Sweden has had a smacking ban for 30 years. How is that working out?
Stockholm When celebrating the 30th anniversary of the world’s first national ban on corporal punishment of children last month, Sweden’s social affairs minister, GÃ¶ran HÃ¤gglund, claimed a dramatic success over something many Swedes now consider a scourge. “Colleagues from other countries often ask how we manage to raise children here without hitting them, but it works,” he said. “Many countries have followed our model but we still have a way to go.”
Sweden was the first of 24 countries to introduce a ban on smacking children in 1979. At the time traditionalists said it would lead to unruly kids, and other critics say the ban would be largely unenforceable. But according to official figures, just 10 percent of Swedish children are spanked or otherwise struck by their parents today. More than 90 percent of Swedish children were smacked prior to the ban.
The law places a legal obligation on teachers, day care workers, and health care professionals to report any suspicion of abuse. This has led to a surge in the number of reported cases, yet the proportion of serious cases of abuse has decreased. “When there is this moral standpoint that you should not use any violence against children, it influences the more severe kinds of violence,” says Children’s Ombudsman Fredrik Malmberg
New Zealand gets the kind of (poorly reported) mention we could really have done without:
It is held up as a model by child rights campaigners lobbying for wider adoption of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, on which the Swedish law is based. The campaign experienced a setback last month when New Zealanders voted to repeal their anti-smacking law in a hotly contested referendum.
Depressingly, after 30 years, the opposition doesn’t seem to have gone away:
Polls show the ban has near universal support in Sweden. However there is a vocal international movement against the Swedish model. “In Sweden parents are afraid of their children. They don’t dare to correct them for fear of being reported,” says Ruby Harrold-Claesson, chairperson of the Nordic Committee for Human Rights, a Scandinavian-based lobby group fighting for the repeal of anti-smacking laws.
I guess we too can look forward to 30 years of Section 59 debate…