A government looking at the climate challenges, not with fear but with hope

Written By: - Date published: 6:10 am, July 9th, 2023 - 69 comments
Categories: election 2023, greens, james shaw - Tags:

James Shaw, co-leader of the Green Party, gave a speech at the party’s AGM yesterday. Text of speech is here, video is embedded below.

There’s this hangover from our old First Past the Post electoral system that you have to be the government to effect serious change. Following from that is the MMP era idea that smaller parties get some concessions but really don’t have that much influence unless they are centrist tails that can wag the dog.

In this speech Shaw points a number of times to the gains the Greens have made in the past two terms. He names the Greens as “the only political party to treat climate change as the crisis it truly is”, and later says that what they have delivered in the past six years, given the governments they had to work with, has been remarkable.

This might sound like hyperbole, but it’s not. Consider the Zero Carbon Act, introduced in 2019 as an amendment to the 2002 Climate Change Response Act, Shaw describes its intent and import, starting with coming into government after the 2017 election,

Six years ago, we pulled together to get the party through the most traumatic election campaign we have had.

An election that took us to the brink – but that also took us into Government, with ministers, for the first time in our history.

We immediately got to work on what would quickly become the largest government programme of work to cut emissions this country has ever seen.

Creating a single framework, that would require every single future government to take action to cut emissions, was the job of the Zero Carbon Act – which we passed.

Amongst other things, the Zero Carbon Act requires Governments to have binding plans to cut emissions and to adapt to the coming floods and storms.

Let’s take that in for a moment. It’s the legislation that binds future governments to act on climate and both mitigate and adapt.

We’re not doing enough. Shaw himself says this, frequently. Someone pointed out yesterday that in his State of the Planet speech in February, Shaw said he was frustrated 8 times. He gets it. But us not doing enough isn’t the same as nothing good being achieved, and rather than rearranging deck chairs while the NZ First tail and then the majority Labour government dragged the chain, the Greens got on with setting up the frameworks for turning the Titanic around.

Shaw goes on to talk about the Emission Reduction Plan,

Last year I was very proud to usher in the country’s first, comprehensive, all-of-government Emissions Reduction Plan.

It is a blueprint for a zero-carbon Aotearoa.

With well-paying jobs doing meaningful work, upgrading the country to run on clean energy, with better infrastructure, and to restore our native wildernesses and wildlife. 

There are now sixteen different Ministers, holding eighteen portfolios between them, that are named as having responsibilities in the plan.

So, when I said at AGM two years ago that every Minister is a Climate Change Minister, this is what I meant.

Climate change has gone from being the problem of the Ministry for the Environment and the Minister of Climate Change, to everybody’s problem.

Do you see what is happening there? The Greens, despite not having much power in either of the last two terms, has been changing the culture so that we are now turning in the right direction. This is the set up to taking the action that will really make a difference, if we are bold enough to lean into it.

Shaw spends the second half of the speech talking about the importance of native biodiversity and how this intersects with climate action. For the people that want the Greens to be about the environment, this is where it’s at. For the people following the systems thinking conversation on The Standard this week, this is what the Greens are both pointing to and doing,

One of the main drivers of the climate crisis has been the wholesale destruction of the world’s forests and wildernesses.

Here in Aotearoa, warming from deforestation and land use change is roughly seven times the warming from our fossil emissions.

Think about that.

Our destruction of our natural wildernesses has had seven times the impact on climate change than has our use of fossil fuels.

Since human settlement began, we have removed three quarters of our natural forest cover.

More than half of that deforestation occurred in the last 200 years since colonisation began, and most of that in the last 100 years.

For decades, successive Governments have tried to deal with our biodiversity and climate crises separately, trapping what should be complementary solutions into silos.

But the reality is, neither the biodiversity crisis, nor the climate crisis, can be successfully tackled unless they are tackled together.

I’d really like to see the analyses the seven times figure is based on, because that’s astonishing, but it also presents an opportunity. Understanding that the climate and ecology crises are part of the same dynamic has long been known. The good news is that working on them in an integrated way brings benefits that are more than the sum of the parts. Restoring ecosystems draws down carbon, provides jobs, protects people from heat and mitigates flooding, and retains the levels of biodiversity we need to survive.


There’s a lot of good stuff in this speech. The up front summation of where we are at with climate is blunt and on point, but please read/watch the whole thing for the solutions, and if you want to understand what the Greens are doing this year. This is the party with the actual plan for how to get through the crisis,

What we do over the next few years will profoundly impact the world our children and grandchildren inherit from us.

We can create a world with clean air and water, unlimited renewable energy that powers everything from our cars, to our bikes, to our heat pumps.

And we can have a thriving natural environment that will sustain us well into the future.

And we can do it without increasing the world’s temperature.

All we need is a government with the political courage necessary to match the scale and urgency of the challenges in front of us.

A government that looks at these challenges, not with fear, but with hope


69 comments on “A government looking at the climate challenges, not with fear but with hope ”

  1. Ad 2

    So there are two actual things the Greens propose:

    1. biodiversity credits. Which are kind of like the Emissions Trading Scheme.

    2. A Ministry for Climate Change

    On the first one it would be a very brave person indeed who could claim this ETS was a success. Doubling down with a coded land tax would be an impressive sell to the people of Gisborne or Auckland

    On the second the Ministry of Climate Change as a split-off of MfE would be passed around in Wellington like a bullied kid against the hard players like MPI, MBIE and Treasury. It would need a singularly strong legislative purpose and control some massive fund for people to take note of it.

    It must surely be perplexing that there is no activist call to arms in Shaw's speech. He has just doubled down on more bureaucracy.

    We are in the middle of difficult negotiations with landowners who are Red or Orange stickered and local and central government are taking an awful long time to agree compensation and transition payments. Shaw was silent on fixing actual problems for people.

    We are in the middle of whole suburbs and towns being non-viable due to multiple climate effects: Gisborne, Westport, South Dunedin, Thames, Muriwai, and more. There was nothing on his Managed Retreat and Climate Change Act. Shaw was silent on fixing actual problems for people.

    We are also in the middle of forming a $4billion fund to rebuild after Gabrielle. Can Shaw not actually take off his tie and get up there and do some work? Or even just encourage his supporters to get up there? They need the help. Shaw was silent on fixing actual problems for people.

    It was also really odd that he focused resoundingly on the negative and very little on practical success. The standout being the replacement of the Glenbrook coal furnace. It's like our export-dependent economy didn't exist. Shaw was silent on fixing actual problems for people.

    Anyone can bleat about how bad things are. But politics is about people. People vote. You have to fix problems for people with policy. Shaw just doesn't see that.

    • Patricia Bremner 2.1

      We are in the middle of difficult negotiations….

      That must be incredibly taxing sad and local and national politics making decisions drawn out. Kia kaha Ad you are obviously doing important work.

    • adam 2.2

      It must surely be perplexing that there is no activist call to arms in Shaw's speech. He has just doubled down on more bureaucracy.

      Maybe former contributor Bills verbal image of Shaw has some validity after all??!?!?

      • weka 2.2.1

        Weka: hey look, the Greens did all this governmental building and culture change around climate so that when we are reading to get real about climate all those things are in place.

        Ad: pfft, bureaucracy.

        Didn't Bill think Shaw was a neoliberal shill? Shaw has been a member of the Greens since the party formed. Anyone who thinks he's a neoliberal shill doesn't know what Shaw says or does, or why.

        • adam 2.2.1.1

          I would have thought the polls would be a good indication of how people have reacted to Shaw.

          Personally, I think he is a liberal who thinks there is capitalist solutions to the warming environment.Which is in my humble opinion is a bit fubar at this moment of history.

          I've never been convinced by what Shaw has said or done otherwise. As for motivation – who knows, not really seeing much of that either.

          • weka 2.2.1.1.1

            Why? The GP is to the left or most voters. If you theory was right, more people would vote GP because of Shaw, esp Labour voters.

            • adam 2.2.1.1.1.1

              What are you saying weka?

              Because, Shaw is not to the left of labour in terms of economics, so why would anyone from "the left" vote for him?

              • arkie

                With what evidence do you make that claim? He is co-leader of the Greens, a party that is economically left of Labour, a party still wedded to neoliberal 'market solutions'.

                We will tackle unacceptable levels of inequality and environmental damage through reorienting taxation, regulating markets, bolstering environmental protection, investing in people and innovation, and strengthening education. We will ensure that a Green economy supports all New Zealanders, promotes gender and pay equity, recognises and values unpaid work, and provides a just distribution of our nation’s wealth. Through Green transformation we will create a richer future for ourselves and for future generations.

                https://www.greens.org.nz/economic_policy

                • Dennis Frank

                  Seems perception-driven to me. Not reality-driven. In reality, the Greens have an economic policy that transcends left/right. Perception usually ignores that due to the GPs leaders emphasising practical economic policy initiatives to suit current circumstances.

                  Since these are leftist (focus on helping those adversely affected) perception hones in on leftist framing of their stance.

                  Incredible tho it may seem, it is actually possible to walk & chew gum simultaneously, so there's no valid reason to exclude their long-term economic policy. Their performance is therefore inadequate.

                  Including it in advocacy of an integral view of economic progress would enable voters to grasp that they are serious about collective resilience. They haven't figured that out yet. Green voters can always write to them & ask them to pull finger, eh?

                • adam

                  arkie I said Shaw not the Green party.

                  Feel free to try again.

                  • arkie

                    I note you did not take the opportunity to provide the evidence I requested.

                    Try again.

                  • weka

                    go on then, explain how you think Shaw is not to the left of Labour.

                    • adam

                      I thought I asked you that first weka?

                    • weka []

                      don’t think so. You made the claim that Shaw isn’t to the left of Labour. Are you going to provide any evidence of that?

                    • adam

                      But to your point

                      “the only political party to treat climate change as the crisis it truly is"

                      That is a line only a Tory could pull off. Really, if you think Te Pāti Māori is not on that waka I'd suggest you engage with more Māori media.

                      This within the frame of liberal economics is neither left nor right, it's just wrong.

                      https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/pioneering-green-investor-gets-significant-boos

                      Opps sorry

                      https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/pioneering-green-investor-gets-significant-boost

                      I could go on, do I really need to point all his speeches framed within a economic model which is the problem, not the solution.

                    • weka []

                      It’s an election year. Of course in this speech he’s going to say that the Greens are the only party to treat climate change as the crisis it is. He’s not going to say ‘hey, us, or vote for TPM. And TMP aren’t going to day the reverse either.

                      But this conversation is about Labour and Shaw, not TPM.

                      You just said something Shaw announced is wrong, but you didn’t say how.

                      He works in a neoliberal government. He’s the climate minister but he sits ouside of cabinet apart from meetings with cabinet on climate matters. What this says to me is that Labour are still calling teh shots. Shaw is very good at working within the system to make gains despite the system. He often says that what they are doing is not enough.

                      On Poverty, today,

                      With thousands of households struggling, now is precisely the time to change the tax system.

                      A fair tax on the wealthiest 0.7% people in NZ would raise enough to lift every family out of poverty.

                      If that’s what people want, their only option this year is the Green Party.

                      https://twitter.com/jamespeshaw/status/1678931625545957376

                      Left of Labour (not that it would be hard at the moment).

                    • adam

                      Come arkie, that's not what I said.

                      Please don't make me a straw-man.

                    • adam

                      He sits where he sit because of his economics. And it's liberal economics, go read some of his speeches.

                    • weka []

                      even if that’s true (and I have read his speeches), you still haven’t explained how that makes him not to the left of Labour.

              • weka

                Because, Shaw is not to the left of labour in terms of economics, so why would anyone from "the left" vote for him?

                No. Shaw is to the left of Labour. I'm saying that your argument the GP polling indicates that people don't like Shaw is flawed.

                • adam

                  The age of weather extremes is upon us, and the Greens can only poll 6ish-9ish% if you think Shaw is not a major part of that.

                  I respectfully disagree, he is as appealing as a wet bus ticket and chunk of that is his economics.

    • Simbit 2.3

      Take the tie off?! The price of metaphor is eternal vigilance. He's played his role. Next…

  2. tsmithfield 3

    I was actually very pleased to see the Greens put forward a proposal for encouraging farmers to plant indigenous forest on farm land.

    I assume this would be best applied on land that is marginally productive or unproductive. This would encourage our native birdlife to flourish, and also help minimise erosion of steeper land. And, also mean less ugly pine forests being planted.

    Seems like a no-brainer to me.

    • bwaghorn 3.1

      The farm im on now is doing a couple hectares as we speak the last farm I was on had fenced and planted many hectares of wetland, it's already happening, the greens hassling us more will just turn people of a left coalition more.

      • weka 3.1.1

        they're not hassling you more, they're putting in place frameworks that will make it easier for farmers and other land owners to do the right thing.

        And there still needs to be strong incentives, because for every farmer like you there are others still chopping down trees, draining wetlands, and flattening land for dairy farms.

        • bwaghorn 3.1.1.1

          Na it's another layer of invasiveness, just let them claim credits on any land fenced off and planted,

          I’ve seen a few farmers getting fined for wetland removal so I’m picking those days are over,

          It’s not been my doing on the 2 farms I’ve been on , still just lower management.

      • KJT 3.1.2

        Net wetland loss.

        New Zealand’s (including the Chatham Islands) freshwater wetland area decreased by 1,498 hectares (0.6 percent) in the most recent period between 2012 and 2018.

        This loss is a continuation of an ongoing pattern of net loss. Overall New Zealand lost 5,761 hectares of freshwater wetlands between 1996 and 2018

        https://www.wetlandtrust.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ROOT-CAUSES-OF-WETLAND-LOSS-IN-NZ_Jan-2021.pdf

        “Over 90% was converted to grassland for grazing”.

      • tsmithfield 3.1.3

        Similar could be done around water ways as is being done in new subdivisions, in Christchurch anyway. That is, ensure the banks of water ways are well planted out with flaxes and other native plants that grow well in those locations. These tend to grow very densely. So, create natural barriers to prevent stock from getting close to the water ways. Hopefully, the plants would also absorb a lot of nitrates before they reach the water ways.

  3. Patricia Bremner 4

    I see Shaw's speech as a way to avoid what you and departments are dealing with.

    It was not Shaw and the Greens who did not listen. Your comments smack of "do something now" when the causes of now were foretold 30 years ago.

    A unified approach makes total sense, and yes, at the same time we have to deal with "now" and the hedonists.

    Even in the worst crisis long term planning is necessary, that does not negate sympathy for current plights.imo.

    But you are right, we do need a plan to mitigate the current fallout as well. Don’t forget he was talking to people in the Greens.

  4. Mike the Lefty 5

    What is encouraging about all this is that climate change has become more and more a central election issue with each election that occurs. National and ACT, and to a lesser extent Labour, want to try and sideline it by making the economy, law and order, and the cost of living the central issues. Judging by recent polls, a growing number of people are demanding that political parties treat it as a serious issue and have policies. That shows up the weakness of the political right because National's policies reflect a cavalier attitude to climate change whilst ACT barely acknowledges its existence.

    The public are demanding more, the Greens are the only ones with a real response and that may well win them more support at the election.

    • Belladonna 5.1

      Hmm – I'd say that climate change only becomes a central election issue in popular perception – when we are in the midst of a major weather event. People forget very quickly.

      The Ipsos survey had climate change in the top 5 issues (27% percent) in February 23 (right in the middle of the Auckland weather bomb and Cyclone Gabrielle).

      But, by the latest survey (May 23) – it had already dropped to 23% (only just making the top 5 – with no. 6 on the list at 22%, The Economy)

      Way out-ranked by the 'traditional' issues: cost of living, cost of housing, healthcare and crime. Crime, in particular, is skyrocketing as a cause of concern – from no. 5 to no. 2 in a year.

      https://www.ipsos.com/en-nz/20th-ipsos-new-zealand-issues-monitor

      https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2023-06/20th%20Ipsos%20New%20Zealand%20Issues%20Monitor%20%28May%202023%29.pdf

      There is greater concern over climate change in the medium term (next 5 years) – but it only pushes it to 4th in concern (outranked by cost of living, crime and healthcare).

      While The Greens are regarded as the party best fitted to deal with climate change, National is regarded as the best to deal with cost of living, crime and housing (go figure) – 3 of the top issues; while Labour is regarded as the best to deal with healthcare.

      • Shanreagh 5.1.1

        This is very interesting BD.

        Even though CC is down the ranks a little in spot 5 it still needs to be nudged to view so electors can see the effects of inaction.

        Some of the food shortages and related cost of living increases do link back to CC ie crops wiped out leading to shortages etc. Getting houses that are fit for living in in NZ ie not built on flood or erosion prone areas, not being sited on wall to wall concrete outside so run-off is controlled all have a link to CC.

        That we can affect CC for good or bad and also mitigate it gives hope.

        We have had devastating floods etc in HB & Gisborne. We need to deal with the effects of these. The logs may represent a niche to make the best of something bad, while looking at what to do in the future.

        After the huge Mangatu slip out of Gisborne the future was seen to be the planting in pines to control stability. NZ Forest Service had a more managed outlook to its pine plantations but the cutting rights were sold as part of the Neo lib era to mainly foreign firms. Being granted these areas they see them as being capable of being logged as they would not have been leased had they not been type of reasoning,

        PF Olsen, a noted forester, wrote this paper in 1970 about production/protection in the Mangatu area.

        http://nzjf.org.nz/free_issues/NZJF15_2_1970/AF80D9D6-DA72-4CD7-BF25-CC07D390FA45.pdf

        The same story plays out in the Whareratas between Wairoa-Gisborne and Devil's Elbow forests around Tangoio out of Napier. Areas planted largely for protection purposes, cutting rights on sold and land is practically clear felled.

        Liberally season this with increased weather load caused by CC and we are back where we were in the 1960s.

        So a bit away but perhaps the answer is to find the CC link in issues 1-4 so it is continually in view.

        The answer may not be to repalnt in pines but to repalnt as protection forest in natives. This will mean biting the bullet on assessing if the cutting rights we have issued at the moment are fit for future purpose.

        • Belladonna 5.1.1.1

          The forest owners are saying that it's not all slash which is causing the issue – but whole trees, being eroded out in landslides – so plantings which should have been stabilizing land, are not doing the required job.

          severely impacted by Cyclone Gabrielle with landslides taking out strips of 10-to-20 year old trees, roots and all.

          Woods said most of what the company has lost and ended up in waterways isn’t slash, or forestry waste, but full trees.

          “We would have thought those trees would have been stabilising the sites, and typically it does, so we are doing a lot of work on why those ages [of trees], was it soil or sickness, or did it just happen?”

          Woods said it had native trees in the Aratu Estate and they have also slid down hillsides into rivers.

          “This is the vast majority of the material that we see in mobilising onto beaches and properties. There is some form of sawn-off material, but the vast majority is actually these other trees that have come out, the younger trees.”

          https://www.interest.co.nz/business/120122/gisborne-forestry-company-aratu-says-it-has-lost-trees-worth-tens-millions-cyclone

          • Shanreagh 5.1.1.1.1

            I agree…multi causes. I do think though a focus on more clear felling may set in train changes that destablise the hillsides. The area has very erosion prone soils and a careful removal regime may have helped avoid whole hillsides including older trees being on the move.

            We may never know but it was not the type of management that NZFS had in mind/did. Of course as a Govt dept with huge landholdings there was more ability to treat land carefully here but log it intensively in other areas. .

            • Belladonna 5.1.1.1.1.1

              I think – entirely unscientifically, and with no supporting data ; that it's just the reality of occupying a highly hilly environment, with friable land-slip prone soils – during a high rainfall period.

              There are possibly some things we can do to mitigate for the future (and certainly things we can do to not make the situation worse) – but there are always going to be landslides and forest wash-outs during high rain-fall events.

              These occur not only on recent forestry plantings – but on what is the closest we can come to untouched native forest (e.g. Te Urewera)

              The geological history of NZ is replete with historic massive landslides changing the contours of the land.

  5. That_guy 6

    I have a lot of respect for Shaw because he's never made it about him. He would have been justified in saying "fuck y'all, I'm off to TOP" (which is entirely plausible since he and Raf are apparently friends).

    He's obviously decided that somebody has to do the boring stuff, somebody has to eat some shit sandwiches and do what is necessary to get as much work done as possible.

    I'm grateful.

    • georgecom 6.1

      agreed. he did the work to build climate change infrastructure which wasn't popular at times or widely celebrated but he stuck at it. last piece of that first phase jigsaw is get farming to pay for emissions. I sincerely hope it's the greens in the govt, bugger the rural and political sectors who want to kick the can down the road for another 7 years, repeating the past 15 years from the do nothing rural sectors and national party

    • weka 6.2

      I also have a lot of respect for him on this. Imgaine understanding the nature of the crisis and choosing to work in an area where you are constantly thwarted on what needs to be done but you stay and do the work because it still needs to be done and it's better that it's you rather than someone who doesn't get the nature of the crisis.

      I do think some people are better at this kind of compromise than others, but it still take strength and commitment. I couldn't do it.

  6. Shanreagh 7

    A different view of The Greens Climate change policy.

    The point that I do agree with No right Turn on is …'no increased ambition'. I would class that as aspirational. Often Govt parties hide the aspirational stuff in case it 'frightens the horses'. However if we cannot lift our eyes to see where we want to be, doing the day to day in support sometimes loses its glow.

    https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2023/07/climate-change-underwhelming.html

    And the Greens are offering us… the status quo. Oh, there are tweaks: a standalone Ministry, moving control of ETS settings to the Climate Change Commission and out of the hands of politicians – but these are bureaucratic fiddles. There's no new policies for emissions reduction, no increased ambition, nothing substantive.

    This is still the best climate change policy on offer. But I expected more from the Greens. And if they're not going to offer what's required, then who will?

    Anyway another view from the Left.

    Perhaps Labour will offer a better set of Climate Change policies…that would be a turn up for the books…..Labour pulling The Greens into (a better) position on Climate Change. wink

    • Incognito 7.1

      Seems to me that if the Greens don’t promise the CC equivalent of 100,000 homes in 10 years they get (heavily) criticised and if they do they get ridiculed. Nobody seems to have heard of Realpolitik – whiners & dreamers.

      • Shanreagh 7.1.1

        I thought the view of No RightTurn was interesting as it was from the left and indicated a view that something a bit stronger may have been more acceptable and the Greens may not have picked this up. Leaves the territory open for bold climate change ideas hence my tongue in cheek comment about Labour.

        Don't really see the need for 'whiners/dreamers/realpolitik' Nothing to do with any of these loaded words or your 100,000 houses view. I did say that 'aspirational' often excites…

        Just a straight placing by me of an interesting info/view from the left.

        Don't you have a view on whether the CC policy could have been a bit bolder as mentioned by NRT? Or is it perfection in a policy in your view?

  7. Dennis Frank 8

    On the relation of policy to circumstance, get this:

    Scientific research has shown that El Niño-related rainfall over the tropical Pacific Ocean consistently increases in a warming world regardless of whether El Niño strengthens. However, the strength of El Niño and La Niña events is also vitally important in understanding how their impacts may change. If El Niño gets stronger its rainfall impacts will be even more severe. This means even less rainfall in some parts of the world and even more in others. Overall, recent research suggests that in many regions of the world, current El Niño and La Niña impacts will be enhanced or become more extreme with warming.

    How El Niño and La Niña are predicted to change with time is linked to the world's CO2 emissions pathway — that means, which decisions humans take in terms of carbon emissions will be extremely important in how the events evolve in the future. The climate models used to investigate the future of El Niño and La Niña are state-of-the-art computer simulations also used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    https://www.newsroom.co.nz/sustainable-future/how-el-nino-is-set-to-change

    Models simulate future reality. In current reality, we look for a convergence pattern or trend to assess the utility of models we use. With climate change models we rely on a consensus of experts since we can't do the appraisal ourselves.

    So the thing to watch for now is the extent to which El Nino warps the overall warming trend. More rain on the East Coast, Auckland and Northland or not? Hills being transformed into mudslides are the current reality. Will the switch to El Nino escalate this effect or reduce it?? Policy gradualism is all very well, and James has done it effectively. Extremes of weather inevitably increase public focus on practical remedies though – which requires governance more than it requires policy development.

    • Shanreagh 8.1

      Extremes of weather inevitably increase public focus on practical remedies though – which requires governance more than it requires policy development.

      Goodness talk about convergence DF.

      I have just been thinking about CC and forestry as well.

      5.1.1

      11 July 2023 at 11:48 am

      • Dennis Frank 8.1.1

        Yes. Seems to portend a tactical switch towards regional governance. However that will only kick in if normal governance is seen to be too gradualist to be useful.

        I suspect we are in an interim situation – a state of waiting to see an emerging trend from El Nino. If the summer & autumn weather was produced by La Nina, we may not get more of those aerial superhighways of water heading our way from the tropics, which will be a relief! However the long-term view must blend both those hemispherical climate patterns.

      • weka 8.1.2

        are you meaning for your email address to be visible? It's in your name and your copypasta.

        • Shanreagh 8.1.2.1

          That is weird as I just copied/pasted directly from the page here on TS. Didn't go anywhere near my emails. Is it possible to remove it…..I have checked that the comment from TS shows up when you click just the date/time. perhaps let me have time to edit again?

          Going back to the comment writing page it says that the email address will not be published?

          • weka 8.1.2.1.1

            your email is in the webpage field as well and that is what is making your user name a clickable link and the email address visible if one hovers over it.

            When you copy and paste your user name in TS into a comment, the link stays live and it can be seen in your new comment.

            Can you please tell me what device you are using to comment on TS today?

            • weka 8.1.2.1.1.1

              I've removed the email address from the webpage field, which means it no longer shows in your comment. Please make sure when you comment next that the webpage field is empty.

              I also edited the comment so your email doesn't show there.

              But your email still shows in historic comments. Is this a problem?

              • Shanreagh

                Running windows on a HP laptop.

                I deleted the website, which was still there even after you had taken it off and it will post the comment without it.

                For the future if I just post the date/time and no name presumably my email won't show? Was the mistake I made catching and linking my name as part of the live link?

        • Shanreagh 8.1.2.2

          Thank you Weka. smiley

    • Incognito 8.2

      Models simulate future reality. In current reality, we look for a convergence pattern or trend to assess the utility of models we use.

      That’s inaccurate and misleading and you should know better than to spout this kind of sloppy pseudo-expert assertion – models and simulations are different things with different objectives.

      • Dennis Frank 8.2.1

        Users normally use futuristic models to simulate the future is the generalisation I was implying. They assess the correspondence between model & reality to decide if to tweak the design or not. Any developmental trend that is relevant gets integrated via feedback and pattern recognition…

        • Incognito 8.2.1.1

          Oh, FFS, ‘futuristic models’! Your word soups sometimes are nothing but pseudo-intellectual BS – model simulations and futuristic models are also different things.

          Why don’t you start saying & explaining what you mean instead of ‘implying’ and being vague, sloppy & misleading and leaving the readers to fill in the rest through paranormal mind-reading and psycho-osmotic mind-melts with the collective consciousness?

          • Dennis Frank 8.2.1.1.1

            I did. smiley Your lack of comprehension isn't my problem. If you can't follow my explanation try pointing to your personal difficulty with it and asking others if they see the same problem. If you generate a consensus with other readers on that point, I'm likely to take it seriously…

            • Incognito 8.2.1.1.1.1

              Nope, you are conflating things, which has nothing to do with my reading or other comprehension.

              Don’t ‘imply’ that I should start a petition or conduct a poll before you take criticism or corrections of your conscious confusing seriously. Lift your game!

              • Dennis Frank

                Happy to lift my game – in principle. However I don't get any relevance to current issues. I acknowledge you have attempted to indicate relevance.

                conscious confusing

                You seems to be airing a subjective reaction. Relevance to anyone else is not evident. Perhaps Weka can ascertain relevance?

                • Incognito

                  Many (most?) of your comments are very dense and complex and they are (almost?) impossible to parse & understand for someone who is not familiar with the topics, or who does not share the same perspective as you. Indeed, it resembles rambling and sounds irrelevant instead of a hint of a minimal effort to provide a more direct or practical answer to a question, for example. It begs the question why you’re doing this here on TS to a general audience of readers?

                  The relevance is this: you clearly take corners with accuracy & truth on some topics even though you make it sound assertive & knowledgeable when this is doubtful, to say the least. How then can we have confidence in the rest of your word soups? It is relevant to your general commenting behaviour here.

      • Shanreagh 8.2.2

        @incognito
        I'm being blunt.

        This is a very annoying discussion trait…..to tell someone off for doing something, or explaining something in a way you don't like, but to make no attempt to frame it in a way so that we can look at the difference your framing would have made.

        So can we still discuss convergence? Just not models and simulations in the same sentence? Actually I had no problem understanding the point being made by DF.

        • Incognito 8.2.2.1

          An annoying trait is some commenters wasting oxygen on this site with BS.

          An annoying trait is some commenters being unclear, inaccurate, or plain wrong in their assertions.

          Fake news and fake claims are annoying.

          Someone who claims or pretends to have a good grasp of the stuff they comment about can at least make some effort to explain properly without misleading others.

          Lazy & sloppy comments are annoying.

          Words have meanings. Concepts have meanings. For robust debate people need to be on the same page or we might end up going around in circles talking past each other, talking over each other, which is all very annoying and a fucking waste of time.

          It is not even about framing as such, it is about being clear, transparent, honest, accountable and having integrity in robust debate. Assertions are not simply subjective opinions that one can ‘frame’ in a certain way.

          Intellectual wanking is as annoying as political or ideological wanking.

          • Shanreagh 8.2.2.1.1

            Yet you do us the discourtesy of not allowing us to see how your way of explanation would have made an improvement, because you have not given it. This is also concerning for the free flow of debate and extending of knowledge.

            I took convergence and the idea that a person looking at studies etc in the here and now could be looking across many/several done in different ways. I've been in this situation and done this when we cannot wait.

            Anyway are you able to explain why you did not like model and simulation wrapped up in the same sentence?

            I for one would really like to know.

            Please.

            • Drowsy M. Kram 8.2.2.1.1.1

              Perfect is the enemy of good

              "All models are wrong but some are useful"

              I'm fine with having "model and simulation wrapped up in the same sentence", provided the sentence doesn't give a misleading impression that the terms are interchangeable.

              A simulation is the imitation of the operation of a real-world process or system over time. Simulations require the use of models; the model represents the key characteristics or behaviors of the selected system or process, whereas the simulation represents the evolution of the model over time. Often, computers are used to execute the simulation.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation

              Cycles of 'model-simulation-model-simulation' can test and/or refine models.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_simulation#Simulation_versus_model

              • Dennis Frank

                Cycles of 'model-simulation-model-simulation' can test and/or refine models.

                Well yeah, that's normal scientific practice. You & I know that due to graduating in science but as far as I've seen here, Incognito hasn't – which could explain the complaint…

            • Incognito 8.2.2.1.1.2

              Model, simulation, and futuristic model, et cetera, are not synonymous; the onus is on DF to correct himself and explain what he meant. He knows or should know the difference, as a Physics graduate. Generalisation is still no excuse for inaccurate and misleading use of the terms and conflating them. Ask DF about orbit and orbital, for example – he wouldn’t use them synonymously because they are different things.

              Drowsy M. Kram has already obliged, I see.

              FYI, ‘futuristic model’ is not a common term or concept in science; it is parlance in a different domain. Forecast or prediction are more common terms; they are not simulations; simulations are not models; not all models are used for simulations or predictions. DF does know better and that’s annoying.

              • Shanreagh

                For what it's worth the fact that the words 'model' & 'simulation' were separate but together but in the same sentence said* to me that different 'things' were being referred to. Otherwise wouldn't a collective noun be used, if there is one? 'Experiments'/'tests' are the only collectives I can think of and have the flavour of General Science.

                • shook a few brain cells to remember that I had been told/knew they were not synonyms.

                Drowsy said

                I'm fine with having "model and simulation wrapped up in the same sentence", provided the sentence doesn't give a misleading impression that the terms are interchangeable.

                I did not read them as synonyms or interchangeable.

                To me the point was about ‘convergence’ that a person might see when looking across several studies done differently.

  8. Shanreagh 9

    Talking of forestry/slash/East Coast, CC and weather here is the report of the Committee looking at Forestry slash chaired by Hon Hekia Parata.

    https://environment.govt.nz/what-government-is-doing/areas-of-work/land/ministerial-inquiry-into-land-use/

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/489748/forestry-report-urges-immediate-halt-on-wide-scale-felling

    Even a hat tip to CC implications & action by CC policy would be good.

    This report and its followup may provide a model for the future. And a belated recognition to the geographers, geomorphologists, forestry and land use planners who fought valiantly aganst the crazy stuff coming out of The Treasury when looking at land/forest and protection/plantation allocations. (largely to no avail)

    The mosaic management mentioned in the Parata Report sounds interestingly similar to the approach from the olden days. But what a waste of money and human needs/jobs etc and the breakup of small towns where forest workers lived in towns and were not flown in.

    Perhaps down with gradualism (and thinking rather than doing) using the Parata report as a baseline.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Major investment in teacher supply through Budget 24
    Over the next four years, Budget 24 will support the training and recruitment of 1,500 teachers into the workforce, Education Minister Erica Stanford announced today. “To raise achievement and develop a world leading education system we’re investing nearly $53 million over four years to attract, train and retain our valued ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    9 hours ago
  • Joint statement on the New Zealand – Cook Islands Joint Ministerial Forum – 2024
    1.  New Zealand Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Rt Hon Winston Peters; Minister of Health and Minister for Pacific Peoples Hon Dr Shane Reti; and Minister for Climate Change Hon Simon Watts hosted Cook Islands Minister of Foreign Affairs and Immigration Hon Tingika Elikana and Minister of Health Hon Vainetutai Rose Toki-Brown on 24 May ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Middle East, Africa deployments extended
    The Government has approved two-year extensions for four New Zealand Defence Force deployments to the Middle East and Africa, Defence Minister Judith Collins and Foreign Minister Winston Peters announced today. “These deployments are long-standing New Zealand commitments, which reflect our ongoing interest in promoting peace and stability, and making active ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Climate Change Commission Chair to retire
    The Climate Change Commission Chair, Dr Rod Carr, has confirmed his plans to retire at the end of his term later this year, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “Prior to the election, Dr Carr advised me he would be retiring when his term concluded. Dr Rod Carr has led ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Inaugural Board of Integrity Sport & Recreation Commission announced
    Nine highly respected experts have been appointed to the inaugural board of the new Integrity Sport and Recreation Commission, Sport & Recreation Minister Chris Bishop says. “The Integrity Sport and Recreation Commission is a new independent Crown entity which was established under the Integrity Sport and Recreation Act last year, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • A balanced Foreign Affairs budget
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters confirmed today that Vote Foreign Affairs in Budget 2024 will balance two crucial priorities of the Coalition Government.    While Budget 2024 reflects the constrained fiscal environment, the Government also recognises the critical role MFAT plays in keeping New Zealanders safe and prosperous.    “Consistent with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New social housing places to support families into homes
    New social housing funding in Budget 2024 will ensure the Government can continue supporting more families into warm, dry homes from July 2025, Housing Ministers Chris Bishop and Tama Potaka say. “Earlier this week I was proud to announce that Budget 2024 allocates $140 million to fund 1,500 new social ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Zealand’s minerals future
    Introduction Today, we are sharing a red-letter occasion. A Blackball event on hallowed ground. Today  we underscore the importance of our mineral estate. A reminder that our natural resource sector has much to offer.  Such a contribution will not come to pass without investment.  However, more than money is needed. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government sets out vision for minerals future
    Increasing national and regional prosperity, providing the minerals needed for new technology and the clean energy transition, and doubling the value of minerals exports are the bold aims of the Government’s vision for the minerals sector. Resources Minister Shane Jones today launched a draft strategy for the minerals sector in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government progresses Māori wards legislation
    The coalition Government’s legislation to restore the rights of communities to determine whether to introduce Māori wards has passed its first reading in Parliament, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says. “Divisive changes introduced by the previous government denied local communities the ability to determine whether to establish Māori wards.” The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • First RMA amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
    The coalition Government has today introduced legislation to slash the tangle of red and green tape throttling some of New Zealand’s key sectors, including farming, mining and other primary industries. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop says the Government is committed to  unlocking development and investment while ensuring the environment is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government welcomes EPA decision
    The decision by Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to approve the continued use of hydrogen cyanamide, known as Hi-Cane, has been welcomed by Environment Minister Penny Simmonds and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay.  “The EPA decision introduces appropriate environmental safeguards which will allow kiwifruit and other growers to use Hi-Cane responsibly,” Ms ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Speech to Employers and Manufacturers Association: Relief for today, hope for tomorrow
    Kia ora, Ngā mihi nui ki a koutou kātoa Tāmaki Herenga Waka, Tāmaki Herenga tangata Ngā mihi ki ngā mana whenua o tēnei rohe Ngāti Whātua ō Ōrākei me nga iwi kātoa kua tae mai. Mauriora. Greetings everyone. Thank you to the EMA for hosting this event. Let me acknowledge ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government invests in 1,500 more social homes
    The coalition Government is investing in social housing for New Zealanders who are most in need of a warm dry home, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. Budget 2024 will allocate $140 million in new funding for 1,500 new social housing places to be provided by Community Housing Providers (CHPs), not ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • $24 million boost for Gumboot Friday
    Thousands more young New Zealanders will have better access to mental health services as the Government delivers on its commitment to fund the Gumboot Friday initiative, says Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey.  “Budget 2024 will provide $24 million over four years to contract the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Residential Tenancies Amendment Bill passes first reading
    The Coalition Government’s Residential Tenancies Amendment Bill, which will improve tenancy laws and help increase the supply of rental properties, has passed its first reading in Parliament says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “The Bill proposes much-needed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 that will remove barriers to increasing private ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Montecassino Commemorative Address, Cassino War Cemetery
    Standing here in Cassino War Cemetery, among the graves looking up at the beautiful Abbey of Montecassino, it is hard to imagine the utter devastation left behind by the battles which ended here in May 1944. Hundreds of thousands of shells and bombs of every description left nothing but piled ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • First Reading – Repeal of Section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989
    I present a legislative statement on the Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill Mr. Speaker, I move that the Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill be now read a first time. I nominate the Social Services and Community Committee to consider the Bill. Thank you, Mr. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • First reading of 7AA’s repeal: progress for children
    The Bill to repeal Section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act has had its first reading in Parliament today. The Bill reaffirms the Coalition Government’s commitment to the care and safety of children in care, says Minister for Children Karen Chhour.  “When I became the Minister for Children, I made ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • China Business Summit 2024
    Kia ora koutou, good morning, and zao shang hao. Thank you Fran for the opportunity to speak at the 2024 China Business Summit – it’s great to be here today. I’d also like to acknowledge: Simon Bridges - CEO of the Auckland Chamber of Commerce. His Excellency Ambassador - Wang ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Assisted depatures from New Caledonia
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed a New Zealand Government plane will head to New Caledonia in the next hour in the first in a series of proposed flights to begin bringing New Zealanders home.    “New Zealanders in New Caledonia have faced a challenging few days - and bringing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Assisted departures from New Caledonia
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed a New Zealand Government plane will head to New Caledonia in the next hour in the first in a series of proposed flights to begin bringing New Zealanders home.  “New Zealanders in New Caledonia have faced a challenging few days - and bringing them ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government to rollout roadside drug testing
    The Coalition Government will introduce legislation this year that will enable roadside drug testing as part of our commitment to improve road safety and restore law and order, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.  “Alcohol and drugs are the number one contributing factor in fatal road crashes in New Zealand. In ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Minister responds to review of Kāinga Ora
    The Government has announced a series of immediate actions in response to the independent review of Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “Kāinga Ora is a large and important Crown entity, with assets of $45 billion and over $2.5 billion of expenditure each year. It ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Pseudoephedrine back on shelves
    Associate Health Minister David Seymour is pleased that Pseudoephedrine can now be purchased by the general public to protect them from winter illness, after the coalition government worked swiftly to change the law and oversaw a fast approval process by Medsafe. “Pharmacies are now putting the medicines back on their ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New Zealand-China Business Summit
    Tēnā koutou katoa. Da jia hao.  Good morning everyone.   Prime Minister Luxon, your excellency, a great friend of New Zealand and my friend Ambassador Wang, Mayor of what he tells me is the best city in New Zealand, Wayne Brown, the highly respected Fran O’Sullivan, Champion of the Auckland business ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New measures to protect powerlines from trees
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced that the Government will make it easier for lines firms to take action to remove vegetation from obstructing local powerlines. The change will ensure greater security of electricity supply in local communities, particularly during severe weather events.  “Trees or parts of trees falling on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Wairarapa Moana ki Pouakani win top Māori dairy farming award
    Wairarapa Moana ki Pouakani were the top winners at this year’s Ahuwhenua Trophy awards recognising the best in Māori dairy farming. Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka announced the winners and congratulated runners-up, Whakatōhea Māori Trust Board, at an awards celebration also attended by Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Finance Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • DJ Fred Again – Assurance report received
    "On the 27th of March, I sought assurances from the Chief Executive, Department of Internal Affairs, that the Department’s correct processes and policies had been followed in regards to a passport application which received media attention,” says Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden.  “I raised my concerns after being ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • District Court Judges appointed
    Attorney-General Judith Collins has announced the appointment of three new District Court Judges, to replace Judges who have recently retired. Peter James Davey of Auckland has been appointed a District Court Judge with a jury jurisdiction to be based at Whangarei. Mr Davey initially started work as a law clerk/solicitor with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Unions should put learning ahead of ideology
    Associate Education Minister David Seymour is calling on the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) to put ideology to the side and focus on students’ learning, in reaction to the union holding paid teacher meetings across New Zealand about charter schools.     “The PPTA is disrupting schools up and down the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Craig Stobo appointed as chair of FMA
    Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly today announced the appointment of Craig Stobo as the new chair of the Financial Markets Authority (FMA). Mr Stobo takes over from Mark Todd, whose term expired at the end of April. Mr Stobo’s appointment is for a five-year term. “The FMA plays ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Budget 2024 invests in lifeguards and coastguard
    Surf Life Saving New Zealand and Coastguard New Zealand will continue to be able to keep people safe in, on, and around the water following a funding boost of $63.644 million over four years, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Associate Transport Minister Matt Doocey say. “Heading to the beach for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand and Tuvalu reaffirm close relationship
    New Zealand and Tuvalu have reaffirmed their close relationship, Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says.  “New Zealand is committed to working with Tuvalu on a shared vision of resilience, prosperity and security, in close concert with Australia,” says Mr Peters, who last visited Tuvalu in 2019.  “It is my pleasure ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand calls for calm, constructive dialogue in New Caledonia
    New Zealand is gravely concerned about the situation in New Caledonia, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.  “The escalating situation and violent protests in Nouméa are of serious concern across the Pacific Islands region,” Mr Peters says.  “The immediate priority must be for all sides to take steps to de-escalate the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand welcomes Samoa Head of State
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon met today with Samoa’s O le Ao o le Malo, Afioga Tuimalealiifano Vaaletoa Sualauvi II, who is making a State Visit to New Zealand. “His Highness and I reflected on our two countries’ extensive community links, with Samoan–New Zealanders contributing to all areas of our national ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Island Direct eligible for SuperGold Card funding
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has announced that he has approved Waiheke Island ferry operator Island Direct to be eligible for SuperGold Card funding, paving the way for a commercial agreement to bring the operator into the scheme. “Island Direct started operating in November 2023, offering an additional option for people ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Further sanctions against Russia
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters today announced further sanctions on 28 individuals and 14 entities providing military and strategic support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.  “Russia is directly supported by its military-industrial complex in its illegal aggression against Ukraine, attacking its sovereignty and territorial integrity. New Zealand condemns all entities and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • One year on from Loafers Lodge
    A year on from the tragedy at Loafers Lodge, the Government is working hard to improve building fire safety, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “I want to share my sincere condolences with the families and friends of the victims on the anniversary of the tragic fire at Loafers ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Pre-Budget speech to Auckland Business Chamber
    Ka nui te mihi kia koutou. Kia ora and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you so much for having me here in the lead up to my Government’s first Budget. Before I get started can I acknowledge: Simon Bridges – Auckland Business Chamber CEO. Steve Jurkovich – Kiwibank CEO. Kids born ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-05-26T05:36:35+00:00