Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
6:00 am, April 8th, 2024 - 57 comments
Categories: open mike -
Tags:
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Finland is one of the few countries reducing homelessness. Reduced by 35% from 2008 to 2015.
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2023/rpt/pdf/2023-R-0109.pdf?fbclid=IwAR02WdRzR6QyNd09z6iXRwRI9ri-on2n3epigHddf_5dCqWxfoIRZ2D3wI8_aem_AUVtls91taZ_x_QNeG2qskNh4aeVEOpKQgVB4idEildYtKeiTS04TYLEL4z5Ia88FWXWFxbt8U4OukFYgyldmgKu
Shows what you can achieve with a laser focus on low tax, small government and deregulation!
No, wait…
It mainly shows that less income inequality makes for a happier country and everything else will flow from there (IMO)
Well, well, well–a gun lobbyist Act MP misleads the public on the semi-automatic weapon issue…Mrs McKee has talked up there being over 6600 people licensed to possess semis, whereas there are only 1593 allowed to possess the banned weapons–presumably mostly collectors–the Police say there are only around 328 pest controllers with permission to actually fire them.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/513682/firearms-minister-accused-of-misleading-public-on-gun-stats
It is rare for a Police Association President to criticise an individual MP, Mr Cahill said…
"Clearly she is using these figures to try and suggest that semi-automatic firearms are already widely available when they're not," he said.
"That goes to the heart of why I don't believe a gun lobbyist should be in charge of the firearms reform legislation or a review of the firearms registry."
Act–yes to lethal weapons in the community–no to school lunches!
A really encouraging stance against McKee from Police.
It is, a pleasant surprise.
Gutsy to call her out on this. Where is the opposition? What do we pay them for?
"Where is the opposition? "
Being studiously ignored by the MSM.
What is McKee trying to achieve? Does ACT want to loosen regs on gun control?
Pre-election McKee and ACT clearly stated gun reform as part of election policy and key to coalition talks.
The Police Association challenged ACT's figures even then.
Yes as per tWig’s link. Looks like the gun registry that Labour set up–an essential tool in tracking who has what–will be repealed.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/06/government-officially-establishes-gun-register-act-vows-to-repeal-it-if-elected.html
so is McKee's messaging saying there are so many already out there, we don't need to worry about that silly tracking now?
100% McKee wants to weaken gun regulations, she was well known in the gun lobby before becoming an act mp.
Scoop 2023
Newsroom 2020
I'm not especially anti gun (had my license for more than 30 years), but military style semi automatics aren't needed by 99% of hunters and I'm pleased to see them heavily restricted. I do a lot of hunting and know a lot of keen and skilled hunters… not one of them interested in using an mssa, and you never saw them even when legal. Of course they can be used, but only place they have a real benefit is in professional culling from helicopters, and our current laws already allow for that.
Had one fb friend batching about semis being banned I told him to shoot straight and he wouldn't need one , that got him going!!!
😂
Bob Mould is coming!
To get yr Husker/Sugar on.
Thurs 21st Nov, Loon, Chch.
Fri 22nd Nov, San Fran Wellies.
Sat 23rd Nov, Powerstation, Auck.
What was the name of the religious organisation Luxon belongs/belonged to; something about the Second Floor perhaps..?
The Upper Room.
Just like the Koru Lounge.
Ah, thanks, Ad.
Sounds like somewhere to sneak off to and swallow your ecstacy!
He's probably en(raptured) to be there.
My biggest beef with this so-called Christian church is the belief in the Prosperity Gospel.
https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/faq/prosperity-gospel#:~:text=The%20Prosperity%20Gospel%20(PG)%20is,through%20devotion%20and%20positive%20confession.
This is a religious off shoot of the type of person who blames poor people for being poor, 'bottom feeders' for short. Poor people or anyone not as rich as Croesus need 'bootstraps', 'short sharp shocks', time without money that 'we've' given them.
I looked up the ref to the phrase 'Rich as Croesus' and find how apt a description it is of PM Luxon. Croesus apart from being wealthy is also known for misinterpreting the words of the Oracle at Delphi. Sounds a bit like the Prosperity Church.
Ref as above from Harvard.
PS In the interests of balancing this sarcasm I did read that once he aspired to come to parliament he did not attend this 'church' regularly
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Luxon#:~:text=In%202021%20he%20said%20he,guides%20what%20they%20care%20about%22.
This is an interesting interview.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3907220382652374
Weasel words – The Upper Room isn't a church. He went there, for sure.
Thankfully there has been some really good work done by evangelicals to push back against prosperity teaching.
But I'm curious where you got the idea that this 'Upper Room' 'believes' in the Prosperity Gospel? I don't know much about the UR, but I've looked at both the NZ website (Welcome to The Upper Room | Church in Newmarket, Auckland – Our Story) and what appears to be the US equivalent (The Upper Room) and can't find anything about prosperity teaching. Genuine question because I know a family who visit there from time to time.
"Thankfully there has been some really good work done by evangelicals to push back against prosperity teaching."
Has there?
Where?
Some of the mainstream Christian publications have denounced it. But it's still massively popular along with the rise of Trump and "Christian" nationalism.
Prosperity Gospel | Topics | Christianity Today
Retributive theology opened the door to growth of the prosperity gospel today – Baptist News Global
"But it's still massively popular along with the rise of Trump and "Christian" nationalism."
Too true, unfortunately. It's part of that ancient problem about 'itching ears' (2 Timothy 4:3).
"Where?"
From where all heresy's must be fought and exposed – from within:
"Prosperity Gospel is a problematic issue for the Evangelical and Pentecostal Christianity, and it is so in at least two perspectives. First, it influences the teaching of many preachers who employ this approach to capture new believers on the one hand, and it is sharply criticised by many prominent Evangelical theologians who regard it as a serious heresy, a deception of many Christians, on the other."
(PDF) The Prosperity Gospel: A Distortion of the Fundamental Evangelical Tenets (researchgate.net)
The Gospel Coalition: The Prosperity Gospel: How It Can Mislead and Harm (thegospelcoalition.org)
John Piper: Six Keys to Detecting the Prosperity Gospel | Desiring God
Centre for Faith & Culture: 5 Critical Errors of the Prosperity Gospel – Christ and Culture (sebts.edu)
Ligonier: What Is the Prosperity Gospel? (ligonier.org)
Christianity Today Prosperity Gospel | Topics | Christianity Today
Institute for Faith Work & Economics What Is the Prosperity Gospel? (tifwe.org)
Thanks. Good news. Good luck.
They cleansed their sermons from their website some time ago when people started drawing attention to them. Apparently they were a bit odd. They also used to promote Rise Church as well on their webpage.
https://twitter.com/publicaddress/status/1191501840489148416
The Twitter link isn't that convincing – it references a single sermon. However if they've purged sermon history, that's a whole different level altogether.
Good to see that the Scottish "Hate Crime" Law is being recognised for the nonsense that it is.
"Those who support the new act have frequently, over the past week, sought to paint its critics as bigots, as if those of us who see flaws in the legislation are driven by fear we won’t be able to stir up hatred against anyone (except, maybe, women). This cheap attack shouldn’t be allowed to cloud the truth which is that the Hate Crime Act is a flawed law, its creation damaged by the influence of campaigners and the weakness of the former First Minister.
All of us – including both gender critical feminists and trans rights activists – should oppose a law so clearly open to abuse that it'll be impossible to uphold."
https://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/columnists/euan-mccolm-hate-crime-act-damaged-from-the-start-by-influence-of-campaigners-and-weakness-of-nicola-sturgeon-4581976
The intention of laws like this is to stifle dissent by those in power, to be used against those not in power, as well as to control the people. It has nothing to do with suppression of hate speech, but labelling as such makes it easier to justify these laws.
Jonathan Pie embarked on one of his sweary rants about this chilling legislation, which makes comedy and acting a risky enterprise in the tartan police state. He capped it off with a joke that's probably offensive to your Scottish granny, but pretty hilarious
"Nobody expects the Scottish Inquisition" is hell-funny!
Oh Robert – was it funny for you haha
Ha!
"A summary of legal advice sought by the housing agency and released to Stuff under the Official Information Act shows that Kāinga Ora’s Māori-first name is its legal name and it’s entrenched in its establishing legislation, the Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities Act 2019.
The advice says that this is in contrast to many other Crown entities, whose establishing legislation only contains an English name.
“There is nothing preventing Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities from using a ‘trading name’ to refer to itself in general communications (as some other Crown entities do), but it must use its legal name in formal documents such as contracts,” the advice says."
https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350236750/how-governments-push-english-first-names-tracking
The Atlas Network conspiracy theory is getting really crazy now. People are now claiming that the FSU is part of Atlas despite people like Matt McCarten being involved. I didn't realise Matt McCarten was so easily turned.
Where are your link(s) to substantiate your two claims:
Its a lot easier to prove the conspiracy, 10 minutes reading the face book posts of Gerard Otto.
Not sure how to share from his page but this is part of a post from March 11, and if you follow there are lots of pictures .
This article is a summary of how embedded the influence of the two Atlas Network think tanks are in New Zealand's current government.
A useful roadmap is to scan through the front bench portfolios of the Cabinet and point out links – but there's also policy itself and where it came from and who it serves.
Plus who serves it up on a plate for consumption.
Notably Fran O'Sullivan "Went Swiss" with the NZ Initiative in May 2017 when she enjoyed a one week jolly with 39 others, mostly CEs of NZ Initiative member companies and this morning Fran has written a glowing endorsement for both David Seymour and Christopher Luxon's cabinet in the NZ Herald – mostly about opening up New Zealand for foreign investors.
"As the New Zealand Initiative has pointed out, other developed economies like France, the United Kingdom and Ireland do not even have laws with “character and competence” and “sensitive lands” requirements like our foreign investment regime." – wrote Fran before adding :
"As an Associate Finance Minister, Seymour has delegated authority in this area. Along with Cabinet minister Paul Goldsmith, he has ultimate sign-off on offshore applications to either buy existing businesses or establish greenfield ventures here."
Fran also speaks about how this neatly dovetails with fast track consenting – where Te Tiriti had been shoved aside as this Government decides it knows best and side steps the Environment Court – so it can crack on with making money for it's membership's vested interests.
The slogan "getting things done" equates to "making money for my mates" if you take a look at the kind of things getting done or getting "undone".
As you know Seymour is an Atlas Network alumni and denied Act was in any way linked to the Atlas Network to Mihingirangi Forbes on 7 February 2024.
That was proven to be a lie in may ways since – including ( but not limited to ) by the fact that Act's Vice President ( former President ) Catherine Isaac is an Honorary Member of the NZ Initiative ( Atlas Network ). Then there's Act's founder Roger Douglas ( 1993 ) and Ruth Richardson ( Ruthanasia ) both members of the Mont Pelerin society and advocates for Act. Roger Douglas recently dissed Act – but only because it was not being radical enough according to Seymour.
In 2008 Alan Gibbs donated $200K to Act and $100K in 2011, $32,000 in 2015, $100,700 from Jenny Gibbs in 2020 – and as you know – his daughter Debbi is Chair of the Atlas Network.
Alan Gibbs set up an Atlas Network think tank The Centre of Independent Studies ( there's three around the world ) and made a fortune from flicking Telecom with David Richwhite ( another honorary member of the NZ Initiative ) out of Rogernomics.
Recently Lord Hannan broke the news at the Gibbs Farm that Jordan "
Sorry if not allowed but its been very interesting to follow his well researched and backed up posts.
The FSU was set up by Jordan Williams in July 2018.. that's the same Jordan Williams that founded the TPU.. and the same Jordan Williams that has received funds from Atlas and I believe has been to workshops tun by the atlas network. In fact, if you go to the atlas network web page you'll find this article..
https://www.atlasnetwork.org/articles/smith-fellow-spotlight-jordan-williams
That Matt McCarten is involved at some small level should be of no consequence to their over all alignment with Atlas.
Also, there is no "conspiracy" regarding the atlas network, their purpose and intentions are well published as are their networks and members. They are quite open on their website what those intentions are, and they publish a yearly and quarterly report that covers off many of what they consider achievements.
Soy-fact:
85% of soy grown is fed to animals..that humans then eat..
Soy grown for plant-based consumption is not the environmental-villain many carnivores claim…
[TheStandard: A moderator moved this comment to Open Mike as being off topic or irrelevant in the post it was made in. Be more careful in future.]
My meat isn't fed soy, so you are comparing the wrong things. Also, soy grown for humans has all the issues I outlined to Robert above.
So…because your 'ethical' meat hasn't been fed soy..that makes what I said about 85% of soy fed to animals bullshit..?
And you just double down on that false narrative..?
And are you just ignoring the environmental impact from farming animals..?..
You talk of mono-cultures…when animal farming has well and truly screwed over our environment..
Do the ‘ethical’ones not do that..?
[don’t grandstand under my posts. If you don’t want to engage with what people are saying, then take it to OM. Don’t extrapolate out from what people are saying so you can then project your own arguments onto other people – weka]
mod note.
This cartoon (at least 5 years old) put the hoofprint of civilisation's animals on shapeship Earth in perspective for me.
Everyone has to eat (apart from 'exceptional' humans who claim to live on light – a bit like plants), and most NZers can do better, imho.
The biomass of domestic cattle is close to seven times that of all wild mammals combined.
In order to put the total biomass of wild terrestrial and marine mammals (≈22 Mt and ≈39 Mt, respectively) in perspective, we compared them to domesticated mammals (Fig. 4). Many domesticated mammal species outweigh the top wild mammal biomass contributors by 10 to 1,000 fold (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). The most significant mammal biomass contributors are cattle (≈420 Mt), humans (≈390 Mt), and other livestock species most commonly reared for meat or dairy (including buffaloes, pigs, sheep, and goats). These are followed by pack animals (e.g., horses, camels, and donkeys). Domesticated pigs alone weigh ≈40 Mt, almost double the combined mass of all terrestrial wild mammals.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FuPv4QdXgAEr_1T?format=jpg&name=4096×4096
https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2204892120
Thanks joe90 for that more up-to-date information.
Chrs to you both…for the relevant info..
Mammals are a tiny % of global carbon biomass
And a single species belonging to that "timy %" is punching unnaturally above its weight vis–à–vis ecosystem collapse and mass extinction. Our huge collective brain power has identified causes and solutions – it's only the effective implementation of those solutions at scale that has us stumped.
Homo sapiens won't be extinguished for ages, but Kiwis may have to make do with fewer epic sporting wins such as the White Ferns' triumph over England in Hamiltron ("City of the Future!") last Sunday.
We could have had it all…
How exactly am I grandstanding..?
And how am I not ' engaging'..when I am replying to three things you said..
And I'm sorry..but I am unable to comprehend what you are saying in yr final sentence..do you have an example of that..?
And am I allowed to ask you to define 'ethical' dairy/meat..and there also I am replying to you..as you have been promoting this..and mentioned it first..
Meat remains murder–how ever much people like to be in denial when they get it in plastic trays or already cooked from where ever. I predict many more vegetarians if people had to kill and butcher their own meat supplies.
The Far North where I live has a number of small outfits that advertise “Home Kills” which does sound a bit like murder eh…they roam around in vehicles with high winches and various slicing and dicing tools, despatching various types of farm animals, and then gutting and butchering them on site.
Plant based remains a better option for all of us.
The "home kill" thing is hideous, isn't it!
Then there's tailing. I see some progress toward using anaesthetic, but still, it's appalling to think a removal is needed, as it's just correcting a situation we've caused (extra wool on animals that should be in drier parts of the world, eating rougher stuff). Tail-docking on cows, likewise appalling, to me. Hammering bobby-calves, castrating willy-nilly – the fun never ends!
I don't like it at all.
I favour plants as food also.
How long have you been vegan?
Heh, that ranks up there with the classic courtroom question “when did you stop beating your wife?”
Not that it is anyone on The Standards business, I have been vegetarian most of my adult life, not an easy achievement in early days as an industrial worker, and do not have dairy products these days apart from a little cheese.
I say plant based is better for all of us in a general sense–land use, less waterway pollution, less animal cruelty and exploitation, better health for people.
Nice answer. Well done, you.
We need more plants.
Big ones, especially.
That's all.
How so?
No-one here is under any obligation to answer a personal question. It's perfectly fine to ask. In this case because you are making a political argument that everyone should be vegan for climate, environment, health and animal welfare reasons. If you didn't want to answer, then just don't.
I'm glad you answered the question however, because vegetarian is not vegan, and in health terms that difference is significant. I would encourage you to listen to the voices of former vegans who had serious health problems, especially women, where those health problems often resolved when they stopped being vegan.
We also know that there are no vegan cultures historically. One of the reasons for that is because it's hard to maintain health on a vegan diet without industrial society especially across generations. Again, I would reference the numbers of women who have been vegan and had their health deteriorate after some years and then improve on eating animals again.
Menstruation, pregnancy, lactation are all quite hard on women's bodies and much harder when not getting adequate nutrients.
(and no, for those about to make the argument, it's not about badly done vegan diets, there's a whole subset of ex-vegans who were health freaks and paid a lot of attention to nutrient intake).
It appears there is are a small number of humans can be vegan over long periods of time. It doesn't look to me like it's something that most or many can sustain.
"It appears there is are a small number of humans can be vegan over long periods of time. It doesn't look to me like it's something that most or many can sustain. "
Weka I can easily make the argument going the other way :
How much longer can we sustain a meat diet growing towards 10 billion people on this planet?
And all the health implication on a personal level (diabetes, obesity) and globally with all the outbreaks we have had this far (including Covid 19).
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/20/factory-farms-pandemic-risk-covid-animal-human-health
Farmageddon: The True Cost of Cheap Meat
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jan/20/hidden-lives-the-animals-behind-the-products-we-consume-photo-essay?