web analytics

Brash speech confirms National’s secret agenda

Written By: - Date published: 5:04 pm, July 30th, 2009 - 79 comments
Categories: national/act government - Tags: , ,

This is simply stunning. Don Brash, our new productivity tsar, has just released a speech where he proves he hasn’t changed a bit from the nasty, bigoted far right radical of the Douglas-Richardson era.

It’s a typically long and long-winded speech, but in the first two paragraphs he shows how unsuited he is to fill a position designed to create a consensus on lifting productivity over the next sixteen years.

I’ve stood for election as a National Party candidate in four elections – in a by-election in 1980, and in the general elections of 1981, 2002, and 2005 – so nobody would be surprised to learn that on election night last year I was pleased to see the National Party win the largest share of the vote.

That’s not just because I think John Key will make a fine Prime Minister, or because I know and respect all of the Cabinet, but rather because, speaking as objectively as I can, Helen Clark’s Labour Government was a profound disappointment to me and to many others who care about the future of New Zealand.

There goes any hope Brash will be able put his strong partisan history behind him and approach the productivity issue with an open mind.

Hilariously, he still seems to think one reason New Zealanders are leaving for Australia is because “they’re sick and tired of the political correctness – around race and gender – in New Zealand.” Goodness, I thought we’d left that kind of filth behind us in 2005.

He goes on for several pages attacking the last government, expressing his delight in the ACT Party forming a governing arrangement with National and defending the policies of the reform era. “So much for the ‘failed policies of the past’ as an explanation for our failure to close the gap with Australia!”, he crows.

Of course, Brash can’t publicly prejudge the findings of the 2025 Taskforce he’s chairing, so he pulls out the old Fox News technique of quoting “some observors”, who have found our productivity is flagging because of:

. The rapid increase in government spending after the first MMP election in 1996, and especially after 2005, to the point where government spending in New Zealand is now markedly higher than in Australia as a share of GDP;

. The increased complexity throughout the tax system as a consequence of the increase in the top personal income tax rate in 2000, thus splitting the top personal rate from the company tax rate for the first time since 1988;

. The increased rigidities in the labour market as a consequence of the repeal of the Employment Contracts Act in 2000, and the refusal until this year to contemplate even a very short period during which an employer can dismiss a new employee without the risk of costly personal grievance action;

. The extraordinary obstacles put in front of almost any new investment – be it in roads, electricity transmission, wood processing, or residential land subdivision – by the Resource Management Act, and the way in which local and regional authorities have been allowed to interpret that Act to thwart investment and erode the rights of property owners; and

. The capricious way in which the Labour Government over-rode the rights of the shareholders in Auckland International Airport – and the rights of two major international investors wanting to buy shares in that company – and the rights of Telecom shareholders when the Government decided to unilaterally abrogate the agreement under which the company had been privatised.

It’s quite clear what’s happening here. National realised after 2005 that it couldn’t win a majority with its hard right agenda. So they gave us ‘Labour lite’ and “that nice man John Key”. They’d really changed this time, they promised us. Now they’re back in power it’s clear they were lying all along.

I hate to say we told you so, but, well, we fucking told you so.

79 comments on “Brash speech confirms National’s secret agenda ”

  1. IrishBill 1

    Just like Rankin, Brash is speaking out when he shouldn’t. But like Rankin (and Bennett) he won’t be called to account because this government has no accountability.

    • JustRight 1.1

      Irish Bill – Assuming you are a Labourite. I find your Labour pot calling National black highly amusing and a touch ironic.

      Governments have ultimate accountability on polling day. Up till then, as long as they operate within the law then we the people are at their mercy. I might add, we were sure at the mercy of Labour and their secret social agenda for 9 years.

      • Tigger 1.1.1

        JR – stop living in the past – Brash is here and now and clearly has no understanding of what he’s doing. We will never ‘catch’ Australia. We are far smaller than them, we do not have the same proximity to Asia, the same mineral resources. Brash is tapping into anti-Aussie sentiment all for his agenda of (right at the end of this speech) “Substantial changes will be needed in government spending, in the regulatory framework, in investment, and in tax structures.”

        By the way, some of us wouldn’t move to Australia in a bilion years because of their racism and laws against gay unions…it works both ways Don.

        • JustRight 1.1.1.1

          Tigger

          I agree with you. I wouldn’t move to AUS either – too many Aussies!. I love NZ, and I want my children to live here too when they are old enough to make that choice. I don’t want them to automatically assume that they have to live elsewhere to feel like they are part of the action. That is the objective of the exercise.

          I think you are defeatist about catching Australia. Of course we can! We don’t know what we don’t know on this issue. What I do know is that to boost productivity (as measured by GDP per Capita) we need to get a whole lot more companies who turn over $100 Million who export stuff. These are most likely to be science centred, technology based and digital.

          I believe the way to get this is to create an environment where educational excellence is celebrated, excellence and efficiency is demanded & incented across public & private institutions, people take responsibility for their own learning & lives, basic honesty, trust & integrity are upheld, businesses are encouraged and obstructions removed (especially to hire employees) and the Government takes a macrostructural stance versus a micromanagement we know best stance.

          Get this stuff right, stop arguing about past battles (e.g. slashing wages / privatising assets etc – real left versus right divisions) and focus together on the end game and we have a fighting chance.

          If we decide up front that it is impossible then we will be right. We are as doomed as Labour is going to be in 2011 (that is if they carry on the way they are)

          It is my hope that Don Brash is big enough to get a wide mix of views in his group – much in the same way this Government is involving other parties in areas where there is common ground. If this prevails, then I don’t see that we can’t make some serious in roads.

          • Jeremy 1.1.1.1.1

            “I believe the way to get this is to create an environment where educational excellence is celebrated”
            Please tell this to John Key: idiot just cut university funding!

          • felix 1.1.1.1.2

            Get this stuff right, stop arguing about past battles (e.g. slashing wages / privatising assets etc real left versus right divisions) and focus together on the end game and we have a fighting chance.

            Does this mean:
            “just let them slash wages and sell the assets and get on with it”?

            or does it mean:
            “just stop slashing wages and selling assets and get on with it”?

            Or perhaps “assets and wages just aren’t important”?

            I’m seriously finding it difficult to figure this one out. A Little help?

  2. You have to give one thing to the Nats though – They are really lining some choice heads for the left to roll in 2011.

  3. Ianmac 3

    I suppose the general population will only hear that “Labour got us into a mess and that Brash and Key will gallop off on their white chargers and save us all.”
    About bluddy time the people will say. If an election was held today………………..

  4. BLiP 4

    Brash needs to be watched. His Act Party supporters picked him after his snivelling regrets at becoming another Hollow Man and not following through with his cruel, antiquated and long disproved ideas.

    But, yeah – National Inc have made a mistake with this one. When the “lagging indicators” come home to roost among the “mainstream” we’ll see just how much support there really is for more of the same.

  5. NX 5

    National realised after 2005 that it couldn’t win a majority with its hard right agenda.

    Whatever. Labour stole the 2005 election. Labour broke the electoral spending cap by a massive 25%. And most of that money was spend in the final weeks of the election campaign.
    And what did it get them, a measly 2% more than the Nats.

    • IrishBill 5.1

      Keep telling yourself that.

    • Armchair Critic 5.2

      And while two wrongs don’t make a right, remember that National overspent by 12.5% because the ex-governor of the Reserve Bank forgot about GST.

      • ghostwhowalks 5.2.1

        Forgot? That was the media spin they put out.
        Rainmakers the media buyers sent emails to Joyce ( the campaign manager) saying that the amount allocated was inclusive of GST, he ignored them and went on spending anyway.
        Brash was pretty clueless and focussed on the raising money side
        The motive for doing so was that they were given so much less than labour due to the very low party vote of 20.9% the previous election. What better way to get ahead.
        No surprise that Joyce was parachuted into a top list spot and into cabinet.

      • NX 5.2.2

        12.5% of there broadcasting allowance. They didn’t overspend the their electoral allocation ($2.2 million for the Nats & $2.4 million for Labour).

        • Armchair Critic 5.2.2.1

          So that makes National overspending OK then?
          In my book GST = 12.5%, Brash’s credibility = 0%

    • toad 5.3

      NX said: Whatever. Labour stole the 2005 election

      NX, have you conveniently forgotten about the $1.2m proxy advertising by the Exclusive Brethren on behalf of the National Party? Money that still couldn’t get the Nats over the bar – but only because it was exposed in the week before the election.

      • Pascal's bookie 5.3.1

        …and however much of their parliamentary funding that the AG didn’t count because he chose to only go back 3 months.

      • burt 5.3.2

        toad

        So how much money did Labour validate for themselves and all other parties over the 14 year period that they validated the status quo of spending tax payers money on election advertising?

        We don’t know do we, we will never know just how much illegally spent money was swept under the rug because the Labour party decided that their winning of the 2005 election was more important than hundreds of years of Westminster conventions and the rule of law in NZ.

        We can guess how much the EB spent – but we will never have a friggin clue how much Labour spent stealing elections over a 14 year period. Assuming it was similar amounts to the 2005 election it would have been more than $2.4m for Labour alone!

        Thanks for reminding us how Labour changed the law to make what was lawful for the EB illegal and what was illegal for Labour legal. Self serving pricks got their comeuppance in 2008 though didn’t they!

        • Draco T Bastard 5.3.2.1

          That’s what happens when the AG goes round changing the rules Burt. The general understanding before then was that the spending was legal.

          and Burt, what the EB did gave all indications of being illegal as they were working and coordinating their campaign with National. It’s unfortunate that they were never taken to court over it.

          • burt 5.3.2.1.1

            That’s what happens when the AG goes round changing the rules Burt.

            Classic, you have just proven this comment by Armchair Critic is correct.

          • burt 5.3.2.1.2

            Yes it is a pity the EB fiasco was never tested in court. A bit like Darnton VS Clark was never tested in court… Still that’s what happens when weird unconstitutional stuff happens like the legislature acting as the judiciary to serve their own best interests.

          • Swampy 5.3.2.1.3

            “The general understanding” i.e. the foxes make up their own rules for the henhouse. The simple facts to any impartial observer are a massive conflict of interest; Parliament gets to make its own rules and those rules always tilt in the direction of substantial largesse courtesy of the taxpayer. The CLark government in passing the EFA clearly intended to tilt the balance even more in their own favour by extremely vague wording in key areas.

            • lprent 5.3.2.1.3.1

              So what do you expect from the NACT’s ?

              Something more like a vampire state? That is what their track record indicates…

        • blacksand 5.3.2.2

          ah, yeah. All those elections Labour stole 1991 – 2005? Dastardly!

          • burt 5.3.2.2.1

            blacksand

            No blacksand. They were all snouts in the trough one way or another. Labour got caught and didn’t like it. The way justice works in the hoi polloi is not all are prosecuted for blatant breachs of law, but the ones who are caught have judicial process applied. Partisan acceptance of appalling standards of accountability allow appalling standards of accountability to continue. You won’t find me supporting [ any political party ] giving themselves a get out of jail cause that Bradley made a bad call again and dared to apply the law rather than the parliamentary status quo largesse that all enjoyed.

  6. And we have the other architect of idiocy Roger Douglas, who along with his party has attacked government and parliamentary spending for years admitting to being one of parliament’s big spenders. Amazing hypocrisy and arrogance

  7. Again they use the comparison with Government spending in Australia.
    Most of this is because under OECD rules GST tax raised is not counted as government spending.
    Australia uses GST for revenue sharing with the states, so it goes on police hospitals schools etc, that in NZ are the governments repsonsiblity but not the federal govt in Australia.
    It doesnt make sense , but the wingnuts happily dine out on this statistic

    • Luxated 7.1

      Interesting point about GST there.

      Also I would be appalled if NZ’s government spending as a percent of GDP wasn’t higher than Australia’s. Quite simply if you want to have two countries have a broadly similar level of lifestyle then you need to spend broadly similar levels of money per person, but Australia has a significantly higher GDP per capita than NZ so as a percent of GDP NZ has to ‘spend more’ to get the same results.

    • r0b 7.2

      Huh – that’s really interesting. Got any pointers to where I can read up on that?

  8. RedLogix 8

    And what did it get them, a measly 2% more than the Nats.

    And in 2008 there was a swing to the right, and NACT won the election, but the actual gap between the right and left wing blocks was not nearly as large as some people like to think.

    • burt 8.1

      2% – not a bad result for the $800,000 it cost. Oh that’s right – the extra spending by Labour made no difference to the election outcome so it was OK to validate it and move on. However the extra spending by the EB was so bad for democracy that laws needed to be changed to stop it happening again.

      Hell, people bought that shit and defended Labour for it – just shows how little partisans think about what they stand up for eh.

  9. lprent 9

    Seems like a low probability that Brash can come up with anything apart from matters of his religous faith (Chicago school economics). Is there anyone on this taskforce who knows how to think?

    • Armchair Critic 9.1

      Is there anyone on this taskforce who knows how to think?

      I think the whole point is that they don’t need people who can think, just ones that can repeat the mantra. Anyone who can think would be dangerous.

    • “Is there anyone on this who knows how to think”
      Come on lprent there is no need for thinking when you have neoliberal theory – it takes away the need to think don’t cha know? 🙂

      • Draco T Bastard 9.2.1

        Well, it certainly seems to take away the ability to think for many people.

      • JustRight 9.2.2

        And what makes you any different? Are you seriously saying that you think outside of your philosphy & world view?

  10. Sting 10

    I swing to the right and I get Roger flying sell all airways, and I swing to the left and I get Farter Carter bumairlines.Not to mention the head case Goofy Global Warts.

  11. Irascible 11

    The engkeylish NACT party was always going to screw the NZ voter as the “Labour-Lite” brand didn’t fit their “Classic Coca Cola” pomp & arrogance traditional policy foundation. Once their “Diet-Coke” (Labour- Lite) brand had got where them where they wanted to be they dropped the branding and reverted to type.
    Brash has merely revealed the traditional brand loyalty.

  12. Adolf Fiinkensein 12

    Rave on chaps, rave on.

    Your anti spam word for this comment sums up your yapping.

    “pointless’

    You lost, don’t you know?

    • RedLogix 12.1

      In any functioning democracy it is pretty much axiomatic that parties will loose elections from time to time. As will National at some point in the, probably not too far distant, future.

      In that certain knowledge, let me reassure you that… you are gonna loose, don’t you know?

    • Pascal's bookie 12.2

      So did Brash though fink, so did Brash…

    • lprent 12.3

      Yep and this government is starting to look like they might not last the distance. How many ministers will they lose this year?

      • sausage fingers 12.3.1

        No. You are wrong. They are more popular than ever. I suggest you get out more. Talk to people who do not live in Grey Lynn. Stuff like that.

        • lprent 12.3.1.1

          Hi B…

          You’re up to date. Grey Lynn has almost as good connections.as Newton, and the buses are as good. Besides Lyn likes it (godknows why)..

          However it is moving time soon for both me and this useless government. The wilderness looks like a good place for these clowns – meditation would help their kama (and possibly their intelligence).

          (are you sure you aren’t curly. He likes stalking as well..)

          • sausage fingers 12.3.1.1.1

            And bless you too.

            But (as the ‘sod would say) it’s “karma”.

            And then he’d make a joke about having sex with your mum.

            God, I miss him.

            • lprent 12.3.1.1.1.1

              Ummm… My mum would have castrated him and the old man would have left him literally legless. My sister and brother are just plain nasty (we will not mention their traits). Rocky and I are the civil members of the family.

              Russia would be safer.

  13. mike 13

    The ‘secret agenda’ smear died with labour in 2008 – but hey when things are this bad for the left nothing to lose with a re-run..

  14. Daveski 14

    A couple of points Eddie.

    1.

  15. Jared 15

    Lets get back to the main reason why we have experienced an exodus of talented New Zealanders to Australia, higher wages, better working conditions, and a more moderate government.

    • sk 15.1

      We get stuck over and over in these basic debates . . a NZ groundhog day. Why does Brash not ask why people leave South Australia or Tasmania for VIC or NSW? .. . NZ in economic performance terms is similar to the poorer Australian states . . this is not a big deal. We have real issues to address but framing it in terms of NZ vs Australia as opposed to NZ vs SA or TAS gets us nowhere . . .which is why the public debate in NZ is so depressing at times . . .

      • RedLogix 15.1.1

        Oh the answer is pretty easy. There are two main reasons why kiwis migrate to Aus:

        1. More opportunity. Most kiwis work for SME’s that employ less than 10 people; no matter how good you are there is a real limit to your career path in such a small fishpond. By contrast in Aus bigger enterprises, and more of them in any given industry, opens doors to personal progress.

        2. To get away from the low expectations of family and whanau; making a fresh start after a small town gets too small.

  16. Daveski 16

    A couple of points Eddie.

    1. A link would help so we can draw our own conclusions.
    2. I’m not aware that the other members have been announced so any determination about their conclusions is a little premature.
    3. Using the F word doesn’t really impress anyone (unless you’re on TV One).
    4. Seeing you guys know the agenda so well, it’s hardly secret is it? Mind you, if you keep repeating the matra enough, someone will finally believe it is true.
    5. My comments would be more compelling if I hadn’t stuffed up the first attempt to post these points 🙂

    • No they wouldn’t Daveski you have said nothing but denied the nose on your face.

    • felix 16.2

      Daveski:

      A bit predictable, mate. Before the election you guys were all “BUT THEY DON’T HAVE A HARD RIGHT-WING AGENDA!!!”

      And now that it’s out in the open and they obviously do, you guys are all “BUT IT’S NOT SECRET!!!”

      Weak.

    • Aj 16.3

      Daveski July 30, 2009 at 8:28 pm

      Your first attempt at this post made more sense than the second….

  17. Armchair Critic 17

    Daveski – “if you keep repeating the mantra enough, someone will finally believe it is true”

    You sound like you are ideal to join Don on the productivity commission.

    • Daveski 17.1

      Some evidence of both an agenda or at least some secrets (and ideally both) would assist the credibility of the argument. Simply repeating it with the F word for effect shouldn’t pass for credibility.

      • felix 17.1.1

        Really Dave?

        You know what the words mean.

        Agenda is the stuff they want to do. (privatise everything, loot the state, screw down wages, redistribute wealth upwards, remove protections for workers, bash the beneficiaries etc etc)

        Secret was them saying “We promise we won’t do any of that stuff”. (we’re just like Labour but with bigger tax cuts.)

        • JustRight 17.1.1.1

          The agenda is as stated – get our productivity up so we can enjoy similar living standards to AUS. Nothing secret there.

          Yes, there may be some sale of under performing assets (no different to what Companies do). Looting the state – sorry the Left are on shaky ground here. Screw down wages – that would defeat the purpose of the exercise – however labour market flexibility is important for the flow of resources into the highest return parts of the economy. Redestribute wealth upwards – sorry this is a communist fallacy. Bashing beneficiaries – discussing the drag & social issues that are the result of the welfare state isn’t beneficiary bashing. We need to accept that our welfare state can be a disaster and is most certainly part of the productivity issue.

          They have said they will not sell assets this term, but will campaign on it next term – can’t get more open than that. Did Labour campaign on anti-smacking or buying kiwirail or electoral reform in 2005? Does that mean they had a secret agenda? Not really!

          • felix 17.1.1.1.1

            The agenda is as stated get our productivity up so we can enjoy similar living standards to AUS. Nothing secret there.

            So you haven’t read the speech.

            Yes, there may be some sale of under performing assets

            They promised not to sell any assets. So either it was never secret because we all knew they were lying or it was secret because they never told anyone. But it was always the agenda.

            Looting the state sorry the Left are on shaky ground here.

            But you don’t disagree?

            Screw down wages that would defeat the purpose of the exercise

            Not if the purpose is to redistribute wealth upwards. And it usually is.

            however labour market flexibility is important for the flow of resources into the highest return parts of the economy.

            Code for screwing down wages. Thanks.

            Redestribute wealth upwards sorry this is a communist fallacy.

            If it doesn’t happen, I’ll give you that. But seeing as that’s exactly what’s happened every time these policies have been tried anywhere in the world, the onus is on you to explain why it’s different this time. So far you’ve offered zero.

            Bashing beneficiaries discussing the drag & social issues that are the result of the welfare state isn’t beneficiary bashing.

            I’m talking about what’s really happening now, not what you think should happen. And over the past week we’ve seen plenty of benny bashing from the govt.

            They have said they will not sell assets this term, but will campaign on it next term can’t get more open than that.

            In case you didn’t notice, this post was about the govt setting up a task force to promote privatisation. In this term. Right now.

            So it’s ok to promise you won’t sell anything in the first term and then spend the entire first term setting up the shop and putting the for sale signs out?

            Somehow I don’t think that’s how the voters will interpret “No Asset Sales” come 2011.

            • JustRight 17.1.1.1.1.1

              Thanks for that Felix. I for one have a huge day of work to do. I need to pay taxes so Labour’s Beneficiary poster child Ms Fuller can get another $10K grant to set up a ‘cleaning business’ .

              I am not a benny basher, and if a taskforce can deal with the basic immorality of the Fuller situation, then I say ‘Bring it On’

              Thanks for your reply though (sincerely). Different world views me thinks and never the twain shall meet!

  18. burt 18

    The Don is back.

    Perhaps I should send a suggestion to iPredict that they list a stock so people can pick how many weeks or months it takes before ‘Brash’ & ‘Secret Agenda’ appear as large as ‘Key’ & ‘National’ in your tag cloud.

    • lprent 18.1

      It is interesting looking at tag clouds. The ones from the right (ok – not yours – need to do some more work there (remember what work is?)) feature Clark and Labour at similar weights.

      It is a partisan blogosphere – and you’re not doing your part. Are you unable to raise original thoughts?

      (for some reason I feel really evil tonight, good thing I’m writing rather than sysop’ing)

      • felix 18.1.1

        Yeah it’s sad – and I’ve given him heaps of good ideas for things he could write about too. It’s like he just doesn’t care anymore.

  19. rofl this photo should be part of a caption contest!

    “Arise, my apprentice”.

  20. Luke H 20

    So they do have a hidden hard right economic policy after all? Thank god!

    (Oh and by the way: They won, you lost, let’s do lunch.)

  21. ak 21

    Considering the resources and emphasis that the the tories are putting on this “closing the wage gap” thingamy (with staggering hypocrisy btw, considering their disgusting racist opportunism over Labour’s own gap-closing efforts for Maori) I do hope to see the Standard keep a careful eye on it. They made a massive meal of Hels’ OECD aspirations, time for the left to do likewise.

    I’d suggest a regular “Gapwatch” feature (similar to the excellent cycleway watch) complete with estimated costs of uncle Don’s talkfest so far etc. I don’t like their chances: particularly after all the recent posturing on the issue, the difference in that gap come 2011 could be a crucial exposition of the NACTORIs effectiveness – and true intentions. “Jobs, not talk” from the summit is already an acute embarrassment: “we would love to see wages drop” could very well come to pass relative to Oz, and provide a resonant theme for Labour.

  22. randal 22

    the one thing national cannot do is provide jobs. primarily they are a party of accountants and risk averse no matter how many times they call for innovation and imaginationand yadda yadda yadda. they will not jeopardise any capital in case they lose their retirmeent house in the south of france and most of all they want a frre lunch next time they are in wall street even though they know that they are looked down on as the narrow insular hicks they really are but that doesnt matter when they get back here.

    • JustRight 22.1

      Randal You are right. National or Labour can provide jobs. Governments don’t create jobs – businesses do. Jobs that Government provides are through taking money from businesses & individuals. This is done in the hope that the outcomes will be delivered more effectively/efficiently by the Government versus the private sector.

      It is clear that some of our productivity issue is due to the huge increase in Government under Labour. Defend the efficiency of the core public service. Tell me what outcomes have been delivered with the 10000 odd extra people in the bureaucracy. A total social catastrophy that this Government has to undo – that is the legacy of Labour’s job creation scheme!

      • Zaphod Beeblebrox 22.1.1

        You can fiddle around with public employment up and down- give some stuff to the private sector (school cleaners, outsourcing IT etc) but i really don’t see the relevance to our overall productivity either way.
        You need your most productive workers working to their full efficiency (preferably on our side of the Tasman), with our investment capital tied up promoting productive ventures (ie not property speculation or stuff the government will do anyway).
        Why does the government waste its time and energy stuffing around worrying about such a small segment of our economy (the small percentage of public service workers delivering programs they don’t like), when they have so many more important issues to worry about? Is it that they have no idea about what they need to do or are they stuck in a paralell universe or something? I don’t get it.

  23. andy11 23

    This abosultely astounds me, so much for National being a fresh new party under John Key. You would think John Key would rather eat a cup of cold sick than have anything what so ever to do with Don Brash.

    This is a high profile position and all it’s going to do is give Labour some real ammo, instead of picking at the edges which they have been doing recently.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Protect seamounts and ban bottom trawling right now
    The Green Party is renewing its call for Minister for the Environment, David Parker to immediately ban bottom trawling on seamounts. ...
    10 hours ago
  • Building Auckland’s transport future
    We’re making sure Auckland has the infrastructure it needs for the future, so Aucklanders can get around safely and efficiently as our biggest city grows. The new, linked-up transport system we’re building will include partially tunnelled light rail between the CBD and the airport, as well as another Waitematā Harbour ...
    12 hours ago
  • Build Auckland light rail for benefit of everyone
    The Government’s decision on light rail in Auckland is the first step towards building the climate friendly, accessible city our communities deserve. ...
    13 hours ago
  • Put our most vulnerable first
    Don’t forget whānau and communities most at risk, says the Green Party, as the Government lays out its three-phase plan for Omicron. ...
    2 days ago
  • Boosting our immunity against Omicron
    With Omicron in the community, it’s vital we all do our bit to help to slow the spread, keep each other safe and protect our health system. One of the most important ways we can reduce the risk of Omicron is to get a booster dose as soon as we’re ...
    2 days ago
  • Equitable response to Omicron vital
    The Green Party supports the Government’s decision to move Aotearoa New Zealand to traffic light level Red at 11.59pm tonight, but says its success will depend on the support that is made available to the most vulnerable. ...
    5 days ago
  • How we’re preparing for Omicron
    As countries around the world experience Omicron outbreaks, we’re taking steps now to ensure we’re as prepared as possible and our communities are protected. ...
    1 week ago
  • What’s Labour achieved so far?
    Quite a bit! This Government was elected to take on the toughest issues facing Aotearoa – and that’s what we’re doing. Since the start of the pandemic, protecting lives and livelihoods has been a priority, but we’ve also made progress on long-term challenges, to deliver a future the next generation ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Tackling the big issues in 2022
    This year, keeping Kiwis safe from COVID will remain a key priority of the Government – but we’re also pushing ahead on some of New Zealand’s biggest long-term challenges. In 2022, we’re working to get more Kiwis into homes, reduce emissions, lift children out of poverty, and ensure people get ...
    2 weeks ago

  • Tupu Tai graduation-It’s time to step up
    Greetings: Kia orana, talofa lava, Noa’ia e mauri, malo e lelei, taloha ni, fakaalofa lahi atu, ni sa bula vinaka, talofa, kia ora, tena koutou katoa.  I would love to begin by acknowledging everyone here in attendance, especially the families and friends of the 2021/22 Tupu Tai cohort, and those ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • Building and shaping a city: Future-proofing Auckland transport infrastructure
    The Government is bringing Auckland’s transport infrastructure into the future by moving forward with an additional Waitematā Harbour crossing, progressing light rail from Auckland’s CBD to the airport, and creating a linked-up rapid transport network as part of a 30-year plan. Key decisions on additional Waitematā Harbour crossing to be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago
  • Penguin rehab and native forest restoration get helping hand
    A long-running penguin rehab facility which has been hard hit by the tourism downturn, and work to restore native forest habitats in the Catlins are being supported through Jobs for Nature funding, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. Otago’s Penguin Place and The Hokonui Rūnanga Catlins Biodiversity Project will receive combined ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Resilient economy reflected in Crown accounts
    The Government’s financial accounts continue to reflect a resilient economy that has performed better than expected and puts the country in a strong position to respond to Omicron, Grant Robertson said. The Crown Accounts for the five months to the end of November were more favourable than forecast in the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government announces three phase public health response to Omicron
    Reducing isolation period for cases and close contacts at Phase Two and Three to 10 and seven days Definition of close contact required to isolate changes to household or household like contacts at Phase Three Increased use of rapid antigen tests with test to return policy put in place for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Ambassador to Thailand announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of Jonathan Kings as New Zealand’s next Ambassador to Thailand. “Aotearoa New Zealand has a long-standing relationship with Thailand, celebrating the 65th anniversary of diplomatic representation between our countries in 2021. We also share much in common at regional and multilateral levels ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government’s Family Package continues to deliver for New Zealanders
    The Families Package helped around 330,000 families in its first year - more than half of all families with children in NZ These families received an estimated $55 per week more from Families Package payments in 2018/19 than in 2017/18, on average Families Package increases to the maximum possible Accommodation ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New Zealand retains top spot in global anti-corruption rankings
    Justice Minister Kris Faafoi has welcomed news of New Zealand’s ongoing position as top in the world anti-corruption rankings. The 2021 Corruption Perceptions Index released by global anti-corruption organisation, Transparency International, ranks New Zealand first equal with Denmark and Finland, with a score of 88 out of 100. “This is an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Testing improvements see New Zealand well prepared for Omicron
    New Zealand’s PCR testing capacity can be increased by nearly 20,000 tests per day to deal with a surge in cases as part of our wider COVID-19 testing strategy, Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall said. “We have continued to adapt our public health response to safeguard the health ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • 5,000 portable air cleaners for schools on their way
    As schools are preparing to return, Education Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 5,000 air cleaners have been ordered for New Zealand schools. “As we know, along with vaccination, testing, good hygiene and physical distancing, good ventilation is important in minimising the risk of airborne transmission of the virus that causes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Zealand to move to Red from 11.59pm today
    All of New Zealand will move to the Red setting of the Covid Protection Framework (CPF) at 11:59pm today as Omicron is potentially now transmitting in the community, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says. “Nine COVID-19 cases reported yesterday in the Nelson/Marlborough region are now confirmed as Omicron, and a further ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Mandatory boosters for key workforces progressing well
    More than 5,785 (82%) border workers eligible for a booster vaccination at 6 months have received it so far, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins says. “That’s a really strong uptake considering we announced the requirement the week before Christmas, but we need to continue this momentum,” Chris Hipkins said. “We ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • NZ to move to Red
    Nine COVID-19 cases reported yesterday in the Nelson/Marlborough region have now been confirmed as the Omicron variant, and a further case from the same household was confirmed late yesterday. These cases are in a single family that flew to Auckland on 13 January to attend a wedding and other events ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand to provide further help for Tonga
    Aotearoa New Zealand is giving an additional $2 million in humanitarian funding for Tonga as the country recovers from a volcanic eruption and tsunami last weekend, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Defence Minister Peeni Henare said today. This brings Aotearoa New Zealand’s contribution to $3 million. “This support will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Quarterly benefit numbers show highest number of exits into work
    The Government’s strong focus on supporting more people into work is reflected in benefit figures released today which show a year-on-year fall of around 21,300 people receiving a main benefit in the December 2021 quarter, Minister for Social Development and Employment Carmel Sepuloni said. “Our response to COVID has helped ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Northland to move to Orange, NZ prepared for Omicron 
    Northland to move to Orange Rest of New Zealand stays at Orange in preparedness for Omicron All of New Zealand to move into Red in the event of Omicron community outbreak – no use of lockdowns Govt planning well advanced – new case management, close contact definition and testing rules ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • RNZAF C-130 Hercules flight departs for Tonga as Navy vessels draw nearer to Tongatapu
    A Royal New Zealand Air Force C-130 Hercules has departed Base Auckland Whenuapai for Tonga carrying aid supplies, as the New Zealand aid effort ramps up, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Defence Minister Peeni Henare said today. “The aircraft is carrying humanitarian aid and disaster relief supplies, including water ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand prepared to send support to Tonga
    New Zealand is ready to assist Tonga in its recovery from Saturday night’s undersea eruption and tsunami, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Defence Minister Peeni Henare said today. “Following the successful surveillance and reconnaissance flight of a New Zealand P-3K2 Orion on Monday, imagery and details have been sent ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Aotearoa New Zealand stands ready to assist people of Tonga
    The thoughts of New Zealanders are with the people of Tonga following yesterday’s undersea volcanic eruption and subsequent tsunami waves, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta says. “Damage assessments are under way and New Zealand has formally offered to provide assistance to Tonga,” said Nanaia Mahuta. New Zealand has made an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Record high of new homes consented continues
    In the year ended November 2021, 48,522 new homes were consented, up 26 per cent from the November 2020 year. In November 2021, 4,688 new dwellings were consented. Auckland’s new homes consented numbers rose 25 per cent in the last year. Annual figures for the last nine months show more ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Report trumpets scope for ice cream exports
    Latest research into our premium ice cream industry suggests exporters could find new buyers in valuable overseas markets as consumers increasingly look for tip top quality in food. Economic Development Minister Stuart Nash has released a new report for the Food and Beverage Information Project. The project is run by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Honouring the legacy of legendary kaumātua Muriwai Ihakara
    Associate Minister for Arts, Culture, and Heritage Kiri Allan expressed her great sadness and deepest condolences at the passing of esteemed kaumātua, Muriwai Ihakara. “Muriwai’s passing is not only a loss for the wider creative sector but for all of Aotearoa New Zealand. The country has lost a much beloved ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Have your say on proposed changes to make drinking water safer
    Associate Minister for the Environment Kiri Allan is urging all New Zealanders to give feedback on proposed changes aimed at making drinking water safer. “The current regulations are not fit for purpose and don’t offer enough protection, particularly for those whose water comes from smaller supplies,” Kiri Allan said. “This ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago