Written By:
weka - Date published:
1:50 pm, August 17th, 2016 - 18 comments
Categories: christchurch earthquake, Conservation, Environment, sustainability, water -
Tags: christchurch, documentary, red zone, resiliency, tangata whenau, water
Ko au te wai ko te wai te au
I am the water, the water is me
Christchurch Dilemmas is a rolling series of documentaries about issues facing Christchurch five years on. Made by independent, award-winning filmmaker Gerard Smyth with backing from NZ On Air and RNZ, the first series asks what to do about the Red Zone, the 440 ha/18 km stretch of land cleared after the quakes that can’t be built on. It presents five short (2 – 4 min) videos on proposals for the area that flows around the Avon/Ōtākaro River in Central and Eastern Christchurch.
“The best return on the land would be to return it to the people”
Regenerate is a council, central government and iwi represented organisation set up to replace CERA, and is tasked with consulting the local communities on what to do with the Red Zone land. Ultimately the decision remains with a Crown-owned company and the government is expecting some financial return. Leaving aside the extent to which the people will have an actual say (and the politics involved), the projects presented here are inspiring examples of what NZ is really capable of, given the chance.
Despite the incessant pressure from the neoliberal revolution to commercialise all aspects of life, New Zealanders are still at heart people of the place they belong to, and it’s encouraging to see this rising again in places where life has been stripped bare to make obvious what is really important. Given the opportunity, people care for the land they live in. We still have this. It’s not too late.
In the past few years I have been hearing from Christchurch friends about the re-emerging landscape in the Red Zone, where nature is asserting itself and reminding the people that we are part of the natural world. Wild spaces for kids to play in, foraging, people spontaneously replanting the commons. So it was a pleasure to see the low aerial footage showing large areas where the removal of the built landscape has created a negative space waiting amongst the trees that miraculously survived the demolitions, and then to see all five proposals focused on nature.
The film project is also intended as an invitation to join the conversation. Amongst all the trauma of the quakes and of the government response, one of the more encouraging things to emerge has been the voices of Christchurch people with a sense of place. This comes through in the videos and website too, with long time residents, young kids from the Red Zone, and Tangata Whenua all speaking.
“There’s lots of places to build houses in Christchurch, let’s do something else with it”
“The river is starting to tell us what it wants to do. It’s regenerating in a really unique and special way”.
In a time when NZ has spent decades watching our waterways being destroyed and are only now just starting to stand up to fight that, these stories are clear beacons of what we can do next.
Here are the five videos,
The Introduction video.
“Communities are already taking ownership”
“In terms of the Red Zone we have to stop thinking of just the land… it’s the land and the water… if we think from that perspective the people are going to prosper”.
Ngāi Tuāhuriri are the hapū of the area and talk in this video about one of the central wetland catchments in the Red Zone, its historical place as a food basket between the Ōtākaro and Heathcote Rivers and the potential for restoration. ‘Mahi nga kai’ means ‘work the food’, and represents a complex set of values, understandings and cultural practices around resources use, and includes being fed in its broadest sense), . Much of this project is already under way.
East Lake is a proposed recreation reserve, with an artesian-fed lake separate from the river. It is focussed on water sports, both professional and recreational, with recreation beyond traditional sports e.g. family barbecues and swimming. It aims for high water quality (so above ‘wadeable’) and would also include the surrounding land for things like walking tracks. It intends to connect in with the other projects.
“I would love to see something that is here that celebrates the role that water has to play in our lives and how important that is to us”
A NZ version of the Eden Project. My least favourite project because of its inherent commercial focus and high cost (too Think Big), the likelihood that locals will have to pay for access and because eco-tourism is an oxymoron and hugely problematic in terms of climate change. Building large infrastructure and buildings in the Red Zone seems unwise.
“It’s for the people of the city”
“Nature can so some of this itself if we let it”
Encompassing an area that starts in the CBD, the forest park would run along the river corridor all the way to Brighton. It would provide space for walking, biking, picnicking, camping, being in nature, and would support the emerging landscape that is already recovering from its farming past. An ecological anchor project, very low cost, that would work with existing native trees and current regeneration from seedlings. Established exotics trees would be protected as part of the reality of an urban forest.
Christchurch is the largest city in NZ without an eco-sanctuary. A predator-proof 7km fence surrounding an area that includes Travis Wetland and part of the Red Zone. A wildlife bridge that spans the highway would join the two areas to increase viability of wildlife populations – kiwi, weka, takahe, robins, tomtits, saddlebacks, kaka, kakariki, whio, fern birds, as well as insects and lizards that would also spread out and colonise the rest of the restored Red Zone and beyond.
I don’t know how these five projects were chosen, and there are some obvious gaps. I would like to see all projects audited through a climate change mitigation and preparation filter. There’s been support for years to create food growing, urban farming and foraging corridors within the Red Zone. I also wonder what’s happened to the low income communities from the Eastern Suburbs that were largely ignored in the quake aftermath. Are their voices being heard here or are the people with resources dominating the conversation? Where are the regeneration plans that are socially inclusive?
But the projects here nevertheless present a kind of hope, that while the world falls apart people are increasingly willing to do some of the right things. We are a nation of gardeners, and it’s fitting that Christchurch finds new ways to reinvent and restore itself as the Garden City.
Great post weka,
Still not hearing much from the Eastern Suburbs – would be good to hear what they think.
The perfect Commons to Grow 🙂
Yes!
Check this out from the CCC,
An Edible Park is Council land, where edible plants are grown, cared for and enjoyed by the community in a way that complements the other uses of the park. Often fruit or nut trees are dotted around the park, along borders, pathways or in clusters to add diversity and amenity for park users. Plants can be harvested by anyone, but the plants must be cared for over time by the surrounding community. This is different to a community garden because the land is not formally occupied by a particular community group. It is simply a park that incorporates edible plants in its landscape.
Many parks in Christchurch can become Edible Parks. If you would like to grow and care for edible trees on a Council park near you, contact your local Council community advisor.
http://www.ccc.govt.nz/environment/edible-christchurch/food-foraging-and-edible-parks/
I like these people too,
https://www.facebook.com/plantgang/posts/989573611091790
https://www.facebook.com/plantgang/photos/?tab=album&album_id=945242218858263
“Made by independent, award-winning filmmaker Gerard Smith”
Actually it’s Smyth.
Thanks Lanth, fixed now.
I live in the east, just outside the cbd but grew up aranui/new Brighton. Not only is the east completely forgotten by decision makers (Brownlee has been particularly spiteful) including utter failure Liane Dalziel. Eastern Chch had a great mix of people now it’s a ghetto. All the businesses are struggling because six years basic infrastructure still hasn’t been restored walk anywhere soon you’ll see shops, houses, roads which have been left in the exact state they were in post quake. Decile one schools being merged into super schools with hundred students to a teacher cos they’ve give up. People outside of the east won’t come because the roads are munted and will damage there car, nothing to do once you get here and many people jus don’t feel safe violence has gone majorly up. International Visitors think it’s the slums, it’s the only area in the city without roofed bus stops. When people say the rebuild is nearly I think are you out of your mind? It has barely begun.
Fuck. I have a feeling that might be the case. And interesting that I didn’t really know. Who talks about this?
Go take a look, weka. I went there last year, at the invitation of some locals and was amazed by the formality. Let’s get informal, shall we?
Formality in the Eastern Suburbs?
Any chance you could post a few or lots of photos of your area here cynicaljester ?
Cynicaljester is 100% correct
It is shameful
and frightening
Swarm through the Red Zone, planting like there’s no tomorrow.
I like the Mahinga Kai and Avon-Ōtākaro Forest Park ideas best. Both are about restoring the ecology of the area and creating a healthier environment for everyone.
Least favourite is creating the man made lake. The biggest beneficiaries of that are those who are competitive rowers/kayakers/canoers, many recreationalists would be happy to paddle the river instead. I don’t see families going down to a sports lake for a swim, its more fun just to go in the river if it’s clean enough. Then there’s the cost which is probably going to be tens of millions.
I also wonder what the excavation of the land would be, will it survive another quake and liquifaction, and whether they’d be chopping down the trees that survived.
I do think families would use it though, I’m guessing they will provide facilities eg boat hire, that will bring people in.
The low impact, restorative projects were my favourites too. Urban farms where locals set up ways of making a living would have been good too.
It looks like the food growing is still on the cards according to this group. Check out the map (scroll down).
http://www.avonotakaronetwork.co.nz/blog/post/Avon-Otakaro-Networks-SYLVIA-SMYTH-and-EVAN-SMITH-say-the-red-zone-is-big-enough-to-host-many-complementary-visions-for-its-future
Is there still grass growing in the Red Zone? Lawn grass? Why?
I’m guessing that some of it has been kept in a park like state, and that they also did a big clean up in the lead up to the big plan. I heard that there were lots of good foraging places for a long time and then they started spraying (maybe last year?). Crazy but compatible with the culture I guess. And ‘easier’ to do something with the land if you keep it clear depending on what you intend. I like the negative space amongst the trees but it’s bizarre that this far on those spaces even exist.
Empty spaces will fill. It’s the seed sources that dictate the makeup of the regrowth. Thoughtful regenerators will supply seeds if there’s no natural supply. Squirrels bury nuts, many of which grow into nut bearing trees. Squirrel away, Cantabrians!