SPC...your being deliberately obtuse Throughout this ukraine debate. The end of the cold war saw the end of the threat..thus there is NO need for nato to exist anymore. Of course nato will give a reason for its existence when it's in its own interest to ...
You know it's FUNNY that posters like SPC have to revert to bs barbs like internal Chinese policies or name calling of medea Benjamin than actually look in the MIRROR. Of course..any bs narrative will do to continue the pro Nato existence propaganda. The ...
Funny. I don't remember all this keyboard warrior wars in 2003... ...oh that's right..I do! In the form of over 1 million taking to the streets of London marching against Bush's invasion. But I don't remember placards saying: If U.s invades sanction them ...
For something more recent go to mearsheimers famous 2015 lecture: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4&t=3557s&pp=ygUYTWVhcnNoZWltZXIgMjAxNSB1a3JhaW5l Bucharest 2008 Nato summit..more recent than 1996 is the red line. MINSK TALKS were attempts to ...
Your right the answer is quite simple..the U.S.A can fool them into being Proxies for their anti Russia agenda when the inevitable reaction comes. That way..the Military Industrial Complex of Raytheon,Lockheed Martin etc can makes $$$ out of U.S taxpayers...
Scud..here's some reading for you.. A 1996 NY Times article explaining why NATO expansion is madness. https://www.nytimes.com/1996/10/25/opinion/wrong-time-to-expand-nato.html
Good..I will read it.. But the point still stands. The situation has changed because the NATO has given the green light to attack Russian territory. Up until this announcement the area in dispute was dombass..thus fighting should be there. This is clearly ...
Just LOL Scud.. Let's apply your logic to the Cuban missile crises....... Kennedy starts addressing the USA public over activities in Cuba (How dare they...Cuba is a sovereign Nation that can do whatever the hell it wants..clearly it is Not a Threat). ...
While your point about Clark is well noted..and prescient...it actually proves my point that millions...sorry billions of people on this planet are so brainwashed by u.s propaganda over having to take sides. Why does 5 eyes exist at all..or nato..or any ...
Res publica...still no argument as to WHY we must choose sides. You extend speculation over events within Chinese borders...to actually create your own "ChInA bAD" narrative. As for threats..as early as 1995 Clinton Green lighted full US navy exercises off...
Selling off a large volume of those houses (say 30000) would correct the books.
Quote:in a world where sitting between them is no longer a valid option: who do we choose? Proves you are brainwashed. Which Side is brazil on..or south africa? Or the Amazonian Indians? You haven't argued why the narrative is correct...just continued the ...
An exceptional op...thought provoking. Ukraine is the key example. Nato expansion from 92..nuland cookie inspired cou 2014...Bucharest summit 2008 for nuclear weapons on Russian border...how did Oct 61 go with the roles reversed?...and yet after lies like ...
In the movie V ..Hugo weaving character is introduced by circumventing the national broadcasters security....eg the media is completely controlled by the completely corrupt govt...very 1984. Natalie Portmans character..evey..is needed to do this. https://m...
It's called Neutrality..like India. This post is...I think..the best Op yet..thought provoking and prescient. Who supplied weapons to Saddam to kill invaders in 2003.. who defended Serbia in 1999..was afghanistan 2001 justified?...oh that's right..it never...
It's called Neutrality..like India. This post is...I think..the best Op yet..thought provoking and prescient. Who supplied weapons to Saddam to kill invaders in 2003.. who defended Serbia in 1999..was afghanistan 2001 justified?...oh that's right..it never...
You make an excellent point about blinken and Taiwan spc. I am looking at it from a military standpoint. Your right ..it seems china is just as guilty as the u.s in this regard. My question would be better phrased...if Taiwan chose neutrality with no ...
When soviet union retracted to Russia in 91..a set of buffer states were created..roughly a distance between Berlin and minsk. As these buffer states defaulted to neutral the demilitarization produced new hope. Russia itself still existed with 17 odd Sq km...
The Cuban missile crisis revealed in full view to the world how ridiculous u.s.a stance is on international affairs. By u.s logic ...Kennedys blockade was totally illegal and should have been rammed. By u.s logic...mercenaries can travel to Iraq March 03 ...
Spc.. Your responses appreciated. But the real question is how do 3rd parties React to invasions not involving them. The un was set up to solve diplomatically Nato... https://www.nytimes.com/1997/02/05/opinion/a-fateful-error.html https://en.m.wikipedia....
Some good responses SPC. But the overall points I made are not addressed. A) I just used oil as a substitute for grain in The article...the point being that the invaders (u.s.a) weren't put in that position because precisely and ironically the war was ...
The article makes some interesting points about inflation..just the blatant russiaphobia displayed is highly disturbing. Many "claims" are just speculation. a ) I don't remember usa doing a deal with iraq govt owned oil companies to "keep supplying" ...
GEE..how naughty of an editor to change a pro-Washington slanted bias article masquerading as journalism. By printing the reverse narrative...simply proves how difficult it is to find any objective print.
That is the point precisely.. Of course I don't Condone putin invasion..just like I didn't bushes. The point is...when Bush invaded I Didn't support weapons to saddam. By your logic..u support weapons to saddam to escalate =quagmire war The World minus 4 ...
Giving weapons to zelensky is to kill russians is the right thing to do.....according to you.. thus giving weapons to saddam to kill Americans is right and just by your logic.
Oh I get it..so punish countries impersonating US and nato behaviour?
Oh..you mean like Bush saying "mission accomplished" on May 1 2003..where he can then steal trillions in oil. Your not addressing the question....Neutrality is the default. .what justification for intervention? By your own logic..china russia and Iran give...
Interesting take on a complicated and largely, actually FULLY..NOTHING TO DO WITH US..situation.. so...why are we picking sides would be a good question...and somewhat staggeringly...why is neutrality regarded as some kind of dirty word in the mass media. ...
Deescalation happens by arming the Iraqis and driving the Americans out
I made a claim...so need to back it up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons I also found a gem to example the use of questioning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeWHviwLMy8 so why is mccain in ukraine with asov? who is enemy?...
I've been reading quite a few of the comments u.s.n.a.t.o sending weapons to ukraine. Nato and the United States didn't have to get involved in this conflict at all. The fact is as of feb 24 2022..ukraine was not in nato. When USA invaded Iraq, did China ...
Recent Comments