Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
6:00 am, October 1st, 2024 - 65 comments
Categories: open mike -
Tags:
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
The UK is no longer burning coal for power.
A huge change in recent decades.
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/cpsprodpb/8db8/live/bacb9020-7f0d-11ef-b66d-034eed51208d.png.webp
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y35qz73n8o
'
NZ Cross Border international climate criminals:
Q: So why is NZ still burning coal for power? No change in recent decades.
A: Because burning coal keeps the spot prices up, increasing the profitability of the privately owned Gentailers.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:
Sure the answer is healthy homes – and beyond insulation, this includes solar panels and battery.
That and wind power – battery on the grid, reduces use of hydro dam power. And so this can be used less and provide spare low cost capacity (instead of the C of C plans for more expensive imported gas).
Innovation…and thinking outside the box. NZ is good at it. The present NACT1 govt with its determinedly anti Science and innate Climate denial notwithstanding. They like Dinosaur fuel..matches their Dinosaur brains
Also this. Is still a factor..
I think SPC that you are missing the point being made by Dave Hansford.
There is no shortage of innovative solutions to carbon emissions.
The roadblock is the profit driven gentailers.
What is really missing is the political will from our political leaders to regulate the profit driven polluters, who without regulation, will always prioritise their bottom line ahead of the public good or the protection of the environment.
"Top-down, one-way power monopolies must be replaced with active, equitable power-sharing local networks, with energy conservation as their central remit, not profit from production." Dave Hansford
Without government regulation of the privately owned gentailers, or the return to public ownership, none of the innovative solutions put up by you or PsyclingLeft, or even Dave Hansford himself, will ever be realised.
Or if they ever are, only after permanent irreversible damage to the climate is a reality, maybe not even then.
No.
Simply taking back ownership might not be electorally popular – the alternative is incentivising solar panel take up (as per healthy homes) – even requiring it of state housing and landlords. People get the benefit and at a much lower cost to the taxpayer than buying out shareholders.
The other matter is a regulatory requirement for power companies and Transpower to ensure stability via batteries to store wind power to reduce use of hydro.
Yes of course. But still, the point is this, and always has been, is that despite all these affordable, practical solutions for cutting emissions being available, despite all these available solutions, almost off the shelf – What is really missing is the political will to implement them.
This is the real nub of the problem.
Now the question is: how do we get over it, this lack of political will to take up these measures?
It seems as though something has gone wrong with the house designs in Auckland, which meet all of the healthy homes insulation targets. They're too hot. And now require air-conditioning/cooling to run during more than half the year.
Surely a massive own-goal for the planners.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/529228/some-newly-built-auckland-homes-too-hot-council-study-shows
For the developers and buyers perhaps but I doubt the onus is on planners to remind dopey pricks about how hot the sun is.
Not a building expert here, but surely it's the planners who set the rules for insulation and ventilation for new build houses.
Yup, lots of rules about insulation, heating, light penetration, ventilation, etc but afaik, not a sausage about how hot the sun is.
Planning for the current climate (let alone for increased warming), would seem to be a requirement.
Yep. The immediate environment around our houses is very important and has a symbiotic relationship to design and planning. Trees provide natural shade and cooling which would not be apparent in new build.
Not that Bananadonna has the capacity to consider that.
Design and planning is something which the CoC are keen to dispense with for what it's worth.
One interesting thing about tenancies is that because the profit motive is strong with amateur landlords, it's very important to cut all the trees down and have bare properties which are cheaper to manage, and fuck the stupid, weak tenants.
Western suburbs of Sydney.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12370879/Single-photo-exposes-huge-problem-facing-Australia-concerned.html
Designing and planning has resulted in this issue.
If you think that extensive tree planting is a feature of intensive housing in Auckland, you need a serious reality check. The planning process has resulted in rows of houses, jammed in tightly together, with minimal landscaping (let alone trees).
Have a look at the Kainga Ora new builds – not seeing many trees – or even much grass.
Ok, so you've pivoted away from suggesting the problem is insulation standards which is a National Party line (no surprise there).
Now it's the (council, I presume) planners fault, but nothing to do with developers cutting corners to maximise profit.
The thing is, if you want no mistake, liveable housing, more regulation and requirements are necessary rather than less.
I haven't said tree planting is a feature of MDH (you falsely call it intensive housing), but it needs to be.
The problem is that the insulation standards (with which I don't have an issue), were implemented without taking ventilation requirements (a much greater issue in Auckland and parts north), into consideration. A building standards fail.
Is there a difference in landscaping requirements for MDH or intensive housing? Seems to be much the same to me. Not that there is any space for trees or landscaping in any of the MDH around Auckland.
And, sadly for your argument, the highly regulated building standards, have resulted in less livable housing.
There is an urban planning issue. It is one of density. And is related to stormwater (where an area is too built up and has poor drainage) capacity.
It can occur with both higher density development, including large houses on small sections.
Basically the answer is less of the land being built on. More grass and trees.
Sydney has more serious issues (more heat than us).
https://www.landscapearchitecture.nz/landscape-architecture-aotearoa/2021/4/11/7lsk8ezuoko0g57gylbmj4q8yopwud
In Auckland it appears to be where the top level of duplexes get less shade and have to be designed and built with different features.
I'm sorry, but this is rubbish. The fact that upper floors get hotter is well known, and has been for hundreds of years. There's a reason why the servants were relegated to the top floors of houses in Victorian England.
What seems to have happened is rigorous insulation requirements were implemented, which were unaccompanied by planning for passive cooling. Creating upper-story rooms with windows which don't open (or only open a tiny amount, with no cross-flow) has resulted in heat-box bedrooms, which are unusable without air-conditioning. The cost of retro-fitting this into existing builds in significant; as is, of course, the ongoing electricity bill.
It's a planning failure.
What rubbish?
As I noted
That includes all sorts of issues. More grass and less housing on sections and the ability to plant trees. .
And this
Sure this has been a known since the 19th C.
One can guess the desire for more urban density is the reason, in this there is a building design issue/building criteria regulation factor.
And, my point. It's not an urban planning issue, it's a building planning one.
The link you gave 1.1.1.3 – says it is both.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/529228/some-newly-built-auckland-homes-too-hot-council-study-shows
Also the Talbot Steel Works in Wales creased steel production.
The Talbot Steel Works was the last to remaining Steel Works in the UK and it did specialise in steel armour plating for the Army & the manufacturing of steel for the RN Sub's among other high end steel production like rail tracks for High speed rail etc.
Tata's Indian owners … a bit like the Malaysians with their own mill and cheaper power closing down here.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/sep/11/blow-for-british-steel-industry-as-2500-jobs-go-at-port-talbot
The social investment approach
First principles
It is a diversion away from state provision.
A multi-contract system.
Healthy Homes is cited as an example of an approach which had multiple benefits.
(why Labour named social investment – by its purpose – Well Being, such as via Food in Schools etc)
Arthur Grimes noted
And thus of course Investment (for profit) partners are to be involved
A reactive dismissal of critics as from those focused on their ideology, rather than the focus of English-Willis on getting results.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/529489/social-investment-what-you-need-to-know
This will be great for businesses operating as consultants to government ministry (maintaining capacity with less of their own staff) – hiring up experienced and specialist workers who want to retain work from home rights.
One might well suspect a Ministry might well refers on workers disappointed by the government policy. Meeting staff cutback targets, if not saving any money overall.
And as the government loves going to non government organisations, everyone wins.
https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/09/30/hybrid-work-crackdown-may-not-work-as-intended-economist-warns/
Why on earth Key's opinion on the US election should be front page news is beyond me, but it is, and I held my nose and took the bait.
“I think he's better for the economy.”
“He's likely to embrace a bit more market. He's likely to have less red tape and he's certainly going to have lower taxes. So that bit is good.”
But Sir John still thinks overall Trump is still the better choice.
“Well he certainly wants lower taxes. He probably wants more market based solutions. He's probably got a freer energy policy. There's a whole lot of different things.”
So- tax cuts. Some things never change.
Sir John says Kamala Harris has economic views that are radically left-wing and that she’s more aligned with Senator Bernie Sanders than President Joe Biden.
"Radically left-wing"???
America- take him, keep him, let him vote there. And hopefully he'll revoke his NZ citizenship at the same time, and our media will stop the fawning.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350434743/why-sir-john-key-thinks-donald-trump-should-win-us-election
Sirkey has first and foremost represented International Capital and Finance Capital all his adult life, even while NZ Prime Minister…anyone remember the offshore Trusts debacle set up by his personal Lawyer? 10, 000 members of the parasite class departed virtually overnight once IRD required more than an A4 sheet on who was who, and other details of their trusts.
The beneficiaries of the orange tax cuts are pretty obvious, hence the Key support.
And sir Key …..
sir Key : money, is everything. That is all.
What stood out for me was Keys endorsement of trumps energy/climate change policies, trump would wind back laws put in place by Biden. Does Key not understand climate change? Under his governent NZ did FA about reducing emissions so he might not particularly care. Here's the point though Mr Key, without a solution to climate change we will have little or no economic growth, and more and more climatic shocks.
On another matter seemingly Casey Costello received "independent advice" on tax cuts for heated tobacco products. I am wondering who provided her that "independent advice", Rothamans or Pall Mall?
Only as something that prevents profit. IE money. His only reason to live.
Well, the flashing signs are pointing to Phillip Morris
The money only cares about more money and power.
Look at the outright crap musk is spreading on behalf of Trump, keys doing his bit as expected down here.
AKA red baiting. (surprised he didnt call her Marxist..or Commie!)
sir Key doing what he knows…and does best. Looking out for the money. Such a small character…..
Luxon's polling must be really bad if Key is being wheeled out to the media. He only comes out when Luxon needs a distraction.
No surprise nationals PR enablers (NZME) duly oblige with a soapbox.
Picture that locker room of herald opinionators Key, Joyce, Prebble Bennett…..need a shower ?
So he can put the boot into the reds under the bed if course, !!
This is Chris Luxon's favourite government and his model for governance.
James Butler's piece in the LRB on the Grenfell fire is a searing indictment of modern neoliberal Britain and well worth a close read.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v46/n19/james-butler/this-much-evidence-still-no-charges
So much of the story leaps out as giving a coherence to the otherwise inchoate coalition currently governing NZ. In particular it highlights the global problem of the paranoia and deep unseriousness representative of the collapse of modern conservatism. Modern conservatism regards any kind of expertise as by definition a sort of special interest capture, so a minister can characterise his department’s officials as "…Guardian-reading pinkos…" (a similar attitude seems to define this government's attitude to the civil service) despite also observing that "…whatever their views were, they acted in line with (the governments) antipathy to ‘regulatory madness’…" and signalling the complete acquiescence and colonisation of the senior civil service by neoliberal conservative acolytes "…thoroughly acclimated to (their) department’s culture…"
The collapse of the MSM is also canvassed: "…The kind of local journalism that might have uncovered and campaigned against the problems at Grenfell… …is long dead…" and "…At the BBC, Kate Lamble produced a detailed weekly podcast throughout the hearings, though its insights rarely seemed to make it across to the corporation’s main news programmes. In an act of managerial malfeasance typical of the BBC, Lamble was made redundant a day or two after the inquiry reported…"
The whole piece is a meta-condemnation of the utterly exhausted late capitalist neoliberal project, a tired and discredited ideology so ingrained in the political and media class that it is difficult to "…‘make the water visible’. The phrase comes from the old story of one fish asking another ‘What’s water?’, a way of talking about conditions so pervasive they can no longer be perceived…"
What Chris Hipkins thought he could learn from talking to Kier Starmer – "a technocrat without a plan" https://unherd.com/2024/09/keir-starmer-a-technocrat-without-a-plan/ who project seems to largely consist of a continuation of the Conservative with austerity somehow done better and who was elected largely by gaming the first past the post electoral system and is surrounded by radical centrist liberals and grifters, is anyone's guess.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o
It would have been worse without the inheritance tax receipts – now quickly rising – likely to be a good earner as the baby boomers die off.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/284325/united-kingdom-hmrc-tax-receipts-inheritance-tax/
Inheritance tax – 40% above £325,000.
https://www.gov.uk/inheritance-tax
John Keys' support of Trump is not surprising.
Nor Jacinda Adern's support for Kamala Harris.
I have a suspicion neither Key's nor Ardern's comments will decide the US Presidency
Biden's inability to alter Israel's direction towards multi-front war looks now at least as bad as Obama's loss of Syria to Russia and Iran, or Trump's loss of Afghanistan to the Taleban.
Hey Biden, with that volume of both aid and arms you are sending to Israel, who is the dog and who is the tail?
So close to the election, no party / candidate can work (fight) against the interests of AIPAC – American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Actually, it doesn't really matter much, if the election is close or not. You won't make it far in US politics if you piss-off AIPAC.
When has Syria not been in the Russia/Iran camp (since the Shah at least)?
The loss of Afghanistan was bi-partisan (and a mistake).
The western regime changes – removing secular left governments in Iran 1950's Afghanistan 1980's, Iraq and Libya 2000's and the failed one in Syria, as much one by Gulf states were wrong (and resulted in crimes against humanity).
The current problem in the region is that Iran has created a coalition front to destroy the Israeli state***. This is exploited by Israel as a cover for its WB occupation. This is a reprise of the 5 army war on the "1948 state" that prevented "the two states" being established at the same time.
A decision made earlier this year is pertinent.
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/arab-league-ceases-labeling-hezbollah-terrorist-organization-/3261610 ***
For mine, the path forward is where the Arab League was to
1.persuade Iran to support a state of Israel within 1948-67 borders
2.get Hamas to do the same and join the PLO.
3.agree to work with the PA to control the Egypt-Gaza border and internal security within Gaza. This to facilitate future PA elections.
Otherwise the Israeli public will not divide from BN over the reaction to ***.
Assessment
a.BN is moving to ops vs Hezbollah and Iran (away from Hamas) to legitimise the WB occupation.
b.He has Biden snookered, because of support in the US for Israel – thus his focus is containment and winning the election.
c.BN expects to be restrained by Biden once the election result is known.
This NY Times headline sums up the United State's myopia and tunnel vision in relation to Israel to Israel:
"…Why the World’s Biggest Powers Can’t Stop a Middle East War
The United States’ ability to influence events in the Mideast has waned, and other major nations have essentially been onlookers…."
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/29/world/middleeast/middle-east-war-peace-nasrallah.html
As it turns out, the story author is personally deeply embedded into the trans-Atlantic project and it's unquestioning support for Israel – which is why he can apparently discuss the inability of the United States to influence Israel anymore whilst casually mentioning the United States has provided over ten billion dollars of weapons to Israel is the October 7th attack with seemingly being able to connect any dots.
Bit hard to stop what they've been defacto aiding and abetting for decades with military support.
So much support its on par with US forces capability as agreements mandate they get all the latest weapon's and missile defence systems.
Then theres the West Bank where even Ben and Jerrys have made a stand.
Even Reagan got so pissed off with Israeli entitled attitude that he yelled at PM Menachem Begin and told him to stop bombing Beirut. When the US president yells at you, as opposed to bear hugs at every opportunity, along with continuesd assurrance that "we" stand by you whatever, its likely the next step is cessation of aid and arms.
Israel ceased bombing Lebanon the next day.
Biden hasn't even tried, or more likely, is comfortable with the current escalation because it fits with maintaining US hegemony. The iron fist making a statement.
1919 Britain steals Palestine as France and Britain divi up the spoils after WW1.
Britain had been invading and stealing countries all around the world 300 years.
1948 Jews illegally invade and illegally occupy Palestine driving Palestinians out.
1950 USA establishes a huge military base in Israel to dominate 400 million Muslims.
All opposition to illegal Jew invadsion is brutally punished by USA backed Jews.
West supports Jewish genocide against Muslims but opposes Russian invasion.
Western political hypocrisy knows no bounds.
1.Off whom? As a LofN mandate to develop the area for self government?
2.The British empire was not the first, nor the last, to occupy territory.
3.The IDF of 1948 was made up of settlers in Palestine. There are 2 million Arab citizens in Israel within the recognised 1948-49 border Israel today. All Jews living in the WB and Gaza were driven out by the armies of Egyptian and Jordan.
4.Where was the 1950 base located?
5.How do these US Jews punish the opposition you refer to?
6.Yes the West opposes the attempt by one state Russia to take land off another Ukraine, as they did in Kuwait (by Iraq).
Only one western nation has supported the annexation of the Golan Heights by Israel. the USA. Who supports the seizure of Abkhazia and South Ossetia and Crimea by Russia?
7.Hypocrisy is everywhere.
Chris frickin wealthy Luxon….
Just to repeat..he's wealthy.
And yet..
Yep Chris..you are indeed a frickin example.
Wealthy people coming into government of a nation – the only one without a CGT in the OECD and one of only 12 (of 36) with no estate or inheritance tax.
The Greeks had the rich bribe the city by promising to spend their own money to get elected.
Do no harm medical practice as well.
I have zero problem with people who are rich, and that's coming from someone at the bottom of the food chain. Unless that money came at the expense of low paid workers, the environment, house hoarding or crime/dishonesty.
I take issue with rich people who don't even pretend to understand how it is for everyone who, for whatever reason, were not ever going to amass that sort of money, and take that 'well if I can do it..' attitude.
And who lose all concept of reality because they are immune to everyday financial struggles.
And who brag about it.
kind of my point….
Two things to add, those who are wealthy and prepared to pay a fair share of tax – eg a CGT on currently untaxed income – and who do not try and hang onto or enhance their power/privilege with false arguments and divisive campaigns like we are seeing from the neoliberal act/brash types and proxies.
That too
I like how he still sees himself as some kind of reincarnation of John Key, as if the comparision’s apt.
“Now I'm moving in, and I don't need the apartment, so I’m selling it. That’s what John Key did when he became prime minister.”
And, Luxon's such an unaware brown-noser, he probably doesnt realise sir Key really wishes he wasn't the heir apparent . Or even thinking same….
Luxon bragging about his wealth. Up thread there's a link to a stuff interview with Key also published today. Key is sitting in front of his helicopter, another demonstration of wealth.
To obtain a pilot's license there's quite a bit of science study involved; meteorology & gas flow etc etc. During his infamous BBC interview with Stephen Sackur in 2011 he claimed scientists were like lawyers, he could always pay someone else for a different opinion. I'm hoping his flying examiner only accepted answers based on conventional science.
That Key thinks Trump's the best person for the job "because of the economy" is a disgrace, too.
He says that he wants to add back to the country, which is an interesting choice of words.
What he does tell us is that he’d like to ‘add back’ to the people who enabled him to become wealthy, such as frequent-flying landlords and shareholders. What he’s also saying is that wealth creates wealth and that this is ok and the natural way of how things ought to work. What he really means is that inequality and inequity are part of the natural order and that the wealthy have earned every penny through enablement, entitlement, and embellishment. In other words, he smokes his own dope, which is why he supports the smoke & mirrors by Costello, BTW.
Yea, the more that I know of Luxon and the NACT1 creeps, the more I see some quite disturbing elements of Social Darwinism : "Bottom Feeders" , less social welfare and help services / more prisons and punishments , Race baiting as a distraction / diversion whilst also destroying equality , and more….
I hesitate to call them evil….and maybe Dystopian… but IMO there is an element of that banality in them..that has lead to terrible things.
As I have said though, I see a lot of people protesting, being counted upon, and standing together. This is how we beat them.
Banality, order, evil – it sounds you’re echoing Hannah Arendt.
When I went Social Darwinism..there it was. Elements anyway.
Anyway,unstable as they are, they might well have over-reached. Nice thought : )
NZ is not yet a banana republic and politicians get voted in by a mass of compliant supporters & voters. This is where the banality resides.
Tsar Poots' imperial war of conquest and colonisation.
Гюндуз Мамедов/Gyunduz Mamedov
@MamedovGyunduz
Ukrainians who live in the occupied part of Luhansk region but refuse to receive 🇷🇺 passports will be included in the register of foreigners from January 1, 2025. Being included in this list will result in restrictions on receiving almost all payments, social and administrative services, such as banking, property registration and enrollment of children in educational institutions. This is part of a campaign aimed at forcing passportization of 🇺🇦 citizens.
https://x.com/MamedovGyunduz/status/1840384174068228601
#Russification
This is part of a campaign aimed at forcing passportization of Unrainian citizens.
The choice being, no longer being citizens in their own homes and towns and eventually, facing displacement and forced expulsion, as foreigners. (Just like Palestinians, except that Palestinians don’even get that choice).
Blue Sky Sunflowers