Written By:
mickysavage - Date published:
3:03 pm, September 4th, 2017 - 43 comments
Categories: election 2017, grant robertson, labour, national, Politics, same old national, Steven Joyce, the praiseworthy and the pitiful, you couldn't make this shit up -
Tags:
Steven Joyce has burst into print and claimed that Labour has a $11.7 billion dollar hole in its budget figures.
There are five different problems claimed. Four of them involve relatively small figures and have been explained by Grant Robertson.
The biggest one ($9.4 billion) is that Labour has allegedly no allowed for the ongoing effect of new spending in areas like police wages where an increase in numbers is planned for. If you employ more police then that expense will be ongoing and you should also incorporate likely increases in police wages in subsequent years.
To achieve this rather startling result he has interpreted the phrase “operational allowance” as including all future increases in these expenses. To properly account for the ongoing expenses of a policy change the figures should be cumulative and will go up each year.
But as explained by Grant Robertson, Joyce has, wilfully or otherwise, misunderstood the figures.
Here are the relevant figures from a table in Labour’s fiscal plan. Note healthy annual increases in Social security, Health and education each year.
…
If Joyce was correct the figures should be stationary apart from general inflation.
The whole plan has been reviewed by BERL and given the tick of approval.
But I can understand Joyce’s difficulties with the figures because I have discovered a copy of his academic transcript. Let’s just say economics is not a strength of his.
But don’t trust me on the matter …
https://twitter.com/keith_ng/status/904523858878668801
https://twitter.com/keith_ng/status/904529938476294144
https://twitter.com/keith_ng/status/904536135988162560
That's not the debate, really, though, is it? Because Joyce is claiming it's not about accounting practice but glaring errors.
— Ben Uffindell (@BenUffindell) September 4, 2017
https://twitter.com/keith_ng/status/904537357323341824
https://twitter.com/keith_ng/status/904536843613462528
Update:
I understand the answer is in the bottom line of this table also from the fiscal plan. It looks like for each policy there is an increasing yearly spend.
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Tactical he dropped this before to nights debate, simple simon, bill will be geared up for a big hit.-careful Jacinda.
Curious they’d want to go all accounting and numbers in the debate when clearly the public want to see vision, so to speak.
Hopefully she will remind people about English’s 18 taxes as Finance Minister
Media picked it up and ran scary headlines…
Hopefully she reminds everyone at the debate that English oversaw 18 new or raised taxes
Phew, with that level of intelligence it’s just as well he doesn’t make important decisions.
I’m not sure doxxing someone with their academic transcript is very kind. I was getting similar results myself at the same time. In my defence, I was pretty much stoned to bits, but maybe he was too.
Its public info. Was tabled in Parliament by Joyce a few years ago.
Ah, fair enough. I just have a lot of sympathy for those that trip over themselves in their late adolescence. A bit of a shabby love affair, getting sick and recreational activities can all get in the way.
Agreed!
Bit weird because his bio on wikipedia suggests he did zoology. Maybe that was later.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Joyce
Yep he did get a degree in zoology, conferred some 18 years after he completed it. He’s an expert in the study of animal behaviour. Economics? Not so much. 🙂
http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/comment/3498001/Sporting-Joyce-proves-the-value-of-his-time-spent-studying-animal-behaviour
The Transcript is for a Dip Soc Sc.
remember two pages of the transcript are missing from that released by Joyce.
maybe the BSc ( Zoology) is there
He started with a veterinary degree in 1981, clearly didnt complete that, so maybe that morphed in the BSc in Zoology
other subjects studied
Introduction to Computing: C
I am not sure even what my first two papers result were but certainly fails. However I am not the Minister of Finance. I don’t think.
Hang on I’ll ask my wife.
What did she say?
I know what my wife would say – considering she took management of the household finances off me some time back!
And we’re better off because of it!
Nact are desperate
The Dirty Tricks employed by Joyce is that he can make those outrageous claims to support the Nat accusation that Labour are poor managers of the Economy. This is supposed to resonate in the minds of the voters and as a sound bite it will.
By the time Robertson explains the error that Joyce made, the damage is done.
Unless MSM highlights it.
Fancy that! Herald has a robust rebuttal of Joyce’s criticism.
And it is written by Wow! Tracey Watkins! Is that worm turning?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11916799
Shows how low “journalism” has sunk. The story here is that Joyce told lies. Instead, it’s presented as a “he said, he said” story.
The story you linked to is by Clare Trevett. If she’s incapable of doing the necessary sums that show Joyce lied perhaps she knows someone who can use a calculator.
No that worms not turning just woken up to the new day dawning so hedging bets for cover.
Its a typically lightweight piece where a real journalist would punish joyce over his deliberate DP play and rightly question his ability as finance minister.
Hasn’t National promised a new hospital for Dunedin but left out budget numbers because it wil be funded through a public/private partnership? They have apparently left in current operating costs, but a PPP will cost ongoing interest/lease costs which will be more expensive than funding through government debt.
And other flagrant breaches of electoral law …..you do a budget then you campaign. National yet again behave as if rules are guidelines that can be ignored.
This lie from Joyce creates a headline that leave Labour explaining and explaining is losing. I am guessing that is Joyce’s strategy and god knows they are well practiced in that art of deception.
This is this elections 100k bottle wine lie from National.
Having said that they’ve over egged the pudding rather massively on this occasion though.
Joyce is unfit for public office
This will probably be part of some set up for tonight’s debate looking for a gotcha moment like key got cunliffe with. Some obscure question about a fine point of labours tax package.
Gower was warned to support the hand that feeds him.
Remember that gift Gerry sent him – it was an unsubtle threat.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/national-video/news/video.cfm?c_id=1503075&gal_cid=1503075&gallery_id=179787
So has Joyce deliberately pulled the rug out from under English before the debate by letting the cat out of the bag and pre-warning Labour of tonight’s zinger.
Wants to be the leader after the fall he does.
Weird isn’t it? They’ve totally telegraphed the strategy for tonight, namely inward looking accountancy gotcha moments.
Hopefully Jacinda’s team can come up with something which shows this Nat angle for what it is – desperate.
Maybe they felt the need to move the news cycle on quickly from Bennett’s own goal over lesser human rights for gang members?
is simply fake news and will have the desired effect…most will not seek any follow up info….hopefuly JA will use tonights platform to highlight Nationals dishonesty and incompetence on this claim.
BERL’s statement is worth reading (don’t know how to link it). They say “the numbers add up”.
Game over Joyce-if BERL is so adamant you have it wrong then you just gifted the election to the Labour/Green bloc.
RNZ ran a news item just after 7PM where I lost track of people saying Joyce had it wrong.
it will require widespread MSM coverage of that fact to undo the initial impression created by Joyces statement…as he is well aware
National wheel this BS out every time.
Every election I meant.
That transcript is an example of why a strong public service, with people actually qualified in their fields, should have a solid part in running things – not just politicians and “business people” who often act solely in their own interests more than anything else.
excellent summation by Bernard Hickey at Newsroom…..and note he thinks an independent budget analysis arm is needed….oddly National don’t…I wonder why?
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2017/09/04/46047/election2017-fiscalhole-tmo
It was just a matter of time and entirely predictable that National would come up with variations on the theme “show me the money”. This and the fearmongering about Labour’s “secret tax plan” are aimed at seeding doubt & fear in the minds of the voters.
Nope. Wrong.
You’re arguing that they’ve just conflated operating costs into portfolio monies, and therefore nothing is amiss.
But thats the whole point. Of course the portfolio spending will go up. But they simply haven’t assigned spending into operating costs, that also isn’t covered in the portfolio line items.
I’m not going to say anything mocking etc. But this is really serious. The whole point is that there is a shortfall. These numbers do not , and cannot add up.
Well , there was Brash having mud thrown at him , then Key gets the boo treatment at the Big Gay Out , then of course we have the the dildo Joyce episode , but the latest one of N.Smith is equally as classic …
What is it with National that seems to attracts such things , we may ask….
Nick Smith squatting sculpture to go on the road: RNZ … – YouTube
you tube▶ 3:40
The boring old bastard called Bill
Has suddenly become much more shrill
He squawked, “There’s a hole
In your big money bowl
So you’re short of a lot – say nine bill
But Jacinda retorted, “Not so,
If you can’t see the numbers below,
Look on top of the line
You’ll discover the nine
Real accountants can see, why can’t you?”