web analytics

Apologists

Written By: - Date published: 3:00 pm, July 29th, 2009 - 58 comments
Categories: corruption, law and "order", national/act government - Tags:

Picture this:

Anchor “and now we go live to whatsherface outside the High Court in Christchurch to tell us the latest in the Weatherston trial”

Whatsherface “the prosecution is saying that Weatherston committed a grave breach of the Crimes Act but, look, I know of this other guy who killed someone and he was never caught. It happens all the time. So maybe Weatherston’s only mistake was being so obvious about it. Let’s not be too hard on him”

Horrible. Dispicable. That reporter would never work again.

It’s the line we got from Garner and Mold last night, and Patterson this morning: ‘we’ve been getting secret leaks of personal info for years. Bennett’s only mistake was doing it openly’.

No. Her mistake wasn’t getting caught. She broke the law. It was illegal when ministers did it on the sly. You should have dobbed them in. It’s illegal now.

Obviously this was fed to the media from Key’s office. Garner and Mold didn’t magically come up with the same line to round off their reports. Do better guys. Don’t be apologists for bullying ministers who have broken the law.

Even if you know others have broken the law. Even if Taylor suggested it really nicely and promises you some titbits in return.

58 comments on “Apologists ”

  1. Obviously this was fed to the media from Key’s office. Garner and Mold didn’t magically come up with the same line to round off their reports.

    The TV reporters caucus on their angles all the time. I presume that Guyon Espiner voiced this opinion and Garner and Mold quickly agreed with it. I highly doubt Key’s office was involved.

  2. Maynard J 2

    I get the impression that what is done often is that someone (minister, aide etc) would suggest “why do you not take a look at how much these people get”. Reporters would then use information that is in the public domain and decide if that was relevant (i.e. in general, how much DPB is given based on number of kids etc).

    That does not seem remotely similar to relasing actual details of payments in terms of method or outcome. In these other cases they mention, the minister might have the information, but does not disclose it. What the reporters were talking about seems to indicate they cannot see the difference either.

  3. Mike 3

    It would be quite interesting (ok not really), to go back and look at reporting surrounding various Labour government scandals and see how many times the reports are ‘balanced’ by equating the scandal of the day to the actions of the National governments in the 90s.

    I’m guessing the number is close to zero.

  4. Tim Ellis 4

    Apart from the distasteful and hysterical way that you have compared Weatherston’s actions with Ms Bennett, there is a genuine dispute about whether what Ms Bennett was legal. I think she probably should have sought legal advice before releasing the information, or erred on the side of caution. The point that the reporters make is very important, though. Labour have been shrieking “muldoonism” and more than one poster here has said that it’s a new precedent that didn’t happen before.

    What the reporters are all saying is that the media were regularly fed spin and information from Labour’s ministers, providing the other side of the story.

    Personally I think it’s refreshing for a Minister to front up with information, rather than providing sly, sneaky documents. The issue isn’t whether somebody gets caught. That is hysterical nonsense. The issue is whether it is a common practice by Ministers to release sensitive information about individuals when they complain publicly about their circumstances and withhold information. It appears that this practice was common under the last Government.

    • Maynard J 4.1

      “there is a genuine dispute about whether what Ms Bennett was legal.”

      I think she has been since she was 16.

      “The issue is whether it is a common practice by Ministers to release sensitive information about individuals when they complain publicly about their circumstances and withhold information.”

      Not what anyone I have heard from said. They said that the ministers might suggest where reporters might want to look, not that they release information directly.

      Can you please define hysterical, Tim, because it is a term you fire about frequently and it seems to mean no more that “Tim does not agree with this”. Your line about “Labour shrieking Muldoonism” has got to be more hysterical than anything written here. “Hysterics: Tim shrieking ‘Labour shrieking Muldoonism'”…

    • BLiP 4.2

      The issue is whether it is a common practice by Ministers to release sensitive information about individuals when they complain publicly about their circumstances and withhold information.

      Been onto the phone to your mates at Crosby/Textor and given your talking points with which to muddy the situation with your dribble and seek to climb out of the hole Bully Bennett has dug, Timothy?

      The issue is whether or not it is okay for the government to illegally use the resources of the state to silence dissent. Your blethering amounts to collusion with the John Key National Government Inc position that, yes, its okay.

  5. IrishBill 5

    You may well be right Danyl but like I’ve said I am unaware of personal details from a private citizen’s state-held file being shopped to a journo like this either on or off the record. If Garner or Mold have examples of this happening before I’d expect them to put them in the public eye.

    I suspect the truth is they don’t.

  6. As I’ve said on my blog, Lianne Dalziel leaked legal papers regarding an immigration case to TV3, lied about it and was forced to resign.

    My understanding is that Labour Ministers and staffers DID leak private information to the press, but in an off-the-record capacity that was designed to influence the way the story was covered without putting the information out there for the public. So, hypothetically, if someone was attacking CYFS for taking their child into custody a staffer would inform the media that CYFS records showed that the child was being abused, but that they were unable to say so publically because that would breach privacy.

    • Draco T Bastard 6.1

      One case where the person who did it was forced to resign. You hypothetical situation is actually legal from my reading of the privacy act.

    • Tim Ellis 6.2

      The CYFS case is probably a bit different, Danyl as it concerns the welfare of a child.

      • snoozer 6.2.1

        Can you point to the section of the Privacy Act that says ‘if you’re an adult, this Act does not apply?’

        of course you can’t because you’re full of crap.

        • Tim Ellis 6.2.1.1

          No that’s not what I said snoozer. It is well established in criminal law that the perpetrator of violence or abuse against a child can’t be identified if it would identify the identity of the child.

          • BLiP 6.2.1.1.1

            Bullshit.

            • IrishBill 6.2.1.1.1.1

              He’s right. That is the law and it’s why the courts generally grant permanent name suppression to people that sexually abuse their children.

            • BLiP 6.2.1.1.1.2

              No he’s not. This is what he said:

              It is well established in criminal law that the perpetrator of violence or abuse against a child can’t be identified if it would identify the identity of the child.

              Just one exampleof the sad litany of child abuse in New Zealand: Kahui. Timothy may have meant that the names of children who survive sexual abuse and/or violence carried out by someone who would by association identify the victim then, yes. Otherwise, its another example of Timothy bullshit.

            • BLiP 6.2.1.1.1.3

              No he’s not. This is what he said:

              It is well established in criminal law that the perpetrator of violence or abuse against a child can’t be identified if it would identify the identity of the child.

              Just two examples from the sad litany of child abuse in New Zealand: at one end of the continuum Kahui, and Jimmy Mason at the other. Would you like more examples?

              Timothy may have meant that the names of children who survive sexual abuse and/or other violence carried out by someone who would by association identify the victim then, yes. Otherwise, its another example of Timothy bullshit.

      • Graeme 6.2.2

        I don’t see that it’s different. The child is safe – already removed from the unsafe environment. If you need the information out there to protect a child, sure, but that wasn’t the hypothetical.

  7. I’m no fan of Bennett. I think she’s in the wrong and have said as much on my own site.

    But is it necessary to bring the Weatherston case into the discussion?

    He killed someone in a brutal manner. She may have breached the Privacy Act. Let’s keep some perspective on things.

    • snoozer 7.1

      I see the point – just because someone has got away with something in the past doesn’t make it acceptable when someone else does it and gets caught.

      Sometimes an extreme example is needed to show the ludicrousness of the logic in an argument

    • The Voice of Reason 7.2

      Dunno, Scott, they both seem to like the provocation defence. Hope it works out just as well for Bennett as it did for Weatherston.

      • BLiP 7.2.1

        It is exactly the provaction defence. Further, Bennett’s decision that she knew better than to ask for advice indicates a certain level of narcissism that is becoming more and more apparent in National Inc.

  8. burt 8

    “They did it too’ is the last refuge of the apologists.

    ( One spectacular case that sticks in my mind was a muppet telling me that National once validated $50m so Labour validating an unknown amount of money covering 14 years was just fine by him )

    The debate needs to be lifted from ‘but your team did it too’ to a debate on principles, ethics and standards. The people (the voters) have a right to expect their elected representatives will act in the best interests of the voters above their own or their parties. We must be able to expect that our elected representatives will act within the law. (Particularly so with regard to laws they have written to ‘govern’ themselves)

    I think you are right to make a stand about Bennett and the apparent breach of the privacy laws. It is good to see that opposition has removed the burden of defending the govt for Labour supporters and allowed them to focus on right and wrong rather than defending expedient and convenient. Defending expedient and convenient has been picked up on National party supporter bloggs.

    It’s a funny game of musical chairs the partisans play, I’ll be mighty impressed if this attack of principles here at the standard survives for long once Labour are back in power. But that is a few years away so lets get on holding the govt accountable to us now and worry about the game of it all next time somebody calls out ‘all change seats’.

    • Tim Ellis 8.1

      burt, I was using the “but Labour did it too” defence against the specific claim that it was a new thing, and that Labour didn’t do it.

      I think there is a genuine question of principle about whether it is appropriate for a minister to present important contextual information about a person’s case, when that person is only presenting half the story about their case.

      • exbrethren 8.1.1

        Bennett says that it was important to release this information as the people concerned were talking about the law change but says it is inappropriate to release her own info, blatant hypocrisy. She also appears to have been very selective in what she released in a pretty transparent attempt to get talk radio to savage these women.

        It is certainly a moral abuse of ministerial power if nothing else.

        • Tim Ellis 8.1.1.1

          I don’t think Paula Bennett has ever misrepresented the amount of money she got from the state to advance her case for getting more benefits from the state.

          • lprent 8.1.1.1.1

            Yes she did. It was mentioned on the campaign trail many times last year. For that matter as recently as this week.

            In effect she was using previous benefit payments for arguing for more benefit payments as a MP. Subsequently she used it when appointed as minister and for promoting this government. As such it belongs in the public domain using her own criteria.

            I can’t really distinguish between people drawing benefits from the state.

          • snoozer 8.1.1.1.2

            Neither did they

          • exbrethren 8.1.1.1.3

            They are campaigning to keep the TIA, she is campaigning to scrap it despite benefitting from it herself. Using her logic all her finances should be released as well.

            • Maynard J 8.1.1.1.3.1

              Her salary as a demonstration of what you can do if the ladder is not pulled up in front of you by the last person to climb it?

              Na, two wrongs do not make a right. I do not want to know what she got, and have no right. Same as with these two.

            • exbrethren 8.1.1.1.3.2

              I totally agree, but was just pointing out her rank hypocrisy over the issue.

      • The Voice of Reason 8.1.2

        Hi, Tim and brave of you to keep using your real name, given the circ’s!

        The issue the women were highlighting is the removal of the TIA, not the total benefits they were on. They want to see the allowance retained. Bennett doesn’t. That’s the issue, that’s the argument. The other payments they receive have no bearing whatsoever on the validity of their position against its removal. So it was completely underhand for Basher Bennett to release the details and if it costs Key another Minister, that’s appropriate.

        Glad that you mentioned the welfare of children, too. Wonder how the kids of these two women are getting on at school today? Any chance they’re receiving the same kind of abuse Bennett has caused to be dished out at their mums?

        • felix 8.1.2.1

          Hi, Tim and brave of you to keep using your real name, given the circ’s!

          Not really, Tim doesn’t criticise the govt so he’ll be fine.

          • andy 8.1.2.1.1

            Not really, Tim doesn’t criticise the govt so he’ll be fine.

            This government, but what about the next one?

            • snoozer 8.1.2.1.1.1

              Tim will have no objection to them releasing personal information about him to ‘balance the debate’ if he opposes them

            • Tim Ellis 8.1.2.1.1.2

              Sure, felix, if I go public about an entitlement I want to receive and explain my personal financial circumstances as a reason for receiving the entitlement, but withold half of the information about my personal circumstances, I would not be bothered if the government released the rest of the facts. In fact on the privacy commissioner’s website, the eighth example highlights just that scenario.

            • Pascal's bookie 8.1.2.1.1.3

              I’m not at all sure that that’s the case here Tim, but even so.

              It seems that if someone claims that the current level of taxation is too high, and that that is affecting their business, or whatever else; then you would have no problem with the IRD releasing all the info they hold about that person’s income and tax details.

            • Tim Ellis 8.1.2.1.1.4

              I think the tax issue is quite different, PB because there are strict tax secrecy laws. If those laws didn’t exist and Party A started a campaign saying: “Tim Ellis pays too much tax! He pays $50,000 in tax! Give him a tax break!”, then apart from the tax secrecy requirements, I wouldn’t have a problem with Mr Dunne coming out and saying: “That’s not correct. He paid $10,000 in tax last year, missed a tax payment the year before and he’s got working for families for the past four years meaning he’s paid no tax.”

            • Marty G 8.1.2.1.1.5

              Tim. Can you point me to these ‘strict secrecy laws’ that somehow set a higher standard for privacy on tax issues then on other confidential info that the government holds on you.

              What you fail to see, Tim, is that by being willing to sacrifice or disregard these women’s rights in this case, you’re opening yourself to be the next person to have their rights abused. We stand together or we fall alone.

          • The Voice of Reason 8.1.2.1.2

            I’m more worried that Tim has got offside with Burt! I hate to see the right squabbling amongst themselves, its so anti-aspirational.

            • IrishBill 8.1.2.1.2.1

              Tim you’ve already gone public on lots of issues right here on the Standard. Using Bennett’s “logic” releasing your personal information could be justified as balancing the debate by demonstrating how you would personally gain/lose from the implementation of the policies you argue for/against.

            • Tim Ellis 8.1.2.1.2.2

              Not really, IB, because I haven’t gone publicly campaigning and misrepresenting my personal circumstances to get more from the government, and nor has any political party on my behalf.

            • Marty G 8.1.2.1.2.3

              Tim. get it into your head. Your privacy is not subject to you being ‘worthy’ or ‘good’ in a minister’s judgement.It is a right. They don’t have the power to throw that out the window… not even if your story is, horror of horrors, taken up by the Opposition

  9. graham 9

    so irish bill you dont remember erin leigh what a bad memory you have
    please keep attacking national it helps to raise their support

  10. felix 10

    Can someone start a “kid’s table” thread just for the two of them to fight it out?

    • felix 10.1

      oops that was supposed to be a reply to TVoR.

      • burt 10.1.1

        Oh, no offence Tim. I normally agree with much of what you say and you don’t automatically take a contrary position to everything I say like some muppets.

        However as much as I like knowing how much these welfare cases who are lovers of state dependency really take off productive people each week – I don’t think Bennett was right to release the details.

        • Tim Ellis 10.1.1.1

          Fair enough burt. I’ve said elsewhere that I thought it was a line call from Ms Bennett, and I think she probably thinks now she should have got legal advice before releasing it and I don’t know the privacy law to be able to say one way or the other whether it was appropriate.

          I think though there are three issues. Should there be a defence if a person goes public with only half their details, to allow the Minister to release the other half of the details to put the case in perspective? I think so, and the advice from the Privacy Commission is they have that defence. I don’t know if it applies in this case.

          Secondly, is it ethical for a political party to put up individual cases (people often in quite difficult circumstances) to put up only half the relevant information and then expose those individuals to humiliation when the media finds out the full facts? This isn’t the first time that the Labour Party has done this. Mr Goff seems to be fashioning his leadership style around hamming up a case using only half a story, and then leaving the poor sod to face the music when the media finds out the rest of the facts.

          Thirdly (and it isn’t the you did it too defence), but I get annoyed with Labour saying that they didn’t do it. It’s either acceptable conduct for a Minister or it’s not, as you say. Labour shouldn’t play for outrage game over it when according to half of the press gallery it was common practice for Labour to shop this around. That is not an excuse for the conduct but it does mitigate against Labour’s outrage over it.

    • burt 10.2

      I wasn’t responding to Tim, but I guess he thought the cap fitted. I don’t care about Tim’s position. Change the players and Tim & rOb are interchangeable as far as I’m concerned. Sure they both mean well but really there is a limit to how much “My side was justified” I can take in any one day.

  11. burt 11

    As a side issue, how did Bennett get hold of the details for these two woman?

    What I’m asking is; Can the minister just ask somebody in MSD/WINZ/Social Welfare to give her the details for individuals?

    This in itself sounds wrong ?

    • RedLogix 11.1

      Bennett was also confronted in Parliament by questions about where the information had come from. It appears from her answers to Annette King that Bennett has a computer in her office from which her welfare officials can access beneficiary files.

      That is how she got the information – without going through the chief executive of the ministry of social development, Peter Hughes.

      Labour is suggesting that Hughes, one of the public service’s leading CE’s, is furious about it. That may or may not be true but at the every least he should have been consulted about such a sensitive matter.

      Herald

      Not sure if this makes it any better or not. At least the Ministry may not have been directly involved.

      • burt 11.1.1

        RedLogix

        That is actually quite disconcerting. Are we to believe that there is access to individual welfare case files in the ministers office? That sounds like BS to me and I suspect somebody is telling porkies.

        However if the minister has direct access available to individual case files the question “WHY?” needs to be asked.

        Oh, cheers for the Herald link.

    • felix 11.2

      I wondered that too burt, I would have thought a person’s private information would be off limits to anyone apart from those directly working on that particular case, including Ministers.

      It’s worrying to think that a Minister would have free access to personal details at all, whether they were to make them public or not.

  12. burt 12

    OK, so she did get access to personal details now the next question is; Excluding the overarching conditions imposed by the privacy commission, what declarations of secrecy and privacy did Bennett sign when she became a minister? Surely there were non disclosure arrangements that remove her rights to publicly discuss details concerning information that is not already in the public domain?

    • burt 12.1

      <wind_up_the_muppets>Actually in the theme of apologists – we must not forget that the business of govt is whatever govt decide it to be.</wind_up_the_muppets>

  13. Maggie 13

    If John Key was discovered in bed with a group of girl guides, Tim Ellis would tell us how wonderful it was that the PM was taking such a personal interest in the welfare of our young people…..

    Didn’t Bennett say something in Parliament about her office having to regularly field enquiries from MPs about the WINZ entitlements of individual constituents?

    Why on earth should those enquiries go to the Minister’s office? Isn’t that the sort of thing that electorate secretaries and local WINZ offices are for?

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Wider roll-out of cameras on boats to support sustainability and protect marine life
    Up to 300 inshore commercial fishing vessels will be fitted with on-board cameras by 2024 as part of the Government’s commitment to protect the natural marine environment for future generations.  Minister for Oceans and Fisheries David Parker today announced the funding is now in place for the wider roll out ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 hour ago
  • Plan for vaccine rollout for general population announced
    New Zealanders over 60 will be offered a vaccination from July 28 and those over 55 from August 11, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced today. The rollout of the vaccine to the general population will be done in age groups as is the approach commonly used overseas, with those over ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • New Zealand introduces Belarus travel bans
    New Zealand has imposed travel bans on selected individuals associated with the Lukashenko regime, following ongoing concerns about election fraud and human rights abuses after the 2020 Belarus elections, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta has announced. The ban covers more than fifty individuals, including the President and key members of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • NZ economy grows driven by households, construction and business investment
    The Government’s efforts to secure the recovery have been reflected in the robust rebound of GDP figures released today which show the economy remains resilient despite the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, Grant Robertson said. GDP increased 1.6 percent in the first three months of 2021. The Treasury had ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • Milestone 250th tower continues to improve rural connectivity
    The Government has welcomed the completion of the 250th 4G mobile tower, as part of its push for better rural connectivity. Waikato’s Wiltsdown, which is roughly 80 kilometres south of Hamilton, is home to the new tower, deployed by the Rural Connectivity Group to enable improved service to 70 homes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • Quarantine Free Travel pause with Victoria to lift on Tuesday
    Following a further public health assessment of the COVID-19 outbreak in greater Melbourne, New Zealand’s Quarantine Free Travel pause with Victoria has been extended to 11.59pm on Tuesday 22 June, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins says. It has been determined that the risk to public health in New Zealand continues ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • Prime Minister mourns passing of Dr Sir Ian Hassall
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is mourning the passing of Dr Sir Ian Hassall, New Zealand’s first Children’s Commissioner and lifelong champion for children and children’s health. As a paediatrician Sir Ian contributed to a major world-first cot death study that has been directly credited with reducing cot deaths in New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • APEC structural reform meeting a success
    APEC ministers have agreed working together will be crucial to ensure economies recover from the impact of COVID-19. Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs David Clark, chaired the virtual APEC Structural Reform Ministerial Meeting today which revolved around the overarching theme of promoting balanced, inclusive, sustainable, innovative and secure growth ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Digital hub to boost investment in forestry
    A new website has been launched at Fieldays to support the forestry sector find the information it needs to plant, grow and manage trees, and to encourage investment across the wider industry. Forestry Minister Stuart Nash says the new Canopy website is tailored for farmers, iwi and other forestry interests, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government continues support for rangatahi to get into employment, education and training
    Over 230 rangatahi are set to benefit from further funding through four new He Poutama Rangatahi programmes, Minister for Social Development and Employment Carmel Sepuloni announced today. “We’re continuing to secure our economic recovery from COVID by investing in opportunities for rangatahi to get into meaningful employment, education or training ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • NCEA subjects up for consultation
    The education sector, students, their parents, whānau and communities are invited to share their thoughts on a list of proposed NCEA subjects released today, Education Minister Chris Hipkins says. This is a significant part of the Government’s NCEA Change Programme that commenced in 2020 and will be largely implemented by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Major investment in plantain forage programme aims to improve freshwater quality
    The Government is backing a major programme investigating plantain’s potential to help farmers protect waterways and improve freshwater quality, Acting Agriculture Minister Meka Whaitiri announced at Fieldays today. The Sustainable Food and Fibre Futures (SFFF) fund is contributing $8.98 million to the $22.23 million seven-year programme, which aims to deliver ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • America’s Cup decision
    The Minister responsible for the America’s Cup has confirmed the joint Crown-Auckland Council offer to host the next regatta has been declined by the Board of Team New Zealand. “The exclusive period of negotiation between the Crown, Auckland Council, and Team New Zealand ends tomorrow, 17 June,” said Stuart Nash. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Food and fibres sector making significant strides towards New Zealand’s economic recovery
    The Government is backing the food and fibres sector to lead New Zealand's economic recovery from COVID-19 with targeted investments as part of its Fit for a Better World roadmap, Forestry Minister Stuart Nash said. “To drive New Zealand’s recovery, we launched the Fit for a Better World – Accelerating ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Cost of Government Southern Response proactive package released
    The Government has announced the proactive package for some Southern Response policyholders could cost $313 million if all those eligible apply. In December, the Minister Responsible for the Earthquake Commission, David Clark announced a proactive package for SRES claimants who settled their claims before October 2014. It trailed the judgment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New support to reduce emissions from public building and construction projects
    Government agencies are getting new support to reduce carbon emissions generated by construction of new buildings, with the release of practical guidance to shape decisions on public projects. The Ministers for Building and Construction and for Economic Development say a new Procurement Guide will help government agencies, private sector suppliers, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • He Whenua Taurikura: New Zealand’s first Hui on Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism
    The Prime Minister has opened New Zealand’s first hui on Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism, which is being held in Christchurch over the next two days. The hui delivers on one of the recommendations from the report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the terrorist attack on Christchurch masjidain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Speech to inaugural Countering Terrorism Hui
    E aku nui, e aku rahi, Te whaka-kanohi mai o rātou mā, Ru-ruku-tia i runga i te ngākau whakapono, Ru-ruku-tia i runga i te ngākau aroha, Waitaha, Ngāti Mamoe, Ngai Tahu, nāu rā te reo pohiri. Tena tātou katoa. Ki te kotahi te kakaho ka whati, ki te kapuia, e ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Campaign shines a light on elder abuse
    A new campaign is shining a spotlight on elder abuse, and urging people to protect older New Zealanders. Launched on World Elder Abuse Awareness Day, the Office for Seniors’ campaign encourages friends, whānau and neighbours to look for the signs of abuse, which is often hidden in plain sight. “Research suggests ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Farewelling sports administrator and philanthropist Sir Eion Edgar
    Sport and Recreation Minister Grant Robertson today expressed his sorrow at the passing of Sir Eion Edgar – a leading sports administrator and celebrated philanthropist who has made a significant impact both within and beyond the sport sector. “Sir Eion’s energy, drive and generosity has been truly immense. He leaves ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government to apologise for Dawn Raids
    The Government will make a formal apology for the wrongs committed during the Dawn Raids of the 1970’s. Between 1974 and 1976, a series of rigorous immigration enforcement policies were carried out that resulted in targeted raids on the homes of Pacific families. The raids to find, convict and deport overstayers ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Humanitarian support for Bangladesh and Myanmar
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced that New Zealand is providing NZ $8.25 million in humanitarian assistance to support refugees and their host populations in Bangladesh and to support humanitarian need of internally displaced and conflict affected people in Myanmar.  “Nearly four years after 900,000 Rohingya crossed the border ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Poroporoaki: Dame Georgina Kamiria Kirby
    E Te Kōkō Tangiwai, Te Tuhi Mareikura, Te Kākākura Pokai kua riro i a matou. He toka tū moana ākinga ā tai, ākinga ā hau, ākinga ā ngaru tūātea.  Haere atu rā ki te mūrau a te tini, ki te wenerau a te mano.  E tae koe ki ngā rire ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Feedback sought on future of housing and urban development
    New Zealanders are encouraged to have their say on a long-term vision for housing and urban development to guide future work, the Housing Minister Megan Woods has announced. Consultation starts today on a Government Policy Statement on Housing and Urban Development (GPS-HUD), which will support the long-term direction of Aotearoa ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Clean car package to drive down emissions
    New rebates for electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles start July 1 with up to $8,625 for new vehicles and $3,450 for used. Electric vehicle chargers now available every 75km along most state highways to give Kiwis confidence. Low Emission Transport Fund will have nearly four times the funding by 2023 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Progress towards simpler process for changing sex on birth certificates
    The Government is taking the next step to support transgender, non-binary and intersex New Zealanders, by progressing the Births, Deaths, Marriages and Relationships Registration Bill, Minister of Internal Affairs, Jan Tinetti announced today. “This Government understands that self-identification is a significant issue for transgender, non-binary and intersex New Zealanders, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Crown speeds up engagement with takutai moana applicants
    The Crown is taking a new approach to takutai moana applications to give all applicants an opportunity to engage with the Crown and better support the Māori-Crown relationship, Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Minister Andrew Little says. Following discussions with applicant groups, the Crown has reviewed the existing takutai moana application ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment (AODT) Court opens
    The Minister of Justice, Kris Faafoi, and the Minister for Courts, Aupito William Sio, have welcomed the opening of a new Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment (AODT) Court in Hamilton. The AODT Court (Te Whare Whakapiki Wairua) addresses situations where substance abuse and offending are intertwined. “New Zealanders have told ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • EU and UK FTAs top of list for first ministerial trip since COVID-19
    Trade and Export Growth Minister Damien O’Connor today announced details of his planned visit to the United Kingdom and European Union next week, where he will hold trade and agriculture discussions to further New Zealand’s economic recovery from COVID-19. The visit will add political weight to ongoing negotiations with both the EU ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Arihia Bennett to chair Royal Commission Ministerial Advisory Group
    Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu chief executive Arihia Bennett MNZM has been appointed chair of the newly appointed Ministerial Advisory Group on the Government’s Response to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the terrorist attack on Christchurch mosques. “Twenty-eight people from diverse backgrounds across Aotearoa have been selected for the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to the New Zealand Medical Association General Practitioners' Conference, Rotorua
    Ki ngā pou maha o te whare hauora o Aotearoa, kei te mihiTo the pillars of our health system I acknowledge/thank you Ki te ope hapai hauora o roto o tēnei rūma, kei te mihi To our health force here in the room today, I acknowledge/thank you He taura tangata, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Karangahape Road upgrades are streets ahead
    The upgrades to Karangahape Road makes the iconic street more pedestrian and cycle-friendly, attractive and environmentally sustainable, Transport Minister Michael Wood and Auckland Mayor Phil Goff said at the formal celebration of the completion of the Karangahape Road Enhancements project. The project included widening footpaths supporting a better outdoor dining ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Speech to APEC business event
    E ngā tumu herenga waka, ākina ā ngaru, ākina ā tai ka whakatere ngā waka ki te whakapapa pounamu, otirā, ki Tamaki o ngā waka Tena koutou katoa… To the great leaders assembled, who guided your waka through turbulent times, challenging waters and you continue to navigate your respective waka ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Pause on Quarantine Free Travel with Victoria extended
    Following an assessment of the COVID-19 outbreak in greater Melbourne, New Zealand’s Quarantine Free Travel pause with Victoria will continue for a further seven days, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins says. There are now 93 cases associated with the outbreak in greater Melbourne, spread over four clusters. Contact tracing efforts ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Supplier Diversity Aotearoa Summit: Navigate 2021
    *** Check with delivery *** A mihi to all who have contributed to making today a success – starting with you! As you have explored and navigated government procurement today you will hopefully have reflected on the journey of our people so far – and how you can make a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pukemiro School to close
    Pukemiro Primary School near Huntly will close following years of declining roll numbers, Education Minister Chris Hipkins announced today. “I’ve consulted with the School Commissioner, and this decision acknowledges the fact that the few remaining students from last term are now settled at other nearby schools. “I want to thank ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Govt acts to protect NZers from harmful content
    New Zealanders will be better protected from harmful or illegal content as a result of work to design a modern, flexible and coherent regulatory framework, Minister of Internal Affairs Jan Tinetti announced today. New Zealand currently has a content regulatory system that is comprised of six different arrangements covering some ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Consultation on exemption of new builds from proposed tax rules
    The Government has today confirmed new builds will be exempt from planned changes to the tax treatment of residential investment property.  Public consultation is now open on details of the proposals, which stop interest deductions being claimed for residential investment properties other than new builds.   “The Government’s goal is to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech for Predator Free 2050 Conference
    Introduction E ngā mana E ngā reo E ngā iwi Tēnā koutou katoa   Ka huri ki ngā mana whenua o te rohe nei. Tēnā koutou He mihi hoki ki a tatou kua tau mai nei i raro i te kaupapa o te rā Ko Ayesha Verrall toku ingoa No ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New stock exchange to help grow small businesses
    A new share trading market, designed as a gateway to the NZX for small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), has been granted a licence by the Government. Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister, David Clark said Catalist Markets Ltd will provide a simpler and more affordable ‘stepping stone’ for SMEs to raise capital. “This ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago