

  7. lprent 7

    Currently we have an old ICE Caldina station wagon circa 2005, and a newer 2014 very peppy hybrid Fit (replaced a 2011 Fit hybrid that got drowned last year in the Auckland floods). Both brought second hand. Only reason we have two is to handle the odd time we either need wagon, or when we are both running around at the same time.

    Since we do somewhere between 5,000-10,000 kms per year across both cars. Neither guzzle gas so we'll replace them when they die or get unreliable. Probably without accidents – more than a decade away. They get serviced annually and maintained to reliable standard. Cars are a relatively minor operational cost for us. My operational budget for cars has the largest cost (by far) being the total cost of insurance against accidents or theft or breakdowns in awkward locations.

    This year by biggest car cost has been buying gear for them to transport bikes. Just looking at the horrendous cost of putting a towbar on the Fit for the bike rack! We have two e-bikes. Both for local, and also for just having exercise (I have a osteoarthritic large toe issue that makes walking even moderate distances painful).

    I do around 500-1500kms on bikes annually mostly based on weather conditions and holidays. Mostly I just bike around where I live. Sometimes hopping on a train and finding some bike paths in Auckland that I haven't been to. Or now dropping bike or two on the bike rack and doing a trail further away. Sometimes my partner comes to pace me. The side-trip to Paeroa was to have a look at biking the Hauraki rail trail early next year.

    For me, cars aren't the electrical investment I'd make. When we finally buy a house and move out of the apartment, I'll have roof space and no body corporate to constrain what I can do. We'd move because we need to two offices.

    But I'm planning on installing solar for power + wind for power + batteries + solar for hot water and probably dropping off the electrical grid.

    That is because our power bills are now averaging about $200/month over the whole year varying from $150 to $260. This is in a apartment that is nearly perfectly insulated, mostly runs computer systems for heating and has done so for a long time, doesn't do any aircond. The kW consumption has actually gone down over the same period despite having more computers and more devices because I've been actively replacing old electrical equipment with one that chew way less power. Plus encouraging sleep modes.

    I figure that the cost of electricity per kW/h for the two of us has risen by about 50% over the last 7.5 years in this apartment. I have to have batteries anyway in the form of UPS'es for critical equipment – ie computers. Have to replace their batteries every 18 months because they're lead-acid. That is because of the occasional outages. I'd like to add lights, TV, cooking, and hot water to that backup 🙂

    May as well go the whole hog and invest some capital to get rid of an otherwise unavoidable operational cost. It is likely to pay itself off and be increasingly cheaper to maintain and increase as prices drop.

    The line charges are now $1.38/day (up from 0.345/day in 2020). That is more than $500/year. That plus the cost of equipment (and its added complexity) to receive and feed AC power back to the network indicates that I should not be line connected at all.

    It is way too expensive as a insurance system. I'm pretty sure that I could afford a bigger battery system more cheaply.

    I'm discounting the idea of getting paid for feeding power to the grid because the power companies don't pay enough, the extra capital equipment is too costly, and anyway I think that almost everything could be done using DC.

    Computers are inherently DC, most of my devices are actually DC – they have AC to DC converted already, heating and cooling of all types is actually easier as DC, etc.. Local systems should be regulated DC. The only reason we use AC is because of transmission over low-tech grid line systems.

    • higherstandard 7.1

      Where did your car go swimming in the floods Lynn ?

      I was in Mt Eden the evening of the downpour and remember seeing cars looking like submarines, completely submerged in dips in the roads.

  8. Bearded Git 8

    The tariffs being put on EVs in Europe and the USA is pure luddite behaviour.

    It didn't go well for the luddites.

    The GWM Ora EV is now being sold for $30k in NZ.

    BYD which makes EVs and plug in hybrids in China outsold the Ford Motor Company in the last quarter.

  9. ianmac 9

    All of the contributions above are gratefully received. We are keeping the 24 yo Holden going as a workhorse/tow bar and aware that maybe I won't be driving much longer.

    I wonder if an all electric plug/in will be the future rather than a hybrid or an ICE.

    • lprent 9.1

      My dad is like that. 85, has a low kilometres Audi import that would now be about 14 years old. Doesn't drive that much any more and has the frequent driving tests.

      Not worth changing the vehicle.

      If I was buying a second vehicle in the next few years (can't think of a reason I'd buy new), I'd look at EV. same I have for the last 3 vehicles.

      But with our extremely small pattern of driving (neither of us commute), I suspect that the price difference would be too high. In particular where we are now, I'd have to look at wiring power 50 metres to our parking area in the garage.

  10. adam 10

    Cars, cars, and more cars. All the while creating a divide via peoples transport needs.

    It's fast becoming another class divide, what? Of those who can afford a car, to own, to run and to keep it street legal – on the other side those who can not. It is already the reality for many in the disabled community ( reminder tomorrow is international day of disabled)

    A large chunk of disabled can not afford to own their own car. Let alone afford the running costs. They are left with a Total Mobility Scheme which is faltering under this government, and or relying on public transport (which is sad joke for disabled people) or family and friends.

    How, just how can car culture carry on when most people are getting poorer? Why are we so reliant on a mode of transport which is effectively a tax collection gravy train for the gas and car manufacturing industry. The whole electric car industry is not much better.

    Last kick at electric cars, they are heaver right? Heavy vehicles cause more damage on the infrastructure? Same road user charges??!?

    Thanks for the post Advantage, got me grumpy in a good way.

    • lprent 10.1

      Last kick at electric cars, they are heaver right? Heavy vehicles cause more damage on the infrastructure? Same road user charges??!?

      Another dumbarse and widespread myth.. Ford Rangers, the most commonly sold ICE in 2023 with 9907 new units sold here – aussie site but we get the same here

      Kerb weight ranges from 1789kg for the single cab chassis XL to 2431kg for the Raptor.

      The largest common Telsa in NZ, a Model Y SUV selling 3936 in 2023

      Curb weight 4,154–4,404 lb (1,884–1,998 kg)[3][4]

      This doesn't account for the Ranger commonly carrying excess weight, enclosures, covers, and actual loads. Have a close look at Ford Rangers and find out how many don’t have addons that raise their kerb weight.

      Mot Rangers have a max laden weight of somewhere around 6000kg. ie about 3000-4000kg capacity. The Model Y has a loading capacity for just 433kg.

      If you look down the list of best selling ICE and EV vehicles – the ICE vehicles that are sold are at worst only as heavy in kurb weight as the SUV and light trucks that are the most common sold. But ICE have a much larger max laden weight.

      Weight is the killer of roads. But electric vehicles aren't the cause. The real cause are the stupidly small RUCs that are placed on laden trucks. They are the road wreckers, the source of potholes, and a drain on car-owners subsiding them.

      Truck RUC's need to be increased massively. Somewhere about 50x for ones with a laden weight of 30+ tonnes.

      Read the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_power_law

      What is the bet that this myth is perpetuated by fools doing odd comparisons.

      For instance one comparison I saw looked at a 1994 Toyota Corolla – one of the best selling sedans then. It had a kerb weight of 1060Kg.

      So they compared it to 2022 Telsa model 3 – base weight around 1500-1600kg.

      They didn’t compare it to a fully fitted out 2023 Toyota Corolla with a weight of 1800kg or even a minimal fitted out one with a weight of around 1300kg.

      Somehow they overlooked the most common ICE cars being sold (Corollas these days around 8th) like the RAV4 2WD – weight of 1550kg

      • adam 10.1.1

        Your assumption lprent was I thought the other heavy cars were OK. I don't think that – they should be held to account for their weight too.

        Yes trucks are worst of it all and get away with – that has the rest of us poor suckers paying for their weight and the damage it causes.

        That said, thanks for what you posted – bloody good analysis and adds more reason I loath cars as the dominate model of transport. It's the lies, bullshit, and myths these companies spin – especially against their competition. That hurt.

        • lprent 10.1.1.1

          My point was that there is no significiant kerb weight difference between the ICE and EV vehicles when you look at which ones are actually being sold into the countries vehicle fleets.

          The current common new 'sedans' and compact SUVs are all in the same general kerb weight range. 1500-1800kg for 4-5 passenger + some luggage. ICE or EV. The most common new vehicle of the bloody ICE light trucks who clog the sight lines and overfill the parking.

          When they finally get to produce EV trucks at scale, I suspect that we will find that the battery weight will be irrelevant – compared to the loads that all larger trucks carry.

          It's the lies, bullshit, and myths these companies spin – especially against their competition.

          Yeah. I tend to view my usual transport as being bike or electronic.

          But when you need to carry shopping from the supermarket, a Honda Fit is a better choice. You can select instore and are less likely to blow a tire than trying to carry a weeks groceries on on a bike.

          When you need to check on your dad 300km away, then it is way easier than trying to spend 12 hours crammed in a bus going there and back, or missing the puddle jumper because of roadworks on the way to the airport.

          But I treat cars like a tool or a computer. I get what I need functionally and leave the pretensions to the dick wavers.

          • adam 10.1.1.1.1

            Cars are very useful tool, but the dick waving with them can get out of hand.

            One big plus for electric cars without the motor and other guff in the way – It can be way more comfortable for the people inside. Was in a electric taxi recently which was very bloody nice.

            less likely to blow a tire than trying to carry a weeks groceries on on a bike

            I use taxi myself for groceries, for same reasons. I once bent all my back spokes with the weight on my saddle bags.

    • satty 10.2

      Last kick at electric cars, they are heaver right? Heavy vehicles cause more damage on the infrastructure?

      Depends how you look at it… a big car is a heavy car ICE or EV.

      The most sold cars here in NZ are heavy to start with

      • Ford Ranger (2,000 kg)
      • Toyota Hilux (2,300 kg)

      Some EV cars I can think of:

      • Tesla Model 3 (1,800 kg)
      • BYD Atto 3 (1,700 kg)
      • Polestar 3 – SUV (2,600 kg)
      • Tesla Cybertruck (3,000 kg) compared to get a similar over-sized ICE… RAM 1500 (2,700 kg)

      Not sure it makes too much of a difference…

      • lprent 10.2.1

        Trucks make the difference. Go down any two lane road built in the last decade on the left.

        The Waikato Expressway with its rough left surface and wave movement as your suspension gets a workout compared to the right lanes which have some surface issues and little wave motion. The trucks live in the left lanes and destroy them at a rapid rate.

        • satty 10.2.1.1

          Yep.

          Compared to the 45,000 kg a truck is allowed (or is it even more nowadays?), no car – ICE or EV – is in the same ballpark.

          • ianmac 10.2.1.1.1

            Truckies argue that the number of wheels on a truck determines the spread of weight. More wheels less "weight."

            A MOW bloke told me once a long time ago, sighting a road surface at eye level, shows a wave action like an unrolling carpet. The flexing does the damage. The bigger the truck, the bigger the damaging wave.

            • lprent 10.2.1.1.1.1

              Yep, that is in the power of 4 rule. But it is the weight on each axle that makes the effect.

              ummm examples from https://www.nzta.govt.nz/vehicles/road-user-charges/ruc-rates-and-transaction-fees/

              So spreading full weight 2000kg over two axles is just 1000kg per axle (most sedans).

              So spreading full weight 6000kg over two axles is just 3000kg per axle (ie a fully loaded Ford Ranger).

              A full bus with full weight 18,000kg with 3 axles is 6000kg per axle (that would be a very full bus).

              A truck with 3 axles and a full weight of 30,000kg is 10000kg per axle. Common li=ong distance delivery trucks

              A truck/trailer with 8 axles and a full weight of 44,000kg is 5600kg per axle. Those used to be the largest.

              A truck with 9 axles and a full weight of 60000 is 6667kg per axle (ie one of the ones with 'H'.)