Guest post: Why the left needs feminism II

Written By: - Date published: 7:17 am, February 1st, 2011 - 172 comments
Categories: equality, feminism - Tags:

Yesterday Queen of Thorns laid out her thoughts on how the left lost touch with feminism. Today she’s talking about how to get the whole rigmarole back on track.

Part Three: identity politics kicked Chris Trotter’s dog

But don’t think Trotter reserved his scorn just for tino rangatiratanga:

[The] ideological roots [of “knee-jerk liberal orthodoxy”] descend into the swamp of identity politics and the New Social Movements which were at that time engaged in tearing apart the complex web of personal and political relationships that made up the traditional labour movement.

Trotter is speaking about the 1980s, that golden age of namby-pamby identity politics when the left got distracted by piffling little side issues like whether men should be held accountable for raping their wives and whether gay men should be allowed to be gay.

A time when the Left wasn’t, to quote Phil Goff’s own advisor John Pagani on that thread, “connecting with things that matter to people”. You can probably draw your own conclusions as to the kind of people he means.

I must admit to some naivety, because it came as a bit of a shock to me that identity politics could so easily be divorced from leftwing thought and cast as unrelated to the struggle against capitalism.

I mean, what is sexism if not a manifestation of capitalist reliance on women’s unpaid labour and reproductive capacity? (More on this in a later post, methinks.) And what is racism if not another handy way to separate out one sector of society to be exploited for their labour, all wrapped up in “science”? What is ableism if not driven by capitalism’s need for the most “productive” labour at the lowest cost and accommodation? How is enforcing heterosexuality and strict gender roles not about ensuring an increasing population to fuel the capitalist eternal-growth pipe dream?

(I certainly don’t want to imply that capitalism is the be-all and end-all of these oppressions, see previous “we’ll let you make speeches when the revolution is over, kitten” commentary.)

But nope, apparently these issues and concerns and theories were all just chaff getting in the way of the real workers’ struggle and the things that matter to people.

Again.

To quote myself:

[W]hen two guys get in a huddle and start slanging against the Liberal Left and the evil distraction of identity politics, and whinge about how we need to think about ordinary people, I think we can make a few very good guesses as to the kind of people they’re talking about.
And I’ll give you a hint: it ain’t you or me, assuming you are not a middle class white heterosexual cisgendered currently able bodied male.
Because here’s what matters to me:
It matters to me that I not be passed over for a job or a promotion because I’m a woman who’ll obviously just leave to have babies.
It matters to me that I have the right to be paid the same as a man for doing the same work.
It matters to me that gay men and women can have their relationships recognised by the state just like every two-in-three-chance-of-divorce hetero couple.
It matters to me that people of colour not get pulled over by the cops because brown people shouldn’t be driving expensive cars, or are obviously on drugs because they’re brown, or not be played by white people in movies about their lives.
It matters to me that people with disabilities can travel on aeroplanes, and get into buildings, and pass exams at school (look out for that incredibly-expletive-filled-post tomorrow!) and go shopping without worrying some bastard’s going to throw them out for having a hearing dog.
It matters to me that trans people shouldn’t have to worry about being murdered because someone else feels they have the right to judge what defines a man or a woman.
It matters to me that people should be able to practise their faith without fear of persecution, and that people not-of-faith should be able to say so without harassment.
But fuck all that! That’s just identity politics! That’s just me assuming that the way people identify, the way society wants to identify them, the assumptions others feel free to make about you because of your identity or assumed identity, might actually affect people! It might actually rate a bit higher on their List Of Things That Pissed Me Off Today:
1. Harassed on bus by guy who wouldn’t leave me alone.
2. First question asked at job interview: “Do you have kids?”
3. Threatened with sexual violence by blog commenter.
4. Still alienated from means of production.

TL;DR: when a capitalist society chooses to force identity markers on you to aid in its goals, the shit you get for having those markers is probably going to be a bit relevant to your interests.

Part Four: how’s that centre vote treating you?

Going by Chris Trotter’s figures, the choices are between sucking up to the “5,000” nasty liberal left bastards who want to ruin everyone’s fun or bringing back the “150,000-200,000” voters who went over to National last election.

The assumption being, of course, that they did so because whinge cry nanny state nasty feminists etc.

Or it could be something to do with a notion roundly accepted and bemoaned on leftwing blogs at the time – the idea that the voting public just thought it was “National’s turn”. Or to quote a certain teacher in my family, “at least we expect to get screwed under National”. Or simple voter fatigue with a front bench of far-too familiar faces with too much baggage attached. Or the eternal tax-cuts bribe which probably seemed to make a lot more sense with 9 years of healthy surpluses dimming the traumatic memories of the last National government. Or fuck it, maybe a lot of people do just think John Key is a nice down-to-earth chap.

Nah, probably just the evil feminist cabal chased them away with our brooms.

But if the question is “why did a bunch of traditional Labour types vote for a cuddly, definite-statement-free-zone John-Key-led National” one is really struggling to think of why anyone in Labour thought the answer was “because they wanted some more of that uncuddly strong-statement Don-Brash-led-National type racism”.

And when your answer to anything is “make ourselves more like John Key” it doesn’t matter what the question is, you’re probably just fucked.

Conclusions

So, leftwing men being douchebags who refuse to consider the distinct oppressions suffered by other, not-them groups of people have managed to drive a lot of natural allies away. Natural allies who surprisingly don’t take it well when told that shit that affects them every day of their lives isn’t that important. Most recently in NZ this has been done by the Labour Party because everyone wants a piece of the elusive, self-contradicting “centre” vote. And as we approach a general election, a heck of a lot of good liberal-yet-still-left people just don’t know what the fuck to do to set things right.

Here’s a few ideas.

Stop buying into the idea that acknowledging the actual harms suffered by actual people is “polarising” or “distracting”. All it does is signal loud and clear to women and Maori and queer folk that they are expected to once again sacrifice themselves For The Good Of The Left. We’ve already seen how that kinda doesn’t work out so well.

Acknowledge where relevant that if you are white, male, cisgendered, currently able-bodied, living above the poverty line, and reading this post online and in vivid Technicolor, you have privilege. Probably another post in that concept because I’m just so sure a few types will refuse to get it.)

If you want to throw around concepts and slogans like “for the many, not the few” try to bloody well remember that the “few” in that should be the people on the top of the heap, not the bottom.

If you want to make any kind of political play on a platform of fairness and ability/need and compassion and social justice it might fucking help to do some social justice.

And when the Right (and your own mainstream commentators) decide to attack you for focusing on “fringe” elements or “irrelevant” issues, you just look those bastards in the eye and say “Our society should be free and fair for everyone. No one should be attacked or discriminated against just because of who they are. We are doing this because we care about people, even though some of them will still vote against us for other reasons or even though they’re already a part of our core vote or even though their votes won’t make a difference in the election. It’s the right thing to do and we are going to do it because all New Zealanders deserve to live in the kind of country that takes care of its people.”

Just remember: an issue may not be important to you. But if you’re on the Left you better be motivated by something more than what you fucking get out of it.

172 comments on “Guest post: Why the left needs feminism II”

  1. cardassian 1

    Just read part 1 and 2 together.
    Awesome posts QoT, definately needed to be said as well.

    • QoT 1.1

      Thanks cardassian. To all commenters, as per yesterday won’t be able to answer comments till evening-time (the curse of a job where I don’t want to out my pseudonym).

  2. SjS 2

    Nice post … am looking forward to the post on ‘privilege’ as well

  3. just saying 3

    …And when your answer to anything is “make ourselves more like John Key” it doesn’t matter what the question is, you’re probably just fucked”

    I wish the Labour front bench and their senior advisors would chant this as a mantra. News flash – it’s been a dismal failure and will continue to be. And you’re just not getting that! When will you get it?

    If you want to throw around concepts and slogans like “for the many, not the few” try to bloody well remember that the “few” in that should be the people on the top of the heap, not the bottom

    Amen sister. The phrase can make me incandescent with rage for exactly this reason.

    you just look those bastards in the eye and say “Our society should be free and fair for everyone. No one should be attacked or discriminated against just because of who they are….

    …It’s the right thing to do and we are going to do it because all New Zealanders deserve to live in the kind of country that takes care of its people.”

    This must be the way forward. Enough of the machiavellian shit – how about some sincerity. Rod Donald was a master-class in this kind of approach to heckling and derailing.

    Because if this isn’t Labour, and this isn’t the left, what the fuck is?

  4. Rosy 4

    ‘A time when the Left wasn’t, to quote Phil Goff’s own advisor John Pagani on that thread, “connecting with things that matter to people”.’

    It may just surprise him that some of us can deal with capitalist inequalities and identity politics at the same time. We can also throw in a little thought about international issues at times.

  5. Carol 5

    I must admit to some naivety, because it came as a bit of a shock to me that identity politics could so easily be divorced from leftwing thought and cast as unrelated to the struggle against capitalism.

    Well, there is at least one version of feminism that doesn’t involve a struggle against capitalism. I guess that’s why some people talk about feminisms more than feminism.

    Liberal feminism is one that doesn’t argue for any changes to the capitalist structure of society. People who use this version tend to argue for more equality within the existing capitalist structure. They put a strong focus on individualism, and organisations that enable all individuals to participate equally. However, there is an underlying (and I would say incorrect) assumption that capitalism (especially free-market capitalism) can provide an open, fair and equal system, where everyone has equal access to achievement…. the old meritocracy idea.

    I was involved in the Women’s Movement in the UK in the late 70s and early 80s. The main view of UK feminists was that US feminism was dominated by liberal feminists, and that they weren’t true feminists. I guess this is because, by then, the organised left in the US had been strongly oppressed, or repressed or dismantled by the anti-socialist, anti-communist scare machine.

    Meanwhile, the UK Women’s Movement was strongly interwoven with organised left wing networks and groups.

    The neoliberal shift largely involved the spread of ideologies most favoured in the US. Consequently radical and socialist feminism came under attack (explicitly in the UK from the Thatcher government & the increasingly compliant MSM). Thus we got the rise of a narrowed version of feminism, more of a liberal feminist approach. We can see this most clearly in the rise of so-called girl-power, foregrounded by Madonna’s representation of a commodified, consumerist, individualistic version of female power & success: one that required women conform for a new kind of bodily attractiveness in order to get any access to success…. but there are so many contradictions in that regime, that it is a limited and regressively gendered notion of success, that fits easily within the neoliberal capitalist system.

    • Rosy 5.1

      That makes sense Carol. Although I call myself a feminist I’ve not been overtly involved in feminist discourse mainly because I seem to have experienced the commodified, individualistic thought you write of. I’m not much interested in this being able to take on all the behaviours of men, but am very interested in the left wing ideals of political equality, educational opportunity, and women’s rights to work in jobs they’re capable of, earn the same money as men, for the same job and being treated as equal partners in society – albeit with respect for reproductive differences. But also for men and women within whatever social, cultural or partnered situation they have, to have the right to be themselves, to take on responsibilities that go with those rights, and to be respected for that.

    • QoT 5.2

      I’m just not a fan of “real X must Y” arguments. Yes, there are definite problems with second-wave liberal feminism in that it focused a lot on the problems of economically privileged white heterosexual women. And that deserves to be called out. But it’s still looking at the oppression of women (albeit a small more-privileged group of women) and it’s still feminism.

      I also don’t agree with the connection of liberal feminism and consumerist/Spice Girls-esque “girl power” culture. I think that’s part of the capitalist backlash against feminism, which co-opted rebellious, revolutionary slogans and turned them into faux-empowering justifications for continued sexual subservience to men and distraction by “superficial” consumer goods from political engagement.

  6. the sprout 6

    another great post

  7. Props to both the Standard, for having the ovaries to seek out this discussion, and the QoT of course, for skewering all the reasons why liberation should be what progressives are aiming at for everyone.

    I’d love to see some lefty men here reflecting on things they have learnt from feminists, queer activists, tino rangatiratanga activists, anti-racists, disabled rights coalitions etc etc etc. Thoughts gentlemen?

  8. yet another excellent analysis QoT.

    one of the problems with different identity-based groups within a party is that often the groups aren’t listening to each other, and there is a lack of cohesion or the kind of leadership that will pull the different threads together. without that, the different groups end up competing – or rather, policy options are set up in such a way that the groups end up on either side of the issue rather than working together. i’d like to give specific examples, but that’s probably not a good idea just now.

  9. Afewknowthetruth 9

    “connecting with things that matter to people”.

    Brent oil is now close to $100, having risen by one third in just 6 months. Couple that with the worldwide food crisis and we can anticipate another round of price rises and another turn of the screw that will eventually render all discussion about Left/Right, chauvinism/feminism irrelevant.

    The great aberration that was western-style economics and western-style politics is in its death throes right now. and will be replaced by something quite different sooner than most people can imagine: it may be a return to fuedalism, a return to an empire based on slavery, a return to tribalism, or simply a die-off.

    Whatever is coming, it will not involve anything currently in vogue.

    • Carol 9.1

      So, if the world is transitioning to “tribalism” or “feudalism”, or “slavery”, we shouldn’t be aiming to ensure that we don’t return to a situation where women become the chattles of men, or that black people become the slaves of white, etc?

      Shouldn’t we be working towards some transition that is more fair and equitable?

      You just seem to repeating a slightly different version of the class/socio-economic based struggle is the focus, and issues for “identity-based” groups are not important.

      • Afewknowthetruth 9.1.1

        Many of us worked extremely hard for many years to generate public discussion about the transition you wrote of, and were ignored, laughed at and sabotaged. (I did it for a decade before giving up, giving up not so much because of of resistance by the empire but becasue of apathy and denial amongst the general public).

        We did all that at a time when some kind of smooth transition may have been possible. Now it is too late. Economic collapse is underway. However, 90+% of the populace still seem completely oblivious to the writing on the wall, or locked into denial, thnking there will be a ‘recovery’ (as they are constantly told will be the case by corporate medai and politicians). .

        The slavery I mentioned was not necessarily black people enslaving white people; it could well be white people enslaving white people, as is the case now, though most people are so uninformed they don’t recognise it, i.e. debt slavery and consumption slavery.

        As far as the present socio-economic system is concerned most people do not have any identity: they are simply cogs in the system, units of production and consumption. To have an identity one has to be a menber of the club of elites, i.e. a celebrity. Then the medai will focus on every aspect of your identity. more of less incessantly. (That keeps the proles nicely distracted from thinking about the real issues and generates yet more profit for the coporations who own the economy).

        Ultimately, the reason we have all the problems we do, the reason we are in the predicament we are, is because the proper relationships between men and women, and between people and the land base were destroyed centuries ago [in western society] by the empire.

        Any discussion that fails to address the big picture issues is futlie.

        • Carol 9.1.1.1

          Who said we are ignoring the bigger picture?

          Meanwhile, while you’re focusing only on the bigger picture of the coming Armageddon as it affects you ….. some time in the future, people are struggling, women are being discriminated against in the workplace, and being abused and bashed, LGBT people are being bashed, firebombed and discriminated against, Maori and Pacific people are losing out on education, dying young etc. This may not bother you, because it doesn’t affect you, but it sure as hell matters to the people involved.

          While you focus on the coming crash, which may or may not be as bad as you predict, you seem to be trying to squash people’s attempts to make the situation better. Also, whatever our social set-up is like before any major crash, it will influence the way things play out. Keep your eyes focused only on some generalised bigger picture if you want, but I’m not buying your squashing of people’s inter-related struggles for much needed change on identity-based issues.

          You are just putting forward another version of a white male-dominated left wing struggle. When you ignore identity-based issues, things just return to the white, het, cis, male-dominated default position.

          • Afewknowthetruth 9.1.1.1.1

            It concernes me greatly that ‘people are struggling, women are being discriminated against in the workplace, and being abused and bashed, LGBT people are being bashed, firebombed and discriminated against, Maori and Pacific people are losing out on education, dying young etc’

            All the things you mention are symptoms of an evil and dysfunctional empire. I have personally experienced most of them and much worse.

            Your phrase ‘some time in the future’ [for the crash] does cover the period 2011 to 2015, which is when the crash will occur, Guaranteed.

            ‘you seem to be trying to squash people’s attempts to make the situation better.’

            It is not possible to make the situation better at this late stage. The time for that was decades ago. We can now only soften the blow, try to minimise the suffering that is to come (as opposed to what politicians do, which is implement policies which will maximise the suffering) .

            And minimising suffering is only possible if people are prepared to accept the reality of the predicament they are in.

            Do not forget that as members of the western ‘looters club’ we ‘kill’ 30,000 children a day in order to maintain our rich lifestyle. It’s just that they are out of sight and so are out of mind.

            • Ari 9.1.1.1.1.1

              Have you considered that actually ensuring everyone is healthy, well, liberated, educated, and not discriminated against might actually improve our odds of preventing or dealing with said crash?

              Because it would, even assuming it comes as soon as in the next half-decade.

    • QoT 9.2

      I thoroughly agree with Ari’s comment at 9.1.1.1.1.1, but also wanted to make this greater point.

      I agree that we’re on course for a huge social/economic/global shakeup when peak oil combines with runaway climate change. It may be / probably is too late to avoid those things completely.

      But I believe that a society which values all people equally and tries to lift up the disadvantaged and downtrodden is a society which must take a more proactive stance on the environment we live in. A society which values the right of women to control their own fertility is a society with far fewer overpopulation problems. A society which cares about people living in poverty is a society which stops heavy industry fucking up the air in poor suburbs. A society focused on people caring about each other is a society far more likely, in my view, to think about the effects of our actions now on future generations we’ll never meet.

      We may be on a collision course with catastrophic global change. But that’s no fucking excuse to sit back and say “oh well, the pay gap won’t matter when we’re all drowning so women and youth and people of colour can just suck it up till the polar caps give out.”

  10. TELL IT!

    Best thing I have read in a long while.

  11. This is awesome. Well said. It needs to be screamed from the roof-tops.

  12. Rebecca 12

    Awesome article. I came across it after Boganette tweeted about it. Thanks so much for writing it.

  13. Gina 13

    Great article.
    Putting labels like socialist feminist or liberal feminist on the struggle for equality thought authentic and relevant might be confusing for many women who have not looked deepley into feminist literature but believe in equality.
    If capitalism were true capitalism then women would be paid rather than unpaid. I have always regarded mothers in their unpaid work as the biggest social welfare provider in the world. While
    men condemn women welfare recipients as bludgers they demand a massive amount of social support from women in the form of unpaid labour.
    I think we need to quantify that unpaid work and call a spade a spade. If the males of society wish to withdraw the meager allowances women get when they absolutely need it to continue their unpaid work in supporting society then women must withdraw that unpaid work. We must quantify it and use it at the barganing table. I think at this moment have a unique opportunity to get more women active in government.

    What has just happened in parliament i.e. the removal of the gift duty and how it was done without womens input or knowledge horrifies most women ( right and left ) who have been properly informed on the subject. That the Green party almost voted in favour of this abomination because the women of that party had no idea as to the effect on women has also shocked everyone made aware of it. So the men of the green party knew about the effects of the removal of the gift duty but didn’t think it was important and didn’t inform the women of the green party.
    Catherine Delahunties office knew nothing about it and the party were set to vote in favour of it until Catherine found out about it.

    Women should also be aware that labour even though they voted against it have not pledged to remedy the situation and indeed when I spoke with Sue Moroney’s assistant she tried very hard to tell me that as labours womens affairs spokewomen this was not in Sue Moroneys portfolio.
    The problem is of course the next election. If certain male voters and donors got wind that labour might enact legislation to protect women from trusts designed to rob them of their share of matrimonial property and thereby enforce the matrimonial property act then corporate funding might dry up leaving labour in a very bad position for the next election. The problem being women are too scared to talk about this sort of thing so the word would only get out to men who would then attempt to destroy labour.

    Here’s a fact of life NZ women need to digest. That unless they become activly involved in politics and keep a watch on parliament, that political parties will sell them out to people who are active in politics and donate to their parties re election fund. Most of those big donors are wealthy men who push their own agenda’s. Women who are married must risk upsetting their domestic applecart and discuss gender politics with their freinds. We as women must also donate if we can while demanding improvements in exchange for our support.
    The problems with this though right now is that threats from males regarding your employment or even your life often ensue. Ive had my own life threatend by kiwi blokes for daring to speak. If enough of us stand together we have a chance. The new search and surveillance society will be used to harrass women activists so we really need to nip it in the bud.
    I believe the national party might even be threatening our right to vote in the very near future. If this gets past Kiwis the nats will reign and women will be living in the 21st century but in a worse position than the women who lived 100 years ago.

    • QoT 13.1

      I think you’ve made some awesome points there Gina but just wanted to address this:

      If capitalism were true capitalism then women would be paid rather than unpaid.

      This is true if we’re looking at a platonic, conceived-in-a-vacuum kind of capitalism; but I’m of the view that capitalism as it has come about for humans on Earth has only done so because the labour of women is largely unpaid. Just as capitalism can by definition never provide full employment, it cannot acknowledge women’s work, which is why its bastard cousin patriarchy has put so much effort into convincing us that women’s work isn’t “real” or is something we must happily continue providing free of charge because we “naturally” do it.

  14. Bill 14

    I said this in some other thread, but I think it’s worth repeating.

    If ‘identity’ politics are divorced from the economic argument, ie they don’t take into account the full intersectionality of oppressions, then resentment will fester from within the ranks of those who are ‘merely’ economically oppressed. Of course, that cuts two ways. Any economic ‘rebalancing’ needs to take into account the intersectionality of any race, gender, disability, etc oppressions too.

    Way I see it at the moment, too much in the way of identity politics has been divorced from matters of economic oppression and so, from a working class perspective, offers nought beyond ‘everyone’ assuming a position on a par with the downwardly drifting position of the white, working class male.

    There is a hell of a difference between empowering given identifiable groups where members of the group happen to be middle class as opposed to where they happen to be working class. In the first instance, a more levelled playing field can allow them to better utilise their already privileged economic position, whereas in the latter situation, the same policy can simply lead to increased and unjustified levels of resentment.

    I think it’s a given that improvements built on top of a middle class starting point are generally touted as proof of the success of a given policy. But because the promotion of the succesful policy is silent on matters of class, the impression created is that all people belonging to the identified group are enjoying the touted levels of success or opportunity or whatever. And that’s not only simply not true, but adds to the burden of discrimination experienced by those in the identified grouping who are working class, deepening the already existing divisions within the working class along the way.

    • just saying 14.1

      You make an important point Bill and I think others such as Olwyn have tried to articulate it too.

      I find the differences in the experiences of “identified” groups across classes interesting and edifying. Those with money and clout are somewhat shielded from the ongoing oppression of others in their groups and may have a false confidence about how much has been achieved for their group across the board. Sometimes they can become part of the problem for their group in doing so. Seems to me that if these people found themselves living in the powerlessness of poverty, they would again feel the full weight of discrimination and oppression, and maybe realise that class and socioeconomic oppression can’t be swept under the carpet, and “identity” oppression will never be completely overcome unless oppression in all it’s forms becomes tranparent and vanquished. Otherwise it’s like the firebrigade endlessly damping down new hotspots. The fire might look like it’s out, but it could rage out of control again the minute their backs are turned.

      And quite apart from all that I find the smug middle-class ‘I’m alright Jack’ sickening and unconscionable. How anyone can enjoy their hard-won freedoms while trampling all over others (whether they get their own hands dirty in doing so or not (I do love mixing metaphors)) and sleep at night, is beyond me. And of course, as you say the resentments and divisiveness that so often result…

      • Bill 14.1.1

        Those with money and clout are somewhat shielded from the ongoing oppression of others in their groups…

        Same sex marriage might be a good example of that. (Just to clarify, I don’t believe in having the illegitimate authorities of the church or state sanction any personal relationships.) But to my point. Much of the debate around same sex marriage revolved around property rights (from memory). But what I never heard mention of was the fact that poor people in same sex relationships were going to be opened up to harassment by the likes of WINZ if they lived in the same house.

        I can’t escape the feeling that other solutions could have been found to deal with medical and property issues that i) didn’t potentially leave economically disadvantaged same sex couples further disadvantaged and ii) could have encompassed a far broader spectrum of people who also encounter some of the same brick walls when dealing with the medical profession.

        That. And well, I never have gotten my head around this idea of people wanting to opt into constrictive modes of normality.

        • Carol 14.1.1.1

          I’ve never understood the desire to be married, other than for some legal benefits: eg imigration rights etc. If a person feels they won’t be accepted (eg working class couples that you mention), then I doubt that they’d opt for a civil union.

          However, I do think having equal rights to marriage, sends a message to the general heterosexual population of a certain degree of acceptability, which may improve attitudes in the long term.

          I think the right to equal legal options, marriage etc, should be available for the people who want them.

          • Bill 14.1.1.1.1

            Yeah, but my point was that in achieving that right, some people were then exposed to the potential of harassment from WINZ (co-habitation) that could see them losing out financially.

            • Carol 14.1.1.1.1.1

              Well, maybe that’s one of the downsides of being treated equal to heterosexual couples. That’s always been a problem with opposite sex couples living together.

              • Bill

                The main protaganists were worried about property rights, inheretance rights and such like. In other words, they clove to a very middle class perspective. And by not taking into account the full effects of every day economic oppression they inadvertantly visited increased levels of oppression on the already more oppressed members of their own self identifying group.

                Which, considering that a lessening of oppression/discrimination was their driving concern….

                • Carol

                  But are these people in a different situation from heterosexual people who deal with WINZ? Isn’t the problem to do with people being on inadequate income or benefit levels? Or are you saying GLBT people should not try to achieve equality because it might expose some other inequalities?

                  And I’m not entirely sure it was only middleclass lesbians and gays that were asking for same sex marriage. For many same sex marriage is about having their relationships celebrated and accepted in the wider society.

                  • Bill

                    It broadened the scope of WINZ to harass people they couldn’t previously harass. And yes, the problem is related to poverty.

                    What I’m saying is that the point where poverty intersected with the GLBT community’s concerns seems to be a point that was never considered.

                    As I commented previously, I find it difficult to believe that the GLBT community couldn’t have developed or crafted demands that would have satisfied all GLBT folks as well as perhaps folk beyond the GLBT community.

                    Surely there are other ways than marriage to satisfy concerns about property rights and medical intransigence?

                    But yeah. If a sub group of the GLBT community merely sought to ‘opt-in’ to conservative and generally oppresive social norms, then hey.

                    • Carol

                      I’m not so sure that a lot of the demands from GLBT people for marriage are strongly based on property issues. I think part of the motivation for the government responding positively to those demands are, however, related to property rights and for financial reasons.

                      Many of us are not into same sex marriage, including many middleclass gays and lesbians, but not so much because of the property issues. People I know and know of who’ve got unioned seem to put the stress on emotional reasons, of the public statement and general acceptance that “marriage” gives them. And I know quite a few working class lesbians, or middleclass ones from working class backgrounds, who are strongly into supporting same-sex marriage. And many of us support the right to marriage, because of the positive message it gives, even if we are not into getting hitched ourselves.

                      I AM unhappy with the de facto rules that make any couple automatically defacto after living together for a couple of years. I think the government has done this to lower the amount and costs of court cases required to make property settlements when many couples break up. I think the de facto thing should be opt in not opt out.

                      It’s hard to get a clear fix on socio-economic level and desires for same-sex marriage. Statistics NZ doesn’t seem to have such correlations. It does have some of same sex partnership stats from the last census, but doesn’t identify the ones that are unioned or not in relation to socio-economic status.

                      http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/people_and_communities/marriages-civil-unions-and-divorces/same-sex-couples-in-nz.aspx

                      The socio-economic situation is complicated because those that state they are in a same sex relationship/couple tend to be better educated and earn more than heterosexual couples. This is, at least partly attributed to lesbians needing to be self-supporting, and to the fact that same sex couples tend to have less children.

                      It’s possible also that same sex couples on lower incomes, are less likely to be open about their relationships.

                      Also, there tends to be a smaller proportion of same sex couples getting unioned than heterosexual couples getting married or unioned. So, in spite of including a significant proportion of “middleclass” same-sex couples, these relatively well-off couples are less interested in being unioned.

    • Ari 14.2

      Absolutely, EVERY sort of intersectionality is important, and the way economic oppression interacts with social oppression is really, really sinister, and deserves to be talked about way more.

  15. KJT 15

    …you just look those bastards in the eye and say “Our society should be free and fair for everyone. No one should be attacked or discriminated against just because of who they are….

    Well as a white partially privileged male I totally agree with this statement. I’ve been a feminist supporter since as a 17 year old school holiday worker I thought it was manifestly unfair that I was getting $5 a week more than the 23 year old “office girl” because I was male.

    I am very proud of the fact that with our involvement with empowering women to broaden their horizons we have increased the number of women in traditional male occupations many times over. We were so successful on Spirit of Adventure we struggle to get enough boys to match the girls who want to go. Enabling women to have many more choices than 40 years ago. Lack of pay equity is something employers try to hide in the shadows now instead of being accepted as it was in the 70’s.
    A lot of of us white hetero, short, balding working class males have supported minority rights for a long time.

    Unfortunately when we raise our heads above the parapet there are some rabid man hating feminazi types, as well as other identity politics types, who rather than acknowledge our efforts accuse us of being guilty just because of “who” we are.

    That is why we are reluctant to speak on identity politics. I prefer to stick to trying to change the system that disadvantages 97% of us no matter who we are rather than being told I am doing the wrong thing no matter how hard I try..

    • Gina 15.1

      Hello KJT

      I don’t know who you are or why feminists have attacked you. If you have helped women and Kiwis in general then I’m very grateful to you. But that term feminazi is repeatedly used by males who are so anti women we would be better off dead than under their rule. Using that term is very creepy indeed unless you justify it with examples of what feminazis are and what they’ve done to upset you so much.

      • KJT 15.1.1

        “just as unfair as the one that thinks all feminist women are man haters”.

        Actually the best example recently was the Christchurch Crech case. Which was to do with a gay male not getting a fair trial.

        Redneck women haters, masculonazis if you like, do use the term feminazis to refer to people who I would consider nothing of the sort.
        Sandra Coney, Helen Clark, Sian Elias and other people who I have enormous respect for.

        The ones, I don’t know if you would call them real feminists. that upset me are the ones who assume you have no right to speak even as a supporter, or the ones who go right away into personal attacks if you disagree with them in the slightest and those who see all white males as the enemy. Condemn you for your colour and/or sex before they even know you. See below.

        Anyway my wife has seen this now and is laughing. We are leaving now for a mutual foot rub.

    • just saying 15.2

      You sure part of the problem isn’t that you’re expecting accolades for examples of treating women with equal respect, ie for unexceptional nonsexist behaviour? I don’t know I’m just wondering here.

      I’d be interested to know precisely what you are talking about when you say
      “being told I am doing the wrong thing no matter how hard I try..”

      But nevertheless good on you for having the courage to put your head above that parpet here and now.

      • KJT 15.2.1

        No I don’t expect accolades for doing the right thing. I expect that from every one as a matter of course. .
        Just that people stop generalising about white middle working class males. There are unthinking prejudices from all types. The one that lumps all white working class males as women hating rednecks is just as unfair as the one that thinks all feminist women are man haters.
        It tends to alienate people who are otherwise keen supporters of minority rights.

        I don’t doubt I say the wrong thing sometimes, don’t we all, but the intentions are good. I was born before 1960 after all.

        There are a small bunch of so called feminists of the “all men are rapists” persuasion which I and others have crossed swords with. Same as I have argued with misogynistic men.

        And I think a Married man who publicly lusts after other women with a wife basher is really creepy. I am a bit old fashioned like that.

        • Boganette 15.2.1.1

          Again, where are these man-hating-all-men-are-rapists feminists? I’ve never met one.

          • pollywog 15.2.1.1.1

            Don’t get out much huh or mingle with a broad cross section of society ?

            …too busy with your head stuck up your arse maybe ?

            • Boganette 15.2.1.1.1.1

              Could you give an example of one then? Just one name, one blog etc?

              No?

              • pollywog

                google ‘man hating blog’…

                then take a deep breath, step away from the computer and go enjoy some family time yeah ?

                …cos i got washing to hang out and dinner to make before the Missus gets home or there’ll be hell to pay 🙂

                • Boganette

                  So, just to clarify – you both believe there is a large contigent of man-hating-all-men-are-rapists type of feminists but you can’t actually provide proof of even one woman that you’ve engaged with who fits the bill?

                  Yeah, that’s what I thought.

                  Also, I don’t need to step away from the computer, or take a deep breath, or ‘enjoy some family time’. I’m perfectly calm – you don’t need to worry about my welfare.

                  • Bill

                    I’ve met the grand total of….one. Back in the 80’s. And she was young and gave me the distinct impression that she had ‘learned’ her feminism piecemeal from snippets here and there rather than developed it from experience. She was, for whatever reason, incredibly bitter and spiteful.

                    The other wimin (if I can indulge in 80 isms) in the room (several of them) were all feminists and not a single one of them backed her in her you are a man, men are rapists therefore you are a rapist onslaught and her variations thereof.

                    It was an ‘interesting’ evening.

                  • KJT

                    No I do not believe there is a large contingent. Just a loud one. And I am sure you have heard of or met them. Just as I know the contingent of working class rednecks is also very small, but makes a lot of noise. ACT and the capital C Christian right has only a few percent of the vote after all.

                    • Boganette

                      Surely if they’re that loud you could name one? Or direct us to a blog that is run by one?

                      The man-hater-all-men-are-rapists-feminist is a mythical creature. A fairytale. It’s a way to discredit the movement and the women involved in it. It’s a way to attack feminists as a whole. And frankly I’m quite tired of it. If men are going to keep claiming that women have actually said to them “I’m a feminist, I hate men and all men are rapists” then surely they should be able to back up that claim? Just you know – ONE link to ONE blog where that was said?

                      The only people who imagine up these characters are certain types of men….

                    • KJT

                      “The only people who imagine up these characters are certain types of men”….

                      Yeah right! I’ve met a few.
                      Blogs are not the whole of humanity.

                      And what type of Man does that make me exactly?

                      And they do give rednecks far too much ammunition.

                  • pollywog

                    just to clarify…

                    …what i’m saying is there are man hating LESBIANS around. just what exactly do you think heterophobe means ?

                    and for the record, i’ve met some, know some but if you expect me to post their names and addresses so you can verify their feminist credentials then you’re shit out of luck

                    maybe you should read what i wrote not what you think i wrote and stop confusing lesbians with feminists or are they mutually inclusive ?

                    • Boganette

                      Dude, I wasn’t even talking to you about that! You’re carrying shit over from the other thread. If lesbian women don’t like you that means they don’t like YOU not that they don’t like men. As I said on the other thread if you’re going to be lecherous pervert around them then chances are they’re not going to like you. That’s not strange! If a creepy, gross pig stands in the corner drooling over a woman at a gay club chances are the women there are going to be hostile towards him. You can’t translate the way that women react to you as being the same as how they react to decent men.

                      I think you two are getting confused – the women who hate you probably just hate YOU – not men in general. Unless they specifically said they hate men then I think you got the wrong end of the stick and they’re just reacting to the intense disgust they have for you.

                    • pollywog

                      WOAH Babe…i think i’ve just found your man hating feminist…

                      …go look in a mirror

                    • Boganette

                      What? I’m a man-hater because I think you’re a creep? How does that work?

                    • A Nonny Moose

                      Oh you’re just all class Polly. You can’t debate QoT’s post, so you attack the commenters.

                      “Look in the mirror”. Lower than a snakes belly dude. While we’re miles beyond Feminism/Ad hominem 101, you’re way back at the start chucking out attacks we’ve heard a million times before.

                      You want to debate feminists, get a little clued up.

                    • pollywog

                      nah…it’s more your strong language directed at someone you don’t even know just because he’s male, and the irrational jumping to conclusions when they don’t fit your pre conceptions or buy into your rhetoric…

                      heh…i’m not a lecherous perverted creepy gross pig who drools at gay women only for them to react with intense disgust ?

                      in that instance i was just a guy looking for a dance with a hot chicca at a gay club whose partner saw me as sexual competition and looked to get all offensive about it. I woulda backed off in the same situation if some jealous rugby munter thought i was out for his lady as well.

                      i think you better chickety-check yourself before you wreck yourself.

                    • Boganette

                      For the last time – because this is a massive derail on what is a really important thread.

                      I am basing my comments about you on what you said on the other thread (and now this thread). I think you’re gross not because you are male – but because you are gross. Again, this proves my earlier point about ‘man-hating’.

                      End of story.

                    • pollywog

                      oh fuck off with ya bad self ya nonny moose…

                      i’m not debating QoT’s post cos i’m in agreement with it and i’m hardly attacking the commenters.

                      why do you feel like i’m attacking you and feel the need to defend yourself from a group perspective.

                      exactly what attack specifically can you quote me on that you’ve heard a ‘million times before’ ?

                      prone to exaggeration much ?…cos it doesn’t seem like i’m debating a feminist with you, more like schooling an errant and petulant child

                    • pollywog

                      It sure does prove my point about your man hating Boganette.

                      It’s my maleness that grosses you out…

                    • T

                      I don’t know why Boganette doesn’t hold you in high regard, but the fact that you were ‘looking for a dance with a hot chicca at a gay club‘ makes you seem to me like a bit of jackass. I don’t hate you. I certainly don’t hate men — that would be a bit tricky considering I am one.

                      It’s a matter of respect. To me, from what you relate, you haven’t recognised the importance of giving people some privileged space and time of their own, amongst people of their own choosing – not because they necessarily have a legal right to it, but because it’s considerate. You’ve been somewhat intrusive and you don’t seem to recognise it as such, and for that, I think you’re a bit of a bell-end.

                      But that’s just one man’s opinion – maybe others think you’re a top bloke. Whatever. Not everyone has to like you, and those that don’t, probably have nothing against other people who are superficially similar to you (gender, colour, etc).

                • A Nonny Moose

                  You do realize that “step away from the computer” is a silencing tactic, pw? Because if women do, you’ll still be here in your echo chamber, thinking you’ve won.

                  No, we will not shut up just because you feel uncomfortable called on your privilege.

                  But seriously, are there not ANY new comebacks? I’m sure some person will think they’re so clever soon and pop out the “sammich” line. I mean, yawwwwn. We’re way passed fighting the baseline, can’t you step up the intellectual rigour a little?

                  Captcha: doubts (I has them)

                  • pollywog

                    hah…and what privilege would that be ?

                    fine you got your girls back and all ANM, but i’m not implying you all step away and take a deep breath before hitting the post button, just Boganette cos she sounds a little wound up…

                    …so by all means shout your beliefs from the battlements for all to hear, it’s just some of us have got better things to do than stand around and listen for very long

                    i got 99 problems but a dick ain’t one…how’s that for a comeback line ?

                    • Boganette

                      Why do I sound wound up? Because I’m disagreeing with you?

                      We’re hardly shouting Polly. We’re attempting to have a discussion. If you have better things to do then by all means opt out of this thread.

                      Oh and: http://tinyurl.com/6b9uaex

                    • pollywog

                      I think you’re wound up cos i don’t fit into your little box of mysogyny…

                      oh and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY7Mx5QHrC0

                      http://lyricsplayground.com/alpha/songs/i/ifitdontfitdontforceit.shtml

                      so mysogynist is the opposite of feminist…no middle ground huh ?

                    • A Nonny Moose

                      You can\’t be sexist because…what, you\’re married? You love your wife? She agrees with you? Ah yes, the Nice Guy (TM) defence, the same defence used for Assange (he can\’t be a rapist! he\’s done great things for democracy!), and Polanski (He can\’t be a rapist! He\’s an ARTIST!), and Key (he can\’t be a sexist, he loves his country AND his wife!).

                      It\’s ingrained stuff. You can be a nice guy (litle n, little g) and still say things that have been socialized into you. THAT\’S privilege. You can say in a social group \”haha, chill out little feminazi lady\”, and everyone will chuckle/agree. I can say \”chill out dude, you\’re being a sexist\”, and will be shunned from the social group (guess what, it happened).

                      Male privilege gets you a pass into pretty much anything, and you don\’t know its privilege because you don\’t see it happening. It just does. It opens the doors of the world for you.

                    • pollywog

                      ooh shit nonny…you read it on the interwebz so it must be true

                      so how does that derailing for dummies work ? am i the dummy, the marginalized person or the privileged one ?

                      i s’pose this is the part where we see who can piss further up the marginalized, privileged, dummy wall ?

                      i’ll see your oppressed womanhood and raise you a dumb nigga, something like that ?

                      gotta love roles and responsibilites when everyone plays to type eh ?..just so easy to pigeon hole people if we all just follow the script…

                      as you were

                  • pollywog

                    No, we will not shut up just because you feel uncomfortable called on your privilege

                    once again…

                    hah…and what privilege would that be ?

                    Who is the we you speak of ? are you getting some consensus on the correct answer ?

                    please don’t shut up on me. trust that i’m perfectly comfortable with whatever your answer will be…

    • Are you for real? “Rabid man hating feminazi types’? Do you know any woman under the age of about 35 who would think of herself as a feminist? My experience over the last decade or more is that the backlash against identity politics and pretty much any other form of progressive thought or action (anything that the silencing label of PC could be applied to) has been so strong that younger women who express ideas with the slightest hint of feminist analysis often start with a disclaimer like, ‘I’m not a feminist, but…’

      What a great blog! A very refreshing antidote to the depoliticizing diet of pseudo-feminist post-modern ‘scholarship’.

      • KJT 15.3.1

        I think it is a real shame that there has been a backlash against feminism. . Trying to broaden the horizons of girls at High School to look beyound traditional women’s roles is coming up against present day social expectations. Mostly from the girls themselves. We need a revival of the girls can do anything campaign.

    • Boganette 15.4

      “Unfortunately when we raise our heads above the parapet there are some rabid man hating feminazi types, as well as other identity politics types, who rather than acknowledge our efforts accuse us of being guilty just because of “who” we are.”

      Who are these rabid man hating femanazi types you speak of?

      It just sounds like your pissed off that feminists aren\’t lining up with cupcakes and footrubs for you just because you’re ‘on our side’.

      If you want a cookie maybe you should not call us feminazis? Maybe you should do shit in support of women without expecting something in return. That might be a good start.

    • Ari 15.5

      Eh, I’ve found in my “journies through feminism” that mostly when I’ve been called out it’s because I’ve been unclear or just because I’ve really needed to be checked on something.

      There ARE a few women who have some real issues under the feminist banner, but they’re a vanishingly small minority and don’t justify the kinda words you’re using. Mostly they’re people who have been really badly mistreated and have basically lost trust in men as a category, and that’s not something to be mocked, it’s something to feel sad about, in my opinion. None of them in any way reflect on the movement as a whole, either.

      If you start off too loudly when you’re getting into feminism you can certainly get into a bit of trouble because there’s a lot of basics to go through for most guys before you really “get it”, so if you tend to speak out a lot as you’re learning you’re going to be told you’re wrong quite a lot.

      You weren’t exactly clear as to the specifics of why you were being criticized, so it’s hard to answer really.

      • KJT 15.5.1

        Basically for being male. Which is just as bad as dissing someone for being… Put in your own minority here.

        • Boganette 15.5.1.1

          Honestly, come on now. Who here is criticising you for being male?

          • Brett 15.5.1.1.1

            JUSTIFY YOUR PRIVILEGE!!!”
            LOL, she’s got you in her sights.

          • KJT 15.5.1.1.2

            Why have you started with the ad-hominims then.

            Seen above. if I disagree with you I must be a certain type of male.

            You are trying to alienate me already.

            • Boganette 15.5.1.1.2.1

              No, I said: “The only people who imagine up these characters are certain types of men….” in reesponse to the ‘man-hating-all-men-are-rapists-feminist’ claim you made. Which is true. In my experience only certain people make that claim. Am I meant to deny my learned experience in order not to alienate you when you couldn’t care less if you alienate me?

              • KJT

                You started the personal attack. Sort of proves my point.

                People making assumptions because of gender.

                • Boganette

                  Are you serious? You consider that a personal attack? So when you’re asking for recognition for your ‘good works’ while using terms like “rabid man hating feminazi” – if someone asks you to expand on this whole ‘crossing swords with femanazis’ bullshit then they’re personally attacking you? SERIOUSLY? You believe this? WOW.

                  • QoT

                    For the record Boganette has basically been stealing thoughts from my head and typing them out as comments.

                    @KJT and others: I’m sorry if you’ve met with hostility from some women. That’s just how some people react to thousands of fucking years of oppression and a lifetime of being told they are lesser human beings.

                    I likewise have been on the receiving end of hostility from people of colour and non-heterosexuals. I got over it because it wasn’t about me.

                    • pollywog

                      others: I’m sorry if you’ve met with hostility from some women. That’s just how some people react to thousands of fucking years of oppression and a lifetime of being told they are lesser human beings.

                      yeah i’m so used to being an ‘other’, but theres really no need to apologise. it wasn’t your fault…

                      WHITEMAN IS THE DEVIL 🙂

  16. Gina 16

    What do you all think would happen to a feminist or pro choicer or group of either who threatened a kiwi blokes life. Do you think the police would come to the aid of feminists who’s lives were being threatened standing up for matrimonial property rights. Think about it. I know I do.

    • nadis 16.1

      Gina – thats a ridiculous comment and detracts from the validity of whats written in this post. There are plenty of women in NZ who are very thankful that the police have come to their aid in a matrimonial property dispute that is turning violent, to declare otherwise is risible and insulting to Police, very few of whom exhibit the neanderthal attitude you accuse them of. Thirty years ago you may have had a point but not now. Case in point is the instant protection orders that are frequently used (and note these were passed unanimously by Parliament under a women hating, violence against feminist inciting National government).

      Now, you may be able to argue that the law unfairly discriminates in some circumstances (and here I am thinking of recognising unpaid contributions to matrimonial property ie wife staying home to look after kids, allowing husband to work long hours) but that’s not the same issue as you are claiming. In modern NZ society I think the Police do a very good job of upholding the law, in the circumstances where people bleat about Police failing to uphold peoples rights the issue is either (rarely) an individual bad cop, or the law is an outdated ass tat needs changing.

      Anti-spam word is mad – good description of your comment.

      As an aside, we should acknowledge how far NZ society has come – yes it’s not perfect but there has been a hell of a lot of positive progress. I would suggest that the vast majority of NZ’ers would agree that discrimination against all of the minorities mentioned in this post is inexcusable. Does it still exist? Yes. There is a mismatch between individuals intentions and actions, but the proportion of true dinosaurs is significantly lower now than it has ever been.

      To be fair – despite being one of the “guilty” (white, middle aged capitalist that votes right) – I would agree that discrimination is about economics rather than anything else, but not everyone “privileged” is guilty. If you try and sell that argument you’ll lose the battle, as the battle then becomes replacing our existing society with your version of utopia (95% of the population will recoil from you in horror) rather than building and improving on what we have.

      • Gina 16.1.1

        I can tell you nadis that my own experience with police has been horrible. Sorry but I don’t agree.
        What is it about the idea of proptecting matrimonial property rights for women that women will hate. The women i have informed about this have been almost without exeption in agreement with me, horrified that their governmnet has done behind their back and ready to kick them out. Is destroying the matrimonial property act behind womens backs progress. What world do you live in deary. I have been told that men want things back the way they were so I should shut up. How is that progress?

        And i can tell you that when I have been threatened by men the police have not been interested. I have been made to feel like a criminal. I could go on about the nasty way the police have acted towards me but that might identify me.

      • Gina 16.1.2

        The improvement I see is women voters finding out what Nact has done re the repeal of the Gift Duty and its effect on divorce.
        Once they truly know what Key has been up to they will kick him out and they can. Thats the first step. Those women who I have spoken to do not recoil in horror. They are profoundly grateful that someone has the balls and the decency to tell them and perhaps save them from dire poverty should their marriage collapse and they finhd themselves destitute.

        • Gina 16.1.2.1

          The unmarried women I have spoken to have told me that this underhanded gutting of the matrimonial property act has put them off marriage and they are now considering a completely different future. So much for recoiling in horror at my ideas aye.

          I think its very sad that they now do not feel safe enough in the protections for women to marry as we all want that. But we are constantly told we are responsible for our finances and must pay so how can you donate a lifetime to someone elses benefit leaving your own financial future potentially destitute. There are only so many pounds of flesh you can extract from women and this puts them way over the limit.

          • KJT 16.1.2.1.1

            I met several women in teacher training who were trying to struggle away from the DPB with no support from their wealthy ex partners who had hidden all their income in trusts.
            Private trusts are just a means of avoiding legal, matrimonial or taxation obligations. The puzzle is why they are still legal.

            Rather than focusing on gift duty I think we should be focused on removing the family trust as a separate legal hideaway.

            • Gina 16.1.2.1.1.1

              Yes I think you are correct there KJT. I do think thought that labour are looking at the gift duty repeal from the point of view that it might allow other forms of tax evasion by the rich. They need to quantify how much we could loose out of the taxation pool. How they will calculate that I really don’t know.

              There does need to be something done pretty quickly though as when the repeal is enacted before new protections are introduced there could be large numbers of women ( I’m talking in the 10’s of thousands ) who could suddenly loose all their matrimonial property as there would be no delay in transfering assetts etc into trusts. There could be an avalanche of men creating trusts from small businesses like plumbers etc which are not co-owned dumping all their assetts and profits in trusts. the women who go that extra mile supporting their partners so they can really grow these businesses could be suddenly and unknowingly impoverished.

              I cant imagine how it would feel to give your heart and soul working for your partner thinking you are financially protected then finding out a few years down the track that he deliberately cheated you and you are now pennyless.

          • nadis 16.1.2.1.2

            I understand the point you are trying to make but i think its bollocks – the removal of gift duty shouldn’t in itself create the issue you are claiming. Two points- assets transferred into a trust to avoid creditors or spousal claim are often reversed by court order even beyond the much quoted 2 year limit. And why would you enter into a marriage and agree its a good idea not to be a beneficiary of the trust that owns all of the matrimonial assets. That is stupid.

            And for your bad experiences with cops which I cant comment on, there are plenty of people out there with correspondingly good ones including my sister plus a couple we know through kids at school. No actual violence but plenty of threats. Cops were very hard but fair, I wouldn’t describe their immediate triage as emotionally nurturing for anyone, but as soon as they intervened nobody was going to get physically hurt. There concerns were clearly safety of children, safety of adults, sort out the details later. You think any police officer wants to put themselves in a situation where they need to explain why they did nothing at a domestic violence call out 3 hours before someone was battered to death?

            You should actually advise your friends to do the logical thing which is understand the financial implications of entering into a contract (ie marriage). Hold all assets in joint ownership either directly or as beneficiary of a trust. If your partner won’t agree save the future divorce stress and end it early. It’s not rocket science. BTW, my wife hasnt worked in a paid role for over 20 years. When we had the luxury of needing only 1 income we made a rational choice. I worked for pay (greater earning potential due to my educational choices), she worked as a housewife to provide our kids with the best possible supportive environment. Joint bank accounts, equal in our trust. If there is ever a divorce I expect a court would grant her the family home plus half the assets plus maintenance as I’ve been the only paid earner. I have no problem with that. Could I have structured our financial affairs to avoid that potential outcome – possibly, but then she’d never have married me. She’s not stupid.

            • KJT 16.1.2.1.2.1

              I know several women whose Husbands put the money into trusts. In all cases the wife did not know that there was a trust and how much of their business income was being siphoned of until too late. To add insult to injury all the exes concerned also cleaned out their joint accounts and one left the mortgage and other bills many months in arrears.

              I can understand there can be a fair bit of acrimony between partners in a breakup, but I cannot understand how someone can leave their kids with nothing.

  17. marsman 17

    WOW QoT ! Great post!!!

  18. Danielle 19

    That was fucking ACE, QoT.

    Also: the idea that the “proper relationships between men and women… were destroyed centuries ago” is a bunch of ahistorical pastoralist hooey.

  19. Lew 20

    Two posts on consecutive days, and it’s still a love-fest. Don’t get me wrong — it’s nice and all, but I think the purpose was to stimulate genuine and robust discourse rather than a round of congratulatory back-patting. There are still suspiciously few bites from the usual crowd of materialism-or-death hacks.

    Hey, all of you who’ve recently been busily putting the boot into all womankind regarding the Assange rape allegations, and into the mentally ill regarding Jared Lee Loughner, and into tangata whenua regarding the actions of a party of ‘class traitors’ who (as you’re quick to note) doesn’t represent them all — where you at? You know who you are. Stop looking around saying “Who, me?” Turn up and argue your corner like you’ve got a pair.

    Because QoT has. If I’m not very much mistaken, she’s come looking for a bit of a tussle. She deserves more than your patronising silence, and I’m pretty sure she can handle it. Can you?

    L

    • Brett 20.1

      Honestly why would you even bother discussing this.It’s like debating the existence of god with a group of Christians.
      I actually feel sorry for these woman, always the victim,always living in a state of terror imagine going through life that that.

      • Lew 20.1.1

        I just feel sorry for you, Brett. I imagine it must be tricky to function in NZ with such a rudimentary grasp of the English language.

        L

        • Brett 20.1.1.1

          My writing skills certainly aren’t quite as flash as yours Lew.
          Obviously a side effect of my “working class roots”, I will make more of an effort next time especially around people who come from a higher class level such as yourself
          “Doffs hat”

      • QoT 20.1.2

        always living in a state of terror imagine going through life that that.

        Yeah, it fucking sucks, actually.

        Thought experiment for ya, Brett: You’re at a shopping centre late at night. It’s dark, you’re alone, and your car is all the way across the parking lot. What do you do?

        (For bonus points, pretend you’re a woman and explain why this is a trick question.)

        • Draco T Bastard 20.1.2.1

          One night I was going to see some friends of mine. I took the bus. At my stop a young women got off as well and we headed in the same direction. After awhile she started walking faster and faster until she broke into a run and ran to the nearest house and banged on the door.

          You say sexism is bad and yet here you are spreading it.

          • Danielle 20.1.2.1.1

            You might find the first part of this article edifying, Draco:

            http://tinyurl.com/ya2fd8v

          • QoT 20.1.2.1.2

            Um, how, Draco?

            I’ve been that young woman. On many occasions. Because I know I am fucking lucky to not be one of the one in four who are sexually assaulted in their lifetimes.

            It isn’t sexist to acknowledge that women are subjected to sexual violence at a horrifying rate. It isn’t sexist to acknowledge that women in general have to take precautions and considerations men in general do not (of course, a young Maori guy or a very camp / openly gay guy in, say, the middle of Christchurch might empathise with the situation). It isn’t sexist to note that the vast majority of violence committed against women is committed by men. What about those statements is problematic?

            • KJT 20.1.2.1.2.1

              Most of the time that fear is not justified. Though I know it is very real.
              As we know most rapists and those who physically attack women are known to the victim. The danger is at home, disgustingly, from those who should be protecting and nurturing the women and girls in their family. Stranger danger is exaggerated.

              I think I can empathise having had to walk through port areas in some pretty rough places. Not very nice when you hear multiple footsteps getting faster and closer.

              It is young men who should be most fearful of physical attack on the street as they are much more likely to be physically attacked by strangers.
              My wife and women friends may have blokes trying to chat them up in the pub, but they do not get some drunken bruiser they don’t know walking up to them and threatening to punch them out because they happen to dislike your face, voice or whatever.
              Young women are told not to go out alone in the dark. Unjustly restricting their freedom. Whereas young men are not reminded of their danger and walk around pretty much where they like even though they are more likely to be injured. .

              A while ago there was a “reclaim the night” movement. Anyone know what happened to it?

              Apart from that I suggest pepper spray. Or as I taught my daughter. Knee in the nuts then run.

              • Lew

                KJT, indeed, most of the time the fear is not justified on the basis of cold probability. But that’s somewhat irrelevant. Fear is not rational: if you’re afraid, it doesn’t matter whether the numbers stack up. Fear itself is also a thing to be avoided and minimised, since feeling constantly afraid is itself traumatic. And with respect, you shouldn’t equate common street assault by one man on another with rape or other sexual violence. They’re not equivalent; the one comprises a small subset of the violations necessarily manifest in the other.

                Because there is a non-zero risk, it’s for each person to weight their response to that risk according to their own needs for safety and wellbeing. For someone to say “just lighten up, it’s not that dangerous” presents a moral hazard: in a general sense they might be right, but this will be cold comfort to the person who lightens up and gets attacked as a consequence of not taking their usual degree of care.

                There is huge merit, of course, in building safer communities and environments. And those projects are ongoing. However until they are considerably more successful there’s no substitute for prudence.

                L

                • M

                  Lew, Gavin de Becker author of ‘The Gift of Fear’ said in a TV interview that intuition was the voice of God. He said that if a person felt fearful that it was nature’s way of protecting the person from something that may harm them. He said that animals in many ways are smarter because if there’s even a hint of danger they scarper.

                  At the beginning of his book he related and example of how a woman may be raped by a man through him manipulating her by saying things like “Too independent to let a guy carry your groceries?” and because she’s been socialised to be polite and not give offense ends up letting him into her house after some further manipulation and then is raped. After the rape he closed her bedroom window and said “You know I won’t hurt you” and goes off to the kitchen. The woman suspected he was going to get a knife to kill her – she then sneaked out of her apartment and managed to quietly knock on a neighbour’s door on the same floor and was saved.

                  I bought this book and it had some very good points in it like: a decent man will gracefully accept a woman declining an offer of help or his romantic/sexual advances and that other women can help their own sex avoid violence by say helping a woman in a car park load children and groceries into the car.

                  But yeah, it still sucks having to arrange your life around safety and I’m an Amazon.

              • QoT

                My wife and women friends may have blokes trying to chat them up in the pub, but they do not get some drunken bruiser they don’t know walking up to them and threatening to punch them out because they happen to dislike your face, voice or whatever.

                The next time you do get randomly punched by a drunk guy out of nowhere, KJT, I’d like you to consider the following things:

                – you’re not going to get pregnant from being randomly punched
                – you’re not going to be considered the person morally culpable for getting yourself punched
                – when you show up at the police station the next day and the swelling’s gone down they’ll probably still believe that you did get punched and not ask if you’re just suffering “drinkers’ remorse”.

                Further, you won’t have been punched-at-random because society specifically marks you out as a thing-to-be-punched and you won’t get randomly punched because someone feels the need to express their dominance and power over your entire gender.

        • Brett 20.1.2.2

          Being male or female is irrelevant , it’s more about common sense, thinking ahead and not placing yourself in this situation.
          I have a fair bit of muscle and can use my fists if needed but if I got jumped by a group of people late at night, in a deserted area, I would most likely get my head kicked in.
          The best way to stop this from happening is to show a bit of situational awareness and make adjustments to suit.

          • QoT 20.1.2.2.1

            And tell me, Brett, when a “group of people” jump you are you going to immediately assume they want to rape you?

            You also still haven’t answered my question. “Situational awareness” is great and all but when it is dark and late and your car is far away and you appear to be entirely alone, what do you do and why is this a trick question?

            • Brett 20.1.2.2.1.1

              I am struggling to see why this is a trick question?

              • Lew

                Is that a declarative statement, Brett, or a question? It can’t be both.

                Also: Yes. Yes, you are struggling.

                L

                • Brett

                  I think the problem might be the fact that I didn’t go to university so all my answers don’t come from a text book.

                  • Lew

                    Perhaps, but based on your last, I think the problem might rather be that you didn’t go to intermediate or high school, since that’s where they teach the difference between a statement and a question.

                    L

                    • Rosy

                      Does educational privilege trump gender privilege?

                    • QoT

                      No, Rosy, because that’s not how privilege works and to consider it that way would be a weird kind of reverse-Oppression Olympics. No form of oppression or privilege “trumps” anything else because they’re not working on the same spectrum.

              • QoT

                Because women with a clear awareness of the fact they have a 1 in 4 chance of being sexually assaulted in their lives don’t leave their car all the way across the carpark when they’re working/shopping late.

                • Rosy

                  ‘because that’s not how privilege works’
                  See my problem is I didn’t do well at school due to non-school issues and left school at 15. If there are disadvantages at home, learning anything in the years before leaving school is hit and miss. Being pulled up on grammar can be crushing if you’re attempting to engage and have this kind of educational disadvantage and it is pretty much closing down a conversation – which is what the aim might be, and in some cases is a valid tactic – but it seems a bit of an own goal on a discussion thread that is partly aimed a discussing issues on the disconnect between the left and gender issues.

                  • McFlock

                    I think it was probably a valid tactic to use against someone who was being a manly man and blaming the silly victim (regardless of gender, so he’s not being a sexist idiot) for getting into that situation in the first place.

                    Security/self defense buzzwords like “situational awareness” are applicable to some discussions with tight limits on “specific threat/circumstance” (e.g. cash transit work).
                    Not so much when you’re in the realm of “oh, let’s deal with a general hypothetical image I have of what the ‘typical’ crime looks like”. There is a tendency to produce useless/damaging ideas like “women shouldn’t walk at night because it’s dangerous” (leads to “you were asking for it”) rather than a more useful “what can society do to make night safer for everybody?” or even the observational “how does it impact someone’s life if every action they take during the day or night, no matter how minor, needs to be second-guessed from the perspective of an extreme danger to personal safety?”.

                  • QoT

                    Having educational privilege is generally part-and-parcel of other forms of privilege, especially class (having to leave school to work, not being able to afford school supplies) and often gender (not being expected to attend university due to getting married / not “needing” a career, getting pregnant young).

                    I simply don’t believe Brett was “trying to engage” in a genuine way based on previous form and given that previous form I am unsurprised that Lew went for grammar-snark instead of trying to explain basic rape culture concepts to someone who doesn’t want to listen.

                    • just saying

                      I cringed with the comment Rosy picked up on. Leaving aside whether it was an appropriate response to Brett, it was insulting to many others, and had the potential to silence less confident readers, who haven’t been privileged by an extensive conventional education.

                      Saying that, I know there are people who feel strongly about grammar and spelling in and of itself, (and I suspect might be of the colour coordinating the washing and pegs on the clothesline ilk). And that’s different.

                    • Brett

                      Mate I couldn’t care less what a stuck up snob like Lew thought.
                      The irony is not lost on me, that people like Lew have set themselves up as the so called “voice of the working class’,yet get all shitty when someone who actually came from a working class background calls them out on their bullshit.
                      Like many of the people who post here, Lew reeks of class privilege.

                    • lprent

                      I can’t recall Lew ever claiming to be the voice of anything apart from himself. Trying to ascribe generalities based on individuals is a rather silly trait. You wind up spending all of your time trying to explain away the normal exceptions.

          • Lew 20.1.2.2.2

            Brett, paraphrasing the NRA: women would be unwise to allow your lack of imagination to hinder their safety.

            L

    • AllTheNoms 20.2

      Hey Lew, I think self-congratulatory back patting is likely the only response that wont end in many commenters being told that they just don’t understand and can’t look past privilege etc. I can’t believe you actually expected rational discussion.

      • Lew 20.2.1

        How absurd to expect rational discussion with hysterical feminazis, innit.

        Honestly.

        L

        • Danielle 20.2.1.1

          We feminists are so terribly *shrill*, you know.

          (Whining about how your ideas will be received before even posting them is a totally rational action, of course.)

      • Boganette 20.2.2

        Oh please, what a fucking cop-out.

        Fuck, why is owning privilege such a difficult concept? People aren’t even prepared to try. We deal with constant threats of violence and rape on our blogs and get called whores, sluts, bitches, femanazis, man-haters etc but good forbid someone tells a dudebro to check his privilege. Asking someone to consider their standing is like totes stopping rational discussion *eye-roll*.

        And as for self-congratulatory back patting? I’m just so freakin’ sorry that women are stoked that for once someone is talking about something that actually impacts them on here! We’re actually being included in a discussion about left-wing politics. Someone is speaking out about the frustration so many of us have felt for so long. How dare we praise that…

        • Danielle 20.2.2.1

          I think perhaps there’s a feeling that if everyone is *very quiet*, the feminists will go away. As though we aren’t always in the room…

          • Brett 20.2.2.1.1

            You should probably take a zinc or magnesium supplement, it will help calm you down and you won’t feel so angry, especially around that time of the month

            • Danielle 20.2.2.1.1.2

              Aren’t you embarrassed to be such a fucking hack, Brett? I’d love to have some truly original expressions of sexism to fill out my bingo card instead of this tired-ass shit.

              • Brett

                Ha Ha, you girls bite like big sharks 🙂

                http://planetoddity.com/shocking-sexism-vintage-ads/
                Some good ones in there, might even get a few made up as tee shirts

                • muerk

                  Brett: I love men, I’m married to one and I have four wonderful sons. I have no idea what you are like in real life or how you treat women in person, but the things you have said here irritate me.

                  Whether you accept it or not women often have to deal with sexism and honestly… it’s tiresome and annoying. Just so as you take me a little bit more seriously of course I have to state that right now I’m not menstruating. Actually since you mention it I’m on day 10 of my cycle and I should be coming into my fertile phase in about 6 days. Now will you listen to me? Now you are assured that my weak female mind isn’t made distraught by an ocean of womanly hormones?

                  Oh and just to really make sure that I’m actually _rationally_ pissed off with you instead of just a slave to my girlish moods I should tell you that I take an iron supplement and I eat lots of oily fish.

                  Will you respect me as a rational person now?

                  • Daveo

                    Brett is clearly a virgin and likely to remain one for some time. Sad for him but probably the best outcome for the species.

                  • Brett

                    Sorry about that chief,probably not the right audience.

                    I must move in sightly different social circles to most here and it’s pretty common place for guys and girls to joke about this sort of stuff.

                    • muerk

                      I think there are contexts when this kind of comment can be funny, but it’s pretty insulting when it’s brought up in this kind of discussion.

                      I do appreciate your apology.

                  • HoneMeke

                    ‘Actually since you mention it I’m on day 10 of my cycle and I should be coming into my fertile phase in about 6 days. Now will you listen to me? Now you are assured that my weak female mind isn’t made distraught by an ocean of womanly hormones?’

                    I’ve read this blog for some time, yet have never really wanted to wade into the debate for one reason or another. Today, I do so for no other reason than just to say, I find that which I’ve have quoted above to be one of the best internet burns I’ve ever encountered.

                    capcha: lacked – I sure did lack any meaningful analysis relative to patriarchy’s intertwining with capitalism to marginalise women. However, sometimes you feel compelled to give props where they’re due, without giving any rational insight as to why you’ve done so.

            • A Nonny Moose 20.2.2.1.1.3

              Trittity trot, trittity trot…who’s that walking over MY bridge?

              http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#overemotional

            • QoT 20.2.2.1.1.4

              Who’ll give me $5 that Brett whinges about ads showing men as base creatures whose thoughts are controlled by their dicks? Anyone? Buellerette?

        • Gina 20.2.2.2

          Boganette

          Im with you sister and I feel your pain re the abusive comments designed to smear us frighten us and to harm women in general.

          I remember when Susan Wood fronted closeup she mentioned their was a secret group of anti-feminists meeting in NZ with the aim of putting women back a few hunderd years.

          Does anyone know anything about this group. I’m asking because the same people make the same comments every time I make a feminist type I comment on a blog. I know Nadis has said the iderntical same thging to me about 95% of society recoiling from my ideas. Ha women don’t recoil when the men arn’t looking sorry.

          We are dealing with a small group of antifeminists who are all over the feminist websites. Its like a war to these nutters. Personally I wouldnt publish their comments as they seek to frighten women away from those blogs and we waste too much time defending basic ground but that is every bloggers personal choice.

          • Boganette 20.2.2.2.1

            I personally don’t think there is a secret group of anti-feminists. I just think there are lots of really stupid, lonely dudes out there. Brett being one of them.

            They’re just lashing out because they’re confused by all the big words.

          • lprent 20.2.2.2.2

            Personally I wouldnt publish their comments as they seek to frighten women away from those blogs and we waste too much time defending basic ground but that is every bloggers personal choice.

            One of my target indicators on this site is the steadily rising percentage of women who comment here. We try to keep the worst of the abuse trimmed off and will deal with anyone that we consider is trolling repetitive comments and obviously unable to debate. But as intended it is a pretty open comment section, so you’re going to get challenges. My general advice is to polish the art of the cutting comment that undermines and makes the person you’re replying to look a bit ridiculous. Best advice about how to do that – read felix.

            • QoT 20.2.2.2.2.1

              But as intended it is a pretty open comment section, so you’re going to get challenges.

              No one objects to challenges, lprent. But women-run blogs, especially explicitly feminist ones, don’t just get “challenges”. They get rape and death threats.

              Which is not to say you would ever allow that sort of thing, but it bugs me to see “abuse” and “challenge” conflated in that context.

              • lprent

                Sorry I was talking in the wrong context because I was thinking of this blog. I do try to humiliate anyone who offends too much as a matter of policy – they find it discouraging. IMO: blogs need background ogres to do the job of civilizing by being pretty damn uncivil. Of course having the power to pursue recidivists back into real life when required helps a lot as well.

      • QoT 20.2.3

        Well, ball’s in your court, ATN. Can you look past your privilege?

    • QoT 20.3

      If I’m not very much mistaken, she’s come looking for a bit of a tussle.

      Fuck yeah I was. Trying to settle for a smug sense of self-vindication but it’s just not getting my bitchy hormonal-girl cattiness juices flowing, if you know what I mean.

    • handle 20.4

      Lew, it’s a love-fest only if you include the self-lovin from the bitchy douche who calls itself Pollywog. Two threads in a row, what a big man.

      • pollywog 20.4.1

        eat a dick handle…

        …i cut mine off, fried it up with some onions and had it for dinner last night

        it was quite liberating…now i’m just like you !!!

  20. ak 21

    Turn up and argue your corner like you’ve got a pair

    Frankly I’m apalled at this blatant sexist slur Lew (and anyway, everyone knows a pair won’t beat a flush….)

    c: smiles

  21. muerk 22

    Mining and unions have a long and important history here on the Coast. It’s a very working class area and usually the West Coast has voted Labour. Yet how many women go underground (as miners) in New Zealand? I don’t know of any women who work as miners here on the Coast and I have been told that the men would not accept or allow a woman to work underground.

    There is definitely a strand of old fashioned working class man who likes to work hard, get a good wage, drink his beer at the pub and have the wife at home with the kids doing the housework. I’ve had a miner’s partner tell me that he griped to her, his position was that he worked hard putting his life on the line every shift and he wanted to come home to a hot meal and a tidy house.

    This kind of left philosophy was once utterly common but now the political left has changed and isn’t so much of a voice for the old fashioned working class man. I know men for whom leftist politics is about the conflict of the working man versus management, and women, Maori and queers have nothing to do with anything except for the university educated boffins who took over the Labour Party.

    I disagree with Trotter, but I can see why someone would hold the views he does because I know people like that personally (and then some).

    • Carol 22.1

      Well, I think there needs to be more communication between the different factions and some more understanding of everyone’s issues.

      I can understand the desire to have someone cook the meals and do the housework when one is working long hard hours to earn a living. Many women work such long hard hours, but only a few fortunate ones have anyone to put the meal on the table for them.

      I don’t have a lot to do with miners, though when I was teaching in London at the time of the miners’ strike in the early 80s, we had miners come and talk to our staff. After that the staff regularly contributed to collections of basic neccessities to give to the striking miners. Feminists, “queers” and all kinds of different factions were joined together in that struggle.

      Also, I don’t think some people realise just how much of a struggle life is for people who relate to a “different” identity. I grew up as a (very closetted) lesbian, which was particularly hard for me in my teens, mostly in the 60s. It was very repressive times and I was dealing with it when I first started working, and before I went to Uni. Part of it was when Muldoon governed. It was also a very difficult time to be a single women – less career opportunities for women, and difficult to exist socially without a male partner. I knew one or two gays who topped themselves back then. Life was just too difficult.

      I got very depressed and isolated, and basically saw no point in living; my country just seemed to be treating me really badly. It seemed to operate mostly for the benefit of white, middleclass males. If I hadn’t left NZ and gone to London when I did, I probably would have drunk myself into a stupor, ended up on the streets or in an early grave, one way or another.

      The idea that LGBT people are just a bunch of privileged middleclass people is very far from the truth. For “queers” of my age, it’s been a long hard struggle. And finally it was a relief that the Clark gvoernment were so willing to work for us.

      I don’t see why, we cannot recognise our specific issues and work together. Sometimes I have benefitted from a middleclass background – getting an education was the one thing I had to hold onto eventually. But I’ve always understood that people in other areas of life, with different identities (whether it’s miner, working class man or woman, Maori etc), all have particular struggles to deal with.

      We will achieve more working together, hassling over our different issues, than getting fragmented. Ofcourse the neoliberal media has done a good job of undermining each of these struggles: eg, the way Labour’s “closing the gap” policies wre dropped because of the negative press.

  22. Draco T Bastard 23

    People on the left almost invariably accept that the injustices that you mention happen and need to be researched and stopped. So, that’s not the problem but there is a problem and the problem is Identity Politics.

    We have a fairly major poverty rate in NZ and of those in poverty most are Maori. So, we get the left (last government anyway) saying that they will target helping Maori. This will, inevitably, alienate the people in those same straights who aren’t Maori. So when Don Brash stood up and said, in an overtly racist speech, one rule for all he got a huge amount of support from the people that Identity Politics had alienated. They didn’t mean to alienate them but that’s what happens when you go round putting people into lots of small groups that most people don’t identify with.

    Yes, there are injustices, yes they are focussed towards peoples identity but Identity Politics isn’t the way to address them. That will actually make things worse.

    • just saying 23.1

      Preliminary reply-
      women -51 percent of the population

      edit – opps females, obviously

    • QoT 23.2

      I refer you to the bit of the post where I said:

      when a capitalist society chooses to force identity markers on you to aid in its goals, the shit you get for having those markers is probably going to be a bit relevant to your interests.

      Feminists didn’t go around putting people into groups. Society did that. Capitalism needed a vast unpaid workforce to raise the next generation of workers and voila, women became tantamount to property.

      And as I noted in post 1, feminists tried to play along with the left crowd. They kept making the coffee and Doing Their Bit and then finally it dawned that the left wasn’t going to do fuck all for them unless they did it themselves.

      Frankly, Draco, what you’re saying sounds a lot like a repeat of what the male lefties were saying then: “your issues aren’t as important, we can’t alienate white men, please sit down like good little girls and shut up”.

      I mean, did I just write a shitload explaining how this has been lathered, rinsed and repeated for decades and maybe someone could get the idea that it doesn’t work out so well or didn’t I? I’ve offered a spin, I’ve offered an approach, and all it fucking takes is for the mainstream left to grow a fucking spine and do it, because whinging about The Poor Menz has done fuck-all to damage National’s popular dominance.

    • QoT 23.3

      Argh, just lost a massive comment.

      To wit: I think I basically address this all already, Draco.

      1. “People” on the left (there’s that very specific use of “people” again) on the left are yet again telling women, Maori, LGBT folk and even the poor to STFU because we need to suck up to lower-class working white men. Which hasn’t exactly worked at all.

      2. Telling women that their issues are totally important but we have a revolution to run, sweeties, well get to you later is an historically-proven stupid tactic.

      3. See my conclusion. Maybe if Labour had grown a fucking spine and made a strong statement against Brash (instead of trying to basically RECREATE his rhetoric) then a good chunk of the Left wouldn’t have stayed at home last election.

      You are welcome to suggest alternatives that don’t involve telling groups, whose identity is not chosen but is forced on them by capitalism in order to facilitate their exploitation, to be quiet while the white men are talking.

  23. just saying 24

    “People on the left almost invariably accept that the injustices that you mention happen and need to be researched and stopped.”

    More research yeah that’s whats needed. And those that do accept that there are injustices, often, like you don’t think they are important, like the REAL issues. Apparently those wanting action on these petty little concerns are the real problem for the left.

    Oh, and here’s a minority group for you, that most don’t identify with (yet)…the left itself. so shall we jettison the whole thing seeing it’s just alienating the majority?

    And finally,
    Other than “research” what do you suggest the left should do to stop these injustices? Because concentrating on other matters clearly isn’t working – otherwise these “identity” groups (one of which is actually the majority of the population) wouldn’t keep bugging you with their petty concerns.

    • A Nonny Moose 24.1

      “Other than “research” what do you suggest the left should do to stop these injustices?”

      Be excellent to each other?

      See women as people?

      I know, pithy. But really, it comes down to some bloody obvious basics.

    • Draco T Bastard 24.2

      And those that do accept that there are injustices, often, like you don’t think they are important, like the REAL issues.

      I suggest going back and re-reading what I wrote because I didn’t say that.

  24. Tiger Mountain 25

    Silence is often a form of condoning my partner reckons, so maybe more people agree with the two posts than first imagined, but I get the feeling Lew is saying in respect of the QoT posts silence is also a form of passive aggression via non engagement. Well after such a nice invitation I guess someone should be first up for the month to get a good slippering from Lew.

    Any aspiring ‘left’ man worthy of the salutation should be supportive of all exploited and oppressed groups and individuals anywhere. In a practical manner. Nothing less will do. This includes personal life, such as fair division of labour in domestic situations. It includes real listening and communication, child rearing and ensuring partners have space and separate friendships and interests as desired. If people are theoretical lefties and personal bastards there is indeed no reason to put up with their hypocrisy.

    In the mid 80s I wore a pink HUG badge at work. “Heterosexuals Unafraid of Gays”, rather quaint and a bit ‘off’ perhaps these days, but we marched and campaigned and assisted this matter through to a legislative change. Smug Ponsonby tory gays really tick me off, as do the same straight tory types, but so what in the scheme of things? gay kiwis human rights was the bigger issue needing to be asserted and supported by the wider community. I marched to jeers and threats up Queen St supporting Irish H block hunger strikers, Nuclear Free NZ, two Waitangi hikoi, and so on. And by day for 20 years worked in a tough blue collar environment, for a company that ran factories in Pinochets Chile and apartheid South Africa. An uncompromising thug corporate citizen. But not in NZ, they had to respect the workers onsite organisation and certain laws. I learnt and participated in South Auckland Maori, Pasifika and several Asian cultures. A certain Hone worked there for a bit too, and consciously decided to devote his efforts to indigenous struggles.

    And that was fine by me. My point being that important issues to self and group are often linked. My version of left politics has always been unite all who can be united on any particular issue so we can all move forward together. Sounds dated eh? What do you mean ‘we’ white man etc. The old NZCP for example was instrumental in the “no Maoris, no tour” campaign of 1960. Which demand later moved on to “stop the tour” in 81. Things progress and then they sometimes regress. The individualist pull of Neo liberalism has seen a hiatus and disruption in many things, public participation (non sponsored) in politics and community for instance.

    Some do not subscribe to the notion that being exploited or oppressed should necessarily require you to become left wing. Well if you don’t go left the main other option is to be aspirational and then pull the ladder up behind you. Most women/Maori/Sri Lankans are doing crap but I’m on $100k! Lets buy it!

    There is a bit of mild scapegoating here I feel from QoT, a class analysis provides a framework for some of us, it is not compulsory. One can devote a life to animal rights or any single issue, or none if desired. Sexism, racism and base exploitation though should be natural enemies of all that claim to be left. Sure the first sting of oppression is often experienced in a sharp personal way-a man, white man, cop, adult, mean boss, someone inevitably with more power than you deals to you. And as it happens, you may end up dealing to someone less powerful than you as a twisted outlet. But as life goes on who and what is the main problem for most people and the planet remains a significant question.

    ‘Identity politics’ as a reasonably recent term, ultimately assists oppression if it ends up promoting division. Divide and rule is a major device and tactic of the capitalist class. People with lots in common are persuaded that differences are more important than the underlying commonality. So there is persistent post colonial racism towards Maori and new non European migrants, though “Ten pound Poms” were also derided in the 50s and 60s. “Girls can do anything” but women are still paid less than men, John Keys government is a demonstrateably anti woman government, Pay Equity forum disbanded, ECE up-priced etc. Women are assaulted and derided in the wealthiest of settings so it is not all about socio economic status but brutalist capitalism sets the tone for human as well as economic relations.

    • QoT 25.1

      I don’t think everyone needs a class analysis, TM, but was trying to establish how a lot of issues core to “identity politics” do come down to essentially economic/class/workers’ issues.

    • Lew 25.2

      I’m just stoked someone has decided to stand on their convictions and make a counter-argument, loud and clear (although perhaps in more measured terms than you’ve previously made it to me). Bravo, TM, you’re a fucking role model.

      My critique is the same as ever: all the reasons to yaw to the left are good, but fundamentally such a class analysis as you prescribe cannot be compulsory. It cannot be a condition of support. The left must support the marginalised, to the extent they are marginalised, while not being blind to other matters of context. Although I hate the term, an illustrative example is one you imply: the ‘trophy wife’ who might enjoy privileges of class and social status, most probably ethnicity and so on, but may nevertheless be kept a virtual slave by her husband, her movements and social agency controlled, possibly subject to domestic violence and sexual coercion and so on. Like the fairytale princess in the tower, she is both hugely privileged and greatly oppressed. The fact that she has a BMW and a house with seven bedrooms and a hot tub must not disqualify her from support on feminist grounds; if she’s being controlled and constrained and exploited, it is so regardless of the other aspects of her situation. (Of course, those aspects can’t be ignored, either, and nobody suggests they should be.)

      This is fundamentally the point, though QoT’s posts come at the issue from the opposite direction: that the feminist analysis must be integral to modern leftist political praxis, and this I agree with, and when framed in such terms I don’t think it’s a very contentious statement. The same principle applies otherwise, to matters of ethnicity and ableness and sexual orientation and so on.

      Objections emerge on the grounds of scarcity. There is a sort of zero-sum jealousy felt by those who, to a large extent, have traditionally ‘possessed’ the traditional class critique: the white working-class men of Muerk’s anecdote. I believe they fear that the need to accomodate issues outside their own relatively narrow band of marginalisation will dilute the praxis and rob them of their ‘rightful’ share of the class war’s spoils. My response is that it’s not really zero-sum, that the claims of women, and tangata whenua, and so on are not in competition with the claims of traditional workers, but are complementary. Expanding the base of the left brings in fresh troops for that war against marginalisation and injustice, which the left sorely needs.

      L

      • M 25.2.1

        ‘My critique is the same as ever: all the reasons to yaw to the left are good, but fundamentally such a class analysis as you prescribe cannot be compulsory. It cannot be a condition of support. The left must support the marginalised, to the extent they are marginalised, while not being blind to other matters of context. Although I hate the term, an illustrative example is one you imply: the ‘trophy wife’ who might enjoy privileges of class and social status, most probably ethnicity and so on, but may nevertheless be kept a virtual slave by her husband, her movements and social agency controlled, possibly subject to domestic violence and sexual coercion and so on. Like the fairytale princess in the tower, she is both hugely privileged and greatly oppressed. The fact that she has a BMW and a house with seven bedrooms and a hot tub must not disqualify her from support on feminist grounds; if she’s being controlled and constrained and exploited, it is so regardless of the other aspects of her situation. (Of course, those aspects can’t be ignored, either, and nobody suggests they should be.)’

        Lew, this is gold.

        • pollywog 25.2.1.1

          The left must BLAH BLAH BLAH…

          or what Lew ?…and what must the right do ?

          • Lew 25.2.1.1.1

            In my view, it must do these things (and plenty others, many of which I’ve also written about) or it will continue to be spanked by the right, as it is being spanked at present.

            L

  25. prism 26

    Brett is an attention seeker and time waster. He says that women bite like sharks. Well he does know how to be provocative. He? is probably responsible for at least 200 of the last 1000 comments. Ignoring him might be a good idea, though his comments prompt thought and justification with reasoned retorts so perhaps he can be an aid to discussion. Though I think in small doses.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Hard News: Dealer’s Choice, an oral history from Planet 1994
    In 1994, I was the editor for an issue of Planet magazine focused on cannabis, its culture and the prospects for the end of its prohibition. Part of that issue was an interview with 'Ringo', an experienced cannabis dealer.I recently posted my essay from that issue, and I figured it ...
    11 hours ago
  • The invasion of women’s sports by men: some facts
    Dr Helen Waite, sports sociologist and former elite athlete, on the invasion of women’s sport by men and the anti-scientific and misogynist ideology used to rationalise it.   ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    12 hours ago
  • Remainers starting to sound like fascists
    As Brexit comes to a grisly conclusion (perhaps) people on all sides are saying intemperate and uwise things.  Some, like the Daly Mail, have been doing it for years.People as normally level headed as Jon Lansman are calling for automatic deselection of MPs who vote against a (likely) Labour three ...
    13 hours ago
  • Labour MPs supporting Johnson’s turd-sandwich deal?
    I find this unbelievable:
    I've got one source saying more Labour MPs than expected are mulling whether to vote for the deal - including names who were not on the letter to Juncker and Tusk— Emilio Casalicchio (@e_casalicchio) 17 October 2019 I've compiled a list of possible reasons why Labour ...
    1 day ago
  • Why do we need control orders again?
    On Wednesday, the government was loudly telling us that it needed to legislate to allow it to impose "control orders" - effectively a parole regime, but imposed without charge, prosecution, conviction or real evidence - on suspected terrorists because they couldn't be prosecuted for their supposed crimes. Today, it turns ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Bullshitting the Minister
    On Monday, the Hit and Run inquiry heard from NZDF's former director of special operations, who claimed that the defence Minister knew everything about the Operation Burnham raid. Today, the inquiry heard from that (former) Minister - and it turns out that he didn't know nearly as much as NZDF ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Speaker: Extinction Rebellion is not a cult (but ecstasy for the people)
    Yoga gurus and cult leaders – I’ve seen a few. Two weeks ago, I unknowingly joined an alleged new-age cult at the Kāpiti coast, together with a giant kraken and some neatly dressed pensioners who would make any book club proud.They were among the two hundred people of all ages ...
    2 days ago
  • We need to bring the police under control
    The last decade has seen a trend of increasing weapons availability to police. Assault rifles. Tasers on every hip. Guns in cars. And following the march 15 massacre, pistols on every hip, all over the country. At the same time, its also seen an increase in the abuse of force: ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • If you can’t measure it, does it exist?
    In the last couple of weeks, I’ve been busy preparing for our summer paper on Science Communication. Looking for something amusing about ‘risk’ in science, I came across this neat xkcd.com cartoon about why so many people come knocking on my door (or phoning me, or emailing me) desperately wanting ...
    SciBlogsBy Marcus Wilson
    2 days ago
  • Swinson’s swithering
    Jo Swinson is doing even worse at this Being Sensible lark that I'd thought.  I've just become aware of the following utterance
    .@KayBurley presses Lib Dem leader @joswinson on whether she would agree to a #Brexit deal 'no matter how bad a deal it is' as long as it had ...
    2 days ago
  • Women’s rights, trans ideology and Gramsci’s morbid symptoms
    by John Edmundson The International Socialist Organisation (ISO) have recently reposted a February article, by Romany Tasker-Poland, explaining ISO’s position in the “trans rights” debate.  It is available on their website and on their Facebook Page.  The article sets out to explain why “socialists support trans rights”.  It reads more ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 days ago
  • We need to take guns off police
    Today's IPCA report of police criminality: a police officer unalwfully tasered a fleeing suspect who posed no threat to anyone:The police watchdog has found an officer unlawfully tasered an Auckland man who broke his ankle jumping off a balcony to escape arrest. [...] To avoid arrest, the man jumped over ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • “Bringing kindness back”
    "Auckland City Mission: 10% of Kiwis experiencing food insecurity", RNZ, 16 October 2019:About half a million people are experiencing food insecurity, according to new research from the Auckland City Mission. Food insecurity, or food poverty, is defined as not having enough appropriate food. The City Mission said over the last ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • Press Release: “Fake News” from Auckland City Council CCOs Board Chairs re pay and performance b...
    Media Statement for Immediate Release 16th October 2019 “Fake News” from Auckland City Council CCOs Board Chairs re pay and performance bonuses for top managers Despite comments from Auckland City Council CCOs Board Chairs re pay and performance bonuses for top managers—Herald Newspaper Tuesday Oct 15th–there is very little evidence ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    3 days ago
  • Ever-So-Slightly Bonkers: Simon Bridges Plays To His Base.
    Would You Buy A Used Propaganda Video From This Man? Bridges and the National Party’s strategists have discovered that the ideas and attitudes considered acceptable by today’s editors and journalists are no longer enforceable. The rise and rise of the Internet and the social media platforms it spawned means that ...
    3 days ago
  • Asking for food
    There is plenty of evidence of the way the business mentality has permeated every level of society since the recrudescence of market liberalism 35 years ago. You only need to think of how citizens in need of help from their government, their state, their country, are now routinely described as ...
    Opposable ThumbBy Unknown
    3 days ago
  • Forty years of change in the jobs Kiwi do and the places they call home
    John MacCormick Over the last 40 years, New Zealanders – and people in other countries – have experienced big changes in the jobs they do and where they live and work. These changes include: a decline in manufacturing jobs an increase in jobs in ‘information-intensive’ industries (which are better paid ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    3 days ago
  • Protecting Fresh Waterways in Aotearoa/NZ: The Strong Public Health Case
    Nick Wilson, Leah Grout, Mereana Wilson, Anja Mizdrak, Phil Shoemack, Michael Baker Protecting waterways has the benefits of: (1) protecting water from hazardous microbes; (2) minimising cancer risk and other problems from nitrates in water; (3) avoiding algal blooms that are hazardous to health; (4) protecting mahinga kai uses (cultural ...
    SciBlogsBy Public Health Expert
    3 days ago
  • Massey University triggered to rebrand
    by The Council of Disobedient Women In a press release today Massey University announced it has decided to rebrand and reorientate after struggling to be a University for grown-ups. For some time the University has wanted to be a safe play space for wee-woke-misogynists who have been really badly triggered ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    3 days ago
  • Swinson backing calls for a second referendum (again)
    After a brief dalliance with 'hard Revoke' it looks like the Lib Dems are changing ground on on Brexit, with leader Jo Swinson reverting to calling for a second referendum on Johnson's deal.The party has tabled an amendment to the Queen’s speech requesting that any deal brought back from Brussels ...
    3 days ago
  • An odious bill
    The government has decided that someone has done Something Bad. But despite their belief, there seems to be no evidence that they have actually broken the law. So the government's solution is to pass a retrospective law allowing them to be punished anyway, on a lower standard of proof. If ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • National is now the party of climate arson
    So, Judith Collins has done a Facebook rant about climate change, peddling the same shit National has been shovelling for the past twenty years: the impacts are overstated, there's no need to do anything about it, and its too hard anyway (oh, and its so unfair that people who peddle ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • The environmental footprint of electric versus fossil car
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz There is a lot of discussion on the benefits of ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    4 days ago
  • “Manifest” by Andrew Bird – A Song For The Times.
    I came across this song quite by accident. If it isn't one of Greta Thunberg's favourites - it should be.Video courtesy of YouTube.This post is exclusive to Bowalley Road. ...
    4 days ago
  • Passing the buck
    Last month, NZDF's shoddy coverup of what it knew about civilian casualties in Operation Burnham began to fall apart, with the revelation that a report on the matter, which NZDF claimed not to have, had been sitting in an NZDF safe for the past nine years. Yesterday, the man responsible ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • India a major player in Earth observation satellites
    While many imagine that countries like the USA and Europe dominate space activities, in fact India is now a major player on this stage. It launches satellites for its own purposes and also commercially, and has constellations orbiting our planet and returning data of vital importance to that nation in ...
    SciBlogsBy Duncan Steel
    4 days ago
  • The rot at the top (2).
    Thanks to a report from the Acting Inspector General of Intelligence and Security following a complaint by Nicky Hager, we have come to find out that the SIS illegally spied on Mr. Hager on behalf of the NZDF after publication of Hager’s 2011 book, Other People’s Wars. The NZDF justified ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    4 days ago
  • Common misconceptions about “Global Warming”
    COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING MYTH 1: Global temperatures are rising at a rapid, unprecedented rate. FACT: The HadCRUT3 surface temperature index, produced by the Hadley Centre of the UK Met Office and the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, shows warming to 1878, cooling to 1911, ...
    An average kiwiBy admin@averagekiwi.com
    4 days ago
  • A climate of tyranny
    For the past week, Extinction Rebellion has been peacefully protesting in London to demand action on climate change. The British government's response? Ban their protests:Police have banned Extinction Rebellion protests from continuing anywhere in London, as they moved in almost without warning to clear protesters who remained at the movement’s ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Collins crushes climate
    An essay by Judith Collins MP reported on Carbon News yesterday seems to show an alarming shift in attitude within the National Party. Collins argues against the Zero Carbon Bill, the Paris Agreement, and downplays the magnitude of climate impacts. The Paris Agreement was adopted in December 2015 and ratified ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert McLachlan
    5 days ago
  • More disappointment
    When they were running for election, Labour promised to overhaul the Employment Relations Act and introduce fair pay agreements to set basic pay and conditions on an industry level, preventing bad employers from undercutting good ones. They followed this up by establishing a working group, which reported back in January ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • What do these mother-child studies really say about fluoridation?
    A list of indicators of bad science – many of these are found in articles promoted by anti-fluoride activists. Anti-fluoride activists have been pouring money into a scaremongering campaign warning pregnant women not to drink fluoridated water. They claim fluoride will lower the IQ of their future child. Fluoride ...
    5 days ago
  • Losing Labour’s Mills-Tone.
    Nothing Left To Say: Labour's pollster, Stephen Mills, remains swaddled-up in the comforting myths of the 1980s. As if the experience of Roger Douglas’s genuinely radical post-Muldoon policy agenda was literally a once-in-a-lifetime thing – as much as the party could possibly absorb for at least the next 50 years.MEMO ...
    5 days ago
  • Speaker: Disability and the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse
    The Royal Commission on abuse in care is very significant for the disability community. For many decades last century, thousands of disabled children, and adults who managed to survive, were locked away from families and communities. This was not for anything they had done, but for the perceived threat their ...
    5 days ago
  • Spain is not a democracy
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • UK Conservatives hate democracy
    With an unfair voting system, uneven electorates and an un-elected upper house, the UK's "democracy" is barely worthy of the name. But now the government wants to make it worse:The government has been accused of suppressing voters’ rights with the potential disenfranchisement of tens of thousands of people after plans ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • What is wrong with our building industry?
    Back in the 90's and early 2000's, the building industry was building leaky homes which should never have been granted consent. Now it turns out they've been building dodgy office blocks as well:New imaging technology has revealed hundreds of major buildings nationwide have defective or missing concrete or reinforcing steel. ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Local bodies
    Local body election results were released over the weekend, to joy or despair depending on where you live. In Auckland, Phil Goff trounced John Tamihere, who is muttering darkly about running for Parliament again (but which party would want him?) Wellington is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Weta Workshop, except ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • A future of government
      How could government evolve over the next decades? Reports of democracy’s imminent demise are greatly exaggerated.  However, satisfaction with political systems in many countries is low, so there is much to do for governments of all political stripes to improve relevance and trust. Digital technologies are seen as one ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert Hickson
    1 week ago
  • Speaker: Catalonia, interrupted
    Two years have now gone by since the Friday afternoon when my university-student son and I headed out of our Barcelona flat to a nearby primary school, designated as a polling station for the vote that was to be held the following Sunday: the referendum on Catalonia’s independence from Spain ...
    1 week ago
  • Sage Decisions Unwisely Over-Ruled.
    Overruled: The joint decision of Finance Minister, Grant Robertson (Labour) and his Associate Minister, David Parker (Labour) arguably the two most powerful ministers in Jacinda Ardern’s government, to grant OceanaGold the consents which Land Information Minister, Eugenie Sage (Greens) had earlier denied them, offers bitter proof of how hard fighting ...
    1 week ago
  • Government may ban voting in effort to get more people to do it
    More than double the number of people who will vote in this year’s local body elections have tried marijuana or urinated somewhere they shouldn’t have. As local elections look set for the lowest turnout in decades, with many regions falling well short of 40%, the Government is exploring a number ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • Woman: Deleted.
    A Statement on Abortion Law Reform by the Council of Disobedient Women   On the eve of bringing an end to antiquated, anti-women abortion laws Green MP Jan Logie intends to write women out of the Bill. With a stroke of the pen, the woke are aiming for total erasure ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • The Hollowest of Men Ride Again… SURPRISE!
    Musings continue apace about “the experienced businessman!” soon to be taking up a National Party MP position. Or to be more accurate, being parachuted into a seat to shut down their former MP Jamie-Lee Ross, who despite his own shortcomings shed at least some more light on the inner workings ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    1 week ago
  • Barbaric
    The Ugandan government wants to murder gay people:Uganda has announced plans to impose the death penalty on homosexuals. The bill, colloquially known as “Kill the Gays” in Uganda, was nullified five years ago on a technicality, but the government said on Thursday it plans to resurrect it within weeks. The ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Fighting Monsters.
    Freedom Of Speech? The Säuberung (cleansing by fire) was the work of the German Student Union which, on 10 May 1933, under the watchful eye of the Nazi Reichminister for Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, consigned 25,000 books to the flames in a ritual exorcism of “un-German thought”. According to the logic of the ...
    1 week ago
  • The next wave of kaupapa Māori politics: its constitutional, it must be.
      “There can be no such thing as kaupapa Māori political parties or politics in Aotearoa” (Willie Jackson, Labour Party (2017). Māori TV, General/List Election Special) I begin with that claim because at the time, I was confounded at first that it fell out of Willie Jackson’s mouth, and then ...
    EllipsisterBy Ellipsister
    1 week ago
  • Night lights of NZ from orbit
    New Zealand has prided itself for decades with regard to its lack of pollution, and all will be aware that the ‘100% Pure New Zealand‘ meme is under threat through land, water and air pollution of various causes. There is another type of contamination that the country also faces: light ...
    SciBlogsBy Duncan Steel
    1 week ago
  • Reporters deliver uplifting news to fleeing Japanese residents: they won’t miss any rugby
    New Zealand’s media is doing its part in Japan, reassuring those in the path of the storm that they won’t miss any rugby while away from their flooded homes. New Zealand sports reporters stationed in Japan for the Rugby World Cup have had the rare and heartwarming opportunity to inform ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • Government in contentious discussions about whether to put surplus on red or black
    Regional Development Minister Shane Jones is the only Cabinet member in favour of putting it all on green. As Finance Minister Grant Robertson finds himself with an enormous $7.5 billion surplus, the Government has begun intense, at times contentious conversations about whether to put the money on red or black at ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • Jordanian teachers’ successful strike has lessons for here
    by Susanne Kemp At the start of September close to 100,000 school teachers went on strike in Jordan.  They demanded a 50% pay rise.  A pay rise actually agreed to by the regime back in 2014. In early October, however, in the face of government repression and threats, the teachers’ ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • Why some people still think climate change isn’t real
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz Why do people still think climate change isn’t real? David ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • The SIS unlawfully spied on Nicky Hager
    Back in 2011, journalist Nicky Hager published Other People's Wars, an expose on NZDF's activities over the previous decade of the "war on terror". NZDF didn't like this, and especially didn't like the fact that it was base don leaks from their own. So, they had the SIS investigate him ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • October 2019 – Newsletter
    https://mailchi.mp/7d9133add053/closing-the-gap-october-2019-newsletter ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    1 week ago
  • And they wonder why we think they’re environmental vandals…
    The Zero Carbon Bill is due back from select committee in two weeks, and will likely pass its final stages in November. So naturally, farmers are planning a hate-march against it. But they're not just demanding lower methane targets so they can keep on destroying the planet; they're also demanding ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Paying the price in California
    Last year, California burned. This year, to stop it happening again (or rather, to stop themselves from being found liable if it happens again), Pacific Gas and Electric is cutting power to half the state for a week:Schools are closed. Traffic lights down. Tunnels dark. Businesses unopened. Hospitals running on ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Let’s Hear It For Up-Close-And-Personal, Hard-Copy Democracy!
    The Best Way: Missing from the on-line voting debate is any reference to the voting system that produces turn-out figures ranging from 77 to 93 percent of registered voters. The voting system used to collect and count the votes cast in our parliamentary elections. The system that involves citizens making ...
    1 week ago
  • 10/10: World Day Against the Death Penalty
    Today, October 10, is the world day against the death penalty. Out of 195 UN member states, 84 still permit capital punishment. Today is the day we work to change that. This year's theme is children. Having a parent sentenced to death or executed causes long-term trauma and stigmatization which ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Talking Freer Lives: a Marxist gender-critical perspective from Australia
    Among the great new bunch of political friends we have been making recently is the excellent Australian-based Marxist gender-critical site, Freer Lives.  So we asked the comrade who set up that blog to write something for Redline on the blog, himself, his analysis of the rise of gender politics and ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • Government spin accepted by union leadership
    by Don Franks  The Auckland City Mission is struggling with a 40 percent increase in demand for food parcels this year. A total of 23,020 were needed by June. Last month Missioner Chris Farrelly told the Herald the “cupboards are bare” and without an emergency food drive, he can’t see ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • Forbidden Thoughts
    by The Council of Disobedient Women   Massey Wellington Student Association had a sit-in today. Imagine a sit-in. On a campus. Against a women’s rights meeting. Did the ’60s really happen or did we fucking dream it? They gathered in the student square, an echo chamber. Sitting on soft pillows ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • Much love to my loyal Ukrainian readership
    For some reasons, my post about the mystery message from inside the Downing Street bunker seemed to catch people's attention.  Quite a lot of hits from NZ (unsurprisingly) and the USA (a bit more puzzlingly, but hi there, USAians!!) and 76 views from the Ukraine.I've celebrated my Ukrainian readers in ...
    1 week ago
  • Another day of bonkers GNUmours (again, sorry)
    First, almost a score of Labour MPs seem to have sent a letter to the EU basically begging them to accept a deal - any deal - just so Britain can get the Heck on with Brexiting instead of being trapped in limbo:
    To avoid no deal, deliver on the ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour vs working class immigrants – again!
    by Phil Duncan In 2016 the National-led government suspended the Parent Visa Category, through which migrants were able to bring their parents into New Zealand.  Since then over 5,700 people have been in immigration limbo, stuck on the visa wait list. Labour is now bringing back the scheme.  Well, sort ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • Speak Up for Women press statement: on Massey University and Feminism 2020
    The following was released yesterday (Tues, October 8) by the women’s liberation organisation Speak Up for Women. On 23 September Speak Up For Women announced that we would be holding an event at the Massey University Theaterette in Wellington. The event is called Feminism 2020. The intention of the event ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • Farmers support dirty rivers
    The government is currently consulting on plans to improve freshwater quality. So naturally, farmers oppose it:South Taranaki farmers are preparing to fight proposed national freshwater changes that some fear will bankrupt them. The Government's proposed National Environment Standard on Freshwater Management, released in September, rated the Waingongoro River as one ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • No-one cares about local government
    Yesterday was the last day for (reliably) posting your vote away in local body elections. Turnouts are mostly much lower than the equivalent time last year (Palmerston North is down 2.3%), and so naturally people are pushing their online-voting snake oil again. Because the online census worked so well, lets ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • The political ghosts of eugenics may matter more than the genetic
    This essay, on the political legacy of the eugenics movement, by Kenan Malik was originally published in the Observer on 6 October 2019, under the headline ‘The spirit of eugenics is still with us, as immigrants know to their cost’. Birth control. Intelligence tests. Town planning. Immigration controls. It’s striking how ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    2 weeks ago
  • “Surplus” again
    Another year, and the government has announced another enormous government "surplus". And just like last year, its nothing of the sort. When we have people homeless and sick and hungry, when we have schools and hospitals still falling down, when we have underpaid public servants and infrastucture unmaintained or unbuilt, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Inside the Downing Street bunker
    James Forsyth at The Spectator (I know, I know) has tapped one of his contacts inside Number Ten for an insight into the Johnson administration's thinking and strategy.It is fascinating, unsettling and quite, quite mad.  Some key points:Negotiations have stalled and the Johnson administration are keen to blame the EU: ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Taking Control Of The Nation’s Story.
    Fatal Contact: With the arrival of captain James Cook in October 1769, the islands of what would become New Zealand ceased to be the preserve of Polynesian navigators and settlers and became a part of both the world’s map and the world’s history.THE MAORI NATIONALIST assault upon the historical meaning ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Are GNUs extinct?
    Another round of tactical talks about forming a Government of National Unity have come to nothing with the Liberal Democrats still refusing countenance putting Jeremy Corbyn into Downing Street:Opposition talks on Monday made little headway over when to try and vote down Boris Johnson's government and who might succeed him as ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Labour chickens out again
    When the government was elected, it promised to lead the way on electric vehicles, and specifically to make the government vehicle fleet emissions-free where-practicable by 2025.They lied:There are 15,473 vehicles in the government fleet and only 78 are electric. When the coalition Government came into power in late 2017, the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Transgender extremism, violence at work against feminist meeting at British Labour Party conference
    by Nick Rogers The debate around the meaning of sex and gender made an appearance at this year’s British Labour Party conference in Brighton. Women’s Place UK – an organisation that questions the demand that biological males who self-identify as woman should have access to women’s spaces, to all-women shortlists, ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Rebelling in Wellington
    Yesterday I went down to Wellington to participate in the Extinction Rebellion protest. Its part of the latest global wave of XR actions, with actions happening all over the world. Some of those protests are massively disruptive: in Canada, XR is blocking major bridges, stopping people from getting to work. ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago

  • Methane reducing cattle feed one step closer
    The Government today announced its support for a project that could substantially reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emissions from cattle. The announcement was made as part of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s and Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor’s visit to Nelson’s Cawthron Aquaculture Park. The Cawthron Institute will receive $100,000 from the Government’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Bill to refresh superannuation system passes first reading
    Social Development Minister Carmel Sepuloni has welcomed the first reading of the New Zealand Superannuation and Veteran’s Pension Legislation Amendment Bill. “Every New Zealander has a stake in New Zealand Superannuation and Veteran’s Pension,” says Carmel Sepuloni. “They are our most common form of social assistance – nearly 800,000 New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government announces next steps in fight against measles
    Babies in Auckland aged six months and over can receive a free vaccination and children will all have access to vaccines, Associate Minister of Health Julie Anne Genter announced today at Papatoetoe High School.   The move comes as part of Government efforts to step up the fight against measles. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Speech to the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, Pacific Futures: Connections, Identity...
    ***Check against delivery*** Good morning. It is a pleasure to be here, and to have the honour of opening this important conference on behalf of the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. Let us take the opportunity to acknowledge all the people who have helped make today possible, including our special ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Police trial new response to high risk events
    Police Minister Stuart Nash says the safety of frontline officers and members of the public will be the focus of a new trial of specialist Police response teams in three of our largest urban centres. Police have this morning released details of an initiative to be trialled in Counties Manukau, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New awards celebrate fisheries sustainability
    The Minister of Fisheries is calling for entries for a new public award to celebrate innovation in our seafood sector. “I have established the Seafood Sustainability Awards to recognise and celebrate those throughout industry, tangata whenua and communities who demonstrate outstanding dedication and innovation towards the sustainability of New Zealand’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • More progress for women and we can do more
    Minister for Women Julie Anne Genter welcomes leaders in the private sector taking action on closing their gender pay gaps to ensure a fairer workplace for all New Zealanders. Ms Genter today launched a new report, Addressing the gender pay gap and driving women’s representation in senior leadership, from the Champions for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Proposals to curb environmental damage help our coasts and the oceans
    Government Ministers today welcomed the release of a marine environment report highlighting the four key issues affecting our oceans, estuaries and coastlines.  The release underlines the importance of government proposals to combat climate pollution, ensure clean freshwater, protect biodiversity, make land use more sustainable, and reduce waste and plastic.    Environment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New mental health facility for Waikato
    The Government has approved funding for a new acute mental health facility for Waikato which will provide better care and support to people with mental health and addiction issues. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Health Minister Dr David Clark announced the $100 million project to replace the aging Henry Rongomau ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • 500 new te reo Māori champions in our classrooms
    The Government is making progress on its goal to integrate te reo Māori into education by 2025, with over 500 teachers and support staff already graduating from Te Ahu o te Reo Māori,  Associate Education Minister Kelvin Davis announced today. Kelvin Davis made the announcement at an awards ceremony in Waikanae today, for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Minister James Shaw welcomes 2018 Census first release
    Statistics Minister James Shaw has welcomed the first release of 2018 Census data. The first release of data today, 23 September, includes key data on population, regional growth, the number of homes and the size of different ethnic groups in New Zealand. Data from the 2018 Census will support the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Driving transparency, ethics and accountability in government use of algorithms
    Minister for Statistics James Shaw today announced a public consultation on a proposed algorithm charter for government agencies. The charter has been developed by the Government Chief Data Steward in response to growing calls for more transparency in government use of data. Computer algorithms – procedures or formulas for solving ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New Zealand and the Netherlands working together on climate change
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor, Climate Change Minister James Shaw and visiting Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte co-hosted a business roundtable in Auckland this morning focused on working together to address climate change.  “The Netherlands is an important partner for New Zealand. We share a strong agricultural history. Sustainable agribusiness and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Protecting fairness for workers and businesses
    The Government is taking action to build an inclusive economy where more of us receive our fair share at work and businesses can compete on great products and services, not undercutting wages and conditions, Immigration and Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Iain Lees-Galloway says. Two consultations launched today seek feedback ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Indigenous Freshwater Fish Bill Passes
    The future for New Zealand’s threatened indigenous freshwater fish looks brighter with the passing of the Conservation (Indigenous Freshwater Fish) Amendment Bill in Parliament today said Minister of Conservation, Eugenie Sage. “Until now, our freshwater fish legislation has been 20 years out of date. We have lacked effective tools to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Kiwis to take part in world’s biggest earthquake drill
    At 1.30pm tomorrow, hundreds of thousands of Kiwis will join about 65 million people around the globe in ShakeOut, the world’s biggest earthquake drill. The annual drill is to remind people of the right action to take during an earthquake which is to Drop, Cover, Hold, and to practise their ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Rising wages and low inflation supporting Kiwis
    Kiwis are benefiting from higher wage growth and low inflation under the Coalition Government. Stats NZ data out today shows the rise in the cost of living remains low, as annual Consumers Price Index (CPI) inflation fell to 1.5% in September from 1.7% in June. “The low inflation comes as ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • NZ economy strong amid global headwinds
    New Zealand’s economic strength and resilience has been recognised in a major update on the state of the global economy. The IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook released overnight shows a reduced global growth forecast over the next two years as issues like the US-China trade war and Brexit take hold. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Keeping New Zealanders safer with better counter-terrorism laws
    Justice Minister Andrew Little has today introduced a new Bill to prevent terrorism and support the de-radicalisation of New Zealanders returning from overseas. The Terrorism Suppression (Control Orders) Bill gives the New Zealand Police the ability to apply to the High Court to impose control orders on New Zealanders who ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Improved succession and dispute resolution core of Ture Whenua changes
    A Bill that proposes targeted changes to simplify the processes for Māori land owners when engaging with the Māori Land Court has had its First Reading today. “The approach taken by the Government is to ensure that the protection of Māori land remains a priority as we seek to improve ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Speech to CTU Biennial Conference
    Let me first thank all the new unionists and members in the room. There is nothing more important to improving people’s working lives than people making the decision to care, to get on board and help, to take up the reins and get involved. Congratulations to you. You bring the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Minister ensures continued Whenuapai flight operations
    Minister of Defence Ron Mark has signed a certificate exempting the activity of engine testing at Whenuapai Airbase from the Resource Management Act 1991. The Act gives the Minister of Defence the power to exempt activities for the purposes of national security.  The certificate will mean the recent Environment Court ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • NZ joins Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action
    Finance Minister Grant Robertson has announced New Zealand will join the Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action while attending APEC meetings in Chile. The objective of the 39 member Coalition is to share information and promote action to tackle climate change. It was formed in April this year, in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Feedback Sought – Section 71 – Lyttelton Parking
    Feedback sought– Lyttelton commercial zone parking  The Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration, Poto Williams, is seeking feedback on a proposal to remove on-site car parking requirements for new developments in the Lyttelton commercial zone.  The proposal, by Christchurch City Council, asks that powers under section 71 of the Greater ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Feedback Sought – Section 71 – Hagley Oval
    Hon Minister Poto Williams Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration   MEDIA STATEMENT       Tuesday 15 October 2019 Feedback sought – Hagley Oval The Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration, Poto Williams, is seeking feedback on a proposal about Hagley Oval. The proposal was developed by Regenerate Christchurch ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • CTU speech – DPM
    Ladies and gentlemen, NZCTU President Richard Wagstaff, members of respective unions – thank you for the invitation to speak to you today. This might be preaching to the choir, but the importance of trade unions in New Zealand’s historical arch is difficult to understate. And it is my belief that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Police Association Annual Conference
    "Let’s start by acknowledging that it has been a huge year. " Police Association Annual Conference James Cook Grand Chancellor Hotel Wellington Nau mai, haere mai. Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, ka nui te mihi, ki a koutou katoa. President of the Police Association, Chris Cahill; Members of the Association and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand announces a further P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark have announced the New Zealand Government’s decision to again deploy a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea. New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand deeply concerned at developments in north-east Syria
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says New Zealand continues to have serious concerns for peace and stability in north-east Syria. “Recent reports that hundreds of ISIS-affiliated families have fled from a camp are deeply concerning from a humanitarian and security perspective”, Mr Peters says. “While we acknowledge Turkey’s domestic security ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government on high alert for stink bugs
    Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor is warning travelling Kiwis to be vigilant as the high-season for the crop-eating brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB) is under way. “We’re on high alert to stop BMSB arriving in NZ. The high season runs until April 30 and we’ve strengthened our measures to stop stink ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Better protections for students in halls of residence
    The Government is moving swiftly to change the law to improve the welfare and pastoral care of students living in university halls of residence and other tertiary hostels. Cabinet has agreed to several changes, including creating a new mandatory Code of Practice that sets out the duty of pastoral care ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New trapping guide for community and expert trappers alike
    The Minister for Conservation Eugenie Sage has launched a new comprehensive trapping guide for community trappers to help them protect our native birds, plants and other wildlife, at Zealandia in Wellington today. ‘A practical guide to trapping’, has been developed by the Department of Conservation (DOC), and was launched during ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Widening Access to Contraceptives Welcomed
    Associate Health Minister Julie Anne Genter welcomes PHARMAC’s move to improve access to long-acting reversible contraception (LARCs). PHARMAC has today announced it will fund the full cost of Mirena and Jaydess for anyone seeking long term contraception, lifting previous restrictions on access to Mirena. “I welcome women having greater choices ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Major upgrade for Taranaki Base Hospital
    The Government has approved the next stage of a major redevelopment of Taranaki Base Hospital, which will deliver new and improved facilities for patients. Health Minister Dr David Clark has announced details of a $300 million dollar project to build a new East Wing at the New Plymouth hospital. It ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Extra support for rural families
    Extra funding will allow Rural Support Trusts to help farming families, says Minister for Rural Communities and Agriculture Damien O’Connor. “I know that rural families are worried about some of the challenges facing them, including the ongoing uncertainty created by the Mycoplasma bovis outbreak. “Those concerns sit alongside ongoing worries ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Howard Leaque Beekeeper programme graduation
    Thank you for the opportunity to be here to present certificates to the 16 graduates who have completed a beekeeping course delivered by the Howard League.  Let us start by acknowledging Auckland Prison’s Deputy Prison Director Tom Sherlock, and Acting Assistant Regional Commissioner of Corrections Northern Region Scott Walker - ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Finance Minister to attend APEC meetings
    Finance Minister Grant Robertson leaves this weekend to attend the APEC Finance Ministers meeting in Santiago, Chile. Discussions between APEC Finance Ministers at the meeting will include the effects of the current global economic uncertainty, risks for APEC economies and sustainable development of the region. While at APEC Grant Robertson ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pacific languages are a source of strength, they ground us and build confidence
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio says for Pacific people, language can be a source of strength. It can help ground us and give us confidence. When we speak them, our languages provide us with an immediate and intimate access to our identity and our story - and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Major boost to support disabled people in sport and recreation
    The Coalition Government has announced an action plan to improve the wellbeing of disabled New Zealanders by addressing inequalities in play, active recreation and sport. The initiative includes training to develop a workforce that understands the needs of children and young people with a range of impairments, advocacy for fit ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • More prefab homes to be built as red tape cut
    The construction sector is being freed up to allow more homes to be built more quickly as the Government cuts through some of the red tape of the Building Act.  “Every New Zealander deserves a warm, dry, safe home and old inefficiencies in the Building Act make building slow and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago