Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
5:30 pm, March 1st, 2023 - 17 comments
Categories: Daily review -
Tags:
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Me
Sir Anand Satyanand
Queen Elizabeth II
King George VI
Neville Chamberlain
Adolf Hitler
https://twitter.com/aledornell/status/1629969858598248448
If Warren Gatland has meet the queen I'm all good,
The magic of Google says he has
In response to ghost who walks concerning my less than complimentary remarks about our incompetent auckland mayor on open Mike 27/2
You replied refuting my assertions, as I read through them, I thought we can have an interesting discussion here. But, without any evidence, explanation or rationale you ended your diatribe with the sentence. "You are clearly a dork". .
Well, fuck face, let's play this game, I would really like to meet you face to face. So as I can give you a serious smack in the mouth.
I know, I know the mods won't like this language. They abhor physical violence of any description. Instead of a short sharp bit of pain they are good as with long term mental grief. Go figure.
This is your Mod note:
Despite knowing this site’s policy on violence, you chose self-martyrdom, which is very disappointing. You should read the Policy (https://thestandard.org.nz/policy/#banning) and specifically this part:
It is also disappointing that you referred to the wrong Post and did not link to the alleged comment (https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-28-02-2023/#comment-1937125). Why didn’t you reply to the actual comment?
Ghost’s reply to you was within the boundaries of robust debate and his alleged insult of you was at the lower end of severity and in the context of your comment that Ghost was replying to – you did set the tone.
FWIW, Ghost is a Wayne Brown apologist, which is not a ‘crime’ or a bannable offence here on TS, and serving a one-month ban for insulting others, disrespecting moderation, and disrespecting other commenters through unclear and pointless comments that he refuses to clarify and/or elaborate on when asked.
Anyway, I don’t understand your last sentence about the bit of pain and mental grief and I hope you can explain this to me in a few words. It is your chance to escape a one-month ban for blatantly violating this site’s explicit policy on violence. Either way, if you violate it again you will receive an instant medium-long ban without warning and without a chance to wriggle your way out of it.
I look forward to your explanation and put some effort into it, please.
Mod note here: https://thestandard.org.nz/daily-review-01-03-2023/#comment-1937312.
Farrar watch:
On Heather Stupidity-Allan's 1ZB segment, 'The Huddle', David Farrar was discussing a poem about colonisation which celebrates the murder of Captain Cook. The (brown) poet had received public arts funding. ACT and the TPU obviously were furious about this and were complaining bitterly throughout their mouthpiece who sound drunk to be honest.
Farrar used his go to argument that if you swapped the races and a publicly funded white poet celebrated the murder of brown historical figure, imagine the outrage! This is the test Farrar applies to all race issues it seems.
But the argument is not complete without swapping the races right from the point of colonisation. You can't just conveniently swap them now. So it should read imagine if an indigenous white people had 95% of their land stolen by brown invaders who then imposed their version of society resulting in appalling health and incarceration stats for the disenfranchised colonised.
How would the poem look then?
Further to, and in context of Sanctuary's excellent comments on Feb 24…
Heather Stupidity-Allan watch:
HADP today interviewed the woman who organised the meeting where pitchfork brandishing racists in Esk Valley lied about gun shops running out of weapons.
The Police are sending a bus/caravan and HADP sarcastically asked her if it made her feel safe. Shyly, she replied it did because it's going to be parked at the only current entrance to Esk Valley. Inference being it kept brown people from Hastings out.
HADP ran with that suggesting it was checkpoint, but the woman explained Coster had told them it was to help people report any crime. Woman then further showed her true colours saying the Police have it about face, and if they kept "these people" out there would be no need to report crime.
Inference being white people in Esk Valley should be entitled to official police protection and gatekeeping against Hawkes Bay Maori.
Extreme US-style Christian conservatism rears its very ugly head at Avondale Library:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/distressing-police-called-as-queer-community-targeted-by-protest-at-auckland-library-drag-reading/UTQGWO5IHBBKLHVZ4NA4J6KBAQ/
And every accusation is a confession.
https://imgur.com/t/every%20accusation%20is%20a%20confession
It is a pathetic reflex to pretend that sex abuse is only a problem associated with clergy. How about looking in our own back yard,. NZ has nothing to be proud of.
Exposed: Human trafficking happening right here in NZ – NZ Herald
"Drag queen story hour" is not a neutral act. It is (like drag itself) deliberately provocative and transgressive. In other words trolling the "squares". Libraries do not seem like an appropriate place for inflammatory political or religious posturing.
https://www.gaysagainstgroomers.com/post/drag-pedagogy-grooming-by-any-other-name
🚩🚩🚩
https://twitter.com/wesyang/status/1630654244695973893?s=20
Three red flags. A tweet by an unhinged twitter rabbit-holer referencing:
Do better, mate. You are better than this shit.
That is exactly the same mindset behind the Catholic church’s cover-up of its abusive clergy. It is hard to accept that our idols are just made of clay
I agree with Gordon Campbell:
http://werewolf.co.nz/2023/03/gordon-campbell-on-the-sacking-of-rob-campbell/
Since I was a part of the Public Service for a good many years in one capacity or another I knew the reality. There was no such thing as neutrality.
Thanks for highlighting this Anne. Was thinking similar the other day when I said there are infinite ways public service heads act politically behind closed doors. They do it every second of every day in the shadows.
Quite refreshing to see Rob Campbell tear all that up, speak transparently, and speak for the people Labour should be representing.
I listened to Rob Campbell on RNZ this morning being interviewed by Kim Hill.
Since then I have been mulling on how best to lend weight, support or tautoko his sentiments.