Three strikes and you’re garrotted

Written By: - Date published: 12:10 pm, March 23rd, 2009 - 16 comments
Categories: act, humour, law and "order", national/act government - Tags:

The Toad’s ‘interview’ with ACT’s David Garrett is so good we had to steal it. Like all good parody, it’s easy to believe it could be real.

An interview with ACT Party Law and Order spokesperson David Garrotte

garrotted1

Toad: David, for many people, you first came to public attention when you appeared drunk on Eye to Eye.

Garrotte: Yeah, I was pretty pissed. I’d been on it all afternoon.

Toad: And you equated homosexuals with paedophiles on Eye to Eye. Are you homophobic?

Garrotte: Hell, no! I just don’t like poofters – or any other perverts or deviants for that matter.

Pages: 1 2

16 comments on “Three strikes and you’re garrotted ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. volnay 1
    23 March 2009 at 12:50 pm

    Is this for real?

  2. John Dalley 2
    23 March 2009 at 1:42 pm

    You are taking the Piss, aren’t you?

  3. bobo 3
    23 March 2009 at 2:03 pm

    Sounds if this is real, he was drunk again..

  4. bill brown 4
    23 March 2009 at 2:19 pm

    What part of “parody” do you not understand?

  5. Ianmac 5
    23 March 2009 at 2:32 pm

    Just go to show what happens when you don’t notice that you are being taped.

  6. BLiP 6
    23 March 2009 at 2:44 pm

    How is it possible that this man garnered an income working in the field of Justice?

    An oik! Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

  7. Kevin Welsh 7
    23 March 2009 at 2:51 pm

    I am so looking forward to this clown having a “Jeff Gannon” moment sometime in the next 2.5 years.

  8. toad 8
    23 March 2009 at 4:42 pm

    Thanks for the compliment Eddie.

    Has anyone else noticed the physical resmblance between Garrett and Enoch Powell of “Rivers of Blood” notoriety?

  9. Rex Widerstrom 9
    23 March 2009 at 4:59 pm

    A beautifully pitched parody. One could well imagine these “restrained” answers being given whilst Garrett clearly bristled with what he trulywanted to say.

    Meanwhile DPF notes that Blaise Drinkwater notes Antonin Scalia’s comment on the Bill of Rights: that some rights are important and some aren’t (!!) but that “they were selected on the basis of, “what rights would a tyrant want to move against?'”.

    Given Garrett and the SST want to dilute or dispose of rights protected in the US, from double jeopardy and silence to protection from “cruel and unusual punishment” – and given that National seem unconcerned about the impact of letting them have their way – then I wonder how Key takes to being described as a tyrant by a notoriously conservative US Justice? 😈

  10. Whacky Lefty 10
    24 March 2009 at 10:20 am

    Are white people still exempt?

    I’ld really like someone to clarify the SST & ACT on when white/Asian people kill it doesn’t hurt so should get a medal?

    [lprent: Just been looking at your comments. You look like a troll in your various guises. Adding you to auto-moderation because you also look like someone we have banned]

    • Whacky Lefty 10.1
      25 March 2009 at 12:37 am

      To clarify, it’s troll like to ask questions of the seeming racial imbalance of causes the SST & ACT champion or dismiss?

      Well I say no it isn’t. It is a serious question worthy of consideration. (Possibly not express well in the first instance).

      A brown boy is stabbed to death by a white male and Garth calls for Home detention (& I seem to hear others call for a medal for him).

      I’m not against Home Detention, infact probbly a very good sentence as I don’t suspect he is generally a danger to other and with suitable programmes will rehabilitate well back into society. The support of a family is a positive factor in this.

      This should also be open to the majority of prisoners behind bars today.

      I await your apology in regards to your slur upon my person.

      [lprent: Sure looks like trollish to me. Specifically a wingnut trying to look like a moonbat]

  11. lyndon 11
    24 March 2009 at 3:13 pm

    I put this just on my blog recently – which is a good place for things I don’t want people to see – but I thought you might appreciate it:

    Separated at birth?

  12. mike 12
    24 March 2009 at 4:40 pm

    Hey – this is geat – finally a sensible person in government.

    He should be prime minister.

  13. toad 13
    24 March 2009 at 10:38 pm

    Ah Lyndon, brilliant!

    Not only does he look like Powell, but like Mosely as well.

    An extraordianry coincidence, Sorry, but don’t think we can find the Franco or Hitler or Mussolini likenesses to Garrett anywhere though.

    But if the cap fits…

  14. BLiP 14
    25 March 2009 at 10:29 am

    I reckon he most closely resembles Alf Garnett – showing my age, I guess.

  15. alice 15
    11 April 2009 at 12:09 am

    i used ta have a teacher with your name haha

The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.